That's correct, if you follow his weekly blog you would of been aware of sub-prime long before the American public could even spell it. People laughed then just as they shrug-off the topic of peak oil now...... the public have always been "insufferable fools" and are they in for a rude awakening!
If you read "The Long Emergency" you will also note that he predicted the collapse of the American Sub-Prime real estate market with startling accuracy.
Here is why we are doomed. Today I saw Nancy Pelosi Dem. rep from CA. Doing EXACTLY what we can expect from politicians. Asking the government to release its oil reserves to drive prices down. Only price will get anyone to conserve. But lowering costs/helping the poor pay for oil is a ticket to office. She says "Natural gas is the way to go. "It's Cheap abundant and clean unlike fossil fuels". Nobody has told her natural gas is a fossil fuel and is neither cheap abundant or "clean" it seems.
I agree completely with his forecasts on the economics of energy.
But if I am wrong, cheap, abundant energy will lead to unprecedented ecological collapse. More energy to muck up this worse than we already have? That's a chilling thought.
TonyKaku: Most of the "mucking up" has to do with antiquated, inefficient modes of energy production, namely the waste products from fossil fuels. A new, ecologically sound source of cheap energy will drastically decrease the need to "muck up."
Even with a non-polluting energy source, we would still have to change our consumptive lifestyles. We cannot continue to remove forests, degrade soils and consume resources on the scale we do now. Clean energy would be nice, but it is only part of the problem.
Oil isn't just about vehicules, it is also about powerplants, plastics, roads, clothes, cosmetics, soaps,fertilizers,medecines, everything that is even remoely related to oil will be affected!
Petroleum molecule DO have unique chemical assets that make them extraodinary.
So discovering a new energy source won't solve the problem!
Kunstler writes primarily about aesthetics and energy. His work on the former is brilliant, hysterically funny, profound and poetic, but I disagree completely with his forecasts on the economics of energy.
Energy is all around us, we just arent very good at capturing and storing it...not yet!
Remember, it actually costs 75% less to run a city car on electricity...in cents per mile.
Umm electricity and hyrogen and all mass moder economies need a mass easily moveable base of energy to run dude. That is what fossil fues do. The only thing that could replace it is fusion power, good luck with that.
Most of the energy "all around" us translates to electricity when it is captured. Electricity is not the same as liquid fuels. The living arrangement that Jim K. criticizes depends upon on liquid fuels, not electricity. And that is why it is unsustainable and "has no future".
The USSR collapsed because it failed to take human greed into account. Conversely, our undoing will be predicated on greed run rampant. This is exactly what Kunstler is taking about: our built environment is "not worth caring about" because it was "fabricated" with only one thing in mind - money.
I love this guy, but the ridiculous sepia visual echo on this clip is horrible! I would love to send this message to my skeptical friends, but the technical quality of this thing is embarassing.
If you were to show this video to most N. Americans, they would say our suburban lifestyle is great and doesn't need discussion. They do not see a reason to question their communities because that is all they know.
A dialog on this subject is long overdue. JH Kunstler is the most outspoken, unrelenting, upfront citic of the N. American suburban lifestyle. He's one of the few people who speak of how badly we've ruined our cities and doesn't sugarcoat his arguments a bit. Good job JHK. Keep making this an issue.
He says it like it is and never veers....
MrEnergyCzar 1 year ago
Kunstler is awesome; I dunno why more people don't listen to the man, he's one of our best IMO.
PeakOilCountdown 2 years ago 6
@PeakOilCountdown
I'm american, and love his messages. I spread the word as much as I can.
RomanV101 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
screw that - the suburbs rock !
florgat91 2 years ago
supersize city.
bananian 2 years ago
That's correct, if you follow his weekly blog you would of been aware of sub-prime long before the American public could even spell it. People laughed then just as they shrug-off the topic of peak oil now...... the public have always been "insufferable fools" and are they in for a rude awakening!
HALEYSABAI 2 years ago 4
If you read "The Long Emergency" you will also note that he predicted the collapse of the American Sub-Prime real estate market with startling accuracy.
drmodestoesq 3 years ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
Here is why we are doomed. Today I saw Nancy Pelosi Dem. rep from CA. Doing EXACTLY what we can expect from politicians. Asking the government to release its oil reserves to drive prices down. Only price will get anyone to conserve. But lowering costs/helping the poor pay for oil is a ticket to office. She says "Natural gas is the way to go. "It's Cheap abundant and clean unlike fossil fuels". Nobody has told her natural gas is a fossil fuel and is neither cheap abundant or "clean" it seems.
realsamwise 3 years ago 2
Not to mention she is a dumb cunt.
ALP5050 2 years ago
Not to mention the millitary industrial complex.
ehswan 3 years ago
a prophet. just like george carlin.
reallygonecat 3 years ago 2
I agree completely with his forecasts on the economics of energy.
But if I am wrong, cheap, abundant energy will lead to unprecedented ecological collapse. More energy to muck up this worse than we already have? That's a chilling thought.
TonyKaku 3 years ago 2
TonyKaku: Most of the "mucking up" has to do with antiquated, inefficient modes of energy production, namely the waste products from fossil fuels. A new, ecologically sound source of cheap energy will drastically decrease the need to "muck up."
yerk3 2 years ago
Even with a non-polluting energy source, we would still have to change our consumptive lifestyles. We cannot continue to remove forests, degrade soils and consume resources on the scale we do now. Clean energy would be nice, but it is only part of the problem.
TonyKaku 2 years ago 2
Oil isn't just about vehicules, it is also about powerplants, plastics, roads, clothes, cosmetics, soaps,fertilizers,medecines, everything that is even remoely related to oil will be affected!
Petroleum molecule DO have unique chemical assets that make them extraodinary.
So discovering a new energy source won't solve the problem!
GeoffreyRahl 1 year ago
Kunstler writes primarily about aesthetics and energy. His work on the former is brilliant, hysterically funny, profound and poetic, but I disagree completely with his forecasts on the economics of energy.
Energy is all around us, we just arent very good at capturing and storing it...not yet!
Remember, it actually costs 75% less to run a city car on electricity...in cents per mile.
Teller3448 3 years ago
Umm electricity and hyrogen and all mass moder economies need a mass easily moveable base of energy to run dude. That is what fossil fues do. The only thing that could replace it is fusion power, good luck with that.
Vice81 3 years ago 3
Most of the energy "all around" us translates to electricity when it is captured. Electricity is not the same as liquid fuels. The living arrangement that Jim K. criticizes depends upon on liquid fuels, not electricity. And that is why it is unsustainable and "has no future".
tgold1968 3 years ago 2
then we'll move farther away from cities b/c have the energy thus only prolonging the problem.
bananian 2 years ago
The USSR collapsed because it failed to take human greed into account. Conversely, our undoing will be predicated on greed run rampant. This is exactly what Kunstler is taking about: our built environment is "not worth caring about" because it was "fabricated" with only one thing in mind - money.
izmatics 3 years ago 4
I love this guy, but the ridiculous sepia visual echo on this clip is horrible! I would love to send this message to my skeptical friends, but the technical quality of this thing is embarassing.
muaytaps 4 years ago
This is THE issue facing America.
rastajah 4 years ago 3
That's right, but why is everyone so blind to it?? It's maddening.
izmatics 4 years ago
I'd like to recommend the movie "Manufactured Landscapes" to you and everyone else interested in this clip. It's a masterpiece. Peace.
rastajah 4 years ago
a lot are blind to it, but we are both watching it. thats something..
iaeruo 3 years ago 2
No, this the issue facing the whole world.
Puzzoozoo 3 years ago
Thanks for posting, very important.
eepee66 4 years ago
Never underestimate the power of denial.
He's right. No one will say these things. It serves no political or economic agenda. The whole setup is quite unsustainable. relocalize.
consume less, learn how to garden. see also richard heinberg
rvbarnesboy 4 years ago 3
kunstler is so right america is based on the car which wont continue to run , where I live in britain I can easy live without cars .
if your american move to places like this before its too late if you can
bearsagainstevil 4 years ago
If you were to show this video to most N. Americans, they would say our suburban lifestyle is great and doesn't need discussion. They do not see a reason to question their communities because that is all they know.
alanhowitzer 4 years ago 4
A dialog on this subject is long overdue. JH Kunstler is the most outspoken, unrelenting, upfront citic of the N. American suburban lifestyle. He's one of the few people who speak of how badly we've ruined our cities and doesn't sugarcoat his arguments a bit. Good job JHK. Keep making this an issue.
alanhowitzer 4 years ago 3
Thanks for posting these. I think Kunstler is a very important thinker for our times, there's very few like him.
Alacrates 4 years ago 3