Oh it's fantastic! I saw her do this at the Met in the 80's in a very lavish production, and it's still one of the very best things I ever saw on that stage. To sing at such a high level and perform such mechanical moves at the same is a real feat. Brava!
I'm going to blame that on the sound quality. She sounds like she's very good. Although the outfit kinda scares me but I love twisted versions of this song.
this really impressed me. she is completely mechanical...and check out her feet and hands!! they are so funny. she obviously really studied dolls. this is a performance I love because I respect her so much for her acting.
It has ALWAYS been the custom to add things, to make it unique for each singer. Especially the second time around.
Ruth was one of the great true Bel canto singers. She and Kraus together were wonderful. She knew her voice type and stuck with it. No getting her to take on too heavy a role.
And, yes she did study those mechanical dolls. If you notice there is not a phrase without some small movement, just as would be the case if she were a wind up singing doll!
As for her voice, no heaviness there at all. She has a lovely, bright coloratura voice and that squeak was obviously intentional considering Olympia is a mechanical doll. This piece is perfect for her voice.
Wow! Incredible performance. Not only does she sing it well, but she's obviously done her homework on the behaviour of the old mechanical dolls. Not only can this woman sing, she can act. I've never seen this aria done this well before. Even the other actors onstage clapped for her when she was finished.
Well, actually, the note is an Eb, not a D. But the person who called it a squeak is not far wrong. It did not resonate in her voice. But she makes up for it with her extra, slow triplet, that awesome huge Eb-F-Eb one, that begins the series of triplets, right near the end.
Actually hers was the begining of the kinds of dolls we see today. Back in the day her doll would stop the show. Literally ovations lastings up to a half hour.
Ruth passed away a few years ago I believe. This was not her best role. I love hearing her sing "come per me sereno"....lovely and better suited to her voice.
what is that finale note?
DaughterxOfxBlaze 2 years ago
increible, que gran voz, una de las mejores versiones que he escuchado
musicrose33 3 years ago
One of the best I've seen so far. She's soo cute! :)♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥
Opreaismylife10692 3 years ago 2
Oh it's fantastic! I saw her do this at the Met in the 80's in a very lavish production, and it's still one of the very best things I ever saw on that stage. To sing at such a high level and perform such mechanical moves at the same is a real feat. Brava!
globalmuse 3 years ago
It is so sad that we lost her to cancer :(
Merryjest 3 years ago
nice acting,
not to sure about the singing! :|
stueylovesalex 3 years ago
I'm going to blame that on the sound quality. She sounds like she's very good. Although the outfit kinda scares me but I love twisted versions of this song.
KitanaiBaishunfu 2 years ago
I think they went waaaaay overboard with the the automaton stuff. Hoffman has to still believe that she's a real person.
archcorenth 3 years ago
this really impressed me. she is completely mechanical...and check out her feet and hands!! they are so funny. she obviously really studied dolls. this is a performance I love because I respect her so much for her acting.
europeobsession 3 years ago
It has ALWAYS been the custom to add things, to make it unique for each singer. Especially the second time around.
Ruth was one of the great true Bel canto singers. She and Kraus together were wonderful. She knew her voice type and stuck with it. No getting her to take on too heavy a role.
And, yes she did study those mechanical dolls. If you notice there is not a phrase without some small movement, just as would be the case if she were a wind up singing doll!
earlwgreen 4 years ago 2
THERE IS NO NEED IMPROVISE HOFFMAN. what is she doing???????????????
a10064 4 years ago
fantastica!
arredifestivi 4 years ago
she sings like a broken doll almost all the time
mezzolui 4 years ago
She is a real doll. BRAVA 5/5
63Attila 4 years ago 2
As for her voice, no heaviness there at all. She has a lovely, bright coloratura voice and that squeak was obviously intentional considering Olympia is a mechanical doll. This piece is perfect for her voice.
Madamx28 4 years ago 2
Wow! Incredible performance. Not only does she sing it well, but she's obviously done her homework on the behaviour of the old mechanical dolls. Not only can this woman sing, she can act. I've never seen this aria done this well before. Even the other actors onstage clapped for her when she was finished.
Madamx28 4 years ago
her voice is heavy and with some kind of witch like sound to sing this aria
But im sure that she's good with the queen of the night role
Heartlessiceboy 4 years ago
Dessay's version is too drawn out and ponderous. Welting's is clean and bright. And much more entertaining to watch.
sujinshin6291 4 years ago
amen.
bruceagogox 4 years ago
I hate when people do repertoire that is not right for their voice...
x4812k 4 years ago
Why do you say that is not right for her voice???
actionsrlouder 4 years ago
In my score it's a do diaz!
singspieler 4 years ago
But you're absolutely right, this aria is a semitone higher than my score, so it's an Eb (which does not make the aria any easier... :))
avdk8 4 years ago
In my score it's a D...
avdk8 4 years ago
because the is too version of the aria the normal one high and another version 1 tone lower!!
sonqualnave 4 years ago
Nathalsa, that squeak was quite supposed to happen... It's a high d and is written.
avdk8 4 years ago
Well, actually, the note is an Eb, not a D. But the person who called it a squeak is not far wrong. It did not resonate in her voice. But she makes up for it with her extra, slow triplet, that awesome huge Eb-F-Eb one, that begins the series of triplets, right near the end.
RossiniSoprano 4 years ago
bravissima
0055SOPRANO 4 years ago
don't you have the sutherland's version of this aria?
aleduffoo 4 years ago
i prefer her lucia di lammermoor
mdancer01 4 years ago
Is it just me, or was that little slip/squeak thing not supposed to happen at 2:38?
nathalsa 4 years ago
Note perfette!!!
WWWjuandiegoflorezIT 4 years ago
Actually hers was the begining of the kinds of dolls we see today. Back in the day her doll would stop the show. Literally ovations lastings up to a half hour.
divaboy86 4 years ago
hey!! it was ok.but i loved more the doll song from luciana serra.i was watching it one week ago but now i cant find it .maybe someone knows???
normatosca 4 years ago
Thanks for sharing. I had the great privilege of hearing her sing an astonishing Zerbinetta at San Francisco Opera back in the 70's.
NoogaJim 4 years ago
Ruth passed away a few years ago I believe. This was not her best role. I love hearing her sing "come per me sereno"....lovely and better suited to her voice.
Hako2004 4 years ago
Definetly not the best olympia, but shes OK.
sour7lemon 4 years ago