"In his set of 555 sonatas, more are slow than fast, and many are quite poetic, nostalgic, and even dreamy, very much in the Bel Canto style." When I read that quote about 35 years ago I couldn't believe that anyone would say that. Roughly 400 of the 555 are marked "Allegro" or faster.
@anthony223 To fond the CD just google "Vladimir Horowits Plays Bach, Scarlatti, and Mozart". It will be a black CD with him on the cover. (YouTube seems to have a problem with me posting direct links to other things.
When you play a series of notes that quickly, they need to be very staccato and that's where the harpsichord is better suited. Other than that they really are apples and oranges.
Listen to all you stupid harpsichord defenders and music purists. You harpsichord fans sure have an inferiority complex when it comes to the piano. Get over it, it sounds great on piano.
@Chakiejan just remember without the harpsichord we would not have the early piano then and now the modern piano. So be grateful for it's historical invention at least.
ain't no suppose to it .It was written for harpsichord.I don't know if this music was published for anyone but the queen it was for -essecizi must mean something.Anyway did dis dude write any string music or opera?He had to do more than write 550 K E Y B O A R D sonatas.clavecin,dulcimer,lute harpsichord all sound diff but play it on anything you like.Dudes back in da day say 1730 didn't care what you did u could transpose it or reset it fo' udder instro-mints. u peeps need to chill.
Horowitz' paino version obviously has some rubato and crescendo and diminuendo that the computer harp version does not. I really like both to be honest, the harpsichord version is very cool! Sounds beautiful on the harp too.
@123pelerin I agree. It's a lovely piece of music but it was written for the harpsichord and is better suited to that instrument. The same is true for some of Mozart's keyboard music which sounds good on the piano but even better on the harpsichord.
"In his set of 555 sonatas, more are slow than fast, and many are quite poetic, nostalgic, and even dreamy, very much in the Bel Canto style." When I read that quote about 35 years ago I couldn't believe that anyone would say that. Roughly 400 of the 555 are marked "Allegro" or faster.
werderwayne1 2 months ago
learning this at the moment for my exam :/
micckkyyyy 3 months ago
I invite you to see Scarlatti - Sonata in G - Dame Myra Hess (1895-1965).
theUroshman 7 months ago
Such a gleeful piece! also horowitz was the man
forscyvus 9 months ago
The version played on the MOOG is interesting....but, for the purists--this is superb
AnyPortInTheStorm 10 months ago
hello, which cd is this taken from? thank you kindly
anthony223 10 months ago
@anthony223 To fond the CD just google "Vladimir Horowits Plays Bach, Scarlatti, and Mozart". It will be a black CD with him on the cover. (YouTube seems to have a problem with me posting direct links to other things.
pnoguy1103 10 months ago
I think this is a very nice interpretation, not definitive, but it's nice to hear something different, especially from Horowitz.
NotHomelessAnymore 11 months ago
The Harpsichord version is better.
MarSwanlake 11 months ago
What a wonderful instrument, to be able to do repeated notes that fast. Such a clean, exciting and inspiring performance.
Lorinweiss 1 year ago
Even here I found some haters…
Poor Planet Earth!
:(
I love Piano and Harpsichord. I love Scarlatti and that's all!!!
hibernatus 1 year ago 3
When you play a series of notes that quickly, they need to be very staccato and that's where the harpsichord is better suited. Other than that they really are apples and oranges.
userjoe1020 1 year ago
this is the best piano rendition i have heard of this piece.. well done Horowitz!
blackbird4321 1 year ago
well speaking as someone who knows nuthing about nuthin ... he's good ... i put him on par with mozart so there
c3smom 1 year ago
Listen to all you stupid harpsichord defenders and music purists. You harpsichord fans sure have an inferiority complex when it comes to the piano. Get over it, it sounds great on piano.
Chakiejan 1 year ago 6
@Chakiejan also sounds great your mother azzhole!
noospaseisde 1 year ago
@Chakiejan sounds great on both instruments
bilhernia 1 year ago
@bilhernia I think the harpsichord sounds terrible. Like the bagpipes of keyboard instruments. Thank god we have pianos nowadays.
Chakiejan 1 year ago 3
@Chakiejan I beg to the differ,I think the harpsichord has a nicer sound.It sounds sharper and not blund like the piano
littleasshole26 11 months ago
I think you're stupid. The harpsichord is better.
MarSwanlake 4 months ago
@Chakiejan just remember without the harpsichord we would not have the early piano then and now the modern piano. So be grateful for it's historical invention at least.
somnynightin78 2 months ago
ain't no suppose to it .It was written for harpsichord.I don't know if this music was published for anyone but the queen it was for -essecizi must mean something.Anyway did dis dude write any string music or opera?He had to do more than write 550 K E Y B O A R D sonatas.clavecin,dulcimer,lute harpsichord all sound diff but play it on anything you like.Dudes back in da day say 1730 didn't care what you did u could transpose it or reset it fo' udder instro-mints. u peeps need to chill.
lovesGenet 1 year ago
Good...Lord.... I didn't think a piano would even PLAY with someone playing that fast.
musicman69123 1 year ago
I like it, but I like it better on the harpsichord. Some Scarlatti Sonata's sound better on piano, some on harpsichords
Tenifus 1 year ago
this is supposed to be played in the harpsichord...
divine604 1 year ago
I wanna play this piece so bad D:
4evaFanFuruba 1 year ago
Piano sounds so blah on this piece.
Huddiethegreat 2 years ago 4
No baroque Harpsichord no baroque music...
noospaseisde 2 years ago 4
@noospaseisde so true
moneyjr1122 1 year ago
@noospaseisde you're so stupid, it's making me stupid just responding to your stupidity.
Chakiejan 1 year ago 2
@Chakiejan yeap, you are stupid!
noospaseisde 5 months ago
@noospaseisde INDEED, HE'S STUPID.
MarSwanlake 4 months ago
Horowitz' paino version obviously has some rubato and crescendo and diminuendo that the computer harp version does not. I really like both to be honest, the harpsichord version is very cool! Sounds beautiful on the harp too.
r4a2m0o 2 years ago
I love this version! Much better than my harpsichord version.
smalin 2 years ago
The brilliance of Horowitz dazzles us but conceals the structure, while your version allows us to see the machinery at work!
bergk1mp 2 years ago
Listening to the piano version, there's something lacking compared to the harpsichord rendition, I think,
123pelerin 2 years ago 9
True, it does sound a bit modernized, but it's still beautiful nonetheless :D
jasonextreme 2 years ago
@123pelerin I agree. It's a lovely piece of music but it was written for the harpsichord and is better suited to that instrument. The same is true for some of Mozart's keyboard music which sounds good on the piano but even better on the harpsichord.
vonkvetch 1 year ago
@123pelerin
Agreed, with gusto.
polymath7 1 year ago
@123pelerin I think that the harpsichord offers a warmth and fullness of sound that the piano cannot produce.
InbictaProductionzZ 9 months ago
La migliore esecuzione di questa sonata in assoluto : brillante , alla scarlatti ...
papore1 2 years ago