Added: 2 years ago
From: channelintel
Views: 95,152
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (118)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • What? Cloud computing on a single chip - what is wrong with this picture.

  • very informative

  • wow!! good work Jimmy Neutron ..

    another invention was made by you !!

    it'll failed after you use it i already saw this on tv ..

  • It saddens me to see so many people apparently didn't watch the video at all given you guys think they're going to use this for games or home use. Whats more is they clearly outlined what the chip would be used for and what they planned to do with it in the future yet Faosfx and alaskanhybrid both still failed to realize IT'S NOT FOR GAMES DIPSHITS

  • Hey everybody todays home computer games does not use much more than 4 cores, hmmm i really wonder why most of todays processors don't have much more than 4 cores per CPU strange huh. Seriously this is overkill for now. Also remember Doom 4 that was shown with a 8 core Mac G5 tower, and that was shown using one Core according to John Carmack, lead designer of Id Software,so we dont need something this overkill, at least for now. I understand that this is what is potential

  • they afford overkill prossesors, but not an good camera?

  • The cores they are refering to is nothing like what you see on desktop. These 48 cores are probably very simple, without alot of execution units, no branch prediction or SIMD. I am guessing they are not even capable of out of order execution. This chip to me functions alot more like a GPU with many smaller cores which are optimized for tasks which are extremely parallel.

  • There will be 128/512cores in our PC's in max 10 years time, and People wan't remember about MHz or GHz because these processors will be Clocked at 1,5-2,0 or 4,0 GHz and only newer will be added. Or there will be a technology of adding new cores without changing the motherboard and sockets just adding 12-30-100 cores like HDD to your PC :P

  • Yes, we can finally build Skynet!

  • @sxejere Crynet !!!!

  • intel sux my balls =]

  • @Hxcmole Gotta love how the Internet lets you hide behind a keyboard to blurt out things you'd never say if we knew your name and where you lived. Coward.

  • @michaelcerros come to me plz. I have many keyboards and alot of internet. Plus i can step out my door and look you in the eyes.

  • Even most interrupts can be handled by other devices without any processor!

    It will be a kind of supersuperscalar architecture that will kill CPU.

  • shit!

  • Even the top-of-the-line current Intel Core 2 extreme chips are overkill for most applications.

    Core i7 975 3.3ghz Extreme edition also destroys every possible app and game with proper ram and graphics cards. It will be years, maybe even a decade, before such a chip will be outdated.

    These new superchips will be useful, but only for professionals, labs, institutes, etc.. For massive calculations etc.. The normal home user already has the future in his grasp. Top i7's are already overkill.

  • Computer games dont need intel multicore stuff.Quad,Dual core - play no any role in most applications.Intel is just imitating it's importance.Most calcualtions and I/O process are made by GPU and DRAM's.

  • @Globalizator1 no ? but if i play call of duty it eats 80% of my two cores, so games use multicore technology

  • @maciejwrotek that doesn't mean processor cores are important.Video cards process much more theads and perform much more calculations.Games use multicore technology because x 86 intel architecture + Microsoft created monopoly which imposes it's goods.Videocards + memory are becoming much more important parts and may be will become independent from CPU in the future.

  • I can prove that processors have no future - superscalar architecture highlighted new way - independent decentralized processing that means that processor can be split into several parts and will "dissipate" among other motherboard elements.

  • @darkzerk7 640K ought to be enough for anybody.

  • @pokeshark #1 that is a fake quote by Bill Gates and he never said it, #2: even normal 2ghz dual cores with windows xp are enough for 90% of the world's people, offices, schools etc. today, and that technology is soon 10 years old.

  • Puharrelel Puhrogramming Puhroductivity and Puhower management 'as two areas that need to be imPuhroved

  • yes. after moore's law failed, and multicores became the norm, i think alot of architects forgot about the purpose of encapsulation. the days of optimizing code for specific platforms needs to end.

  • Behold the Sony PS5

  • wow he really has a big forehead

  • cause his brain is the size of a bowling ball

  • AMD SUCKS

  • hey bin so einsam jemand evtl lust zu camen oder schreibn

  • GIANT FOREHEAD

  • i just like to know one thng is this 48 core can do teraflops cal per sec?? looking for info but cant find it and will this be in hr? desktop pc ? plz anyone who know info share about it...

  • sorry your question is to advanced for me i cant help

    but why don't you try to contact intel send them email and ask

    i realy hope you get the answer of your Qs

  • estan enfermos!

  • Comment removed

  • loool

  • 1:01 my gosh look at the size of his forehead is just huge man !! lol.

    Maybe he has a lot lot of intel chips inside his head.

  • lol

  • lmao

  • from now on I suggest uploading 1920x1080 (surely you shoot in HD) and call it a day. How ironic to be watching 800Kbps flv about 48 core development from the biggest chip maker in the world.

  • oh my god man, your right. a multi-million dollar company shooting video in 720x480 format, lol thats sad.

  • @faosfx Multi-Million? Billion more like

  • Not even, Intel should be shooting Ultra High Definition Video 7680x4320 LOL look up on wiki, it does exist!

  • @faosfx YEAH CAUSE WIKI NEVER LIES

  • Yeahhh! Game on or no?

  • But can it play Crysis at very high settings?

    So surprised no one's really said this :P

  • Not excited yet. They really should have mentioned it's gaming potential.

  • Comment removed

  • i'm joking of course. ;)

  • Who me? Naaa, I'd never do that. (hides mallet behind back) What simplexity isn't a watchword these days? Balderdash, I say!

  • want one thanks :D

  • а на русский не судьба было перевести??????????

  • Don't wait for this to be released on the PC market, it sounds like a processor that would cost well around $5,580.00 given the industry its going to be used in. PCs will stay around the Octacore arena........48+ cores is overkill for a single user, he will never take full advantage of all cores. Todays graphics engines are so lousy that even with 48 cores I bet they'll still lag even the most equipped systems.

  • "640K of memory should be enough for anybody"

  • i want more

  • @faosfx C'mon man of course we'll eventually be using 48+ cores on our desktop and laptop systems. Mass production will eventually drop the price of such technology and one day in YOUR lifetime you'll see it happen. But don't take my word for it, Bill gates once said: "16 Megs of Ram is all you'll ever need".

  • @faosfx That's just so wrong. But of course you pussied out and closed your account. Fuckface.

  • @faosfx Forget about your faggy games! It's not designed for games! Modern games use only 3 cores, not even eight! It's designed for the FUCKING servers! GOT IT?!

  • thanks superingo I'll give it a shot

  • i build my own chip

  • Parallelism needed .

  • ниче так

  • Nice --

  • Not sure what every one is getting excited about, i have a 8 core 4 virtual intel i7 and there is no software to take advantage of 4 cores much less 8?? software and windows itself is way to far bwhind, i havent even seen a core 2 duo at both cores maxed out. i can get 3 cores at 30 percent and thats it.

  • If you want to get a core 2 duo to his max just try "Supreme commander". I have an E8400. It shows me 99 to 100% activity if i set this game to 8 players with maximum units after a certain playtime, as every unit movement is calculated by the cpu. It would be interesting what it does to a core i7.

  • Comment removed

  • I think the Indian guy is the most engaging, he uses his hands and changes the pitch of his voice. It really makes a difference, the other guys just make me want to sleep.

  • I only care if it helps make better internet porn, Oh......I will be telling John Connor about this new chip.

  • 0:33

    The guy on the right in the green is my dad :D.

    Yeah, I've seen him working on the 48, looks amazing. :D. Considering most have dual or quad now. Godly

  • 2:46 High brain detected

  • Can someone put this geek talk into something your average fat beer drinking American can understand?

    All I gotta know is if the fucker is fast.

  • @drealm One Poss. interpretation might be assigning a, some data set(s) to a series of prog's. or, if you like, inversely, output-assigning a, some data set(s) to prog's. with the poss. assigning commands, metacommands in the OSI layers, determining which individual or series of optimal environs (Pick a cloud, any cloud!) in which to continue or complete a, some calculations' series.

  • @sourceweft

    Ur fucken wit my head you nerd!

  • whatta, 48 Core in a single processor? I thought mine Apple MacPro Quad Core was already the hottest in the market... damn!

  • No, that would be the 8-core Mac Pro ;)

    Then there's that 12-core (24 virtual core) model that's waiting just around the corner *ahem*

  • Thanks Jaxon, 12 Core? wow, they really onto something, making this world a lot more hotter, don't you think? hehehe... gonna need super ultra cool fan and a chilled room for it.

  • awesome :-)

  • If I'm not mistaken India is the #1 in making micro chips and IT stuff or #2...something like that.

  • By the way, the chip should be called SCC (Single-chip Cluster Computer).

    I bet that was actually the name for months until someone in marketing made sure the lastest-catchphrase was included instead of the proper word...

  • yaosio, you just read my mind... almost 2010 and they still mess up aspect ratios for videos. And the audio is plain awful.

    Concerning the SCC, it actually seems a huge achievement. The industry needs better scalability and power management, we can't just keep pushing more transistors and be happy about it.

    Let's hope the masterminds make good use of this new tech! And let's hope they hire someone that bothers to upload videos properly next time...

  • That german man's head looks awkfully huge in this video.

    Anyhow ... very interesting. And I thought my doublecore was up to date

  • And they can't figure out the aspect ratio of a video.

  • Finally Intel is Pushing the Boundary of there Die Technology :D

  • I've been doing this since 1981 and the technology gets more and more amazing every year.

  • 48 cores on a single chip... i want this now!

  • wow really awesome....

  • holy moly look at that guy's forehead!

  • AMDfag status: Told.

  • Is this Larrabee?

  • No it isn't.

  • I Guess you're right, Larrabee's dead.

    ...Or on hiatus at least.

  • No, it's not

  • I thought that The U.S didnt allow intel to sell other countries Super computers.

    People Are forgeting about the Upcoming Laser processors

  • Partners in academia?

    Folding@Home!

  • Academic partners...

    They should share it with AMD,Nvidia etc...

  • lolz

  • Meh. Intel has shared enough with them.

  • i wish me i could work there but my Education is too bad lol.

  • wtf... intel's employees are like 80% indian..

  • Love to know the power requirements for one of them, prob less than expected with the advanced power management. Cant wait to see people using them

  • They've said 125W at peak, and 25W for all cores if it's not terribly active. Sounds like it'd be more efficient than some Core i7 and Xeon chips, at least!

  • what software can utalize all those cores?

  • Crysis

  • ha ha

  • cool, haha u guys picked a led psu, look at the size of the motherboard

  • This is an awesome development. Some of the first developments of the 'computer on a chip' or transputer as it was called then were done by inmos in the 80s. A whole cloud on a chip is really exciting stuff.

  • See, The more they work the more they find out and the faster and better Are CPU's will become.

    Very Cool!

  • Yes, I reposted it because the aspect ratio got messed up on the original post.

  • is this a repost?

  • idk

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more