After studying over 8000 reports of government-caused deaths, Rummel estimates that there have been 262 million victims of democide in the last century.
@SemiFlacid After studying over 8000 reports of government-caused deaths, Rummel estimates that there have been 262 million victims of democide in the last century.
@prosperomage wrote: "the engines very likely hit the ground and were torn off the wings"
No report indicates that engines were torn off. LOOK at the pictures of the "cleanup crew" walking in front of the building. There are no gouges in the ground or scorched earth anywhere in the line of flight that indicate that "engines hit the ground and were torn off." Why are you making things up now? I thought the "official" reports were everything you needed! Since NIST ignores the wings so can you?
How do you know what it should look like, are you a structural engineer? If so, go argue with the other engineers that said this is about right. Go argue with all of the people on the ground that SAW A BIG ASS JET HIT.
Your argument against all of the mounds of evidence is "it doesn't look right to me"
@Elthenar You wrote:"If so, go argue with the other engineers that said this is about right. Go argue with all of the people on the ground that SAW A BIG ASS JET HIT."
Typical sheeple rhetoric. Since you aren't a "structural engineer" you aren't allowed to think.
Do you have to be a doctor to know the difference between a hand and a foot? Neither do I need to be a "structural engineer" to know that a 757 has wings and BIG ASS JET ENGINES that should have at least made a freakin' mark.
@Elthenar After studying over 8000 reports of government-caused deaths, Rummel estimates that there have been 262 million victims of democide in the last century.
If no plane hit the Pentagon, where did Flight 77 actually go? Were the people who phoned loved ones from the hijacked plane in on it too? If they went to the trouble of hijacking the plane to dispose of it for the cover-up, why not just go ahead and fly the damn thing in to the Pentagon?
You conspiracy theorists suffer from very poor critical thinking.
@Elthenar If a plane did hit the Pentagon, why was is the hole smaller than the diameter of the plane's body and why are there no features consistent with what the wings of a jet would cause? Critical thinking causes a rational person to realize that the single hole was too small to have been caused by Flight 77. I don't have to know what caused the hole, but I do know that Flight 77 could not have done it. Those who believe that Flight 77 caused the damage are the conspiracy theorists.
@prosperomage You believe that the wings could NOT have destroyed reinforced concrete but the fuselage which is made of the same exact materials did destroy reinforced concrete. There isn't so much as a mark on the freakin' paint that indicates there were wings you idiot!
Sigh. The video is fake & has been known to be so for at least a year before you posted it. The aerial shots come from a DOD film and are available as stock footage. The 'missile' is CGI. Note how there is no smoke moving upward after 'impact' nor any damage to the inner rings.
Still doubtful? Compare the trees in the courtyard with those in a real aerial shot taken on 9-11: tinyurl . com /77b3ck4 (remove spaces, scroll down).
Also, work on your analysis skills since it's an obvious fake.
@Huntington12345678 enjoy hitting puberty when you get there, and the tin foil hat thing was a bit corny, you a sheep like the rest of them haha you're the governments bitch, you're obamas hooker
around the 20 second mark u can see the explosion move with the camera. Dude take this garbage off the internet. Its people like u that make it easier for the goverment and others to shrug off the questions we are asking and the answers we demand.
The pentagon was hit by a middle that's a fact but this video is fake in my opinion bc in all the other videos of the pentagon theres an big fire ball and this simulation only shows the impact whole on fire with no smoke or fire ball
cant beleive in 2011 retards still think a plane hit the pentagon!! AND evidence PROVES NO plane hit pentagon, no plane crashed into a feild and the twin towers were rigged by the US gov themselves. deal with it.
its not a plane the goverment want you to think it is god dam brainwashed dumbasses its a god dam missile look at the fucking thing or go to specsavers the goverment wants to control you hmm let me add that up Goverment+Dumbfucks+Brainwashed Dumbfucks= Retarded RetardedDumbBrainWashedFucks there thats settled nicely
It was missile painted to look just like a plane and they know it. There are pictures of it out there. Just go to my channel. second video on my favorites. Hell with it here it is. Watch all the way threw tell me what you think of this one? GIadv36dcjU. I do believe we have nail these bastards. Thanks for viewing. It's the only one like it out there.
@zenoist2 they can't release the evidence dipshit...you need to read up on the chain of evidence procedures with regard to criminal cases (which is what the videos are, evidence of a crime). They can not be released until the justice department has completed all of the prosecutions pertaining to the event, and since the main suspect continues to elude...you're more than likely not to see them until he's caught or killed.
@Oz1976 "which is what the videos are, evidence of a crime"
There are NO other videos to release, period. The FBI list makes this perfectly clear, but the lame little Truthies keep making up stories about other videotapes. It's nonsense.
i think Americans need to start a Public Interest Litigation suit ..demanding to release some of the tens of videos confiscated from all around the vicinity.
Clearly a fake. The south side of the building should have a second and third corridor pedestrian bridge/ landing for access by pedestrians to the second floor entrances for those corridors. The first was completed in 1999 therefore these aerial views predate 1999.
@vjt9 if it was a missle it wud have caused more damage and it wud not explode on contact, and even if it was a missile the pentagon wud have anti missile defenses and wud have stopped it
@leftysergeant : i think i agree with you bro ..a military fighter jet ..it was then (that could probably also explain the crazy maneuvers before impact, which were pretty much impossible for a 757)
@Chuggers456 : ..an anti-air-strike defense system would also take an aircraft out :)
@vjt9 no a fucking plane hit it...people need to do more than just read/watch the god damned conspiracy theories. Especially when they're presented by people with no fucking status in the field they're trying to argue their points from. (debunking911 . com)
@Oz1976 So what about architects and engineers for 911 truth? Over 200 architects and engineers, producing concrete evidence that buildings 1, 2 and 7 were brought down by explosives in a controlled demolition. I guess they don't have any status in the architectural and engineering fields then? Oh wait...
@SamAG99 You mean the ones that are making money off of all this, they have a fucking STORE link on their website. They site NOTHING new on their page. Everything they site as "evidence" has been said by truthers since the beginning...and the main thing they site that proves them wrong...PYROCLASTIC FLOWS. BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. They say they have 1500 "verified architectural / structural professionals"...yet only 64 people donated in their latest fundraiser, Richard Gage is a nut job.
@Oz1976 I know they didn't come up with it all, they simply produce the evidence well, without speculation or guesses, simply stating the evidence. You're a nut job?
I CAN DEBUNK THE ENTRIE 911 DOUFUS MOVEMENT WITH JUST ONE QUESTION:
Since the govt. committed 9/11, why arent truthers demanding the release of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed who is on trial for his life for a crime truthers claim he did not commit?
@Oz1976 /watch?v=5d5iIoCiI8g&feature=channel_video_title We have no evidence? suck on that fat cock...
and when your done with that maybe you can tongue these nuts over here /watch?v=8YaFGSPErKU ........
Annnd when your all cleaned up from that, why dont you go ahead and give a nice reach around to this one.. /watch?v=IO1ps1mzU8o ... BLIDAAAOOOWWW NIGGA
@Oz1976 Not sure if you realise this, but that link proves absolutely nothing. It's not even dealing with evidence, just basically telling you you're wrong. They kept the Manhattan project pretty nicely hidden, remember? ;)
@SamAG99 "Over 200 architects and engineers ... I guess they don't have any status in the architectural and engineering fields "
Not until one of those phony little fucks can manage to produce a paper explaining their "theories" and get it published in a legitimate scientific or engineering journal ... not some Muslim website in Pakistan.
Ten years, and these dim little frauds can't manage one single paper.
Not exactly an impressive record in science so far.
@MsgtSpook Hey stupid fuck what about people that were killed on that plane your a pussy faggot and making all these assumptions why don't you say this shit to the families of the victims. My neighbor lost his son what ???did the government steal the plane and all the people. shitbag pussy!
Anyone as rude as you is probably stupid enough to think that a 767 could hit the Pentagon, and there would be NO FOOTAGE I'm sorry for the life of your friend but your anger needs to be directed at the terrorist, they are the American secret services run by your masters
@merkabah2 Oh dear god.....HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!! but maybe you would suck on my balls just like all the other fucking idiots with their comments. If you want to I give you my name and address their tough and you bring that gun. I would like to see how far you get in using that gun you fucking piece of shit!!!
@vjt9 Tell that to the 130+ eye witnesses. Only one of those witnesses failed to identify the object as a plane, and one got such a good look at it that he had to throw himself to the ground to avoid being decapitated by it.
@MrAwsome514 actually you're wrong,no one actually saw the plane hit they all had something distorting their view, they presumed it was the plane.there is a witness that saw the plane with his own eyes miss the pentagon after the explosion.what about that?my point is i could be right,you could be right but an unbias investigation is well overdue.the govt can shut all the conspiracy down just by showing video, why don't they? don't tell me that the highest secure place had no cameras that day.
@buffymtl LEt me guess... you got that info from a truther website right? Do you know how often those sites intentionally misquote eye witness accounts.
Ofcourse the place had cameras... What you don't seem to understand is that security cameras are manufactured to be cheap so they can be bought in bulk to cover a large facility like this. They don't have the frame rate to catch a 400 mph plane at close range... On top of that the cameras were not exactly new...
@MrAwsome514 1st of all no he's not a "truther"........lol.....you are judging without even having seen the video. so funny. and i'm sorry but if you really believe your LAME excuse of "they bought in bulk; so they were cheap" you've got a screw loose. So you're telling me that the most important place in all of the states that holds top secrets has cheap video cameras 'cause they bought in bulk to save money?? watch the video and then comment...
@buffymtl "1st of all no he's not a "truther"" Why are you talking about yourself in the third person? Are you so stupid that you can't even figure out that my comment was directed at you?
Security cameras have NEVER been up to par with the cameras used by news crews and we can see how poor quality even those where back then. And the cameras used by the news crews where fairly new at the time. Security cameras are often in place for over a decade so these where old and crappy.
@MrAwsome514 obviously you're an idiot who doesn't know how write-you wrote "you got that info from a truther website right?".hence my answer of the video's director is not a truther ..i thought i made it clear but obviously i need clue cards for you. keep believing your most ridiculous excuse about the cameras. YOu know it's because of ppl like you that are so bloody blind and naive that they get away with this type of shit. That's why US is in the shit they are in. STUPIDITY AND NAIVETY
@buffymtl again... you assume I was reffering to that video. I was reffering to the other shit you have been spewing. You know... the bit about the cameras. My god you people are fucking retarded
@MrAwsome514 watch "national security alert".... one guy did the investigation and came up with alot of physical proof. with lots of witnesses interviewed, it's actually quite interesting and to me scary.
point is ..this is a no fly zone ..and 'a' plane films 'another' plane hitting the building ..and just then i guess the flight attendant got his bloddy mary, so he switched the camera off (?1)
@vjt9 Maybe it's a helicopter that is filming this. Like, the kind that are allowed to land on the helipad right over there next to the pentagon. I'm sure it would be authorized to fly, even on 9/11, because the pilots are probably highly trusted.
A better fake then the pentagon could make you say? I could make a better fake then this! And I'd remember to include dust clouds, shadows, and light reflections from the explosion.
This was either made by a troofer, or more likely someone who wants to wind troofers up.
if you look at the helicopter footage u can see that the blast (explosion) mooves for 2-3 frames along with the camera that shoot that footage. it isn`t stable.
that is the true evidence that the second footage was faked too. look closeli frame bi frame at that second footage and you will see what i mean.
when u film an explosion and in the middle of it u turn the camera away, the explosion doesn`t move along with the cam not even for 1 milisecond, but in this footage you can see the oposite
This video is a fake, and a very bad one at that. The original video used to make this fake must have been shot well before 9/11, since it doesn't show the equipment yard next to the building, where the generator trailer was hit. Also, it was not shot at 9:37am, since the sun is coming from about due south. Why are you keeping this obvious fraud online, OutcastUNO? Nobody seems to be able to find this anywhere else, so are YOU the fraud who made it?
The only vidoes released to the media is the the main gate video of the Pent. All ther videos have been confiscated. All other pos VIDEOs you se are fake.
Right at 17 seconds it looks like it just mooshes out and then no matching fireball that DID come out of the building
from preplaced pyrotechnics (they were :renovating" right there) (easy to build stuff in for d day) The Lawsuit was just filed on the 28th against rummy and bush etc. ! Hey ONE honest lawyer !
I notice a white dot near the ground at the point where the flying thing will eventually hit. This is like the white dot on the North Tower that the plane is perhaps targeting.
There's no, "If it's legit"...it's not. It's CGI, not real. Maybe something fishy happened on that day, maybe not, but it's fake footage. This is just silly.
"Maybe something fishy happened on that day,..." Ain't no "maybe" about the "fishy" things happening that day. The whole office story stinks like "fish."
Reminds me of the blind guy that stumbles into a fish market and says "Hello Ladies!"
This has been flagged as spam show
After studying over 8000 reports of government-caused deaths, Rummel estimates that there have been 262 million victims of democide in the last century.
krfuffle 1 hour ago
I didnt see a god damn thing!!
SemiFlacid 1 month ago
@SemiFlacid After studying over 8000 reports of government-caused deaths, Rummel estimates that there have been 262 million victims of democide in the last century.
So Why damn God?
krfuffle 1 hour ago
nice missle....
imwatchuvideo 1 month ago
@prosperomage wrote: "the engines very likely hit the ground and were torn off the wings"
No report indicates that engines were torn off. LOOK at the pictures of the "cleanup crew" walking in front of the building. There are no gouges in the ground or scorched earth anywhere in the line of flight that indicate that "engines hit the ground and were torn off." Why are you making things up now? I thought the "official" reports were everything you needed! Since NIST ignores the wings so can you?
MrIHADANACCOUNT 2 months ago
How do you know what it should look like, are you a structural engineer? If so, go argue with the other engineers that said this is about right. Go argue with all of the people on the ground that SAW A BIG ASS JET HIT.
Your argument against all of the mounds of evidence is "it doesn't look right to me"
Elthenar 2 months ago
@Elthenar You wrote:"If so, go argue with the other engineers that said this is about right. Go argue with all of the people on the ground that SAW A BIG ASS JET HIT."
Typical sheeple rhetoric. Since you aren't a "structural engineer" you aren't allowed to think.
Do you have to be a doctor to know the difference between a hand and a foot? Neither do I need to be a "structural engineer" to know that a 757 has wings and BIG ASS JET ENGINES that should have at least made a freakin' mark.
MrIHADANACCOUNT 2 months ago
@MrIHADANACCOUNT I am "sheeple" because I don't believe your theory over numerous eye witnesses that saw a huge jet?
Yes you, the random idiot on youtube, are better versed in what happened than the people who were actually there and say what happened.
Elthenar 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Elthenar After studying over 8000 reports of government-caused deaths, Rummel estimates that there have been 262 million victims of democide in the last century.
krfuffle 1 hour ago
If no plane hit the Pentagon, where did Flight 77 actually go? Were the people who phoned loved ones from the hijacked plane in on it too? If they went to the trouble of hijacking the plane to dispose of it for the cover-up, why not just go ahead and fly the damn thing in to the Pentagon?
You conspiracy theorists suffer from very poor critical thinking.
Elthenar 2 months ago
@Elthenar If a plane did hit the Pentagon, why was is the hole smaller than the diameter of the plane's body and why are there no features consistent with what the wings of a jet would cause? Critical thinking causes a rational person to realize that the single hole was too small to have been caused by Flight 77. I don't have to know what caused the hole, but I do know that Flight 77 could not have done it. Those who believe that Flight 77 caused the damage are the conspiracy theorists.
MrIHADANACCOUNT 2 months ago
@MrIHADANACCOUNT -- There are no "missiles" as big as the thing in this video.
The hole in the wall IS consistent with the size of a 757 fuselage.
And why would the wings destroy reinforced concrete?
prosperomage 2 months ago
@prosperomage You believe that the wings could NOT have destroyed reinforced concrete but the fuselage which is made of the same exact materials did destroy reinforced concrete. There isn't so much as a mark on the freakin' paint that indicates there were wings you idiot!
MrIHADANACCOUNT 2 months ago
@MrIHADANACCOUNT -- It's interesting how some people only answer the part that is convenient for them.
There are no "missiles" as big as the object in this video.
As low as the thing was when it hit, the engines very likely hit the ground and were torn off the wings.
And if you don't know that there is a lot less mass in a wing than in a fuselage, then you probably have never seen a real airplane.
prosperomage 2 months ago
@prosperomage
HT TP : / / Citizen Investigation Team . com
2Truth4Liberty 1 week ago
Fukin total shite
goonluv 2 months ago
Sigh. The video is fake & has been known to be so for at least a year before you posted it. The aerial shots come from a DOD film and are available as stock footage. The 'missile' is CGI. Note how there is no smoke moving upward after 'impact' nor any damage to the inner rings.
Still doubtful? Compare the trees in the courtyard with those in a real aerial shot taken on 9-11: tinyurl . com /77b3ck4 (remove spaces, scroll down).
Also, work on your analysis skills since it's an obvious fake.
Doodle1Bean 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Paranoid idiot conspiracy theorists man... itwastyped. com check out the conspiracy tab and you may just make it back to the real world!
culturebully3 3 months ago
pathetic
kb2622 3 months ago
get a life man !
Singh778 3 months ago
where's the big fireball and smoke when it hits?
AaronAirstrike 4 months ago
Come on. Fess up...... You screwballs that say a missile hit the Pentagon... Admit you're wearing a tin foil hat, right now. hahahaha
Huntington12345678 4 months ago
This is a fake- the aerial footage seen doctored here was not shot on 9/11/2001
MrHarperman16 4 months ago
All the people who said they watched a plane go into the Pentagon... were they all in on the conspiracy, too? (rolls eyes)
Huntington12345678 4 months ago
@Huntington12345678 its very possible, yeah
SERGEda3RD 4 months ago
@SERGEda3RD ... It's very not. Enjoy your tin foil hat, nutjob. hahaha
Huntington12345678 4 months ago
@Huntington12345678 enjoy hitting puberty when you get there, and the tin foil hat thing was a bit corny, you a sheep like the rest of them haha you're the governments bitch, you're obamas hooker
SERGEda3RD 4 months ago
@SERGEda3RD ... hahaha! Do you have any pictures of the Loch Ness Monster, that lives in your pool?
Huntington12345678 3 months ago 2
Comment removed
Huntington12345678 4 months ago
around the 20 second mark u can see the explosion move with the camera. Dude take this garbage off the internet. Its people like u that make it easier for the goverment and others to shrug off the questions we are asking and the answers we demand.
biiggExx 4 months ago
go to hell
ColGregoryUNSC 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fallen Towers, a new song composed this week to mark the 10th anniversary of 9/11. Type in the three w's and then post and copy this link :-
youtube.com/watch?v=4vaYTondRjE
alwaystheway 4 months ago
Google "35mm Stock Footage of Washington DC aerials"
kbspapa 4 months ago
The pentagon was hit by a middle that's a fact but this video is fake in my opinion bc in all the other videos of the pentagon theres an big fire ball and this simulation only shows the impact whole on fire with no smoke or fire ball
showershoo 4 months ago
Truth hurts dont it for the ppl who think that terrorist from caves! Who some are still alive lol cause the usa security to shut down the whole day
shaneclone15 5 months ago
cant beleive in 2011 retards still think a plane hit the pentagon!! AND evidence PROVES NO plane hit pentagon, no plane crashed into a feild and the twin towers were rigged by the US gov themselves. deal with it.
bjm351 5 months ago
@bjm351
DUDE I HATE YOU! THERE WERE PLANES THAT HIT THEM!
traumacenterguilt 5 months ago
@traumacenterguilt lol! =D you just hate that im right!!
bjm351 5 months ago
@bjm351 Those towers were rigged by liberals and truthers.
LT1HILLINGHOE 5 months ago
Who cares if it's real or not, a frickin' plane crashed into the Pentagon.
datboysha40 6 months ago
@datboysha40 agreed it was a plane, evidence proves it ^-^
TheCottonxCandy 5 months ago
Looks much more real than Barry´s birth certificate.
sinclair61 7 months ago
its not a plane the goverment want you to think it is god dam brainwashed dumbasses its a god dam missile look at the fucking thing or go to specsavers the goverment wants to control you hmm let me add that up Goverment+Dumbfucks+Brainwashed Dumbfucks= Retarded RetardedDumbBrainWashedFucks there thats settled nicely
Rawmonger 7 months ago
It was missile painted to look just like a plane and they know it. There are pictures of it out there. Just go to my channel. second video on my favorites. Hell with it here it is. Watch all the way threw tell me what you think of this one? GIadv36dcjU. I do believe we have nail these bastards. Thanks for viewing. It's the only one like it out there.
cyberage100 8 months ago
scud
tgballin24 10 months ago
LMFAO, it came from the opposite angle
praetorian2150 10 months ago
They might want to start this fake video of a something?hitting the building at the right angle! This thing ain't
dobberdoss 1 year ago
Those 80 odd videos will probably never be released.
You can bet your life not a single one of them shows the stated plane.
Why did the FBI go around to gas stations and hotels seizing footage when they have plenty of evidence from the pentagon cameras?
Why dont they kill the conspiracy dead by releasing evidence?
zenoist2 1 year ago
@zenoist2 they can't release the evidence dipshit...you need to read up on the chain of evidence procedures with regard to criminal cases (which is what the videos are, evidence of a crime). They can not be released until the justice department has completed all of the prosecutions pertaining to the event, and since the main suspect continues to elude...you're more than likely not to see them until he's caught or killed.
Oz1976 11 months ago
@Oz1976 would that be osama? Go and look at the FBI page where he has nothing at all to do with 9/11.
Severe lack of evidence.
Hes very conveniently missing.
He pops up in countries the USA wants to invade now and then as the perfect excuse.
He also died years ago.
zenoist2 11 months ago
@Oz1976 "which is what the videos are, evidence of a crime"
There are NO other videos to release, period. The FBI list makes this perfectly clear, but the lame little Truthies keep making up stories about other videotapes. It's nonsense.
MsgtSpook 10 months ago
i think Americans need to start a Public Interest Litigation suit ..demanding to release some of the tens of videos confiscated from all around the vicinity.
anyone agree?
vjt9 1 year ago 11
its soooo fake omg ur dumb as shit, and no missle hit it!
iAirsoft69 1 year ago
Clearly a fake. The south side of the building should have a second and third corridor pedestrian bridge/ landing for access by pedestrians to the second floor entrances for those corridors. The first was completed in 1999 therefore these aerial views predate 1999.
hunterliggett 1 year ago
Looks to me like this thing hits at a different angle than the surveillence video.
xXTurdSandwitchXx 1 year ago
just my opinion: doubt this video is real ..but think it was a missile that actually hit that day
vjt9 1 year ago 23
@vjt9 if it was a missle it wud have caused more damage and it wud not explode on contact, and even if it was a missile the pentagon wud have anti missile defenses and wud have stopped it
Chuggers456 1 year ago
@vjt9 No missile capable of flying in like that would be capable of carrying that much jet fuel.
(Just my professional opinion as a veteran military fire fighter.)
leftysergeant 1 year ago
@leftysergeant : i think i agree with you bro ..a military fighter jet ..it was then (that could probably also explain the crazy maneuvers before impact, which were pretty much impossible for a 757)
@Chuggers456 : ..an anti-air-strike defense system would also take an aircraft out :)
vjt9 1 year ago
@vjt9 no a fucking plane hit it...people need to do more than just read/watch the god damned conspiracy theories. Especially when they're presented by people with no fucking status in the field they're trying to argue their points from. (debunking911 . com)
Oz1976 11 months ago
@Oz1976 So what about architects and engineers for 911 truth? Over 200 architects and engineers, producing concrete evidence that buildings 1, 2 and 7 were brought down by explosives in a controlled demolition. I guess they don't have any status in the architectural and engineering fields then? Oh wait...
SamAG99 10 months ago
@SamAG99 You mean the ones that are making money off of all this, they have a fucking STORE link on their website. They site NOTHING new on their page. Everything they site as "evidence" has been said by truthers since the beginning...and the main thing they site that proves them wrong...PYROCLASTIC FLOWS. BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. They say they have 1500 "verified architectural / structural professionals"...yet only 64 people donated in their latest fundraiser, Richard Gage is a nut job.
Oz1976 10 months ago
@Oz1976 I know they didn't come up with it all, they simply produce the evidence well, without speculation or guesses, simply stating the evidence. You're a nut job?
SamAG99 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SamAG99
I CAN DEBUNK THE ENTRIE 911 DOUFUS MOVEMENT WITH JUST ONE QUESTION:
Since the govt. committed 9/11, why arent truthers demanding the release of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed who is on trial for his life for a crime truthers claim he did not commit?
911 TRUTH = 911 LIES
ctcole77 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Oz1976 /watch?v=5d5iIoCiI8g&feature=channel_video_title We have no evidence? suck on that fat cock...
and when your done with that maybe you can tongue these nuts over here /watch?v=8YaFGSPErKU ........
Annnd when your all cleaned up from that, why dont you go ahead and give a nice reach around to this one.. /watch?v=IO1ps1mzU8o ... BLIDAAAOOOWWW NIGGA
Edog722 10 months ago
@SamAG99 globalbrief . ca/tomquiggin/2010/05/01/911-conspiracy-theories-%E2%80%93-debunking-richard-gage/
Oz1976 10 months ago
@Oz1976 Not sure if you realise this, but that link proves absolutely nothing. It's not even dealing with evidence, just basically telling you you're wrong. They kept the Manhattan project pretty nicely hidden, remember? ;)
SamAG99 10 months ago
@SamAG99 "Over 200 architects and engineers ... I guess they don't have any status in the architectural and engineering fields "
Not until one of those phony little fucks can manage to produce a paper explaining their "theories" and get it published in a legitimate scientific or engineering journal ... not some Muslim website in Pakistan.
Ten years, and these dim little frauds can't manage one single paper.
Not exactly an impressive record in science so far.
MsgtSpook 10 months ago
@vjt9 "think it was a missile that actually hit that day"
So why were all the support columns in the Pentagon knocked inward, instead of blown OUTWARD, which is what happens in a missile strike?
Or haven't you ever seen a missile strike?
MsgtSpook 10 months ago
@MsgtSpook Hey stupid fuck what about people that were killed on that plane your a pussy faggot and making all these assumptions why don't you say this shit to the families of the victims. My neighbor lost his son what ???did the government steal the plane and all the people. shitbag pussy!
MegaJohnnywadd 9 months ago
@MegaJohnnywadd
Anyone as rude as you is probably stupid enough to think that a 767 could hit the Pentagon, and there would be NO FOOTAGE I'm sorry for the life of your friend but your anger needs to be directed at the terrorist, they are the American secret services run by your masters
happybdayo 9 months ago
@happybdayo I apologize for my rudeness but would mind sucking my balls you fucking retard!!!!!
MegaJohnnywadd 8 months ago
@MegaJohnnywadd
Oh my dear god, it's retarded people like you who need to be shot in the back of the neck and kicked into a shallow grave.
Please stop wasting valuable earthly resources and die. You sheep.
merkabah2 8 months ago
@merkabah2 Oh dear god.....HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!! but maybe you would suck on my balls just like all the other fucking idiots with their comments. If you want to I give you my name and address their tough and you bring that gun. I would like to see how far you get in using that gun you fucking piece of shit!!!
MegaJohnnywadd 8 months ago
@vjt9 eh, on the pentagon yes because then the US could take Iraq, (one of the worlds largest oil producing countries).
MakeMeNick1203 9 months ago
@vjt9 Tell that to the 130+ eye witnesses. Only one of those witnesses failed to identify the object as a plane, and one got such a good look at it that he had to throw himself to the ground to avoid being decapitated by it.
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 actually you're wrong,no one actually saw the plane hit they all had something distorting their view, they presumed it was the plane.there is a witness that saw the plane with his own eyes miss the pentagon after the explosion.what about that?my point is i could be right,you could be right but an unbias investigation is well overdue.the govt can shut all the conspiracy down just by showing video, why don't they? don't tell me that the highest secure place had no cameras that day.
buffymtl 2 months ago
@buffymtl LEt me guess... you got that info from a truther website right? Do you know how often those sites intentionally misquote eye witness accounts.
Ofcourse the place had cameras... What you don't seem to understand is that security cameras are manufactured to be cheap so they can be bought in bulk to cover a large facility like this. They don't have the frame rate to catch a 400 mph plane at close range... On top of that the cameras were not exactly new...
MrAwsome514 2 months ago
@MrAwsome514 1st of all no he's not a "truther"........lol.....you are judging without even having seen the video. so funny. and i'm sorry but if you really believe your LAME excuse of "they bought in bulk; so they were cheap" you've got a screw loose. So you're telling me that the most important place in all of the states that holds top secrets has cheap video cameras 'cause they bought in bulk to save money?? watch the video and then comment...
buffymtl 2 months ago
@buffymtl "1st of all no he's not a "truther"" Why are you talking about yourself in the third person? Are you so stupid that you can't even figure out that my comment was directed at you?
Security cameras have NEVER been up to par with the cameras used by news crews and we can see how poor quality even those where back then. And the cameras used by the news crews where fairly new at the time. Security cameras are often in place for over a decade so these where old and crappy.
MrAwsome514 2 months ago
@MrAwsome514 obviously you're an idiot who doesn't know how write-you wrote "you got that info from a truther website right?".hence my answer of the video's director is not a truther ..i thought i made it clear but obviously i need clue cards for you. keep believing your most ridiculous excuse about the cameras. YOu know it's because of ppl like you that are so bloody blind and naive that they get away with this type of shit. That's why US is in the shit they are in. STUPIDITY AND NAIVETY
buffymtl 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@buffymtl again... you assume I was reffering to that video. I was reffering to the other shit you have been spewing. You know... the bit about the cameras. My god you people are fucking retarded
MrAwsome514 2 months ago
@MrAwsome514 watch "national security alert".... one guy did the investigation and came up with alot of physical proof. with lots of witnesses interviewed, it's actually quite interesting and to me scary.
buffymtl 2 months ago
From CNN ,,I presume............Patonga,,Patonga,,Patonga!!!
bulltexan1 1 year ago
I mean, yet another film that magically fucks up right as the plane comes into view.
THEmattyj162 1 year ago
looks like a fighter jet though
vjt9 1 year ago
@vjt9 Private Jet my friend. Close but not close enough =D
Saulscmit 1 year ago
point is ..this is a no fly zone ..and 'a' plane films 'another' plane hitting the building ..and just then i guess the flight attendant got his bloddy mary, so he switched the camera off (?1)
vjt9 1 year ago
@vjt9 Maybe it's a helicopter that is filming this. Like, the kind that are allowed to land on the helipad right over there next to the pentagon. I'm sure it would be authorized to fly, even on 9/11, because the pilots are probably highly trusted.
TheHURiKANE35 1 year ago
all i see is a white thing build up beside the pentagon.
canihave2bucks 1 year ago
A better fake then the pentagon could make you say? I could make a better fake then this! And I'd remember to include dust clouds, shadows, and light reflections from the explosion.
This was either made by a troofer, or more likely someone who wants to wind troofers up.
Feyd01 1 year ago
if you look at the helicopter footage u can see that the blast (explosion) mooves for 2-3 frames along with the camera that shoot that footage. it isn`t stable.
that is the true evidence that the second footage was faked too. look closeli frame bi frame at that second footage and you will see what i mean.
when u film an explosion and in the middle of it u turn the camera away, the explosion doesn`t move along with the cam not even for 1 milisecond, but in this footage you can see the oposite
darzuadrian 1 year ago
It looks fake as hell, the impact flash moves independently of the pentagon...
PsychoSpammer 1 year ago
wrong angle for the jet? according to every thing I have seen. looks fake?
SPAGHETTIMONSTER1 1 year ago
wow a white streak it dosent look big enough to be a plane.
bmit989 1 year ago
good point.
omegassault 1 year ago
This video is a fake, and a very bad one at that. The original video used to make this fake must have been shot well before 9/11, since it doesn't show the equipment yard next to the building, where the generator trailer was hit. Also, it was not shot at 9:37am, since the sun is coming from about due south. Why are you keeping this obvious fraud online, OutcastUNO? Nobody seems to be able to find this anywhere else, so are YOU the fraud who made it?
typelouder 1 year ago 37
@typelouder Why is it satill online? Are you familiar with the term "batcrap crazy?"
leftysergeant 1 year ago
whats this god awful audio fuck this shit fuck you
pippigladstone 2 years ago
fake
kokpit 2 years ago
that's not even the point of impact
moultriegadog 2 years ago
@moultriegadog This vid may or may not be fake. Your observation however is incorrect.
0100OO 1 year ago
Fake or not. I'm wrong! Grow up.
moultriegadog 1 year ago
The only vidoes released to the media is the the main gate video of the Pent. All ther videos have been confiscated. All other pos VIDEOs you se are fake.
justmeppl 2 years ago
yea its fake just watch the trajectory change mid lawn and head 15 degrees right. the problem is that vid gov official.
itachiyates 2 years ago
Right at 17 seconds it looks like it just mooshes out and then no matching fireball that DID come out of the building
from preplaced pyrotechnics (they were :renovating" right there) (easy to build stuff in for d day) The Lawsuit was just filed on the 28th against rummy and bush etc. ! Hey ONE honest lawyer !
I would'nt fly on a plane with him !
SAYYOURROSARY 3 years ago
I notice a white dot near the ground at the point where the flying thing will eventually hit. This is like the white dot on the North Tower that the plane is perhaps targeting.
dlaliberte 3 years ago
dont really care if it's a joke...i want 42 seconds of my life back
gotaluvUSA 3 years ago
yep, its a joke... hardee har har
xaxaas4 3 years ago
dude, i think this is supposed to be a joke. Calm down folks.
yootubematt 3 years ago
This is so fake. Come on people. Look at that superimposed explosion.
It's fake crap like this that fools people into looking like idiots down the road.
Stick to the more real and provable evidence, not phony garbage like this.
Circumvenscion 3 years ago
lol
klunk64 3 years ago
Looks more legit than the 25%/100% version. Definitely not a plane, but then we know that anyway from the witnesses.
crazymoo56 3 years ago
Wrong, and you're a moron.
Miko5000 3 years ago
Video is legit, well now...THE GOVERNMENT IS ROGUE.
beijingyank 3 years ago
Video is not legit, what's wrong with you?
Miko5000 3 years ago
Let's edit and amend the post to: "If it's legit, well now...THE GOVERNMENTIS ROGUE."
No one wants the Patriot act, we got it.
No one wants soldiers in Iraq, we got it.
No one wants a bail out, we got it.
88 cameras with video at the Pentagon, we don't get it.
Eyewitnesses point the direction closer to this video, don't you get it?
The government is rogue. What's wrong with you.
Wake up!
beijingyank 3 years ago 2
There's no, "If it's legit"...it's not. It's CGI, not real. Maybe something fishy happened on that day, maybe not, but it's fake footage. This is just silly.
Miko5000 3 years ago
"Maybe something fishy happened on that day,..." Ain't no "maybe" about the "fishy" things happening that day. The whole office story stinks like "fish."
Reminds me of the blind guy that stumbles into a fish market and says "Hello Ladies!"
beijingyank 3 years ago
very well put!
ericgrimm22 2 years ago
Oh ho ho sooooo silly you and your paranoid fears!
bryanjohnbeard 2 years ago
really nice man.
wayward2310 3 years ago