@RUDY2295 LOL I Build my own systems and no i didnt buy a 1000 dollar cpu or even a 300 dollar one with a 400/300 dollar gpu i worked for my system and used old part for it with a decent gpu im still using socket LGA775 and thats about to go obsolete i just wanted to tell you there are ways to get higher scores with mid-range components
There wont be a big difference between those 2. when playing at higher resolution u need higher bandwidth so than the 8800GTS would be a better choice.
LOL yeah, If I really push my system (which I should mention is less than a year old), I could probably get ~5 FPS. Thats how crappy my integrated graphics are. (GeForce 6150SE) lol.
dude, its just a sphonsor...think about this: its not a game, so not many people r gona buy it. and its not for consoles so even less sales. plus its a high performance benchmark which means it requires good specs computers to run properly, which means even less sales...whos gona pay for the hard work they put into creating such beautiful real time graphics system? sponsors!
You only spend 2000+ if you're dumb enough to buy a pre-made from retailers. Buy your own components and put them together, and you can have a decent rig for under 1500. Sure it's not the latest, but there aren't any games that need the lastest. Stuff's just too new.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Dumb ass I dont care about poor people that cant afford a new gaming rig. Next year I will have x58 mobo with i7 procesor so who is the noob? Ok I pay more, but I get perfomance in games like I want to. And if you were hardcore gamer you will now it, but you are not and just showing us how poor you are.
and who cares if you have 2k to spend on a computer. it shows how pathetic you are.
guess what, in about a year, if i wanted to i can buy what you have now for about 700bucks..welcome to the PC world, or i can buy something better then urs for 2k and tell you your pc sucks hard...
i love vista i wished i got the 64 bit instead of the 32 but oh well my gaming platform is good but i got my motherboard right before PCI express X16 2.0 became popular now it is taking lots of video cards away from PCI express x16 :'( better get a Geforce 8800 ultra before they dry up
I have two Powercolor PCS 4850's in crossfire, E8400@ 4.0 Ghz, 4 Gb 1150 Mhz DDR2 ram, 24" full HDMI monitor = Epic Sexeh gaming power at mid range prices.
Oh, how could I not have Vista on such a monster? People that hate Vista obviously cant afford a good gaming setup and are jealous that their crappy PC's cant handle Vista because of bugs.
Vista has no bugs, your crappy PC is a bug to Vista. WTS Virus scanner and Malware removal. It detected Apple software
I had the option to get Vista for free, in fact I have the 64bit ultimate on my computer(one of my slave HDD's), but I prefer my XP pro 64bit for sure... The only time I use Vista is for crysis and sometimes Bioshock. I personally just don't like the way it looks or the structure. DarkSider will like Windows 7 though, because it is basically going to be Vista with no bugs or RAM leech.
the only reason im still on xp is because i cant afford vista if i could get it for free ide be happy to use it and anyway eventualy microsoft will stop supporting xp so youll have to upgrade but i find it a bit tricky on vista because im so used to xp and yes i have used vista my friend has it
Pretty much any of the post-PixelShaders Direct X could pull any graphic effects. The difference is how much work it takes. Some things that could take days to code with DX9 could take 3 lines of code with DX10, for example. Same way with DX8 vs DX9, and so on. Heck, you could code directly to the videocard buffer! It would just take a few hours to have a freagin rotating cube with gradiant on screen, but you could!
yes 2 gig ram will run smooth on XP cuz it's XP and its not vista vista needs about 1.5 gig of ram to run smooth. then more so programs can run smooth. 3D Mark is to stress your stuff fully. 2 gig is nothing on 3d mark.
you might want to consider upgrading your board to something that will atleast support ddr2 ram if you cant afford one of the new ddr3 boards like a 790 board. Jusy my 2 cents.
The space part would have looked 1000x better without the stupid orange nebula. I wonder why developers always put ugly colorful nebulas in their space games/demonstrations. Apart from that, Vantage is pretty nice.
What he means is alot of programs arn't used to running with four processes which means 2 of the other ones arn't working. by the end of next year everyone might have quad core.
Vista runs fine on 2Gb, it eats up about 1gb doing jack, but I now have 4gb jut for RAM intensive apps, but in my experience 2gb done fine up til now and still is fine for most gaming machines. With 3DMark its mostly about CPU and GPU anyway. Please tell me that Q6600 is nice and overclocked :D My Q9450 is hitting 3.6Ghz but yet to try Vantage out on it
yeah my q6600 is overclocked to 3.4 and i didnt mean my q6600 was slow i ment it wasnt like perfect when G33Kinat*r was acting like the q6600 is a peice of shit but it is not i would like to see his athlonxp run it and yeah 2gb RAM IS fine but i would still like to get 4gb with the price of DDR2 going down a little but it is probibly my video card bcause it is an 8800gts but it is the older 640 mb with only 96stream processors:)
im properbly missing something here. but this does by no measure look as good as several dx9 games out today. It may have all kinds of crazy stuff going on, but it just doesnt look the part.
no, your idea is useless. if it were made for today's systems then it would be too easy to get maxed out scores. this would result in people with high end gpu's having similar scores to those with mid range gpu's.
Don't put so much stock in 3dmark. To me it's just some fancy tech demo which flashes fancy graphics across your screen (and with a louse framerate to boot). The number it spits out in the end is pretty worthless. Then again, I don't give a rats ass about benching, I use my computer for other things.
Water remembered me a GTA Vice City :). I don't see any of super cool water which were promised by Microsoft. It is even worse than I seen in Dx 9 games.
That space part is worth a million. The most impressive thing i have seen in any 3dmark. The rest.. umm nothing special. Havent tested on high or extreme yet...
The animations are horrible, I hope they will never make a game ;) For the benchmark - my pc struggles with it - even if I dont know why, because the eyecandy is, well, not there.
dx10 is supposed to ENHANCE performance together WITH more "eye candy" (idea is: more dx10 = better performance) ... obviously Futuremark did something wrong ...
Yeah, it is supposed to enhance performance, but we know it doesn't (and it hardly looks any better today). Perhaps in a few years game developers can take a full advantage of DX10 and its beauty/performance.
thats false, thats like saying a game is crap simply because its on both console and PC. Its up to the developers to make it work. You can cut down a tree with an axe or a chainsaw, which is better depends on who is using the tools.
Scroll down and click show all comments, then do a Ctrl-F Search for your or my name.
Alternatively, you said that DX10 games were suffering/limited because they supported DX9 aswell. They are tools, and if you know how to use both then there is no set back, games are only ever (not including idiot Publishers) retarded by the developers, not by which version of DX it supports.
How long should i run 3dmark vantage? Does it ever quit running?
unogazzy 4 months ago
the most crapy graphic u can meet in this kind of benchamarks :D they dont show nothing but ur PC will be ALWAYS TOO SLOW :D
pandulec 4 months ago
GPU - 16473 CPU - 19184
:P
HenryFeefan 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Wow. I only get 2 FPS.
TheKatamariguy 11 months ago
SPAM, 360p? And it stutters.............
kingcarcas1349 1 year ago
i get around 7500 on extreme.
RUDY2295 1 year ago
@RUDY2295 LOL I GOT Around 14000
locolalo1364 1 year ago
@locolalo1364 did your rich daddy but you a system from aleinware/dell. or are you just being a dick and telling me this.
RUDY2295 1 year ago
@RUDY2295 LOL I Build my own systems and no i didnt buy a 1000 dollar cpu or even a 300 dollar one with a 400/300 dollar gpu i worked for my system and used old part for it with a decent gpu im still using socket LGA775 and thats about to go obsolete i just wanted to tell you there are ways to get higher scores with mid-range components
locolalo1364 1 year ago
@locolalo1364 well i got 7500 on extreme. not perf.
RUDY2295 1 year ago
1:05 = Best Moment
ashyxt 1 year ago 2
Wow thats a demanding benchmark.
rockgod2131 1 year ago
i get p24768 2x superclocked gtx 280's :)
Eclipezz 2 years ago
I can't install it on Windows 7, I just get this error. :(
>SetupNew\setup.cpp (135)
PAPP:
PVENDOR:
PGUID:
$
@Windows Vista Service Pack 0 (6000) Non IE/Netscaope 8784.112
FunnyMcBunny 2 years ago
p8012
tropessso 2 years ago
HAHAHA this should be like M15+ look at 1:05 and 1:15 both are massive up skirt shots
SCHOAZ 2 years ago
i have like 35 FPS per second in GPU Test. But its sometimes lagging too :\
AMD Phenom II X4 955
Nvidia GTX 285
4 GB RAM
XCARxPILExUPX 2 years ago
wow your comp is the exact same specs as mine lol =) wait is your GTX 285 an XFX Black Edition or just normal?
purew4rrior 2 years ago
i got P19388 :D yaaaaaay
LooseLeaves728 2 years ago
i get about p10689
azraaell 2 years ago
Vantage doesn't seem to be very efficient. Bad performance I mean.
Appule69 2 years ago 2
the driver !
cimvision 2 years ago
How will an 8800GS do as compared to an 8800GTS? 96 stream processors...
prostar2236 2 years ago
There wont be a big difference between those 2. when playing at higher resolution u need higher bandwidth so than the 8800GTS would be a better choice.
Config cores: streamprocessors/textureunits/rop's
8800GS 96/48/12 (65nm)
8800GTS 96/48*/20 (90nm)
GTS has half textures but double adressing units. which makes a higher bandwidth possible but with lesser Texture power.
SynodCenturion 2 years ago
Thanks a lot for the clarification!!
prostar2236 2 years ago
Lol i got 7000 with a pretty good system
Hexl0r 2 years ago
my 3dmark score is 27100
chorinicpker 2 years ago
but which 3dmark?
MCSpidah 2 years ago
Look at my q6600. I have world record in physic test in 3dmark vantage @stock speed without OC
G9q66004gb 2 years ago
as if.
MCSpidah 2 years ago
i got X10572 and P24055 with 2 gtx 260s
greekpanther1 2 years ago
i get 26 fps on test 1 and 25 fps on test 2 with 9850 at 2.8 and 2x 9600gso so odd his is so low
btd247 2 years ago
hell yeah .... 9800gtx+ and q9650@4.3 ghz => 27 fps avg
torentmonkey 2 years ago
[NO sarcasm] wow! you got above 2 fps! that is very impressive! you must have a killer system to be able to do that. [/NO sarcasm]
sbunkboy3 2 years ago 14
dude, i get 10FPS
vicskyline9 2 years ago
LOL yeah, If I really push my system (which I should mention is less than a year old), I could probably get ~5 FPS. Thats how crappy my integrated graphics are. (GeForce 6150SE) lol.
sbunkboy3 2 years ago
Lagg ffs. I got mine GTX 285 on about 24 FPS on that one.
papzilabzi 2 years ago
hah, gtx295 and core i7 920 oc to EE. getting 37fps
snake172 2 years ago
Hehe, 2 gtx295 and core i7 920 oc to EE. Gets 55 fps
homewolf 2 years ago
well unlike you, most of us dont spend that much mony for bragging rights :P
vicskyline9 2 years ago 7
wow, only 24fps? what specs?
my GTX260XT managed to get 27FPS on the first test
joshcj2006 2 years ago
the Pc is under all shit
fetzencomander 2 years ago
lol lag
DjAndy94 2 years ago
LOL 5 FPS
ambucias 2 years ago
u better upgrade u PC before upload video like that next time ^_^
ExontX 2 years ago
lol 5 fps ftw!!!!
puremage000 2 years ago
why upload a video who lag like hell -.-
badcompanydude 2 years ago
why watch a video if u read his pc specs and u AINT thrilled? idiot
adminfx 2 years ago
Lol, still no point watch it because he doesn't write in the title on 8800GTS -.-
badcompanydude 2 years ago
Why the fuck did they make vantage vista only
67Eftw 2 years ago
wait..u cant play this higher than 20Fps on Performance with a8800GTs? ow damn... this program rly needs a Damn high spec machine.
SynodCenturion 2 years ago
lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>llag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>llag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>l
Jellyhat 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>laglag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>laglag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>laglag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>laglag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag
bvb09Fan94 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>lag>
bvb09Fan94 3 years ago
If 3D mark vantage is a nutral test why has the boat got sapphier on it ?
thomaswilson014 3 years ago
dude, its just a sphonsor...think about this: its not a game, so not many people r gona buy it. and its not for consoles so even less sales. plus its a high performance benchmark which means it requires good specs computers to run properly, which means even less sales...whos gona pay for the hard work they put into creating such beautiful real time graphics system? sponsors!
robinmitra1 3 years ago 2
And us. After all, we buy their graphics.
MadeinHell2 3 years ago
what is this 3d mark vantage ??? please answer to my comment, so i can receive an email
wilk8121 3 years ago
3d mark is a benchmark utility to test your pc performance and assign a score to your configuration.
bentleo93 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free 3dmark vanage serials
3DMVA-WJ9YD-YHFJ5-JBA4D-KEEQN-3EKHS-LYCMM-1S98K
3DMVA-AEHPJ-0EFZ4-6HA5Y-S55YS-SF1E0-06VYP-6HR2N
3DMVA-SVTUM-QK1Y5-35061-5DS31-T6UWK-FZFHD-Z7BMQ
3DMVA-D3B8Z-VPKHL-N0PNS-C7UJT-38X9R-UEYVE-U9UDR
:)
r4nd0mh3r02245 3 years ago 8
If some one needs more just PM me.
I got other good soft too like Adobe CS4 Master Collection etc..
Filmer1eX 3 years ago
dude i'm making a game called JUMP ULTRA STARS don't take idea
gomugomunorasengan 3 years ago
lagggg
Killabot123357 3 years ago
7 fps? Fuck off.
hakikifeyk 3 years ago
look at my videos i have all the tests with a core i7 3.2ghz 6gb ram ddr3 2 x 4870x2 crossfire
gamerro25 3 years ago
You only spend 2000+ if you're dumb enough to buy a pre-made from retailers. Buy your own components and put them together, and you can have a decent rig for under 1500. Sure it's not the latest, but there aren't any games that need the lastest. Stuff's just too new.
TheGreatMrKite 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Dumb ass I dont care about poor people that cant afford a new gaming rig. Next year I will have x58 mobo with i7 procesor so who is the noob? Ok I pay more, but I get perfomance in games like I want to. And if you were hardcore gamer you will now it, but you are not and just showing us how poor you are.
elitespa 3 years ago
HA, i'm getting an x58 mobo, an i7, and an ATI 4870x2 next week :)
BallieBalzak 3 years ago
you are very egoist...
galileo021728 3 years ago
and fraps only reduces fps when recording idiots. READ MORE!!!
elitespa 3 years ago
Or if it's an Intel IGP, Fraps uses a 2D overlay which can impact some cards performance because of having to render 3D and 2D.
Pemalite 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
3 words, your pc suck hard, rofl in first test i have 40-60 FPS
Q9450 @ 3,2 GHZ
4GB DDR3 1333Mhz
2x GTX280 SLI
Vista x64 Ultimate.
I have 23120 points in Vantage (perfomance)
Owned :D
elitespa 3 years ago
lol 3 words? thats 4 dumbass...
and who cares if you have 2k to spend on a computer. it shows how pathetic you are.
guess what, in about a year, if i wanted to i can buy what you have now for about 700bucks..welcome to the PC world, or i can buy something better then urs for 2k and tell you your pc sucks hard...
TSX028 3 years ago 3
true..buying the newest pc hardware is a waist of money..every 3 months or so prices drop and something new will come out.
im a happy owner of a
msi p35 neo2-fr
intel E8600
2 gigs ocz reaper
and a 8800gts A.D xxx edition (512mb)
Silverstone 650W psu ..nice choice..had the same one,but replaced it with a Cooler Master M700
Lexusstylie 3 years ago
The good news, you have a decent pc.
the bad news, you have the IQ of a squirrel
XMTsync 3 years ago
Fraps reduces performance only if you are recording video, but this is half true because if you have a good rig you don't notice that.
Carlovfx 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
haha wtf 4 a lag, damnit
ur pc is crap
ObyCoby 3 years ago
FRAPS reduces performance by half, FYI.
Mortalife2 3 years ago
You do know fraps is used for recording GAMES?
Ashedmore 3 years ago 2
Well actually it's used for recording DirectX applications, which this is.
Idiot.
therevengeofsaladboy 3 years ago
this is normal for recording a video. dont say the crap pc for now. pls respect the videohoster ;)
Mordekai08 3 years ago
Why don't you post your computer running it then, douche.
elizle 3 years ago
i love vista i wished i got the 64 bit instead of the 32 but oh well my gaming platform is good but i got my motherboard right before PCI express X16 2.0 became popular now it is taking lots of video cards away from PCI express x16 :'( better get a Geforce 8800 ultra before they dry up
knockdoun 3 years ago
Vista is fucking A+++++++++++++++
I have two Powercolor PCS 4850's in crossfire, E8400@ 4.0 Ghz, 4 Gb 1150 Mhz DDR2 ram, 24" full HDMI monitor = Epic Sexeh gaming power at mid range prices.
Oh, how could I not have Vista on such a monster? People that hate Vista obviously cant afford a good gaming setup and are jealous that their crappy PC's cant handle Vista because of bugs.
Vista has no bugs, your crappy PC is a bug to Vista. WTS Virus scanner and Malware removal. It detected Apple software
bhavvv 3 years ago 2
I like vista too, no problems so far, and its fast, smooth. And just good.
IMattNovakI 3 years ago 2
yeah i used to think vista sucked (got the 64 bit version), then i upgraded from 1 to 4 gigs of ram and now it runs faster than XP did
avp715 3 years ago
OMFG your poor little feelings get hurt too quickly.
So STFU or GTFO.
ThexDarksider 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Vista is shit and crap.
I like to call it "buggy and incomplete".
ThexDarksider 3 years ago
That's what all broke-ass-losers-who-can't-afford-vista say. How about you try it out first, dork.
jlarpi 3 years ago
I had the option to get Vista for free, in fact I have the 64bit ultimate on my computer(one of my slave HDD's), but I prefer my XP pro 64bit for sure... The only time I use Vista is for crysis and sometimes Bioshock. I personally just don't like the way it looks or the structure. DarkSider will like Windows 7 though, because it is basically going to be Vista with no bugs or RAM leech.
BTW specs are
asus 750a mb
9800gx2
corsair dom 1066
9950 phenom black ed.
4 crappy hard drives :P
eppinizer 3 years ago
Vista is actually great. Go to any hardware enthusiast site and you'll see everyone uses Vista64.
You're probably the idiots that think macintrashes are good LMAO
igob8a 3 years ago
the only reason im still on xp is because i cant afford vista if i could get it for free ide be happy to use it and anyway eventualy microsoft will stop supporting xp so youll have to upgrade but i find it a bit tricky on vista because im so used to xp and yes i have used vista my friend has it
bogieman987 3 years ago
I watched Colleen build the UGM "Ultimate Gaming machine" She had three Nvidia 280's in there, and it ran this smooth as butter.
She could have had better performance has she soldered the boards like i suggested.. but whatever.
PrecisionEngineered 3 years ago
ty huju
Rozruchiwacz 3 years ago
HAY GUYES I H8 VISTA CUZ ITS COOL TO h8 iT..is what im preety much what im geting form these comments.
veblice 3 years ago
Is it just me or do this lag like Hl.. ?
danielkoolno 3 years ago
vantage lags for everyone not using 4 gpu's
lol
runie360 3 years ago
Bad prosessor
fytech 3 years ago
i hate vista&3D mark
Rakinroww 3 years ago
+1, friend))
FFantasyIX 3 years ago
die faggot
teamforteress 3 years ago
My rig could handle this fine, but it turns out you need vista. How lame.
TySpoonz 3 years ago
I don't get why the hell you need vista to run this.. Dx9 can easily pull off all the graphic effects in this benchmark.
Damn you Microsoft and your lame-ass resource hogging good for nothing vista!
At least I'm very happy that vista sales are falling low compared to XP!
rodzandz 3 years ago
Pretty much any of the post-PixelShaders Direct X could pull any graphic effects. The difference is how much work it takes. Some things that could take days to code with DX9 could take 3 lines of code with DX10, for example. Same way with DX8 vs DX9, and so on. Heck, you could code directly to the videocard buffer! It would just take a few hours to have a freagin rotating cube with gradiant on screen, but you could!
shadosatblackphoenix 3 years ago 2
uh, no.
dx8 (sm1.3) has way a too low limit for simultaneous shaders instructions on a cene (something like 16 instructions)
dx9 (sm2) took that up to 96
dx9.1 (sm3) rose that up again to 512 or something
dunno about dx10 tho
beside, pre-sm2 cards have fixed shader effects (not programable)
so no, you can't render anything on any dx
sm4 has also a few (veeeeeeery few) stuff that can't be done on sm3
ps: some of this stuff might be a little off.
GraveUypo 3 years ago
nice with my E6600 3.2GHZ and HD 4870 i get final score 7029
toto233 3 years ago
yes 2 gig ram will run smooth on XP cuz it's XP and its not vista vista needs about 1.5 gig of ram to run smooth. then more so programs can run smooth. 3D Mark is to stress your stuff fully. 2 gig is nothing on 3d mark.
also have some respect.
G33kinator 3 years ago
you might want to consider upgrading your board to something that will atleast support ddr2 ram if you cant afford one of the new ddr3 boards like a 790 board. Jusy my 2 cents.
manictrance 3 years ago
The space part would have looked 1000x better without the stupid orange nebula. I wonder why developers always put ugly colorful nebulas in their space games/demonstrations. Apart from that, Vantage is pretty nice.
KingHaggis 3 years ago
Depends what u have it set on FPS recording if it 1 it only uses 1 fps :P
G33kinator 3 years ago
uber bad pc lol
G33kinator 3 years ago
my q6600 2gb ram wasnt fast lest see u run it
AMDvsIntel 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
q96600 stinks. and 2 gig of ram for vista is bad. u need at least 4 to run smooth.
G33kinator 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i have 2gb and it runs just as smooths as xp and my q6600 is fine so u can just go fuck urslf!
AMDvsIntel 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
read what i posted.
G33kinator 3 years ago
What he means is alot of programs arn't used to running with four processes which means 2 of the other ones arn't working. by the end of next year everyone might have quad core.
BlackPachment 3 years ago
Vista runs fine on 2Gb, it eats up about 1gb doing jack, but I now have 4gb jut for RAM intensive apps, but in my experience 2gb done fine up til now and still is fine for most gaming machines. With 3DMark its mostly about CPU and GPU anyway. Please tell me that Q6600 is nice and overclocked :D My Q9450 is hitting 3.6Ghz but yet to try Vantage out on it
DbCSteelLegion 3 years ago
yeah my q6600 is overclocked to 3.4 and i didnt mean my q6600 was slow i ment it wasnt like perfect when G33Kinat*r was acting like the q6600 is a peice of shit but it is not i would like to see his athlonxp run it and yeah 2gb RAM IS fine but i would still like to get 4gb with the price of DDR2 going down a little but it is probibly my video card bcause it is an 8800gts but it is the older 640 mb with only 96stream processors:)
AMDvsIntel 3 years ago
it wasnt like 30fps
AMDvsIntel 3 years ago
last part is lame
Feedfront 3 years ago
dam thats laggy
marc4life22 3 years ago
Man this is a huge leap from 3dmark 06, as it should be but damn this looks nice.
To bad Vista is needed though...
5chr4pn3ll 3 years ago
im properbly missing something here. but this does by no measure look as good as several dx9 games out today. It may have all kinds of crazy stuff going on, but it just doesnt look the part.
fucknuaf 3 years ago
This is entirely run off of the graphics card, games are not.
theshadowcult 3 years ago
3dmark NEVER has sound. if you see a video with sound, some one added it in.
sgdude1337 3 years ago
ok just tested my comp and yeah Fps 7 :(
2sauber2 3 years ago
why is not there any sound ?
szkcs 3 years ago
because 3dmark doesn't have sound
turboflame12 3 years ago
i get 2-12 FPS lol!!! thanks for the trouble Intel Chipset!
PIKACHU49386 3 years ago
:D 7 FPS
2sauber2 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
it looks like shit in performance mode. And it laggs like shit too.
jdwnielsen 3 years ago
So your computer runs it smoothly?
EvilPeter83 3 years ago 2
Noo, it runs like shit on my one :) that's what i tried to tell
jdwnielsen 2 years ago
Benchmarks should be made for today's cards, not for non-existent hardware. Useless.
RealNC 3 years ago
no, your idea is useless. if it were made for today's systems then it would be too easy to get maxed out scores. this would result in people with high end gpu's having similar scores to those with mid range gpu's.
sirfirebob 3 years ago
3DMark Vantage is more physical and much more detailed, i guess 1.5GB for the installation.
REALISTIC,even those breasts bouncesss...hehe love that part
Futuremark, you done it again.
lnitialDrift 3 years ago 4
holy shit its beautiful!
KaiForce 3 years ago
this is sick....my PC is just 1.5 Years old and I reach 1 FPS XD
dsfatman 3 years ago 2
After watching the jane nash demo, I was suprised that futuremark actually brought back DirectX 7
lazyassbum 3 years ago
9FPS.. damn
Jimderkaisser 3 years ago
i'm alirght donwload free version..30% complet..i have Q6600 2.4Ghz@3.5Ghz,4 GB rams DDR2 ( yeah DDR2 ) HD3870 512MB , and for sure Vista..but only DX10..not DX10.1
Jimderkaisser 3 years ago
3870 supports 10.1 dude
Get the update here:
gamesforwindows(dot)com/en-US/aboutgfw/Pages/directx10-a(dot)aspx
CaptainMorgan32 3 years ago
i have fake windows..
Jimderkaisser 3 years ago
nice slideshow
bashmahs 3 years ago
thanks for the recording
zaim69 3 years ago
i thaink animation not smooth
jajaboss 3 years ago
It's not smooth cos the guy's hw "sucks".. Only the real high-end rigs would run this program somewhat smooth..
juusoh89 3 years ago
lol 1:09 GOT PWNED
nemesiselite0 3 years ago
Nick FM is just stup1d ...!
I think Patrick Ojala is ar better for his 3DMark06's Canyon Flight and Firefly Forest ...
Nick is just DUMB .... UGLY graphic and ran very slow .... LoL, he didn't understand how to create a w0w demo with DX10 .... bleh!
buthetbecco 3 years ago
Heh, 3DMark Vantage... More like 3DMark Vintage
ausmods 3 years ago 4
Don't put so much stock in 3dmark. To me it's just some fancy tech demo which flashes fancy graphics across your screen (and with a louse framerate to boot). The number it spits out in the end is pretty worthless. Then again, I don't give a rats ass about benching, I use my computer for other things.
ballebanan 3 years ago
sweet Jesus..
FreshSoup 3 years ago
For all the people bashing the graphics in this... THERE ARE STILL 2 HIGHER QUALITY SETTINGS THEN THIS! You just need to buy the program to get them.
N3\/\/B2
RichGilly 3 years ago
same quality, I've ever tried in High and Extreme mode. Stupid Nick FM
buthetbecco 3 years ago
I wonder when games will look like this.
Decenium 3 years ago
its called crysis, which looks A LOT better then this. Atleast the opening part EVE online looks like the space demonstration
ff7redxiii 3 years ago
LoLzers your right hahaha.
Decenium 3 years ago
Water remembered me a GTA Vice City :). I don't see any of super cool water which were promised by Microsoft. It is even worse than I seen in Dx 9 games.
DjZielony 3 years ago
That space part is worth a million. The most impressive thing i have seen in any 3dmark. The rest.. umm nothing special. Havent tested on high or extreme yet...
ali4s 3 years ago
The animations are horrible, I hope they will never make a game ;) For the benchmark - my pc struggles with it - even if I dont know why, because the eyecandy is, well, not there.
derFeef 3 years ago
Honestly...crysis looks better and crysis has a much better performance. This benchmark is shit.
gamershell 3 years ago
This one has intentionally more DX10 effects and "eye candy" than Crysis - that's why it runs slower.
jimgo5 3 years ago 6
dx10 is supposed to ENHANCE performance together WITH more "eye candy" (idea is: more dx10 = better performance) ... obviously Futuremark did something wrong ...
Scheinweltname 3 years ago
Yeah, it is supposed to enhance performance, but we know it doesn't (and it hardly looks any better today). Perhaps in a few years game developers can take a full advantage of DX10 and its beauty/performance.
jimgo5 3 years ago
I have heard that DX10 does not run that well because all the games that use it also support DX9.
If a game was made only with DX10 from the start is should run better.
But there not doing this because not many people use Vista and a DX10 card.
Decenium 3 years ago
thats false, thats like saying a game is crap simply because its on both console and PC. Its up to the developers to make it work. You can cut down a tree with an axe or a chainsaw, which is better depends on who is using the tools.
theshadowcult 3 years ago
What is false?
Sorry I can't seem to find my post.
Decenium 3 years ago
Scroll down and click show all comments, then do a Ctrl-F Search for your or my name.
Alternatively, you said that DX10 games were suffering/limited because they supported DX9 aswell. They are tools, and if you know how to use both then there is no set back, games are only ever (not including idiot Publishers) retarded by the developers, not by which version of DX it supports.
theshadowcult 3 years ago
ehi tools do not complain this is a performance preset....
I wanna see what it can deliver at extreme!
The presets are:
Entry, Performance, High and Extreme
Like video games LOL!!
sariosto 3 years ago
How can u run a benchmark and record it at the same time? must request huge ammout of CPU ussage no? Or did you record with a webcam or smth?
soulsh0t 3 years ago
The space part was amazing!
Pity it's not a game.
And im with Jeff on the Xp Pro part.
moshmachine 3 years ago
This is a benchmark, not a game. All 3DMark versions chug when run on standard hardware upon release.
KoroushGhazi 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Wow, dx10's performance is horrible. I suggest you ditch vista and install xp pro. You will feel much better afterwards.
jeffwads 3 years ago
Do you have any idea who your talking to?
Im pretty sure he knows whats best for his computer.
Skyfallkavu 3 years ago 2