I've been steamrolled by every process I've tried; they all involved arguing. Yes, the old-school patriot ideas are flawed but there has been progress. The latest understanding is that the controversy must be settled before you even get a ticket.
I'm not sure what you mean by that, but watch all of my videos, they will show what is really going on with all the latest and greatest. The idea that a controversy must not be entered into is one of the first lessons of all freedom-seeking law students; controvery is for courts. That's not where we want to be, and we certainly don't want to argue a single issue they raise ("going to the merits"). To do so is fatal. Steamroll is the tactic they use. This material is about staying the path.
A not guilty plea is dishonor and makes you a debtor in the case. You become the surety for the debt created by dishonoring the offer.
The court is nothing more than a collection agency for the US debt. They trick us in to being the debtor when we are actually the creditor. The fines are nothing. Once they have your signature, they can create funds just like a bank and multiply your fine by 10 as an asset in their books.
While I appreciate the view, what you're describing is old-school patriot mythology that I don't want to promote in the methods I teach. There is no remedy in what you're suggesting. I think it's possible you are correct, but I'm not bringing up any of those issues in my processes to a govt official; it doesn't address the process, and guarantees steamroll. It's common sense that debt is being serviced, as all FRN commerce is debt by definition. However, there is no proof of signature as asset.
I've been steamrolled by every process I've tried; they all involved arguing. Yes, the old-school patriot ideas are flawed but there has been progress. The latest understanding is that the controversy must be settled before you even get a ticket.
dus777 3 years ago
I'm not sure what you mean by that, but watch all of my videos, they will show what is really going on with all the latest and greatest. The idea that a controversy must not be entered into is one of the first lessons of all freedom-seeking law students; controvery is for courts. That's not where we want to be, and we certainly don't want to argue a single issue they raise ("going to the merits"). To do so is fatal. Steamroll is the tactic they use. This material is about staying the path.
TrafficTicketWinner 3 years ago
A not guilty plea is dishonor and makes you a debtor in the case. You become the surety for the debt created by dishonoring the offer.
The court is nothing more than a collection agency for the US debt. They trick us in to being the debtor when we are actually the creditor. The fines are nothing. Once they have your signature, they can create funds just like a bank and multiply your fine by 10 as an asset in their books.
dus777 3 years ago
While I appreciate the view, what you're describing is old-school patriot mythology that I don't want to promote in the methods I teach. There is no remedy in what you're suggesting. I think it's possible you are correct, but I'm not bringing up any of those issues in my processes to a govt official; it doesn't address the process, and guarantees steamroll. It's common sense that debt is being serviced, as all FRN commerce is debt by definition. However, there is no proof of signature as asset.
TrafficTicketWinner 3 years ago