Creation: Science Confirms the Bible is True Part 1-1

[co2isgoodal]

"14 In them is fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah: “‘You will be ever hearing but never understanding; you will be ever seeing but never perceiving.

15 For this people’s heart has become calloused; they hardly hear with their ears, and they have closed their eyes. "

MATTHEW 13;14 7 15

Romans 1:28

And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind

[finderfinder100]

the vagueness of "kinds".

[lizchristshome1]

Usually a scientist starts with a premise or guess, and then looks for evidence and answers. If he is honest, he doesn't tweak the findings to match the premise/guess that he began with.

In the last 50 years or more, many archeological finds have verified the historical info in the Bible. There is no reason to discount that perhaps the origins and development of biological life could not also be true because it is stated so in the Bible. Evolutionists start by guessing a premise tool

[Bowkowsowman]

Argument loses all credibility in the first 30 seconds: "We don't question the bible, because the bible says it is the ultimate authority."

[natelovesjessi]

@Bowkowsowman

Not exactly. He's just presupposing the Bible is true, then researching evidence. Science can't be an authority because science is always changing, so assuming the documents you're testing are true, then trying to falsify them is a better way to test them. He's going on both sides of that coin. Using scientific evidence that confirms the Bible, and discussing and falsifying many said counter-examples.

Same way any historical document is tested.

[Bowkowsowman]

@natelovesjessi And why can't changing things be authoritative?

What is this "Scientific evidence that confirms the bible"? Confirms what, exactly?

[natelovesjessi]

@Bowkowsowman

Basically, science can't prove anything. Science is just observing evidence and drawing reasonable conclusions. Often times, especially in historical cases, there can be more than one reasonable conclusion, sometimes because of previous bias (not the same as scientific prejudice, bias is a good thing), other times just straight from the facts. This video is just a little presentation of Dr. Lisle's research, making connections from defined evidence to a reasonable conclusion.