The Scientific Method

[RebeccaBieber105]

i will be fucking sac to go up that, wear his hat for that?

[Lioobayoyo]

you didn't explained the scientic method :(

[SnoweyMan111]

@Lioobayoyo

0:32-0:40 That's the core.

Then he doesn't explain it fully in a direct sense.

[human2011able]

@Lioobayoyo it appears that perhaps he doesn't clearly know scientific method scientifically

[kuto825]

WTF anita is insane man!!hes a fkin lunatic awesome!!!!

[anitabonghit123]

Feel My Wrath Of My Comments In this Utube

Ps SCIT2000 blows

[anitabonghit123]

I RULE THE UNIVERSE and your lunchbox

[anitabonghit123]

i rule

[Backofthekop]

I think this guy has just explained the major flaw in the human race rather than explain why science is so great. It is human instict to explore and answer unanswered questions. We have answered a lot of question within our own reach. We are running out of questions, and starting to try to answer questions which can't be answered. Trying to recreate the conditions of the big bang in the LHC is just an example. It's impossible to do so, because there is matter beyond the test space.

[nicemandan]

Is he climbing at The Roaches?

[slizard6]

I've heard the idea that a good scientists finds more questions rather than answers. Also thoughts, concepts, senses, feelings, and words are questionable.

[slizard6]

Or so Ive heard.

[slizard6]

Its kind of like the idea that any argument may have an equally powerful opposing side.

[slizard6]

The idea that there is equally powerful evidence to an opposing side of the story. Also the idea of the imagination and culture.

[slizard6]

I found this idea from those experienced in debate and arguing.

[vanzant004]

Try imagination and the world! It doesn't enter society but by the round about way of the world does allow us to do things that can influence coulture. Basicly it falls to the law that things do not do things people do!

[vanzant004]

That's debate, the problem is somebody has to draw a conclusion in the end or you do the same thing next time. With out the drawing of conclusions and the establishment for longitudenals we would and do go around in circles endlessly.

[slizard6]

I found the idea that feelings and senses were questionable when I read some of scientists questions about meditation.

[slizard6]

Theres also the idea that people are undefined like from the song "only you can feel the rain on your skin."

[vanzant004]

That's wonderful and true. But think of it like this the decissions that you make do count and do effect your life. It's starts early on around 12-14 when your intellect kicks in. Say you went to buy an apple and there they were one small and one big you must actually make that decission for the bigger one or else you get the other. This counts in everything. And will!

[vanzant004]

That is true because the more we understand the more think of questions, it's only natural.

[slizard6]

It looks like you might have a lot of sources that I could use, or this might be the memorized wisdom of someone who has their age as 61.

[vanzant004]

Science as a tool uses math.

Get back to it!

I think you'll like it!

If you dare!

Science is not quite what you said or even think but the thing you see in the old movies where the hero is busy working on a chalkboard and trying to finish his theory or tweak his weapon or solve the equation so he can tell the others what to do to save the world.

Sciencewas a tool that worked, AKA the egyptian square.

You ever do that thing, POST {finish} and you too can do it.

Try it!

[slizard6]

Hahaha, I saw you post that exact comment responding to other videos on the scientific method. Try listening to the guy and empathysing with his ideas.

[vanzant004]

Sorry! I've never posted that anywhere els!

Then what are you talking about?

I was emphisizing with the writer and only pointing out the existance of Sience the tool and it's replacement techneological analysis.

Do it yourself in your head, the difference is radical! And is something need in order to understand why and that were no longer using science; but don't even know it but technology.

[vanzant004]

Oh, that thing the scientest were doing on the chalk board was what you had in school called the 'Organic Ratio'. How to find the missing part, or in science how to prove that there are no missing parts; and thus that a thing does to work! Rad!! But that is it. The fact that science fact and immutable simplifies our understanding limits the worlds inegma and the darkness of ignorance and that just must not happen.

[slizard6]

Read your response.

[NearVSMello]

The answer to what "love," "hate," etc. really are might lie not in the science of neurology and psychology, but rather in the science of etymology or the derivation and origin of words and their lingual structure.

[slizard6]

lol Heard about that too, good comment.