Why don't you show results of dam failures, result of ore mining needed for wind turbines or hungry people when land is occupied by solar panels? Not speaking how dirty and environment disastrous is mining and processing of rare metals needed for both, wind turbines and solar panels.
You are so ignorant I think this video should be taken down, ohh and FYI nuclear plants can't explode... and they dont release radiation... hopefully you failed
You neglect to to mention the fact that the children in this video are descendants probably of the Chernobyl incident where a vast amount of radiation leaked into the area. It takes quite a lot of radiation, or a long time of exposure to cause these harmful effects. For the asian man, it's possible he was around the hiroshima/nagasaki area during WW2, again, getting a vast amount of radiation exposure. Nuclear energy doesn't leak that sort of radiation into the environment.
Nuclear has large start up costs but also small expenses and huge profits once completed otherwise they wouldn't get investors and France, being 80% nuclear has the cheapest electricity in Europe and also decreased its air pollution five fold with the lowest green house gas emissions. It's like the old saying goes "if you're not a rebel by the age of 20, you got no heart, but if you haven't turned establishment by 30, you've got no brains".
Annual waste from one reactor will fit into a pickup truck and the fuel from 50 years of reactor operation will fit in a football field amounting to 77,000 tons. We discard 179,000 tons of batteries a year & they contain toxic heavy metals. There are not only massive subsidies for solar & wind but these have been mandated into law by Germany,Denmark &USA. Electricity co’s don’t use them because they’re reliable and efficient, but because of government legislation.
Wind farms require 60,000 acres per 1.2GW when a conventional plant only requires 200 acres, that’s 300 times more space. There's protests in Germany cos they're clearing part of the black forest for a wind farm. When solar panels expire after the average 25 years they must be disposed of in toxic dumps as they contain highly toxic metals, gases & solvents that are carcinogenic. Some of these toxic substances in solar panels will never decay, never ending life span.
The picture of the house next door to the house is stupid. In any case better than being next to a coal plant. Another perspective is that the amount of waste produced by nuclear power is 2 pounds for each person (fits into a coke can) compared to 68 tonnes of coal put into the atmosphere per person. Coal fired plants expose the population to around 200 times more radioactive by-products than nuclear power plants do in their entire life cycle.
here, i'm making a movie too! its called The Idiots Who Protest Nuclear Power But Have No Idea What Coal Power Is! to long? i guess ill shorten it to RETARDS
Well done we all need to fight against "New clear" power, it's a thread against humanity - Let's make the switch to reneables the faster the better :-) NCO - Denmark.
I say we underestimate the power of the sun It is just a matter of how we harness it .Nukes are a bad idea and just not worth the risk I would rather breath smog than fallout
@decycle1 Normal coil we burn contains uranium and thorium minerals which are released with the smoke, thus emitting radioactive contamination. In fact, burning fossil fuels for certain amount of energy releases more contamination, than using nuclear power to generate the same amount of energy. And while fossil fuel emission is in the form of smoke released in the atmosphere, nuclear waste goes into safe places like under the mountains in American deserts. (Interesting fact: deserts are dry!)
@NihilistMachinery you speak misinformation, yes fossil fuels such as coal contain some radiocativity but lets be clear it is naturally occuring radioactivity which is very diffuse in nature not the concentrated radioactivity created when we process uranium and then feed it into reactors. The problem of radwaste is not solved as you suggest. Yucca mountain in America it is not operational nor will it be as there is tectonic movement in there which has rendered it unsuitable
@AIRburst95 nuclear reactors are like corporate weapons of liability. Once installed their liability is used to influence your government against the will of the people and "YOU PAY FOR IT"
Great job on a very moving and informative subject. You know another good point is that renewable energy creates more jobs since the alternative green energy sources don't produce as much energy as nuke & fossil fuel plants, it means that more jobs will have to be created to build more biomass, wind, wave, etc power plants. Plus more jobs for people who maintain them. Good all around. Replace the AZ crater image with Fukushima?
@cactustree505 But then you come across major problems. The largest wind plant in the world generates only 800MW, yet covers about 400 square km. The Fukushima plant in Japan produces 11,000 MW in just a few acres. With a growing population and the need to feed that, power technology must get smaller, not larger. You need that land for farming and housing.
Great job on a very moving and informative subject. You know another good point is that renewable energy creates more jobs since the alternative green energy sources don't produce as much energy as nuke & fossil fuel plants, it means that more jobs will have to be created to build more biomass, wind, wave, etc power plants. Plus more jobs for people who maintain them. Good all around.
Why don't you show results of dam failures, result of ore mining needed for wind turbines or hungry people when land is occupied by solar panels? Not speaking how dirty and environment disastrous is mining and processing of rare metals needed for both, wind turbines and solar panels.
ltomsik 1 month ago
wow, this is so ridiculously dumb
gornicek 1 month ago
If you are against nuclear power, you do not know anything about nuclear power.
shinokiba 1 month ago
You are so ignorant I think this video should be taken down, ohh and FYI nuclear plants can't explode... and they dont release radiation... hopefully you failed
cchapli 1 month ago
You neglect to to mention the fact that the children in this video are descendants probably of the Chernobyl incident where a vast amount of radiation leaked into the area. It takes quite a lot of radiation, or a long time of exposure to cause these harmful effects. For the asian man, it's possible he was around the hiroshima/nagasaki area during WW2, again, getting a vast amount of radiation exposure. Nuclear energy doesn't leak that sort of radiation into the environment.
brantiela 1 month ago
Nuclear has large start up costs but also small expenses and huge profits once completed otherwise they wouldn't get investors and France, being 80% nuclear has the cheapest electricity in Europe and also decreased its air pollution five fold with the lowest green house gas emissions. It's like the old saying goes "if you're not a rebel by the age of 20, you got no heart, but if you haven't turned establishment by 30, you've got no brains".
d2099y 3 months ago
Annual waste from one reactor will fit into a pickup truck and the fuel from 50 years of reactor operation will fit in a football field amounting to 77,000 tons. We discard 179,000 tons of batteries a year & they contain toxic heavy metals. There are not only massive subsidies for solar & wind but these have been mandated into law by Germany,Denmark &USA. Electricity co’s don’t use them because they’re reliable and efficient, but because of government legislation.
d2099y 3 months ago
Wind farms require 60,000 acres per 1.2GW when a conventional plant only requires 200 acres, that’s 300 times more space. There's protests in Germany cos they're clearing part of the black forest for a wind farm. When solar panels expire after the average 25 years they must be disposed of in toxic dumps as they contain highly toxic metals, gases & solvents that are carcinogenic. Some of these toxic substances in solar panels will never decay, never ending life span.
d2099y 3 months ago
The picture of the house next door to the house is stupid. In any case better than being next to a coal plant. Another perspective is that the amount of waste produced by nuclear power is 2 pounds for each person (fits into a coke can) compared to 68 tonnes of coal put into the atmosphere per person. Coal fired plants expose the population to around 200 times more radioactive by-products than nuclear power plants do in their entire life cycle.
d2099y 3 months ago
here, i'm making a movie too! its called The Idiots Who Protest Nuclear Power But Have No Idea What Coal Power Is! to long? i guess ill shorten it to RETARDS
AIRburst95 4 months ago
Well done we all need to fight against "New clear" power, it's a thread against humanity - Let's make the switch to reneables the faster the better :-) NCO - Denmark.
dk1969nco 6 months ago
I say we underestimate the power of the sun It is just a matter of how we harness it .Nukes are a bad idea and just not worth the risk I would rather breath smog than fallout
decycle1 9 months ago
@decycle1 Normal coil we burn contains uranium and thorium minerals which are released with the smoke, thus emitting radioactive contamination. In fact, burning fossil fuels for certain amount of energy releases more contamination, than using nuclear power to generate the same amount of energy. And while fossil fuel emission is in the form of smoke released in the atmosphere, nuclear waste goes into safe places like under the mountains in American deserts. (Interesting fact: deserts are dry!)
NihilistMachinery 7 months ago
@NihilistMachinery you speak misinformation, yes fossil fuels such as coal contain some radiocativity but lets be clear it is naturally occuring radioactivity which is very diffuse in nature not the concentrated radioactivity created when we process uranium and then feed it into reactors. The problem of radwaste is not solved as you suggest. Yucca mountain in America it is not operational nor will it be as there is tectonic movement in there which has rendered it unsuitable
nikkinomad 6 months ago
@decycle1 and of coarse the sun is a F*CKING NUCLEAR REACTOR! hydrogen + helium going through FUSSION = SUN
AIRburst95 4 months ago
@AIRburst95 nuclear reactors are like corporate weapons of liability. Once installed their liability is used to influence your government against the will of the people and "YOU PAY FOR IT"
decycle1 4 months ago
@decycle1 OK idiot liberal douchebag please please tell me how "I WILL PAY FOR IT" fuck, where are u getting you're info THEGOPRUNSTHEWORLD(dot)com!
AIRburst95 4 months ago
@AIRburst95 why the belligerence
decycle1 4 months ago
Great job on a very moving and informative subject. You know another good point is that renewable energy creates more jobs since the alternative green energy sources don't produce as much energy as nuke & fossil fuel plants, it means that more jobs will have to be created to build more biomass, wind, wave, etc power plants. Plus more jobs for people who maintain them. Good all around. Replace the AZ crater image with Fukushima?
cactustree505 11 months ago
@cactustree505 But then you come across major problems. The largest wind plant in the world generates only 800MW, yet covers about 400 square km. The Fukushima plant in Japan produces 11,000 MW in just a few acres. With a growing population and the need to feed that, power technology must get smaller, not larger. You need that land for farming and housing.
halo07guy2 10 months ago
Great job on a very moving and informative subject. You know another good point is that renewable energy creates more jobs since the alternative green energy sources don't produce as much energy as nuke & fossil fuel plants, it means that more jobs will have to be created to build more biomass, wind, wave, etc power plants. Plus more jobs for people who maintain them. Good all around.
cactustree505 11 months ago