AIDS Hoax-10 reasons HIV is not the cause of AIDS 11 Comment

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

Why do people resort to making ad hominem attacks? Because they can’t win an argument on the merits of their case. Frustrated and infuriated, the believers lash out at those who reveal that their Emperor is nude. AIDStruthers can’t cite a set of specific publications to prove that “HIV” tests detect active infection, and they can’t cite a set of specific publications to prove that “HIV” causes AIDS; so they try to “kill the messengers” who bring these facts to public attention.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

Google.....Kalichman disclaims and makes AD HOMONYM attacks (Does illiteracy matter? — Kalichman’s Komical Kaper #9)

"What’s really wrong with resorting to ad hominem statements — personal attacks on people you disagree with — isn’t that they’re uncivil... it’s that they are IRRELEVANT to the subject under discussion. It’s a fact of human life that some people whose behavior might be widely regarded as despicable can nevertheless be correct about matters of fact, or science...or anything else"

[therealadvocate]

I'm here to point out that those who believe these theories are ALWAYS hostile, abusive and are obviously very angry at the world around them. Second, they are most usually anonymous and do nothing more about these things they claim to care so much about beyond anonymous Internet socializing and propaganda. Oh, and vulgar abuse.

I would like anyone who is considering this debate to keep that in mind when deciding what to believe.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@therealadvocate LIAR! You are "projecting" You also censor your channel.

It's the Minustry of Aidstruth groupies who always resort to personal attack. WHy is that?

[therealadvocate]

@mykoolaidtastesfunny You are a prime example of what I speak of. Your perception that I am attacking you is proof of your paranoia and generally confused state of consciousness.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@therealadvocate Honey....playing Dr Phil with skeptics is NOT a Gold Standard for Gallo's crap antibody tests.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

"At present (2011) there is no recognized standard for establishing the presence or absence of HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibody in human blood"

HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS TYPES 1 AND 2: (E. COLI, B. MEGATERIUM, RECOMBINANT ANTIGEN)

HIVABTM HIV-1/HIV-2 (rDNA) EIA

I have the direct links to the test kit disclaimers on my channel.

[jacski7]

Love it how they blame losing their funding. I for one can't see scientists chasing flying bigs for funding. If they solve the cure for aids the will move onto cancer or something else and get funding for that. These people are whack

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@jacski7 So.....WHO do they get their funding from? Who wants to hire an expert in a virus of mass destruction with no VMD? What makes you think immunology and cancer are the same fields where people can just swap their jobs around?

Google.....TONY FAUCI'S BANKROLL

Fauci is the guy who decides who does and does not get Gov. funding. Lol...Oh look...he saved the biggest checks for HIMSELF. Ha...andwith absolutely nothing to show for it.

[johnlovesbridge]

Oh jeez, I thought I might have been learning something until I saw this section. Paranoid, homophobic, conspiracy theory....

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@johnlovesbridge How is blaming the medical establishment for not giving out correct information "homophobic" or "paranoid"?

[WillSee11]

@johnlovesbridge You have to realize that getting inside any social group, be it the gay community or conservative Christians is the true agenda behind AID$ Inc. No one questions the science, they just identify with the group think, be it more funding and government support with gays, or more FEAR and dread of the "HIV virus" with Sunday School kids. Either way Big Pharma wins and AID$ inc. gets more funding and tax dollars. Fear is the means of manipulating the public.

[bissia]

@johnlovesbridge You obviously didn't understood what a part of this doc tells (see 03:00 i.e.)

[Allen10579]

I've had a shit load of partners myself, plus I've done every drug on the fucking planet and I'm clean... But I Still believe this is sexually transmitted

[TheHolyMongolEmpire]

@Allen10579

Use a condom!

[Allen10579]

@TheHolyMongolEmpire for sure man, especially in these day's, you have to wear one,. I've goten a few stocked up now lol

[dirtydonki]

I've shagged everything under the sun and never so much as a cold.

There is no HIV virus!

DON'T DO DRUGS!!!

[berlin45ers]

@dirtydonki OMG even Hillary Clinton ???LOL

[berlin45ers]

@dirtydonki OMG even Hillary Clinton ???LOL

[dirtydonki]

@berlin45ers How the hell did you find out? :)

[uxoruxoris]

@dirtydonki funny most sti are symptom free. Will you all boycott syphilis, gonorrhoea, chlamydia, hpv (the cause of all cervical cancer).

[Allen10579]

@dirtydonki ya ok, one of these days you wont be so god damn lucky there dirty. that's a promise, And to be honest, for you to be here saying "There is no HIV virus" and in the next breath "DONT DO DRUGS", well news flash, you shouldn't be giving advice to anyone let alone kids, And just because you've shagged everything under the sun and haven't caught a cold, that dont mean shit,

[dirtydonki]

@Allen10579 You must have trolled all through the comments just to bite my poor ass you sad sheeplike person. Do some research. The truth is out there and will set you free.

As for me I've been at it since the 70's and still going strong. The HIV - AID's is a BIG lie.

Yes, don't do drugs especially not antibiotics nor Poppers. FACT: They kill your immunity.

You can trust me, I am a Doctor. :) LMFAO.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@Allen10579 "Hiv"? You mean the cellular crap Gallo "discovered"?

[RDpapichulo]

LOL I started realizing aids was a hoaks when I ask all my sexually active friends with over 50 partners if they have aids. They always say no. Look healthy and live perfectly fine.

[dharmanova]

@RDpapichulo this approach is called "anecdotal evidence" in science...

[berlin45ers]

@RDpapichulo hmm

[TheHolyMongolEmpire]

@RDpapichulo

Dumbass, you can have sex with 3000 people and never get it, you can fuck the wrong person and get it from just one time. The chances of getting HIV from one sexual act is not very much. You can fuck someone without a condom who is HIV+ and not get it, the likelihood of getting it with someone who is positive, is 1/500 chance. Use your head, dont be a dumbass.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@TheHolyMongolEmpire The correct answer is ZERO seroconversions in 10 YEARS worth of *****

"“We followed up 175 HIV-discordant couples [one partner tests positive, one negative] over time… No transmission occurred among the 25% of couples who did not use their condoms consistently, nor among the 47 couples who intermittently practiced unsafe sex during the entire duration of follow-up…”

“We observed no seroconversions after entry into the study [nobody became HIV positive]

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@TheHolyMongolEmpire Google......THE PADIAN WAFFLE....for a direct link to the Padian Study

Also google.....There Will Be No Heterosexual AIDS Epidemic, Experts Admit

"It is official: Aids is not explicable by sexual transmission. There is no heterosexual Aids pandemic, and further, there will be no heterosexual Aids pandemic....the World Health Organization: “[T]here will be no generalised epidemic of Aids in the heterosexual population outside Africa.”

[121omePiet]

I wonder if there is a documantairy now from this time and that is not 14 years old.

How do we see all this in 2009?

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

There is another one out now making the film festival circuit....House of Numbers....check it out.

For more recent documentaries I suggest ..."Deconstructing the Myth of Aids" or "Aids Inc" which is an updated version of Deconstructing and came out in I think 2007

[121omePiet]

thank you

[rpdigital17]

There is a new movie about this thread coming out pretty soon. It is called "House of numbers". You can watch the trailer from houseofnumbers-dot-com.