I would suggest any one with the theory of Zionism in their head to type down this link and watch the video to gain some understanding of their void theory a baseless idiology that hangs onto nothing.
Relates that the Khazar(Ashkenaz)Jews were/are the sons of Japheth not Shem
Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah,Shem,Ham,and Japheth:and unto them were sons born after the flood.The sons of Japheth;the sons of Gomer;Ashkenaz
Genesis 10;1-3 Bible proves that the Ashkenaz Jews [Khazars]are not the descendants of Shem and cannot be Semite
Read Revelation 2:9,,3:9 Jesus call them,The Synagogue of satan,liars,impostors,fraud.
Read this book for free on internet WHO IS ESAU-EDOM
Revelation 2:9 I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.
The birth of the State of Israel in 1948 is a fulfillment of a Bible prophecy. Isaiah 66:8 "Who hath heard such a thing? who hath seen such things? Shall the earth be made to bring forth in one day? or shall a nation be born at once? for as soon as Zion travailed, she brought forth her children."
REV: 13:3 "And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast." All throughout the Bible the word Beast is always speaking of a Nation NOT an individual person. Which nation seemed dead, gone forever & "came to life again" & now the world wonders after this beast nation . . ISRAEL . . Many today, calling themselves Christian, bow to this modern Golden Calf.
screw israel since ages and god gave them the power and they misused it, and therefor god sent other people to own the jews and blow them away. (read history) and now i believe that 1.5bil muslim who are filled with fury against israel because they killed lots palestine people, and theyr ready to not just blow israel, theyr ready to delete israel from the history the present and the future.
You can't make a history of how Israel came to be and leave out the Irgun, Lechi etc. it would be like doing a history of how Ireland came to be and leaving out the original IRA.
REV: 13:3 "And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast." All throughout the Bible the word Beast is always speaking of a Nation NOT an individual person. Which nation seemed dead, gone forever & "came to life again" & now the world wonders after this beast nation . . ISRAEL
What I don't understand is why so many atheists call themselves Jews. I don't care if your mother and her mother and her mother ad infinitum, were all Jews, if you don't believe in Yahweh, the Torah and the Talmud, you aren't a Jew. If you don't accept the supernatural, you aren't a jew and I, personally will NEVER recognize you as one. I will call you that atheist you are and welcome you into MY club, rationalism.
France is the nation state of the French, Germany of the Germans, Israel of the Jewish people. Despite of this, minority rights, of course, have to be granted.
If an Arab Israeli - being part of a national minority group within the State of Israel, doesn't want to sing the national anthem of Israel, he/she can do so (like minority citizens of France and Germany too). BUT: rights should go parallel with loyalty!
@Euriel1 Israel is NOT the nation state of the Jewish people. Would you say that the United States and Canada is the nation state of Native American Indians? I doubt it.
In 2011, 25% of Israel's total population are Arab citizens. Add to that fact, Arab families reproduce at a much faster rate than Israeli Jews, therefore we can assume an Arab Majority before the end of the century.
Loyalty belongs to G-d, not some country who's loyalty is based on race.
@woodchucko Of course! what you think that because they are Jews they are automatically killed or something? In fact, there are plenty of Jews who live in Iran and along with Ahmadinejad, question the reality of the Holocaust.
@PeaceFroggs The Jews will keep the majoraty in Israel! Because the produce rate of the israeli arabs is going down to 3.5 children per mother in counting.... the Jewish produce rate is getting higher each year and now its 2.9 children per mother! AND THAT'S A FACT!!!
@StangeWorld0000 Thank you, but I think you misunderstood, one of the reason I made the video is to show people that Palestine wasn't a inhabitable desert. In fact, there were indeed 100's of thousands of Palestinians living there. David Ben Gurion even stated in his book that Jews made up only 12% of the population in 1914. A pretty low percentile of Jews, considering that thousands had immigrated there by that date. thanks for your feedback.
At 5:12 , for example, the video states there was apopulation of 757,182 in Palestine
(120,466 Sq.Km), i.e. on the whole(!) territory of the British Mandate, not the territory of the future Jewish state.
I think that a more relevant and fair numbers should refer to the population (fewer) and the percent of Jews (larger) at the area of the future Jewish state.
@StangeWorld0000 I agree with you, it was the entire territory of Palestine. However, Palestinians have been either killed, deported or became Israeli citizens in Partitioned Israel/Palestine. Therefore Palestinians lived in those same area's. My other point is, if the Zionists have a right of return after 2000 years, why can't the Palestinians return after less than 200 years? And if the Zionist were allowed to create an independent state in 1948, why can't the Palestinians do the same?
@StangeWorld0000 I believe the Zionists that run Israel are just giving lip service, I really don't believe they are sincere about accepting a Palestinian state anytime soon. Furthermore, refugees will NOT have a right of return within Israel's borders, for the simple fact that Israel's continued existence as a "Jewish State" relies solely on Jewish demographic majority. Israel is not a democracy. Finally, the only threat to the "Jewish State" is the steady decline of Jewish immigration.
Gaza and most of the West Bank were passed to Palestinian control since 1993. It's obvious to anyone that these territories are a basis for future state. Giving up territories is irreversible process and is much more than giving lip service...
As I wrote- a right for return is a destruction of Jewish state, thus unacceptable.
@StangeWorld0000 Territories captured during the 1967 war are still considered "occupied territories" by the U.N, U.K. even the U.S, including human rights organizations. The principles of a democracy are that all citizens are equal before the law and have equal access to power. The fact that a right of return for Palestinians would result in the destruction of the Jewish state is proof that Israel isn't democracy. Today, Israel can only be considered a Jewish apartheid theocratic state.
@StangeWorld0000 1- you said "Of course residents of the "occupied territories" are not citizens of Israel." So then ask yourself, why are Israeli's demolishing Palestinian homes and building Israeli homes on the "occupied territories" ? 2- example of "proof", In a democracy, there is division between church and state. In Israel, unless you are Jewish, you have no right of return. Why? because Israel is a "Jewish state" Question, if the 20% Arabs grows to 51%, is it still a Jewish state?
1)Building of settlements is a complicated and endless issue, I can't say I'm 100% in favor of it. Although I beleive you're mixing two things together: a)settlements expansion b)pal. homes demolition for security reasons.
The way you present it, it may imply that it is one at the expense of the other. Which is not so.
2)democracy doesn't have to be separated from "church". If you have source that states otherwise- post. Finland, Norway,UK don't have full separation.
@StangeWorld0000 If there is no Palestinian state within the next 2-3 decades, Israel will either be Jewish but not democratic, or Israel will be democratic but not Jewish. Why? Because the Arab population living under Israeli control will surpass the number of Israeli Jews. Therefore we can conclude that the Zionists ultimately want a two state solution. Part of the occupied lands will become part of a Palestinian nation, but today's settlement areas are a land grab, plain and simple.
@StangeWorld0000 You indirectly agreed with me that Israel is a Jewish apartheid theocratic state. Israel's immigration policy is based solely on religion/race. No democracy reserves exclusive rights for a particular religion or nationality.
It's an exaggeration by far! Sounds like a wish, not a reality...
1)Theocratic- religious parties are a minority, laws are not issues according to religious rules, just some customs are statutory. And of course the immigrations rules
2)Apartheid- As I said: all citizens are equal. period!
3) Israel IS a Democracy that reserves exclusive rights for a particular religion or nationality.
Very good work. Historically, you got all your facts straight, got all the personalities right. One thing, you use the word "Aliyah" in one place, without explaining that it means a wave of immigration. In other places you say wave of immigration. Also, you use the term IDF, without explaining to the ignorant (cough, Americans, cough cough) that this means the Israeli Army. Just two points that might help you get your message across better. BIG kudos for objectivity! Five thumbs up!
I would suggest any one with the theory of Zionism in their head to type down this link and watch the video to gain some understanding of their void theory a baseless idiology that hangs onto nothing.
posts.fanbox dot com/dsl84
AskFereidoon 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Bible
Relates that the Khazar(Ashkenaz)Jews were/are the sons of Japheth not Shem
Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah,Shem,Ham,and Japheth:and unto them were sons born after the flood.The sons of Japheth;the sons of Gomer;Ashkenaz
Genesis 10;1-3 Bible proves that the Ashkenaz Jews [Khazars]are not the descendants of Shem and cannot be Semite
Read Revelation 2:9,,3:9 Jesus call them,The Synagogue of satan,liars,impostors,fraud.
Read this book for free on internet WHO IS ESAU-EDOM
goldberg823 1 month ago
So it is true.... Israel and the Israeli people are a fabricated people.
rhdez11 1 month ago
NOT ISRAEL....Mount Seir Ezekiel 35
jamjr1972 2 months ago
@PeaceFroggs: So do you think it's a bad thing that Israel was formed?
TheLogicalKey 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Revelation 2:9 I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.
jatamode 3 months ago
JER 3:8 divorce of Israel IS 50:1 bill of divorcement HO 2:2 Israel not my wife
gram914 4 months ago
Blessings and cursings Lev. 26:1-39 Deut. 28:1-68 Privileges and penalties God made a unilateral arrangement with Moses at Sinai
Physical peoples of Israel were expected to obey,keep, remember, do, and walk in the covenant arrangements.
They forgot, they transgressed (profaned, rejected broke (Jere. 31:32), and sinned against those arrangements.
They experienced the promised consequences of "curses," war, sickness, exile, death and the termination of the covenant arrangement.
gram914 4 months ago
Israel sucks
PurpBeatz 4 months ago
@PurpBeatz tru
ilovechicago21 4 months ago
The birth of the State of Israel in 1948 is a fulfillment of a Bible prophecy. Isaiah 66:8 "Who hath heard such a thing? who hath seen such things? Shall the earth be made to bring forth in one day? or shall a nation be born at once? for as soon as Zion travailed, she brought forth her children."
knightsofstjoan2004 4 months ago
REV: 13:3 "And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast." All throughout the Bible the word Beast is always speaking of a Nation NOT an individual person. Which nation seemed dead, gone forever & "came to life again" & now the world wonders after this beast nation . . ISRAEL . . Many today, calling themselves Christian, bow to this modern Golden Calf.
gram914 4 months ago
@gram914 Amen to that.
TheEverLearning 4 months ago in playlist TheEverLearning's favorites
screw israel since ages and god gave them the power and they misused it, and therefor god sent other people to own the jews and blow them away. (read history) and now i believe that 1.5bil muslim who are filled with fury against israel because they killed lots palestine people, and theyr ready to not just blow israel, theyr ready to delete israel from the history the present and the future.
canadianmb9 5 months ago
You can't make a history of how Israel came to be and leave out the Irgun, Lechi etc. it would be like doing a history of how Ireland came to be and leaving out the original IRA.
uncleadolf 6 months ago
REV: 13:3 "And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast." All throughout the Bible the word Beast is always speaking of a Nation NOT an individual person. Which nation seemed dead, gone forever & "came to life again" & now the world wonders after this beast nation . . ISRAEL
gram914 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What I don't understand is why so many atheists call themselves Jews. I don't care if your mother and her mother and her mother ad infinitum, were all Jews, if you don't believe in Yahweh, the Torah and the Talmud, you aren't a Jew. If you don't accept the supernatural, you aren't a jew and I, personally will NEVER recognize you as one. I will call you that atheist you are and welcome you into MY club, rationalism.
christo930 9 months ago
I'd love a banana split..
jamesrp007 9 months ago
Can anyone please tell me the music piece used in this?
onetherton 10 months ago
@onetherton Hungarian Rhapsody No. 2
PeaceFroggs 9 months ago
@onetherton hungarian rhapsody?
specter290 6 months ago
France is the nation state of the French, Germany of the Germans, Israel of the Jewish people. Despite of this, minority rights, of course, have to be granted.
If an Arab Israeli - being part of a national minority group within the State of Israel, doesn't want to sing the national anthem of Israel, he/she can do so (like minority citizens of France and Germany too). BUT: rights should go parallel with loyalty!
Euriel1 10 months ago
@Euriel1 Israel is NOT the nation state of the Jewish people. Would you say that the United States and Canada is the nation state of Native American Indians? I doubt it.
In 2011, 25% of Israel's total population are Arab citizens. Add to that fact, Arab families reproduce at a much faster rate than Israeli Jews, therefore we can assume an Arab Majority before the end of the century.
Loyalty belongs to G-d, not some country who's loyalty is based on race.
PeaceFroggs 10 months ago
@PeaceFroggs good point.
woodchucko 1 month ago
@PeaceFroggs Arabs are free to practice their religion in Israel. Is the same true for Jews in arab nations?
woodchucko 1 month ago
@woodchucko Of course! what you think that because they are Jews they are automatically killed or something? In fact, there are plenty of Jews who live in Iran and along with Ahmadinejad, question the reality of the Holocaust.
rhdez11 1 month ago
@PeaceFroggs The Jews will keep the majoraty in Israel! Because the produce rate of the israeli arabs is going down to 3.5 children per mother in counting.... the Jewish produce rate is getting higher each year and now its 2.9 children per mother! AND THAT'S A FACT!!!
BmmYou94 1 week ago
let them have there god damned desert ill keep my lushes green hills and plains.
damiansmith1488 10 months ago
It's not a democracy, if it serves exclusive rights for a 'particular' religion or nationality.
irka13 11 months ago
Good work.
The percentage of nationalities are given for the whole British mandate territory.
(Correct me if I'm wrong).
More relevant are numbers refering to the percentage at the territory of 1948 Israel.
StangeWorld0000 1 year ago
@StangeWorld0000 Thank you, but I think you misunderstood, one of the reason I made the video is to show people that Palestine wasn't a inhabitable desert. In fact, there were indeed 100's of thousands of Palestinians living there. David Ben Gurion even stated in his book that Jews made up only 12% of the population in 1914. A pretty low percentile of Jews, considering that thousands had immigrated there by that date. thanks for your feedback.
PeaceFroggs 1 year ago
@PeaceFroggs
At 5:12 , for example, the video states there was apopulation of 757,182 in Palestine
(120,466 Sq.Km), i.e. on the whole(!) territory of the British Mandate, not the territory of the future Jewish state.
I think that a more relevant and fair numbers should refer to the population (fewer) and the percent of Jews (larger) at the area of the future Jewish state.
StangeWorld0000 1 year ago
@StangeWorld0000 I agree with you, it was the entire territory of Palestine. However, Palestinians have been either killed, deported or became Israeli citizens in Partitioned Israel/Palestine. Therefore Palestinians lived in those same area's. My other point is, if the Zionists have a right of return after 2000 years, why can't the Palestinians return after less than 200 years? And if the Zionist were allowed to create an independent state in 1948, why can't the Palestinians do the same?
PeaceFroggs 1 year ago
@PeaceFroggs
Well, the Palestinian state is almost a reality, Israel has aceepted the idea of it.
I'm sure the refugees will have a right to return There(!).
Advocating their right to return to the territory of today's Israel is a righteous looking cover for a strive to destroy the Jewish state.
StangeWorld0000 1 year ago
@StangeWorld0000 I believe the Zionists that run Israel are just giving lip service, I really don't believe they are sincere about accepting a Palestinian state anytime soon. Furthermore, refugees will NOT have a right of return within Israel's borders, for the simple fact that Israel's continued existence as a "Jewish State" relies solely on Jewish demographic majority. Israel is not a democracy. Finally, the only threat to the "Jewish State" is the steady decline of Jewish immigration.
PeaceFroggs 1 year ago
@PeaceFroggs
Gaza and most of the West Bank were passed to Palestinian control since 1993. It's obvious to anyone that these territories are a basis for future state. Giving up territories is irreversible process and is much more than giving lip service...
As I wrote- a right for return is a destruction of Jewish state, thus unacceptable.
Why you think Israel isn't democracy?
StangeWorld0000 1 year ago
@StangeWorld0000 Territories captured during the 1967 war are still considered "occupied territories" by the U.N, U.K. even the U.S, including human rights organizations. The principles of a democracy are that all citizens are equal before the law and have equal access to power. The fact that a right of return for Palestinians would result in the destruction of the Jewish state is proof that Israel isn't democracy. Today, Israel can only be considered a Jewish apartheid theocratic state.
PeaceFroggs 1 year ago
@PeaceFroggs
Each citizen of Israel has the rights you stated, and more...
Of course residents of the "occupied territories" are not citizens of israel.
Can't figure out your point about a "proof"... how is that proving anything?
Each democratic state has a right for immigration policy of its own, whatever the reasons will be.
I have an impression that you use the term "theocratic" as an inverse for "democratic", I hope u aware it's not so.
StangeWorld0000 1 year ago
@StangeWorld0000 1- you said "Of course residents of the "occupied territories" are not citizens of Israel." So then ask yourself, why are Israeli's demolishing Palestinian homes and building Israeli homes on the "occupied territories" ? 2- example of "proof", In a democracy, there is division between church and state. In Israel, unless you are Jewish, you have no right of return. Why? because Israel is a "Jewish state" Question, if the 20% Arabs grows to 51%, is it still a Jewish state?
PeaceFroggs 1 year ago
@PeaceFroggs
1)Building of settlements is a complicated and endless issue, I can't say I'm 100% in favor of it. Although I beleive you're mixing two things together: a)settlements expansion b)pal. homes demolition for security reasons.
The way you present it, it may imply that it is one at the expense of the other. Which is not so.
2)democracy doesn't have to be separated from "church". If you have source that states otherwise- post. Finland, Norway,UK don't have full separation.
StangeWorld0000 1 year ago
@StangeWorld0000 If there is no Palestinian state within the next 2-3 decades, Israel will either be Jewish but not democratic, or Israel will be democratic but not Jewish. Why? Because the Arab population living under Israeli control will surpass the number of Israeli Jews. Therefore we can conclude that the Zionists ultimately want a two state solution. Part of the occupied lands will become part of a Palestinian nation, but today's settlement areas are a land grab, plain and simple.
PeaceFroggs 1 year ago
@PeaceFroggs
I agree with your analisys.
Although I would chose some softer words instead of "land grab". :)
StangeWorld0000 1 year ago
@PeaceFroggs
Again, certain immigration policy doesn't make a country non democratic.
Israel is Jewish state as long as it laws allow it to be the homeland for the Jewish people.
I doubt that a 51% Arab majority would allow Israel to ramain a Jewish state.
StangeWorld0000 1 year ago
@StangeWorld0000 You indirectly agreed with me that Israel is a Jewish apartheid theocratic state. Israel's immigration policy is based solely on religion/race. No democracy reserves exclusive rights for a particular religion or nationality.
PeaceFroggs 1 year ago
@PeaceFroggs
It's an exaggeration by far! Sounds like a wish, not a reality...
1)Theocratic- religious parties are a minority, laws are not issues according to religious rules, just some customs are statutory. And of course the immigrations rules
2)Apartheid- As I said: all citizens are equal. period!
3) Israel IS a Democracy that reserves exclusive rights for a particular religion or nationality.
StangeWorld0000 1 year ago
Very good work. Historically, you got all your facts straight, got all the personalities right. One thing, you use the word "Aliyah" in one place, without explaining that it means a wave of immigration. In other places you say wave of immigration. Also, you use the term IDF, without explaining to the ignorant (cough, Americans, cough cough) that this means the Israeli Army. Just two points that might help you get your message across better. BIG kudos for objectivity! Five thumbs up!
R3dp055um 1 year ago
Nicely done ; )
DuffMan790 1 year ago
Good video.
91177info 1 year ago