Wow nice job showing us you don't know shit. Tal only had a 2-game lead lifetime against Fischer, and no wins against Fischer after 1959. There is nothing to suggest Fischer was "less skilled" than ANY of those players. He was the youngest player to qualify for the Candidates, the youngest to become GM, and one of youngest WC ever at age 29.
Also, If Capablanca thought Lasker as superior it certainly didn't prevent him from winning the WC from him in 1921. You fail.
In the past our teachers were always the grandmasters and worldchampions, nowadays our teachers are the computers. They play , solve and compose . So have a look at youtube.com :
Great British player Alexander said once Botvinnik wrote 1. c2-c4 on his scoresheet he(Alexander) felt like resigning ! The Patriarch was so powerful.
Though Alexander did beat him once in a GB-USSR match.
1. Kasparov
2. Alekhine
3. loser
4. loser
5. loser
etc
nataschmidtt 4 months ago
All chess players and grandmasters agree that 1.Kasparov 2.Karpov and the others are arguable
KnightOnE5Square 7 months ago
Wow nice job showing us you don't know shit. Tal only had a 2-game lead lifetime against Fischer, and no wins against Fischer after 1959. There is nothing to suggest Fischer was "less skilled" than ANY of those players. He was the youngest player to qualify for the Candidates, the youngest to become GM, and one of youngest WC ever at age 29.
Also, If Capablanca thought Lasker as superior it certainly didn't prevent him from winning the WC from him in 1921. You fail.
PrUnEJuIcEtHeThIrD 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In the past our teachers were always the grandmasters and worldchampions, nowadays our teachers are the computers. They play , solve and compose . So have a look at youtube.com :
/watch?v=mwYQRteeHbE
Moremover 1 year ago
no... botvinnik is the best ever
AntiUmah 2 years ago
1 fischer 2 alekhine 3 capablanca 4 spasski 5 petrossian 6 morphy 7 anatoly karpov 8 gary kasparov 9 tal 10 botvinnik
TRUEMAN8919 2 years ago
@TRUEMAN8919
Lasker dominated them all.
Botwinnik, Alekhine and Capablanca all regarded him as superior to themselves.
Fischer was far less skilled then Kasparov, Karpov or Tal. Tal crushed him multipe times even with health problems.
Petrosian defeated an aged and unambitous Botvinnik. Smyslow also was better then Petrosjan or Botwinnik.
schusterlehrling 2 years ago
@schusterlehrling agree Lasker is the best!
FDGOD74 1 year ago
Comment removed
PrUnEJuIcEtHeThIrD 1 year ago
@TRUEMAN8919 agreed on all except Morphy higher than Spassky at 4 then the rest is accurate to me. Fischer is still the best all rounder.
ronoman88 1 year ago
What is the year?
Hektorxxx 2 years ago
...did somebody just try to rush up to the board and attack one of the players in the Botvinnik-Petrosian clip?!
youvebeenthunderstru 2 years ago
The greatest of them all.
GlorifiedTruth 2 years ago 2
Great British player Alexander said once Botvinnik wrote 1. c2-c4 on his scoresheet he(Alexander) felt like resigning ! The Patriarch was so powerful.
Though Alexander did beat him once in a GB-USSR match.
ChessChat 2 years ago
nice to see the young smyslov and tal.
jeffwads 4 years ago 2
He's a man in the history of chess...
regoralo 4 years ago
Historico y valioso!
YTM021807 4 years ago