Added: 3 years ago
From: crissoly
Views: 171,616
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (279)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Z

    Z

    O---------I

  • Here is a portrait of me sleeping through this movie.

  • I couldn't find the part where Basil confesses love. I thought this thread was left out of this version.

  • This version is the best i have seen yet! It follows the book so perfectly, and the actors are great :)

  • I've been obsessed since 2008 with a blonde guy who looks a lot like Peter Firth here. The guy I'm obsessed with is a cruel and vain creature, cold and selfish, yet I can never get over him.

  • The bearded guy is indeed John Gielgud.

  • @Trang 23390 - good Irish literature, not english!

  • i think it's interesting how in all of the picture of dorian gray movies, dorian's appearance is dramatically different in each version, even when the book gives a clear description of what dorian looks like. in this version, dorian looks like some sort of elven angel baby.

  • @pink333zebra You know, you're right! My guess is that because the book describes Dorian as being so incredibly beautiful and everyone has their own perspective of beautiful. Although I do recall them saying in the book that he has blonde hair so at least that was noted byt his director :)

  • Is this an adaptation of 'The Importance of Being Ernest'?

  • good English literature

  • The bearded guy reminds me of John Guilgood.

  • @MrsWLeach He is Sir John.

  • @324wilson Thanks! I'm usually good about stuff like that but there are others who fool me. Have a great weekend! 

  • Dorian Grey is a good book, but Dorian looks gay in this haha. sorry.

  • @igottosalisbury

    ...Dorian looks gay?

    LOL, how'd you like all the thinly veiled buttsex in the book then?

  • i have read the book and seen the 2009 version also and i believe this version is the most close to the book. Also, i agree that the dark hair of the latest version is a serious mistake

  • @RichardElden And The Picture of Dorian Gray was his only published novel.

  • When Dorian first appeared I had to laugh out loud XD

    His costume is just ridiculous.

    But the rest of the movie is really good, better than most adaptions where Dorian isn´t even blonde.

  • @Warladyoftheroad Haha, it's true. XD;; He...either resembles a leprechaun or Willy Wonka. I DO want that coat, however. >v>

  • @Warladyoftheroad I know! I just saw the Ben Barnes version (or most of it, because I couldn't finish it) and couldn't get over the fact that Dorian had dark hair.

  • People are tuning in expecting a sort of league of extrodinary gentleman Dorian Grey (i.e Ben Barnes). As interesting a spin as that is, it is a far cry from the original character. The original story is notorious for the strong homosexual subtext that runs through it between Wooton/Hallward and Grey who are all embodiments of a certain type of Victorian 'musical' gentlemen. In fact when Wilde himself was courting male lovers he used to send them copies of the book to divine their 'sympathies'.

  • orian gray looks gay :S ben barnes is better :P

  • dorian gray = ben barnes....

  • @RichardElden weird... here it says: oscar wilde the picture of dorian grey.... and all the audiobooks are similar to it... maybe its just a misunderstanding or there are two versions or i bought the wrong book... =S

  • @RichardElden its not a play... its just a book... not like oscar: blablabla... another guy: blablabla (sorry my english isnt great)

  •  hey, i have an exam about that story, can anyone tell me if its similar to the book of oscar wild?

  • The 1945 version is perfect.

  • mmh dorian gray seems gay XD without any offence to homosexual people (i'm too).

  • Well... at least Dorian is blonde in this incarnation, I suppose there's that.

  • I refuse to watch this video due to an early scroll through the comments.

    I just cant risk being let down.

  • Interesting. All the really negative comments on this film are on Part 1 (of 10) of the video, while in later segments the user-comments get increasingly positive- basically the folks who stuck around to watch the whole thing. I think this is a terrific adaption which preserves much of Wilde's dialogue. Seems to be adapted from the earlier shorter version

  • Porn stars are better actors than these men.

  • still better than the ghastly 2009 version

  • @vadetatimus I agree with you.

  • @vadetatimus yes, but Ben is hot !!

  • @DonnieFanDarko I try, I try! But seriously, The 2009 version is 2009x better!! ^_^

  • Somewhat different from the original novel.. but altogether a rather convincing adaptation in its own right.. Especially when the part requires that he raise his voice, young Dorian does struggle a bit with an accent he was not born to.. But well worth watching anyway. Thanks for posting.

  • no... this is so NOT RIGHT!!! It's all bloody wrong!!!

    And for another point; WHERE'S BEN BARNES??!! XD

  • @AlwaysThere4YouX

    LOL! Where is Ben Barnes indeed!!! Your comment just made my night.

  • NO NO NO TIS' SIMPLY NOT RIGHT.

    This is awful. 

  • It's only by seeing this acted on screen that I realise that Wilde's writing is so much better on the page. The sparklin wit of the dialogue in the book sounds ridiculous when spoken aloud because no one talks like that. And yet reading it, I felt that people wish they could be clever enough to think of such things in the moment.

  • It's only be seeing this acted on screen that I realise that Wilde's writing is so much better on the page. The sparklin wit of the dialogue in the book sounds ridiculous when spoken aloud. No one talks like that and yet reading it I felt that people wish they could be clever enough to think of such things in the moment.

  • i pictured the characters in my mind's eye as much younger and much handsomer.

  • 255 people did not read the book for school so watched it

  • dorian gray is a fag

  • ええのう

  • dorian is so ugly. lord henry is too old and basil doesnt look like an artist. if anything the guy that plays dorinan should be the artist 

  • @feckingbillgates. Your'e spot on. Guaranteed most of them don't know this interesting aside-the novel was originally going to be titled "Pictures from Life's Other Side" but Wilde was forced to change it 'for contractual reasons'. If the title is familar to any viewers it's because it was later used by Hank Williams' (a big Wilde fan) in his song "Picture's from Life's Other Side". True story.

  • Wonderful, thanks.

  • Loads of kids who like the 2009 film are commenting here, pretending to have authority on the original literary source!

  • I heard there is one out with a woman playing Dorian. Is this true?

  • @Alize101586 yeah it was filmed in ireland, is call "the picture of doriana graya"

  • @kachatie Welcome to Fagland!

  • It looks more meaningful than the 2009 one...

  • i like how they kept most of the dialogue the same as the one in the book, though the characters are nothing like i imagined... is the 2009 film anything like the book? because now they change everything in the books and the only thing left is the names of the character

  • @claudiamontanez

    it is quite different, but it is a good movie if you aren't constantly comparing the movie to the book. They are very different.

  • @kaitlincow Why in Heaven's name should we not compare the two? Certainly, Oscar might never have thought that this would ever be a film - pictures that move on screens, and not on stages - but as we are of this era and people can produce such things, those who have read the book still hold every right to compare. I am sure that Wilde himself would do the same.

  • la del 2009 es superficial y hollywodense nada q ver con lo magistral obra de oscar wilde

  • @1525pame Magistral?! Aburrimiento eso sí!

  • esta pelicula es un arte

  • es buena no es como0 la del 2009 quiensabe de donde sacaron su trailer

  • After seeing Sherlock Holmes, I realised that Jude Law would make an excellent Basil and Robert Downey Jr. an excellent Harry. I can't really imagine anyone but Ben Barnes playing Dorian though Alex Pettyfer would be good.

  • Personally I quite like this version, and I love Jeremy Brett's performance, particularly later on when he delivers his confession of his love to Dorian. Also, it's not fair to typecast Brett. It's Brett as an "emo painter" as psdru put it, not Holmes. Brett needed to be older than Basil so he could portray him young and older, which is obvious. If you don't like the acting, fine, but when it comes to minute details, some of you are being too critical.

  • jeremy brett should have been cast as lord henry instead of basil. lol, sherlock holmes as an emo painter

  • @psdru Yes, Gielgud was far too old.

  • @JuanMacready Johnny Gielgud was even older when I appeared with him in Jarmans War Requiem...but just as engaging...

  • I prefer the original the black and white 1945, Dorian Gray played Hurd Hatfield, He given his role an elegant menace

  • I guess Dorian Gray should be the most beautiful someone that one can ever meet...but this kid is just irritating.

  • @JuanMacready Boo. :/

  • The BBC broadcast is much more convincing, I'd recommend that to anyone who likes to listen to something with their eyes closed just before sleep. It captivated me.

  • Basil should look like Harry and Harry like Basil. :(

  • Oh he SO fits the role of Dorian Gray! I even imagined his voice to sound like that.

    First good thing here I saw.

  • Dorian is anything but charming here. He seems quite arrogant and stiff. I imagined him more childlike in all his gestures and all...

  • Dorian Gay...LOL

  • This is a great old movie... Watched it for the 90FM Stevens Point Trivia contest and it was phenomenal! A lot of people lack respect for old classics, glad to have Oz include it in some questions in the 2009 contest.

  • oh gods....I bet the story is better than the '45 version but the 3 main actors were SO GOOD!!! I mean, I love Brett, he's fantabulous, (even if that mustache kills him XD) but Harry's so old and Dorian's hair is so....curly and it's just so...70's! Also though I do appreciate his being blond....his personality is more important. believe me, I LOVE this book, and this author....but there is just no excuse for this....Hurd Hatfield is the the best screen Dorian I've seen.

  • Finally I finished the book, and finally I can watch this movie Yay !!! xD

  • Jeremy Brett was a homosexual.

  • Oh God no, surely not!

  • Yes it's true.

  • @FrankClanton Shock, horror!!! LOL

  • He had homosexual relationships, but also long and loving (not-to-mention, child producing) heterosexual relationships. You're only 15, which, I suppose, goes some way to explaining your fixation on the sexuality of other people, but there are more interesting things in life than who other people decide to go to bed with.

  • its like they r reading from the book word for word!!!!!!!!

  • oh my...he doesnt look good at all :D good movie though

  • Who doesn't?

  • oh...the accent...Oscar W is actually a dubliner...grand

  • i cannot wait to finally finish the book and watch the play! on my 2 do list for this week.

  • I finished the book about an hour ago. It is truly a wonderful piece of work-very deep observance of the human condition.

  • the book is sooo much better

  • Thanks for this upload, the new movie of dorian gray aren't like the original history, at this moment the ppl make movies only for money D:

  • @fernandokinha i agree..the movie is sooo dramatic..how horrible.

  • Peter Firth does a great Basil! Strong-voiced and vital.

  • it looks good to watch

  • This was made for TV.

  • they seem to me act in a play instead a film. and yeh they r too old...

  • I imagine basil and harry younger

  • Comment removed

  • Lord Henry was supposed to be about 30 years old at the beginning, this one is more like 50. Also Basil is not convincing at all, he looks strong, confident and mature, a far cry from the image of a sensitive artist likely to grow infatuated with a handsome young man. Those who have read the novel will be very disappointed. And Dorian, didn't your momma tell you to take off your gloves when shaking hands with someone?

  • His momma died just after he was born, so I guess not. :)

  • Yes you're right, I forgot that :o)

  • @r8wing indeed... I suppose the very irony BBC intentionally/unintentionally brought forth lies within the Henry Wotton they had crafted, who himself is a more proper reflection on the ruin that is brought to men by age... Also, 5 minutes into the film, one cannot but help to think of the acting in resemblance to the fatal performance of Sybil Vane, which is pretty much reciting the script of the novel in a mechanical manner... However, this might be the very charm of 70's screen play, who knows

  • @r8wing I read the novel and I don't really care. The movie is great and Basil/Lord Henry are amazing! Yes, its not an exact replica of the novel...*sigh* so tired of this song and dance...but the acting is quality indeed.

  • Love Jeremy Brett in Anything... but he was far more suited for the role of Dorian Gray as opposed to the role of Basil. He has the intense good looks and worldy youthfulness for it...

  • He was too old to play Dorian.

  • And Peter Firth was too... effeminate...

  • Brett was a homosexual in real life so the aging queen wouldn't have been any better.

  • @warriordiva26 If you've read the book you'll know that Dorian Grey was golden and beautiful, not dark and intense. Peter Firth was perfectly cast.

  • @CassieLopez. If you've looked at Peter Firth, you'll notice he's decidedly not beautiful.... nor does he convince me he could inspire any feelings of infatuation in either sex...

  • @warriordiva26 :-) I guess beauty truly is in the eye of the beholder.

  • @CassieLopez; when it comes to people, yes, I agree....

  • Actually Peter Firth was quite beautiful.

  • Thanx for the post.

  • Failure [2]

  • failure!!

  • well funny part is that British people cant look at naked bodies. Which I like. But Antinous was all naked and nasty, who is described as beautiful in the book.

  • the lighting here is vile. i feel like i am watching a terrible soap opera.

    and for some reason, in the 70's, no matter what other time period you're trying to portray, you will always look like you're in the 70's.

    dreadful! xD

  • This is so true. An extremely intelligent observation! You always notice that in films by the decor and costumes and the style of acting, even the accents. If you look at old films, you see the 1930s Victorian, and the 1940s Victorian. That is why the 1945 "Dorian Gray" is so wierd. It is pure 1940s American idea of Victorian. The really try to look authentic now, but I bet in 50 years time people will say......

    Look at the "Tudors" and trash like that!

  • yeah, I agree, like the B grade 50's space / sci-fi flicks LOL now they were shockers!

  • @roxyepoxy1988

    That's a very good observation. I agree.

  • That's a very good observation. I agree

  • @roxyepoxy1988 very true

  • @roxyepoxy1988 you're dreadful.

  • The 1945 version was ridiculous! The Dorian actor looked like a constipated codfish and was certainly not an "Adonis" And the English upper class didn´t have American accents in the 19th century.

    Alright, I am obsessed with accents, but the lack of accuracy is rather annoying!

  • Actually, the more upper class English have much less of English accents!

  • The most annoying thing about this is Peter Firth´s slight Yorkshire accent. It makes the idea of his being Lord Kelso´s grandson absurd!

  • I don't know why he didn't affect a different accent as he has more many other films.

  • Well, I have thought about the accent and I think that he was terribly young here and just starting out and that he hadn´t "ironed out" his real Yorkshire accent. He is also over-acting quite a lot! Everybody is in this thing! I think the whole thing is awful. Gielgud about 60 with horrible dyed hair, etc.

    Peter Firth got MUCH better later. In "Tess" he was very fine!

  • Gielgud was far too old for the part.

    I think in Aces High Peter did speak more properly, so I don't know why he didn't here unless it was a decision by the director. The lighting was bad because this was all filmed in the studio at the BBC, something that really dates series like I, Claudius.

  • Ignorance is bliss.

  • loved the book, just finished watching the 45 version.lets see how this one goes.

  • which one is the 45th?

  • the film that was made in 1945, the classic and best version yet

  • Does anyone know where I can get this? Preferably as a torrent or download, but a dvd would be great too. Thanks for any help.

  • read the book!! imagine!! there´s nothing like it

  • what happends at the end?? anyone know?

    who dies?? because i know some of the characters die but i don't know who. can someone please tell me??

  • WOUAH!! thx a lot!! :D

    and yeah... i have to read the book but i wanted to know who dies before i read it.

  • well i kinda spolied it for you the 1945 movie is better than this the b & w and in the uk there a new movie called dorian grey that was just released

  • hehe.. i like to know the end before i start and now i'm also gonna watch the movie!!

    and... 1945!?!?!! that's... whatever.

  • i agree. too bad the 45 version is not on dvd in the states. i haven't seen the colin firth one but it looks pretty kitsch compared to the classic.

  • i got it from amazon and i live in ny u can get it there

  • thanks, been a couple years since i checked, kind of gave up on it.

  • the new film is terrible watched it last night, cant believe that crap is even a film, you are not missing much

  • may i ask which one is tha classic one? i suppose this is...

  • no, the 45 version was actually a movie, not a soap operish stage production.

    yes here they have british accents, that's fine except they cannot act!

  • read the book, its good

  • yeah. i read it for school.

  • Do you really want to know..???

  • haha!! yeah!

    but someone already told me XD

  • I have no complaints about Gielgud - apart from being a decade too old he is brilliant as Lord Henry.

    But since I love Brett, and therefore would not want him not to be a part of this movie, I would prefer him as Lord Henry. The Basil role doesn't really suit him. His way of speaking is too authoritative i.e. more Henry-like. (not saying he would do a better job than Gielgud. Gielgud is brilliant)

    = a JB fan's dilemma

  • I love how the BBC version is so faithful to the book. The opening scene with Basil and Henry was spot on.

    The new version out now with Ben Barnes is very good, but in a sensational sense, it was not at all faithful to the book, which annoyed me. The action was very good however, and Ben Barnes is a great match for Dorian! :D

    Hold on... os the bloke who played Dorian in this version, Harry in Spooks? He's so sweet! :)

  • john gielgud is the only actor of these three who has any real idea how to join the dots between efffete gentlemanly conventions of the late 19th century and what we in the late 20th century know as "gay" or "camp". jeremy brett doesnt look very sure of what hes doing, and peter firth seems to think he's in a fucking little britain sketch. the "...shouldn't go in for philanthropy" lines are just painful. its also completely at odds with the book, at least from where i'm sitting (ho, ho!)

  • what's that? we're in the 21st century now, you say?  well, i say!

  • ahhh Jeremy Brett, what a legend

  • This BBC Dorian Gray is quite good. Better than the lame Dorian Gray flick with Ben Barnes coming out now. But has anyone seen "DorianGraySociety" on YouTube? It's the new indie Dorian Gray. I really love the trailer. It's quite fun and ingenious: to cast an anti-aging guru as Dorian Gray! ;) Now that's new;)

  • The picture of Dorian looks like Oscar to me. lol

    I think Tim Burton should make a version of the book, my favorite book of all time.

  • Comment removed

  • es verdad, prefiero el libro :)

  • jamás una película podrá superar el libro, me llamaba mucho la atención ver escenas, perp prefiero quedarme con las que se me crearon en la mente, la belleza de dorian es demasiada, no conozco actor que pudiese representarla, la actitud de hallaward, el sinísmo de lord henry, prefiero quedarme con lo que he creado en mi mente. Ojalá crearan una nueva pelicula que se hacerque un poco más a lo que oscar wilde quiso expresar, sería muy interesante que retomaran esta gran historia.

  • yo creo qe hayden christensen lo haria bastante bien. han hecho una version con el chico de las cronicas de narnia(el que hacia de principe caspian)

  • exacto, no creo que exista alguien que pueda representar a Dorian como se describe en el libro, Dorian posee algo que inexplicablemente echiza a todos, sin dunda me echizo a mi ;)

  • films never do justice to books, never. I agree with you.

  • Peter Firth is a fine man and actor I respect deeply.

  • Respect?

  • Indeed. Why not? Are you not an ardent fan?

  • Yeah, I just wondered what it is you respect him for. Acting?

  • His long and exellent history of acting, his lack of dramatics in moving from youth to adult parts, his diversity, his work ethic, his Emmy, his Oscar nomination and his good character personally. He is versatile and a great of the British stage and TV. You seem to distrust his other fans. I am a devoted Peter Firth admirer. Thank you

  • Oh OK, fine. I think he was only on stage twice though.

  • The earlier version with George Sanders Hurd Hatfield and Angela Lansbury was so superior to this.

  • this is bollocks!

  • i don't like jeremy brett as basil. he doesn't deliver dialogue well :(

  • Brett had a strange voice.

  • i pictured it ALL differently