The Francis Crick quote at the beginning is spot on. Biological organisms, even microbes, are so immensely complex and intricately ordered that we have to remind ourselves that these are evolved and evolving beings. If you forget this fact, you'll jump to incorrect conclusions and make poor hypotheses because your theoretical framework is not aligned with what is demonstrably true in biology.
If something is so complex that it must require a designer (which I understand is the basic tenet of ID), and the example of, say, DNA is used to make the point, then there must also exist something so simple that it DOESN`T require a designer. If there isn`t such simplicity, then the word complex has no meaning, because everything then is complex, and therefore everything requires a designer. It`s circular.
So, challenge: Give an example of such simplicity.
"Evolution artificially rules out intelligence before the evidence has a chance to speak." What evidence? Intelligence design has had plenty of time to provide evidence but never does. It had 9 minutes and 27 seconds to do so, and it didn't. UFOlogists could do better than this.
society can never make the standards for what is right an wrong.all people make mistakes an commit evil acts.there is not person that ever lived that did not do wrong.thats why the evidence is clear that someone who never commited evil an knows all about it set the standard.an jesus said to the leading authorities .which one of you can convict me of sin.they did not answer.god sets the standards of real morality.
@MrBeefreetwo If that were true, then what is considered to be moral would never change and would be the same for all societies (neither of which is true). Heck, members of the same religion don't even agree on what is moral (as is evidenced by there being so many different denominations).
now no one can know that god exists,but no one can know that he doesnt exist.but after many years of studying all of the so called religions,the evidence for the christian god of the bible has a preponderance of evidence an the archeological findings in every case proves much an not in one dig has it ever been contrary to what the bible said.ive been anagnostic in my early years but like i said chritianity gives the best evidence im my humble opinion of mans origins an what makes him tick.
@MrBeefreetwo Archeologists finding a place mentioned in the bible does not prove that the stories they are mentioned in are true (you have to look no further than modern authors like John Grisham for proof of that).
@ArcanaKnight I wanted to "like" this comment, but cannot...we all know why. I'd like to do a statistical analysis of YT videos with ratings and/or comments disabled and see how many of them are creationist videos. I think we all know the answer.
then where did it all come from and who sets the standard of what is good an what is evil or bad.why is there something rather than nothing.to say god dont exist makes you quite dumb.
@MrBeefreetwo "who sets the standard of what is good and what is evil" Society does. That much is evidenced by the fact that morality changes over time and across societal borders.
"why is there something rather than nothing" Why not? Why expect nothing rather than something? In fact, statistics has been used to show that "something" is far more likely than nothing. tinyurlDOTcom/8y2wca3
HAHA! Laughable! They say the complexity of the bacteria is so unexplainable, that they must of been "created". HAHA! That is just an easy way out and a quick answer to something that cannot be explained by ignorant creationists (all of them ignorant). Life didn't need intelligence behind it to begin. Just because we use our intelligence to create things, doesn't give anyone the right to assume that therefore an intelligence must of created life. Get over it and move on, God does not exist FACT
If something is so complex that it must require a designer (which I understand is the basic tenet of ID), and the example of, say, DNA is used to make the point, then there must also exist something so simple that it DOESN`T require a designer. If there isn`t such simplicity, then the word complex has no meaning, because everything then is complex, and therefore everything requires a designer. It`s circular.
So, challenge: Give an example of such simplicity.
They became disbelievers, and because of a *deficiency* of their *knowledge* and *puerility* of *intellect*, began quibbling inimically with Truth, so much so that they *denied* creativeness and claimed that all this *universe* was *meaningless* and vain, without any *ingenious* design on the part of a Designer or Creator *God* - a purposeless non-entity *without* balance or poise.
"........deaf, dumb (and) blind, so they do not understand. "
So much science for this stupid brainless pseudo-Scientific Demagogue!
How can you delude yourself and believe that hydrogen and oxygen, electrons and protons, should first produce themselves, then be the source for all other beings, and finally decree the laws that regulate themselves and the rest of the material world?
The chain of causality cannot recede into infinity!
Stupid brainless cuckoo atheist with asinine mind!
I have already posted the definitions of theory..facts are proven, this is why it is called a fact...theory is not..thus it is a theory..speculation get over it..
@UNDERDOGTAHOE You're laboring under a massive misconception of basic scientific concepts. A scientific theory never graduates into becoming a fact once its been proven enough or enough supporting evidence is found; a theory will always be a theory. Facts and theories have different uses in science; that is why there is a fact of gravity and a theory of gravity. Facts just describe whereas theories explain; that's why science values theories more highly than mere facts.
CONT You're also operating under the mistaken idea that scientific theories are nothing more than baseless speculation, something which couldn't be further from the truth. This particular misconception has been corrected by others though, yet you're still holding to it, so one can only assume that this is a willful bit of ignorance on your part.
@UNDERDOGTAHOE ArcanaKnight is right you know, scientific theory will never become a scientific fact, no matter how correct it is. Look up Cell theory, or Germ theory.
IT's amazing how creationists love to mixt things up to confuse people. Evolution is a fact supported by mountains of evidence. Specially sinse we understand DNA. We use evolution principles in agriculture, medecine and reseach. It is the pillar of all biology books. It has nothing to do with the origin of life. Intelligent desing is nothing more than religion. All your stupid argument have been proven wrong in a court of law in 2005. Science has nothing to do with belief, only evidence matter..
Scientific method has proven noting concerning Evolution and you are the religious nut..I seek truth. Open to all facts not your forced dogma which is false.
@UNDERDOGTAHOE Oh this is so sad that you have to get your basic science education from a YouTube comments section. Your lack of any science education is embarrassing and you don't even know it. Facts are nothing more than single data points "theory" explains the facts. It does not means guess, it means the accepted reason the facts are as they are. Theory of relativity does not mean a guess, atomic theory does not mean a guess, germ theory does not mean a guess. Get it yet?
Again,no argument so you revert to insults. theory by definition is unproven.
The English word theory was derived from a technical term in Ancient Greek philosophy. The word theoria, θεωρία, meant "a looking at, viewing, beholding", and referring to contemplation or speculation,
@UNDERDOGTAHOE If it is not just bold face lie about wanting to gain knowledge, here is a very simple way of glimpsing the last two thousand years of scientific discovery. Go to Wikipedia and READ what it says on: "Geologic Time". " Evolution" "Creationism" and" intelligent Design". You will find that science accepts that evolution is part reality and Creationism is a religious children's story. The evidence is there.
@UNDERDOGTAHOE Theory: A body of concepts and ideas, from which accurate testable predictions can and have be derived and found to comply with open and demonstrable evidence over and over again, despite the fact that there are also findings that could falsify it.
Expelled was proof you refuse any other proof or arguments and your "Peers" are forced into silence to keep teaching or working. Has nothing to do with religion. Just how education is forced to see things rather than USE THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD.
@UNDERDOGTAHOE This argument was settled over a hundred years ago. The scientific method is what came to the conclusion that evolution is the explanation for the evidence. Doesn't matter what you believe, what you don't know nor how dogmatically you want to believe your religious myths. I'm not sure who told you that science supports creationism, but they lied to you. It doesn't. That is why natural museums are filled with fossils and not Fred Flintstone with his pet dinosaur.
Again...no real arguments..just they said..you have no intellectual arguments...you avoid facts like the definition of theory etc...you state hypothesis as facts....you are no different than the experts whom claimed the Earth is Flat..because they said so...
because so many agree...you have no real knowledge and refer to insulting people...
I do have a understanding.Read Darwin's black Box written by biologists..your arguments are wrong and you can not fight math....you are a religion but refuse to acknowledge it...you cling to outdated theories because you are afraid to see what is in front of you.. Intelligent design. Complex systems so advanced it can not happen by chance. i can provide hundreds of books suppressed by the universities.. also watch expelled by Ben Stein and see just how afraid universities are of any challengers.
@UNDERDOGTAHOE And the hole gets deeper still. No one claims that evolution happens by chance. Again you are simply advertising your lack of understanding how evolution works and the mountains of scientific evidence for it. Watch the video, otherwise I'm not going to make up for your lack of scientific understanding in a You Tube comments section. Expelled was a piece of unscientific religious propaganda garbage and I can show you why, but you won't believe me, you don't accept science anyway
@UNDERDOGTAHOE Watch the video and get some scientific understanding. All you are doing is digging your own intellectual hole. If you watch the video, you will at least have a better understanding of what you are refuting.
@UNDERDOGTAHOE Digging a deeper hole. The term is:," I couldn't care less" In any case, It does not matter what you believe. Reality is reality regardless of what you believe. Science unlocks the workings of nature. If you want to understand how nature works, then study science, If you want to remain a religious dogmatists, blind to how nature works, then be my guest. I don't care if you accept reality, but I will show you where you can learn what it is. Watch the video, that will help you.
i am educated and you have just proven you know nothing.theory.
defined.The English word theory was derived from a technical term in Ancient Greek philosophy. The word theoria, θεωρία, meant "a looking at, viewing, beholding", and referring to contemplation or speculation,
SPECULATION. can not help it if you do not know your own language...I do.
speculation. Unproven. Get over your high and mighty self and have real arguments rather than insults and nonsense.
i am educated and you have just proven you know nothing.theory.
defined.The English word theory was derived from a technical term in Ancient Greek philosophy. The word theoria, θεωρία, meant "a looking at, viewing, beholding", and referring to contemplation or speculation,
again..you have no evidence or argument..just lies and false statements...why you state things as facts and have no evidence...you state things like they are proven this and proven that...if it is a fact..why is it still called a THEORY? oh that's right...no proof...so you state things as facts when they are not and refer to insulting people because you have no argument... A half an eye does not function..and it needs counterparts in the brain like optic nerves etc..
@UNDERDOGTAHOE Irreducible Complexity is supported by creationist Michael Behe and was evaluated both by evolutionary biologist (and christian) Ken Miller as well as evaluated in a court of law. In both cases, irreducible complexity was shown to be invalid and creationism was shown to be a religious belief system not supported by scientific evidence. For a better understanding of Irreducible Complexity and evidence against it, please watch: Qualiasoup: Irreducible complexity cut down to size"
Creationnist will never give up......JUST BECAUSE YOU DONT UNDERSTAND SOMETHING, IT'S DOES'NT PROVE THAT GOD IS BEHIND IT.....AND EVEN LESS YOUR GOD.... shut up and let the real scientist do their job.
@scubandre1 you're an idiot, aren't you...just because you put something in CAPS doesn't mean it's true or even makes sense. Who you do you think started the Universitys in this country...Christians. Our Creator is the Lord God Almighty, don't worry, you'll meet him some day, wouldn't want to be in your shoes then pal. There is no proof whatsoever for your false theory of evolution, pay attention.
@willibear7 There is more scientific evidence for evolution than creationism by several orders of magnitude. It amazes me that in a time where we understand atomic theory, relativity, star formation, evolution, cosmology and the human genome, there are still intellectual knuckle draggers who reject science in favor of a 6,000 year old earth, Adam and Eve, the garden of Eden, a talking snake, and Noah's ark. Amazingly willful ignorance.
@coolgreyoneabby that is false...it is a theory because their are no facts supporting evolution only speculation...you choose to ignore the evidence against evolution. intelligent design is present everywhere..you even admit 'systems" are present in nature which proves an intelligence.
what came first..central nervous system,heart,blood,stomach,brain,eyes,lungs....it is a complete system which has to have all parts to work...no chance of limited steps...does half a brain work or 1/3 of an eye?
@UNDERDOGTAHOE of course it works, if you educate yourself on eye evolution instead of listening to your pseudo scientific guru!!! This irreductible complexity argument have been proven wrong long time ago. Watch the mouse trap video about that....very easy
@UNDERDOGTAHOE Every sentence you wrote just advertised in bright blinking letters that you do not have a scientific education. First, evolution is a fact just like gravity. Second, in the context of science, "THEORY" does NOT mean unproven hypothesis. "Theory" means the accepted scientific explanation of WHY the facts are facts, like Theory of Relativity, Germ Theory and Atomic Theory. Third, you are referring to irreducible complexity which has been debunked by real science many times.
@UNDERDOGTAHOE the real insult is people like you trying to refute scientific fact with ignorant argument. If you dont beleive in gravity i suggest you to jump of the 10th floor....good luck
@scubandre1 who said i do not believe in gravity..Proven...while your other Facts are in fact..theory... that's right unproven....that is why it is called a theory....when theories are proven...only then are they facts...it is still the evolutionary wait for it.......Theory.
it is a fact not one scientist has ever created life out of something which is not already alive...FACT..see the difference...
This is also why you revert to insulting people...sign of a weak mind.....weak argument....
@UNDERDOGTAHOE that because your an idiot, just like other creationist....Scientific "Theory" explains facts. An evolution do not explain how life starts but how life evolved.... How can we not think you are a bunch of scientific morrons??? Stop listening to the Dukes of Hazzard and finish you high school....
Wow this is pretty solid evidence. Pity they couldn't be bothered to present it under oath during Kitzmiller v. Dover. Or to do any meaningful scientific research or produce any useful application for Creationis- I mean, "Intelligent Design". I wonder why...
there are unbreakable laws of nature, if god made everything why can't this laws of nature be broken not even by him, THAT"S why we dn't see Croco-ducks. in a world ruled only by nature life is shaped around the laws If only god could create these laws would be unnecessary.
What proof? There is no proof, it's a supernatural concept to explain the natural world. Where's the evidence of a designer other than the idea in the back of your mind? Intuition isn't proof, just as faith isn't. Intelligent design is repackaged creationism, I can't believe people believe in such nonsense. It's disgusting to think people use the god of gaps to explain theories with mounds of scientific research. Lack of knowledge isn't proof of anything, nature is just that complex.
@Petey0707 What do you mean ridiclous?!?!, its ridiculous to think that something as complicated as a tiny cell just happended from random time and chance!, thats crazy!
any one using rationality and logic would think, somebody or something must have designed them like this!, random chance and time is not intelligent!, God is!.
@85Aheadstix It's ridiculous that you think that's how things happened, and that's how you think I interpret how life came about. Abiogenesis explains it clearly. I suggest you stop using the fallacy, god of gaps, and take a class on biology, otherwise stfu with your illogical nagging. Just because your intelligence isn't high enough to comprehend how nature works does NOT mean a "designer" created life. There's no proof aside from your own faith and intuition, which isnt proof at all.
@joemoe23 Evolution and religion are contradictions in comparison to each other, any nitwit with half a brain and a high school education can see the proof and mounds of evidence. But whatever, believe in supernatural beings that don't exist if it makes you sleep in night. Just don't come at me saying your correct when you can't even provide the burden of proof.
I love how this video is built upon assertion after another. "this seems like it's designed, design needs a designer, it is like a software, software needs a designer, ah, we have just proven god"....wait, did I miss something? where did we actually SHOW that everything is designed? Or that it actually needs a designer? All I'm hearing are baseless assumptions and assertions.
On oversight in this video... all these creators can be traced. We have evidence of the creator of Mt. Rushmore. We have evidence of ancient civilizations that created those etchings, stone arrangements, etc.. We have no evidence of the creator of DNA.
@iz2sicc and if you couldn't trace it back to those persons, would you then assume they formed on their own? probably not. This is just a unique case of not wanting to accept what is right in front of you.
@semitope Taking a page from Blaise Pascal's book are we? Alright, I'll humor you. You posed a hypothetical scenario that isn't even remotely likely. Point me to a structure where no evidence has been found that it was created by a human being. There's always tools, roads, paths, skeletal remains, or other evidence of that nature. There's absolutely 0 tangible evidence for intelligent design of DNA. In Pascal's honor, I will ask you, the religious person, what if you're wrong?
@iz2sicc lol. Likely or not, consider the situation. You are dodging. Imagine there are no tools, no evidence of people, NOTHING! You see a car sitting around with no way of knowing who made it, would you go about trying to figure how it made itself or assume someone made it? Your bias is that God is not an option for you
@semitope See, that's where most of you overtly religious people fail at... debating. You don't bring hypothetical scenarios into a debate because the exact same tool can be used against you. Let's continue this little "if" game and extend it to you. What if your God doesn't exist? To answer your ignorant scenario, it's very easy to figure out who made the car. There's likely a badge and even English letters. Hmm, let's see... language, markings, and technology... I say Dinosaurs made it.
@iz2sicc I said no way of tracing who made it. You just can't understand the scenario, huh? Would you assume someone intelligent made it or not? If God doesn't exist then we pretty damn lucky to have this planet.
@semitope Of course I can't understand your scenario. A car without a badge or name on it? How outlandish are you trying to be? You're not even working in the realm of logic here. You're really stretching. What next? There's no technology in a car? Any form of technology denotes intelligent design. DNA is not technology. It is biology. Now answer my question... WHAT IF YOU'RE WRONG ABOUT GOD? Wrap your head around my outlandish question.
@iz2sicc its a pretty simple scenario tho. meh. I guess I can't really expect much sense from you. Like i said, If i am wrong about God then we are lucky to have this planet and all that is on it. The universe even, but otherwise it doesn't really matter. if I am wrong about God there is no consequence, nothing. If I am right about God tho, the consequences for you, and others like you who deny him, are severe. *Shrug*
@semitope Again with Pascal's Wager. Good Lord (pun intended). You can't expect much "sense" from me? Yet you're the one talking about a car without a badge or label? NARF??? Okay here, I would believe that SpongeBob made the weird object with four round things on it to roll on that only starts when this weird jagged metal is inserted into yet another round shaped thing inside these odd metal pieces that swing open after lifting this odd tab that fits into the hand.
@iz2sicc you asked me what if there was no God. What answer did you expect but the truth? That is the answer to your questio nand it doesn't matter what label you put on it. I doubt anyone would give you a different answer. You don't ask what makes up water and expect something other than hydrogen and oxygen.
@semitope No, your answer was complete after the "I would appreciate this planet" comment. But no, you had to, just had to, include that someone like me will burn in hell for eternity since we question God's existence. Typical Christian. So righteous, but only to other believers. Let's bash ever other human being that doesn't believe. GOD, I wish you guys could just see yourselves for even a moment outside of your beliefs.
@iz2sicc the answer wasn't complete. lol. LOL. You ask me "what if there is no God" and you expect the answer to be limited to that? Really? There are consequences to there being a God so why should I not consider the lack of consequences if there wasn't? All you are doing is showing how small minded you are, and you want to blame me for that. I like to be thorough, I won't cut that just to please your sensitivity.
@semitope Of course you won't please my sensitivity. You are Christian. You guys murder Jews and burn Gays.
"What if there's no God?"
"I would appreciate the planet then"
It's complete enough. You just wanted another reason to point out that non-believers will burn in hell. Macabre at it's core. Go on simpleton... believe in your deity and damn all those who oppose the thought. Throw all logic out of the window and dream up inventions like cars without badges and labels and technology.
@iz2sicc you're pretty daft you know? You want to ignore logic and create your own truth just because you don't like something. What i said was a full answer and no part of it needed to be excluded. If you don't want the answer, don't ask the question.
@semitope Oh, personal insults now. How Christian of you. Is that how God operates? This is the deity you worship? I ignore logic and create my own truth? This coming from a person who created the hypothetical scenario about a car that can't be traced? I'M MAKING MY OWN TRUTH YOU SAY!? Dear God and his baby Jesus you are ignorant. Since we are getting personal, you're an IDIOT. We all know SPONGEBOB created this universe. Prove to me that he didn't! Believe or suffer an eternity of burning hell!
@semitope Ooooh, condescending to boot. So since you were created in God's image, that makes God both insulting and condescending. Nice. Glad you get to spend eternity with him. And you still haven't proved to me that SpongeBob didn't create DNA.
@Petey0707 Actually, HAIL HIM OR DROWN IN THE OCEAN OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN. Now go give me 10 Hail Larry the Lobsters to repent your evil sins.
@semitope I hope that, in the least, you realize that you would most likely be just as adamant about the belief in Zeus and Thor had you been born a Viking. Just some food for thought there.
@semitope By the way, maybe you're just too ignorant to realize that Atheists don't claim God doesn't exist. They simply refute the claim that God does exist. Present them with scientific evidence and they will believe. And you're wrong about me. I'm not an Atheist or a Theist. I can neither confirm nor deny the existence of a higher power. I just refute the Christian definition of one. You overtly religious go out of your way to shove your beliefs down others' throats.
@iz2sicc blah blah blah. You lukewarm BS won't fly when you die. Atheists " don't claim God doesn't exist. They simply refute the claim that God does exist. "? What the hell is that supposed to me? Atheists think there is no God, agnostics are confused atheists/theists. You are probably agnostic with that post but I really don't care.
@semitope Simple. Give an Atheist evidence of God and they will believe. Not some hypothetical bullshit like you stated over and over. Go play your what if games with children. They are excellent at imagining outlandish things. Outlandish thoughts like cars without labels, badges, or technology.
What happens when you die? Have you told lies, stolen, used God's name in vain(10 Commandments)? If yes, then you're a liar, thief, and a blasphemer in the sight of God. When you die & be judged by God, you'll be guilty of sin, & go to Hell! But God sent His Son Jesus to shed His blood & die on a cross for your sins, He was buried & rose again from the dead on the third day. If you'll believe the Gospel(Jesus's death for your sins, His burial & resurrection)you'll not perish & have eternal life
Was it just me or were all of the examples inanimate ? I once read and argument that "disproved" evolution that said "if you pit a car on a garage and left it for hundreds of years it wouldn't evolve". That's what I felt like I was watching now! I'm sure there were moths during the industrial revolution that, over a series of generations became black as the smoke made everything dirty. Or some lizards in the Mediterranean that, when moved to a new island witha new diet quickly evolved new featu
Classic design argument. "Look at this man made item, it was created by man, therefore the universe and life were designed. Complexity, complexity, complexity, look how complex the universe is, complexity. Complexity, complexity, complexity, complexity, look at this cell, it's complicated, complexity, therefore, design."
@buttface112211 you should watch Intelligent Design for dummies by user onceforgivennowfree...since you are just as unintelligent and uninformed as PZ Myers is ....:))
@buttface112211 yes i know buttface...and thats what i said...you are both...uninformed and unintelligent..and there is nothing worse then that...when you combine these 2....
@giska1000 Intelligent Design is not a scientific theory, as many would like to claim, it was deemed not scientific in the court of law in the Kitzmiller v. Dover case. It is not even a testable hypothesis, and no experiments can be conducted to evaluate or validate the hypothesis.
@buttface112211 umm...yes it is...i as an evolutionist who defended evolution until i graduated got BSc and MSc degrees in (biology,microbiology,biochemistry and genetics-molekularna biologija) and diplomas in philosophy and hisrtory....THEN...i left darwinism...just like more and more europeans here do today....because darwinism is AGAINST everything..EVERYTHING we observe today including natural selection,mutation and ,,survival of the fittest,, hypothesis...
@buttface112211 and lets just mention that Intelligent Design is testable hypothesis...darwinian theory is not...and who ever told you so lied you...especially when it comes to molecular biology and fossil record....evolution is comoletely wrong theory just like geocentrism was up until 17th century when few scientists actually proposed new theory...and they were called lunatics also and heliocentrism was called ,,pseudoscience,, ...unscientific ..etc..but look at heliocentrism now....
@giska1000 The theory of Evolution is a testable hypothesis, hense why it was promoted to a theory, and the scientific definition of the term theory is different than its everyday use. Evolution has been observed in various insects and microorganisms under labratory conditions. Perhaps you can point to a legitimate source that clearly explains how molecular biology and the fossil record contradict the theory of evolution. The fossil record does not contradict evolution as far as I'm aware.
@buttface112211 The theory of Evolution is a testable hypothesis, hense why it was promoted to a theory
....umm..are you sure about that mister buttface??give me one..JUST ONE...such test??? Evolution has been observed in various insects and microorganisms under labratory conditions.
..ummm...give me names of at least one of these organismssir???
@buttface112211 Perhaps you can point to a legitimate source that clearly explains how molecular biology and the fossil record contradict the theory of evolution. The fossil record does not contradict evolution as far as I'm aware.
..well..as far as yo are NOT aware....but we ll come to this subject..(including dating methods too) after you answer my previous questions ...:)))
@ItssBrian "soft tissue was found in dinosaur bones" Here's an article that discusses that finding, and also includes links to discussions on how creationists have distorted similar research in the past.
@giska1000 You obviously lied about those credentials becuase you evidently lack the proper education to distinguish theory from hypothesis. A hypothesis is an idea that is yet to acquire any evidence and experimentation to observe and verify the hypothesis. Even if evolution is wrong, that does not make Intelligent Design correct, if it did, then that is a logical fallacy. Intelligent Design can not be tested in labratory conditions, it is not science, it is a rebranding of creationism.
@aarhallenbeck How could some of the scientists permit themselves to make a claim that would necessitate knowledge as extensive as the scheme of the universe, when their knowledge of the total scheme of being is *close* to zero, when confronted with a whole mass of unknowns concerning this very earth and tangible, lifeless matter, let alone the whole universe?
@1tabligh I don't know what "claim" you're talking about, but I'm going to go ahead and assume you're talking about the claim that CREATIONISTS make; rejected by most scientists, because of lack of evidence. Scientists only "permit themselves to make a claim" when they have a pretty damn good reason to, because they are the ones that are actually looking for the answers and have the evidence to back up those claims. Also, don't accuse people of deluding themselves until you get an education.
@aarhallenbeck Do scientific discoveries and knowledge cause such a scientist to conclude that matter, *** unknowing and unperceiving ***, is his creator and that of all beings?
@1tabligh Whatever question you are trying to ask is ambiguous, meaningless, and irrelevant to any form coherent argument. We are made of matter, yes. Is matter our "creator"? Completely meaningless.
@aarhallenbeck How can it be supposed that belief in the existence of God is the acceptance of contradiction, whereas belief in the uncaused nature of an effect such as matter is not contradictory?
How could it be believed that matter should itself be the origin of millions of attributes and characteristics and thus be the equivalent of the purposeful, wise and all-knowing Creator?
Then how can the atheists and some of the scientists delude themselve and believe that hydrogen and oxygen, electrons and protons, should first produce themselves, then be the source for all other beings, and finally decree the laws that regulate themselves and the rest of the material world?
@dusktreader13 to give or get information you have to have intelligence right ? for information to be created there had to be a designer.information just does not create its self that ia impossible.
"to give or get information" - You really need to be more specific than this. And, no, complexity does not require design. There are many examples in science and math of complex structures that arise from entities interacting based upon simple local rules. In evolution, these local rules change on the basis of small increments of random mutation, the *minority* of which are beneficial and become new inherited traits. This is emergent complexity, and it is self-creating.
Our ability to infere "design" is completely flawed. That's why ID is not science! The first thing we learn in science is that our senses DECEIVE us most of the time! I can show you a lot of pictures, scultures, etc, wich seem perfectly designed for some purpose, like simetric patterns wich "works" like flor decorations, and wich every artist will say they were designed for that purpose, but instead they were produced only due NATURE'S LAWS. No goal, no design. Only one fact falsifies a sentence
This video is talking about objects that are not alive . These were stupid examples . This video just explains that the maker of the video does not understand evolution .
Small probability + detection = design?, What a crock of s*^t.
There is no product of intelligence, Flagellants and protein type bio-molecular organisms ARE self encoding replicating software which stem from naturalistic evolution, not intelligent design, its been proven kiddies.
@exiledregiment very succinct answer. Of course, we are answering to people that deal in massive generalities and magic compensating for ignorance....
Ugh.... discovery institute and intelligent design.... Hmmmm not a religious organization. Please someone tell me what designer can create all life on the planet ? It either goes to time traveler, aliens, or god. If youre going to fart in my face don't try to cover it up with some big words to make it seem like its not just a pile of shit.
I love that stephen meyers puts human intelligence on the exact same level as the god he believes in. Kind of interesting. Object recognition by us is not any proof of intelligence outside ourselves, simply that we are intelligent enough to recognize an object that another human has made.
intellegent design does not have to mean god. life on earth could have been formed by nano bots from an intellegent civilization. their universe was dieing. so they sent their genetic code into our young universe using nano bots. those bots wouldhave then recreated their civilization and we might be justthat. look up michio kaku to learn more.
@nannynicky4life Its true that it doesn't HAVE to mean that, but the vast majority of ID proponents see the supposed Designer to mean only one thing (god); the nebulous language of ID was purposely done for the sole reason of getting around the restriction of teaching creationism in school.
If abiogenesis spontaneous creation *without* specific "design" can be admitted under such conditions of regularity, then purposeful generation and definitely balanced creation can be the result of *error* ad perplexity, since these two are *opposed* to abiogenesis.
@1tabligh Spontaneous generation is not opposed to abiogenesis you sub-human garbage, the two are mutually exclusive, abiogenesis doesn't explain conditions of regularity or its spontaneous evolution ( not creation )
If the first protein was created it wouldn't be balanced , because if it was, there would be no need to evolve, use your brain, and think before you use pseudo intellectualism to prove how scientifically smart you are
Such a statement is highly *absurd* that order and rectitude should come about *without* a Creator, and disorder and impropriety of "design" and *fate* should suppose a Creator. He is an *ignoramus* who says this, because anything produced *without* "design" will ***never*** be exact and proportioned, while disorder and contrariness cannot co-exist with orderly design. God is far above what the *deluded and duped ignorant atheists* say.
All praise is due to ALLAH, the Lord of the Universe.
@1tabligh If fate opposed the creator, then why does your allah or "god" have a plan for everyone?, And yes metabolic organisms can rise from non living organisms you need to educate yourself before you mix bullshit analogys like god and science in the same sentence, Do you know what a membrane is?, All the " Tools " that cells need to operate and function are passed on through natural selection and variation with time and genetic drift, god plays no part in the equation, educate yourself.
The principle of causality is a general and universal law and foundation for all efforts of man, both in the acquisition of knowledge and in his customary activities. The strivings of scholars to uncover the cause of every phenomenon, whether natural or social, arise from the belief that no phenomenon originates in and of itself without the intervention of causes and agents.
g24417, You MOCK, SCOFF and LAUGH AT GOD NOW, BUT GOD WILL HAVE The LAST LAUGH ON You, IN The NEAR FUTURE!/ PSALM 1:4 HE (GOD) THAT SITTETH IN The HEAVENS SHALL LAUGH: The LORD SHALL HAVE Them (HEATHENS, Atheists) IN DERISION (SPEAKING UNINTELLIGIBLY, IN CONFUSION)! PROVERBS 1:26 ,29 I (GOD) ALSO WILL LAUGH AT Your (HEATHEN'S, Atheist's) CALAMITY; I WILL MOCK WHEN Your FEAR COMETH; - FOR THAT They HATED KNOWLEDGE (HATED TRUTH), and DID NOT CHOOSE The FEAR (LOVE & REVERENCE) Of The LORD;
@fewovercomers blah blah blah blah-dy blah blah... the only people ''speaking unintelligibly'' are odd-bods like yourself. Your bronze-age threats of ''God's Wrathful Judgement'' are genuinely embarrassing. You don't speak for God, you pompous little tit. You're just some angry sad-sack with an old book and no education in anything newer than 400AD.
You're a dinosaur, so we're going to put you in a museum. And it is WE who will laugh at YOU. Jesus is dead, bucko. Enjoy.
@USERNAMEfieldempty, I Don't Have To Speak For ALMIGHTY GOD, HE SPEAKS FOR HIMSELF, and HE SOON WILL BE IN Your HEATHEN FACE SPEAKING TO You, and Your WEAK Little Knees Will BOW TO GOD!/ ROMANS 14:11 FOR IT IS WRITTEN, AS I LIVE, SAITH The LORD, EVERY KNEE SHALL BOW TO ME, and EVERY TONGUE SHALL CONFESS TO GOD!
@testtubekitten, There Is NOTHING That You or Anyone Else Can Do To Stop GOD'S GREAT WHITE THRONE JUDGMENT Of ALL SOULS AT The END Of The TRUE JESUS CHRIST'S THOUSAND YEAR REIGN ON EARTH, IN The NEAR FUTURE! REVELATION 20:11 ,13 And I SAW a GREAT WHITE THRONE, and HIM (GOD) THAT SAT ON IT, FROM WHOSE FACE The EARTH and The HEAVEN (THIS 2nd EARTH & HEAVEN AGE) FLED AWAY; and THERE WAS FOUND NO PLACE FOR Them! --:and They WERE JUDGED EVERY Man (EVERY SOUL) ACCORDING TO Their WORKS!/ See You There!
@USERNAMEfieldempty, What Makes You Think That ALL Of GOD'S JUDGMENTS ARE DOOM, GOD'S JUDGMENTS UPON HIS FAITHFUL and WISE SERVANTS ARE BLESSINGS, LOVE & ETERNAL LIFE, ONLY GOD'S ENEMIES HAVE SOMETHING TO FEAR! Are You One of GOD'S ENEMIES?/ JAMES 4:4 Ye ADULTERERS (MALE IDOLATERS) and ADULTERESSES (FEMALE IDOLATERS), KNOW Ye NOT THAT The FREINDSHIP Of The WORLD (The WORLD HATES GOD) IS ENMITY (a HATEFUL ENEMY) WITH GOD? WHOSOEVER THEREFORE WILL BE a FRIEND Of The WORLD IS The ENEMY Of GOD!
Why do I get the feeling I'm going to see you on the front page one day with a head-line along the lines of. '' 'I Did It For God' says NightClub Massacre Gun-man.''
@USERNAMEfieldempty, You Ask Why Do You Get That Feeling? Because Your Feelings Are EASILY DECEIVED IN Your STRONG DELUSION Of LOVING and BELIEVING IN LIES, RATHER THAN RECEIVING The LOVE Of The TRUTH, THAT You MIGHT BE SAVED!/ 2 THESSALONIANS 2:10 And WITH ALL DECEIBABLENESS Of UNRIGHTEOUSNESS IN Them THAT PERISH; BECAUSE They RECEIVED NOT The LOVE Of The TRUTH, THAT Thy MIGHT BE SAVED! And FOR THIS CAUSE GOD SHALL SEND Them STRONG DELUSION, THAT They SHOULD BELIEVE a LIE:/ You Are DELUSIONAL!
@fewovercomers God is a lie, your own words: " Your Feelings Are EASILY DECEIVED IN Your STRONG DELUSION Of LOVING and BELIEVING IN LIES, RATHER THAN RECEIVING The LOVE Of The TRUTH"
@USERNAMEfieldempty, The "I AM THAT I AM", The GOD Of ABRAHAM, ISAAC, JACOB (ISRAEL), MOSES, ALL Of The PROPHETS and APOSTLES Of The OVER 3,500 YEAR OLD HOLY BIBLE, and Of ALL TRUE CHRISTIANS, Will Have To Teach You GOD'S TRUTH DURING The TRUE JESUS CHRIST'S MILLENNIUM REIGN ON EARTH!/ REVELATION 20:6 BLESSED and HOLY IS He THAT HATH PART IN The FIRST RESURRECTION: ON SUCH The SECOND DEATH HATH NO POWER, BUT They SHALL BE PRIESTS Of GOD and Of CHRIST, and SHALL REIGN WITH HIM a THOUSAND YEARS!
Your SHOUTING and STREET-PREACHING are mildly amusing, but far for convincing. You're coming off as a swivel-eyed loon, do you know that? LOUD does not equal right, it equals angry.
not even a actual thumprint, a real thumprint of god himself found on a human cell would be proof of intelligence. It just doesn't follow the scientific method. You'd have to then look up the the owner of that thumprint, interview him and have him demonstrate how he can create things out of thin air in front of a panel. anything short of that is human interpretation, a leap to conclusion. NOT EVIDENCE.
Living things are designed by evolution. We know that natural processes can design complex things, because humans design things, and the human mind is produced by the brain, and the function of the brain is a natural process - i.e., chemical and electrical.
@Vincentaneous, You Can NOT PROVE That There Is Evolution of Species, NOR PROVE That So Called "Evolution of Species" Can Design Anything, Because Evolution of Species Is a LIE & JUNK SCIENCE, and IS NOT OBSERVABLE NATURAL PHENOMENA, It Is Only a Figment Of Your Falsely Indoctrinated Imagination!
The Francis Crick quote at the beginning is spot on. Biological organisms, even microbes, are so immensely complex and intricately ordered that we have to remind ourselves that these are evolved and evolving beings. If you forget this fact, you'll jump to incorrect conclusions and make poor hypotheses because your theoretical framework is not aligned with what is demonstrably true in biology.
Bimston 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A question for the ID proponent.
If something is so complex that it must require a designer (which I understand is the basic tenet of ID), and the example of, say, DNA is used to make the point, then there must also exist something so simple that it DOESN`T require a designer. If there isn`t such simplicity, then the word complex has no meaning, because everything then is complex, and therefore everything requires a designer. It`s circular.
So, challenge: Give an example of such simplicity.
RationalThinker1859 1 week ago
"Evolution artificially rules out intelligence before the evidence has a chance to speak." What evidence? Intelligence design has had plenty of time to provide evidence but never does. It had 9 minutes and 27 seconds to do so, and it didn't. UFOlogists could do better than this.
movinbutnotshakin 1 week ago
Paul Nelson is a philosopher of biology. What is that? All I care about is if he knows biology really well. Judging by his statements, he doesn't.
movinbutnotshakin 1 week ago
Now the watchmaker argument has been expanded to include the works of Edward Scissorhands. Good grief.
getsupercharged 2 weeks ago
society can never make the standards for what is right an wrong.all people make mistakes an commit evil acts.there is not person that ever lived that did not do wrong.thats why the evidence is clear that someone who never commited evil an knows all about it set the standard.an jesus said to the leading authorities .which one of you can convict me of sin.they did not answer.god sets the standards of real morality.
MrBeefreetwo 1 month ago
@MrBeefreetwo If that were true, then what is considered to be moral would never change and would be the same for all societies (neither of which is true). Heck, members of the same religion don't even agree on what is moral (as is evidenced by there being so many different denominations).
ArcanaKnight 1 month ago
now no one can know that god exists,but no one can know that he doesnt exist.but after many years of studying all of the so called religions,the evidence for the christian god of the bible has a preponderance of evidence an the archeological findings in every case proves much an not in one dig has it ever been contrary to what the bible said.ive been anagnostic in my early years but like i said chritianity gives the best evidence im my humble opinion of mans origins an what makes him tick.
MrBeefreetwo 1 month ago
@MrBeefreetwo Archeologists finding a place mentioned in the bible does not prove that the stories they are mentioned in are true (you have to look no further than modern authors like John Grisham for proof of that).
ArcanaKnight 1 month ago
@ArcanaKnight I wanted to "like" this comment, but cannot...we all know why. I'd like to do a statistical analysis of YT videos with ratings and/or comments disabled and see how many of them are creationist videos. I think we all know the answer.
getsupercharged 2 weeks ago
then where did it all come from and who sets the standard of what is good an what is evil or bad.why is there something rather than nothing.to say god dont exist makes you quite dumb.
MrBeefreetwo 1 month ago
@MrBeefreetwo "who sets the standard of what is good and what is evil" Society does. That much is evidenced by the fact that morality changes over time and across societal borders.
"why is there something rather than nothing" Why not? Why expect nothing rather than something? In fact, statistics has been used to show that "something" is far more likely than nothing. tinyurlDOTcom/8y2wca3
ArcanaKnight 1 month ago
HAHA! Laughable! They say the complexity of the bacteria is so unexplainable, that they must of been "created". HAHA! That is just an easy way out and a quick answer to something that cannot be explained by ignorant creationists (all of them ignorant). Life didn't need intelligence behind it to begin. Just because we use our intelligence to create things, doesn't give anyone the right to assume that therefore an intelligence must of created life. Get over it and move on, God does not exist FACT
pompeycharlie 1 month ago
stupid religious people...thinking living organisms create new DNA and evolve from nothing..lol
finxoner 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A question for the ID proponent.
If something is so complex that it must require a designer (which I understand is the basic tenet of ID), and the example of, say, DNA is used to make the point, then there must also exist something so simple that it DOESN`T require a designer. If there isn`t such simplicity, then the word complex has no meaning, because everything then is complex, and therefore everything requires a designer. It`s circular.
So, challenge: Give an example of such simplicity.
RationalThinker1859 2 months ago
OMFG this vid is so full of fail.
GallusSapien 2 months ago
They became disbelievers, and because of a *deficiency* of their *knowledge* and *puerility* of *intellect*, began quibbling inimically with Truth, so much so that they *denied* creativeness and claimed that all this *universe* was *meaningless* and vain, without any *ingenious* design on the part of a Designer or Creator *God* - a purposeless non-entity *without* balance or poise.
"........deaf, dumb (and) blind, so they do not understand. "
The Quran 2:171
1tabligh 4 months ago
@1tabligh because a robbing raping murdering pedo is just the kind of guy god would send, huh?
piss be upon the pedo
Rockster969 1 month ago
@Rockster969 piss be upon the pedo
___
So much science for this stupid brainless pseudo-Scientific Demagogue!
How can you delude yourself and believe that hydrogen and oxygen, electrons and protons, should first produce themselves, then be the source for all other beings, and finally decree the laws that regulate themselves and the rest of the material world?
The chain of causality cannot recede into infinity!
Stupid brainless cuckoo atheist with asinine mind!
1tabligh 1 month ago
I have already posted the definitions of theory..facts are proven, this is why it is called a fact...theory is not..thus it is a theory..speculation get over it..
UNDERDOGTAHOE 4 months ago
@UNDERDOGTAHOE You're laboring under a massive misconception of basic scientific concepts. A scientific theory never graduates into becoming a fact once its been proven enough or enough supporting evidence is found; a theory will always be a theory. Facts and theories have different uses in science; that is why there is a fact of gravity and a theory of gravity. Facts just describe whereas theories explain; that's why science values theories more highly than mere facts.
ArcanaKnight 4 months ago
CONT You're also operating under the mistaken idea that scientific theories are nothing more than baseless speculation, something which couldn't be further from the truth. This particular misconception has been corrected by others though, yet you're still holding to it, so one can only assume that this is a willful bit of ignorance on your part.
ArcanaKnight 4 months ago
@UNDERDOGTAHOE ArcanaKnight is right you know, scientific theory will never become a scientific fact, no matter how correct it is. Look up Cell theory, or Germ theory.
Casshyr 3 months ago
@Casshyr A scientific theory is the strongest statement you can say about reality. What is you point?
Rockster969 1 month ago
IT's amazing how creationists love to mixt things up to confuse people. Evolution is a fact supported by mountains of evidence. Specially sinse we understand DNA. We use evolution principles in agriculture, medecine and reseach. It is the pillar of all biology books. It has nothing to do with the origin of life. Intelligent desing is nothing more than religion. All your stupid argument have been proven wrong in a court of law in 2005. Science has nothing to do with belief, only evidence matter..
scubandre1 4 months ago
Scientific method has proven noting concerning Evolution and you are the religious nut..I seek truth. Open to all facts not your forced dogma which is false.
UNDERDOGTAHOE 4 months ago
Theories are analytical tools for understanding, explaining, and making predictions
PREDICTIONS. not FACTS.
UNDERDOGTAHOE 4 months ago
@UNDERDOGTAHOE Oh this is so sad that you have to get your basic science education from a YouTube comments section. Your lack of any science education is embarrassing and you don't even know it. Facts are nothing more than single data points "theory" explains the facts. It does not means guess, it means the accepted reason the facts are as they are. Theory of relativity does not mean a guess, atomic theory does not mean a guess, germ theory does not mean a guess. Get it yet?
coolgreyoneabby 4 months ago
Again,no argument so you revert to insults. theory by definition is unproven.
The English word theory was derived from a technical term in Ancient Greek philosophy. The word theoria, θεωρία, meant "a looking at, viewing, beholding", and referring to contemplation or speculation,
Speculation. you know an educated GUESS!
UNDERDOGTAHOE 4 months ago
@UNDERDOGTAHOE If it is not just bold face lie about wanting to gain knowledge, here is a very simple way of glimpsing the last two thousand years of scientific discovery. Go to Wikipedia and READ what it says on: "Geologic Time". " Evolution" "Creationism" and" intelligent Design". You will find that science accepts that evolution is part reality and Creationism is a religious children's story. The evidence is there.
coolgreyoneabby 4 months ago
@UNDERDOGTAHOE Theory: A body of concepts and ideas, from which accurate testable predictions can and have be derived and found to comply with open and demonstrable evidence over and over again, despite the fact that there are also findings that could falsify it.
Creationism: AKA talking out of your ass.
TomFynn 4 months ago
Expelled was proof you refuse any other proof or arguments and your "Peers" are forced into silence to keep teaching or working. Has nothing to do with religion. Just how education is forced to see things rather than USE THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD.
you are afraid of science.
UNDERDOGTAHOE 4 months ago
@UNDERDOGTAHOE This argument was settled over a hundred years ago. The scientific method is what came to the conclusion that evolution is the explanation for the evidence. Doesn't matter what you believe, what you don't know nor how dogmatically you want to believe your religious myths. I'm not sure who told you that science supports creationism, but they lied to you. It doesn't. That is why natural museums are filled with fossils and not Fred Flintstone with his pet dinosaur.
coolgreyoneabby 4 months ago
@coolgreyoneabby Actually this is a problem too, there is museums whit Fred Flinstone running beside dinausores and it is a very scary thing....
scubandre1 4 months ago
I watched your video...still no real arguments...just more SPECULATIONS.
A religion. Dogma for sure.
UNDERDOGTAHOE 4 months ago
Again...no real arguments..just they said..you have no intellectual arguments...you avoid facts like the definition of theory etc...you state hypothesis as facts....you are no different than the experts whom claimed the Earth is Flat..because they said so...
because so many agree...you have no real knowledge and refer to insulting people...
sign of a weak mind and a weak argument...
UNDERDOGTAHOE 4 months ago
I do have a understanding.Read Darwin's black Box written by biologists..your arguments are wrong and you can not fight math....you are a religion but refuse to acknowledge it...you cling to outdated theories because you are afraid to see what is in front of you.. Intelligent design. Complex systems so advanced it can not happen by chance. i can provide hundreds of books suppressed by the universities.. also watch expelled by Ben Stein and see just how afraid universities are of any challengers.
UNDERDOGTAHOE 4 months ago
@UNDERDOGTAHOE And the hole gets deeper still. No one claims that evolution happens by chance. Again you are simply advertising your lack of understanding how evolution works and the mountains of scientific evidence for it. Watch the video, otherwise I'm not going to make up for your lack of scientific understanding in a You Tube comments section. Expelled was a piece of unscientific religious propaganda garbage and I can show you why, but you won't believe me, you don't accept science anyway
coolgreyoneabby 4 months ago
I could care less what the court of law says..it said black people were animals once...need better arguments than they said so...get real...
UNDERDOGTAHOE 4 months ago
@UNDERDOGTAHOE Watch the video and get some scientific understanding. All you are doing is digging your own intellectual hole. If you watch the video, you will at least have a better understanding of what you are refuting.
coolgreyoneabby 4 months ago
@UNDERDOGTAHOE Digging a deeper hole. The term is:," I couldn't care less" In any case, It does not matter what you believe. Reality is reality regardless of what you believe. Science unlocks the workings of nature. If you want to understand how nature works, then study science, If you want to remain a religious dogmatists, blind to how nature works, then be my guest. I don't care if you accept reality, but I will show you where you can learn what it is. Watch the video, that will help you.
coolgreyoneabby 4 months ago
Gravity can be tested and proven..why are you guys afraid of any real investigation?
Afraid your SPECULATION will be proven wrong? Why you state speculation as FACTS!
You refuse to even consider Intelligent Design because it would ruin your religion of evolution.
UNDERDOGTAHOE 4 months ago
i am educated and you have just proven you know nothing.theory.
defined.The English word theory was derived from a technical term in Ancient Greek philosophy. The word theoria, θεωρία, meant "a looking at, viewing, beholding", and referring to contemplation or speculation,
SPECULATION. can not help it if you do not know your own language...I do.
speculation. Unproven. Get over your high and mighty self and have real arguments rather than insults and nonsense.
UNDERDOGTAHOE 4 months ago
i am educated and you have just proven you know nothing.theory.
defined.The English word theory was derived from a technical term in Ancient Greek philosophy. The word theoria, θεωρία, meant "a looking at, viewing, beholding", and referring to contemplation or speculation,
UNDERDOGTAHOE 4 months ago
again..you have no evidence or argument..just lies and false statements...why you state things as facts and have no evidence...you state things like they are proven this and proven that...if it is a fact..why is it still called a THEORY? oh that's right...no proof...so you state things as facts when they are not and refer to insulting people because you have no argument... A half an eye does not function..and it needs counterparts in the brain like optic nerves etc..
UNDERDOGTAHOE 4 months ago
@UNDERDOGTAHOE Irreducible Complexity is supported by creationist Michael Behe and was evaluated both by evolutionary biologist (and christian) Ken Miller as well as evaluated in a court of law. In both cases, irreducible complexity was shown to be invalid and creationism was shown to be a religious belief system not supported by scientific evidence. For a better understanding of Irreducible Complexity and evidence against it, please watch: Qualiasoup: Irreducible complexity cut down to size"
coolgreyoneabby 4 months ago
Shows how good the Annunaki was DNA manipulation way cool
SuperTomcatUk 5 months ago
Creationnist will never give up......JUST BECAUSE YOU DONT UNDERSTAND SOMETHING, IT'S DOES'NT PROVE THAT GOD IS BEHIND IT.....AND EVEN LESS YOUR GOD.... shut up and let the real scientist do their job.
scubandre1 5 months ago
@scubandre1 you're an idiot, aren't you...just because you put something in CAPS doesn't mean it's true or even makes sense. Who you do you think started the Universitys in this country...Christians. Our Creator is the Lord God Almighty, don't worry, you'll meet him some day, wouldn't want to be in your shoes then pal. There is no proof whatsoever for your false theory of evolution, pay attention.
willibear7 5 months ago
@willibear7 There is more scientific evidence for evolution than creationism by several orders of magnitude. It amazes me that in a time where we understand atomic theory, relativity, star formation, evolution, cosmology and the human genome, there are still intellectual knuckle draggers who reject science in favor of a 6,000 year old earth, Adam and Eve, the garden of Eden, a talking snake, and Noah's ark. Amazingly willful ignorance.
coolgreyoneabby 5 months ago
@coolgreyoneabby that is false...it is a theory because their are no facts supporting evolution only speculation...you choose to ignore the evidence against evolution. intelligent design is present everywhere..you even admit 'systems" are present in nature which proves an intelligence.
what came first..central nervous system,heart,blood,stomach,brain,eyes,lungs....it is a complete system which has to have all parts to work...no chance of limited steps...does half a brain work or 1/3 of an eye?
UNDERDOGTAHOE 4 months ago
@UNDERDOGTAHOE of course it works, if you educate yourself on eye evolution instead of listening to your pseudo scientific guru!!! This irreductible complexity argument have been proven wrong long time ago. Watch the mouse trap video about that....very easy
scubandre1 4 months ago
@UNDERDOGTAHOE Every sentence you wrote just advertised in bright blinking letters that you do not have a scientific education. First, evolution is a fact just like gravity. Second, in the context of science, "THEORY" does NOT mean unproven hypothesis. "Theory" means the accepted scientific explanation of WHY the facts are facts, like Theory of Relativity, Germ Theory and Atomic Theory. Third, you are referring to irreducible complexity which has been debunked by real science many times.
coolgreyoneabby 4 months ago
@scubandre1 when you have no argument with logic you resort to insults...and CAPS which everyone thinks is rude.
UNDERDOGTAHOE 4 months ago
@UNDERDOGTAHOE the real insult is people like you trying to refute scientific fact with ignorant argument. If you dont beleive in gravity i suggest you to jump of the 10th floor....good luck
scubandre1 4 months ago
@scubandre1 who said i do not believe in gravity..Proven...while your other Facts are in fact..theory... that's right unproven....that is why it is called a theory....when theories are proven...only then are they facts...it is still the evolutionary wait for it.......Theory.
it is a fact not one scientist has ever created life out of something which is not already alive...FACT..see the difference...
This is also why you revert to insulting people...sign of a weak mind.....weak argument....
UNDERDOGTAHOE 4 months ago
@UNDERDOGTAHOE that because your an idiot, just like other creationist....Scientific "Theory" explains facts. An evolution do not explain how life starts but how life evolved.... How can we not think you are a bunch of scientific morrons??? Stop listening to the Dukes of Hazzard and finish you high school....
scubandre1 4 months ago
Wow this is pretty solid evidence. Pity they couldn't be bothered to present it under oath during Kitzmiller v. Dover. Or to do any meaningful scientific research or produce any useful application for Creationis- I mean, "Intelligent Design". I wonder why...
maxpower1227 6 months ago
there are unbreakable laws of nature, if god made everything why can't this laws of nature be broken not even by him, THAT"S why we dn't see Croco-ducks. in a world ruled only by nature life is shaped around the laws If only god could create these laws would be unnecessary.
Nixom1334 6 months ago
What proof? There is no proof, it's a supernatural concept to explain the natural world. Where's the evidence of a designer other than the idea in the back of your mind? Intuition isn't proof, just as faith isn't. Intelligent design is repackaged creationism, I can't believe people believe in such nonsense. It's disgusting to think people use the god of gaps to explain theories with mounds of scientific research. Lack of knowledge isn't proof of anything, nature is just that complex.
Petey0707 6 months ago
@Petey0707 What do you mean ridiclous?!?!, its ridiculous to think that something as complicated as a tiny cell just happended from random time and chance!, thats crazy!
any one using rationality and logic would think, somebody or something must have designed them like this!, random chance and time is not intelligent!, God is!.
85Aheadstix 5 months ago
@85Aheadstix It's ridiculous that you think that's how things happened, and that's how you think I interpret how life came about. Abiogenesis explains it clearly. I suggest you stop using the fallacy, god of gaps, and take a class on biology, otherwise stfu with your illogical nagging. Just because your intelligence isn't high enough to comprehend how nature works does NOT mean a "designer" created life. There's no proof aside from your own faith and intuition, which isnt proof at all.
Petey0707 5 months ago
@Petey0707 booooo. btw Im not religious but evolutionism is an elitists religion which is controlled from the top down by a few.
joemoe23 5 months ago
@joemoe23 Evolution and religion are contradictions in comparison to each other, any nitwit with half a brain and a high school education can see the proof and mounds of evidence. But whatever, believe in supernatural beings that don't exist if it makes you sleep in night. Just don't come at me saying your correct when you can't even provide the burden of proof.
Petey0707 5 months ago
@Petey0707 Im not religious but I do have a rational mind.
joemoe23 5 months ago
I love how this video is built upon assertion after another. "this seems like it's designed, design needs a designer, it is like a software, software needs a designer, ah, we have just proven god"....wait, did I miss something? where did we actually SHOW that everything is designed? Or that it actually needs a designer? All I'm hearing are baseless assumptions and assertions.
juuonse 7 months ago
'Ratings have been disabled...'
That's a surprise.
ToffeeAppleTerror 7 months ago
On oversight in this video... all these creators can be traced. We have evidence of the creator of Mt. Rushmore. We have evidence of ancient civilizations that created those etchings, stone arrangements, etc.. We have no evidence of the creator of DNA.
iz2sicc 7 months ago in playlist creationism vs. evolution
@iz2sicc and if you couldn't trace it back to those persons, would you then assume they formed on their own? probably not. This is just a unique case of not wanting to accept what is right in front of you.
semitope 7 months ago in playlist Intelligent design
@semitope Taking a page from Blaise Pascal's book are we? Alright, I'll humor you. You posed a hypothetical scenario that isn't even remotely likely. Point me to a structure where no evidence has been found that it was created by a human being. There's always tools, roads, paths, skeletal remains, or other evidence of that nature. There's absolutely 0 tangible evidence for intelligent design of DNA. In Pascal's honor, I will ask you, the religious person, what if you're wrong?
iz2sicc 7 months ago
@iz2sicc lol. Likely or not, consider the situation. You are dodging. Imagine there are no tools, no evidence of people, NOTHING! You see a car sitting around with no way of knowing who made it, would you go about trying to figure how it made itself or assume someone made it? Your bias is that God is not an option for you
semitope 7 months ago
@semitope See, that's where most of you overtly religious people fail at... debating. You don't bring hypothetical scenarios into a debate because the exact same tool can be used against you. Let's continue this little "if" game and extend it to you. What if your God doesn't exist? To answer your ignorant scenario, it's very easy to figure out who made the car. There's likely a badge and even English letters. Hmm, let's see... language, markings, and technology... I say Dinosaurs made it.
iz2sicc 7 months ago
@iz2sicc I said no way of tracing who made it. You just can't understand the scenario, huh? Would you assume someone intelligent made it or not? If God doesn't exist then we pretty damn lucky to have this planet.
semitope 7 months ago
@semitope Of course I can't understand your scenario. A car without a badge or name on it? How outlandish are you trying to be? You're not even working in the realm of logic here. You're really stretching. What next? There's no technology in a car? Any form of technology denotes intelligent design. DNA is not technology. It is biology. Now answer my question... WHAT IF YOU'RE WRONG ABOUT GOD? Wrap your head around my outlandish question.
iz2sicc 7 months ago
@iz2sicc its a pretty simple scenario tho. meh. I guess I can't really expect much sense from you. Like i said, If i am wrong about God then we are lucky to have this planet and all that is on it. The universe even, but otherwise it doesn't really matter. if I am wrong about God there is no consequence, nothing. If I am right about God tho, the consequences for you, and others like you who deny him, are severe. *Shrug*
semitope 7 months ago
@semitope Again with Pascal's Wager. Good Lord (pun intended). You can't expect much "sense" from me? Yet you're the one talking about a car without a badge or label? NARF??? Okay here, I would believe that SpongeBob made the weird object with four round things on it to roll on that only starts when this weird jagged metal is inserted into yet another round shaped thing inside these odd metal pieces that swing open after lifting this odd tab that fits into the hand.
iz2sicc 7 months ago
@iz2sicc you asked me what if there was no God. What answer did you expect but the truth? That is the answer to your questio nand it doesn't matter what label you put on it. I doubt anyone would give you a different answer. You don't ask what makes up water and expect something other than hydrogen and oxygen.
GJ admitting that you would think someone made it
semitope 7 months ago
@semitope No, your answer was complete after the "I would appreciate this planet" comment. But no, you had to, just had to, include that someone like me will burn in hell for eternity since we question God's existence. Typical Christian. So righteous, but only to other believers. Let's bash ever other human being that doesn't believe. GOD, I wish you guys could just see yourselves for even a moment outside of your beliefs.
iz2sicc 7 months ago
@iz2sicc the answer wasn't complete. lol. LOL. You ask me "what if there is no God" and you expect the answer to be limited to that? Really? There are consequences to there being a God so why should I not consider the lack of consequences if there wasn't? All you are doing is showing how small minded you are, and you want to blame me for that. I like to be thorough, I won't cut that just to please your sensitivity.
semitope 7 months ago
@semitope Of course you won't please my sensitivity. You are Christian. You guys murder Jews and burn Gays.
"What if there's no God?"
"I would appreciate the planet then"
It's complete enough. You just wanted another reason to point out that non-believers will burn in hell. Macabre at it's core. Go on simpleton... believe in your deity and damn all those who oppose the thought. Throw all logic out of the window and dream up inventions like cars without badges and labels and technology.
iz2sicc 7 months ago
@iz2sicc you're pretty daft you know? You want to ignore logic and create your own truth just because you don't like something. What i said was a full answer and no part of it needed to be excluded. If you don't want the answer, don't ask the question.
semitope 7 months ago
@semitope Oh, personal insults now. How Christian of you. Is that how God operates? This is the deity you worship? I ignore logic and create my own truth? This coming from a person who created the hypothetical scenario about a car that can't be traced? I'M MAKING MY OWN TRUTH YOU SAY!? Dear God and his baby Jesus you are ignorant. Since we are getting personal, you're an IDIOT. We all know SPONGEBOB created this universe. Prove to me that he didn't! Believe or suffer an eternity of burning hell!
iz2sicc 7 months ago
@iz2sicc objective observation. But I guess it is an insult as well. Sucks for you
semitope 7 months ago
@semitope Ooooh, condescending to boot. So since you were created in God's image, that makes God both insulting and condescending. Nice. Glad you get to spend eternity with him. And you still haven't proved to me that SpongeBob didn't create DNA.
iz2sicc 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@iz2sicc evolutionofthehoax.blogspot.com done with you
semitope 7 months ago
@iz2sicc SPONGEBOB, HAIL HIM OR BURN!
Petey0707 6 months ago
@Petey0707 Actually, HAIL HIM OR DROWN IN THE OCEAN OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN. Now go give me 10 Hail Larry the Lobsters to repent your evil sins.
iz2sicc 6 months ago
@iz2sicc YES MASTER! "Hail Larry, Father of Lobsters.." x10
Petey0707 6 months ago
@semitope I hope that, in the least, you realize that you would most likely be just as adamant about the belief in Zeus and Thor had you been born a Viking. Just some food for thought there.
iz2sicc 7 months ago
@semitope By the way, maybe you're just too ignorant to realize that Atheists don't claim God doesn't exist. They simply refute the claim that God does exist. Present them with scientific evidence and they will believe. And you're wrong about me. I'm not an Atheist or a Theist. I can neither confirm nor deny the existence of a higher power. I just refute the Christian definition of one. You overtly religious go out of your way to shove your beliefs down others' throats.
iz2sicc 7 months ago
@iz2sicc blah blah blah. You lukewarm BS won't fly when you die. Atheists " don't claim God doesn't exist. They simply refute the claim that God does exist. "? What the hell is that supposed to me? Atheists think there is no God, agnostics are confused atheists/theists. You are probably agnostic with that post but I really don't care.
semitope 7 months ago
@semitope Simple. Give an Atheist evidence of God and they will believe. Not some hypothetical bullshit like you stated over and over. Go play your what if games with children. They are excellent at imagining outlandish things. Outlandish thoughts like cars without labels, badges, or technology.
iz2sicc 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What happens when you die? Have you told lies, stolen, used God's name in vain(10 Commandments)? If yes, then you're a liar, thief, and a blasphemer in the sight of God. When you die & be judged by God, you'll be guilty of sin, & go to Hell! But God sent His Son Jesus to shed His blood & die on a cross for your sins, He was buried & rose again from the dead on the third day. If you'll believe the Gospel(Jesus's death for your sins, His burial & resurrection)you'll not perish & have eternal life
gramosjr7 7 months ago
Was it just me or were all of the examples inanimate ? I once read and argument that "disproved" evolution that said "if you pit a car on a garage and left it for hundreds of years it wouldn't evolve". That's what I felt like I was watching now! I'm sure there were moths during the industrial revolution that, over a series of generations became black as the smoke made everything dirty. Or some lizards in the Mediterranean that, when moved to a new island witha new diet quickly evolved new featu
sullimandable 8 months ago
Any video that has its ratings disabled is not worth watching. Moving on...
aerhearts 9 months ago
Classic design argument. "Look at this man made item, it was created by man, therefore the universe and life were designed. Complexity, complexity, complexity, look how complex the universe is, complexity. Complexity, complexity, complexity, complexity, look at this cell, it's complicated, complexity, therefore, design."
buttface112211 9 months ago
@buttface112211 you should watch Intelligent Design for dummies by user onceforgivennowfree...since you are just as unintelligent and uninformed as PZ Myers is ....:))
giska1000 9 months ago
@giska1000 You base my intelligence from one comment? Uninformed does not mean unintelligent.
buttface112211 9 months ago
@buttface112211 yes i know buttface...and thats what i said...you are both...uninformed and unintelligent..and there is nothing worse then that...when you combine these 2....
giska1000 9 months ago
@giska1000 My point was that you cannot base someone'se inelligence on one breif, satirical comment.
buttface112211 9 months ago
@giska1000 Intelligent Design is not a scientific theory, as many would like to claim, it was deemed not scientific in the court of law in the Kitzmiller v. Dover case. It is not even a testable hypothesis, and no experiments can be conducted to evaluate or validate the hypothesis.
buttface112211 9 months ago
@buttface112211 umm...yes it is...i as an evolutionist who defended evolution until i graduated got BSc and MSc degrees in (biology,microbiology,biochemistry and genetics-molekularna biologija) and diplomas in philosophy and hisrtory....THEN...i left darwinism...just like more and more europeans here do today....because darwinism is AGAINST everything..EVERYTHING we observe today including natural selection,mutation and ,,survival of the fittest,, hypothesis...
giska1000 9 months ago
@buttface112211 and lets just mention that Intelligent Design is testable hypothesis...darwinian theory is not...and who ever told you so lied you...especially when it comes to molecular biology and fossil record....evolution is comoletely wrong theory just like geocentrism was up until 17th century when few scientists actually proposed new theory...and they were called lunatics also and heliocentrism was called ,,pseudoscience,, ...unscientific ..etc..but look at heliocentrism now....
giska1000 9 months ago
@giska1000 The theory of Evolution is a testable hypothesis, hense why it was promoted to a theory, and the scientific definition of the term theory is different than its everyday use. Evolution has been observed in various insects and microorganisms under labratory conditions. Perhaps you can point to a legitimate source that clearly explains how molecular biology and the fossil record contradict the theory of evolution. The fossil record does not contradict evolution as far as I'm aware.
buttface112211 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@buttface112211 The theory of Evolution is a testable hypothesis, hense why it was promoted to a theory
....umm..are you sure about that mister buttface??give me one..JUST ONE...such test??? Evolution has been observed in various insects and microorganisms under labratory conditions.
..ummm...give me names of at least one of these organismssir???
giska1000 9 months ago
@buttface112211 Perhaps you can point to a legitimate source that clearly explains how molecular biology and the fossil record contradict the theory of evolution. The fossil record does not contradict evolution as far as I'm aware.
..well..as far as yo are NOT aware....but we ll come to this subject..(including dating methods too) after you answer my previous questions ...:)))
giska1000 9 months ago
@giska1000 You never asked any questions.
buttface112211 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@buttface112211 The theory of Evolution is a testable hypothesis, hense why it was promoted to a theory
....umm..are you sure about that mister buttface??give me one..JUST ONE...such test???
Evolution has been observed in various insects and microorganisms under labratory conditions.
..ummm...give me names of at least one of these organismssir???
...well...i believe i did...so...answer my questions good sir =??
giska1000 9 months ago
@giska1000 soft tissue was found in dinosaur bones.
ItssBrian 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ItssBrian "soft tissue was found in dinosaur bones" Here's an article that discusses that finding, and also includes links to discussions on how creationists have distorted similar research in the past.
tinyurlDOTcom/9ddkh
ArcanaKnight 8 months ago
@giska1000 You obviously lied about those credentials becuase you evidently lack the proper education to distinguish theory from hypothesis. A hypothesis is an idea that is yet to acquire any evidence and experimentation to observe and verify the hypothesis. Even if evolution is wrong, that does not make Intelligent Design correct, if it did, then that is a logical fallacy. Intelligent Design can not be tested in labratory conditions, it is not science, it is a rebranding of creationism.
buttface112211 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@buttface112211 You obviously lied about those credentials becuase you evidently lack the proper education to distinguish theory from hypothesis.
...ehhh..sir..why dont you just go to answering my questions and we ll see later who is liar and who isnt...:))))
giska1000 9 months ago
Hieroglyphics prove creationism/Intelligent Design?
buttface112211 9 months ago
"Ratings have been diabled for this video". Oh naturally.
luvdomus 9 months ago
oh look creationist propaganda with disabled ratings
aarhallenbeck 10 months ago
@aarhallenbeck AHHH!!! I cant click "thumbs up" to your comment :-p
aaron2414 9 months ago
@aarhallenbeck How could some of the scientists permit themselves to make a claim that would necessitate knowledge as extensive as the scheme of the universe, when their knowledge of the total scheme of being is *close* to zero, when confronted with a whole mass of unknowns concerning this very earth and tangible, lifeless matter, let alone the whole universe?
1tabligh 9 months ago
@1tabligh I don't know what "claim" you're talking about, but I'm going to go ahead and assume you're talking about the claim that CREATIONISTS make; rejected by most scientists, because of lack of evidence. Scientists only "permit themselves to make a claim" when they have a pretty damn good reason to, because they are the ones that are actually looking for the answers and have the evidence to back up those claims. Also, don't accuse people of deluding themselves until you get an education.
aarhallenbeck 9 months ago
@aarhallenbeck Do scientific discoveries and knowledge cause such a scientist to conclude that matter, *** unknowing and unperceiving ***, is his creator and that of all beings?
1tabligh 9 months ago
@1tabligh Whatever question you are trying to ask is ambiguous, meaningless, and irrelevant to any form coherent argument. We are made of matter, yes. Is matter our "creator"? Completely meaningless.
aarhallenbeck 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@aarhallenbeck How can it be supposed that belief in the existence of God is the acceptance of contradiction, whereas belief in the uncaused nature of an effect such as matter is not contradictory?
How could it be believed that matter should itself be the origin of millions of attributes and characteristics and thus be the equivalent of the purposeful, wise and all-knowing Creator?
1tabligh 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Then how can the atheists and some of the scientists delude themselve and believe that hydrogen and oxygen, electrons and protons, should first produce themselves, then be the source for all other beings, and finally decree the laws that regulate themselves and the rest of the material world?
1tabligh 9 months ago
what a fucking joke.. get a clue fuckin dumb ass
azoverclocked 10 months ago
Funny video :D
KeistasZmogelis 10 months ago
1. What the is a "Philosopher of Biology?" Sounds like a poser to me...
2. Old Man of the Mountain <- Not designed, but looks like a HUMAN FACE
3. Complexity does not imply design. Ever.
4. Evolution is not a byproduct of chance.
5. Information does not imply design. The structure of a galaxy is information rich, but no design is needed to create the structure.
Fake science is easy to debunk, because peer review doesn't exist in the ID community.
dusktreader13 10 months ago
@dusktreader13 to give or get information you have to have intelligence right ? for information to be created there had to be a designer.information just does not create its self that ia impossible.
shannon123933 10 months ago
@shannon123933
"to give or get information" - You really need to be more specific than this. And, no, complexity does not require design. There are many examples in science and math of complex structures that arise from entities interacting based upon simple local rules. In evolution, these local rules change on the basis of small increments of random mutation, the *minority* of which are beneficial and become new inherited traits. This is emergent complexity, and it is self-creating.
dusktreader13 10 months ago
Our ability to infere "design" is completely flawed. That's why ID is not science! The first thing we learn in science is that our senses DECEIVE us most of the time! I can show you a lot of pictures, scultures, etc, wich seem perfectly designed for some purpose, like simetric patterns wich "works" like flor decorations, and wich every artist will say they were designed for that purpose, but instead they were produced only due NATURE'S LAWS. No goal, no design. Only one fact falsifies a sentence
anonimoculto 10 months ago
This video is talking about objects that are not alive . These were stupid examples . This video just explains that the maker of the video does not understand evolution .
bonnevie9 10 months ago
Part 5's missing, just sayin.
boner2008 11 months ago
Small probability + detection = design?, What a crock of s*^t.
There is no product of intelligence, Flagellants and protein type bio-molecular organisms ARE self encoding replicating software which stem from naturalistic evolution, not intelligent design, its been proven kiddies.
exiledregiment 11 months ago
@exiledregiment very succinct answer. Of course, we are answering to people that deal in massive generalities and magic compensating for ignorance....
dusktreader13 10 months ago
Ugh.... discovery institute and intelligent design.... Hmmmm not a religious organization. Please someone tell me what designer can create all life on the planet ? It either goes to time traveler, aliens, or god. If youre going to fart in my face don't try to cover it up with some big words to make it seem like its not just a pile of shit.
braedencowbrough 11 months ago
I love that stephen meyers puts human intelligence on the exact same level as the god he believes in. Kind of interesting. Object recognition by us is not any proof of intelligence outside ourselves, simply that we are intelligent enough to recognize an object that another human has made.
Mekiwyn 11 months ago
I just now found this channel and, behold, fewovercomers is here. How did I notice so quickly?
1. ALL CAPS
2. Quoting scripture.
3. Acting Stupid.
4. Actually is stupid.
Same as he is on the other channels.
scienceandmusiclover 11 months ago
intellegent design does not have to mean god. life on earth could have been formed by nano bots from an intellegent civilization. their universe was dieing. so they sent their genetic code into our young universe using nano bots. those bots wouldhave then recreated their civilization and we might be justthat. look up michio kaku to learn more.
nannynicky4life 1 year ago
@nannynicky4life Its true that it doesn't HAVE to mean that, but the vast majority of ID proponents see the supposed Designer to mean only one thing (god); the nebulous language of ID was purposely done for the sole reason of getting around the restriction of teaching creationism in school.
ArcanaKnight 1 year ago
@nannynicky4life intellegent design does not have to mean god.
_____
Absolutely nonsense!
Absurdity of Atheism!
If abiogenesis spontaneous creation *without* specific "design" can be admitted under such conditions of regularity, then purposeful generation and definitely balanced creation can be the result of *error* ad perplexity, since these two are *opposed* to abiogenesis.
1tabligh 1 year ago
@1tabligh Spontaneous generation is not opposed to abiogenesis you sub-human garbage, the two are mutually exclusive, abiogenesis doesn't explain conditions of regularity or its spontaneous evolution ( not creation )
If the first protein was created it wouldn't be balanced , because if it was, there would be no need to evolve, use your brain, and think before you use pseudo intellectualism to prove how scientifically smart you are
exiledregiment 11 months ago
Such a statement is highly *absurd* that order and rectitude should come about *without* a Creator, and disorder and impropriety of "design" and *fate* should suppose a Creator. He is an *ignoramus* who says this, because anything produced *without* "design" will ***never*** be exact and proportioned, while disorder and contrariness cannot co-exist with orderly design. God is far above what the *deluded and duped ignorant atheists* say.
All praise is due to ALLAH, the Lord of the Universe.
1tabligh 1 year ago
@1tabligh If fate opposed the creator, then why does your allah or "god" have a plan for everyone?, And yes metabolic organisms can rise from non living organisms you need to educate yourself before you mix bullshit analogys like god and science in the same sentence, Do you know what a membrane is?, All the " Tools " that cells need to operate and function are passed on through natural selection and variation with time and genetic drift, god plays no part in the equation, educate yourself.
~mk
exiledregiment 11 months ago
@exiledregiment The Need of the World for One Without Need!
The principle of causality is a general and universal law and foundation for all efforts of man, both in the acquisition of knowledge and in his customary activities. The strivings of scholars to uncover the cause of every phenomenon, whether natural or social, arise from the belief that no phenomenon originates in and of itself without the intervention of causes and agents.
1tabligh 11 months ago
bullshit
TheNumber77Studios 1 year ago
g24417, You MOCK, SCOFF and LAUGH AT GOD NOW, BUT GOD WILL HAVE The LAST LAUGH ON You, IN The NEAR FUTURE!/ PSALM 1:4 HE (GOD) THAT SITTETH IN The HEAVENS SHALL LAUGH: The LORD SHALL HAVE Them (HEATHENS, Atheists) IN DERISION (SPEAKING UNINTELLIGIBLY, IN CONFUSION)! PROVERBS 1:26 ,29 I (GOD) ALSO WILL LAUGH AT Your (HEATHEN'S, Atheist's) CALAMITY; I WILL MOCK WHEN Your FEAR COMETH; - FOR THAT They HATED KNOWLEDGE (HATED TRUTH), and DID NOT CHOOSE The FEAR (LOVE & REVERENCE) Of The LORD;
fewovercomers 1 year ago
@fewovercomers blah blah blah blah-dy blah blah... the only people ''speaking unintelligibly'' are odd-bods like yourself. Your bronze-age threats of ''God's Wrathful Judgement'' are genuinely embarrassing. You don't speak for God, you pompous little tit. You're just some angry sad-sack with an old book and no education in anything newer than 400AD.
You're a dinosaur, so we're going to put you in a museum. And it is WE who will laugh at YOU. Jesus is dead, bucko. Enjoy.
USERNAMEfieldempty 1 year ago
@USERNAMEfieldempty, I Don't Have To Speak For ALMIGHTY GOD, HE SPEAKS FOR HIMSELF, and HE SOON WILL BE IN Your HEATHEN FACE SPEAKING TO You, and Your WEAK Little Knees Will BOW TO GOD!/ ROMANS 14:11 FOR IT IS WRITTEN, AS I LIVE, SAITH The LORD, EVERY KNEE SHALL BOW TO ME, and EVERY TONGUE SHALL CONFESS TO GOD!
fewovercomers 1 year ago
@fewovercomers I and billions like me are above the judgement of your god.
testtubekitten 1 year ago
@testtubekitten, There Is NOTHING That You or Anyone Else Can Do To Stop GOD'S GREAT WHITE THRONE JUDGMENT Of ALL SOULS AT The END Of The TRUE JESUS CHRIST'S THOUSAND YEAR REIGN ON EARTH, IN The NEAR FUTURE! REVELATION 20:11 ,13 And I SAW a GREAT WHITE THRONE, and HIM (GOD) THAT SAT ON IT, FROM WHOSE FACE The EARTH and The HEAVEN (THIS 2nd EARTH & HEAVEN AGE) FLED AWAY; and THERE WAS FOUND NO PLACE FOR Them! --:and They WERE JUDGED EVERY Man (EVERY SOUL) ACCORDING TO Their WORKS!/ See You There!
fewovercomers 1 year ago
@fewovercomers All those voices in your head shouting for wrath and judgement are not 'God'. They're schizophrenia.
You are not a doomsday prophet, you're a really scary little internet loony. Have a nice day.
USERNAMEfieldempty 1 year ago
@USERNAMEfieldempty, What Makes You Think That ALL Of GOD'S JUDGMENTS ARE DOOM, GOD'S JUDGMENTS UPON HIS FAITHFUL and WISE SERVANTS ARE BLESSINGS, LOVE & ETERNAL LIFE, ONLY GOD'S ENEMIES HAVE SOMETHING TO FEAR! Are You One of GOD'S ENEMIES?/ JAMES 4:4 Ye ADULTERERS (MALE IDOLATERS) and ADULTERESSES (FEMALE IDOLATERS), KNOW Ye NOT THAT The FREINDSHIP Of The WORLD (The WORLD HATES GOD) IS ENMITY (a HATEFUL ENEMY) WITH GOD? WHOSOEVER THEREFORE WILL BE a FRIEND Of The WORLD IS The ENEMY Of GOD!
fewovercomers 1 year ago
@fewovercomers
Why do I get the feeling I'm going to see you on the front page one day with a head-line along the lines of. '' 'I Did It For God' says NightClub Massacre Gun-man.''
USERNAMEfieldempty 1 year ago
@USERNAMEfieldempty, You Ask Why Do You Get That Feeling? Because Your Feelings Are EASILY DECEIVED IN Your STRONG DELUSION Of LOVING and BELIEVING IN LIES, RATHER THAN RECEIVING The LOVE Of The TRUTH, THAT You MIGHT BE SAVED!/ 2 THESSALONIANS 2:10 And WITH ALL DECEIBABLENESS Of UNRIGHTEOUSNESS IN Them THAT PERISH; BECAUSE They RECEIVED NOT The LOVE Of The TRUTH, THAT Thy MIGHT BE SAVED! And FOR THIS CAUSE GOD SHALL SEND Them STRONG DELUSION, THAT They SHOULD BELIEVE a LIE:/ You Are DELUSIONAL!
fewovercomers 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@fewovercomers God is a lie, your own words: " Your Feelings Are EASILY DECEIVED IN Your STRONG DELUSION Of LOVING and BELIEVING IN LIES, RATHER THAN RECEIVING The LOVE Of The TRUTH"
Mekiwyn 11 months ago
@USERNAMEfieldempty, The "I AM THAT I AM", The GOD Of ABRAHAM, ISAAC, JACOB (ISRAEL), MOSES, ALL Of The PROPHETS and APOSTLES Of The OVER 3,500 YEAR OLD HOLY BIBLE, and Of ALL TRUE CHRISTIANS, Will Have To Teach You GOD'S TRUTH DURING The TRUE JESUS CHRIST'S MILLENNIUM REIGN ON EARTH!/ REVELATION 20:6 BLESSED and HOLY IS He THAT HATH PART IN The FIRST RESURRECTION: ON SUCH The SECOND DEATH HATH NO POWER, BUT They SHALL BE PRIESTS Of GOD and Of CHRIST, and SHALL REIGN WITH HIM a THOUSAND YEARS!
fewovercomers 1 year ago
@fewovercomers Is your Caps Lock key working properly?
Your SHOUTING and STREET-PREACHING are mildly amusing, but far for convincing. You're coming off as a swivel-eyed loon, do you know that? LOUD does not equal right, it equals angry.
USERNAMEfieldempty 1 year ago
@USERNAMEfieldempty, Is That Why You Use CAPS In Your Username " USERNAMEfieldempty", You LOONY HYPOCRITE?
fewovercomers 1 year ago
@fewovercomers GOD CAN SUCK MY DICK!?!
skubersteve24 11 months ago
not even a actual thumprint, a real thumprint of god himself found on a human cell would be proof of intelligence. It just doesn't follow the scientific method. You'd have to then look up the the owner of that thumprint, interview him and have him demonstrate how he can create things out of thin air in front of a panel. anything short of that is human interpretation, a leap to conclusion. NOT EVIDENCE.
Hermy1138 1 year ago
I think my favorite sign of intelligent design is the image of Jesus on the dogs ass. Everyone kiss Jesus!
g24417 1 year ago
Living things are designed by evolution. We know that natural processes can design complex things, because humans design things, and the human mind is produced by the brain, and the function of the brain is a natural process - i.e., chemical and electrical.
Vincentaneous 1 year ago
@Vincentaneous, You Can NOT PROVE That There Is Evolution of Species, NOR PROVE That So Called "Evolution of Species" Can Design Anything, Because Evolution of Species Is a LIE & JUNK SCIENCE, and IS NOT OBSERVABLE NATURAL PHENOMENA, It Is Only a Figment Of Your Falsely Indoctrinated Imagination!
fewovercomers 1 year ago