you can still run your gtx 280s and hd4870s in unison with this prossesor and you can over clock it as a mater of fact it is ubber sick with it with and added 50% or dubbling normal fps in some cases
pointless now that The GTX 260 &280 support the Novadex physics engine. the 280 can pull around 1 TFLOP! if you had sli you would have 1 TFLOP devoted to physics.
A single Intel core is faster than two or three GPU cores, not only that is several time over more flexible.
The problem with the CPU is that the bus because a bottleneck, but when Intel decide to add 8, 12 and 16, 24 and 32 cores to the CPU. plus a 512, maybe 1024 bit bus and a memory controller in the CPU.
There is not way any GPU can keep up with Multi cores CPUs, so I can see that in 3 to 4 year GPUs will die unless Nvidia star making their own CPUs to compete with Intel or AMD
Ummmm yeah, that's why we use dedicated GPU's. The GPU is much faster and more dynamic than a CPU, ever hear of CUDA? Thats C programming on GPU's. Eventually the CPU and GPU will merge.
Not really, CPU's are used to run 1-20 Long and complicated sets of instruction sets. GPU's are better (Because of their floating point) To calculate billions of calculations per second that are short and repetitive. You still need CPU's. GPU's are for other things.
Thanks for the upload, very unimpressed however. Multi-core is an up hill battle it looks like performance doubling has slowed down to 3-3.5 years. We need faster clocks!
My old emachine can do this, what is the point of this video?
TripleView 2 years ago
Im sick of all this Intel i7 hype. Heres some actual factual proof why intel i7 is not designed for gaming but designed for servers.
Intel i7+large L3 cache+extremely small L2 cache= not very good gaming performance.
Fact:games Utilize large L2 cache, thats why current dual core and quads are good.
Please read these articles before commenting.
Intelligent comments please.
Lakomcl 3 years ago
if you check the intel site they say themselves its not meant for servers.
It also categorised under workstation cpu.
The XEON's are server cpu's
Capeau 3 years ago
you can still run your gtx 280s and hd4870s in unison with this prossesor and you can over clock it as a mater of fact it is ubber sick with it with and added 50% or dubbling normal fps in some cases
heartsofstone989 3 years ago
ZzZzzZZZzZZzZZzzZ
figlie 3 years ago
What's going to happen, you wont be able to overclock 'cos you can fuck the processer up.
cryingmushroom47 3 years ago
Hwo want to overclock this beauty?
Kristof19192 3 years ago
Repeat in proper English.
cryingmushroom47 3 years ago
I'm hungarian I don't speak perfect english.'Hwo' -Who-
Kristof19192 3 years ago
I'm not even going to buy it so i don't have to worry about overclocking.
cryingmushroom47 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
they copy and redesign AMD chip
sonofliberty08 3 years ago
But does it run crysis?
moneyall 3 years ago 2
lol, good question!
Dan4157 3 years ago 2
No. Computers can't run Crysis.
burrusukh 3 years ago
Crysis sucks cause the engine is the most crappy shit since windows vista.
lolpalol2342 2 years ago
damn that was awestrikingly unimpressive...
owebbo 3 years ago
lol, i want to see the back of the case, probly pluged the monitor into a gtx 280.....
m41c0ml1n3 3 years ago
pointless now that The GTX 260 &280 support the Novadex physics engine. the 280 can pull around 1 TFLOP! if you had sli you would have 1 TFLOP devoted to physics.
sonofhendrix 3 years ago
I love my BFG280 :D
rushnerd 3 years ago
I love my 4870 more!
Dan4157 3 years ago
Pathetic, isn't it?
LessthanJake14 3 years ago
The Nahelem with 4 cores with share memory and internal memory controller is a good starts.
The future belong to the CPU. The real battle will be fought with software, not with not with the best hardware.
JerezJulio 3 years ago
Brrrwaaahhhhhaaaahahah!! You are correct! We have hardware that many programmers have no clue how to write optimally for.
Kg277 3 years ago
Its sad isn't it.
Dan4157 3 years ago
A single Intel core is faster than two or three GPU cores, not only that is several time over more flexible.
The problem with the CPU is that the bus because a bottleneck, but when Intel decide to add 8, 12 and 16, 24 and 32 cores to the CPU. plus a 512, maybe 1024 bit bus and a memory controller in the CPU.
There is not way any GPU can keep up with Multi cores CPUs, so I can see that in 3 to 4 year GPUs will die unless Nvidia star making their own CPUs to compete with Intel or AMD
JerezJulio 3 years ago
Ummmm yeah, that's why we use dedicated GPU's. The GPU is much faster and more dynamic than a CPU, ever hear of CUDA? Thats C programming on GPU's. Eventually the CPU and GPU will merge.
brianthompson72 3 years ago
thats like my monitor lol, which board is better price to performane 780i or 790i plz reply and bare in mind both dont support nehalem.
camz2008 3 years ago
looks like its the end of Cpu. with nvidia CUDA all u need a GPU
3dlegoman 3 years ago
Good for a cpu. Just sad a GPU can do that many times faster.
Nightcover 3 years ago
1337th view. w00t!
AndromedasWake 3 years ago
nvidia ran this demo at 300fps, this is run at ~20fps
gruntuh 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Why not run *all* the system software on a GPU instead of a CPU? Boot vista in 3 seconds, I'm a tellin' you!!
Kg277 3 years ago
Not really, CPU's are used to run 1-20 Long and complicated sets of instruction sets. GPU's are better (Because of their floating point) To calculate billions of calculations per second that are short and repetitive. You still need CPU's. GPU's are for other things.
Youanden 3 years ago 4
Thanks for the upload, very unimpressed however. Multi-core is an up hill battle it looks like performance doubling has slowed down to 3-3.5 years. We need faster clocks!
morgs2020 3 years ago