Jarrah simply (and desperately) desires to be famous, and positioning himself as a cross between Bill Kaysing and James Bond is only laughable because it's so pathetic. If he wasn't so enamored by the sound of his own non-stop voice, there might be room inside that head of his for more than one perspective on this issue.
@kaleljordankent so this your evidence is it just some personnel stuff directed towards JW if you and your Apollogist friends are trying prove that Manned Moon Landings actually happened? if you are trying to suggest that , you would just answer the questions , gos without saying doesn't it!
@ccc771 I don't mean to nit pick, but I think you mean personal not personnel. The other obvious grammatical errors in your statement make it difficult to decipher your point. So until you can form coherent sentences I will direct you towards 0:38 to 1:05 of the video and the video description box so that you may better understand the video. If you need any help with the big words, just ask.
@kaleljordankent well i guess getting personnel mixed up with personal its a bit like these pro NASA fans out there going on about a few very trivial mathematical mistakes JW has made! someone actually wasted precious life doing a Video about it... lol. I guess i trust the spell check a bit to much without checking precisely what word it is.. ghastly of me i guess... im not first and i don't think I'll be last.
@ccc771 Don't take it too personally. It's just easier for me to give you a concise reply if your thoughts are presented clearly. Word meanings are important when stating your case. Using the appropriate words correctly lend credibility to comments.
JDub has made minor math errors and he has made some monumental ones. His videos have become uninspired, rehashed whining heavy with errors. The struggle has taken its toll on JW. Maybe it's time for him to find a new conspiracy to cash in on.
I'm sorry... a very few trivial mathematical errors that JW has made. Trival?????? The guy showed that if he had a rock on the moon with 36 times the cross sectional area of an Earth rock, then he could hold up 216 times more mass on the moon. He then concluded that he could scatter rocks with 216 times more force on the moon. That's not trivial... that's a whopping huge howler...
The guy cannot even get basic physics correct. he does know the difference between Newton's first law and Newton's second law. How is he supposed to digest complex information. It not about trivial. He simply does not have the capacity to offer any formal critique at any scientific level. That's not trivial, that's a failure. No one can defend that, surely???
ProppaGannis -- such a delightful word. And actually, one I think rather appropriate. Before the Soviets fiddled with it, a propagandist was simply one who disseminated (propagated) information, essentially a teacher. Yep, Latin done me good.
@philwebb59 Whenever our "phonically challenged friend" says his favorite word it always reminds me of one of the monsters that would battle Godzilla. Thus the dinosaur in the logo. I always liked propagandist better than apologist. As if there's something to apologize for. Yeah right.
@lukequixotesanjose I hadn't planned on doing this one either. I figure on just sitting back and watching Brant pick him apart. But he did invite all of us to his pity party so I didn't want him to think I was ignoring him. Then I saw the Picard clip and thought it was perfect. All the monkey stuff was for another project, but it seemed to fit too.
Jarrah simply (and desperately) desires to be famous, and positioning himself as a cross between Bill Kaysing and James Bond is only laughable because it's so pathetic. If he wasn't so enamored by the sound of his own non-stop voice, there might be room inside that head of his for more than one perspective on this issue.
hibob418 4 months ago
i don't see any attempt here to answer any of JW's 32 questions tells us a lot about the Apollogists
ccc771 1 year ago
@ccc771 Oh it's and answer alright. Just not one JW or his attack puppets want to hear.
kaleljordankent 1 year ago
@kaleljordankent so this your evidence is it just some personnel stuff directed towards JW if you and your Apollogist friends are trying prove that Manned Moon Landings actually happened? if you are trying to suggest that , you would just answer the questions , gos without saying doesn't it!
ccc771 1 year ago
@ccc771 I don't mean to nit pick, but I think you mean personal not personnel. The other obvious grammatical errors in your statement make it difficult to decipher your point. So until you can form coherent sentences I will direct you towards 0:38 to 1:05 of the video and the video description box so that you may better understand the video. If you need any help with the big words, just ask.
kaleljordankent 1 year ago
@kaleljordankent well i guess getting personnel mixed up with personal its a bit like these pro NASA fans out there going on about a few very trivial mathematical mistakes JW has made! someone actually wasted precious life doing a Video about it... lol. I guess i trust the spell check a bit to much without checking precisely what word it is.. ghastly of me i guess... im not first and i don't think I'll be last.
ccc771 1 year ago
@ccc771 Don't take it too personally. It's just easier for me to give you a concise reply if your thoughts are presented clearly. Word meanings are important when stating your case. Using the appropriate words correctly lend credibility to comments.
JDub has made minor math errors and he has made some monumental ones. His videos have become uninspired, rehashed whining heavy with errors. The struggle has taken its toll on JW. Maybe it's time for him to find a new conspiracy to cash in on.
kaleljordankent 1 year ago
@ccc771
I'm sorry... a very few trivial mathematical errors that JW has made. Trival?????? The guy showed that if he had a rock on the moon with 36 times the cross sectional area of an Earth rock, then he could hold up 216 times more mass on the moon. He then concluded that he could scatter rocks with 216 times more force on the moon. That's not trivial... that's a whopping huge howler...
lukequixotesanjose 1 year ago
@ccc771
The guy cannot even get basic physics correct. he does know the difference between Newton's first law and Newton's second law. How is he supposed to digest complex information. It not about trivial. He simply does not have the capacity to offer any formal critique at any scientific level. That's not trivial, that's a failure. No one can defend that, surely???
lukequixotesanjose 1 year ago
Great video KJ. And some very nice answers, too.
Rob260259 1 year ago
ProppaGannis -- such a delightful word. And actually, one I think rather appropriate. Before the Soviets fiddled with it, a propagandist was simply one who disseminated (propagated) information, essentially a teacher. Yep, Latin done me good.
philwebb59 1 year ago
@philwebb59 Whenever our "phonically challenged friend" says his favorite word it always reminds me of one of the monsters that would battle Godzilla. Thus the dinosaur in the logo. I always liked propagandist better than apologist. As if there's something to apologize for. Yeah right.
kaleljordankent 1 year ago
That's one way of answering his 32 dumb questions... I'm waiting to make my repsonse video... but I'll take my time and cherish the moment.
lukequixotesanjose 1 year ago
@lukequixotesanjose I hadn't planned on doing this one either. I figure on just sitting back and watching Brant pick him apart. But he did invite all of us to his pity party so I didn't want him to think I was ignoring him. Then I saw the Picard clip and thought it was perfect. All the monkey stuff was for another project, but it seemed to fit too.
kaleljordankent 1 year ago
Comment removed
lukequixotesanjose 1 year ago
Good way to address that prick from Down Under. He hasn't woken up yet from his dream of self-importance.
BlisterHiker 1 year ago
@BlisterHiker Thanks BH. I think in light of his presentation my response was appropriate.
kaleljordankent 1 year ago