Added: 3 years ago
From: wpsu
Views: 1,430
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (25)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • love it, keep on posting :)

  • yes agreed, one should find out how many dollars the UN has spent trying to promote AGW in order to pass global carbon taxes

    who pays those taxes? the US

    who collects those taxes? the UN

    the IPCC was created by whom? the UN

    wow, difficult math huh?

  • The role of humans in climate change: nothing! This is simple.

  • @tubetib Fossil fuel and other carbon based energy use such as natural gas for home heating and cooling, cars, public transportation. Fossil fuel is the number 1 driver of climate change. The second believe it or not is beef consumption which drives the effect of methane increases. These are the anthropological climate change drivers. Who stands to lose on this? all of us, but oil industry has the most money of those affected. Oil is interested in denying to protect its filthy pockets.

  • have someone any proof of antropological global warming?

  • @belegulo

    Proof is not a scientific term. There is no proof for evolution (which is a reason why so many creationists think they are right). There is certainty - and it is over 90% certain that humans are changing the climate.

    Beware of the denial machine. A recent analysis by the Center for Responsive Politics evaluates the amount of industry finance that has gone into obfuscating scientific conclusions to politicians is seven times the money from the environmental lobby.

  • @Herecomesthefatlady Agreed, in fact, one should find out how many dollars oil has spent on the US chamber of commerce lobbying against climate change while attempting to delay moving to cleaner sourced energy - all the while saying they are all for clean energy...these lies deserve to be rejected with ferocity. Use your head and understand the true causes, effects and interests.

  • Great video.

    It is sad so many think of this as hoax and dismiss the science behind the process.The more I read the comments the more I think America has no understanding of science and that their opinions change the true facts or that maybe prayer will fix the problem.

    This is not a political or issue of religion. It is science and science trumps opinion every time.

  • The world for the last tens years has been getting cooler, Arctic ice is the thickest its been for ten years, check the facts, we are over you alarmist bed wetters spreading your crap, the games up, and the bad science that the global warming scam was founded on is the only thing going into meltdown..

  • @utesonline Please present a peer reviewed scientific record that makes your case.

    Oh! That's right, you cannot because all the data that has been peer reviewed and is truly factual debunks your opinion.

    Just sayin'

  • And why have I not been given a Ph.D for never believing this horse crap (no pun intended) LOL.

  • Are they forgetting that Carbon Dioxide is also consumed by plants. Carbon dioxide is used by plants during photosynthesis to make sugars, its needed for plant growth and development.

  • And the changes that are coming will not depend on our decisions they will depend on the sun. Hasn't Galileo and Copernicus taught you dumb bastards anything?

  • Who are they?

  • Did you spot the bullshit in the first minute? Never before has this happened. Yes it happens quite frequently. The earth has been so much warmer in the past. Why doesn't this turd bring that up? We are in a cooling period, possibly entering another ice age and some shithead is squawking about warming. My advice to Londeners is to buy snowplows and not piss away your money on fleeting fantasies. And keep your Duke and his Rottweiler away from the new world, we don't need your castoffs.

  • Comment removed

  • Horse ploppies? from you you horses ass.

  • The tilt of the Earth's axis gives us summer and winter. Global climate change is caused by the wobble of the Earth's axis, not human industry. First of all, C02 levels are just 0.038 percent. Water vapor and argon make up nearly 2 percent, the rest is nitrogen (80 percent) and oxygen (28 percent). He's an idiot.

  • @AcePilot101 people in glass houses should not throw stones, genius wannabe.

  • This video was better than the Al Gore hysteria; but I'm still not convinced. Among other things: (1) a 25 meter sea level rise! 75 feet! because of melting ice?;(2) an ethical question! What about the ethics of spending $1.5 to 3 trillion with the potential of no payoff! and (3) as constructive criticism, I would do more to address the cost of inaction vs. the cost of action (but at least you mention this, unlike Al Gore).

  • Idiot!!!

  • The oceans emit and absorb 30 times mor CO2 than the human emissions, and human can't possibly increase the CO2 concentration more than 5-10 percent. Scientists in chemistry say this and IPCC didn't care about instrumental measuring record of atmospheric CO2 showing 400 ppm between 1930 and 1940 (a concentration level which abruptly falled according to these measurement equipments).

  • What an idiot. Yes, clean and healthy CO2 would smell as hell if it was horse sh*t! :-)

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more