call of duty 5 might be a funday it might be 10 times better like the ai is just as talented as u and when that guy got attacked at the stair he would have a wrstle or fist fight with him
The AI has nothing to do with diffucility. The AI in Call of Duty games has always stayed since the first game. In Call of Duty 4 the enemy doesn't even try to survive, they just stands there shooting.
A more talented AI would try to stay under cover, use pathfinding properly to utilize covers further away or closer the target and properly realise the environment to make it convincing. I doubt Activision will put some work into the AI, they instead throw in numbers of zombies.
I bought the game a while ago, its pretty good, but like you said, it uses alot of my CPU, but im getting a graphics card for my computer soon, maybe itl run better :)
i build computers for a living so i think i know which is better and i say an intel is better than amd. Amd is just a cheap remake of the original intels. S trust me AMD's are crap.
Pentium is dead and has always been a failed archentecture for games. Just compare any Pentium archentecture performance with AMD K8 Athlon-64 and you will notice.
my 3850 gets more fps then your hd2900xt in call of duty 4 ... i have all high settings 1024x768 (for smooth gameplay) 2x-4x AA (sometimes i change) 16xAF i hit 30fps as the lowest and 95 fps as highest!
Notice FRAPS is active. Nowadays I get a average of 65 and highest 100FPS on 1680x1050 resolution with 16xAF and AA-filter inactive, as the AA filtering and high(er) resolutions results in a significant load for the GPU.
I have windows vista Home preminum AMD ANTHLON 5000+ compute 2 gigs of ram ATI raedon HD 2600 XT graphics card and high definition speakers and a logitech wireless gaming mouse to to it off
GS/GT/GTS/GTX, etc = Prefix represents the performance target.
8600 = Mainstream segment, GT prefix means lower-case performance, overall lower-end mainstream product. GTX is always unique to the enthusiast segment and will not appear in mainstream segment what so ever, perhaps GTS, but that is only a performance/value or casual/enthusiast representing prefix. So, perhaps you got a 8600GTS, not GTX.
For those crying; I've got the full game down and I've been playing through the campaign and the multiplayer for quite some time. I don't think the full game sucks becuase the Demo was horrible, though the campaign was in great requirements of a AI.
What an ignorant little child. Did you know that this game won best FPS numerous times? As far as the graphics go, your machine isn't necessarily what I'd call a gamer's PC.
Awards says nothing, the previous games were the same, that's why they won the awards becuase the concept was new by the time and was just pumped out until there was nothing left of the title. AI doesn't matter if it is low-diff or not, AI isn't the damage the enemies does or how hard they are but how they react to the environment and the situation and on all settings the enemy is just dolls standing there waiting to be killed.
I know. But I based my opinions of the Demo by playing the demo. I got the game down tonight and the campaign was as primitive and unpolished as in the Demo but the Multiplayer is the only reason I at all bothered, ofcourse, just as everybody else.
That's just all up the experiencelevel of the different platforms. Since it's the exact same game, so you're going to think better of the game for the console if you're more experienced with playing on a console or if your computer performance needs a kick in the butt.
The PC always have more dynamic visuals as the PC is able to kick in new hardware and technologies as it arrives while the consoles has a limited hardware that only shines at the start beeing. But this engine would still need some fine-tuning, such as edges and so giving wierd pixelated shading in sharp colors when the environment is dark with a few light-sources. Also sounds would need a serious tuning in this game just thinking of how much audio they converted from CoD2.
Holykebab (vågar jag gissa att du är svensk?), you can't judge the PC performance in general just looking at my performance, since a PC is not a static platform like the console is, in good and bad. And I'm also recording using Fraps so performance kicks down by a 30-50% below average, so compared to that the consoles will run it faster.
umm dude when u were trying to find a way out there was a message when u were at the window to press space to go over it,i think that is what it means.
It can't outperform the 640MB in lower resolutions as the 640MB is the same product with more avalible video-ram, most likely will it outperform the 320MB in any resolution and under every single environment. But 320MB does a significantly better job for the money on lower resolution and/or without AA.
I strongly doubt it. And it is also vital to consider the CPU and not only the videocard, as this game is favoring Nvidia for a bit more to come. I don't know, but more new games like the additional cache of the Intel C2D lineup so there'll be a possible increase in performance just by having that - and new drivers or hotfix will probably boost performance quite a bit - I could guess Catalyst 7.11 or 7.12 (8.0?) will focus on boosting UR3.
according to alot of benchmarks it does, I'm using an AMD X2 4400 processor @ 2.94 GHz (pain in the ass to overclock lol) with an EVGA 590SLI MOBO and a EVGA 8800GTS 320MB superclock with 2 GB of Patriot (SLI Certified) DDR2 6400 800MHz RAM a 400 GB HDD and a 600 WATT power supply with windows vista home premium.
This was the first time I was playing the demo - I've forgot the plot with the newer Call of Duty games where all the action is based on your positioning on the map... Ugh.
No, that is just hickups when it moves from briefing to the actual 3D stuff - but especially noticable when recording as performance is raped by severe (I'll download a newer Fraps version soon). And in the description I mention I do have the Catalyst 7.10
"Everything cranked up to max" is a bad term for videogames as AA can go up to x24 nowadays and when cranked up max then those AA settings needs to be applied if you're putting it that way. I have no problems with this game without the AA, but it just looks even worse as the edges and lightning in this game and engine is kind of bad and old (just look at their helmets, it doesn't make any sense where the light is coming from, it's just glowing)
I got better AA/AF results with my 2900XT than my friends 8800GTS 640mb (8xAA, 16xAF) so that's all biased crap based on the first drivers. And both of our cards are up to date, talking about drivers. He got slightly better general score due to the faster CPU though, 200p difference in 3dMark06.
Difficulity only makes the enemies resist more damage and do more damage, the AI is as ever as static so there's no need to have higher diff. than Regular. In the aging F.E.A.R we saw living AI, these are just dolls sitting around shooting at you in floods, which is as bad as all previous MoH and CoD games.
The game looks pretty good i think i wish my computer i just built would work its got the same specs but different brands and i have the 5200+ x2. Do you know what i can do to fix my build?
My monitor displays the message no signal, the fans on everything run and my monitor works after i did some stuff in settings on my laptop but i cant get to settings unless i format my drive and i cant format my drive if i cant see its so dang confusing if you know what to do or ne1 for that matter can u plz reply to this message. I think the graphics look pretty good in this game doesnt seem like iraq though yeah like u said tho mp in this seems like it would be fun.
evey one whos wonts to know where to download it gamingpixel
kingkonman4 9 months ago
if my pc can run the demo should it also be able to run the full game ?
simpsonsbeemer 1 year ago
@simpsonsbeemer
Basically. Some moments in the campaign and/or multiplayer might be more demanding than the portion of the demo.
BorkaBonum 1 year ago
can u still play on some of the maps
XXXspartanXXZ 2 years ago
i want this game!
K0rn3liuxXx 3 years ago
whered u download from?
BlackHeart1770 3 years ago
the demo kinda sucked for COD4, I finished in like 15 minutes.
Dllshockk 3 years ago 2
obvoiusly! is a demo, activision wannna make you buy full version that why the demo rocked but yet was soo small/short
shizzlex9 2 years ago
kan i play online on demo?
gevorg95 3 years ago
nope
LinkinParkX360 2 years ago
the javelin is just to sick
saadmanh 3 years ago
lol i remember world at wars bazooka was not that sick and the same concept on final fronts which is sad cause final fronts is for the ps2
jeffhardyfan889 2 years ago
I like the Shotgun :>
ziiipfelzweeerg 3 years ago
im downloading it right now.
warhero296 3 years ago
same lol
weirdone156 3 years ago
lol me 2!!
cjracer1000 3 years ago
where did u download it
Killudead8 3 years ago
forgot just google it
warhero296 3 years ago
call of duty 5 might be a funday it might be 10 times better like the ai is just as talented as u and when that guy got attacked at the stair he would have a wrstle or fist fight with him
me123my456i789 3 years ago
The AI has nothing to do with diffucility. The AI in Call of Duty games has always stayed since the first game. In Call of Duty 4 the enemy doesn't even try to survive, they just stands there shooting.
A more talented AI would try to stay under cover, use pathfinding properly to utilize covers further away or closer the target and properly realise the environment to make it convincing. I doubt Activision will put some work into the AI, they instead throw in numbers of zombies.
BorkaBonum 3 years ago
NO the ai in call of duty 2 stayed sinece call of duty 2 don't you know.
SgtThom 3 years ago
mine is Geforce8600 Intel Quad Core Extreme 2GbRam ... will it work well ? reply me becos i wan buy this game ... ty guys
ysphor 3 years ago
can you go online with the demo?
MoreInComedy 3 years ago
Nope, strictly single-player.
BorkaBonum 3 years ago
I bought the game a while ago, its pretty good, but like you said, it uses alot of my CPU, but im getting a graphics card for my computer soon, maybe itl run better :)
The1nX 3 years ago
i build computers for a living so i think i know which is better and i say an intel is better than amd. Amd is just a cheap remake of the original intels. S trust me AMD's are crap.
54syqe 3 years ago
Amd isnt as good for gaming as a pentium
54syqe 3 years ago
Pentium is dead and has always been a failed archentecture for games. Just compare any Pentium archentecture performance with AMD K8 Athlon-64 and you will notice.
BorkaBonum 3 years ago
i got 10-30 fps xD i setting all to high
ati 9550se
768 ram
1.9Ghz
Pentium 4
noname180795 4 years ago
how do you play games on fraps
n3wmon3y 3 years ago
0-10
noname180795 3 years ago
this is on pc?
canucklover11 4 years ago
ur shit at this game
DeathToISLAM666 4 years ago
my 3850 gets more fps then your hd2900xt in call of duty 4 ... i have all high settings 1024x768 (for smooth gameplay) 2x-4x AA (sometimes i change) 16xAF i hit 30fps as the lowest and 95 fps as highest!
MXhm91 4 years ago
Notice FRAPS is active. Nowadays I get a average of 65 and highest 100FPS on 1680x1050 resolution with 16xAF and AA-filter inactive, as the AA filtering and high(er) resolutions results in a significant load for the GPU.
BorkaBonum 4 years ago
AMD is better for gaming trust ME!!!!
bdoughty814 4 years ago
I have windows vista Home preminum AMD ANTHLON 5000+ compute 2 gigs of ram ATI raedon HD 2600 XT graphics card and high definition speakers and a logitech wireless gaming mouse to to it off
bdoughty814 4 years ago
Good game ... i 've got it on my xbox
ColombianDoreon 4 years ago
yeah he right there no such thing and NVIDEA 6100GO is better then NVIDEA 8500GT maybe twice better
armer106 4 years ago
no...
TJAX212 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
y am i able to play crysis with graphic cranked all the way up
armer106 4 years ago
your not
Lightzeo6 3 years ago
no lies idiot i found out i have 2 of the video cards in da laptop
armer106 3 years ago
There's no 8600GTX.
8xxx = Series/Family
xXXX (ex. x600) = Segment/Target on the market
GS/GT/GTS/GTX, etc = Prefix represents the performance target.
8600 = Mainstream segment, GT prefix means lower-case performance, overall lower-end mainstream product. GTX is always unique to the enthusiast segment and will not appear in mainstream segment what so ever, perhaps GTS, but that is only a performance/value or casual/enthusiast representing prefix. So, perhaps you got a 8600GTS, not GTX.
BorkaBonum 4 years ago
what device did you use when you filmed that video?
tunkio10 4 years ago
For those crying; I've got the full game down and I've been playing through the campaign and the multiplayer for quite some time. I don't think the full game sucks becuase the Demo was horrible, though the campaign was in great requirements of a AI.
BorkaBonum 4 years ago
What an ignorant little child. Did you know that this game won best FPS numerous times? As far as the graphics go, your machine isn't necessarily what I'd call a gamer's PC.
"The demo campaign is very bad as a concept"
Who cares. Its a demo.
"Fights are never-ending, AI is untalented"
Yeah, and what difficulty were you playing on?
IronKevlar 4 years ago
Yeah hes right
Killerone360 4 years ago
Awards says nothing, the previous games were the same, that's why they won the awards becuase the concept was new by the time and was just pumped out until there was nothing left of the title. AI doesn't matter if it is low-diff or not, AI isn't the damage the enemies does or how hard they are but how they react to the environment and the situation and on all settings the enemy is just dolls standing there waiting to be killed.
BorkaBonum 4 years ago
I believe you'll be more satisfied with multiplayer anways. The campaign isn't why many people have bought this game. :/
IronKevlar 4 years ago
I know. But I based my opinions of the Demo by playing the demo. I got the game down tonight and the campaign was as primitive and unpolished as in the Demo but the Multiplayer is the only reason I at all bothered, ofcourse, just as everybody else.
BorkaBonum 4 years ago
Oh please, this game is AMAZING. You really are not my type of reviewer, but hey, everyone has their own opinions :p
HatoXanad 4 years ago
the pc version feels like all the other cod's the console version deffinetly feels different in a better way
bryon17 4 years ago
That's just all up the experiencelevel of the different platforms. Since it's the exact same game, so you're going to think better of the game for the console if you're more experienced with playing on a console or if your computer performance needs a kick in the butt.
BorkaBonum 4 years ago
LOL I learned about the Javellin on Future weapons!!! lol
TheSoldier1851 4 years ago 6
haha
xaberas 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
man your dumb . haha you got lost
unit54321 4 years ago
shoulda played more with da ak man
revil5 4 years ago
the praphics ar eso good and they are ven better on ps3 and 360
imsorry14 4 years ago
i agree !!!
djsimo149 4 years ago
no shit its on a computer
bryon17 4 years ago
The PC always have more dynamic visuals as the PC is able to kick in new hardware and technologies as it arrives while the consoles has a limited hardware that only shines at the start beeing. But this engine would still need some fine-tuning, such as edges and so giving wierd pixelated shading in sharp colors when the environment is dark with a few light-sources. Also sounds would need a serious tuning in this game just thinking of how much audio they converted from CoD2.
BorkaBonum 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
not trying to sound like a van boy but i think it performs better on xbox and ps3
holykebab 4 years ago
i dont know. i guess (IMO) that the xbox 360 has slightly a lower graphics but i like the controls on 360 is what im used to
xaberas 4 years ago
Holykebab (vågar jag gissa att du är svensk?), you can't judge the PC performance in general just looking at my performance, since a PC is not a static platform like the console is, in good and bad. And I'm also recording using Fraps so performance kicks down by a 30-50% below average, so compared to that the consoles will run it faster.
BorkaBonum 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
you're a little fuckin douche
Twirlybird1 4 years ago
umm dude when u were trying to find a way out there was a message when u were at the window to press space to go over it,i think that is what it means.
ShadowNinja21 4 years ago
That message is shown in any obstacle you can climb over - I pressed it once but got stuck as I didn'y crouch.
BorkaBonum 4 years ago
With which program you have recorded it?
mauricegreve 4 years ago
Because i Buy me the same Graficcard.
mauricegreve 4 years ago
How much FPS you have?
mauricegreve 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Anyways that game is fucking gay and really retarded with the endless fights and shit..
odogxx 4 years ago
your a fucking homo
tommydude123 4 years ago 4
agreed
Twirlybird1 4 years ago 2
your friend card is buggy I got over 90 FPS on this game with my 8800GTS 320MB but then again the 320 out performs the 640 on lower rez.
odogxx 4 years ago
It can't outperform the 640MB in lower resolutions as the 640MB is the same product with more avalible video-ram, most likely will it outperform the 320MB in any resolution and under every single environment. But 320MB does a significantly better job for the money on lower resolution and/or without AA.
BorkaBonum 4 years ago
.... I've got a GeForce 8800 GTS and i run it exactly as you but with 100 FPS
juanytox 4 years ago
I strongly doubt it. And it is also vital to consider the CPU and not only the videocard, as this game is favoring Nvidia for a bit more to come. I don't know, but more new games like the additional cache of the Intel C2D lineup so there'll be a possible increase in performance just by having that - and new drivers or hotfix will probably boost performance quite a bit - I could guess Catalyst 7.11 or 7.12 (8.0?) will focus on boosting UR3.
BorkaBonum 4 years ago
according to alot of benchmarks it does, I'm using an AMD X2 4400 processor @ 2.94 GHz (pain in the ass to overclock lol) with an EVGA 590SLI MOBO and a EVGA 8800GTS 320MB superclock with 2 GB of Patriot (SLI Certified) DDR2 6400 800MHz RAM a 400 GB HDD and a 600 WATT power supply with windows vista home premium.
odogxx 4 years ago
Jump through the window, dumbass!
the700lbman 4 years ago
This was the first time I was playing the demo - I've forgot the plot with the newer Call of Duty games where all the action is based on your positioning on the map... Ugh.
BorkaBonum 4 years ago
It's been like that in all of them, even the first.
the700lbman 4 years ago
Nice mate I like the reveiw and I agree. I made a movie two (nearly the exact same because it was just the demo) but I would agree.
errlloyd 4 years ago
Jesus yours stutters like crazy too. The start of the level was horrible... you must have some old drivers or something conflicting with CoD4...
superduperjew 4 years ago
No, that is just hickups when it moves from briefing to the actual 3D stuff - but especially noticable when recording as performance is raped by severe (I'll download a newer Fraps version soon). And in the description I mention I do have the Catalyst 7.10
BorkaBonum 4 years ago
I get 60+ fps with everything cranked to the max on my 2900xt e4300@3ghz 2gb XMS2 ram on Vista 64 bit. I use 7.10 drivers.
superduperjew 4 years ago
"Everything cranked up to max" is a bad term for videogames as AA can go up to x24 nowadays and when cranked up max then those AA settings needs to be applied if you're putting it that way. I have no problems with this game without the AA, but it just looks even worse as the edges and lightning in this game and engine is kind of bad and old (just look at their helmets, it doesn't make any sense where the light is coming from, it's just glowing)
BorkaBonum 4 years ago
Ofcourse it won't do good with AA
All hd2000 series cards choke with AA
ish718 4 years ago
I got better AA/AF results with my 2900XT than my friends 8800GTS 640mb (8xAA, 16xAF) so that's all biased crap based on the first drivers. And both of our cards are up to date, talking about drivers. He got slightly better general score due to the faster CPU though, 200p difference in 3dMark06.
BorkaBonum 4 years ago
download catalayst 7.9
sokec16 4 years ago
Got Catalyst 7.10
BorkaBonum 4 years ago
Wow where you playing on Mega easy?
orbit1010 4 years ago
Difficulity only makes the enemies resist more damage and do more damage, the AI is as ever as static so there's no need to have higher diff. than Regular. In the aging F.E.A.R we saw living AI, these are just dolls sitting around shooting at you in floods, which is as bad as all previous MoH and CoD games.
BorkaBonum 4 years ago
I was suprised because I thought it would run like shit on my PC, but it's quite playable.
MadcapMan 4 years ago
I get an average of 25fps with my 7600gt, 2xAA, full AF and other settings full, on 1024x768.
MadcapMan 4 years ago
lol im getting better fps i have 2900xt and a crappy 3800+x2
ik9111 4 years ago
Please keep in mind Fraps consumes quite alot of power when recording, in this title that consumation was at 50%.
BorkaBonum 4 years ago
Man, you sux :P
Nice video, rate and comment my videos too XD
Spetznaz 4 years ago
its not letting me change my resolution cause of something with directx and my video card maybe cause its old?
whiteblood10 4 years ago
the mic voice sounds like jack bauer.
seopeter22 4 years ago
i do not like how the radio sounds
whiteblood10 4 years ago
were can i get this demo?? im in australia so i kinda need an aus site
Blober112 4 years ago
Scrap that comment,found it lol good video your a pritty good gamer
Blober112 4 years ago
The game looks pretty good i think i wish my computer i just built would work its got the same specs but different brands and i have the 5200+ x2. Do you know what i can do to fix my build?
gunzkevin 4 years ago
My monitor displays the message no signal, the fans on everything run and my monitor works after i did some stuff in settings on my laptop but i cant get to settings unless i format my drive and i cant format my drive if i cant see its so dang confusing if you know what to do or ne1 for that matter can u plz reply to this message. I think the graphics look pretty good in this game doesnt seem like iraq though yeah like u said tho mp in this seems like it would be fun.
gunzkevin 4 years ago