Did they blur the tits on the show, or is it some weird YouTube after-effect? They have naked people on the show all the time... so I guess blurring boobs for a breast hysteria episode would be kinda funny.
If you are a truth seeker, search "Truth Contest" in Google and click on the 1st result, then open The Present and read what it says. Everyone needs to see this. The Present will turn this world right-side up if it reaches enough people. You will see what I mean when you read the first page.
There is quite the difference between the africans showing off their rags and then Paris Hilton. Hilton is a bimbo who signals entirely different things straight to the western countries which the youth picks well up on. African boobs.. A different culture and different signals, which aren't even aimed at us.
who the hell thought they had the right to censor master peices of european fine art ?
any sensoring of this type is considered stupid beyond belief by most western european people and never happens......................only in america ..............think on.
CBS you suck! Breasts are a natural thing and everyone in the world knows what they look like. And these were only paintings of breasts for crying out loud! Why bother censor?
For me, in normal depictions, breasts, vagina, and penises are considered sacred in sexual procreation. Life is given to a child through breast milk, the child is born from a vagina, and a child's half seed is from a penis. Why then aren't men's nipples covered? They don't (as often) give milk, and play important roles in the sacred gift of human life. This of course is out of the idea of pornography, which is a perverted illusion.
@Gargomon251 The FCC only regulates broadcast and radio content. Shotime, being a cable network, could show pornography or extreme hardcore professional wrestling if it wanted to.
in finland we get to sauna together with sister and mothers. i have seen tits all my life and i have no proplem. its crazy how everybody thinks that men are just horny animals.
its just like videogames ok, let your kids murder torture disembowel mutilate human figures but the minute a titty is shown or a sex scene its all over the news like wtf?
Let's put it this way: All women have breasts. When girls grow up they're going to have them and see them every day. When boys grow up they're going to see their girlfriend's breasts. When all people are babies they see their mother's breasts. To all the prudes who think tits are taboo - fuck you. Get over yourself. There's nothing wrong it it. They're a part of the human anatomy.
@hyuugaamida cause when you take risks, some bumbling goody-two-shoe will make a big fuss about it instead of not watching it and ruin the fun for the rest of us
ONLY in america would they sensour and paint over classical paintings like these.. Even in a program called bullshit where they swear freely and the topic is exactly the fear of nakedness in public.
those Africans r not poor, they r tribals.. they dont believe in greed yet, its strange how it caught in some tribes while some still live naturally in the forest..
@JACKtheRIPP3R189 So if your not participating in a race and you get accused of being a loser would that make sense? No. Only if you believe in the concept of market,trade and money it makes sense to call you poor becoz you tried and did not get enough of the pie.. But if your of the grid and live of the forest which is a different system and dont care then they are what they are..tribals. You dont call eskimos poor they dont fall in the category of trying to acquire wealth. They dont want it.
@KarthikSoun It's an inequal analogy. A race is an event, poor is a description of a state of being. If you have nothing of value then you are economically poor. Yeah i would call eskimos poor. By your logic unemployed people aren't poor because they're not participating. The relevant definition of poor is: a: lacking material possessions b : of, relating to, or characterized by poverty
@JACKtheRIPP3R189 Havent you heard of the rat race?Its an perfect analogy. Poor is not an description of a state of "being",its description of how much you have and this description is not valid if you never heard of the rich.They never had rich people in their society they never tried to earn money or trade.Its far more unfair analogy if you include them in our race.They are not "participants",an unemployed person is part of the system he is an participant and is still trying to get a job.
@KarthikSoun Right, so if you don't have shit, like these tribals, then you're poor. The haves and the have nots have existed before there was currency. They're super poor. It's not a "race" it's a description of how much you've got, and they don't have jack shit. Maybe they like living that way, that's cool with me, they're still poor. Who says they are? Lots of unemployed people just sponge off of welfare indefinitely, or become bums and don't even try. Are bums not poor then?
@JACKtheRIPP3R189 See your not raising an valid argument,your just repeating what you started without logic.Even ur born with anything you just earn or inherit possessions in order to feel secure.Whether these possessions make you feel secure is an different debate but if some tribes did not believe in that method right from the beginning then they r what they have always been, "their tribe"! Tribal still has to collect wood,hunt,feed his children he has no welfare,bum does not work. Get that?
@KarthikSoun Except what i said in the first place was correct, so it doesn't need to be changed, that's the beauty of getting it right the first time. No. You earn possessions to make your life easier and/or more comfortable. It doesn't matter what they believe, perception is not reality. If you have nothing of value, you are by definition poor. You said that they "did not participate" bums don't either. They still have to scrounge for food and collect scrap to burn to keep warm. Get that?
@JACKtheRIPP3R189 This is like arguing with an arrogant kid. Sitting in a little country like USA what would you know about the out side world! Nothing. You havent even meet ppl outside ur town. so there is no point argueing with someone who throws away logic and argues for the sake of his position. good bye.
@KarthikSoun So you're admitting that what you said was baseless. I defended my point with evidence, you did not, you just kept repeating something stupid. I've been to more countries than you, i'm quite sure of that sport. You didn't support your case with logic, you said something moronic, and then just repeated that you're right. Now you have nothing but to attack me instead of my point. Guess what genius, when you argue you espouse a position, that's the whole point.
@JACKtheRIPP3R189 So this what is wrong with your conditioning. You cant seem to see ppl beyond your societies condition of rich and poor. Where there haves and have not with the Abroginals of australia? So if you where born an abroginal would you call someone rich or would you call the new christian immrigants as greedy? Dont be arrogant, christians and muslims always think what they say is the right and truth and call others savages and kafirs.
@KarthikSoun Rich and poor isn't a matter of conditioning, it's a matter of the definition of a word. Some Aborigines undoubtedly had more than others. Having nothing of value means that you are poor. Wanting a more comfortable life doesn't make you greedy. I'm an atheist, i couldn't care less what religious buffoons think on the subject, they believe in invisible sky wizards.
@JACKtheRIPP3R189 There is no proof that some aboriginals had more than others. Where is the proof for your argument? or had an word for rich! You still hv the christian culture in you,everything is just good or bad,rich and poor,black and white.Ur a christian without jesus thats all. Such narrow definitions does not give you an excuse to drag others to your game. If someone is not part takeing in ur Drama would he still hv a character in the play?Haveing money is part of ur play not his.
@KarthikSoun You must be joking. There is no proof that they had the same amount either. It is the way of life that some will always have more than others. No, i do not have anything "christian" in me, i am an atheist, whether you like it or not. Religion is for fools. A play is something that reenacts a scenario, real or fictional. the definition of poor is lacking in material wealth, tribals do not have wealth, meaning they are poor. Like i said, bums don't participate either, and they're poor
@JACKtheRIPP3R189 I am not jokeing,where is your proof that those ppl belong to our structure and they have rich abrogianls among them?I am an athiest too but i am hindu by culture.Even Dawkins and Denate say thy are christians by culture thats part of their upbringing,you must be unique by birth or your not understanding in depth.There r tribals in india and hinduism is over 5000 yrs old we never called them hindus and they never lived in our cities.Only christians wont understand this divide.
@KarthikSoun Where is your proof that they all had equal amounts of everything? You need to back that up with evidence. You couldn't even get Dennett's name right, and you expect me to believe he's a christian "by culture"? I was brought up by atheists. I'm not calling them savages or inferior, i'm calling them poor. Many of them probably prefer to live that way, but by the dictionary definition of the word, they are poor, they don't have anything of value.
@JACKtheRIPP3R189 You dont even know Dawkins said he is christian by culture!! What if i prove that would you shut up? How old ru?Since u came back empty now u want me to prove the obvious.What does being rich mean?Acquiring more resources?Can a man live without taking more apart from food,water,shelter? If he can then its only a method and ur using words invented in that system,Not haveing is not considered poverty for them,it is for u. Did Aboriginals consider themselves poor? So who ru?
How can you be "christian by culture"? You are either christian or you are not. You're the one who claims that all aborigines had the exact same amount of everything, that's a ridiculous claim, it demands that you provide evidence. Your claim is the one that requires substantiation, not mine. Poor does not mean "lacking in necessities" it means having a lack of material wealth, which tribals do. It doesn't matter what they consider themselves, people don't get to write their own reviews.
@JACKtheRIPP3R189 Its not my job to educate you, go ask dawkins or j.krishnamurthi who have more patients to explain and educate you! Now u found out Dawkins said that and ur hiding that. You neither have intellectual honesty or courage which is important in a discussion.
Your thought patterns are created by culture and u live in a christian country, you cant escape it. There is no you apart from that conditioned pattern, Rich and poor r part of that pattern.Nothing belongs to u in reality.
You're not sufficiently educated to teach me anything. So you're saying you don't have evidence, because you can't be bothered with reality or truth. I couldn't care less if Dawkins said it or not, it doesn't make it a valid statement. Yawn, your thought patterns (or lack thereof) consist of the logical absurdity that because people choose not to participate in modern economics they are not poor. Since poor has nothing to do with whether you participate or not, your objections are irrelevant.
@JACKtheRIPP3R189 You dont seem to even know the difference between abstract human concepts and reality. How can u be an atheist! Let me make it simpler, In reality we dont own anything, we are not born with anything. So if a man says he owns an rock which has been there even before humanity its an mental concept! Or does it belong to him? Its only an idea created by some human mind. These possessions r mental concepts that dont exist without the idea or thought.
@KarthikSoun Say what? Since we're talking about human concepts that seems to be precisely relevant to the point. People who have nothing of worth are poor. It doesn't matter if they choose not to participate or not, they're poor either way. You're trying to have it both ways, you're saying that it's only a human concept, so human concepts don't count when they're applied to people who disagree. It's a total logical trainwreck mate.
@JACKtheRIPP3R189 "so human concepts don't count when they're applied to people who disagree." Yes it does not count, Let me put it in simpler terms, would you call an Democrat and Republican?Why not? Because both disagree on method and policy, which are ideas! People will laugh at u if u try to convince them the other way! Human ideas are abstractions not reality!Can you claim Jupiter is yours? Why not? Same way Abroginals did not pick up our system of measurement of wealth, which an idea.
Sure they do, concepts are decided by society as a whole. Disagreeing with the fact that having no material wealth makes you poor doesn't stop you from being poor. I wouldn't call a democrat a republican for the same reason i wouldn't call bill gates a poor person, because he doesn't represent the definition of the word. I really don't care if morons laugh at me, they're morons, so it's not like their opinions matter. If they don't have material wealth they're poor, nothing else need be said.
@JACKtheRIPP3R189 Society was not whole. Do you atleast know when Australia was discovered by Europeans? They where isolated for 40,000 years or more. So how can say society as an whole? lol.. and how old are you seriously?
@JACKtheRIPP3R189 Moreover this no about you and me, this about condemning an whole bunch of ppl to savagery becoz they dont follow the reward of our monetary system. This is an christian plot to show them as lost souls and then send missionaries to save them! If your an Athiest you would understand this divide of cultures, If indian and western cultures are not the same then tribal culture is diffrent to.
@stargateproductions I think they did that so youtube wouldn't take it down. I don't think it was in the original show like that, because they've shown titties, real bouncing ones, on the show before.
@theNorris69 Sorry. My mistake. I thought that "Showtime" (the source of this vid) was an American television channel. Thanks for sharing your knowledge.
@usaisadump - As any American teen will tell you, you can see lots of breasts on the Showtime channel lol. But seriously, the original airing (and dvd+Netflix showing) of this series is uncensored. CBS (the station that is running this YT channel we are watching this clip on) has censored the vid. Broadcast networks in the US try to keep things pg-13 and under.
@matrixbarf In Canada, after 10pm pretty much anything goes. They insert the usual "warnings" after each block of ads, but everything generally runs uncut and uncensored. "9 1/2 weeks" or "Wild Orchid" type stuff would be considered tame when compared to some of the stuff I've seen on late night Canuck network TV. Also, I've noticed that when someone flips the bird on American TV...it gets "pixelated" by the censors. Strange!
@usaisadump - Yeah, I've noticed that pretty much every other country (except the US) is pretty lenient when it comes to what comes on television. You should try watching the version of Scarface that they show on Turner Broadcasting. You will die a little on the inside ;p
@matrixbarf I get Turner here in Toronto. Holy crap! I would not even tune it in for "Scarface." After Teddy was done cutting it up, the flick would be 25 minutes long! My oldest is 5...so Turner might have its uses for her...but certainly not for mommy and daddy. I wonder if he's going to start editing out hockey fights next year...ha!
Not to mention how it's considered totally okay to show death and destruction and bodies on the news, but a nude body? Nah, too graphic for the kiddies.
Your comment reminded me of an episode of South Park... when one of the kids had a ninga star stuck in his eye (or something like that) and nobody gave a damn, because Cartman showed up naked in a crowd.
@usaisadump Yes, we sell guns to teens... as long as they've been a teen for 5 years, and haven't committed a felony or violent crime.
Don't get me wrong... i think all this crap about being scared / embarrassed of the human body is stupid... unless you've got a small penis... like me ; )
Did they blur the tits on the show, or is it some weird YouTube after-effect? They have naked people on the show all the time... so I guess blurring boobs for a breast hysteria episode would be kinda funny.
muraalia 2 months ago
@muraalia Probably youtube blurring shit. There's plenty of nudity on Bullshit.
shockofhyperbole 1 month ago
those poor poor breasts XD
Jaepup 3 months ago
It's 2011 and we still blur breasts? Are we evolving or devolving?
YouGotWoodRolled 3 months ago 5
@YouGotWoodRolled blame the freak'n FCC. I have no prob, with breasts!
darksamurai2005 2 months ago
all hail the divine boob XD
killercookie777 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you are a truth seeker, search "Truth Contest" in Google and click on the 1st result, then open The Present and read what it says. Everyone needs to see this. The Present will turn this world right-side up if it reaches enough people. You will see what I mean when you read the first page.
vividDC 4 months ago
I view breasts very respectfully as well.
Killedkennyagain 4 months ago
who the fuck made Paris Hilton a role model!??!?!?
MrByy 4 months ago 6
There is quite the difference between the africans showing off their rags and then Paris Hilton. Hilton is a bimbo who signals entirely different things straight to the western countries which the youth picks well up on. African boobs.. A different culture and different signals, which aren't even aimed at us.
ZeonGenesis 4 months ago
Hi, I'm Marilyn Yalom, author of The Book of Boob.
SHRAPTOR 5 months ago
Usually, the first thing a baby sees are female tits...how are breasts destroying youth? If that is true, then we are all corrupted.
riverlioness 5 months ago 5
Blur the tits, keep the 5 year old's dick. Good job.
MrCorpseGrinder88 6 months ago 8
@MrCorpseGrinder88 It would have been better if they blurred the dick and kept the tits, I like tits.
Killedkennyagain 4 months ago
Boobs are awesome.
Seiryuu270 6 months ago
The Egyptians in......Ancient Egypt. NO SHIT
WH1T3YHD 6 months ago
@WH1T3YHD It's probably best they specify. Egyptians do exist today.
1poissonfish 6 months ago 7
@WH1T3YHD There are Egyptians in modern Egypt you know. Saying 'The Egyptians' does not automatically reference Ancient Egypt.
Killedkennyagain 4 months ago
Does anyone else think that the woman at 1:13 looks like Joan Rivers?
FatherTime89 7 months ago
/watch?v=BfBlRfAw-bA
Psych0Zach 7 months ago
thumbs up if you just were bored and typed in breasts
uncommonskiII 8 months ago
They blurred out the sketch on the wall, but it looks like her twat is showing. 1:28
aardvark9100 8 months ago
hi im a 13 yr old lol
teenmagican 9 months ago
Who the f*** considers Paris Hilton a role model anymore anyway?
neoYTPism 10 months ago 4
@neoYTPism People who employ sarcasm, for one.
KingOfKatamari 9 months ago
I agree, but to be fair, Paris Hilton is a stupid spoiled whore, so of course anything related to her would be seen as sexual.
nurb101 10 months ago
censorship. prude americans
TheCowboySantos 1 year ago 3
I'd like to know exactly whom it is that is being "protected" from viewing breasts in this video by blurring them out. Children, I would assume. (?)
But if you think about it, isn't it determined by our own biological make-up that children are naturally INTENDED to see breasts?
PreCodeMovies 1 year ago
@PreCodeMovies In the U.S., when it comes to the body or sex, trying to use logic will get you NOWHERE fast. Unfortunately.
Onneff69 11 months ago
They censored the breasts because it may be like pornography. But if a boy's penis is shown, it's human nature. WOW
MrDolla929 1 year ago
@MrDolla929 Blame youtube for that, Showtime doesn't censor out nudity.
FatherTime89 9 months ago 2
You mustn't show a breast unless it's all sliced up by a psycho--then it's violence and that's OK.
hatemorethanyou999 1 year ago
There you go folks..your Puritan society in action!
ClintL63 1 year ago 3
Breasts feed your children and fended you before. Without them we would be all dead. And they are censored?
Kelol100 1 year ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
Online dating brides benaughtyman.info
malkamanjali 1 year ago
I love the fact that they blur out the breasts but not the penis or the three vaginas they showed. FAIL!
invaderzimrules132 1 year ago 113
@invaderzimrules132 Why the fuck is anything blurred out, it's not porn!
Flabtato 9 months ago
@invaderzimrules132 Ahem, Win! That is why they blocked the breasts so they could show the vaginas!
00anvil11md 8 months ago
...did they just blur the breasts on the paintings but not the vaginas...?
Right. I'm going to guess this is like how Penn didn't swear in the "Profanity" epsiode.
IoEstasCedonta 1 year ago 5
Did they blur the pieces of art ironically?
whothewu 1 year ago
I love boobies!
somedudeinva 1 year ago 3
This is probably the breast episode of penn & teller.
mew6112 1 year ago 120
This has been flagged as spam show
@mew6112 what makes you think that
jeezusallahchrist 2 months ago
At 1:57 the breasts (behind the speaker) are blurred out, but the vagina is not. How uncommon.
k3n54n 1 year ago 4
who the hell thought they had the right to censor master peices of european fine art ?
any sensoring of this type is considered stupid beyond belief by most western european people and never happens......................only in america ..............think on.
rillar100 1 year ago
45 seconds in, they blur the boobs but not the kids penis O.o
EsotericSanity 1 year ago
CBS is fucking pathetic
Slacktoo 1 year ago 5
breastfeeding is natural
MaddDogg81 1 year ago
CBS is run by and sponsored by women. and so is the FCC
jonanlsh 1 year ago
I like boobies, big ones little even ones with chickenpox. I like boobies what kind of guys don't like boobies.........
birdhunter67 1 year ago
CBS you suck! Breasts are a natural thing and everyone in the world knows what they look like. And these were only paintings of breasts for crying out loud! Why bother censor?
vilssonify 1 year ago 5
stupid American prudery blurring pieces of art. it is just ridiculous
hackebeil20 1 year ago
I LOVE BOOBIES
AresCassell 1 year ago 2
@AresCassell BUT DO BOOBIES LOVE YOU BACK?
TheUnbeholden 1 year ago
@TheUnbeholden sometimes
AresCassell 1 year ago
Censored paintings is Bullshit!!!
frj73 1 year ago
tv has gone to hell.
johntrebec 1 year ago 3
@johntrebec Tv.. go to hell.
TheUnbeholden 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You can't have a mature discussion of breasts and visually censor them at the same time. Pitiful.
ImSpartacus811 1 year ago
You can't have a mature disccusion of breasts and visually censor them at the same time. Pitiful.
ImSpartacus811 1 year ago 5
The hypocrisy of pixellating nipples on this video is just amazing.
Davidkevin 1 year ago 3
Hey Penn get aids and die!
yada147258 1 year ago
@yada147258 By all means you first. Lead by example.
Mattysmyth0593 1 year ago
@Mattysmyth0593 you and that fat fuck teller and penn need to get aids and die
yada147258 1 year ago
I think chicks without lice is still hot these days haha
clay180 1 year ago
I like how breasts were seen as a sign of something wonderful back in the olden days. Now, it is seen as something bad. What is up with that?
redheadedsailor07 1 year ago
@RabbitGangsta you're 12 and you dont know what tits are? your parents are failing you kid...
weeMAN1300 1 year ago
i'm 12 and what is this?
RabbitGangsta 1 year ago
I love how they had to blur out the NAKED ART TITS.
nelsonrn 1 year ago
Is this show still on today?
Dailybabble 1 year ago
HAHAHAHAH ITS A ROLE MODEL DESTROYING OUR YOUTH ELOHEL
fantum999 1 year ago 2
SOOOOOOO TRUE, Brittny Spears vs Nat Geo? cultural relativist hypocracy anybody?
akgregor 1 year ago
For me, in normal depictions, breasts, vagina, and penises are considered sacred in sexual procreation. Life is given to a child through breast milk, the child is born from a vagina, and a child's half seed is from a penis. Why then aren't men's nipples covered? They don't (as often) give milk, and play important roles in the sacred gift of human life. This of course is out of the idea of pornography, which is a perverted illusion.
Coshka77 1 year ago
speaking of "boobs" anyone notice the idiots shown to the right who were against Walmart workers???
03KERMIT 1 year ago
So...breasts are censored in art but not genitalia and the pubes in that mural behind the blonde woman?
LilLuna1985 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
So why the fuck are you blocking out the breasts? Hypocrisy
pabobfin 1 year ago
well in norway they arent so dangerouse on it, very many girls take of their tops when they lays in the sun ond stuff
SAKUshikimori 1 year ago
@SAKUshikimori WOW... next time i go on leave i know where I'm going!!!!! Norwegian girls is HOT : )
TopHatGuy682 1 year ago
what? i just watched some of this on tv and nothing was cencored...
SAKUshikimori 1 year ago
I find it funny that the breasts at 0:47 are censored, but the BOY PENIS is not.
Nice priorities there, fcc
Gargomon251 1 year ago 137
@Gargomon251 as opposed to girl penises?
mewmaster151 1 year ago
@mewmaster151 as opposed to MAN penises.
Gargomon251 1 year ago
@Gargomon251 CBS is run by homos
supressorgrid 1 year ago
@Gargomon251 Who cares about boys penis?
TheUnbeholden 1 year ago
@TheUnbeholden That's not the point he's trying to say.
RetartedWaffles 1 year ago
@Gargomon251 DICKS > CHICKS
pandamanana 1 year ago
@Gargomon251 So, the FCC is trying to turn us into boylovers? I knew the FCC was evil!
frostythewargod 1 year ago
@Gargomon251
BOY PENIS? WHAT IS THIS WORLD COMING TO
AnonPartyVan1 1 year ago 4
@Gargomon251 they must be homo.
Gameboykd 1 year ago
@Gargomon251 The FCC only regulates broadcast and radio content. Shotime, being a cable network, could show pornography or extreme hardcore professional wrestling if it wanted to.
Anotora 1 year ago
@Anotora And they do, I suppose, but still, it seems like a strange sense of priorities either way.
Gargomon251 1 year ago
@Gargomon251 In honestly, I didn't notice the penis. Perhaps it was that small.
scw55 11 months ago
Did CBS really have the censor out fine art because of the nudity? lol
lychicambess 1 year ago 145
@lychicambess , I think it wasn't cbs. It think it supposed to be funny.
dalahast06 1 year ago
@lychicambess
i kinda felt that that was a planned joke. given the whole point and all .... O.o
xXTiberiusXx 1 year ago
@xXTiberiusXx I would get that, except this clip is courtesy of CBS, the P&T version is uncensored.
lychicambess 1 year ago
@lychicambess I saw that too and thought it was a really stupid, stupid, stupid thing to do.
christo930 1 year ago
Everybody is beautiful.
rainbowIchigo 1 year ago
@rainbowIchigo Except for you, you're just plain hideous.
hornet579 1 year ago
@hornet579
thanks! i try to keep up with the daily trends to be accepted by people I could give two shits about like yourself
rainbowIchigo 1 year ago
@rainbowIchigo It's called a joke? Damn, get a sense of humor, jackass!
hornet579 1 year ago
There is a thing called "society".
And in most of our societies, naked breasts are a no-go.
BeatPeet 1 year ago
@BeatPeet Someone's missing the point... :v
Lioyd1rving 1 year ago
LOL.. I'm finding it hilarious that only the boobs were blurred but not the crack at 0:59 ... unless I'm just seeing things that aren't there?
LunaGer 1 year ago
in finland we get to sauna together with sister and mothers. i have seen tits all my life and i have no proplem. its crazy how everybody thinks that men are just horny animals.
gooddarkjedi 1 year ago
Why are the tits blurred out?
omenroc1 1 year ago
SHO isn't showing breasts? Don't they show porn movies at times?
redhairmarimo 1 year ago
its just like videogames ok, let your kids murder torture disembowel mutilate human figures but the minute a titty is shown or a sex scene its all over the news like wtf?
ShroomSamich 1 year ago
What ? They censored old artwork ? LOL :)
There are no limits to stupidity are there ?
BelieveNoGod 1 year ago
Behind her on the wall, that reminds me of A Clockwork Orange.
StickWarrior 1 year ago
Let's put it this way: All women have breasts. When girls grow up they're going to have them and see them every day. When boys grow up they're going to see their girlfriend's breasts. When all people are babies they see their mother's breasts. To all the prudes who think tits are taboo - fuck you. Get over yourself. There's nothing wrong it it. They're a part of the human anatomy.
Ryuzaki492008 1 year ago
Shit I can identify, breasts make me hysterical aswell.
mrdaym 1 year ago
WTF you don't censor art for nudity--it's art!
hyuugaamida 1 year ago
@hyuugaamida
It's because gay dumb people all over the world (gay as in dumb, not gay) would whine and get offended or some stupid shit.
rakuencallisto 1 year ago
@hyuugaamida cause when you take risks, some bumbling goody-two-shoe will make a big fuss about it instead of not watching it and ruin the fun for the rest of us
Ele3tricEye 1 year ago
@Ele3tricEye touché
hellborned 1 year ago
Why is the art cencored? "Oh, my God! A painted body! Our children will be traumatized!" I mean, seriously... what's the harm?
PS: The only places in the world, as far as I know, that cencores paintings and sculptures are America and the Middle East...
MrAmorphous 1 year ago
You can see vag in the background art, but the breasts are blurred...
ShadeDracos 1 year ago
ONLY in america would they sensour and paint over classical paintings like these.. Even in a program called bullshit where they swear freely and the topic is exactly the fear of nakedness in public.
Janusha 1 year ago
i agree, porn is porn.
TheCanaanknight 1 year ago
till this day we still adore the TIT
cultivator23 1 year ago
Good point, Penn...
...but then consider that if boobs were shown all the time, they would eventually cease to add to a woman's feminine mystique...
QuartuvLarry 1 year ago
those Africans r not poor, they r tribals.. they dont believe in greed yet, its strange how it caught in some tribes while some still live naturally in the forest..
KarthikSoun 1 year ago
@KarthikSoun "r not poor"
Not having any money or any goods of value makes you poor. they might love their lives, but they're poor as it comes.
JACKtheRIPP3R189 1 year ago
@JACKtheRIPP3R189 So if your not participating in a race and you get accused of being a loser would that make sense? No. Only if you believe in the concept of market,trade and money it makes sense to call you poor becoz you tried and did not get enough of the pie.. But if your of the grid and live of the forest which is a different system and dont care then they are what they are..tribals. You dont call eskimos poor they dont fall in the category of trying to acquire wealth. They dont want it.
KarthikSoun 1 year ago
@KarthikSoun It's an inequal analogy. A race is an event, poor is a description of a state of being. If you have nothing of value then you are economically poor. Yeah i would call eskimos poor. By your logic unemployed people aren't poor because they're not participating. The relevant definition of poor is: a: lacking material possessions b : of, relating to, or characterized by poverty
JACKtheRIPP3R189 1 year ago
@JACKtheRIPP3R189 Havent you heard of the rat race?Its an perfect analogy. Poor is not an description of a state of "being",its description of how much you have and this description is not valid if you never heard of the rich.They never had rich people in their society they never tried to earn money or trade.Its far more unfair analogy if you include them in our race.They are not "participants",an unemployed person is part of the system he is an participant and is still trying to get a job.
KarthikSoun 1 year ago
@KarthikSoun Right, so if you don't have shit, like these tribals, then you're poor. The haves and the have nots have existed before there was currency. They're super poor. It's not a "race" it's a description of how much you've got, and they don't have jack shit. Maybe they like living that way, that's cool with me, they're still poor. Who says they are? Lots of unemployed people just sponge off of welfare indefinitely, or become bums and don't even try. Are bums not poor then?
JACKtheRIPP3R189 1 year ago
@JACKtheRIPP3R189 See your not raising an valid argument,your just repeating what you started without logic.Even ur born with anything you just earn or inherit possessions in order to feel secure.Whether these possessions make you feel secure is an different debate but if some tribes did not believe in that method right from the beginning then they r what they have always been, "their tribe"! Tribal still has to collect wood,hunt,feed his children he has no welfare,bum does not work. Get that?
KarthikSoun 1 year ago
@KarthikSoun Except what i said in the first place was correct, so it doesn't need to be changed, that's the beauty of getting it right the first time. No. You earn possessions to make your life easier and/or more comfortable. It doesn't matter what they believe, perception is not reality. If you have nothing of value, you are by definition poor. You said that they "did not participate" bums don't either. They still have to scrounge for food and collect scrap to burn to keep warm. Get that?
JACKtheRIPP3R189 1 year ago
@JACKtheRIPP3R189 This is like arguing with an arrogant kid. Sitting in a little country like USA what would you know about the out side world! Nothing. You havent even meet ppl outside ur town. so there is no point argueing with someone who throws away logic and argues for the sake of his position. good bye.
KarthikSoun 1 year ago
@KarthikSoun So you're admitting that what you said was baseless. I defended my point with evidence, you did not, you just kept repeating something stupid. I've been to more countries than you, i'm quite sure of that sport. You didn't support your case with logic, you said something moronic, and then just repeated that you're right. Now you have nothing but to attack me instead of my point. Guess what genius, when you argue you espouse a position, that's the whole point.
JACKtheRIPP3R189 1 year ago
@JACKtheRIPP3R189 So this what is wrong with your conditioning. You cant seem to see ppl beyond your societies condition of rich and poor. Where there haves and have not with the Abroginals of australia? So if you where born an abroginal would you call someone rich or would you call the new christian immrigants as greedy? Dont be arrogant, christians and muslims always think what they say is the right and truth and call others savages and kafirs.
KarthikSoun 1 year ago
@KarthikSoun Rich and poor isn't a matter of conditioning, it's a matter of the definition of a word. Some Aborigines undoubtedly had more than others. Having nothing of value means that you are poor. Wanting a more comfortable life doesn't make you greedy. I'm an atheist, i couldn't care less what religious buffoons think on the subject, they believe in invisible sky wizards.
JACKtheRIPP3R189 1 year ago
@JACKtheRIPP3R189 There is no proof that some aboriginals had more than others. Where is the proof for your argument? or had an word for rich! You still hv the christian culture in you,everything is just good or bad,rich and poor,black and white.Ur a christian without jesus thats all. Such narrow definitions does not give you an excuse to drag others to your game. If someone is not part takeing in ur Drama would he still hv a character in the play?Haveing money is part of ur play not his.
KarthikSoun 1 year ago
@KarthikSoun You must be joking. There is no proof that they had the same amount either. It is the way of life that some will always have more than others. No, i do not have anything "christian" in me, i am an atheist, whether you like it or not. Religion is for fools. A play is something that reenacts a scenario, real or fictional. the definition of poor is lacking in material wealth, tribals do not have wealth, meaning they are poor. Like i said, bums don't participate either, and they're poor
JACKtheRIPP3R189 1 year ago
@JACKtheRIPP3R189 I am not jokeing,where is your proof that those ppl belong to our structure and they have rich abrogianls among them?I am an athiest too but i am hindu by culture.Even Dawkins and Denate say thy are christians by culture thats part of their upbringing,you must be unique by birth or your not understanding in depth.There r tribals in india and hinduism is over 5000 yrs old we never called them hindus and they never lived in our cities.Only christians wont understand this divide.
KarthikSoun 1 year ago
@KarthikSoun Where is your proof that they all had equal amounts of everything? You need to back that up with evidence. You couldn't even get Dennett's name right, and you expect me to believe he's a christian "by culture"? I was brought up by atheists. I'm not calling them savages or inferior, i'm calling them poor. Many of them probably prefer to live that way, but by the dictionary definition of the word, they are poor, they don't have anything of value.
JACKtheRIPP3R189 1 year ago
@JACKtheRIPP3R189 You dont even know Dawkins said he is christian by culture!! What if i prove that would you shut up? How old ru?Since u came back empty now u want me to prove the obvious.What does being rich mean?Acquiring more resources?Can a man live without taking more apart from food,water,shelter? If he can then its only a method and ur using words invented in that system,Not haveing is not considered poverty for them,it is for u. Did Aboriginals consider themselves poor? So who ru?
KarthikSoun 1 year ago
How can you be "christian by culture"? You are either christian or you are not. You're the one who claims that all aborigines had the exact same amount of everything, that's a ridiculous claim, it demands that you provide evidence. Your claim is the one that requires substantiation, not mine. Poor does not mean "lacking in necessities" it means having a lack of material wealth, which tribals do. It doesn't matter what they consider themselves, people don't get to write their own reviews.
JACKtheRIPP3R189 1 year ago
@JACKtheRIPP3R189 Its not my job to educate you, go ask dawkins or j.krishnamurthi who have more patients to explain and educate you! Now u found out Dawkins said that and ur hiding that. You neither have intellectual honesty or courage which is important in a discussion.
Your thought patterns are created by culture and u live in a christian country, you cant escape it. There is no you apart from that conditioned pattern, Rich and poor r part of that pattern.Nothing belongs to u in reality.
KarthikSoun 1 year ago
You're not sufficiently educated to teach me anything. So you're saying you don't have evidence, because you can't be bothered with reality or truth. I couldn't care less if Dawkins said it or not, it doesn't make it a valid statement. Yawn, your thought patterns (or lack thereof) consist of the logical absurdity that because people choose not to participate in modern economics they are not poor. Since poor has nothing to do with whether you participate or not, your objections are irrelevant.
JACKtheRIPP3R189 1 year ago
@JACKtheRIPP3R189 You dont seem to even know the difference between abstract human concepts and reality. How can u be an atheist! Let me make it simpler, In reality we dont own anything, we are not born with anything. So if a man says he owns an rock which has been there even before humanity its an mental concept! Or does it belong to him? Its only an idea created by some human mind. These possessions r mental concepts that dont exist without the idea or thought.
KarthikSoun 1 year ago
@KarthikSoun Say what? Since we're talking about human concepts that seems to be precisely relevant to the point. People who have nothing of worth are poor. It doesn't matter if they choose not to participate or not, they're poor either way. You're trying to have it both ways, you're saying that it's only a human concept, so human concepts don't count when they're applied to people who disagree. It's a total logical trainwreck mate.
JACKtheRIPP3R189 1 year ago
@JACKtheRIPP3R189 "so human concepts don't count when they're applied to people who disagree." Yes it does not count, Let me put it in simpler terms, would you call an Democrat and Republican?Why not? Because both disagree on method and policy, which are ideas! People will laugh at u if u try to convince them the other way! Human ideas are abstractions not reality!Can you claim Jupiter is yours? Why not? Same way Abroginals did not pick up our system of measurement of wealth, which an idea.
KarthikSoun 1 year ago
Sure they do, concepts are decided by society as a whole. Disagreeing with the fact that having no material wealth makes you poor doesn't stop you from being poor. I wouldn't call a democrat a republican for the same reason i wouldn't call bill gates a poor person, because he doesn't represent the definition of the word. I really don't care if morons laugh at me, they're morons, so it's not like their opinions matter. If they don't have material wealth they're poor, nothing else need be said.
JACKtheRIPP3R189 1 year ago
@JACKtheRIPP3R189 Society was not whole. Do you atleast know when Australia was discovered by Europeans? They where isolated for 40,000 years or more. So how can say society as an whole? lol.. and how old are you seriously?
KarthikSoun 1 year ago
@JACKtheRIPP3R189 Moreover this no about you and me, this about condemning an whole bunch of ppl to savagery becoz they dont follow the reward of our monetary system. This is an christian plot to show them as lost souls and then send missionaries to save them! If your an Athiest you would understand this divide of cultures, If indian and western cultures are not the same then tribal culture is diffrent to.
KarthikSoun 1 year ago
They censored art . . wtf
stargateproductions 1 year ago 16
@stargateproductions I think they did that so youtube wouldn't take it down. I don't think it was in the original show like that, because they've shown titties, real bouncing ones, on the show before.
JACKtheRIPP3R189 1 year ago
Come to think of it, at around 0.43, they blur the breasts but not the small boy's penis.
Saiyne 1 year ago 4
They blurred the breasts in the paintings...
lol *rolls eyes*
Saiyne 1 year ago
British prudery is the cause of all this censorship and obviously expanded to every culture they ruled over. Damn Victorians.
godmode9 1 year ago 2
ye bullshit. that's like complaining about americans being fat because of the native americans 300 years ago
Alienmad462 1 year ago
Americans... so funny. They'll sell a gun to a teen, but they won't show a boobie on the tay-vay. Amusing.
usaisadump 1 year ago 11
Only rifles and shotguns. You have to be 21 to buy a handgun. ;)
Celemourn 1 year ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
Like I said: Americans... so funny. They'll sell a gun to a teen, but they won't show a boobie on the tay-vay. Amusing ;)
usaisadump 1 year ago
incase you didnt know this is youtube not tv
theNorris69 1 year ago
@theNorris69 Sorry. My mistake. I thought that "Showtime" (the source of this vid) was an American television channel. Thanks for sharing your knowledge.
usaisadump 1 year ago
@usaisadump - As any American teen will tell you, you can see lots of breasts on the Showtime channel lol. But seriously, the original airing (and dvd+Netflix showing) of this series is uncensored. CBS (the station that is running this YT channel we are watching this clip on) has censored the vid. Broadcast networks in the US try to keep things pg-13 and under.
matrixbarf 1 year ago
@matrixbarf In Canada, after 10pm pretty much anything goes. They insert the usual "warnings" after each block of ads, but everything generally runs uncut and uncensored. "9 1/2 weeks" or "Wild Orchid" type stuff would be considered tame when compared to some of the stuff I've seen on late night Canuck network TV. Also, I've noticed that when someone flips the bird on American TV...it gets "pixelated" by the censors. Strange!
usaisadump 1 year ago
@usaisadump - Yeah, I've noticed that pretty much every other country (except the US) is pretty lenient when it comes to what comes on television. You should try watching the version of Scarface that they show on Turner Broadcasting. You will die a little on the inside ;p
matrixbarf 1 year ago
@matrixbarf I get Turner here in Toronto. Holy crap! I would not even tune it in for "Scarface." After Teddy was done cutting it up, the flick would be 25 minutes long! My oldest is 5...so Turner might have its uses for her...but certainly not for mommy and daddy. I wonder if he's going to start editing out hockey fights next year...ha!
usaisadump 1 year ago
Not to mention how it's considered totally okay to show death and destruction and bodies on the news, but a nude body? Nah, too graphic for the kiddies.
MidgardEagle 1 year ago 3
@MidgardEagle
Your comment reminded me of an episode of South Park... when one of the kids had a ninga star stuck in his eye (or something like that) and nobody gave a damn, because Cartman showed up naked in a crowd.
usagi18 1 year ago
A FUCK A YOU.... BIIITCH!!
ImTheKobold 1 year ago
@ImTheKobold Get back to me when you graduate to the 2nd syllable.
usaisadump 1 year ago
@usaisadump Grad of '10 ... ASSHOLE!
ImTheKobold 1 year ago
@ImTheKobold 4 months ...
and you still don't get the joke.
Heh.
usaisadump 1 year ago
@usaisadump
Are you sure you got the right guy? Of all the stuff we've said, I was the only one joking :)
ImTheKobold 1 year ago
@usaisadump Yes, we sell guns to teens... as long as they've been a teen for 5 years, and haven't committed a felony or violent crime.
Don't get me wrong... i think all this crap about being scared / embarrassed of the human body is stupid... unless you've got a small penis... like me ; )
TopHatGuy682 1 year ago
@usaisadump we dont sell guns to teens fucking moron.
BlackHAwkdOwn2983 1 year ago
@BlackHAwkdOwn2983 Yes, you most certainly do sell guns to teens.
An 18 or 19 year old American may buy a gun whenever he or she wishes.
Just how fucking stupid are you?
usaisadump 1 year ago
@usaisadump Do guns kill more people than cigarettes?
7mattduser 1 year ago
@7mattduser No.
usaisadump 1 year ago
@usaisadump Do guns kill more people than bacon?
7mattduser 1 year ago