It saddens me to see so many people apparently didn't watch the video at all given you guys think they're going to use this for games or home use. Whats more is they clearly outlined what the chip would be used for and what they planned to do with it in the future yet Faosfx and alaskanhybrid both still failed to realize IT'S NOT FOR GAMES DIPSHITS
Hey everybody todays home computer games does not use much more than 4 cores, hmmm i really wonder why most of todays processors don't have much more than 4 cores per CPU strange huh. Seriously this is overkill for now. Also remember Doom 4 that was shown with a 8 core Mac G5 tower, and that was shown using one Core according to John Carmack, lead designer of Id Software,so we dont need something this overkill, at least for now. I understand that this is what is potential
The cores they are refering to is nothing like what you see on desktop. These 48 cores are probably very simple, without alot of execution units, no branch prediction or SIMD. I am guessing they are not even capable of out of order execution. This chip to me functions alot more like a GPU with many smaller cores which are optimized for tasks which are extremely parallel.
There will be 128/512cores in our PC's in max 10 years time, and People wan't remember about MHz or GHz because these processors will be Clocked at 1,5-2,0 or 4,0 GHz and only newer will be added. Or there will be a technology of adding new cores without changing the motherboard and sockets just adding 12-30-100 cores like HDD to your PC :P
@Hxcmole Gotta love how the Internet lets you hide behind a keyboard to blurt out things you'd never say if we knew your name and where you lived. Coward.
Even the top-of-the-line current Intel Core 2 extreme chips are overkill for most applications.
Core i7 975 3.3ghz Extreme edition also destroys every possible app and game with proper ram and graphics cards. It will be years, maybe even a decade, before such a chip will be outdated.
These new superchips will be useful, but only for professionals, labs, institutes, etc.. For massive calculations etc.. The normal home user already has the future in his grasp. Top i7's are already overkill.
Computer games dont need intel multicore stuff.Quad,Dual core - play no any role in most applications.Intel is just imitating it's importance.Most calcualtions and I/O process are made by GPU and DRAM's.
@maciejwrotek that doesn't mean processor cores are important.Video cards process much more theads and perform much more calculations.Games use multicore technology because x 86 intel architecture + Microsoft created monopoly which imposes it's goods.Videocards + memory are becoming much more important parts and may be will become independent from CPU in the future.
I can prove that processors have no future - superscalar architecture highlighted new way - independent decentralized processing that means that processor can be split into several parts and will "dissipate" among other motherboard elements.
@pokeshark #1 that is a fake quote by Bill Gates and he never said it, #2: even normal 2ghz dual cores with windows xp are enough for 90% of the world's people, offices, schools etc. today, and that technology is soon 10 years old.
yes. after moore's law failed, and multicores became the norm, i think alot of architects forgot about the purpose of encapsulation. the days of optimizing code for specific platforms needs to end.
i just like to know one thng is this 48 core can do teraflops cal per sec?? looking for info but cant find it and will this be in hr? desktop pc ? plz anyone who know info share about it...
from now on I suggest uploading 1920x1080 (surely you shoot in HD) and call it a day. How ironic to be watching 800Kbps flv about 48 core development from the biggest chip maker in the world.
Don't wait for this to be released on the PC market, it sounds like a processor that would cost well around $5,580.00 given the industry its going to be used in. PCs will stay around the Octacore arena........48+ cores is overkill for a single user, he will never take full advantage of all cores. Todays graphics engines are so lousy that even with 48 cores I bet they'll still lag even the most equipped systems.
@faosfx C'mon man of course we'll eventually be using 48+ cores on our desktop and laptop systems. Mass production will eventually drop the price of such technology and one day in YOUR lifetime you'll see it happen. But don't take my word for it, Bill gates once said: "16 Megs of Ram is all you'll ever need".
@faosfx Forget about your faggy games! It's not designed for games! Modern games use only 3 cores, not even eight! It's designed for the FUCKING servers! GOT IT?!
Not sure what every one is getting excited about, i have a 8 core 4 virtual intel i7 and there is no software to take advantage of 4 cores much less 8?? software and windows itself is way to far bwhind, i havent even seen a core 2 duo at both cores maxed out. i can get 3 cores at 30 percent and thats it.
If you want to get a core 2 duo to his max just try "Supreme commander". I have an E8400. It shows me 99 to 100% activity if i set this game to 8 players with maximum units after a certain playtime, as every unit movement is calculated by the cpu. It would be interesting what it does to a core i7.
I think the Indian guy is the most engaging, he uses his hands and changes the pitch of his voice. It really makes a difference, the other guys just make me want to sleep.
@drealm One Poss. interpretation might be assigning a, some data set(s) to a series of prog's. or, if you like, inversely, output-assigning a, some data set(s) to prog's. with the poss. assigning commands, metacommands in the OSI layers, determining which individual or series of optimal environs (Pick a cloud, any cloud!) in which to continue or complete a, some calculations' series.
Thanks Jaxon, 12 Core? wow, they really onto something, making this world a lot more hotter, don't you think? hehehe... gonna need super ultra cool fan and a chilled room for it.
yaosio, you just read my mind... almost 2010 and they still mess up aspect ratios for videos. And the audio is plain awful.
Concerning the SCC, it actually seems a huge achievement. The industry needs better scalability and power management, we can't just keep pushing more transistors and be happy about it.
Let's hope the masterminds make good use of this new tech! And let's hope they hire someone that bothers to upload videos properly next time...
They've said 125W at peak, and 25W for all cores if it's not terribly active. Sounds like it'd be more efficient than some Core i7 and Xeon chips, at least!
This is an awesome development. Some of the first developments of the 'computer on a chip' or transputer as it was called then were done by inmos in the 80s. A whole cloud on a chip is really exciting stuff.
What? Cloud computing on a single chip - what is wrong with this picture.
DieGrootsteBaas 8 months ago
very informative
sunaibabu 1 year ago
wow!! good work Jimmy Neutron ..
another invention was made by you !!
it'll failed after you use it i already saw this on tv ..
fox000014 1 year ago
It saddens me to see so many people apparently didn't watch the video at all given you guys think they're going to use this for games or home use. Whats more is they clearly outlined what the chip would be used for and what they planned to do with it in the future yet Faosfx and alaskanhybrid both still failed to realize IT'S NOT FOR GAMES DIPSHITS
ididntwantomakeaname 1 year ago
Hey everybody todays home computer games does not use much more than 4 cores, hmmm i really wonder why most of todays processors don't have much more than 4 cores per CPU strange huh. Seriously this is overkill for now. Also remember Doom 4 that was shown with a 8 core Mac G5 tower, and that was shown using one Core according to John Carmack, lead designer of Id Software,so we dont need something this overkill, at least for now. I understand that this is what is potential
alaskanhybrid 1 year ago
they afford overkill prossesors, but not an good camera?
merkeren32 1 year ago
The cores they are refering to is nothing like what you see on desktop. These 48 cores are probably very simple, without alot of execution units, no branch prediction or SIMD. I am guessing they are not even capable of out of order execution. This chip to me functions alot more like a GPU with many smaller cores which are optimized for tasks which are extremely parallel.
ApplePotato 1 year ago
There will be 128/512cores in our PC's in max 10 years time, and People wan't remember about MHz or GHz because these processors will be Clocked at 1,5-2,0 or 4,0 GHz and only newer will be added. Or there will be a technology of adding new cores without changing the motherboard and sockets just adding 12-30-100 cores like HDD to your PC :P
MrXandercage17 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what would be a computer with a mutlicore processor to edit high definition videoos.
petenicezz 1 year ago
Yes, we can finally build Skynet!
sxejere 1 year ago
@sxejere Crynet !!!!
FSXHD92 1 year ago
intel sux my balls =]
Hxcmole 1 year ago
@Hxcmole Gotta love how the Internet lets you hide behind a keyboard to blurt out things you'd never say if we knew your name and where you lived. Coward.
michaelcerros 1 year ago
@michaelcerros come to me plz. I have many keyboards and alot of internet. Plus i can step out my door and look you in the eyes.
Hxcmole 1 year ago
Even most interrupts can be handled by other devices without any processor!
It will be a kind of supersuperscalar architecture that will kill CPU.
Globalizator1 2 years ago
shit!
killer95sd 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hey das vid hat definitiv und an die männer geht mal auf FrauenMeister . com wen ihr checker sein wollt
keropanalos 2 years ago
Even the top-of-the-line current Intel Core 2 extreme chips are overkill for most applications.
Core i7 975 3.3ghz Extreme edition also destroys every possible app and game with proper ram and graphics cards. It will be years, maybe even a decade, before such a chip will be outdated.
These new superchips will be useful, but only for professionals, labs, institutes, etc.. For massive calculations etc.. The normal home user already has the future in his grasp. Top i7's are already overkill.
darkzerk7 2 years ago
Computer games dont need intel multicore stuff.Quad,Dual core - play no any role in most applications.Intel is just imitating it's importance.Most calcualtions and I/O process are made by GPU and DRAM's.
Globalizator1 2 years ago
@Globalizator1 no ? but if i play call of duty it eats 80% of my two cores, so games use multicore technology
maciejwrotek 1 year ago
@maciejwrotek that doesn't mean processor cores are important.Video cards process much more theads and perform much more calculations.Games use multicore technology because x 86 intel architecture + Microsoft created monopoly which imposes it's goods.Videocards + memory are becoming much more important parts and may be will become independent from CPU in the future.
Globalizator1 1 year ago
I can prove that processors have no future - superscalar architecture highlighted new way - independent decentralized processing that means that processor can be split into several parts and will "dissipate" among other motherboard elements.
Globalizator1 2 years ago
@darkzerk7 640K ought to be enough for anybody.
pokeshark 1 year ago
@pokeshark #1 that is a fake quote by Bill Gates and he never said it, #2: even normal 2ghz dual cores with windows xp are enough for 90% of the world's people, offices, schools etc. today, and that technology is soon 10 years old.
yamato99935 1 year ago
Puharrelel Puhrogramming Puhroductivity and Puhower management 'as two areas that need to be imPuhroved
silentredi 2 years ago
yes. after moore's law failed, and multicores became the norm, i think alot of architects forgot about the purpose of encapsulation. the days of optimizing code for specific platforms needs to end.
part2themovie 2 years ago
Behold the Sony PS5
placebomessiah 2 years ago
wow he really has a big forehead
Jeeeeeeeeezeeeeeeeez 2 years ago
cause his brain is the size of a bowling ball
freeze1305 2 years ago 11
AMD SUCKS
bvestationfan 2 years ago
hey bin so einsam jemand evtl lust zu camen oder schreibn
libbiswwety 2 years ago
GIANT FOREHEAD
RenegadeFury 2 years ago
i just like to know one thng is this 48 core can do teraflops cal per sec?? looking for info but cant find it and will this be in hr? desktop pc ? plz anyone who know info share about it...
tomyloveu 2 years ago
sorry your question is to advanced for me i cant help
but why don't you try to contact intel send them email and ask
i realy hope you get the answer of your Qs
fhnaaaa 2 years ago
estan enfermos!
Gonza2425 2 years ago
Comment removed
faosfx 2 years ago
loool
BAC9I 2 years ago
1:01 my gosh look at the size of his forehead is just huge man !! lol.
Maybe he has a lot lot of intel chips inside his head.
couga8888 2 years ago
lol
MrGomsGom 2 years ago
lmao
faosfx 2 years ago
from now on I suggest uploading 1920x1080 (surely you shoot in HD) and call it a day. How ironic to be watching 800Kbps flv about 48 core development from the biggest chip maker in the world.
jslackin 2 years ago
oh my god man, your right. a multi-million dollar company shooting video in 720x480 format, lol thats sad.
faosfx 2 years ago
@faosfx Multi-Million? Billion more like
Boulty91 2 years ago
Not even, Intel should be shooting Ultra High Definition Video 7680x4320 LOL look up on wiki, it does exist!
faosfx 2 years ago
@faosfx YEAH CAUSE WIKI NEVER LIES
Boulty91 2 years ago
Yeahhh! Game on or no?
StefConEnterprises 2 years ago
But can it play Crysis at very high settings?
So surprised no one's really said this :P
TWeaK819 2 years ago
Not excited yet. They really should have mentioned it's gaming potential.
subsynchronous 2 years ago
Comment removed
eseiw 2 years ago
i'm joking of course. ;)
subsynchronous 2 years ago
Who me? Naaa, I'd never do that. (hides mallet behind back) What simplexity isn't a watchword these days? Balderdash, I say!
sourceweft 2 years ago
want one thanks :D
stonerscolony 2 years ago
а на русский не судьба было перевести??????????
777russian 2 years ago
Don't wait for this to be released on the PC market, it sounds like a processor that would cost well around $5,580.00 given the industry its going to be used in. PCs will stay around the Octacore arena........48+ cores is overkill for a single user, he will never take full advantage of all cores. Todays graphics engines are so lousy that even with 48 cores I bet they'll still lag even the most equipped systems.
faosfx 2 years ago 6
"640K of memory should be enough for anybody"
kifkroker1 2 years ago
i want more
cronatos 2 years ago
@faosfx C'mon man of course we'll eventually be using 48+ cores on our desktop and laptop systems. Mass production will eventually drop the price of such technology and one day in YOUR lifetime you'll see it happen. But don't take my word for it, Bill gates once said: "16 Megs of Ram is all you'll ever need".
kurtnelle 1 year ago
@faosfx That's just so wrong. But of course you pussied out and closed your account. Fuckface.
hardstyle905 11 months ago
@faosfx Forget about your faggy games! It's not designed for games! Modern games use only 3 cores, not even eight! It's designed for the FUCKING servers! GOT IT?!
GordonFreeMANness 10 months ago
thanks superingo I'll give it a shot
triggawolf0000 2 years ago
i build my own chip
kristianVenlo 2 years ago
Parallelism needed .
cassano2012 2 years ago
ниче так
ThePrimiere 2 years ago
Nice --
GroovyVideo2 2 years ago
Not sure what every one is getting excited about, i have a 8 core 4 virtual intel i7 and there is no software to take advantage of 4 cores much less 8?? software and windows itself is way to far bwhind, i havent even seen a core 2 duo at both cores maxed out. i can get 3 cores at 30 percent and thats it.
triggawolf0000 2 years ago
If you want to get a core 2 duo to his max just try "Supreme commander". I have an E8400. It shows me 99 to 100% activity if i set this game to 8 players with maximum units after a certain playtime, as every unit movement is calculated by the cpu. It would be interesting what it does to a core i7.
SuperIngo184 2 years ago
Comment removed
sourceweft 2 years ago
I think the Indian guy is the most engaging, he uses his hands and changes the pitch of his voice. It really makes a difference, the other guys just make me want to sleep.
ebikeofacookbook 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fuck all you're boring arse research give me the dam hardware ill pisss on some games with it for the real pc users :D
wezzy1983 2 years ago
I only care if it helps make better internet porn, Oh......I will be telling John Connor about this new chip.
tonkaaaaa 2 years ago
0:33
The guy on the right in the green is my dad :D.
Yeah, I've seen him working on the 48, looks amazing. :D. Considering most have dual or quad now. Godly
redsepher 2 years ago
2:46 High brain detected
Usulgurt 2 years ago
Can someone put this geek talk into something your average fat beer drinking American can understand?
All I gotta know is if the fucker is fast.
drealm 2 years ago
@drealm One Poss. interpretation might be assigning a, some data set(s) to a series of prog's. or, if you like, inversely, output-assigning a, some data set(s) to prog's. with the poss. assigning commands, metacommands in the OSI layers, determining which individual or series of optimal environs (Pick a cloud, any cloud!) in which to continue or complete a, some calculations' series.
sourceweft 2 years ago
@sourceweft
Ur fucken wit my head you nerd!
drealm 2 years ago
whatta, 48 Core in a single processor? I thought mine Apple MacPro Quad Core was already the hottest in the market... damn!
ZaNazNur 2 years ago
No, that would be the 8-core Mac Pro ;)
Then there's that 12-core (24 virtual core) model that's waiting just around the corner *ahem*
ActionJaxon666 2 years ago
Thanks Jaxon, 12 Core? wow, they really onto something, making this world a lot more hotter, don't you think? hehehe... gonna need super ultra cool fan and a chilled room for it.
ZaNazNur 2 years ago
awesome :-)
eseiw 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
1:08 what an egg-head.. :P
gaborperak23 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wtf why are indians in video, intel going cheap!!!!!!!!!
caidy100 2 years ago
If I'm not mistaken India is the #1 in making micro chips and IT stuff or #2...something like that.
gla300 2 years ago
By the way, the chip should be called SCC (Single-chip Cluster Computer).
I bet that was actually the name for months until someone in marketing made sure the lastest-catchphrase was included instead of the proper word...
alkeno 2 years ago
yaosio, you just read my mind... almost 2010 and they still mess up aspect ratios for videos. And the audio is plain awful.
Concerning the SCC, it actually seems a huge achievement. The industry needs better scalability and power management, we can't just keep pushing more transistors and be happy about it.
Let's hope the masterminds make good use of this new tech! And let's hope they hire someone that bothers to upload videos properly next time...
alkeno 2 years ago
That german man's head looks awkfully huge in this video.
Anyhow ... very interesting. And I thought my doublecore was up to date
yesilovetheinternet 2 years ago
And they can't figure out the aspect ratio of a video.
yaosio 2 years ago
Finally Intel is Pushing the Boundary of there Die Technology :D
8462995 2 years ago
I've been doing this since 1981 and the technology gets more and more amazing every year.
marrngtn 2 years ago
48 cores on a single chip... i want this now!
jorge10928 2 years ago
wow really awesome....
atlaschooty 2 years ago
holy moly look at that guy's forehead!
mike1305 2 years ago
AMDfag status: Told.
NuLLx42 2 years ago
Is this Larrabee?
lazyassbum 2 years ago
No it isn't.
aarlin81 2 years ago
I Guess you're right, Larrabee's dead.
...Or on hiatus at least.
lazyassbum 2 years ago
No, it's not
he2he 2 years ago
I thought that The U.S didnt allow intel to sell other countries Super computers.
People Are forgeting about the Upcoming Laser processors
master9716 2 years ago
Partners in academia?
Folding@Home!
aarlin81 2 years ago
Academic partners...
They should share it with AMD,Nvidia etc...
Om3gaZer0 2 years ago
lolz
Nightmare365wj 2 years ago
Meh. Intel has shared enough with them.
TheOink 2 years ago
i wish me i could work there but my Education is too bad lol.
HongKongKanto 2 years ago
wtf... intel's employees are like 80% indian..
kingdong4 2 years ago 2
Love to know the power requirements for one of them, prob less than expected with the advanced power management. Cant wait to see people using them
ShadowsLight15 2 years ago
They've said 125W at peak, and 25W for all cores if it's not terribly active. Sounds like it'd be more efficient than some Core i7 and Xeon chips, at least!
postalshack 2 years ago
what software can utalize all those cores?
meekoman25 2 years ago
Crysis
TheRealBoyardee 2 years ago
ha ha
meekoman25 2 years ago
cool, haha u guys picked a led psu, look at the size of the motherboard
TylertheGeek28 2 years ago
This is an awesome development. Some of the first developments of the 'computer on a chip' or transputer as it was called then were done by inmos in the 80s. A whole cloud on a chip is really exciting stuff.
shizoor 2 years ago 2
See, The more they work the more they find out and the faster and better Are CPU's will become.
Very Cool!
Xigmatek 2 years ago 2
Yes, I reposted it because the aspect ratio got messed up on the original post.
channelintel 2 years ago
is this a repost?
FFEEZZProductions 2 years ago
idk
FXSEBAS 2 years ago