Just to clarify the discussion here - it is well known that Keith Richards uses a pair of 1959 Fender Twin amp onstage. These are the high powered 80 watt Tweed Twins that use four 5881 power tubes and a GZ34 rectifier (not the dual rectifier tubes of the earlier 50 watt model). These babies will run you about $30K apiece if you can find one - Buddy Holly was another fan of this particular model. - Jim C
Got lots of reactions on the comment I posted a year ago. After further investigation it may be the case that the amp has two rectifier tubes and two power amp tubes. I'm not really shure anymore. Besides that, someone pointed to me that the AC30 also deserves it;s name in the hale of fame, so the only thing in my post that holds up is: KEITH RULES! lol
Keith Richards employing Ceramic magnet speakers. Well knock me over with a feather! Come to think of it, Keith's rig on that fabled '69 tour probably had it's fair share of Ceramic magnet pickups and speakers ie., Dan Armstrong guitar's P/Us were Ceramic and those Ampeg speakers if new-were likely Ceramic magnet also. It ain't the arrow, it's the Indian.
@edgeguy99 Dude they're high power twins. There's a simple give away, 3 PA tubes not 4, and the single non matching rectifier tube on the far left. Low powers are 4 PA tubes, 2 power, and 2 rec. High power are 3 PA, 4 power and a single rec. The speakers aren't stock so where their located is where he decided to put them.
@edgeguy99 Dude they're high power twins. There's a simple give away, 3 PA tubes not 4, and the single non matching rectifier tube on the far left. Low powers are 4 PA tubes, 2 power, and 2 rec. High power are 3 PA, 4 power and a single rec. The speakers aren't stock so where their located is where he decided to put them.
Anybody know what that silver box that runs into the amp is? Best view at about 0:28-0:32. I figured it might be and echo/delay unit or a reverb tank.
High powered 5F8-A Twin w/ GZ34/5AR4 rectifier, 4 x 6L6 and 3 x 12AX_ family tubes (probably all 12AX7). Same basic pre-amp circuit topology as the Fender
5F6-A Bassman and Marshall JTM45/ Bluesbreaker. Speakers look like Celestions
i love fender b basses and telecasters i play a p bass and sometimes a tele but i prefer the sound of a marshall amp dunno mayby its the sound im used to?
Keith's distinctive sound is amazing. I wish I could figure out what he does to get that thick sound from the telecaster and the miked Fender Twin amps.
We know the guitar part---open G tuning (DGDGBD), Ernie Ball gauges 11-15-18W-30-42. Last string is removed and guitar modified with special nut, brass bridge, humbucker in neck position. Its the amplification that's an enimga. His backliner, Pierre D'Beauport gave us the scoop about the axes about 10 years ago.
While youre at it tune one of your axes to open E tuning too! Keith used that a lot in the Beggar's Banquet sessions and some on the Let it Be sessions---songs like Prodigal Son and the early versions of St. Fighting Man, JJ Flash. See "mytwangyguitar" guy on YouTube for more info about the tuning for open E because I cant remember off hand.
Don't forget the SM57 and the fact that it's right up on the speaker... adds quite a bit of presence of SM57 response curves are to be believed... then at the mixing board, remove some of the proximity effect...
The sound of the two amps together is unbelievable. Listen to the video when it gets just about in the middle between the two amps!!!! Makes my head spin it sounds so cool. 0:26
Notice too that the speakers are Celestion. That makes a big difference in the sound from these tweed amps. Deffinitely more rock & roll. Jensen, Weber and the like are good only for cleans and the Blues.
It's a indeed a high power twin (4 power amp tubes). Not sure how this vid was recorded, but it does not represent Keith's live sound. On this threat someone stated that the Stones do not sound 'studio' in a live setting and i am glad they don't. Been to a Dire Straits concert once it was just if you were listening to cd at home. That is an achievement, but the whole ambience was dead, awful! Like them, hate them, Fender Tweeds are the basis to all guitarsounds today! Keith rules!
I see what you mean man, if someone gave Richards a Squire Telecaster and a 50$ amp, he would still have his "live" sound more than someone playing his official rig!
@adamhopeless Just happened to read your comment, adam, and thought I'd make contact - hope you don't mind. The Deville is part of the Fender Hot Rod Series Amps. Though they do come in tweed they aren't the tweed '50's reissue amps such as the '57 Deluxe or '57 Twin amp. I own a Hot Rod Deluxe and eventually had trouble with it - I've doctored it to get it to sound right. They are an inexpensive tube amp and use cheap parts. Still, these amps do have merit - but expect trouble.
@adamhopeless Not really! There is a huge difference between '50-ies Tweeds and the stock Tweeds of today! I won't get into details to much, but e.g. 50-ies Tweeds were handwired and they 'drive' on about 380 VAC instead of the modern PCB's with 460VAC. Big differences there, but on the other hand: '50-ies are hard to find and very expensive! Devilles are nice amps and hey, it's a Fender!
@luit13 I'm almost 1000% sure that both Keith and Clapton used the "5E8A LOW POWERED" Twin, not the high powered. The reason why I say this is because Fender has been boasting about how specifically Clapton and Richards (on the cardstock of a brand new twin) and many others used this. Keith gained that distorted sound due to a lack of PAs at gigs and the amps were being blasted (thus naturally getting a dirtier sound live). If you have any other information, please let me know. Thanks!
@rolodexroulette Well, I did extensive research on this subject, because I wanted to build one like Keefs' (and/or Claptons') myself, that is, a good friend of mine is an amptech who builds these amps from Weber kits. In this particular vid it is defenately the high power version. You can tell by the fact that a) both speakers are in line (as they are placed diagonal in the low power version) and b) there are clearly 4 power amp tubes installed. As far as I know, they play the high power version
@luit13 Yeah - see, I thought that the fact the speakers weren't staggered in Richards' amp meant that it was high powered. But the card stock on my 57 Tweed Twin RI says mine is high powered, but the speakers are staggered... (I thought that was low powered) So, now I'm so confused. It does say you can remove a rectifier to get more sag, but then others say you need to get it rebiased... And they both played 6L6 tubes through, which are in mine as well, so now I'm beyond lost.
@rolodexroulette Well, I looked into it again and I am sure that the high powered Twins have the speakers in line (it's also called the Big Box Twin, 4 poweramp tubes). As far as the '57 RI Tweed Twin, that's the low powered 5E8A circuit version (2 poweramp tubes) with staggered speakers, for sure (look at the Fender site)! Besides this, leave your '57 RI Twin as it is! You got yourself a beautifull amp here, the real deal!! Ow, and TT uses 5881 tubes!
They sound amazing live. Better than studio records. If you listen to Tumbling Dice, you'll notice a bright clarity in every note, still crunchy. And songs like Happy, or All Down the Line or Brown Sugar are tube saturation heaven - just volume and hands. Not bad sounding at all, it's pure character. And it may be sloppy, but that's what defined the RS from their early days... Ginger Baker has told they couldn't play very well, but people seemed to like it anyway. And sold more than Cream.
The Rolling Stones sound bad live ? I have seen them live six times in the last twenty years. Twice during the Bigger Bang Tour. I have never thought they sounded bad in the least. Fantastic maybe ! Two million watts of P.A. creates a large and obnoxious sound . Isnt that the way Rock n Roll is suppsed to be ? P/s Old Crappy Tweed Fenders Rock ! Keith has counted his Hundreds of Million$ on them !
You can get pretty close to Keith's sound If you tune your telecaster to open G and don't play the low-E string. This is what he has been doing on a lot of Stones songs since the late 70s. Of course, he has an early 50s tele with a PAF in the neck position, so that really contributes to his tone.
I agree with Mighty Saturn that the Stones often sound sloppy live... cranked up tweed amps through a large sound system in 50,000 seat arenas doesn't make for very clear or crisp sound.
It's nothing like a double deluxe. It's a 1957 High Powered twin - 80watts. It's actually serial number 3 not number 2. Late 50's High Powered Twins are the most desirable Fender amps in the world and the most expensive. I've known mint ones sell for as high as $30,000. They sound absolutely superb.
Dude, this video sounds like crap. Simple as that. It doesn't sound professional, and the playing is rough.
The Stones live sound and recorded sounds are miles apart. Granted music is a matter of taste... but to my ears the Stones recorded sounds is light years better than their live sound. Always has been.
very true flmason...they always had a sloppy tone live...I'm sure the multitude of F.O.H. (front of house) mixers they used over the years did their best however if the source is poor and not tight they are limited in what magic they can do...any good sound tech will tell you they won't bring mics near a drum kit till its properly tuned -the same holds true for the entire band however I doubt anyone working for the Stones actually tells them the truth about how sloppy/crappy they sound live.
There is something interesting happening from about time 00:30 to 00:36 that sounds trademark "Keith Richards", but I'm not sure if it's the tuning/chords, the particular guitar or the amp.
@flmason I agree for the most part re/ studio and live stones. Part of it has to be that they had great resources behind their tone in the studio and they couldn't match it on stage (at least in the 60s and most of 70's) When I check out their recent performances on youtube, I can see that some of the tech for their live sound has caught up....instruments much clearer and articulate.
Oh the old stuff!
dropeff 1 week ago
Anyone else get an erection hearing that amp?
MrPomeroyWatson 3 weeks ago
@MrPomeroyWatson Yeah, twice today.
luit13 1 week ago
Man that thing sounds great.
1Doz 1 month ago
Just to clarify the discussion here - it is well known that Keith Richards uses a pair of 1959 Fender Twin amp onstage. These are the high powered 80 watt Tweed Twins that use four 5881 power tubes and a GZ34 rectifier (not the dual rectifier tubes of the earlier 50 watt model). These babies will run you about $30K apiece if you can find one - Buddy Holly was another fan of this particular model. - Jim C
LAPhillyBoyVideos 3 months ago
wats the first song?
1FenderGuy 4 months ago
What is the name of the last song?
MemoTheOak2 6 months ago
@MemoTheOak2 Detox Mansion - Warren Zevon
holdennichols 5 months ago
@holdennichols Thank you very much. It`s a cool song.
MemoTheOak2 4 months ago
Got lots of reactions on the comment I posted a year ago. After further investigation it may be the case that the amp has two rectifier tubes and two power amp tubes. I'm not really shure anymore. Besides that, someone pointed to me that the AC30 also deserves it;s name in the hale of fame, so the only thing in my post that holds up is: KEITH RULES! lol
luit13 6 months ago
Keith Richards employing Ceramic magnet speakers. Well knock me over with a feather! Come to think of it, Keith's rig on that fabled '69 tour probably had it's fair share of Ceramic magnet pickups and speakers ie., Dan Armstrong guitar's P/Us were Ceramic and those Ampeg speakers if new-were likely Ceramic magnet also. It ain't the arrow, it's the Indian.
LarryRickenbacker 6 months ago 2
those speakers look just like Mesa Celestion's Black Shadows, ceramic not alnico
miguelazaro83 8 months ago
what's that thing at 0:29 ?
coldironhands1 8 months ago
@coldironhands1 I,m guessing its a reverb unit .. looks like a reverb tank on the top of it .
peterm3964 7 months ago
@coldironhands1 It's a Fulltone Tube Tape Echo.
MrIkesimba 7 months ago
@MrIkesimba Thanks. neat. So does anyone understand his setup? In biggest bang it looks like he has 20 different amps
coldironhands1 7 months ago
Check out the "Fulltone tube tape echo" I have one, they are amazing.
tuberz23 1 year ago
which guitar are u playing? this is almost my dream tone...
ToothyGus 1 year ago
I imagine that's Pierre (in the book Keith says he's a hell of a player).
Thanks for this. Very Cool!
mnaicck 1 year ago
woooooooooooooooooooooaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhh ! ! !
LesCrapio 1 year ago
@LesCrapio ,
You are mistaken, These amps are the High Powered "Big Box" Twins.
The speakers are not staggered in the High Power Twins, they are side by side
and about 1/2" from the bottom to the rim of the speakers. You can see the rectifier
tube on the left and the power tubes next to it, and the 3 pre-amp tubes.
I own a 1960 Tweed Twin, one of the last ones made. I have 2 Celestion Gold 50
Watt ALNiCo Speakers in my Twin and the tone is rich when driven. I use a 1962 Fender Reverb Unit.
Inventour1 11 months ago
They are low power twins.
2 6l6 and 2 rec tubes for 40 watts.
The high power twins had staggered height speakers to squish the amp case thinner.
The late 50s low powered twins were wider and shorter.
edgeguy99 1 year ago
@edgeguy99 Dude they're high power twins. There's a simple give away, 3 PA tubes not 4, and the single non matching rectifier tube on the far left. Low powers are 4 PA tubes, 2 power, and 2 rec. High power are 3 PA, 4 power and a single rec. The speakers aren't stock so where their located is where he decided to put them.
MrGit76 1 year ago
@edgeguy99 Dude they're high power twins. There's a simple give away, 3 PA tubes not 4, and the single non matching rectifier tube on the far left. Low powers are 4 PA tubes, 2 power, and 2 rec. High power are 3 PA, 4 power and a single rec. The speakers aren't stock so where their located is where he decided to put them.
MrGit76 1 year ago
@edgeguy99 Actually the HP Twins had the horizontal speakers and the LP Twins had them caddycornered to fit a smaller cabinet.
go to ampwares(dot)com and have a look
CR3W1SH03S 1 year ago
The one on the left must have been recovered in brown tolex and wheat grillcloth.
superbeavo 1 year ago
Anybody know what celestion speakers he's using there?
rwonfor 1 year ago
Anybody know what that silver box that runs into the amp is? Best view at about 0:28-0:32. I figured it might be and echo/delay unit or a reverb tank.
veitchy88 1 year ago
@veitchy88 It's a Fulltone Tube Tape Echo which is a tape delay cone of a tube Maestro Echoplex.
LSGoCards7 1 year ago
@LSGoCards7
veitchy88 1 year ago
@LSGoCards7 Thank you sir
veitchy88 1 year ago
@veitchy88 You're right, it's a fulltone tube tape echo!
CollapsingMotion 1 year ago
@veitchy88 You're right, it's a Fulltone Tube Tape Echo!
CollapsingMotion 1 year ago
High powered 5F8-A Twin w/ GZ34/5AR4 rectifier, 4 x 6L6 and 3 x 12AX_ family tubes (probably all 12AX7). Same basic pre-amp circuit topology as the Fender
5F6-A Bassman and Marshall JTM45/ Bluesbreaker. Speakers look like Celestions
pcollenYT 1 year ago
@pcollenYT No, the lower power twin had the double rectifier. The higher only had one!
StevenCarinci 1 year ago
i love fender b basses and telecasters i play a p bass and sometimes a tele but i prefer the sound of a marshall amp dunno mayby its the sound im used to?
hambone9119 1 year ago
ive never actually ever heard Keith use the tupe tape echo?
ConorCoughlanMusic 1 year ago
Speakers look like to be ceramic ones.Not AlNiCo, like I imagine w/ such a sound. perhaps AlNiCo without the horseshoe shape? Somebody knows? thxs
2quundar 1 year ago
Amazing sound.
Guitardeca 2 years ago
Wow a Fulltone Tube Tape Echo!
superbeavo 2 years ago
Yeah i guess Keith had to take a Bank loan to be able to afford it?
lidesnowi 2 years ago
0:43 is it a song of the rolling stones? I've never heard it
sumbreuu 2 years ago
Its the roadies and guitar techs setting up before a bigger bang show.
IdolHans 2 years ago
Keith's distinctive sound is amazing. I wish I could figure out what he does to get that thick sound from the telecaster and the miked Fender Twin amps.
IdolHans 2 years ago
think he tunes down and plays with a capo? d maybe?
d-g-c-f-a-d
fun to try anyway, and fenders sound much bigger.
also heard he used to leave the high e-string off completely for some of the recorded rhythm parts.
jayscott49 2 years ago
We know the guitar part---open G tuning (DGDGBD), Ernie Ball gauges 11-15-18W-30-42. Last string is removed and guitar modified with special nut, brass bridge, humbucker in neck position. Its the amplification that's an enimga. His backliner, Pierre D'Beauport gave us the scoop about the axes about 10 years ago.
IdolHans 2 years ago
thanks! gotta try that tuning.
jayscott49 2 years ago
While youre at it tune one of your axes to open E tuning too! Keith used that a lot in the Beggar's Banquet sessions and some on the Let it Be sessions---songs like Prodigal Son and the early versions of St. Fighting Man, JJ Flash. See "mytwangyguitar" guy on YouTube for more info about the tuning for open E because I cant remember off hand.
IdolHans 2 years ago
Perhaps it's pushing the front of the amp hard, and the particular speakers he chooses.
Speakers have a lot to do with the ultimate sound that comes out, being the final filter.
flmason 2 years ago
Don't forget the SM57 and the fact that it's right up on the speaker... adds quite a bit of presence of SM57 response curves are to be believed... then at the mixing board, remove some of the proximity effect...
flmason 2 years ago
Uses a Tele Deluxe with the Seth Lover pickup at the neck...
flmason 2 years ago
AFter a bunch of jumpin up and down about his brown twin amp, I'm glad we can see it is a recovered tweed, babe
1horton3 2 years ago
it sounds like a Gorilla 50 watt
jimmyjustus 2 years ago
The sound of the two amps together is unbelievable. Listen to the video when it gets just about in the middle between the two amps!!!! Makes my head spin it sounds so cool. 0:26
oneonthenet 2 years ago
did he record with this amp. always wanted to know what amp was used for cant you hear me knockin intro
Roos15 2 years ago
@Roos15
i read somewhere that it was some kind of Marshall he used to record that
ConorCoughlanMusic 1 year ago
Notice too that the speakers are Celestion. That makes a big difference in the sound from these tweed amps. Deffinitely more rock & roll. Jensen, Weber and the like are good only for cleans and the Blues.
rjo8500 2 years ago
Are you sure for the speakers?
Honeythebeebee 2 years ago
It's a indeed a high power twin (4 power amp tubes). Not sure how this vid was recorded, but it does not represent Keith's live sound. On this threat someone stated that the Stones do not sound 'studio' in a live setting and i am glad they don't. Been to a Dire Straits concert once it was just if you were listening to cd at home. That is an achievement, but the whole ambience was dead, awful! Like them, hate them, Fender Tweeds are the basis to all guitarsounds today! Keith rules!
luit13 2 years ago 13
That's exactly how Keith sounds live (minus the fact it's not him playing), as it is his rig.
MaggotBrain10 2 years ago
As you said "minus the fact it's not him playing"; the rig is only gear, important yes, but it's the player that makes the sound!
luit13 2 years ago 5
Dude, that's how Keith sounds live, sorry.
MaggotBrain10 2 years ago
I see what you mean man, if someone gave Richards a Squire Telecaster and a 50$ amp, he would still have his "live" sound more than someone playing his official rig!
PindamonhaMAN 2 years ago
@luit13 That's a not a high power twin. Twins come with two tube rectifiers. That's two power tubes and two tube rects.
hotfudgemoney 1 year ago
@luit13 hello, by 'Fender Tweed' ... do you mean the Fender Blues Deville ?...because im thinkin gabout buying one. thankyou
adamhopeless 1 year ago
@adamhopeless Just happened to read your comment, adam, and thought I'd make contact - hope you don't mind. The Deville is part of the Fender Hot Rod Series Amps. Though they do come in tweed they aren't the tweed '50's reissue amps such as the '57 Deluxe or '57 Twin amp. I own a Hot Rod Deluxe and eventually had trouble with it - I've doctored it to get it to sound right. They are an inexpensive tube amp and use cheap parts. Still, these amps do have merit - but expect trouble.
Teachering 1 year ago
@adamhopeless Not really! There is a huge difference between '50-ies Tweeds and the stock Tweeds of today! I won't get into details to much, but e.g. 50-ies Tweeds were handwired and they 'drive' on about 380 VAC instead of the modern PCB's with 460VAC. Big differences there, but on the other hand: '50-ies are hard to find and very expensive! Devilles are nice amps and hey, it's a Fender!
luit13 11 months ago
@luit13 I'm almost 1000% sure that both Keith and Clapton used the "5E8A LOW POWERED" Twin, not the high powered. The reason why I say this is because Fender has been boasting about how specifically Clapton and Richards (on the cardstock of a brand new twin) and many others used this. Keith gained that distorted sound due to a lack of PAs at gigs and the amps were being blasted (thus naturally getting a dirtier sound live). If you have any other information, please let me know. Thanks!
rolodexroulette 10 months ago
@rolodexroulette Well, I did extensive research on this subject, because I wanted to build one like Keefs' (and/or Claptons') myself, that is, a good friend of mine is an amptech who builds these amps from Weber kits. In this particular vid it is defenately the high power version. You can tell by the fact that a) both speakers are in line (as they are placed diagonal in the low power version) and b) there are clearly 4 power amp tubes installed. As far as I know, they play the high power version
luit13 10 months ago
@luit13 Yeah - see, I thought that the fact the speakers weren't staggered in Richards' amp meant that it was high powered. But the card stock on my 57 Tweed Twin RI says mine is high powered, but the speakers are staggered... (I thought that was low powered) So, now I'm so confused. It does say you can remove a rectifier to get more sag, but then others say you need to get it rebiased... And they both played 6L6 tubes through, which are in mine as well, so now I'm beyond lost.
rolodexroulette 10 months ago
@rolodexroulette Well, I looked into it again and I am sure that the high powered Twins have the speakers in line (it's also called the Big Box Twin, 4 poweramp tubes). As far as the '57 RI Tweed Twin, that's the low powered 5E8A circuit version (2 poweramp tubes) with staggered speakers, for sure (look at the Fender site)! Besides this, leave your '57 RI Twin as it is! You got yourself a beautifull amp here, the real deal!! Ow, and TT uses 5881 tubes!
luit13 10 months ago
@luit13 2 power tubes and two rectifier
Honeythebeebee 7 months ago
@Honeythebeebee You may be right. I thought it was a single rectifier with four power amp tubes, but now I doubt about that.
luit13 6 months ago
Comment removed
scorpionfang 7 months ago
Comment removed
scorpionfang 7 months ago
I Have a Victoria Low-Powered Twin Amp loaded with Celestion Vintage 30's. It nails that tone. Early Black Crows too. Great amp!
rjo8500 2 years ago
They sound amazing live. Better than studio records. If you listen to Tumbling Dice, you'll notice a bright clarity in every note, still crunchy. And songs like Happy, or All Down the Line or Brown Sugar are tube saturation heaven - just volume and hands. Not bad sounding at all, it's pure character. And it may be sloppy, but that's what defined the RS from their early days... Ginger Baker has told they couldn't play very well, but people seemed to like it anyway. And sold more than Cream.
marcelcruzeiro 2 years ago 2
The Rolling Stones sound bad live ? I have seen them live six times in the last twenty years. Twice during the Bigger Bang Tour. I have never thought they sounded bad in the least. Fantastic maybe ! Two million watts of P.A. creates a large and obnoxious sound . Isnt that the way Rock n Roll is suppsed to be ? P/s Old Crappy Tweed Fenders Rock ! Keith has counted his Hundreds of Million$ on them !
Chookiman 2 years ago 4
You can get pretty close to Keith's sound If you tune your telecaster to open G and don't play the low-E string. This is what he has been doing on a lot of Stones songs since the late 70s. Of course, he has an early 50s tele with a PAF in the neck position, so that really contributes to his tone.
I agree with Mighty Saturn that the Stones often sound sloppy live... cranked up tweed amps through a large sound system in 50,000 seat arenas doesn't make for very clear or crisp sound.
MikeFromRLC 2 years ago
it's nice to see the magicians rabbit !!...ha ha .......
ravensmead 2 years ago
Nice amps, not too mention that fulltone tube tape echo he's got sitting behind em.
Itseasyifyoutry 2 years ago
anyway, the camera made an excellent job ruining eveything...
anyone knows how to saturate a big fender like that? please mail me?
marcelcruzeiro 2 years ago
Guys come on this amp has seiral #2 it almost
60 years old, and has been used in 100's gigs...
of course it sounds a bit wired...
dadasha 2 years ago
Its it a version of the Double Deluxe....David Gilmour has one in his Asotria Studio and sometimes gigs with in small venues
shineonprickley1975 2 years ago
It's nothing like a double deluxe. It's a 1957 High Powered twin - 80watts. It's actually serial number 3 not number 2. Late 50's High Powered Twins are the most desirable Fender amps in the world and the most expensive. I've known mint ones sell for as high as $30,000. They sound absolutely superb.
blackheartsTV 2 years ago
what the fuck are you all talking about? this is obviously band's soundcheck. played by roadies, or sound men or what ever the fuck...
josipml5 3 years ago 2
what kind of speaker is that with keiths face on it?
derfsanderson 3 years ago
very nice overdriven vintage amp sound!!!
MyroslavMakashov 3 years ago 2
what's the echo box behind the Twin??
koolthang 3 years ago
fulltone tape echo
welfaremothers 3 years ago
full tone tube tape echo
vver 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Sounds like crap, LOL! The engineers must do some serious work on it. If not live, certainly for recordings.
flmason 3 years ago
you have a terrible taste in tone dude
LittleKeef 3 years ago
Dude, this video sounds like crap. Simple as that. It doesn't sound professional, and the playing is rough.
The Stones live sound and recorded sounds are miles apart. Granted music is a matter of taste... but to my ears the Stones recorded sounds is light years better than their live sound. Always has been.
flmason 3 years ago
Basically this video sounds like any garage band anywhere in the world.
Of course since you go by "LittleKeef" you've bought into the mythology. So how could anyone expect you to be objective?
flmason 3 years ago
oh ok i see what youre sayin. i thought you meant the tone in general is bad.
LittleKeef 3 years ago
Basically I did mean it's pretty bad.
It's a distorting amp with a very rough sound. Not "studio" or "pro" sounding at all. Especially compared to their studio sound.
Fender amps, as contrasted to later Marshalls, for example, weren't meant to distort.
Just so happens that sound works for electric/blues based music. But it's still a god awful gaukus tone compared to any number of other tones.
Like many guitar tones in isolation, what works in the mix sux alone.
flmason 3 years ago
very true flmason...they always had a sloppy tone live...I'm sure the multitude of F.O.H. (front of house) mixers they used over the years did their best however if the source is poor and not tight they are limited in what magic they can do...any good sound tech will tell you they won't bring mics near a drum kit till its properly tuned -the same holds true for the entire band however I doubt anyone working for the Stones actually tells them the truth about how sloppy/crappy they sound live.
MightySaturn5 2 years ago
There is something interesting happening from about time 00:30 to 00:36 that sounds trademark "Keith Richards", but I'm not sure if it's the tuning/chords, the particular guitar or the amp.
flmason 2 years ago
yessssssssss so good.
xxxalgo 2 years ago
@flmason I agree for the most part re/ studio and live stones. Part of it has to be that they had great resources behind their tone in the studio and they couldn't match it on stage (at least in the 60s and most of 70's) When I check out their recent performances on youtube, I can see that some of the tech for their live sound has caught up....instruments much clearer and articulate.
karllieb 8 months ago
you see, this amp does not fall short in quality ever
its just a diferent kind of timbre
It can be taken to your "professional" quality parameters the same way as any other quality amp.
btw you are using the term "professional" wrong
vver 3 years ago
If it has to be "taken" to professional parameters then it's inherently not already "professional".
I use "professional" in a colloquial way. I suspect you think I mean "produced", which perhaps I do.
Bottom line is, the sound coming out of that amp, especially being a Fender is a sound the engineers did not intend. Just so happens artists like it.
There's no getting around it. The sound in this clip sounds like any other overdriven Fender Twin in someone's garage.
flmason 3 years ago
yeah...it does like a typical Fender, nothing bad or good -it just is what it is
MightySaturn5 2 years ago
thank you!
ivanarato 3 years ago 7