Added: 2 years ago
From: TexFilms
Views: 27,061
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (76)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Not one decent landing in the vid... :(

  • Iron maiden ftw.nice vid dude.

  • wtf what carrier is that?

  • u\gh iron maiden sucks

  • @SlaythemRaW Fuck you!

  • That 747 was funny!! LOL

  • nice song choice XD

  • CAN ANYONE TELL ME WHY MY AI CARRIERS WONT WORK? I TRIED EVERYTHING!

  • @RVCAXD acceleration mate you need acceleration

  • Wow, is that the USS John.C.Stennis?

  • HAHA i was singing along with the song but when i saw that 747 trying to land instead of me singing aces high and shouted "WHAAAAATT THEEEE FUUUUUCK"!

  • where do you have the carrier from?

  • why didnt you use the catapult for the take offs?

  • I hate Iron maiden

  • your film quality is amazing good. And the lens pan is great, too.

  • GREAT SONG!!!!

  • Nice touch and go.

  • hahaha the 747

  • what is the video FX on 2:02

    i can never find it on sony vegas pro 9

  • what kind of plane is it in the begining?

  • how did you get the carrier

  • nice song

  • if you just buy FSX do you get fighter jets as well?

  • this is a jump jet carrier...the Alpha flight sim carrier for FSX is the shit. Nimitz class all realistic

  • I have this carrier and tried it online but nobody in the server wasnt able to see my carrier, cuz they dont have it

  • Personaly, i think this carrier sucks. #1, you wernt using your hook,#2, you wernt using the catapults. so, in other words, not realistic. but thats only my opinion. i still think it was a good video, but in Fsx im lookng for realism.

  • I also think so, bud is the best carrier for online sessions

  • @shadowblade145 it is abacus -.-'

  • @superlukko Oh yeah. They really suck when it comes to that.

  • @shadowblade145: The Skyhawk could easily take off simply using the whole carrier deck. You don't really need the CATOBAR system for that type of plane. Heavier types such as the F/A-18 D/E/F do need it though, along with the recently retired F-14.

  • @shadowblade145: The Skyhawk could easily take off simply using the whole carrier deck. You don't really need the CATOBAR system for that type of plane. Heavier types such as the F/A-18 D/E/F do need it though, along with the recently retired F-14. Also, he DOES use the arrester wires - that's the funny jerk of the plane at approx. 4:29 when it looks like it's dancing on the landing strip!! :-P

    @TexFilms: Just an F.Y.I, this is a tad outdated as you do realise the F-4 Skyhawk is retired?

  • @NobleKorhedron That was not the F-4, that was the T-45 Goshawk rather. And no, he wasn't using his hook. He did use the arrestor wire, but it did not show his hook down. Maybe it was just FS recorder, but it's still unrealistic the way he stopped. And the skyhawk still COULD use the CATOBAR system, it was just a tad overkill.

  • @shadowblade145: I KNOW it COULD and for that matter, DID use it I'm just pointing out that you wouldn't really need it. The CATOBAR system was really invented to get the large amout of planes on a carrier off the deck in a reaosonable time. Otherwise in a combat situation the ships could potentially be sunk with their aircraft unlaunched!!

  • @NobleKorhedron Wow, nice response time, and again, they DID use it, and he did not. Which makes it a bit unrealistic. And also, this is not the F-4.

    (MIG 28s! No ones been this close before!)

    Sorry thought that was needed.

  • @shadowblade145: O.K, just an F.Y.I, I wasn't disuputing the part about it not being an F-4. I had forgotten about the advanced trainers such as the T-45. I guess I just assumed that ship was in a potential combat zone. So I assumed, rightfully so, I.M.O, that you wouldn't have trainers on a ship heading into a combat zone!!

  • @NobleKorhedron No, you wouldn't.  Unless we were REALLY REALLY desperate. Then maybe. But I still doubt it. And hey, it could have been in a combat zone for all we know, this guy really had no idea what the hell he was doing 0_0

    "That's a big gamble with a 30 million dollar plane."

  • Thanks! :)

  • ur gay asshole

  • were did you get the aircraft cariar

  • @jdognh Flight Sim Nation Alpha Carrier, google it

  • 2:15 pirates flag!!!

  • what video capture device do you use? Your footage has amazing quality! Love the vids

  • Captured with Fraps, rendered with Sony Vegas Divx 720p

  • I don't see the high-tension cable but I still see the plane being pulled back.

  • Also, I noticed you were flying around Ascension Island,was that a reference to Wideawake International?

  • Hey man, really great video! How do you get all the angels when you shoot the video? xD

  • i have this Aircraft Carrier, stinks that i have to pilot it

  • Nice work, especially for a rush job! Good choice of music too. :-)

  • Thanks!

  • in your related videos theres a silent hunteer 4 video. you nobiously dont have any trouble with it, but i have silent hunter 2 and its nothing but trouble, can anyone elsse say they have these problems ps tex u can fly really well

  • Couldn't say mate, I've never played SH2, sorry I couldn't help. Thanks for watching my films though!

  • I love your videos Tex, keep them up!!

  • Thanks mate :)

  • I love multiplayer carrier ops! :D What's your FSX Gamespy?

  • Tex, I have two questions for ya.

    -Are you going to be in this week's session? You've only been in two of them so far.

    -Are we doing something like this again? It looks like fun, shame I missed it.

  • I might be here Saturday afternoon, more likely on Sunday though. Have to wait and see what plans the girlfriend might have for us already.

  • nice one tex as always ur vids are really well created and edited wouldnt expect anything better from you :)

  • Thank you! This one came out pretty good considering I made it in just a few hours so the guys would have something to watch at the end of the day. :)

  • Just when I was planning to use that song on one of my upcoming videos.

    So, this is the O-F server - looks fun. I was unable to get onto it when I tried in FS9, unfortunately.

    This is definitely different than your other videos.

  • Yea it was a lot of fun! This was my first attempted at filming a multiplayer session. The server is up every weekend and we usually meet in the afternoon (US Time) on Saturday.

    Thanks for watching, sorry I used the song you planned to use, but no reason you can't still use it. :D

  • the first ever tuch and go on a carrier do by a 747

  • haha for sure! Thanks for watching mate.

  • I love that Carrier I'm friend with the guy who made it, took more than one person, well forums friends..lol

    Great video! and Song.

  • Well tell him we greatly appreciate it! We had a lot of fun using it. :D

  • il 747 te lo potevi anche risparmiare !!!!!!

  • Amazing video man.

    Can you please tell me the name of the music?

    Thanks!

  • Iron Maiden - Aces High

  • Thanks !

  • Thanks! See the comment by btb300 which answered the question already. :)

  • You can't launch off this carrier so like all others, it's just eye candy and no point of landing when you have to BS takeoff, meaning no working CATS and dropping off deck about 20 feet after takeoff. Really what's the point. Witch I'm guessing with limitations in FSX you can't make it luanchable, knowing this is the MAIN thing to carrier operation and the funnest part why make something a leave that part out. Carrier looks good but like all others it a dud that offers 50%.

  • its just a video having a laugh, if you want to have it look realistic why dont you go get your liscence and join the navy

  • Was never talking about the video, as always Tex's vid are always good. I was talking about the Carrier. And will say again in hope you understand. Yes it is fun to land on a carrier in FS. But launching off is something that is always missed. I need not join the NAVY, that's just a dumb suggestion. And it's also dumb to simulate carrier takeoff by just flying off the deck. This video is cool 100% but the carrier only gives you 50% the the experience.

  • Ok i get you now, i thought you were saying the video was crap, sorry.

    I thought you were saying whats the point of making an unrealistic video, so i said if you want realistic go do it for real. sorry mate

  • Thanks for being a fan! ;)

  • I understand you, too. Maybe Tex modified the aircraft parameters to get unrealistic performances. But I also don't think that this makes it a bad video. A new, funny idea. Thanks for this video.

  • Thanks for watching!

    Actually I didn't modify any aircraft. I did however speed up some of the clips in the video for effect. We were all laughing and having a good time making this one, especially watching the planes drop after take-off, then Sammy gets the idea to attempt a 747 landing..lol!! xD

  • Thanks for watching. I understand your frustration about the catapults not working. On the other hand, launching off the deck is rather mundane compared to landing it, so I am happy just to have a carrier which works in MP where someone can drive it allowing other people to land on it at the same time. It's a lot of fun, regardless if the catapults work or not. :D

  • Nice Tex!

    5*

  • Nice!

  • Hey man, thanks for watching!

  • Looks like fun! 5/5

  • Thanks, it is! :)

  • sorry 4 double post.....but what kind of computer do you have that can run this game on the highest settings AND record??

  • 3.4 Ghz duel core, 2GB RAM, 8800 Nvidia GTX. The graphics actually aren't maxed out, I turned them down a bit for multiplayer.

  • another spectacular film......what program do u use for editing? like at the beginning you have that live camera view which is very cool! also 1st comment on an excellent video!!!

  • Thank you. I edit with Sony Vegas 8. That is the tv simulator effect.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more