Added: 3 years ago
From: OutcastUNO
Views: 83,593
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (127)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I didnt see a god damn thing!!

  • @SemiFlacid After studying over 8000 reports of government-caused deaths, Rummel estimates that there have been 262 million victims of democide in the last century.

    So Why damn God?

  • nice missle....

  • @prosperomage wrote: "the engines very likely hit the ground and were torn off the wings"

    No report indicates that engines were torn off. LOOK at the pictures of the "cleanup crew" walking in front of the building. There are no gouges in the ground or scorched earth anywhere in the line of flight that indicate that "engines hit the ground and were torn off." Why are you making things up now? I thought the "official" reports were everything you needed! Since NIST ignores the wings so can you?

  • How do you know what it should look like, are you a structural engineer? If so, go argue with the other engineers that said this is about right. Go argue with all of the people on the ground that SAW A BIG ASS JET HIT.

    Your argument against all of the mounds of evidence is "it doesn't look right to me"

  • @Elthenar You wrote:"If so, go argue with the other engineers that said this is about right. Go argue with all of the people on the ground that SAW A BIG ASS JET HIT."

    Typical sheeple rhetoric. Since you aren't a "structural engineer" you aren't allowed to think.

    Do you have to be a doctor to know the difference between a hand and a foot? Neither do I need to be a "structural engineer" to know that a 757 has wings and BIG ASS JET ENGINES that should have at least made a freakin' mark.

  • @MrIHADANACCOUNT I am "sheeple" because I don't believe your theory over numerous eye witnesses that saw a huge jet?

    Yes you, the random idiot on youtube, are better versed in what happened than the people who were actually there and say what happened.

  • If no plane hit the Pentagon, where did Flight 77 actually go? Were the people who phoned loved ones from the hijacked plane in on it too? If they went to the trouble of hijacking the plane to dispose of it for the cover-up, why not just go ahead and fly the damn thing in to the Pentagon?

    You conspiracy theorists suffer from very poor critical thinking.

  • @Elthenar If a plane did hit the Pentagon, why was is the hole smaller than the diameter of the plane's body and why are there no features consistent with what the wings of a jet would cause? Critical thinking causes a rational person to realize that the single hole was too small to have been caused by Flight 77. I don't have to know what caused the hole, but I do know that Flight 77 could not have done it. Those who believe that Flight 77 caused the damage are the conspiracy theorists.

  • @MrIHADANACCOUNT -- There are no "missiles" as big as the thing in this video.

    The hole in the wall IS consistent with the size of a 757 fuselage.

    And why would the wings destroy reinforced concrete?

  • @prosperomage You believe that the wings could NOT have destroyed reinforced concrete but the fuselage which is made of the same exact materials did destroy reinforced concrete. There isn't so much as a mark on the freakin' paint that indicates there were wings you idiot!

  • @MrIHADANACCOUNT -- It's interesting how some people only answer the part that is convenient for them.

    There are no "missiles" as big as the object in this video.

    As low as the thing was when it hit, the engines very likely hit the ground and were torn off the wings.

    And if you don't know that there is a lot less mass in a wing than in a fuselage, then you probably have never seen a real airplane.

  • @prosperomage

    HT TP : / / Citizen Investigation Team . com

  • Fukin total shite

  • Sigh. The video is fake & has been known to be so for at least a year before you posted it. The aerial shots come from a DOD film and are available as stock footage. The 'missile' is CGI. Note how there is no smoke moving upward after 'impact' nor any damage to the inner rings.

    Still doubtful? Compare the trees in the courtyard with those in a real aerial shot taken on 9-11: tinyurl . com /77b3ck4 (remove spaces, scroll down).

    Also, work on your analysis skills since it's an obvious fake.

  • pathetic

  • get a life man !

  • where's the big fireball and smoke when it hits?

  • Come on. Fess up...... You screwballs that say a missile hit the Pentagon... Admit you're wearing a tin foil hat, right now. hahahaha

  • This is a fake- the aerial footage seen doctored here was not shot on 9/11/2001

  • All the people who said they watched a plane go into the Pentagon... were they all in on the conspiracy, too? (rolls eyes)

  • @Huntington12345678 its very possible, yeah

  • @SERGEda3RD ... It's very not. Enjoy your tin foil hat, nutjob. hahaha

  • @Huntington12345678 enjoy hitting puberty when you get there, and the tin foil hat thing was a bit corny, you a sheep like the rest of them haha you're the governments bitch, you're obamas hooker

  • @SERGEda3RD ... hahaha! Do you have any pictures of the Loch Ness Monster, that lives in your pool?

  • Comment removed

  • around the 20 second mark u can see the explosion move with the camera. Dude take this garbage off the internet. Its people like u that make it easier for the goverment and others to shrug off the questions we are asking and the answers we demand.

  • go to hell

  • Google "35mm Stock Footage of Washington DC aerials"

  • The pentagon was hit by a middle that's a fact but this video is fake in my opinion bc in all the other videos of the pentagon theres an big fire ball and this simulation only shows the impact whole on fire with no smoke or fire ball

  • Truth hurts dont it for the ppl who think that terrorist from caves! Who some are still alive lol cause the usa security to shut down the whole day

  • cant beleive in 2011 retards still think a plane hit the pentagon!! AND evidence PROVES NO plane hit pentagon, no plane crashed into a feild and the twin towers were rigged by the US gov themselves. deal with it.

  • @bjm351

    DUDE I HATE YOU! THERE WERE PLANES THAT HIT THEM!

  • @traumacenterguilt lol! =D you just hate that im right!!

  • @bjm351 Those towers were rigged by liberals and truthers.

  • Who cares if it's real or not, a frickin' plane crashed into the Pentagon.

  • @datboysha40 agreed it was a plane, evidence proves it ^-^

  • Looks much more real than Barry´s birth certificate.

  • its not a plane the goverment want you to think it is god dam brainwashed dumbasses its a god dam missile look at the fucking thing or go to specsavers the goverment wants to control you hmm let me add that up Goverment+Dumbfucks+Brainwashe­d Dumbfucks= Retarded RetardedDumbBrainWashedFucks there thats settled nicely

  • It was missile painted to look just like a plane and they know it. There are pictures of it out there. Just go to my channel. second video on my favorites. Hell with it here it is. Watch all the way threw tell me what you think of this one? GIadv36dcjU. I do believe we have nail these bastards. Thanks for viewing. It's the only one like it out there.

  • scud

  • LMFAO, it came from the opposite angle

  • They might want to start this fake video of a something?hitting the building at the right angle! This thing ain't

  • Those 80 odd videos will probably never be released.

    You can bet your life not a single one of them shows the stated plane.

    Why did the FBI go around to gas stations and hotels seizing footage when they have plenty of evidence from the pentagon cameras?

    Why dont they kill the conspiracy dead by releasing evidence?

  • @zenoist2 they can't release the evidence dipshit...you need to read up on the chain of evidence procedures with regard to criminal cases (which is what the videos are, evidence of a crime). They can not be released until the justice department has completed all of the prosecutions pertaining to the event, and since the main suspect continues to elude...you're more than likely not to see them until he's caught or killed.

  • @Oz1976 would that be osama? Go and look at the FBI page where he has nothing at all to do with 9/11.

    Severe lack of evidence.

    Hes very conveniently missing.

    He pops up in countries the USA wants to invade now and then as the perfect excuse.

    He also died years ago.

  • @Oz1976 "which is what the videos are, evidence of a crime"

    There are NO other videos to release, period. The FBI list makes this perfectly clear, but the lame little Truthies keep making up stories about other videotapes. It's nonsense.

  • i think Americans need to start a Public Interest Litigation suit ..demanding to release some of the tens of videos confiscated from all around the vicinity.

    anyone agree?

  • its soooo fake omg ur dumb as shit, and no missle hit it!

  • Clearly a fake. The south side of the building should have a second and third corridor pedestrian bridge/ landing for access by pedestrians to the second floor entrances for those corridors. The first was completed in 1999 therefore these aerial views predate 1999.

  • Looks to me like this thing hits at a different angle than the surveillence video.

  • just my opinion: doubt this video is real ..but think it was a missile that actually hit that day

  • @vjt9 if it was a missle it wud have caused more damage and it wud not explode on contact, and even if it was a missile the pentagon wud have anti missile defenses and wud have stopped it

  • @vjt9 No missile capable of flying in like that would be capable of carrying that much jet fuel.

    (Just my professional opinion as a veteran military fire fighter.)

  • @leftysergeant : i think i agree with you bro ..a military fighter jet ..it was then (that could probably also explain the crazy maneuvers before impact, which were pretty much impossible for a 757)

    @Chuggers456 : ..an anti-air-strike defense system would also take an aircraft out :)

  • @vjt9 no a fucking plane hit it...people need to do more than just read/watch the god damned conspiracy theories. Especially when they're presented by people with no fucking status in the field they're trying to argue their points from. (debunking911 . com)

  • @Oz1976 So what about architects and engineers for 911 truth? Over 200 architects and engineers, producing concrete evidence that buildings 1, 2 and 7 were brought down by explosives in a controlled demolition. I guess they don't have any status in the architectural and engineering fields then? Oh wait...

  • @SamAG99 You mean the ones that are making money off of all this, they have a fucking STORE link on their website. They site NOTHING new on their page. Everything they site as "evidence" has been said by truthers since the beginning...and the main thing they site that proves them wrong...PYROCLASTIC FLOWS. BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. They say they have 1500 "verified architectural / structural professionals"...yet only 64 people donated in their latest fundraiser, Richard Gage is a nut job.

  • @Oz1976 I know they didn't come up with it all, they simply produce the evidence well, without speculation or guesses, simply stating the evidence. You're a nut job?

  • @SamAG99 globalbrief . ca/tomquiggin/2010/05/01/911-c­onspiracy-theories-%E2%80%93-d­ebunking-richard-gage/

  • @Oz1976 Not sure if you realise this, but that link proves absolutely nothing. It's not even dealing with evidence, just basically telling you you're wrong. They kept the Manhattan project pretty nicely hidden, remember? ;)

  • @SamAG99 "Over 200 architects and engineers ... I guess they don't have any status in the architectural and engineering fields "

    Not until one of those phony little fucks can manage to produce a paper explaining their "theories" and get it published in a legitimate scientific or engineering journal ... not some Muslim website in Pakistan.

    Ten years, and these dim little frauds can't manage one single paper.

    Not exactly an impressive record in science so far.

  • @vjt9 "think it was a missile that actually hit that day"

    So why were all the support columns in the Pentagon knocked inward, instead of blown OUTWARD, which is what happens in a missile strike?

    Or haven't you ever seen a missile strike?

  • @MsgtSpook Hey stupid fuck what about people that were killed on that plane your a pussy faggot and making all these assumptions why don't you say this shit to the families of the victims. My neighbor lost his son what ???did the government steal the plane and all the people. shitbag pussy!

  • @MegaJohnnywadd

    Anyone as rude as you is probably stupid enough to think that a 767 could hit the Pentagon, and there would be NO FOOTAGE I'm sorry for the life of your friend but your anger needs to be directed at the terrorist, they are the American secret services run by your masters

  • @happybdayo I apologize for my rudeness but would mind sucking my balls you fucking retard!!!!!

  • @MegaJohnnywadd

    Oh my dear god, it's retarded people like you who need to be shot in the back of the neck and kicked into a shallow grave.

    Please stop wasting valuable earthly resources and die. You sheep.

  • @merkabah2 Oh dear god.....HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!! but maybe you would suck on my balls just like all the other fucking idiots with their comments. If you want to I give you my name and address their tough and you bring that gun. I would like to see how far you get in using that gun you fucking piece of shit!!!

  • @vjt9 eh, on the pentagon yes because then the US could take Iraq, (one of the worlds largest oil producing countries).

  • @vjt9 Tell that to the 130+ eye witnesses. Only one of those witnesses failed to identify the object as a plane, and one got such a good look at it that he had to throw himself to the ground to avoid being decapitated by it.

  • @MrAwsome514 actually you're wrong,no one actually saw the plane hit they all had something distorting their view, they presumed it was the plane.there is a witness that saw the plane with his own eyes miss the pentagon after the explosion.what about that?my point is i could be right,you could be right but an unbias investigation is well overdue.the govt can shut all the conspiracy down just by showing video, why don't they? don't tell me that the highest secure place had no cameras that day.

  • @buffymtl LEt me guess... you got that info from a truther website right? Do you know how often those sites intentionally misquote eye witness accounts.

    Ofcourse the place had cameras... What you don't seem to understand is that security cameras are manufactured to be cheap so they can be bought in bulk to cover a large facility like this. They don't have the frame rate to catch a 400 mph plane at close range... On top of that the cameras were not exactly new...

  • @MrAwsome514 1st of all no he's not a "truther"........lol.....you are judging without even having seen the video. so funny. and i'm sorry but if you really believe your LAME excuse of "they bought in bulk; so they were cheap" you've got a screw loose. So you're telling me that the most important place in all of the states that holds top secrets has cheap video cameras 'cause they bought in bulk to save money?? watch the video and then comment...

  • @buffymtl "1st of all no he's not a "truther"" Why are you talking about yourself in the third person? Are you so stupid that you can't even figure out that my comment was directed at you?

    Security cameras have NEVER been up to par with the cameras used by news crews and we can see how poor quality even those where back then. And the cameras used by the news crews where fairly new at the time. Security cameras are often in place for over a decade so these where old and crappy.

  • @MrAwsome514 obviously you're an idiot who doesn't know how write-you wrote "you got that info from a truther website right?".hence my answer of the video's director is not a truther ..i thought i made it clear but obviously i need clue cards for you. keep believing your most ridiculous excuse about the cameras. YOu know it's because of ppl like you that are so bloody blind and naive that they get away with this type of shit. That's why US is in the shit they are in. STUPIDITY AND NAIVETY

  • @MrAwsome514 watch "national security alert".... one guy did the investigation and came up with alot of physical proof. with lots of witnesses interviewed, it's actually quite interesting and to me scary.

  • From CNN ,,I presume............Patonga,,Pa­tonga,,Patonga!!!

  • I mean, yet another film that magically fucks up right as the plane comes into view.

  • looks like a fighter jet though

  • @vjt9 Private Jet my friend. Close but not close enough =D

  • point is ..this is a no fly zone ..and 'a' plane films 'another' plane hitting the building ..and just then i guess the flight attendant got his bloddy mary, so he switched the camera off (?1)

  • @vjt9 Maybe it's a helicopter that is filming this. Like, the kind that are allowed to land on the helipad right over there next to the pentagon. I'm sure it would be authorized to fly, even on 9/11, because the pilots are probably highly trusted.

  • all i see is a white thing build up beside the pentagon.

  • A better fake then the pentagon could make you say? I could make a better fake then this! And I'd remember to include dust clouds, shadows, and light reflections from the explosion.

    This was either made by a troofer, or more likely someone who wants to wind troofers up.

  • if you look at the helicopter footage u can see that the blast (explosion) mooves for 2-3 frames along with the camera that shoot that footage. it isn`t stable.

    that is the true evidence that the second footage was faked too. look closeli frame bi frame at that second footage and you will see what i mean.

    when u film an explosion and in the middle of it u turn the camera away, the explosion doesn`t move along with the cam not even for 1 milisecond, but in this footage you can see the oposite

  • It looks fake as hell, the impact flash moves independently of the pentagon...

  • wrong angle for the jet? according to every thing I have seen. looks fake?

  • wow a white streak it dosent look big enough to be a plane.

  • good point.

  • This video is a fake, and a very bad one at that. The original video used to make this fake must have been shot well before 9/11, since it doesn't show the equipment yard next to the building, where the generator trailer was hit. Also, it was not shot at 9:37am, since the sun is coming from about due south. Why are you keeping this obvious fraud online, OutcastUNO? Nobody seems to be able to find this anywhere else, so are YOU the fraud who made it?

  • @typelouder Why is it satill online? Are you familiar with the term "batcrap crazy?"

  • whats this god awful audio fuck this shit fuck you

  • fake

  • that's not even the point of impact

  • @moultriegadog This vid may or may not be fake. Your observation however is incorrect.

  • Fake or not. I'm wrong! Grow up.

  • The only vidoes released to the media is the the main gate video of the Pent. All ther videos have been confiscated. All other pos VIDEOs you se are fake.

  • yea its fake just watch the trajectory change mid lawn and head 15 degrees right. the problem is that vid gov official.

  • Right at 17 seconds it looks like it just mooshes out and then no matching fireball that DID come out of the building

    from preplaced pyrotechnics (they were :renovating" right there) (easy to build stuff in for d day) The Lawsuit was just filed on the 28th against rummy and bush etc. ! Hey ONE honest lawyer !

    I would'nt fly on a plane with him !

  • I notice a white dot near the ground at the point where the flying thing will eventually hit. This is like the white dot on the North Tower that the plane is perhaps targeting.

  • dont really care if it's a joke...i want 42 seconds of my life back

  • yep, its a joke... hardee har har

  • dude, i think this is supposed to be a joke. Calm down folks.

  • This is so fake. Come on people. Look at that superimposed explosion.

    It's fake crap like this that fools people into looking like idiots down the road.

    Stick to the more real and provable evidence, not phony garbage like this.

  • lol

  • Looks more legit than the 25%/100% version. Definitely not a plane, but then we know that anyway from the witnesses.

  • Wrong, and you're a moron.

  • Video is legit, well now...THE GOVERNMENT IS ROGUE.

  • Video is not legit, what's wrong with you?

  • Let's edit and amend the post to: "If it's legit, well now...THE GOVERNMENTIS ROGUE."

    No one wants the Patriot act, we got it.

    No one wants soldiers in Iraq, we got it.

    No one wants a bail out, we got it.

    88 cameras with video at the Pentagon, we don't get it.

    Eyewitnesses point the direction closer to this video, don't you get it?

    The government is rogue. What's wrong with you.

    Wake up!

  • There's no, "If it's legit"...it's not. It's CGI, not real. Maybe something fishy happened on that day, maybe not, but it's fake footage. This is just silly.

  • "Maybe something fishy happened on that day,..." Ain't no "maybe" about the "fishy" things happening that day. The whole office story stinks like "fish."

    Reminds me of the blind guy that stumbles into a fish market and says "Hello Ladies!"

  • very well put!

  • Oh ho ho sooooo silly you and your paranoid fears!

  • really nice man.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more