I don't know if that's you're implying, but Europa itself isn't geologically active, Europa's interior is heated from tidal friction from Jupiter and the outer moons, which is why NASA believes that Europa contains liquid water in its interior. If it was geologically active itself, it isn't likely that the surface of the planet would be frozen. NASA also suspects that one of Saturn's moons is also undergoing this effect. The moon shoots geysers into Saturn's ring system.
You know Something going faster than the speed of light doesn't really mean we have to go back to the drawling board on everything we know about astrophysics. In fact in order to have our universe at it's current state the big bang needed to expand faster than the speed of light.
i have no idea why you would say the galileo spacecraft is still orbiting jupiter when it is not. the news on europa was analysis from old data. On September 21, 2003, after 14 years in space and 8 years of service in the Jovian system, Galileo's mission was terminated by sending the orbiter into Jupiter's atmosphere at a speed of nearly 50 kilometres per second to avoid any chance of it contaminating local moons with bacteria from Earth. so, what gives?
@bm3racer Yes, Galileo was crashed into Jupiter years ago and what was going through my head when I said it was that it was still flying around after all those years BACK THEN. But it gives the impression that it is up even now, which is incorrect.
I doubt that it will come to it, since there is still probably some systematic problem with the OPERA experiment. But more likely than the neutrino's traveling faster than c would be the possibility of them taking a shortcut through one or more of those curled-up extra dimensions of String/M - Theory. I will repeat: Unlikely. But this *could* be a tidbit of evidence for those extra dimensions. Which I, personally, find more interesting than the FTL thing that some people seem so worked up about.
@sbergman27 Ah but if they can prove that they did indeed duck into another dimension, that will prove that the science fiction hyper drive would infact work
@Baronstone Well... you might increase your effective speed by by 10⁻⁵ % or whatever it is... as long as you're made of the right kind of neutrinos. But a whole string of papers, including an early one by Cohen and Glasow, pretty much shift the question from "Could the results be right?" to "What is wrong with the experiment?". There is just too much wrong with the results, even aside from the conflict with GR, for the results to have much of a chance of being valid.
We're told that the elements are forged in stars. Now we're being told that proton beams can actually travel faster than the speed of light, and be converted into nutrinos. If we took the e=mcsquared equasion and plugged it into the quadratic equasion and solved for m what would the XY graft look like? Are scientists using partical excellerators in an attempt to spin/reproduce gold atoms?
What's going on in the tiny screen in the backround? I'M JOKING. This is massive. Two huge announcements, both having the potential to change the course of human history forever. Amazing.
Also, news here in NZ has a story from NASA about a possible "twin" of Earth's. Thoughts? Haven't seen the story yet though.
I was wondering if you could give us an update on the technology for building a space elevator. I heard a lot about it a few years ago, but now their isn't much being said about it. This seems really important because such a technology could reduce costs for space travel significantly.
faster than the speed of light, ha! what about quantum entanglement.. You need a picture for your facebook profile... I like the thought that there is a huge microscope that is 17 miles long. so amazing.
tony, what do you think the scientists did wrong in theexperiment? or if you believe the results are accurate, what kind of shifts will be made in popular theories? how will science adjust to this radical new find?
I got a question, how big of a telescope would you need to actually see with visible light an earth sized planet orbiting around a star that was ten light years away at a resolution of say like 16x16 pixels for the whole planet? I know it's not an easy question but if you answer it you'll be my hero.
Ah yes, it's good to know that liquid water on Europa has pretty much been almost confirmed. We have suspected liquid water there for years, time to send a probe up there.
The picture frame with the moving pictures kept catching my eye. Great news about Europa and now I have to read more about the CERN experiment, why would they use different information being sent. It amazes me how we are looking back in time to when a supernova explodes and then days later catch more information. I wish I had access to these telescopes.
@ourtortsystem Nope. We the evidence that there was water was not a direct observation. It was inferred indirectly from the another direct observation of something else.
@KimiScuderiaFerrari I tried something different this time to try to minimize that camera auto focus that keeps happening throughout the video. I thought if I put it farther away, it would stop.
As you can see, it didn't work so I'll go back to the bookcase next week.
@tdarnell depending on what you use for a camera you can turn autofocus off. as for the people who whine about the CERN results - i think some of them are just afraid of wasting a massive portion of their physics career on being completely wrong.
@schmidtbag I use the camera on the Samsung Galaxy S2 phone. I'm highly impressed with the mics on that thing so I really wanted to use it. Seems like there's always something. When I was using the Flip camera, the sound sucked but the video was ok, now it's the other way around.
I couldn't find a way to turn that off. If anyone knows, please let me know!
@blackacidlizzard No. As I've already commented, the presence of water measurement was inferred from direct observations of something else. One observation was possible by inference from another, direct observation.
"[The Chaos terrains'] existence infers the possibility of.."
The object implies, the subject infers. Yes, the measurement was inferred from an observation, but the existence of the object(s) observed (the chaos terrains) implies the extrapolated measurement.
@blackacidlizzard You have a point about the way I said it, but I really do mean to use infer, not imply. So, I should have re-worded that to say something closer to my initial response to you, "The observation of the chaos terrains, coupled with the 4 step theory provided by JHU, allows astronomers to infer the existence of the liquid water lakes kilometers below the crust"
Or something like that. So your criticism is technically correct, but the fault lies in the way I said it.
@tdarnell - According to dictionary-reference-com, your usage of infer has a long and distinguished pedigree, but language lawyers don't like it to pedants are free to criticize it. In fact your usage makes more sense when you think about the latin origin of the word.
I hope we detect life before I croak (20 years atm). It would fundamentally change the way we'd have to view the universe. If life managed to evolve on two places in the same solar system, then life must be extremely common in the universe.
I'm eager to see how the religious people could possibly handle a discovery of microbial life, let alone intelligent, and still hold what they believe as their fundamental truth.
That's what came to my mind. We know the speed resulting from the earths rotation. We know how fast the earth orbits the sun and how fast the sun orbits the center of our galaxy. We do not know the speed of our galaxy in relation to the center of the universe. We can only speculate.
May be this is the reason for the offset :-)
They should repeat the experiment in different angles. Maybe the results will point to the center of the universe.
Your information on Europa is very interesting.... We've been speculating for some time now that liquid water exist beneath the icy surface (suggesting a heat source hence the moon is still geologically active). We definitely need to examine this celestial body with all due haste. The possibilities of what we might find there is mind blowing. Keep em coming Tony!
You are totally right when it comes to the Faster-than-light experiment. I personally believe it will go away, disappear, that they find a systemic error. But its gotten to the point that other people need to independently do similar experiments.
When it comes to Europa, i believe that there is an underground liquid ocean around the whole body. Thats what i conclude from earlier observations.
Yeah right nasa is going to prioritize a mission to Europa like they did right after they discovered the moon instead they will dedicate billions of dollars & decades of research in searching for water on mars but couldn't spar a few 100 million to send a probe to the moons surface.
Fore example they send a robe to Pluto but in all this time they didn't fined the funding & time to send one on the likeliest body in our solar system to harbor life.
I don't think this proves everything wrong with the theories. Rather it just proves that it's possible to travel faster then the speed of light, which is a really good news! That means that we're not bounded by a cosmic cop telling us to slow down. But I suspect that those neutrinos are really time-travelers, as anything past the speed of light travels backwards in time! So the neutrinos should arrive before they are actually sent! Did anyone measured that? Or even took it into consideration?
I have a feeling they're going to keep trying the faster-than-light experiment until they get same-as-light results. But is that the way to go about it? I say let there be fast light!
Awesome & entertaining. I have a feeling they'll keep trying the faster-than-light experiment until they get same-as-light results. But is that the way to go about it? I say let there be fast light.
Is it possible that Earth's gravity curves spacetime and makes the distance which the neutrinos have to travel shorter/give them more time to travel between the two labs?
Love your work, T, there's certainly no shortage of fascinating discoveries these days. We are all very fortunate to be living in that microscopic sliver of our history where we get to witness first hand each layer of our ignorance being peeled away from our understanding of the Universe, as so many of its secrets are being revealed. Thanks.
Right-wingers have been claiming they have found a way to travel faster than light for decades but those pesky Jews always come along and "silence" them.
@PompousPreacher lol no i wasnt drunk--i think i misread your comment--i thought you were saying like 'right wingers have been claiming they found a way to travel faster than the speed of light" But the jews etc...Like YOU were saying the jews silence them--but I think you intended it like the 'right wingers' say that the jews etc..
in a way i hope the experiments results were false because the idea of nothing exceding the spead of light is a fundamental key within various space sciences, yet on the other hand the idea of being able break that speed limit raises so many fascinating questions....
The sci-fi fan in me hopes that FTL can be reached, but I can't imagine it being possible. Hopefully we will see some more compelling proof in the future.
For the "faster than light" experiment, I would suggest the scientists research the "pulse coding" procedures used by the United States Navy's Mk-92 Mod 6 System. Each RADAR signal that is emitted is coded, so that input signals returning to the RADAR system can be matched to the original output singal. This is used to increase the efective range by increasing the "listening time" by receiving multiple signals at the input. Perhaps this can be used to differentiate the signals observed.
@tdarnell Do you know if they used a modified/different technique to measure the time it took for the neutrinos to travel? It seemed likely to me that that was the problem in the first experiment, a lot of room for error there.
Why do you only have 2 pictures in your photoframe?
SjaanK85 1 month ago
I don't know if that's you're implying, but Europa itself isn't geologically active, Europa's interior is heated from tidal friction from Jupiter and the outer moons, which is why NASA believes that Europa contains liquid water in its interior. If it was geologically active itself, it isn't likely that the surface of the planet would be frozen. NASA also suspects that one of Saturn's moons is also undergoing this effect. The moon shoots geysers into Saturn's ring system.
midnightraven00 1 month ago
You know Something going faster than the speed of light doesn't really mean we have to go back to the drawling board on everything we know about astrophysics. In fact in order to have our universe at it's current state the big bang needed to expand faster than the speed of light.
MrAwesomesauce101 2 months ago in playlist More videos from tdarnell
@tdarnell pls read my last msg about a potential factual error re ur comments on galilleo the nasa mission.
bm3racer 2 months ago
i have no idea why you would say the galileo spacecraft is still orbiting jupiter when it is not. the news on europa was analysis from old data. On September 21, 2003, after 14 years in space and 8 years of service in the Jovian system, Galileo's mission was terminated by sending the orbiter into Jupiter's atmosphere at a speed of nearly 50 kilometres per second to avoid any chance of it contaminating local moons with bacteria from Earth. so, what gives?
bm3racer 2 months ago
@bm3racer Yes, Galileo was crashed into Jupiter years ago and what was going through my head when I said it was that it was still flying around after all those years BACK THEN. But it gives the impression that it is up even now, which is incorrect.
tdarnell 2 months ago
I doubt that it will come to it, since there is still probably some systematic problem with the OPERA experiment. But more likely than the neutrino's traveling faster than c would be the possibility of them taking a shortcut through one or more of those curled-up extra dimensions of String/M - Theory. I will repeat: Unlikely. But this *could* be a tidbit of evidence for those extra dimensions. Which I, personally, find more interesting than the FTL thing that some people seem so worked up about.
sbergman27 2 months ago
@sbergman27 Ah but if they can prove that they did indeed duck into another dimension, that will prove that the science fiction hyper drive would infact work
Baronstone 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@Baronstone Well... you might increase your effective speed by by 10⁻⁵ % or whatever it is... as long as you're made of the right kind of neutrinos. But a whole string of papers, including an early one by Cohen and Glasow, pretty much shift the question from "Could the results be right?" to "What is wrong with the experiment?". There is just too much wrong with the results, even aside from the conflict with GR, for the results to have much of a chance of being valid.
sbergman27 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We're told that the elements are forged in stars. Now we're being told that proton beams can actually travel faster than the speed of light, and be converted into nutrinos. If we took the e=mcsquared equasion and plugged it into the quadratic equasion and solved for m what would the XY graft look like? Are scientists using partical excellerators in an attempt to spin/reproduce gold atoms?
freddyeddyr 2 months ago
Comment removed
freddyeddyr 2 months ago
thanks for taking the time to put this in simple words
eruseron 2 months ago
please clear up your sound somehow :)
otherwise great
HCLivess 2 months ago
Amazing work my friend
zacharylansing 2 months ago
I love to listen to your videos.
HennZu 2 months ago
Thank you Tony for doing a great job!
HennZu 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CERN For The Lose experiment?
TheDivineWinds 2 months ago
Comment removed
TheDivineWinds 2 months ago
Very helpful stuff - keep it coming please. Thanks very much from the UK
TheHunnyhillbees 2 months ago
Dude! I have those exact same globe-bookends! They used to belong to my grandfather which makes them hella old. Where did you get yours?
iTzNoxy 2 months ago
love this channel
FIGHTFANNERD3 2 months ago
Read 2061: Odyssey Three. There is life on Europa.
blazak 2 months ago
Kepler 22b.
Barnicalsify 2 months ago
What's going on in the tiny screen in the backround? I'M JOKING. This is massive. Two huge announcements, both having the potential to change the course of human history forever. Amazing.
Also, news here in NZ has a story from NASA about a possible "twin" of Earth's. Thoughts? Haven't seen the story yet though.
Barnicalsify 2 months ago
Could this guy have found the solution for the neutrino speed problem?
google "1110.2685v4 arxiv.org" it is the second link.
He finds almost exactly the right time discrepancy.
Battery9876 3 months ago
fantastic stuff...again
LemmingdeMerciless 3 months ago
Well it seems Einstein may have screwed up:)
primetubervideos 3 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Love the information
WILDLEGHORN 3 months ago
I was wondering if you could give us an update on the technology for building a space elevator. I heard a lot about it a few years ago, but now their isn't much being said about it. This seems really important because such a technology could reduce costs for space travel significantly.
FlowCell 3 months ago
Love the information
stingingtruth 3 months ago
haha 4:28 cracked me up up up up!
vibol03 3 months ago
Dude you are awesome, love all the updates and info.
sk8guitardrums 3 months ago
I appreciate the science, but must admit I've gotten to where I always wait for those few outtakes at the end! ;-)
Keep up the great work!
logeness 3 months ago
I love your bloopers
cvgeeps 3 months ago
Nice new background
ricois3 3 months ago
faster than the speed of light, ha! what about quantum entanglement.. You need a picture for your facebook profile... I like the thought that there is a huge microscope that is 17 miles long. so amazing.
dillinger9999 3 months ago
I like the tought that we have a proton cannon based in switzerland :)
Ulti2k 3 months ago
Tony pls, update link to video on FB first... might have missed this video otherwise!
GShock112 3 months ago
tony, what do you think the scientists did wrong in theexperiment? or if you believe the results are accurate, what kind of shifts will be made in popular theories? how will science adjust to this radical new find?
sorry8140 3 months ago
I got a question, how big of a telescope would you need to actually see with visible light an earth sized planet orbiting around a star that was ten light years away at a resolution of say like 16x16 pixels for the whole planet? I know it's not an easy question but if you answer it you'll be my hero.
ArchNME 3 months ago
ohh and FYI - in your honor - I play the game Startrek Online..and named one of my Starships USS Tdarnell
rextrek 3 months ago 2
i think it is time to set up a " we broke the light barrier Party" so it is ready should the result be confirmed
FattyMcFox 3 months ago
thank u for your informative videos......in a world with constant stupidity this is refreshing
rextrek 3 months ago
Ah yes, it's good to know that liquid water on Europa has pretty much been almost confirmed. We have suspected liquid water there for years, time to send a probe up there.
hbk6211 3 months ago
The picture frame with the moving pictures kept catching my eye. Great news about Europa and now I have to read more about the CERN experiment, why would they use different information being sent. It amazes me how we are looking back in time to when a supernova explodes and then days later catch more information. I wish I had access to these telescopes.
Big sigh.
TrillianAlice 3 months ago
I'm not an expert on this whole neutrino thing, but I would assume they aren't taking all of the factors into consideration.
astrobc1 3 months ago
@2:45
imply-infer fail :)))))
ourtortsystem 3 months ago
@ourtortsystem Nope. We the evidence that there was water was not a direct observation. It was inferred indirectly from the another direct observation of something else.
So, inferred is the correct word.
tdarnell 3 months ago
An informative and fascinating video as per usual. Thankyou
newcilad 3 months ago
Definitely keep the bloopers!
ProjectTrapdoor 3 months ago 7
Unlike what tk0145 says, keep the bloopers.
StargateTravel 3 months ago
Cut the bloopers!
tk0145 3 months ago
Always look forward to these posts. Question: What keeps these 'lakes' from freezing if they are surrounded by ice?
sidoney101 3 months ago
@sidoney101 the heat from the core.
SaristasX 3 months ago
i like that sweater
jamminjago 3 months ago
The book case.... its gone! where have you put the book case? and the duck?!?!
CyberNeticRodent 3 months ago
BIG NEWS.
magmaguy 3 months ago
Ultimate Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, The Universe, and Everything is in #42 :P
And he's talking about particles moving faster then light ... not coincidence no it's not ;)
tbyte 3 months ago
what if they would send it backwards from itally to switserland => would there be a delay ? :-)
jetunknownactor 3 months ago
I miss the books and this video was a bit short :'(
KimiScuderiaFerrari 3 months ago
@KimiScuderiaFerrari I tried something different this time to try to minimize that camera auto focus that keeps happening throughout the video. I thought if I put it farther away, it would stop.
As you can see, it didn't work so I'll go back to the bookcase next week.
tdarnell 3 months ago
@tdarnell depending on what you use for a camera you can turn autofocus off. as for the people who whine about the CERN results - i think some of them are just afraid of wasting a massive portion of their physics career on being completely wrong.
schmidtbag 3 months ago
@schmidtbag I use the camera on the Samsung Galaxy S2 phone. I'm highly impressed with the mics on that thing so I really wanted to use it. Seems like there's always something. When I was using the Flip camera, the sound sucked but the video was ok, now it's the other way around.
I couldn't find a way to turn that off. If anyone knows, please let me know!
tdarnell 3 months ago
E ≠ mc²
hehehe!
scramblethink 3 months ago
nice Freddy vKruger sweater td
timejiff 3 months ago
Where are the books!?!!
SuperLaugh20 3 months ago
@SuperLaugh20 Next time it'll be back
tdarnell 3 months ago
2:50
IMPLIES, damnit. IMPLIES!
blackacidlizzard 3 months ago
@blackacidlizzard No. As I've already commented, the presence of water measurement was inferred from direct observations of something else. One observation was possible by inference from another, direct observation.
tdarnell 3 months ago 4
@tdarnell
I re-listened, and I'm pretty sure about this.
"[The Chaos terrains'] existence infers the possibility of.."
The object implies, the subject infers. Yes, the measurement was inferred from an observation, but the existence of the object(s) observed (the chaos terrains) implies the extrapolated measurement.
Am I wrong?
blackacidlizzard 3 months ago
@blackacidlizzard You have a point about the way I said it, but I really do mean to use infer, not imply. So, I should have re-worded that to say something closer to my initial response to you, "The observation of the chaos terrains, coupled with the 4 step theory provided by JHU, allows astronomers to infer the existence of the liquid water lakes kilometers below the crust"
Or something like that. So your criticism is technically correct, but the fault lies in the way I said it.
tdarnell 3 months ago 9
@tdarnell
Right on :)
blackacidlizzard 3 months ago
@tdarnell - According to dictionary-reference-com, your usage of infer has a long and distinguished pedigree, but language lawyers don't like it to pedants are free to criticize it. In fact your usage makes more sense when you think about the latin origin of the word.
njimko23 3 months ago
I hope we detect life before I croak (20 years atm). It would fundamentally change the way we'd have to view the universe. If life managed to evolve on two places in the same solar system, then life must be extremely common in the universe.
I'm eager to see how the religious people could possibly handle a discovery of microbial life, let alone intelligent, and still hold what they believe as their fundamental truth.
maggru91 3 months ago
I've never been wholly convinced that the speed of light is an actual limit.
sappha58 3 months ago 2
@sappha58 Me too, I think we still don't know sh*t about these things. :D But we are trying...
KimiScuderiaFerrari 3 months ago
Did they take account of the earths speed?
That's what came to my mind. We know the speed resulting from the earths rotation. We know how fast the earth orbits the sun and how fast the sun orbits the center of our galaxy. We do not know the speed of our galaxy in relation to the center of the universe. We can only speculate.
May be this is the reason for the offset :-)
They should repeat the experiment in different angles. Maybe the results will point to the center of the universe.
M0rdH0rst 3 months ago
@M0rdH0rst Or repeat the experiment every 6 hours. That would mean at least orthogonal measurements in one plane.
M0rdH0rst 3 months ago
Here i Denmark it is saturday morning when your videos arrive.
What an inspiring beginning to the week-end! :))
Spiresprog 3 months ago 42
@Spiresprog Germany agrees. :D
LVskywalker 3 months ago
@Spiresprog
Same thing in England :-)
abjectreality 3 months ago
@Spiresprog And with a hangover is it just great :P
Nejicool14 3 months ago
@Spiresprog Andre danske rumfans :)
Jonassoe 3 months ago
Your information on Europa is very interesting.... We've been speculating for some time now that liquid water exist beneath the icy surface (suggesting a heat source hence the moon is still geologically active). We definitely need to examine this celestial body with all due haste. The possibilities of what we might find there is mind blowing. Keep em coming Tony!
david25luvit 3 months ago
I want me a nutrinocarr.. with wings, and I shall rule the universe. Thanks for the heads up Darnell.
inka9 3 months ago
You used the article I sent you about the CERN Experiment! Huzzah!!
lukenuetzmann 3 months ago 4
@lukenuetzmann That's right. You sent that to me right after I posted #41 I believe.
tdarnell 3 months ago
You are totally right when it comes to the Faster-than-light experiment. I personally believe it will go away, disappear, that they find a systemic error. But its gotten to the point that other people need to independently do similar experiments.
When it comes to Europa, i believe that there is an underground liquid ocean around the whole body. Thats what i conclude from earlier observations.
kurtilein3 3 months ago
Once again you've made me late for work :-)
XXXPopeBenedictXVI 3 months ago
hello space fans i'm a dufus.
Richardemize 3 months ago
Neutrino: "pffff screw relativity!"
SEThatered 3 months ago 2
haha.. I always knew that light speed barrier can be broken..
That's how a blackhole works.. The core of the star spins faster than light after the star goes supernova and a blackhole creates.
rjdaredevil 3 months ago
Comment removed
WatchmenDrManhattan 3 months ago
Yeah right nasa is going to prioritize a mission to Europa like they did right after they discovered the moon instead they will dedicate billions of dollars & decades of research in searching for water on mars but couldn't spar a few 100 million to send a probe to the moons surface.
Fore example they send a robe to Pluto but in all this time they didn't fined the funding & time to send one on the likeliest body in our solar system to harbor life.
WatchmenDrManhattan 3 months ago
warp speed full ahead!!!!
etcjrwpolo1087 3 months ago
Faster than light?..
smartzazi 3 months ago
@smartzazi Yeah.. that's what I was thinking. I actually backtracked in the video to see if I heard that right, lol.
Cheese71 3 months ago
I don't think this proves everything wrong with the theories. Rather it just proves that it's possible to travel faster then the speed of light, which is a really good news! That means that we're not bounded by a cosmic cop telling us to slow down. But I suspect that those neutrinos are really time-travelers, as anything past the speed of light travels backwards in time! So the neutrinos should arrive before they are actually sent! Did anyone measured that? Or even took it into consideration?
danielbluesmoke 3 months ago
Keep looking up? But doesn't just about everybody look at monitors horizontally these days?
farvision 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have a feeling they're going to keep trying the faster-than-light experiment until they get same-as-light results. But is that the way to go about it? I say let there be fast light!
timfast4 3 months ago
when I see a tdarnell upload, it makes my day!
mio68df 3 months ago
Quantum Tunneling. Explanation, done.
SelenianDawn 3 months ago
Awesome & entertaining. I have a feeling they'll keep trying the faster-than-light experiment until they get same-as-light results. But is that the way to go about it? I say let there be fast light.
timfast4 3 months ago
That would be pretty exciting to find out if there was water that far away from us!
CRXspeedshift 3 months ago
Maybe its oil not water on Jupiter
interfan63 3 months ago
I am very disturbed. There is just no way Einstein was wrong. If these results are not disproved soon I am going to cry.
NewModelPartisan 3 months ago
Dude you're crazy and it's awesome.
I hope the neutrino tests hold up. Although relativity is an amazing theory and is very useful, It is also probably the most annoying.
Amazing new things happen every day!
pyrea17 3 months ago
OOOOOMMMMGGGG ive been waiting all day. i love these videos!!!!
M0BeTTAb0y 3 months ago
Is it possible that Earth's gravity curves spacetime and makes the distance which the neutrinos have to travel shorter/give them more time to travel between the two labs?
Jonassoe 3 months ago
Love your work, T, there's certainly no shortage of fascinating discoveries these days. We are all very fortunate to be living in that microscopic sliver of our history where we get to witness first hand each layer of our ignorance being peeled away from our understanding of the Universe, as so many of its secrets are being revealed. Thanks.
Walshyman 3 months ago
Chaos Terreigns
dietsnapple89 3 months ago
Right-wingers have been claiming they have found a way to travel faster than light for decades but those pesky Jews always come along and "silence" them.
PompousPreacher 3 months ago
@PompousPreacher will you go lecture flocks on the anti christ or some rapture non-sense and leave the important things to the rational ppl please
pawndominance1 3 months ago
Comment removed
PompousPreacher 3 months ago
@PompousPreacher lol no i wasnt drunk--i think i misread your comment--i thought you were saying like 'right wingers have been claiming they found a way to travel faster than the speed of light" But the jews etc...Like YOU were saying the jews silence them--but I think you intended it like the 'right wingers' say that the jews etc..
pawndominance1 3 months ago
in a way i hope the experiments results were false because the idea of nothing exceding the spead of light is a fundamental key within various space sciences, yet on the other hand the idea of being able break that speed limit raises so many fascinating questions....
Emlieexx 3 months ago
So I WILL have a car that goes faster than light one day after all?
chris3443 3 months ago
@chris3443 lol u wish
JackyRBKwan 3 months ago
So E=mc2 would change if the neutrinos does travel faster???
sarkerm2 3 months ago
Very interesting, thanks for the update.
Kariakas 3 months ago
"Keep looking up." Great close! :)
ChessNetwork 3 months ago
@ChessNetwork he ends it with that in every video.
JackyRBKwan 3 months ago
@JackyRBKwan It's so appropriate. :)
ChessNetwork 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
...finally I can turn my communicator on
~ without having the tech stasis wining and fining
=and trying to block my signal
docatomics 3 months ago
Comment removed
docatomics 3 months ago
The sci-fi fan in me hopes that FTL can be reached, but I can't imagine it being possible. Hopefully we will see some more compelling proof in the future.
240Gromit 3 months ago
For the "faster than light" experiment, I would suggest the scientists research the "pulse coding" procedures used by the United States Navy's Mk-92 Mod 6 System. Each RADAR signal that is emitted is coded, so that input signals returning to the RADAR system can be matched to the original output singal. This is used to increase the efective range by increasing the "listening time" by receiving multiple signals at the input. Perhaps this can be used to differentiate the signals observed.
Odashiman 3 months ago
@tdarnell Do you know if they used a modified/different technique to measure the time it took for the neutrinos to travel? It seemed likely to me that that was the problem in the first experiment, a lot of room for error there.
IamBread18 3 months ago
a whole 6km/sec faster than the 300,000km/sec of speed of light. rofl
must be some super mega measurement
lucabaracuda987 3 months ago
@lucabaracuda987 some super mega intellect you have. rofl.
idealdistribution 3 months ago
Yay new vid :D
IamBread18 3 months ago
Nice sweater
tsjoencinema 3 months ago