Added: 3 years ago
From: thonglb123
Views: 166,947
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (360)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Too much agressive¡¡

  • YO, the bassoon(s) is(are) late at 2:38 !! oh snap!

  • Is it just me, or the orchestration is real thin in the third movement?

  • IDA HAENDEL- THE TRUE MASTER OF SIBELIUS CONCERTO!

  • As i expected another Powerfull and amasing Interpretation from lovely Sarah Chang,it looks like that she has a special Enterance to a hidden unvisible Dimention of Infinit Music Worlds,wich are definitly not reachable for another Human Bings so easily,Genius like,(Sahrah Chang,A.S.Mutter,Hilary Hahn and many others),have allready been having this Tallent deeply in their Subconscious,(the Instinkt of Mother Natur),as they was borned,this is a cosmological Low,Thanks all of you

  • the strings of her heart plays beautiful music

  • The BEST Sibelius I have ever heard. Utmost respect to Sarah.

  • She's not a bad violinist by any means...she does kinda use her bow like a saw though.

  • @SteelyPhil37 well, consiering the song, that's kind of reasonable

    she is relly gradeful in some of the more romantic songs (meditation from thais, salut d' amor)

  • I don't understand how can there be people who dislike this performance.

    Well ....

  • So many people are jealous of her... as for me, her performance is truly amazing.

  • until now i was not real full blast classical music fan and after, sarah's sofia sibelius performance -26.10.2011. i think i know better...

  • Es maravillosa pero yo prefiero a Benjamin Beilman, es simplemente maravilloso, pulcro en cada nota, su sonido y afinación son extraordinarios!!! y qué de la musicalidad??? fuera de serie

  • See my channel for the complete performance in a single video, and in better quality. There's even a direct link to the third movement in the description if that's all you fancy.

  • 1:23 LOL

  • @IlEtaitUneForet project runway anyone?

  • Who's this conductor guy? He was completely lost at around 2:30, caused the bassoons complete chaos and came in a beat late, omitted a beat, then landed on the D downbeat in a hurry, I've never seen a major screw up like this by an orchestra of this level. Orchestra's at this level don't need conductors, all he was doing was beating the crap out of the orchestra anyway and he even screws that up so badly, what a shame.

  • Scratchy? It's not because she cannot play pretty, she plays how she wants it to be heard. If you don't like it, shut up and go listen to what you want.

  • And all this in 5 inch heels. :D

  • prefere fanny clamagirand au mont carlo masters

    elle est plus musicale

  • OMGGGGGGGG the artificial harmonicssss DROOOOLLLLL

  • Not only aggressive, but also BRUTAL and MERCILESS!! God damn it, She is a BEAST lol

    Sarah sometimes does this.... I think she has sadistic tendency... :p

    Her inner nature can easily overpower even the original conductors intention and tonal language.

  • I like her but I think that this is super aggressive! I suppose that this movement is the exciting finale but I feel like she hacks away a ton in places she could have been more musical?

    THIS IS SUPPOSE TO BE A POLONAISE FOR POLAR BEARS! Imagine polar bears dancing to this version. They'd slip and fall ;)

  • She nailed it.

  • Check out the version Batiashvili which is much better to me, more musical, more precisely played as well ( both violin and orchestra part).

  • Intonation...

  • hmmm....she can play all the notes, but it's like she threw all her sense of sound out the window. she kinda hammers at this piece and my ears aren't so happy. i think the problem with sarah chang is that she's more concerned with looking impressive while she's performing, without much regard for what sound she's producing. i mean, try watching hilary hahn's version of sibelius when she was 17 on youtube. she has so much poise even at that age compared to sarah now, and her sound is perfect.

  • @lee4ivy I agree with you: the sound is scratchy sometimes, and is a little bit agressive, and there are some notes out of tune... but I think she's just being carried away by her feelings and emotions. You can never tell how you are going to react on stage. Hilary Hahn's rendition is more accurate in the sense that she doesn't miss a note, but if you ask me, her interpretation is so boring I could fall asleep with this movement which Ida Haendel describes as a Dance macabre. No ofence to Hahn!

  • @lee4ivy lot of jeoulsy to Sarah. It is insult to Sarha compare to Hillary and etc. Hillary is still learning and try to correct every part not a level of interpreting............... Naturally born vs. practiced

  • sarah IS a prodigy and good interpreter, but here you can't tell cuz she focuses all her energy on the flourish and not much on technical aspects; all i hear is sawing noises, wobbly vibratos, major intonation issues, and hysterical high notes. you don't get a gist of her great interpretation BECAUSE she couldn't execute it. as for hilary, her playing's so subtle, almost internal/personal, and a careful listener could totally fall in love once hooked. not all great interpreters have to be showy.

  • @lee4ivy Try hearing her Bruch, her Saint-Saens and Lalo (Both concerts on YouTube and albums) in those she sounds like a real virtuoso

  • @lee4ivy ditto. you can't deny her talent, but she's better at slow romantic stuff. i'm a HUGE sarah fan like many others, but to be frank, her playing here SUCKS. i've listened to countless recordings and know this piece inside out but this made my ears literally ache. it's way out of tune and so unrefined. BUT that does NOT mean i love her any less, so sarah fans, let's get real here: if you've never heard this piece before, go listen to the recording for a while, and THEN come back & compare.

  • @TheDeviltrace I love this performance. My favorites are the ones by ginette neveu and hilary hahn - but I love this one too, it's so exciting! I think her crashing down on the strings and sawing at the strings are part of her expressive technique - bowstrokes very characteristic of her. that's just the way she expresses the music. It's not a polished, perfect sound like heifetz's but her musicmaking is always daring, confident and totally uninhibited.

  • @lee4ivy I concur!

  • Look up Benjamin Beilman's version, his is definitely the best.

  • for me this sounds like cabaret concerto, i don't like her version but i think she''s so great.

  • This is not a very good performance at all actually. In fact, it's surprisingly bad.

  • There are definitely quite a few scratchy, distorted-sounding areas throughout this.

  • I like the 1935 recording of heiftetz and Beecham, elsewhere on Youtube.

  • Why do you comment? It's subjective.....

  • Really wonderful violinist! I can hear honesty in her music. My favorite violinist from now on.

  • not bad

  • Chang sometimes holds the violin so that the bow is highly skewed. As a result the sound sometimes drops and the sound quality deteriorates.

  • tehnica si exprisevitate.....super!

  • can anyone see the face at 4:49? behind sarah chang?

  • @commentsviewing Lol you mean the giant lego robot looking thing?

  • can anyone see the face at 4:49?

  • Rhythm? 

  • She´s great! Her performance is very passionate, even though her playing isn´t as effortless as, let´s say, Ferras´. I also like a lot the conducting starting at 4:34 :)

  • She finished with a E and not with D jaja

  • Don't even get into the comments of Menuhin. Other top conductors like Karajan had the utmost reverance for Mutter or Perlman's or Oistrakh or Jeifetz' or Bell's or Hahn's playing. Every conductor has their preference. At the end of the day, it comes down to one's taste.

  • absolutely marvelous!

  • There's no doubt that she's very capable but her playing is so scratchy so often. And before someone gives me a diatribe about how it's solely because of the emotion that she's pouring into it, I realize that, but she could use that reckless abandon far more effectively if she uses it more sparingly and get a cleaner sound out of that Guarneri.

  • @aPMism its not that she doesnt get a clean sound. she has a very good sound. its more that she has developed this sort of "style" for herself over many years, which is very robust and heavy, and its sort of her trademark. its doesnt sound scratchy without a tone behind it; there is always tone there. her playing is very consistent throughout a piece too; never extremely smooth or extremely rough. it is not easy to do what she does, even if she doesnt sound a "clean" as you would like her too.

  • @aPMism and i agree with you about the emotion thing. theres not really much "emotion" shown through roughness, except maybe anger? but i think its more sarah's way of being her own violinist and stamping something with her style. im a fan.

  • #1 Violinist in the world, Sarah Chang, Korean American.

  • @Mayplestory1 n1 x10000000000000000000000000000­000000000000000000000000000000­000000000000000000000000000000­000000000000000000000000000000­0000000000000!! absolutly agree with you

  • I think Sarah's version is best

  • To all haters: How can Hilary Hahn a cold (though technically good) clinical performer can compare to fiery, skilled and expressive violinist like Sarah who Lord Yehudi Menuhin called "the most wonderful, the most perfect, the most ideal violinist I have ever heard".? hmmm?

  • so weak, no strenth at all , she counld hold most of the phrases. her timing is poorly. I hardly feel her emotion without watching the video and seeing her face. she couldn't dominante the orchestra completely. absolutely terrible. She was just more superior than the other kids when she was a child. However, she is not at the same level with other violinists who have the same amount of fame or even less. she doesn't deserve the fame she got.

  • Sarah is best.

  • lol the face she does at exactly 5:22...... she looks up at the camera like '' sh*t ! ''

  • une des plus belles interprétations

    quelle émotion avec la perfection en plus

    quelle grace et sensualité

    jm de heredia

  • really hate her vibrato. and i wonder why she sounds so cratch even though she's clearly capable of a huge range of tones and colors.

  • I am a great admirer of Sarah Chang but this was not as fine a performance as some others I have heard; although admittedly only on disc. I don't think the nordic quality of Sibelius's music suits Sarah's style. One of her heroes is David Oistrakh and he plays this concerto with a brilliance which she, nor anybody else, can't hope to match. However, I am scheduled to see Sahra perform the Max Bruch in April and nobody plays it better than her. In the romantic

    repertoire she's unbeatable

  • 4:47 ->  [o_o]

  • oh my god take it easy at 1:15. scratch scratch on the most glorious part of the whole movement

  • Also considering Hilary Hahn is using technique all fingered octaves in the entire performance makes this one look like a student rendition... By the way, having the Royal Concertgebouw Orkest helps you sound good -- she's not good anything. Her time is over -- I don't think she was ever good...

  • @cageynerd Here we are again Mr. Cageynerd... Remember me from Sarah's version of Air on a Gstring? well have you uploaded any of YOUR own videos to prove your better than Sarah? I guess not YOU SUCK

  • the conductor looks like the guy in the Princess Diary movie, the queen's assistant

  • Her final note: Eb

    jaja

  • You have too much for learn from musicians like Kavakos. Music isn't just a perfect technique.

  • i was just watching the mendelssohn violin concerto and sarah grew so much since then D; she sounds amazingg!!

  • Wow.When u hear a younger Hanh invest this concerto with her mind and soul and she has less trouble playing it.Much more secure. HAHN is a gift!!!

  • gotta love Sarah's rendition.

  • I love this. There must be some controversies on better one between Hahn and Chang. It's ridiculous. Hahn's work is like a text book technically. But I (and most music loving people) don't want to hear some outstanding pupil's performance who teaches me the right way to "play violin". We want a new interpretation which might be different with the composers intention. This uncertainty or creative re-construction of the plot is the one we thirst for and Chang did well undoubtedly.

  • Sarah is my favourite violinist and her Sibelius is my favourite video of all!!!! I really liked the beginning =).

    Sibelius is also very great.

  • This is easily the most eletrifying version of Sibelius I have ever seen or heard. The surge of passion and hysteria superbly complemented with chilling pathos of "emotional turbulence" as pppsssssssss so eloquently puts it, makes this performance truly exciting. Sarah's virtuosity is simply astounding, but it's her red-blooded musicality that goes straight to the heart of the music.

  • This is proper live music making. Risks are taken. She communicates and interpets the music. Great tone colours and subtle shifts in tempi. Wonderful. I've watched the Hahn version and quite franky it sounds like a note perfect teenager who has rehearsed the piece to death but has nothing to say about it. It sounds robotic and boring. I'm not bothered about Chang's stage presence. This is high art not the X Factor.

  • @john1951w hahn was only 17 !! I want to hear you play it like hahn wirth 17...I like them both, Sarah and Hilary...

  • sarah is great and i love her playing but she really should work on her stage presence. she comes across as very fake. and i think in part due to her appearance. the hair, makeup, and dress are all so unflattering and un-elegant. she needs a stylist.

    the performance was great though

  • @hodgrix are you kidding? she looks gorgeous. And if we're talking about something as shallow as stage presence, she's very animated and her emotions show in her movements. What more could you want?

  • @zachpiano yea i guess ur right, i think its just the asian thing u know?

  • @hodgrix that's funny, because I think she looks always so perfect and elegant, that I asked myself, if she has a stylist. And I always admire her stage presence, it still can't be more natural I think *_* you don't just see the happiness and energy - you FEEL it. She's so amazing 8)

  • @pathetiqueous yea ur right. i was just being a hater when i wrote that comment lol.

    i love sarah

  • @hodgrix ummm...what? in-elegant?? Which fashion shows do you goto?

  • @canzo0378 slightly on the trashy side

  • Ihana esitys ja solisti.

  • what is so good about hilary.. sarah eats her for snack. do not mention hilary. sarah is the real prodigy.

  • I'm suprised I've never seen her break a string. She plays so strongly and passionately on that thing and it's amazinggggg

  • this performance is already at the peak of its maturity... just imagine how much more intense it would be if she played it 30 years later, with more experience...

  • Bien sûr beaucoup de talent , mais c'est pas la version que je préfère

  • i love sarah chang so much but to be honest, this performance wasn't the best.

  • Sloppy performance.

  • What a temperament ! :D

  • i don't like her sound... I don't like her. I was at her concert a few years ago, she played Mendelssohn concerto. I was shocked that she made only big show, not MUSIC. And she didn't feel anything, she was playing like she wanted audience to admire her... I think she isn't good musician. Hilary is better!

  • EPIC

  • Ach, too much scratchy sound

    Well, playing passionately and making scratchy sound should be differentiated.

  • I just love the way she smiles at the end!!!! :-)

  • sarah chang is an excellent violinist... however, this is a horrible rendition. she's probably having an off day but i've heard alot better. my favourite performances would be by susanne hou and david oistrakh. especially the susanne hou rendition.

  • maybe she has to play with so many faults to convey emotions?

    it definitely sounds different from a 'clean' version

  • @purbanegoro Really?! It's one thing to be constructive, but being completely immature and idiotic is quite another. Do you listen to what she is playing? This performance is brilliant as is the soloist. If you going to post something like that, why comment?

  • i dont kno how these people endure it !! -_-... for me i get freakin tired after playing only the first movement.. My guess is playing grand concertos like this one is not only a technical challenge but also a "fitness test" lol

  • 4:11.....wow. the power and emotion is overwhelming (in a good way!). she's AMAZING.

  • wow...so cold.......but thats why I love it

  • So intense!!!

  • I adore Sarah's performance of this concerto. She plays with a lot of passion and musicality. She is a true inspiration for young violinists. In music, I can feel her strong personality.

  • Great perfomance. Does anybody know the opusnumber?

  • Sarah Chang & Wen Wei THE BEST QUALITY , EXPRESSION AND TECHNIQUE for Sibelius Concerto (i've listened to Perlman, Oistrakh and many others performing this, but the full achieve is worthy of Sarah!)

  • @nemmo82 Hows Gil Shahams?

  • @purbanegoro Don't be jealous of east asian musicians. Everyone acknowledges Oistrakh or Stern's legacy but times change. Sarah Chang, Hilary Hahn, Joshua Bell are the defining faces of today's classical music. What's the point of comparing them to Oistrakh? How about comparing them to Vivaldi or Paganini?

  • @purbanegoro Is that what you have to say to the world? "Ching Chong clone"? Do you really know how offensive and racist that remark is? What you say doesn't tarnish her performance and im pretty sure nobody agrees with your statement. You're only making yourself appear to everyone else as an ignorant racist bigot. You sir are racially closeminded, and I hope one day you realize how pathetic that is. We can only hope you don't contribute to the overall gene pool.

  • @purbanegoro Perhaps you should pull yourself out of that hole you are living in and stop referring to a person of Korean descent as a 'ching' chong'.

  • @purbanegoro It would be hard for you to distinguish any real music from not so good ones wearing that Ku-Klux-Klan hood over your ignorant dumb head. I thought your tribes live in the woods marching around the fire and burning crosses. Since when did KKK start listening to art music?? Maybe you guys got bored of those drum roles, but your ear is still not so sophisticated.

  • at the end she lough so beatiful !!! i love it !

  • i hope people just hear the music, instead of seeing what ethnicity or race the performers are...

  • How come sumtimes she is so beautiful..and sumtimes is so freaking fat ugly woman..ZZ

  • Both are wonderful, but I have to say that Hillary is an Angel and her music is Heaven.

  • The harmonics are great! So incredibly beautiful :)

  • this piece has the hardest bowings ever!

  • Some people prefer HIlary Hahn's 17year old performance of this, but when I listen to that version, I don't hear the emotional turbulence and final jubilant resolution that I hear in Sarah's version. Sarah creates so many more different colors with her sound which results in the conveyance of so many emotions. With Sarah's performance/interpretation, it's like you're on a journey with her and she's showing you everything whereas with Hilary, Hilary is telling you the story.

  • @pppsssssssss your not the first to be left a bit cold by ms hahn. i agree here too.. this performance is very passionate.. hahn more clinical

  • @pppsssssssss with her scratchy ugly sound you mean...

  • @jasonform what you hear on the recordings/tv shows is much different than what you hear out in the hall. I'm assuming you haven't seen Sarah live in concert? I've watched her 5 separate times and the sounds I heard in the hall were all very full, lush, and silk-like...all of the scratchiness evaporates...

    On another note, I've heard Gil Shaham 5 feet away rehearsing and he had a "scratchy tone" as well...but out in the hall, the sounds were so beautiful

  • @pppsssssssss It's called 'super-articulation'

  • @pppsssssssss

    i saw hilary play this live at tanglewood this season

    it was amazing live much better than this performance of sarah chang

  • @pppsssssssss I think that people who don't know much about violin or music like Hillary's version more. I will concede this Hilary practices like a fiend and as a result has amazing control and a phenominal technical acumen. Also her (Hilary) intonation is spot on nearly all of the time. Sarah on the other hand has a deep and abiding understanding of the rudiments of music and knows exactly how to display the depths of her soul through her fingers.

  • @pppsssssssss WOW, you're very eloquent and concise! Nobody could have said it better than you, thanks! I completely agree with you, Hahn's playing is too robotic. She just plays the notes, but she doesn't express(or convey) the EMOTION with which the composer intended this piece to be played.

    But this completely BLOWS me away, it just gives me GOOSEBUMPS!! I recently auditioned for AGT and in the application I wrote "Sarah Chang" when they asked who my professional role model is.

  • this rendition annoys me. The Hillary Hahn play is correct

  • the scratchy bow is the fault of the tempo being too fast,, the conductor is pushing the orchestra too much thus she is pushing to keep up, listen to the slower tempo parts, she plays perfectly

  • actually at 2:15-2:16 she just took off and rushed hardcore thats why it did not sound together with the tympani.

  • @gnatural um...no

  • @McSplat i think you need to have a closer listen and maybe even listen to it with a metronome for a sec because on the 16th note runs, she clearly takes off ahead of the tympani. i know you like Sarah Chang very much and adore her but no artist is beyond reproach. every1 makes mistakes.

  • The edge you hear in the sound is a function of proper projection. If you stand right next to a soloist they will sound scratchy but if you go out in the hall the sound will be smooth and beautiful.

  • What a great crescendo at 3:09!!! Great spin on Sibelius's 3rd movement!! That's definetely not the original version. I like this!!!!

  • los agudos de SARAH CHANG despiertan a los olvidados en el tiempo, los graves, envuelven a las almas sedientas de alivio y calma vivificàndolas, los arqueos empuja con potencia y entusiasmo a las almas perezozas, agobiadas y pasivas levantàndolas con estupor y alegria.

    ¿que mas puede ser SARAH? que la misma redentora de aquellos que han percibido su talento, divinidad esa gracia que poseen los iluminados como CHANG en los universos de la eternidad.

    tito -argentina

  • Yikes. Love the passion and there's some stellar technique in there, but it actually does come a bit unhinged, in my opinion. Not that I (or anyone) could do better, but I prefer more tempo and control in the edge. Still a fantastic performance though - feels like she's flying by the seat of her pants, except you know she's Sara Chang, and that this is likely a technical walk in the park for her, so it's likely what she chooses to interpret at the moment.

  • Comment removed

  • Wonderful but a little scratchy and heavy on the bow but other than that the performance is brilliant?

  • She played that final movement exactly as it was meant to be played — as a single perfectly sustained imperative verb. I am overcome.

  • What a great analogy.  The continuous, insistent, ruthless forward movement is what is so hard to pull off in this movement. Very few play this so well.

  • So many jealous back seat drivers!!! Shame on you!!! This is one of the best. I would like to hear comments from Menuhi, Stern, or Levine!!!!!!

  • @rubinklee actually Menuhin already commented in her playing once he said :"the most wonderful, the most perfect, the most ideal violinist I have ever heard".

  • jerrytomball... small mistakes is understandable in live performance... but as greater the violinists are.. the smaller the mistakes must be.. she is a great violinist.. in a bad [TERRIBLE] day... maybe she didnt practice enough or idk... but its awful you cant deny it... listen to Hahn playing when she was 17!! .. much better than this :)

  • Or Sarah Chang herself on Paganini... She one time said (in a interview) that she use to play in two manners... The calm, maybe the right way (technically) and the passioned way... Maybe this is the case of the last one, I don´t know, I´m just guessing (Sorry my english, I´m learning)

  • Let's watch your version of this. I want to see and hear the way it really should be played.

  • @blumountainsage what a stupid commentary... im not a solist.. though i hear all the good solists playing, and if your ear and a crap, you can look up for any other famous violinist and you'll notice that her version is the worst

  • @BaRToLoMaSi I did...all I hear are notes, not music.

  • She is a gorgeously beautiful woman!

    But her violin playing is filled with faults everywhere! Too many to count. Maybe she should concentrate on less demanding pieces!?

  • WOWWOWOWOWOW!!!!!!!!!

  • Gives me chills every time I listen to this movement, especially when played well like this.

    Why do people waste so much time analyzing every little "mistake" in a live performance? Can they go back in time and fix it? Try not to miss the forest for the trees.

  • @jerrytomball well said!

  • Her shifts are unbelievably fast and clean!!!

  • Thanks for your high standard and positive comments, I really learn a lot from them.

  • Hearing her... watching her move... is a joy!

  • not only is she a great instrumentalist, she is also beauuutiful =)

  • Her violin, a battered spouse...

  • i prefer Hilary verson ...

  • that biting, consonant, articulate power just gets me every time. i don't know any other violinist that can maintain that perfect articulation so well throughout this entire movement. it's really better than words can even describe.

  • sometimes that bite annoys me tho, it makes it sound a bit unclean... in that respect i prefer hahn's version ^_^

  • it's definitely not for everybody, but for me, it's perfection.

  • I agree. She is perfect for me too. I love her music!

  • that bite is what makes this amazing

  • I mentioned the mistake at 2:36 before but when I think now I kinda get a suspicion that the wind section did it on purpose for Sarah scratching too much.

    And I think that the fast pace of rhythm may caused the scratchy sound.

  • what mistake?

  • No this was an honest mistake of the bassoons entering at 3 past rehearsal 8 one beat too late, and causing havoc for a second or too.

  • one more thing, just noticed that the conductor drops one beat at exactly 2;34, causing the bassoons to miscount. look carefully youll see he stays on the stays on the second beat one beat too long!

  • yea i didnt hear anything wrong at that part either?

  • Bombom bom bom bom booom~ changed to Bombbom bom bom boooom~