Added: 3 years ago
From: 1337radiantEnergy
Views: 1,635
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (13)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • WOW guys, really! Really!

    1. Bush needed a reason to INVAID Iraq, well what a better way then to say that TERRIORIST attacked our country!

    2. It is IMPOSSABLE for a building to fall straight down. Its like one of those Vages casinos coming down with tnt.

    3. There is so much information that the goverment did before the 911.

    4. The plane that hit the Pentigon, wasnt really a plane! After the crash a few SOILDIERS went to a gas station across the street of pentigon and took the only really

  • sry not impossable but uselly only happens when a building is purposly brought down! And a building of the hight of the twin towers, the building would have fallen down on its side and not straight down!. Also if you look closly at the bottom flowers you can see small explosions happening 360deggrees around the whole building!. Compare twin floors when they went down and a casino building and the result is practicly the same

  • haha my bad twin towers

  • video of what really hit the pentigon and the whole in the pentigon doesnt fight the size of the plane that saposable hit the pentigon! Also a engineer of the plane that hit the pentigon said those parts found outside dont match the planes parts.

  • omg this is the biggest lie ever!

    and i mean this video...

  • cmon I really cant understand how people in US still believe what media told you if all around the world we know thats mayor leage BS all the world knows it is a lie but you..

  • The media didn't tell us shit. This happened where we live and if you really believe the bullshit in this video, your'e truly an idiot.

  • Wow is this video ever a crock of shit!

  • Although the fall may LOOK like a controlled demolition, the reality is that heat from the fires inside weakened the support columns and the building came down.

  • how can something that was designed to stand airplanes colapse because of airplanes?

  • Three main reasons. 1 The design was executed in the sixties when the largest jet aircraft was the 737, smaller than these planes today. 2 Any possible collision scenario was considered to be under accidental circumstances, under a slower speed perhaps lost in foggy conditions. 3 The aircraft that flew into the towers, not only larger, were fully fueled and flying at speeds that would have been way higher than anything allowed under FAA regulations.

  • just to make a note, I'm talking about the towers, anyway

    then how can the bottom be so damaged when the explosion happens in the top?

    How can the bottom windows be knocked out when the elevator shaft is airtight?

  • I sent you something regarding building 7 under separate cover.

    I'm sure, with all the debris falling on the street, the windows never had a chance and I understand that burning jet fuel was cascading down the elevator shafts after the impacts.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more