"debunking" would require you to address the other points brought up in the video. It took six minutes to find out that ALL your amazing "proof" is that the guy said "I think" regarding the victim who died after 40 days! Was that the entire basis of Shack's film? Uh No. What about that Asian lady who was taking phonecalls in reception? Didn't the doorman say the building was evacuated? You critcize him for doing a film review, whilst you have given us nothing but a crippled u-tube review.
Someone tell this idiot to go to the networks archives and look up the live footage that was aired that day. I don't Simon was working those days at all of those networks and manipulated footage of the Verazzano bridge directly behind the towers when they are 8 miles away and off to the far left of the towers!
Simon Shack Debunked? Here is your one hard fact! The media was involved in 911. Here are the knockout blows idiots and no these aren't by Simon Shack:
"Simon Says" is a game for three or more players (most often children). One of the people is "Simon." The others must do what Simon tells them to do when asked with a phrase beginning with "Simon says". If Simon says "Simon says jump", the players must jump (players that do not jump are out)... In general, it is the spirit of the command, not the actions that matters... It is the ability to distinguish between valid and invalid commands, rather than ability, that matters here.
The "Shack" is the nickname used by reporters for the police beat in New York City. In most cities, such a bureau is nicknamed a "cop shop." It is named after a cramped office located inside the NYPD headquarters, where journalists report on crime stories.
[Shack is a Zionist-controlled media whore implanted in the NPT movement to bring it down via a pre-planned "shitty research" false-flag operation.]
911conspiracyTV~ Timing is everything. And this is topical, the material is fresh.
I'm convinced that Simon does NOT believe the crap he spits out. He gave himself away in "P911"; and I'll be able to use it. Kind of like 'hoisted by his own petard', so to speak.
Honestly I don't think being so "meticulous" is helping much the research here. 911 is not a bad video at all. You want hard proof, well the "switch of copyright" is already proof that the "911 hotel" movie was a propaganda deceptive opera. How about the other claims of taking pictures from impossible location?
You seem on the way of just debunking every Simon's video, as soon as it comes out. I feel a very bad smell here..
If Simon Shack bothered to edit the mistakes he's made all over his videos then maybe we wouldn't need to look to hard at his latest videos for errors.
"If Simon Shack bothered to edit the mistakes he's made all over his videos then maybe we wouldn't need to look to hard at his latest videos for errors."
Just to clarify, I am not on the Simon's side, either. I am still blocked and cant comment on his videos/channel, because I expressed doubts about his claim of the tower collapse and everything else being fake. Simon is pushing some agenda or is just too willingly blind to see that his "100%" tv fakery does not hold a bit.
Ancientkiki~ Thank you for the question! I have spent 2 yrs doing basic research, locating many of the camera positions used on 9/11 in and around NYC. Ive also re-constructed what would be the foot print of Flight175, if there was one. I now have the time to keep abreast of current research; peer review, and all that.
Do you think that lies and disinformation should go un-exposed?
With one easy click you may also find out how to spell "courtesy". But of course, since the BBC itself seems to be crowded with inept transcribers - I'm sure you slipped up purposely (and repeatedly) only out of professional sympathy !
He calls himself a 'meticulous researcher,' how far from the truth that is. I can not post at simonshack's videos because he blocks anyone who disagrees with him. I hope he amends that with 'hopeless researcher' which would be more reasonable, closer to the truth.
"debunking" would require you to address the other points brought up in the video. It took six minutes to find out that ALL your amazing "proof" is that the guy said "I think" regarding the victim who died after 40 days! Was that the entire basis of Shack's film? Uh No. What about that Asian lady who was taking phonecalls in reception? Didn't the doorman say the building was evacuated? You critcize him for doing a film review, whilst you have given us nothing but a crippled u-tube review.
theDarkFlowDotNet 2 years ago
@theDarkFlowDotNet~ Thank you for your thoughtful comment.
I addressed Simon*s only substantive point.
What about the lady taking phone calls? If you think there was substance, please explain; it looked like innuendo, to me.
Thanks again.
YougeneDebs 2 years ago
Blue line red line yellow line, just paint them in there somewhere a nd you are at home debs.
esharpf 2 years ago
Would you care to elaborate?
YougeneDebs 2 years ago
Someone tell this idiot to go to the networks archives and look up the live footage that was aired that day. I don't Simon was working those days at all of those networks and manipulated footage of the Verazzano bridge directly behind the towers when they are 8 miles away and off to the far left of the towers!
seymourbutts3 2 years ago
Simon Shack Debunked? Here is your one hard fact! The media was involved in 911. Here are the knockout blows idiots and no these aren't by Simon Shack:
watch?v=PshUQPvCUF8
watch?v=nH8HY4vANIE
seymourbutts3 2 years ago
Are you having trouble telling the difference between 'innuendo' and 'fact'?
YougeneDebs 2 years ago
Not at all!
seymourbutts3 2 years ago
The FACT the media was involved is not cancelled out by Simon Shack's disinformation.
webfairy2 2 years ago
Yes, you are absolutely correct. I stayed straight on Simons disinfo and didnt touch the larger issue Fakery (a concept I support).
The trick is to establish the type and extent of the MSM involvement using FACTS.
So far, so elusive.
My research continues.
And, Good Luck with yours!
YougeneDebs 2 years ago
Comment removed
OzzybanOswald 2 years ago
Everyone is invited to read the article I just posted in the video description of "PROPAGANDA911" :
"He thought he was the lucky one, but then tragedy struck"
It is from The Independent (Ireland), September 11, 2002.
simonshack 2 years ago
"Everyone is invited"
Oh yeah!
Then you can block em...
Why u block everyone who disagrees with you?
My YT Address Book, Blocked Users (0)
ss-man, what is the number of ur Blocked Users? Is it (300) ??? Or even more?
KimmoKuopio 2 years ago
Every one: When you see Simon (or anyone) mocking the pain and sorrow of others, how does that make you feel?
Has Simon lost touch with his humanity?
Or, is he getting paid to mock the suffering of others? Paid to spread innuendo, lies, and disinformation?
YougeneDebs 2 years ago
From Wikipedia:
"Simon Says" is a game for three or more players (most often children). One of the people is "Simon." The others must do what Simon tells them to do when asked with a phrase beginning with "Simon says". If Simon says "Simon says jump", the players must jump (players that do not jump are out)... In general, it is the spirit of the command, not the actions that matters... It is the ability to distinguish between valid and invalid commands, rather than ability, that matters here.
EvilUSAandthe911Lie 2 years ago
EvilUSAandthe911Lie~
I had to remove one of your posts for foul language.
I appreciate your interest in my work, but please keep your comments clean.
Thank you.
YougeneDebs 2 years ago
NP, Debs. Just forgot your policy.
EvilUSAandthe911Lie 2 years ago
From Wikipedia:
The "Shack" is the nickname used by reporters for the police beat in New York City. In most cities, such a bureau is nicknamed a "cop shop." It is named after a cramped office located inside the NYPD headquarters, where journalists report on crime stories.
[Shack is a Zionist-controlled media whore implanted in the NPT movement to bring it down via a pre-planned "shitty research" false-flag operation.]
EvilUSAandthe911Lie 2 years ago
We all make mistakes, fakery is relevant.
photofu 2 years ago
photofu~ yes, we all make mistakes; and I support the concept of Fakery.
But I can't support just making things up; nor disinformation!
And I can't sit back and let someone spread lies and disinformation.
YougeneDebs 2 years ago
Exactly! And if someone makes an honest mistake, they should admit to it. Not admitting to it is highly suspect.
EvilUSAandthe911Lie 2 years ago
good one debs - well done for letting others know they are being lied to by people like shack.
brokenstyx 2 years ago
brokenstyx~ Thanks!
And the lies are easy to catch! One click (sometimes)!
YougeneDebs 2 years ago
Good quick work. That's all it takes.
Does Psymon really think the victims are fake, too? Or has he just found the perfect icing on his fakery cake of September Clues? He is evil.
...and you're welcome!
-Matt
911conspiracyTV 2 years ago
911conspiracyTV~ Timing is everything. And this is topical, the material is fresh.
I'm convinced that Simon does NOT believe the crap he spits out. He gave himself away in "P911"; and I'll be able to use it. Kind of like 'hoisted by his own petard', so to speak.
Something to look forward to!
YougeneDebs 2 years ago
Thanks again YougeneDebs for highlighting another SS mistake, may you continue making them.
youroom101 2 years ago
youroom101~ Thanks!
Keep making them? I've heard that Simon's next video will be pushing prarllax again. same old, same old.
YougeneDebs 2 years ago
Honestly I don't think being so "meticulous" is helping much the research here. 911 is not a bad video at all. You want hard proof, well the "switch of copyright" is already proof that the "911 hotel" movie was a propaganda deceptive opera. How about the other claims of taking pictures from impossible location?
You seem on the way of just debunking every Simon's video, as soon as it comes out. I feel a very bad smell here..
fresniak 2 years ago 2
If Simon Shack bothered to edit the mistakes he's made all over his videos then maybe we wouldn't need to look to hard at his latest videos for errors.
youroom101 2 years ago
"If Simon Shack bothered to edit the mistakes he's made all over his videos then maybe we wouldn't need to look to hard at his latest videos for errors."
That's right and correct, agree with you here.
fresniak 2 years ago
Just to clarify, I am not on the Simon's side, either. I am still blocked and cant comment on his videos/channel, because I expressed doubts about his claim of the tower collapse and everything else being fake. Simon is pushing some agenda or is just too willingly blind to see that his "100%" tv fakery does not hold a bit.
fresniak 2 years ago
Sorry to jump to conclusions like Simon does lol. Its really poor that he feels the neeed to blocks people who disagree with him.
youroom101 2 years ago
yougene are you interested in finding evidence instead of debunking so much?
ancientkiki 2 years ago 3
No he's not ..his method is to divide and conquer..
The911REGIMENT 2 years ago
The911REGIMENT~ Im simply following the evidence.
YougeneDebs 2 years ago
Ancientkiki~ Thank you for the question! I have spent 2 yrs doing basic research, locating many of the camera positions used on 9/11 in and around NYC. Ive also re-constructed what would be the foot print of Flight175, if there was one. I now have the time to keep abreast of current research; peer review, and all that.
Do you think that lies and disinformation should go un-exposed?
YougeneDebs 2 years ago
Yougene, my fellow meticulous researcher :
With one easy click you may also find out how to spell "courtesy". But of course, since the BBC itself seems to be crowded with inept transcribers - I'm sure you slipped up purposely (and repeatedly) only out of professional sympathy !
simonshack 2 years ago
Simon! It's always a pleasure! Yes, you caught me miss-spelling! Bravo for you!
Speaking of that, the only spelling I have found is "Sweeting" for the family from UK.
OH! And I noticed that Ronnie Clifford was in the Hotel when WTC2 was attacked, and not in the WTC2 as you claim. Thanks for your response!
YougeneDebs 2 years ago
He calls himself a 'meticulous researcher,' how far from the truth that is. I can not post at simonshack's videos because he blocks anyone who disagrees with him. I hope he amends that with 'hopeless researcher' which would be more reasonable, closer to the truth.
youroom101 2 years ago
youroom101~
SS, the 'hopeless researcher'!! LOL
YougeneDebs 2 years ago