Talk about a massive let down. You would think Palast of all people would have a firm grasp and understanding of the 911 fraud. Evidently not. Very, very disappointing.
There is absolutely no evidence - that's because they shipped the rubble away and buried it somewhere! Do we then take this guy's standpoint and accept the official story?
No evidence? - that's because they didn't release video footage and confiscated video footage of the Pentagon explosion. Do we then accept the official story??
No evidence? - that's because .... that's because ....False 9/11 Commission.....
Fuck Palast and Chomsky! The don't deserve respect!
Have you ever noticed that many of the left gatekeepers who are afraid to speak honestly about 9/11 happen to be jewish? Greg Palast, Amy Goodman, Naomi Klein, Howard Zinn, Noam Chomsky -- they are all jewish and they are all conspicuously evasive when questioned about 9/11.
That's because Israel did 9/11.
Watch "9/11 Missing Links" to get the dirty details.
well, greg, you missed the boat on this one. AE 911 for truth about 911 proves to a certainty that controlled demolition was the means used to drop wtc 1 and 2. for an investigative reporting your stock has gone down a few points for this idiotic statement.
@ole9421 - you are so fucking PARANOID dude. He just disagrees with you. You can call him dumb (but how smart are you?) You can call him misled (that's a debate worth having). But saying "they got to him too" is just TOO DUMB!!
Q: Who precisely "got to him too"? Who? Q: When? Q: Where is your proof - payments to his accounts? Video evidence of "them" meeting? THESE ARE THE QUESTIONS THAT JOURNALISTS DEMAND ANSWERS TO. Where is YOUR precise evidence that "they got to him too"?
None of us know what the fuck happened on 911 for sure.......other than the towers are no longer there. We lost near 60 thousand ppl. of US lives in Vietnam........over a fake attack. And the list is long. I know I cant do a dang thing about it. BUT.....the stories sure are fun to listen to.
Another smiling Jew assisting in the cover-up. It shows how the Jews 'play both sides' first with a Rabbi on Bush's lap, and then throwing him under the bus while they elevate Rahm Emanuel (a Mossad agent) to the number 2 man behind their puppet Obumma.
Well he works for the BBC so what would you expect him to say? As far as expert opinion goes, are Richard Gage and the 1000 or so Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth also "fruitcakes"? How could anyone look at the footage of building 7 falling and say it's not a controlled demolition? Gimme a break...
Palast loves to play the smart good left vs bad bad right. He will never ever ever say bad things about Dems and hence he is corrupt. I've seen his type. It's not original. Sure he sounds fun and funny but he ain't telling you the whole truth and outright lies. So you can't trust him.
Listen to his words. It's always Repub bad bad bad. Dems are the savior. What a load of crock. They're all bad, except a few like Ron Paul.
Friday, 29 november 2009, 9:00 pm, -- 9/11 Truth on CBC's news documentary THE FIFTH ESTATE. It's Canada's "60 Minutes". Come to my channel for details.
I respect Creg honestly but you cant rule out stuff without looking into these theories man. And by the way you talk Creg I can tell you havent really comprehended the arguments that pinpoint towards controlled demolition.
yes, greg palace in this instance 'doth protest too much'...
this goes to show that where integrity and misplaced loyalties collide, sadly even the most intelligent and generally benevolent people can be downright corrupt; too bad this can then cast doubt on their otherwise mostly excellent work.
Strange guy, calling Jones a "fruit cake". Mabe all his is just another controlled opposition media reporter. If you don't trust the national media, go to palast. I suspect his working for the same people who run the phoney democracy in the US.
He probably knows what went down on sept11. Just like Chomsky, is covering it up. Notice that they are both Jewish. So called rebel intellectuals and rebel reports and even Alex Jones, i believe are taking people for a ride.
Do not believe a word this man says he is a disinfo agent.......as of todays date may 09 655 architects and engineers have called for a new investigation into WTC collapse...watch their excellent video on youtube called "blueprint for truth".
Palast is too much of a wuss to say what he thinks- which is, "shut up, you tin-foil hat wearing conspiracy a-hole. There is no massive 9-11 conspiracy!"
I do not think it is right to attack Pallast on the basis of his Jewish heritage. He is an honest and good journalist, just listen to what he is saying it makes sense. The anti-semetic comments are insane. Stiglitz is the one who costed the whole $3trillion bill for the Iraq war.
"Chicago is a Zionist hotspot and Greg Palast is the son of one of Chicago's leading Zionist families. This is why he is so dedicated to diverting attention from the evidence of the Zionist involvement in 9-11"
"Greg Palast is the product of a Chicago-based Russian Yiddish immigrant family which married into a immigrant Hungarian Jewish family. He contributes to the British press, the well known left-leaning outlets who adamantly refuse to look at the evidence from 9-11."
"A year later, Palast came to my attention when he penned a badly-written article entitled "Was the Invasion of Iraq a Jewish Conspiracy" for the Jewish periodical Tikkun. Although Palast's logic and writing are weak, he comes on strongly as a Zionist apologist."
I don't know he has a point. It would be easier just to let it happen. All this stuff is theories so you shouldn't really put your weight on theories. I have seen videos saying its a controlled demolition and evidence disproving it as well.
If palast was covering news at the time of Hitler's rise and saw the richstag fire as something he didn't look fully into I would call that naive. Actually beyond naive. He needs to do more research, and beyond that, open his mind on this issue. I'm not a structural engineer either but I have an understanding because of more than just the demolitions, because of the startling number of inconsistencies that exist! You don't need to be a scientist of any kind to figure this one out!
Palast as a Structural Engineer didn't investigate it. Anyway, he has been VERY busy doing 20 other things - why pick on him for not being another 9/11 expert?
Lenny kept pushing to hear his buddy say what he wanted him to say, so that's when Palast started attacking Jones (or his provably whacko Moron religion. Before the name morphed into Moroni, it was written down as MORON).
Palast's contemporary (and fellow Jew); Michael Moore's Agent is none other than Michael Chertoff's cousin.
This comes out of the mouth of a man who works for a Broadcast system that actually reported the fall of WTC7 while it was still standing.He is right on target in many of his reports but this one he has not done enoug research or has been instructed not to.He as right about 1 thing the WTC's were not taken down b dynamite,it was Thermite.A shame he has sold out on this issue. I suspect Britan has some inside involvement in this and he was warned not to dig to deep. Onr thing for sure,inside job.
The interviewer asks Palast: "Do you believe that those two planes took down three World Trade Center towers?" He basically answers that he hasn't fully investigated the question, but he DOES know it wasn't controlled demolition. I see nothing inconsistent about that.
greg palast is a muckraker from london.he will tell it 10 different ways for publicity,to sell his books.i'm surprised that he didn't find some way to agree with the 911 ct. ask yourself why he's always got his nose stuck in our business. why does he not stay in his own country and report about what's going on in london? could it be they are tired of his bs and ignore him. or has he stepped on too many toes with his spins?
Come on Greg, Steven Jones is not a fruitcake, he's just a Mormon, so he believes some weird stuff about Jesus. I mean even weirder than most Christians.
Molten metal for 4 weeks on all 3 buildings. Explain that. Thermate not dynamite.
Larry Silverstien ' Let's Pull It!!
Police telling people to get back the building is about to blow up minutes before #7 was imploded. Now, how would the police know a building is going to blow up and the exact time.
Palast is a zionist shill, a gatekeeper, he will denounce Bush, Big Oil, and so on but he's not going to point things that might make inside job plausible (since 911 was Mossad+MIC/CIA job)
Atta's mint passport (yea right)
Odigo (Israeli corp) text warning
The Israelis arrested by GW Bridge with explosives and the Moving company
WTC7
The exercices Vigilant Guardian, Amalgam Virgo, etc
Cheney changing interception Protocol 2 months before 911
i'm lost---wtc 7 was "pulled" according to words out of silvierstein's own mouth. if it takes months to wire buildings then someone was wiring building 7 prior to the attacks. why? shame on palast. he usually is so reasonable. he seems scared to state the obvious.
9/11 was allowed to happen. But you need to get these imposters in court for engineering Bush winning the last two elections. Once you have the scumbag in prison along with his fellow thieves then you can investigate 9/11 again properly.
I'm sorry you're mistaken. Bush Never won the first election in 2000, much less the 2nd, he was SELECTED by the supreme court. You'll need to see the documentary "Counting on democracy" with Greg Palast. where he uncovered the voter fraud in Florida by Jeb Bush Katherine Harris and DBT,a subsidiary of Choice Point which was run by John Poindexter, Iran Contra felon. Also tied to the bushes.GWB was SELECTED, not Elected. something you should never forget.we voted and they just took it away...
@Sofedup So Al Gore calls for a recount in 3 heavily democratic counties in FLA, can't find enough votes to win in the legal 7 day window that FLA law allows for and that means he won?
Further, this video suggests the dishonest of the theorists. Think about it. How come the _only_ acceptable theory amongst the theorists is that the towers were a controlled demolition? Why not explore the Bush-in-league-with-Osama angle? Bush did, after all, leave Saudi Arabia just like Osama wanted him to (though not because of the Towers, but still, you could make the argument). The conspiracy theorists shut down anyone who has an alternative theory, just like the Bush administration.
Palast did not contradict himself. If you investigate a theory and find no evidence supporting that theory you cannot report on that theory -- you'll have nothing to say. Did the person who made this video fail to understand logic or grammar? Palast looked into the controlled demolition issue, found nothing to support it, and said as much.
"Controlled demolition I can rule out." Because you're an idiot and you don't have all the facts: Evidence of thermite used to melt the steel of the towers-Evidence of shape charges used to disrupt the foundation of the towers-jet fuel can't melt steel-the towers fell at free fall speed and not approximately 45 seconds that it would have taken if the floors collapsed one atop another-dozens of witnesses reporting explosions after the planes had already hit. Don't believe this jackass.
i agree with you brother...but this guy is no idiot he is one of the best investigators out there..he is just saying it as he sees it...sometimes we dont like what he sees...but he is an good man...how ever it happened..
when you look at how many people made money off the attacks...with put-options for american and united stock to drop... its safe to say ..9/11 inside job.
I do think that 9/11 was an inside job, 'MIHOP' style, as coined by Webster Tarpley... and I think Greg Palast should check out Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.
However, Palast has done plenty of good, solid investigative reporting on Bush crimes, New Orleans, the oil companies and other important stories... reaching people who wouldn't otherwise consider themselves conspiracy believers. So what if he doesn't believe 9/11 was an inside job, if you believe it you don't need him to agree.
I do think that 9/11 was an inside job, 'MIHOP' style, as coined by Webster Tarpley... and I think Greg Palast should check out Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.
However, Palast has done plenty of good, solid investigative reporting on Bush crimes, New Orleans, the oil companies and other important stories... reaching people who wouldn't otherwise consider themselves conspiracy believers. So what if he doesn't believe 9/11 was an inside job, if you believe it you don't need him to agree.
The more I watch this video, the more I believe Greg is trying to cover his butt. He's CLEARLY contradicting himself. First he declares he is NOT an expert and hasn't investigated it, then he's magically enough of an expert to completely discredit Dr. Jones AND COMPLETELY rule out controlled demolition?? He also says there were NO EXPERTS/ENGINEERS involved....uh...don't like Dr. Jones? Then how 'bout Jeff King from MIT?? Again, we don't have all the answers, but we sure got HOLES...
Most of us in the general public, myself included, are NOT experts in the fields necessary to properly evaluate the physics and other forensic aspects. This is why our government's mishandling of the whole 911 event, before, during, and AFTER the fact is so important. In fact, until and unless our elected officials can come through with a full-scale, impartial, and uncensored investigation on 911, I consider the entire Bush Administration guilty of TREASON by reason of WILLFUL FAILURE TO ACT .
Bottom line: Without question...the Bush Administration is 100%, flat out TOTALLY RESPONSIBLE for the death and destruction of 911, and particularly the after-effects since then including the deaths of our service men/women and tens of thousands of innocent Iraqi citizens.
The ONLY question which really needs to be answered is whether or not they were GROSSLY INCOMPETENCE on a GALACTIC MAGNITUDE, were the WILLFULLY BLIND BENEFACTORS, or the TREASONOUS CREATORS...it's all the same to ME.
Here's the 911 problem as I see it. We certainly don't know all the details, but I believe we know enough to know that the OFFICIAL story has some serious holes that demand an explanation. This was a MAJOR CRIME and our elected officials have a responsibility to all AMERICANS to do everything within their power to #1. Provide a FULL and UNCENSORED investigation as to what happened. This should be JOB 1. It was swept under the rug and whitewashed, which ALONE breeds more conspiracy theories.
WTF is he talking about? The towers were obviously blown up. Anyone can see mid way through the collapse the towers exploding. And you can even see debris going up before going down creating this palm tree effect. How can 2 planes destroy 3 building completely. 2x 110 floor + 1x 47 floor completely eradicated. You need a lot of power to do that and planes and fires are just not enough.
He's done some great work before that, but he's way off on this one.
Palast is squirming like a Fox News Anchor. Wow. This is really an eye-opening video. What the hell is wrong with this guy? He tells it like it is most of the time, and then when it comes to the really big issues like 9/11, he turns into an emotional bumbling idiot. Remarkable how similar this phenomenon is to that of Noam Chomsky, Matt Rothschild, and other "leaders" of the left. Better check and see how much money these guys are getting from the Ford Foundation and other CIA fronts.
If Greg Palast gives in to these nonsensical, sensationalist, conspiracy theories, than his credibility to do the real work--you should be praising him for--is demolished.
He has done his best to expose a lot of wrong doing in this country, and by this governamnet. You ought to have respect for him.
Andrew Evans (BBC journalist) was in WTC lobby on 9/11. He heard no planes, saw no planes but moments later described three or four huge explosions at ground level. Whilst Greg Palast may be intent on exposing the truth about the Bush/Bin Laden connection, why is he ignoring the testimony of one of the most reliable witnesses and colleagues?
Explosions at ground level are not verified by damage. Nobody who left or entered the building after the planes hit reported any damage at ground level. No damage=no bombs OR explosions before the planes hit. What part of this equation don't you 9-11 truthers get?
So you're saying that the lobby windows being blown out and the marble being blown off the lobby walls and the basement being blown out and the steel being cut at 45 degree angles from cutting charges in the basement and testimony from firemen and reliable journalists is no proof then? Oh I see, just as long as you know what you're talking about. What is it you 911 liars don't get?
How does a basement get "blown out"? LOL. There are pictures and even videos on youtube of salvage crews cutting the beams at an angle after the towers fell. Cutting charges? Can you or your mentally impaired friends even prove this technology exists? Did you not watch the video of the towers falling? They started to collapse above the plane impact zone, not the basement. Your vague story based on internet myths falls apart when faced with any common sense.
There were multiple witnesses at ground zero who reported multiple explosions. William Rodriguez is one of the most credible. And before the official story was doctored up and locked into place by the media editors, there were multiple news crews and reporters on the scene who reported the same. There is the Naudet bros film that documents the lobby damage. To deny the occurrence of secondary explosions at the towers is quite laughable. Your statement is pure Ipse Dixit.
William Rodriguez and his ever evolving story.LOL.The first few retellings of his story he describes the first explosion as "sounding like furniture being moved". After he hits the PAID lecture circuit (paid by dimwits like you) he tells of a huge explosion that knocks him off of his feet. Give him a few more years and he will be describing the movie "Die Hard" with himself in the Bruce Willis role. Please address these "cutting charges" and how they went off with nobody seeing them.
You see...this is the sort of smart mouth, , junior high, attack-the-messenger sort of crap that never gets us AMERICANS anywhere and is a HUGE contributing factor to why the NWO will likely succeed. Calling me a dim-wit #1. does nothing to improve anyone's understanding of exactly what we do and do not know about 911 and #2...it's not a wise move on your part to publicly disparage a documented HERO of 911. William Rodriguez BRAVELY SAVED LIVES on 911.
There is, IMHO, sufficient photographic and physical evidence to conclude that Thermate was used on 911 to cause core column failure. Also, the degree to which the bulk building materials and contents were pulverized (a few microns) cannot be explained solely in terms of vertical collapse energy. There was also significant LATERAL EJECTION of large steel beam sections into surrounding structures. And there is CLEAR video evidence of sequential controlled explosions, but still people deny it.
How can he say controlled demolition needs to be ruled out? What investigation has he done that makes him take that position? What he SHOULD say is that he doesn't KNOW, that he's not convinced. Controlled demolition theory has merit, as much merit as any other.
he makes clear that he's investigated whether or not explosives were planted or evident, NOT the structural engineering report. Dr. Steven Jones is a Mormon. They are idiots.
saying don't talk about conspiracy is like saying don't do political analysis. how else can you rule, its not a dictatorship and its not a mob. its an oligarchy, so collusion of the top oligarchs.
The accusation in this video is false. Palast said he had not done any investigating and this is a true statement because when he investigates he gets government documents, talks with people directly involved, etc. Palast looked into the theories, research and investigating others have done, and disagreed with them because they aren't provable. You just have to listen to what he says.
This edited clip should just be deleted from youtube.
Palast gives great information, but like gatekeeper-like personas he's bias or part of a faction, so he will reveal information about other factions(ex:Big Oil), however he will Lie about, disinform or completely ignore anything that might bring attention to the faction he is associated with. I think in his case it appears that its AIPAC and 911 hes avoiding.
Chomsky is also great if you are aware of his gatekeeper-like bamboozles, hell give great info and insight(bait) and throw stuff like 'JFK, who cares' or '911, it dont matter' (he should gets coupons from the CIA)
Christopher Bollyn has some information on palast that should be of interest to anyone who questions this video, as well as, palast himself. I don't recall palast getting his butt kicked for his investigative journalism!
Palast is full of crappola! He's nothing more but a zionist liar, covering up for Israel by blaming the "Jesuits" for all the World's woes. If anyone owns his books, do us, to include yourself, a favor by burning them.
I agree partially that hes covering up for israel, but if you know this and take that into account to filter what he says (and consider that there a lot he doesnt say) you can still get interesting information from his work that you'll have a hard time finding elsewhere
I think Greg has some good points, and I have his book "The Best Democracy Money Can Buy", but I agree with DiscordianPrincess that his statements here contradict himself pretty badly. First he doesnt know anything about the demolition theory, then he does. I litte lame Greg.
Totally agree with this. My "guess" is that Greg is trying to stay clear of being labeled a complete KOOK. He is an investigative reporter and he has to maintain some semblance of credibility even though he reports on other issues that would seemingly get him into similar trouble. I see tend to view his comments merely as posturing for the benefit of preserving his ability to do what he does. Just my 2 cents...
LIEESSS! Hey Palast I got an engineer for you a MIT Engineer might i add. His name is Jeff King from MIT look it up folks dont believe this nutjob please search.
9/11 Truth: MIT Engineer Jeff King Says WTC Demolished
I really hated seeing this since I have a lot of respect for Greg Palast. Remember when the government told us that the terrorists used internet web cafes to make their contacts? Well, why didn't they , the FBI, contact the only web cafe in Venice Florida? there WAS NO investigation ...that is why. I am the person that manned the Internet cafe from opening to closing. Atta was doing drug smuggling not bombing.
Remember that guy from Capitol Hill Blue that overnight went over to the dark side? That's exactly what happened here. Greg Palast is dead to me. Greg Palast is a ghost.
Is PilesofShit a zionist Jew ? He seems at trying very hard to cover-up WhoDoneIt. It takes over 2 years to wire-up a demo site--what Bullsh!t. Only reaosn that it was a fast installation--Marvin Bush and hired hands Mossad Jews. Shit-Pilelastis a shill for Israel
Palast has done brilliant work on the stolen elections, etc. but for some reason is a moron concerning 9/11. Anyone with common sense/intelligence who sees the evidence presented by David Ray Griffin, Peter Dale Scott, Paul Thompson (911pressfortruth[dot]com), Barrie Zwicker, Steven Jones, etc. cant possibly believe the official story on 9/11. Palast "rules out" controlled demolitions, saying there are no engineers that think thats what happened; this is completely false, see ae911truth[dot]org
Or just because he wishes to raise concrete proof whilst not giving them a chance to call him a wacko, get what I mean, probably a bit of both. As the questions and evidence he is raising will lead to truths on every aspect in the end.
Palast would probably get fired by the BBC, I'm sure that's why he's saying what he is here. The BBC was involved in the false flag operation as we know from watching the footage of them announcing the collapse of building 7 too early & then pretending (poorly) to lose their satelite signal. I'm suprised more people can't see through their tricks.
I'm not sure that is definitave evidence, as you could easily imagine a report sent to UK reporters saying Building 7 is coming down which they heard from the street rumours of them planning to do so, and a missinterpretation leading them to think, its coming down as meaning it is actually coming down as we speak?
If you support Paul over Kusinich, like just about every 911 conspiracy person I've ever heard does; you are a right winger. A far right winger
And sorry, Moore doesn't believe in the conspiracy. That's why Alex Jones goes on and on about how he didn't cover "the truth" in farenheit 911. Just because he didn't laugh in the conspiracy nuts face when he got asked about it doesn't mean squat except that he has manners.
What the hell are you talking about, Paul wants to end all wars & legalize marijuana that doesn't sound very "far right" to me. You talk like someone that has been brainwashed. Go back & watch that Michael Moore interview again & listen to what he says about how the firefighters him about the explosions & how he doesn't beleive the 'hijackers' could have flown that plane into the Pentagon w/the precission that they did & that he believes the 80+ videos of it haven't been released b/c of that.
Meant to write: How the firefighters *told* him about the explosions at the World Trade Center (from the bombs). It's true that Fareignheit 9/11 WAS a whitewash, anyone of intelligence who has looked into the matter could tell you that. But since then Moore has been linking to 9/11 truth sites on his website & now HE is saying for the first time that he questions & even disbelieves the official story as we do!
Anyway, go watch the video on Google and listen to what he says instead of harping on this left/right nonsense. It's called: "Confronting Michael Moore and Amy Goodman with 9/11 truth" type that in & you can find it on Google Video.
You should watch the video again. He says something to the effect of "me asking them to release the pentagon tapes does not mean I believe in the conspiracy theory"
Moore said that the firefighters he interviewed for his most recent movie told him about the explosions in the building as well. 9/11 Truth is not right-wing, Ralph Shoenman is a truth activist & he is a socialist. Rosie O'Donnell is a liberal. People from all backgrounds are speaking out for truth & justice.
At least Palast is admitting he's not an expert on demolitions. Sort of a cop-out but whatever. We don't have to depend solely on him for the truth, he's still a source of some good information & goes on Alex Jones' show.
ever think that alex jones is a gate keeper too? try going to live video and look up september clues then go to the archives to see what they did. then go to Drjudys page and examine the photo history drjudywood(.)co(.)uk keep asking questions don't ever stop never get caught up in hero worship it coud the brain
I've been extremely critical of Jones in the past for fear mongering & for downplaying Zionism's role in 9/11 & the "War on Terror" however I don't subscribe to the no planes hit the towers or energy beam weapon theories. Look at it & I'm not convinced, and it seems discrediting. Think about this why wouldn't they just release a convincing tape of a hologram of a plane hitting the Pentagon if they were able to do it live on TV for the WTC from multiple shots?
no holograms. the fake witnesses were part of the media go watch the clips and slow the plane down and look at it closely remember Newtons 3 rd law that's how I caught it day one they screwed up big time I knew right away something was wrong with the planes. look at the witness that said no it wasn't plane it was a bomb. 2 differnt TV channels that had the same script and one show no plane. they forgot to add a plane and look at the large noaanews file
I've taken a lot of that material & I do not find it convincing. The plane was used as a bomb so it's natural that some would say that. Plus they had Israeli commandos on those planes I find that to be too much of a coincidence consider all the other evidence that implicates Israel.
Actually come to think about those original planes weren't the ones flown into the towers but I believe they were switched & remote controlled planes were used.
isreal is controled by the eliet alwasy has been. eveidently you haven'y seen the photos with the planes with only one wing. damn, thats good flying . buddy take the films apart. look up lying with pixels back in 2000.
I'm "on iggy" what does that mean? All roads lead to the bankers and money, Rome's part of it I'm sure. Adam Weishaupt of the Bavarian Illuminati was a crytpo-Jew who was outwardly a Catholic. He was financed by the Rothschilds.
He just wanted more things released to the public. He never has said he believes in the conspiracy nonsense.
Moore, like everyone else on the left saw the hatred and despair building up in the third world because of our foreign policy and was not particularly surprised when the "blowback" finally came
Um yes he said that firefighters have told him about the explosions go watch the video again. Everyone knows that America is hated in the third world, that's why they were able to sell the official story & so many people bought it on face value. But imperial governments also lie & deceive the public & engage in false flag operations when it's necessary, which it was in this case to justify the war on terror.
If you're going to frame someone you want to do it effectively. The motive was already supplied in the U.S.'s imperialist foreign policy & history of victimizing the Arabs so the frame-up of 19 patsies lead by a man in a cave attributed to blowback was believable. Democracy Now even had an interview with Christopher Ketchum about the Mossad agents who filmed 9/11 as it happened cheering & admitted foreknowlege as well as failed lie detectors given to them about their involvement.
Their van also tested positive for explosives by bomb sniffing dogs. They were later released quietly & sent back to Israel by Michael Chertoff also an Israeli operative rather than prosecuted. You should also look into the "art students" that were actually Mossad agents who were all over the WTC directly prior to 9/11. Read Counterpunch's limited hangout piece about the Israeli art students then read Christopher Bollyn's work to get the full scoop at iamthewitness DOT com SLASH bollyn DOT html
LOL The right wing conspiracy nuts being brought down to reality by palast, a real journalist
My conspiracy is that many of the conspiracy people are infact republican operatives who intend to fragment the anti-war left. Why else would they all support Ron Paul who doesn't believe in their theory either. The real reason they support Paul is because of economic issues, it has nothing to do with war policy or 911
Yeah that's why your hero Amy Goodman was right by building 7 as it was demolished running away in terror & never speaks of it. & there's video of it on the web.
How the hell can he say there's no specialist believing there are explosives used There's hundreds?? (ae911truth.) Why on earth is Prof. Jones a fruitcake all over sudden?? No evidence for explosions?? There are so many people (Fire men etc) saying that ,that even Michael Moore switched his opinion on this!!What's your game Greg???? I used to respect you,but i dont trust you for an inch now!
Steven jones research him. los alamos tes and the wat on cold fusion the DOE paid him to crush it. then he comes out and says oh yeh and makes money on it. hell you don't think that they would control the movement do you? ha.. paid hacks.. let the science guide u don't be gullable. they blew to kingdom come
Greg Palast does very good work on Election fraud and Gov't corruption in general. His original comment that investigative reporters should only report on what they investigate is true and he should have left it at that.
The worst part about Palast's ridiculous performance is when he attacks Dr. Steven Jones for being a Mormon, saying that his last theory was about Jesus and the Mayans, as if that has anything to do with the man's highly-respected work in physics. It is truly hard to believe that Palast would attack his religion to discredit him instead of sticking to the facts.
Talk about intellectual dishonesty! Shame on you Mr. Palast!
This is disgraceful. I can't believe one of my favorite journalists could be such a bumbling idiot! There are so many problems with what Palast says here, I could write a 400-page book in response (hey, someone already has - Debunking 9/11 Debunking by Dr. David Ray Griffin - Amazon it.
Wow, this really changes my opinion of Greg Palast. Chalk another one up for the Left Gatekeepers.
i think Greg Palast's works are classics. And to be honest, it doesn't bother me that Greg Palast isn't Alex Jones on the subject of 9/11. I think opposing views is ok and i tend to take a little of both but not believe any one side 100%
Talk about a massive let down. You would think Palast of all people would have a firm grasp and understanding of the 911 fraud. Evidently not. Very, very disappointing.
FeelGood30 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It's only a matter of time now they have been exposed to much they will go to jail soon!!!
dan32749 1 month ago
Greg Palast is an investigative reporter...who hasn't investigated the BIGGEST THING OF ALL TIME: 9/11!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
maplespak 2 months ago
This Lenny guy is a moron...
Stardog32 2 months ago
Well... so much for Greg Palast!!!
There is absolutely no evidence - that's because they shipped the rubble away and buried it somewhere! Do we then take this guy's standpoint and accept the official story?
No evidence? - that's because they didn't release video footage and confiscated video footage of the Pentagon explosion. Do we then accept the official story??
No evidence? - that's because .... that's because ....False 9/11 Commission.....
Fuck Palast and Chomsky! The don't deserve respect!
iankyoko 2 months ago
5:00 ... "it take 2 years to wire a building for controlled demolition" .... HUH ?
justgivemethetruth 2 months ago
Have you ever noticed that many of the left gatekeepers who are afraid to speak honestly about 9/11 happen to be jewish? Greg Palast, Amy Goodman, Naomi Klein, Howard Zinn, Noam Chomsky -- they are all jewish and they are all conspicuously evasive when questioned about 9/11.
That's because Israel did 9/11.
Watch "9/11 Missing Links" to get the dirty details.
beppu 3 months ago
@beppu
bingo.
econ3000 2 months ago
well, greg, you missed the boat on this one. AE 911 for truth about 911 proves to a certainty that controlled demolition was the means used to drop wtc 1 and 2. for an investigative reporting your stock has gone down a few points for this idiotic statement.
N321MM 5 months ago
I'm flabbergasted.
He's so sharp about much of his other reporting.
I have to say though, that I have always thought that he's a little too much of a egoist to be a great reporter. He's almost as bad a Geraldo.
Oh well, I guess he's gullible on some things, as we all can be.
smujismuj 7 months ago 3
@zephranna01 - Yeah, obvious to all you Youtube experts. LOL.
You guys are too pathetic.
tempelton 10 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
911 was a Controlled Demolition inside job
bushbasher46 1 year ago
Poor Greg, they've gotten to him too.
ole9421 1 year ago
@ole9421 - you are so fucking PARANOID dude. He just disagrees with you. You can call him dumb (but how smart are you?) You can call him misled (that's a debate worth having). But saying "they got to him too" is just TOO DUMB!!
Q: Who precisely "got to him too"? Who? Q: When? Q: Where is your proof - payments to his accounts? Video evidence of "them" meeting? THESE ARE THE QUESTIONS THAT JOURNALISTS DEMAND ANSWERS TO. Where is YOUR precise evidence that "they got to him too"?
Paranoid clown!
tempelton 10 months ago
@tempelton You're all the proof I need.
Brain washed nube!
ole9421 10 months ago
@tempelton
Well said.
JoebooSauce 1 month ago
It takes 'two years' to demo a building?
This guy has been seriously dis-informed by his sources!
proudfootz 1 year ago
None of us know what the fuck happened on 911 for sure.......other than the towers are no longer there. We lost near 60 thousand ppl. of US lives in Vietnam........over a fake attack. And the list is long. I know I cant do a dang thing about it. BUT.....the stories sure are fun to listen to.
paz/peace/salam/shalom
translationwiz 1 year ago
lol fail.
iwiwla22 1 year ago
Another smiling Jew assisting in the cover-up. It shows how the Jews 'play both sides' first with a Rabbi on Bush's lap, and then throwing him under the bus while they elevate Rahm Emanuel (a Mossad agent) to the number 2 man behind their puppet Obumma.
BudWiser999 1 year ago
Oh dear, I quite liked Palast guy until I saw this. Shame. He doesn't do this subject justice, which is troubling.
Essanach 1 year ago
Well he works for the BBC so what would you expect him to say? As far as expert opinion goes, are Richard Gage and the 1000 or so Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth also "fruitcakes"? How could anyone look at the footage of building 7 falling and say it's not a controlled demolition? Gimme a break...
glazinq 1 year ago
Palast loves to play the smart good left vs bad bad right. He will never ever ever say bad things about Dems and hence he is corrupt. I've seen his type. It's not original. Sure he sounds fun and funny but he ain't telling you the whole truth and outright lies. So you can't trust him.
Listen to his words. It's always Repub bad bad bad. Dems are the savior. What a load of crock. They're all bad, except a few like Ron Paul.
Palast is another faker.
pccchurch 2 years ago
Friday, 29 november 2009, 9:00 pm, -- 9/11 Truth on CBC's news documentary THE FIFTH ESTATE. It's Canada's "60 Minutes". Come to my channel for details.
crazyforcanada 2 years ago
I respect Creg honestly but you cant rule out stuff without looking into these theories man. And by the way you talk Creg I can tell you havent really comprehended the arguments that pinpoint towards controlled demolition.
xDisruptor 2 years ago
yes, greg palace in this instance 'doth protest too much'...
this goes to show that where integrity and misplaced loyalties collide, sadly even the most intelligent and generally benevolent people can be downright corrupt; too bad this can then cast doubt on their otherwise mostly excellent work.
cmoleon 2 years ago
Strange guy, calling Jones a "fruit cake". Mabe all his is just another controlled opposition media reporter. If you don't trust the national media, go to palast. I suspect his working for the same people who run the phoney democracy in the US.
He probably knows what went down on sept11. Just like Chomsky, is covering it up. Notice that they are both Jewish. So called rebel intellectuals and rebel reports and even Alex Jones, i believe are taking people for a ride.
truthisthemostdeadly 2 years ago
Do not believe a word this man says he is a disinfo agent.......as of todays date may 09 655 architects and engineers have called for a new investigation into WTC collapse...watch their excellent video on youtube called "blueprint for truth".
movement26 2 years ago
Palast is too much of a wuss to say what he thinks- which is, "shut up, you tin-foil hat wearing conspiracy a-hole. There is no massive 9-11 conspiracy!"
iceddante 3 years ago
I do not think it is right to attack Pallast on the basis of his Jewish heritage. He is an honest and good journalist, just listen to what he is saying it makes sense. The anti-semetic comments are insane. Stiglitz is the one who costed the whole $3trillion bill for the Iraq war.
PeterSodhi 3 years ago
"Chicago is a Zionist hotspot and Greg Palast is the son of one of Chicago's leading Zionist families. This is why he is so dedicated to diverting attention from the evidence of the Zionist involvement in 9-11"
the1stfluter 3 years ago
"Greg Palast is the product of a Chicago-based Russian Yiddish immigrant family which married into a immigrant Hungarian Jewish family. He contributes to the British press, the well known left-leaning outlets who adamantly refuse to look at the evidence from 9-11."
the1stfluter 3 years ago
"A year later, Palast came to my attention when he penned a badly-written article entitled "Was the Invasion of Iraq a Jewish Conspiracy" for the Jewish periodical Tikkun. Although Palast's logic and writing are weak, he comes on strongly as a Zionist apologist."
the1stfluter 3 years ago
I don't know he has a point. It would be easier just to let it happen. All this stuff is theories so you shouldn't really put your weight on theories. I have seen videos saying its a controlled demolition and evidence disproving it as well.
djgiga 3 years ago
If palast was covering news at the time of Hitler's rise and saw the richstag fire as something he didn't look fully into I would call that naive. Actually beyond naive. He needs to do more research, and beyond that, open his mind on this issue. I'm not a structural engineer either but I have an understanding because of more than just the demolitions, because of the startling number of inconsistencies that exist! You don't need to be a scientist of any kind to figure this one out!
MIKAELLL420 3 years ago
He protesteth too much. There was controlled demolition on 911.
peapod8 3 years ago
Google Danny Jowenko. He's who you need to talk to... plus, he's right next to the country that has THE HAGUE - the world court.
WNanette 3 years ago
Palast as a Structural Engineer didn't investigate it. Anyway, he has been VERY busy doing 20 other things - why pick on him for not being another 9/11 expert?
Lenny kept pushing to hear his buddy say what he wanted him to say, so that's when Palast started attacking Jones (or his provably whacko Moron religion. Before the name morphed into Moroni, it was written down as MORON).
Palast's contemporary (and fellow Jew); Michael Moore's Agent is none other than Michael Chertoff's cousin.
So....
WNanette 3 years ago
This comes out of the mouth of a man who works for a Broadcast system that actually reported the fall of WTC7 while it was still standing.He is right on target in many of his reports but this one he has not done enoug research or has been instructed not to.He as right about 1 thing the WTC's were not taken down b dynamite,it was Thermite.A shame he has sold out on this issue. I suspect Britan has some inside involvement in this and he was warned not to dig to deep. Onr thing for sure,inside job.
Krazede 3 years ago 2
The interviewer asks Palast: "Do you believe that those two planes took down three World Trade Center towers?" He basically answers that he hasn't fully investigated the question, but he DOES know it wasn't controlled demolition. I see nothing inconsistent about that.
Symian27 3 years ago 2
exactly
thinkalittlemore 3 years ago
Greg Palast needs to keep his job at BBC.
I trust him on anything but 9/11.
BBC reported WTC7 falling before it did; he works for them. Without them he could not do the other important work that he does do well.
$0.02
Coil
coilYTcoyle 3 years ago
greg palast is a muckraker from london.he will tell it 10 different ways for publicity,to sell his books.i'm surprised that he didn't find some way to agree with the 911 ct. ask yourself why he's always got his nose stuck in our business. why does he not stay in his own country and report about what's going on in london? could it be they are tired of his bs and ignore him. or has he stepped on too many toes with his spins?
wilmaohman 3 years ago
Come on Greg, Steven Jones is not a fruitcake, he's just a Mormon, so he believes some weird stuff about Jesus. I mean even weirder than most Christians.
thenoblelie 3 years ago
Molten metal for 4 weeks on all 3 buildings. Explain that. Thermate not dynamite.
Larry Silverstien ' Let's Pull It!!
Police telling people to get back the building is about to blow up minutes before #7 was imploded. Now, how would the police know a building is going to blow up and the exact time.
blackcherry1212 3 years ago
Palast is a zionist shill, a gatekeeper, he will denounce Bush, Big Oil, and so on but he's not going to point things that might make inside job plausible (since 911 was Mossad+MIC/CIA job)
Atta's mint passport (yea right)
Odigo (Israeli corp) text warning
The Israelis arrested by GW Bridge with explosives and the Moving company
WTC7
The exercices Vigilant Guardian, Amalgam Virgo, etc
Cheney changing interception Protocol 2 months before 911
FBI not releasing videos f 80 pent cameras
Rickdeckard2020 3 years ago
then they should pay him off
ash4432 3 years ago
i'm lost---wtc 7 was "pulled" according to words out of silvierstein's own mouth. if it takes months to wire buildings then someone was wiring building 7 prior to the attacks. why? shame on palast. he usually is so reasonable. he seems scared to state the obvious.
pablocruiser 3 years ago
Palast is great - at what he does.
If you guys want to yank someone's chain, get in touch with Danny in Denmark, and his sophomoric Structural Engineering kiddies.
WNanette 3 years ago
9/11 was allowed to happen. But you need to get these imposters in court for engineering Bush winning the last two elections. Once you have the scumbag in prison along with his fellow thieves then you can investigate 9/11 again properly.
wildcat1550 3 years ago 9
I'm sorry you're mistaken. Bush Never won the first election in 2000, much less the 2nd, he was SELECTED by the supreme court. You'll need to see the documentary "Counting on democracy" with Greg Palast. where he uncovered the voter fraud in Florida by Jeb Bush Katherine Harris and DBT,a subsidiary of Choice Point which was run by John Poindexter, Iran Contra felon. Also tied to the bushes.GWB was SELECTED, not Elected. something you should never forget.we voted and they just took it away...
Sofedup 3 years ago 5
@Sofedup So Al Gore calls for a recount in 3 heavily democratic counties in FLA, can't find enough votes to win in the legal 7 day window that FLA law allows for and that means he won?
Pogue009 2 weeks ago
Further, this video suggests the dishonest of the theorists. Think about it. How come the _only_ acceptable theory amongst the theorists is that the towers were a controlled demolition? Why not explore the Bush-in-league-with-Osama angle? Bush did, after all, leave Saudi Arabia just like Osama wanted him to (though not because of the Towers, but still, you could make the argument). The conspiracy theorists shut down anyone who has an alternative theory, just like the Bush administration.
sharpestirony 3 years ago 2
Palast did not contradict himself. If you investigate a theory and find no evidence supporting that theory you cannot report on that theory -- you'll have nothing to say. Did the person who made this video fail to understand logic or grammar? Palast looked into the controlled demolition issue, found nothing to support it, and said as much.
sharpestirony 3 years ago
Why do you fight eachither. Fight Bush, the evil crime lord. Bush is crooked shit. Get your hatred on him.
KNOWYOUNOW 3 years ago 3
Why do some 9 11 truthers argue against him. Your fighting eachother grow up.
KNOWYOUNOW 3 years ago 2
"Controlled demolition I can rule out." Because you're an idiot and you don't have all the facts: Evidence of thermite used to melt the steel of the towers-Evidence of shape charges used to disrupt the foundation of the towers-jet fuel can't melt steel-the towers fell at free fall speed and not approximately 45 seconds that it would have taken if the floors collapsed one atop another-dozens of witnesses reporting explosions after the planes had already hit. Don't believe this jackass.
yonigga223 3 years ago
i agree with you brother...but this guy is no idiot he is one of the best investigators out there..he is just saying it as he sees it...sometimes we dont like what he sees...but he is an good man...how ever it happened..
when you look at how many people made money off the attacks...with put-options for american and united stock to drop... its safe to say ..9/11 inside job.
C0MIC25 3 years ago
911 was an outside job, but those Americans who work for outsiders knew and help it happen
So who was paid to do the crime of 911?
antonKASA2007 3 years ago
The Bush administration, including Cheney, Rumsfeld and all the others. Our perceived control over our government is the greatest hoax.
maximusuper 3 years ago
I do think that 9/11 was an inside job, 'MIHOP' style, as coined by Webster Tarpley... and I think Greg Palast should check out Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.
However, Palast has done plenty of good, solid investigative reporting on Bush crimes, New Orleans, the oil companies and other important stories... reaching people who wouldn't otherwise consider themselves conspiracy believers. So what if he doesn't believe 9/11 was an inside job, if you believe it you don't need him to agree.
FightTheElite 3 years ago
I do think that 9/11 was an inside job, 'MIHOP' style, as coined by Webster Tarpley... and I think Greg Palast should check out Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.
However, Palast has done plenty of good, solid investigative reporting on Bush crimes, New Orleans, the oil companies and other important stories... reaching people who wouldn't otherwise consider themselves conspiracy believers. So what if he doesn't believe 9/11 was an inside job, if you believe it you don't need him to agree.
FightTheElite 3 years ago 2
The more I watch this video, the more I believe Greg is trying to cover his butt. He's CLEARLY contradicting himself. First he declares he is NOT an expert and hasn't investigated it, then he's magically enough of an expert to completely discredit Dr. Jones AND COMPLETELY rule out controlled demolition?? He also says there were NO EXPERTS/ENGINEERS involved....uh...don't like Dr. Jones? Then how 'bout Jeff King from MIT?? Again, we don't have all the answers, but we sure got HOLES...
kerplunck 3 years ago
Most of us in the general public, myself included, are NOT experts in the fields necessary to properly evaluate the physics and other forensic aspects. This is why our government's mishandling of the whole 911 event, before, during, and AFTER the fact is so important. In fact, until and unless our elected officials can come through with a full-scale, impartial, and uncensored investigation on 911, I consider the entire Bush Administration guilty of TREASON by reason of WILLFUL FAILURE TO ACT .
kerplunck 3 years ago
Bottom line: Without question...the Bush Administration is 100%, flat out TOTALLY RESPONSIBLE for the death and destruction of 911, and particularly the after-effects since then including the deaths of our service men/women and tens of thousands of innocent Iraqi citizens.
The ONLY question which really needs to be answered is whether or not they were GROSSLY INCOMPETENCE on a GALACTIC MAGNITUDE, were the WILLFULLY BLIND BENEFACTORS, or the TREASONOUS CREATORS...it's all the same to ME.
kerplunck 3 years ago
Here's the 911 problem as I see it. We certainly don't know all the details, but I believe we know enough to know that the OFFICIAL story has some serious holes that demand an explanation. This was a MAJOR CRIME and our elected officials have a responsibility to all AMERICANS to do everything within their power to #1. Provide a FULL and UNCENSORED investigation as to what happened. This should be JOB 1. It was swept under the rug and whitewashed, which ALONE breeds more conspiracy theories.
kerplunck 3 years ago
WTF is he talking about? The towers were obviously blown up. Anyone can see mid way through the collapse the towers exploding. And you can even see debris going up before going down creating this palm tree effect. How can 2 planes destroy 3 building completely. 2x 110 floor + 1x 47 floor completely eradicated. You need a lot of power to do that and planes and fires are just not enough.
He's done some great work before that, but he's way off on this one.
MustacheVerra 3 years ago
Palast is squirming like a Fox News Anchor. Wow. This is really an eye-opening video. What the hell is wrong with this guy? He tells it like it is most of the time, and then when it comes to the really big issues like 9/11, he turns into an emotional bumbling idiot. Remarkable how similar this phenomenon is to that of Noam Chomsky, Matt Rothschild, and other "leaders" of the left. Better check and see how much money these guys are getting from the Ford Foundation and other CIA fronts.
Nataliagonzalez26198 3 years ago
If Greg Palast gives in to these nonsensical, sensationalist, conspiracy theories, than his credibility to do the real work--you should be praising him for--is demolished.
He has done his best to expose a lot of wrong doing in this country, and by this governamnet. You ought to have respect for him.
alteredlame666 3 years ago 2
Andrew Evans (BBC journalist) was in WTC lobby on 9/11. He heard no planes, saw no planes but moments later described three or four huge explosions at ground level. Whilst Greg Palast may be intent on exposing the truth about the Bush/Bin Laden connection, why is he ignoring the testimony of one of the most reliable witnesses and colleagues?
kaferere 4 years ago 3
Explosions at ground level are not verified by damage. Nobody who left or entered the building after the planes hit reported any damage at ground level. No damage=no bombs OR explosions before the planes hit. What part of this equation don't you 9-11 truthers get?
dreadnaught2 4 years ago
So you're saying that the lobby windows being blown out and the marble being blown off the lobby walls and the basement being blown out and the steel being cut at 45 degree angles from cutting charges in the basement and testimony from firemen and reliable journalists is no proof then? Oh I see, just as long as you know what you're talking about. What is it you 911 liars don't get?
kaferere 4 years ago
How does a basement get "blown out"? LOL. There are pictures and even videos on youtube of salvage crews cutting the beams at an angle after the towers fell. Cutting charges? Can you or your mentally impaired friends even prove this technology exists? Did you not watch the video of the towers falling? They started to collapse above the plane impact zone, not the basement. Your vague story based on internet myths falls apart when faced with any common sense.
dreadnaught2 4 years ago
There were multiple witnesses at ground zero who reported multiple explosions. William Rodriguez is one of the most credible. And before the official story was doctored up and locked into place by the media editors, there were multiple news crews and reporters on the scene who reported the same. There is the Naudet bros film that documents the lobby damage. To deny the occurrence of secondary explosions at the towers is quite laughable. Your statement is pure Ipse Dixit.
kerplunck 4 years ago
William Rodriguez and his ever evolving story.LOL.The first few retellings of his story he describes the first explosion as "sounding like furniture being moved". After he hits the PAID lecture circuit (paid by dimwits like you) he tells of a huge explosion that knocks him off of his feet. Give him a few more years and he will be describing the movie "Die Hard" with himself in the Bruce Willis role. Please address these "cutting charges" and how they went off with nobody seeing them.
dreadnaught2 4 years ago
You see...this is the sort of smart mouth, , junior high, attack-the-messenger sort of crap that never gets us AMERICANS anywhere and is a HUGE contributing factor to why the NWO will likely succeed. Calling me a dim-wit #1. does nothing to improve anyone's understanding of exactly what we do and do not know about 911 and #2...it's not a wise move on your part to publicly disparage a documented HERO of 911. William Rodriguez BRAVELY SAVED LIVES on 911.
kerplunck 3 years ago 2
There is, IMHO, sufficient photographic and physical evidence to conclude that Thermate was used on 911 to cause core column failure. Also, the degree to which the bulk building materials and contents were pulverized (a few microns) cannot be explained solely in terms of vertical collapse energy. There was also significant LATERAL EJECTION of large steel beam sections into surrounding structures. And there is CLEAR video evidence of sequential controlled explosions, but still people deny it.
kerplunck 3 years ago 2
How can he say controlled demolition needs to be ruled out? What investigation has he done that makes him take that position? What he SHOULD say is that he doesn't KNOW, that he's not convinced. Controlled demolition theory has merit, as much merit as any other.
neboolus 4 years ago 2
he makes clear that he's investigated whether or not explosives were planted or evident, NOT the structural engineering report. Dr. Steven Jones is a Mormon. They are idiots.
mooneez 4 years ago
saying don't talk about conspiracy is like saying don't do political analysis. how else can you rule, its not a dictatorship and its not a mob. its an oligarchy, so collusion of the top oligarchs.
gosciu555 4 years ago 2
The accusation in this video is false. Palast said he had not done any investigating and this is a true statement because when he investigates he gets government documents, talks with people directly involved, etc. Palast looked into the theories, research and investigating others have done, and disagreed with them because they aren't provable. You just have to listen to what he says.
This edited clip should just be deleted from youtube.
aarontk 4 years ago
Palast gives great information, but like gatekeeper-like personas he's bias or part of a faction, so he will reveal information about other factions(ex:Big Oil), however he will Lie about, disinform or completely ignore anything that might bring attention to the faction he is associated with. I think in his case it appears that its AIPAC and 911 hes avoiding.
Rickdeckard2020 4 years ago 2
Chomsky is also great if you are aware of his gatekeeper-like bamboozles, hell give great info and insight(bait) and throw stuff like 'JFK, who cares' or '911, it dont matter' (he should gets coupons from the CIA)
Rickdeckard2020 4 years ago 2
I agree. Chomsky has fantastic info. He simply refuses to enter into any NWO type discussion.
cybersphere 4 years ago 2
If the Bush Administration had planned 9/11, 9/11 would never have happened.
911myths is an excellent conspiracy-debunking site.
PerryLogan 4 years ago
Christopher Bollyn has some information on palast that should be of interest to anyone who questions this video, as well as, palast himself. I don't recall palast getting his butt kicked for his investigative journalism!
shroomraptor 4 years ago
Palast is full of crappola! He's nothing more but a zionist liar, covering up for Israel by blaming the "Jesuits" for all the World's woes. If anyone owns his books, do us, to include yourself, a favor by burning them.
shroomraptor 4 years ago
I agree partially that hes covering up for israel, but if you know this and take that into account to filter what he says (and consider that there a lot he doesnt say) you can still get interesting information from his work that you'll have a hard time finding elsewhere
Rickdeckard2020 4 years ago 2
I think Greg has some good points, and I have his book "The Best Democracy Money Can Buy", but I agree with DiscordianPrincess that his statements here contradict himself pretty badly. First he doesnt know anything about the demolition theory, then he does. I litte lame Greg.
upT3mpo 4 years ago
Totally agree with this. My "guess" is that Greg is trying to stay clear of being labeled a complete KOOK. He is an investigative reporter and he has to maintain some semblance of credibility even though he reports on other issues that would seemingly get him into similar trouble. I see tend to view his comments merely as posturing for the benefit of preserving his ability to do what he does. Just my 2 cents...
kerplunck 4 years ago
That's possible and i can understand that.
MustacheVerra 3 years ago
LIEESSS! Hey Palast I got an engineer for you a MIT Engineer might i add. His name is Jeff King from MIT look it up folks dont believe this nutjob please search.
9/11 Truth: MIT Engineer Jeff King Says WTC Demolished
shaiharstine 4 years ago
What a bunch of whiny cranky conservatives. I think they're pissed off because Palast actually does his homework.
golem269 4 years ago
I understand Doctor Jones is coming for yous Greg!
MarkB1ngham 4 years ago
palast is correct
estopa2006 4 years ago
timeforchange2007.blogspot
Help me fix the mess!!
begotka2007 4 years ago
His views on 9/11 are not suprising for someone who works for the British Bullshit Corporation
dylan7789 4 years ago 3
Wow. You guys are pretty scary and pretty crazy.
GGWarrior 4 years ago
Palast is exposed!
klepzo 4 years ago 2
I really hated seeing this since I have a lot of respect for Greg Palast. Remember when the government told us that the terrorists used internet web cafes to make their contacts? Well, why didn't they , the FBI, contact the only web cafe in Venice Florida? there WAS NO investigation ...that is why. I am the person that manned the Internet cafe from opening to closing. Atta was doing drug smuggling not bombing.
FreedomSwanUSA 4 years ago
palast, you don't even know that bushit's brother was in charge of the security of the WORLD TRADE CENTER.
You are the fruitcake, moron.
merged 4 years ago
This guy thinks hes Tony Bliar
Bliar was another Brit-puppet actor that got away with a lot.. but hes finished
Greg Palast is finished without even getting started
jamesbt20 4 years ago
Remember that guy from Capitol Hill Blue that overnight went over to the dark side? That's exactly what happened here. Greg Palast is dead to me. Greg Palast is a ghost.
gingermax 4 years ago
To paraphrase Palast himself..He is a complete shill and an utter fraud. Period.
banjo234 4 years ago
Is PilesofShit a zionist Jew ? He seems at trying very hard to cover-up WhoDoneIt. It takes over 2 years to wire-up a demo site--what Bullsh!t. Only reaosn that it was a fast installation--Marvin Bush and hired hands Mossad Jews. Shit-Pilelastis a shill for Israel
geo1671 4 years ago
Palast has done brilliant work on the stolen elections, etc. but for some reason is a moron concerning 9/11. Anyone with common sense/intelligence who sees the evidence presented by David Ray Griffin, Peter Dale Scott, Paul Thompson (911pressfortruth[dot]com), Barrie Zwicker, Steven Jones, etc. cant possibly believe the official story on 9/11. Palast "rules out" controlled demolitions, saying there are no engineers that think thats what happened; this is completely false, see ae911truth[dot]org
8foldpath4peace 4 years ago
WAHAHAH!! Great conclusions. :)
ShadesofScorpius 4 years ago
Palast has just exposed himself as the real fraud, im glad to finally have confirmation of it.
memeticverb 4 years ago
It is really funny how ignorant people discredit rational people by distorting and twisting words, whilst ignoring the points made which make sense.
Kind of like they know these people talk sense and they need to hide this sense.
1d10cy 4 years ago
Yes Palast needs to hide here, he can't say gee maybe it was demolition as he's be fired for doing so & maybe worse.
DaveIrie 4 years ago
Or just because he wishes to raise concrete proof whilst not giving them a chance to call him a wacko, get what I mean, probably a bit of both. As the questions and evidence he is raising will lead to truths on every aspect in the end.
1d10cy 4 years ago
At 6.08 he begins to show his real position on the issue, now watch properly and listen carefully
1d10cy 4 years ago
Palast would probably get fired by the BBC, I'm sure that's why he's saying what he is here. The BBC was involved in the false flag operation as we know from watching the footage of them announcing the collapse of building 7 too early & then pretending (poorly) to lose their satelite signal. I'm suprised more people can't see through their tricks.
DaveIrie 4 years ago
I'm not sure that is definitave evidence, as you could easily imagine a report sent to UK reporters saying Building 7 is coming down which they heard from the street rumours of them planning to do so, and a missinterpretation leading them to think, its coming down as meaning it is actually coming down as we speak?
1d10cy 4 years ago
I think we have more substantial questions based on more solid things, to be focusing on.
1d10cy 4 years ago
At 6.08 he begins to show his real position on the issue, now watch properly and listen carefully
1d10cy 4 years ago
If you support Paul over Kusinich, like just about every 911 conspiracy person I've ever heard does; you are a right winger. A far right winger
And sorry, Moore doesn't believe in the conspiracy. That's why Alex Jones goes on and on about how he didn't cover "the truth" in farenheit 911. Just because he didn't laugh in the conspiracy nuts face when he got asked about it doesn't mean squat except that he has manners.
AmyGoodmanFan 4 years ago
What the hell are you talking about, Paul wants to end all wars & legalize marijuana that doesn't sound very "far right" to me. You talk like someone that has been brainwashed. Go back & watch that Michael Moore interview again & listen to what he says about how the firefighters him about the explosions & how he doesn't beleive the 'hijackers' could have flown that plane into the Pentagon w/the precission that they did & that he believes the 80+ videos of it haven't been released b/c of that.
DaveIrie 4 years ago
Meant to write: How the firefighters *told* him about the explosions at the World Trade Center (from the bombs). It's true that Fareignheit 9/11 WAS a whitewash, anyone of intelligence who has looked into the matter could tell you that. But since then Moore has been linking to 9/11 truth sites on his website & now HE is saying for the first time that he questions & even disbelieves the official story as we do!
DaveIrie 4 years ago
Anyway, go watch the video on Google and listen to what he says instead of harping on this left/right nonsense. It's called: "Confronting Michael Moore and Amy Goodman with 9/11 truth" type that in & you can find it on Google Video.
DaveIrie 4 years ago
moore just came out
atwitsend 4 years ago
Yep
DaveIrie 4 years ago
Moore doesn't believe in theory, sorry
This is almost strictly a right-wing thing
You should watch the video again. He says something to the effect of "me asking them to release the pentagon tapes does not mean I believe in the conspiracy theory"
AmyGoodmanFan 4 years ago
Moore said that the firefighters he interviewed for his most recent movie told him about the explosions in the building as well. 9/11 Truth is not right-wing, Ralph Shoenman is a truth activist & he is a socialist. Rosie O'Donnell is a liberal. People from all backgrounds are speaking out for truth & justice.
DaveIrie 4 years ago
At least Palast is admitting he's not an expert on demolitions. Sort of a cop-out but whatever. We don't have to depend solely on him for the truth, he's still a source of some good information & goes on Alex Jones' show.
DaveIrie 4 years ago
ever think that alex jones is a gate keeper too? try going to live video and look up september clues then go to the archives to see what they did. then go to Drjudys page and examine the photo history drjudywood(.)co(.)uk keep asking questions don't ever stop never get caught up in hero worship it coud the brain
atwitsend 4 years ago
I've been extremely critical of Jones in the past for fear mongering & for downplaying Zionism's role in 9/11 & the "War on Terror" however I don't subscribe to the no planes hit the towers or energy beam weapon theories. Look at it & I'm not convinced, and it seems discrediting. Think about this why wouldn't they just release a convincing tape of a hologram of a plane hitting the Pentagon if they were able to do it live on TV for the WTC from multiple shots?
DaveIrie 4 years ago
no holograms. the fake witnesses were part of the media go watch the clips and slow the plane down and look at it closely remember Newtons 3 rd law that's how I caught it day one they screwed up big time I knew right away something was wrong with the planes. look at the witness that said no it wasn't plane it was a bomb. 2 differnt TV channels that had the same script and one show no plane. they forgot to add a plane and look at the large noaanews file
atwitsend 4 years ago
I've taken a lot of that material & I do not find it convincing. The plane was used as a bomb so it's natural that some would say that. Plus they had Israeli commandos on those planes I find that to be too much of a coincidence consider all the other evidence that implicates Israel.
DaveIrie 4 years ago
Actually come to think about those original planes weren't the ones flown into the towers but I believe they were switched & remote controlled planes were used.
DaveIrie 4 years ago
isreal is controled by the eliet alwasy has been. eveidently you haven'y seen the photos with the planes with only one wing. damn, thats good flying . buddy take the films apart. look up lying with pixels back in 2000.
atwitsend 4 years ago
Elites such as the Rothschilds. It looks to me like you can't see the other wing from the angle it's shot at b/c it is thin.
DaveIrie 4 years ago
the rabbit hole is deep. all roads led to rome always have. your now on iggy .. bye bye
atwitsend 4 years ago
I'm "on iggy" what does that mean? All roads lead to the bankers and money, Rome's part of it I'm sure. Adam Weishaupt of the Bavarian Illuminati was a crytpo-Jew who was outwardly a Catholic. He was financed by the Rothschilds.
DaveIrie 4 years ago
BTW Michael Moore didn't change his opinion
He just wanted more things released to the public. He never has said he believes in the conspiracy nonsense.
Moore, like everyone else on the left saw the hatred and despair building up in the third world because of our foreign policy and was not particularly surprised when the "blowback" finally came
AmyGoodmanFan 4 years ago
Um yes he said that firefighters have told him about the explosions go watch the video again. Everyone knows that America is hated in the third world, that's why they were able to sell the official story & so many people bought it on face value. But imperial governments also lie & deceive the public & engage in false flag operations when it's necessary, which it was in this case to justify the war on terror.
DaveIrie 4 years ago
If you're going to frame someone you want to do it effectively. The motive was already supplied in the U.S.'s imperialist foreign policy & history of victimizing the Arabs so the frame-up of 19 patsies lead by a man in a cave attributed to blowback was believable. Democracy Now even had an interview with Christopher Ketchum about the Mossad agents who filmed 9/11 as it happened cheering & admitted foreknowlege as well as failed lie detectors given to them about their involvement.
DaveIrie 4 years ago
Their van also tested positive for explosives by bomb sniffing dogs. They were later released quietly & sent back to Israel by Michael Chertoff also an Israeli operative rather than prosecuted. You should also look into the "art students" that were actually Mossad agents who were all over the WTC directly prior to 9/11. Read Counterpunch's limited hangout piece about the Israeli art students then read Christopher Bollyn's work to get the full scoop at iamthewitness DOT com SLASH bollyn DOT html
DaveIrie 4 years ago
LOL The right wing conspiracy nuts being brought down to reality by palast, a real journalist
My conspiracy is that many of the conspiracy people are infact republican operatives who intend to fragment the anti-war left. Why else would they all support Ron Paul who doesn't believe in their theory either. The real reason they support Paul is because of economic issues, it has nothing to do with war policy or 911
Fruitcake and utter fraud sounds about right
AmyGoodmanFan 4 years ago
Yeah that's why your hero Amy Goodman was right by building 7 as it was demolished running away in terror & never speaks of it. & there's video of it on the web.
DaveIrie 4 years ago
How the hell can he say there's no specialist believing there are explosives used There's hundreds?? (ae911truth.) Why on earth is Prof. Jones a fruitcake all over sudden?? No evidence for explosions?? There are so many people (Fire men etc) saying that ,that even Michael Moore switched his opinion on this!!What's your game Greg???? I used to respect you,but i dont trust you for an inch now!
Barbaricfellow 4 years ago
Jones is a fraud and Palast is a gatekeeper.
atwitsend 4 years ago
Jones is not a fraud.
DaveIrie 4 years ago
Steven Jones that is.
DaveIrie 4 years ago
Steven jones research him. los alamos tes and the wat on cold fusion the DOE paid him to crush it. then he comes out and says oh yeh and makes money on it. hell you don't think that they would control the movement do you? ha.. paid hacks.. let the science guide u don't be gullable. they blew to kingdom come
atwitsend 4 years ago
well Palast is right seems Jones really is a fraud. go to debunking911_ com, seriously do it, shows what kinds of scientist he is.
truthseeker83 4 years ago
Jones has already responded to these arguments, and proven his own. journalof911studies
memeticverb 4 years ago
Palast speaks the truth. Remember that he could find a needle in a haystack, so if he can't find anything to support CD then it speaks volumes.
thAchauffeur 4 years ago
wow, i used to have such respect for Palast... That just went away... oops.
lestliness 4 years ago
Greg Palast does very good work on Election fraud and Gov't corruption in general. His original comment that investigative reporters should only report on what they investigate is true and he should have left it at that.
PDFlogic 4 years ago
Here's the dozens and dozens of trained academics and scholars that disagree with you Mr. Palast:
Scholars for 9/11 truth st911*org
peaceV73 4 years ago
The worst part about Palast's ridiculous performance is when he attacks Dr. Steven Jones for being a Mormon, saying that his last theory was about Jesus and the Mayans, as if that has anything to do with the man's highly-respected work in physics. It is truly hard to believe that Palast would attack his religion to discredit him instead of sticking to the facts.
Talk about intellectual dishonesty! Shame on you Mr. Palast!
truthtinkle 4 years ago
This is disgraceful. I can't believe one of my favorite journalists could be such a bumbling idiot! There are so many problems with what Palast says here, I could write a 400-page book in response (hey, someone already has - Debunking 9/11 Debunking by Dr. David Ray Griffin - Amazon it.
Wow, this really changes my opinion of Greg Palast. Chalk another one up for the Left Gatekeepers.
truthtinkle 4 years ago
i think Greg Palast's works are classics. And to be honest, it doesn't bother me that Greg Palast isn't Alex Jones on the subject of 9/11. I think opposing views is ok and i tend to take a little of both but not believe any one side 100%
NyTeCRaWLeRx 4 years ago