12th Comm' On 9/11 TV Fakery - Newtons Law

[FreedumbFighter28]

No planers are morons....

There stupid fucking morons who will believe ANYTHING. Its no wonder they fell for 911 in the first place. They fell for Ace Bakers lies and Simon Shacks quit edits....and now they have the nerve to fight there own because there precious theory has been debunked over and over again. If you are a no planer....kill yourself.

Love

28

[ratoig]

Idiotic, waste of time........... Who has said anything about holograms anyway.....

The explosion caused the building to sway. High winds do the same. So what??

[74pbg]

@dumbnetworks you do not think that any normal building would sway when hit by a Boing 767? This is normal, even the wind bring it to sway! And for those who think the camera is moving, look at the north tower doesn't sway!

[danawanapskana]

Secondly, it would not require a plane to make a building swing one direction or the next. The plane itself would not have been capable of traveling at this speed in this altitude range without breaking apart (but the plane is not a commercial jetliner anyway if you see the still images of it). I wonder if the aggressive wavelength display is intended to obscure some facet of the digital flaws, what the purpose of the strange overlaying 4x effect is (or does it just look unnatural more there)

[mikebeange]

@danawanapskana It's very possible for planes that big to fly that fast that low! Youtube is full of videos proving it so do some research instead of quoting all those stupid no-planers like Morgan Reynolds

[danawanapskana]

This whole things appears to be made from software. I have seen analysis of this video and shall look to see if can find it again. It has been a few years. The mirror image is off, the buildings have digital problems, the smoke is looped and unrealistic, the plane is not effective against realistic analysis though I do not recollect distinctly at this time analysis of its sounds. There was indeed available computer programs which simulated buildings which match up against this possibility.

[TheHMD93]

@keendreamer Most man made structures do not made rigid because they are not meant to be. Instead they are allowed to "bend" and shift. Alot of bridges naturally "bounce" due tot he tension caused by its own weight

[danawanapskana]

what is this supposed to prove? it feels as if i am being fed some evil lie. i don't like it for any forensic value at all except perhaps to a video experts professional analysis on this subject of fakery.

[roquefortfiles]

Instead of putting together stupid videos like this all you need to do is listen to Brian Clarke who survived this 2 floors above the impact. He said the entire tower leaned over in the direction you have here. So much so that he thought the tower was going to fall over.

[73849309378]

Well if it was a missile it probably would have swung too. So what is your point?

[drifter402]

@73849309378 i dont think it would.

[keendreamer]

The ENTIRE TOWER MOVED? so the impact actually bent the four collumn beams holding the tower up? or it knocked its face a little to the north? I doubt either one is true. Its more likely that the explossion from the BOMBS caused the ground to shake and it moved the CAMERA a little bit the the south. ???

[dumbnetworks]

@keendreamer so following your logic... Its more plausible that the whole ground moved which moved the building where the camera was then to believe that the tower moved because of the impact?

[keendreamer]

@dumbnetworks couldve been the camera moving, couldve been the building. either way it doesnt prove anything. explosives/bombs cause things to move right?

[dumbnetworks]

@keendreamer usually the simplest answer is the right one

[organisten]

no there was no hologram, but neither could the tower have "collapsed". It did exactly what it was designed to do if it were hit by a jet plane. Something else caused it to "collapse" 55 minutes later.

[LithuanianGuitar]

So which soundtrack is real for this video? Because the original version has a diffirent one lol.

[chibangin007]

if you watch the orignal footage, at 25-30, theres a huge gap where you can see the background through the second tower. you can see the blue background while the smoke rises. scott myers footage is 100% fake!

[beachcomber2008]

It SWUNG, it SWUNG.

[alawson911]

I can't believe that I have not commented on this video before now. It is a definitive requiem for the no planes-in-New York theorists.

Requiestat in Pace

[AndrewPete1989]

Thanks Achimspok,a very good example of 9/11 reality. I can sympathise with your detractors,as I watched 2nd hit live I was ready to blame the Govt.Then I became a Loose Changer,to a NPTheorist and so on through everything else,all the while researching. At this point I've gone full circle and I realise I WAS WRONG,the planes hit. The real conspiracy,of course,is did US Govt allow it to happen to justify war? Churchill did the same to Coventry in WW2,let it get bombed,"For the greater good".

[IExposeMormonism]

Almost,AP, Some kind of "Plane" hit the WTC. But not Flt175. And the reason for the confusion is valid. I don't think anyone studying it even for years can say what did hit the WTC. I have my ideas.But it wasn't a Boeing.

[VZGproductions]

But you do know that explosions can cause the same effect right?

Explosions can have as much force behind them as an actual object, just think about it. The explosion was on the left hand corner of the building and so it makes perfect sense for the building to be pushed upward and to the right.

I'm not a conspiracy nut or anything, I just want answers to these questions. So that is why I am going to keep questioning.

[wsee]

steel and concrete buildings do not swallow airliners whole...

the fucking fake plane does not even slow down while it's making it's entrance...

REAL PLANES DON'T DO THAT...

[Miko5000]

@wsee -

"do not swallow airliners whole"

And it didn't. The plane was ripped apart.

"the fucking fake plane does not even slow down while it's making it's entrance..."

Actually, it most certainly does.

/watch?v=GIZO-zY3Cug

You just say things without bothering to make sure if they're true or not. It's part 13 of this series.

[jesudel]

who are your plane witnesses, those computer degenerated people we all can see in some videos? or the witnesses who talked about a little plane? or the witnesses who said i saw something i don't know what it is? or the one who told i saw a cesna?

make poetry...

that's all man. bye, bye.

[achimspok]

bye bye

[Miko5000]

@jesudel

"those computer degenerated people we all can see in some videos?"

Hahahahaha! Computer degenerated... Of course you believe in the no plane theory, you're in the bottom 5%. All no planers are.

[AbuZubaydah]

No planers are the most pathetic people. They need assessments from mental health professionals, I am not comfortable with having insane people like this in free society.

[jesudel]

Pathetic, mental health, insane people... blah, blah, blah... All you are stupids if you think that your children are going to beleive the offical version when they will see what happened by theirselves.

Mental health professionals is what people who beleive that a plane crashed at the pentagon and chanceville need.

Dick Oliver (CNN):"Some people say they thought they saw a MISSILE".

Don Dahler (ABC): "I can only describe it like the sound of a MISSILE, not a propped plane".

Regards.

[nehorlavazapalka]

Prepare to drown yourself while vomiting.

[achimspok]

BOOHHHAAA HA HA, jesudel!

First you repeating a 1000 times that no plane was seen live... I know you talked about Don Dahler in the ABC studio.

Now you tell me what Don Dahler heard in the studio.

Hey, according to simonshack Don Dahler stared on an empty screen waiting for some Pffft Pffft to say OMG. You tell me he heard the sound of a missile?

Go! Buy you a paper hat and a red nose!

[jesudel]

You have the ABC record of Don Dahler voice at my channel, and he says so clearly that he is near the World Trade Center, at the street.

I don't understand why do you say that Don Dahler was at the ABC studio. It has no sense.

Who is talking about Simon Shack? Only you have mentioned Simon Shack. I'm using my own criterion. I've not mentioned Simon Shack at any moment as a reference here.

I'm starting to think that you are also a very bad disinformer, man.

Make poetry man.

[achimspok]

Oh I make poetry.

Yes, you are right. The anchore stared on the empty screen.

ABC 8:58

anchor: "there are continuing reports from people who say they saw an airplane. One woman saying she saw a jet going in. So again Don a jet screaming that low could be consitent with what you heard?"

Don Dahler: "Absolutely..."

You are a very bad disinformer.

[jesudel]

HAHAHA

Don Dahler is a news proffesional, and he of course was able to understand what was going on at that moment. He started telling "I can only describe it like the sound of a MISSILE, not a propped plane or anything like that". After he saw TV's were talking about planes, and eyewitness were appearing and saying other thing than he was, what was he going to do, to keep telling a missile? he sould be stupid xDD

[jesudel]

Man, you are disinforming.

Don Dahler distinguish clearly between a propped plane and a jet. He sayed so clearly "Not a propped plane or anything like that" He says a MISSILE. And after talking with the studio and knowing about the news, he says "may be a jet", but he says "not a propped plane".

He opens the possibility of a jet, but never a propped plane. There is an important difference.

[nehorlavazapalka]

STFU

[achimspok]

Notice: They talk about the first plane.

One more lie on my channel and you are banned, jesudel.

[jesudel]

You can't hide the evidences. People is not stupid. And you know it.

Who is telling to you how to respond? You seem to me clearly aidded by someone. You only know how to make videos, and that's all.

It's my opinion. please, don't delete it ;o)

Bye, bye, mr chimspok. And take my advise, you can, think about it, make poetry ;o)

[jesudel]

Oh, btw, and if you want to talk only about the second impact, Dick Oliver, on CNN, reporting from ground zero just after it, told that PEOPLE said they saw a missile.

Regards :o)

[achimspok]

CNN 9:09

Dick Oliver: "Jim, I don't know if other reconfirmed that this was an aircraft or to be more specific, some people said they saw a missile. I don't know how people could this differentiate but we might be..."

Dick obviously saw nothing. So just let's count the reports of people who saw a missile and people who saw a plane.

Of course, also people who saw nothing are "evidence" for "nothing hit the towers", right?

[jesudel]

you are so bad distorting (?-i don't know if its the word) what happened. people who saw nothing is also evidence, of course. may be if it was a big plane, they would saw it. but a little missile is more dificult to catch their attention.

dick is a news professional, who is doing his job seriously, and he says what people said they saw. as seriously as don dahler, who said he surely heared a missile.

it has no sense to say i saw a missile if i saw a BIG passengers plane.

[Xenomorph911WTC]

For some useful idots that may be the case, but for the NPT leaders, no, they can be caught at every turn lying. September Clues and Simonshack's every claim is a complete lie or omission of video evidence, there is no way this is an accident, it is an intentional disinformation campaign. These people work hard at pushing it, they are not dumb or insane, their campaign is often well-calculated, and they run multiple accounts out here to create the illusion they have followers. It's all a fraud.

[jesudel]

buuuuuuullllllshit xD

You are simply and dirty. I'm going to keep what I think so you can understand no more words of mine, hahaha.

[dimmiecaddie]

you choose that channel name and invoke MH Professionals for others?

We're all in the same soup, Einstein.

[nehorlavazapalka]

No, achimspok, you're wrong.

They used holograms, so they could kidnap the victims by pumping fentanil under their doors. They're currently being held as prisoners in secret prisons in eastern europe, south america and eastern australia (great coral reef).

They are badly mistreated, they face everyday slave work, rape and sleep deprivation (not because of the lights... :-).

The same goes for every witness who saw the incoming no-plane.

[nehorlavazapalka]

The pure helplessness! They can't even escape, because they would be labeled as lunatics -> detention in assylum (their families wouldn't recognize them).

(+ crocks in the basement)

You are denying their suffery with this frakin' video, pull ti down!

(the originial planes were sold along with the remaining fuel the next day, the money was used to pay the graphics and the fake witnesses)

[quantumflux432]

Could you fast forward these videos?

watch?v=6myZ2HlpxLQ&

watch?v=0K94NUtpGJw&

[achimspok]

1st a missile would punch a little hole without that much resistance that the whole tower sway.

2nd the best explanation for the flash seems to be the combination of super heated aluminum particles in addition with the crushed oxygen tanks

3rd the "black plane" (e.g. Foreman) is the result of the shadow cast by the smoke coming from the north tower

4th AA11 cast a shadow across the north face WTC1 including the shape of the wings

5th lots of witnesses

If every single detail points to a plane...

[EvilUSAandthe911Lie]

LOL!!! Are you serious?

Two little details you're leaving out:

(1) Hollow aluminum isn't stronger than steel.

(2) Most planes can't fly with half of a wing.

I'm glad I asked. Never assume! LOL!!!

[achimspok]

(1) You are absolutely correct because hollow aluminum isn't stronger than steel BUT several tons of fast aluminum cannot simply stop.

(2) no plane can fly with one wing. The only way planes appear to do it is in re-re-re-compressed low quality interlaced videos.

I'm glad you asked.

[EvilUSAandthe911Lie]

LOL!!!

No you're not.

[achimspok]

...why should I think about missiles?

The effort to fake a plane-picture above a real missile would be tremendous and on single missed photograph would render the whole plot void.

Imo it would be possible to fake it imperceptible BUT impossible in advance and impossible in the time frame between the event and the broadcasting.

[jesudel]

THIS VIDEO WAS NOT BROADCASTED LIVE. To insert a faked plane here is so simple.

What was broadcasted LIVE was a computer degenerated plane which NOBODY SAW ON TV HITTING ANY TOWER, JUST PASSING BEHIND THE TOWERS.

Of course, I think a missile could make a tower sway like this as well. You don't show anything either rare or normal.

There were WITNESSES that said they SAW AND HEARD A MISSILE, both at the first impact and the second one.

You has explained nothing valuable.

[achimspok]

You even could insert some butterflies.

Come on, jesudel, somebody at home?

[jesudel]

Of course, as simple as inserting butterflies.

To insert anything in the faked degenerated setting I think we all saw on tv should be so simple.

What people saw LIVE was only a draw of a plane (a shadow) moving through a little portion of a the screen, and hidding behind the towers. Nobody saw a plane hitting any tower live on TV.

I think that may be you don't understand what I say, so I repeat: NOBODY SAW A PLANE HITTING ANY TOWER LIVE ON TV.

[achimspok]

I understand very well. You are talking about ABC live seen from north west - plane in - fire and engine out.

Your conclusion is nonsense even if your Caps is locked, jesudel. Try to use your brain!

Learn a little bit about animation techniques, physics, logic. When done come back and tell me about the animation of a swaying tower.

[jesudel]

Ha, ha. Nonsense... You have shown no conclusion at all. I did.

I will write you it again in lowercase.

Nobody saw live, on any tv network, any plane hitting any tower. Only a shadow of a plane crossing a little portion of the screen and hidding behind the towers.

I think I know everything I need for beleiving that what was broadcasted live was a faked degenerated setting. I even know enough about people like you.

[achimspok]

Butterflies, jesudel, shook the tower.

And at night the sun sleeps in the deep blue sea because you saw it go down and no live camera could show the sun in the sky. That's the way it is.

You are a tiny simonshack soldier. The world is laughing and you don't even notice. You are too... whatsoever. Maybe you are nice to animals.

Please don't think about another repetition of your "believes". I will delete it because it is BORING!

[jesudel]

Ey, man, you deleted my last response.

I didn't repeat any beleive. My last message was a recomendation to you for writing poetry, telling us about the Sun, the sea and the butterflies...

It has no sense :]

Your videos are good for my disinformation section. Keep on the good work.

[achimspok]

That's nice. So either you are some kind of masochistic disinformer or you really have no (not the slightest) clue what you are talking about.

Just give me a link to your "disinformation" section. I would be astonished when there is a shred of an argument.

Meanwhile you could explain what - in your opinion - caused the towers shake. Of course, this is a little more ambitious than parroting some nonsense claims of a monocular clown. Any idea?

[jesudel]

My idea: try doing poetry and telling about the sun and butterflies.

Keep the good work. Keep on.

[achimspok]

You have no idea what caused the towers shake?

Imagine you are the tower, standing there, looking south, and something heavy hit your left eye. You would sway backwards towards north, turn your head to the left and try to sway back into your previous position.

No idea? Just try it!

[jesudel]

Imagine, imagine... Blah, blah, blah... That's the key of the TV fakery: imagination.

Man, sure, make poetry. Yes, you can ;-)

[nehorlavazapalka]

You're insane faggot.

[antimatterXXXIII]

I'll volunteer to be the plane.

[killcs]

hehe holograms dont do that lmao