S70 BATTLEHAWK1

[explosivecattle]

ill trade you my snack pack for it

[Shadowsolider1]

will never beet the Mi-24

[broLAXgoalie12]

@Shadowsolider1 ya...it will, it has guided missiles versus rockets for the Hind. It could hit the hind before it was even spotted on enemy radar.

[sscaero15]

@broLAXgoalie12 Hind does not have rockets,it has missiles and that to guided.these two things are completely different.

[Shadowsolider1]

@sscaero15 the hind is a utility helicopter like the black hawk or a battle hawk

[Shadowsolider1]

@broLAXgoalie12 wow u must be retarded -_- the payload for the hind is massive it can carry long range air to air missiles (175km's or something like tht the su-27's are armed with them) it doesn't use rockets but sophisticated laser and infer-read missiles including air to air missiles a fair bit bigger than a stupid stinger. The black Hawk also has major flaws so yeah. BAMM

[broLAXgoalie12]

@Shadowsolider1 and the hind doesn't have flaws? Don't turn to fast or you might be missing a tail rotor. Oh, exhaust heat masking? We don't need that!

[DragoNru]

nice commercial, I gona buy one

[marcsman07]

:D sooo fucking cool.

[Shadowsolider1]

@marcsman07 it's just a black hawk but more weaponised it has everything a black hawk does

[WargasmPegasus]

Apache and Blackhawk had sex = Battlehawk

[TheFisherman290]

Cool concept, it'll never get funded though. Leave the shooting to the gun pilots.

[milkwetcookies]

It's cool and all but why would i buy it when I can sen in an apache without needing to spend time modifying it?

[joseluisnewyork]

No thanks, I preffer the russian HIND is much better in all ways.

[lapinschous1]

Nexter turrret? So the US army uses french equipment?

[Fly2Azeroth]

@lapinschous1 yes if it dose the job

[mgibbs88]

@lapinschous1 I think this is just an ad for Sikorsky. I don't think the US Army uses the Battlehawk.

[broLAXgoalie12]

@mgibbs88 it is still a concept, it has not gone into production (according to sikorsky)

[lapinschous1]

This is what they used to kill Bin Laden

[timb37]

@lapinschous1 they used a rolled up american flag to kill Obama, wait, I mean Bin Laden

[lapinschous1]

@timb37 racist

[timb37]

@lapinschous1 I hope you're kidding, cause I was. Lighten up

[lapinschous1]

@timb37 of course i was...

[SkullKing11841]

@lapinschous1 They used stealth modified black hawks, the battle hawk with all it's weapons would be un-stealthy.

[NvidiATI]

Hind-style

[paymanmktr]

I dont think BATTLEHAWK1 become success,they put some weapons on transport helicopter now because of this he cant transport many troops and its some thing between battle and transport helicopter and the price is so high that not many nation can afford this luxurey helicopter

[Baseshocks]

@paymanmktr the point of this is to have the option too. it can ether be a transport aircraft or a attack aircraft. for example say its in Afghanistan, its used as a transport heilo but for a operation their will be very few assets for air support so they take a black hawk and add the kit to make it a ground support chopper.

[quickzilver333]

@paymanmktr Where have you been in the past decades when they use Hueys as transport and attack helicopter?

[oStirFryo]

@quickzilver333 but they werent a gigantic as the the blackhawk.. i wana see a skycrane turned gunship. that would be sick

[TheSamaell]

russian KA-50(2) operators are laughing :)) look it up

[flamezealous]

@TheSamaell... Come on! By European standards, Russian systems become antiques within 2-3 three years of when they are deployed!!

[TheSamaell]

@flamezealous all military systems become inferior after 5 years ( lets not get carried away ) they become inferior by the newer models ... it doesnt necessarily have to be a new platform , tiny adjustments and improvements to the avionics , weight and engine can mean a huge difference between different models 1 or 2 years apart ... there are two things russian military is famous for ... lasting ( in all aspects) and keeping quiet ( they dont brag like the US ) card up the sleeve ;)

[flamezealous]

@TheSamaell Then why are Russian made aircraft so prone to air disasters?!!? Avionics you say, that's where the West beats you round n square! US air planes/machines are better made! Russian stuff is roughly made, even crude!

[TheSamaell]

@flamezealous in that aspect they are more durable ... both have the good and the bad in them ... for ex ive seen hornets that dont clock because something in the "big computer" was sleeping and russian migs that just fell apart in the air ... it comes to maintenance

[flamezealous]

@TheSamaell... Sober replies; you seem dependable, you could sell me anything! Are you a pilot? Or are you one of those people that provide stuff and texts for encyclopedias?!?

[TheSamaell]

@flamezealous uncle pilot , im very interested in military equipment and tactics and i have done some studies at my faculty regarding soldier , pilot , navigator psychology ( armed forces psychology for short ) i dont want to seem pushy or rude but propaganda isnt really performance , i dont doubt that american forces have good platforms and tactics but they are not the only ones

[flamezealous]

@TheSamaell... Of course I was "pulling your leg" from the beginning! No one can doubt the quality of Russian aviation, or technology for that matter, which are superb; Russia's education system too is, I believe, superior to what the West has-- I mean, to me people who have gone through that system are more vast in their knowledge of the world around us. But we are very afraid of your politics, which inspires many despots in less developed countries to cling to power in the name of Leninism!

[TheSamaell]

@flamezealous im not russian :)) im romanian ... we where under the russian power dome for a long period but our late dictator Ceausescu (we executed him in 89 ) did one good thing , get us away from russian power ... we still have russian equipment tho now slowly replaced with american and german thats why i know a little how to compare them , romanian forces helped in irak , afganistan etc with akm*s and russian heavy units and did just fine with both american and russian armament

[flamezealous]

@TheSamaell... Myself I have known nothing but dictators and bad governance, and the funny thing is all have been supported by both the West and the East, the most notorious supporters of our current regime are China and North Korea; supplying our armed forces wit arms, training our special forces 2. Our "big man" has been supplied wit Migs from Putin's Russia; hurting our all ready lousy economy!! He is just like Qadaffi, his sons and tribe!

[TheSamaell]

@flamezealous the army today faces just one big question " have i a cause to fight for ... money is not enough to rick life and limb for " and politics and economical schemes and media manipulation made us suspicious of all ... even ourselves " divide an conquer " say the big strategist and its working for the most part ... the future from where we stand looks very grim from the military point of view because we have the capacity to destroy the planet 9 time over and tensions are rising

[flamezealous]

@TheSamaell...So, if it’s coming to that, the question is, on which side should one fight in the coming wars of humanities mutual destruction? One thing is for sure, myself I will not be a pacifist during that time! Nor will I be in my president’s armed forces!!

[TheSamaell]

@flamezealous only stupid people would, the nation i would fight for would be the one where my loved ones would be in danger, and this thing shows how hazy the notion of "cause of war is " every soldier fights for the same thing, his loved ones, every general makes them fight for money , power and himself and still the war wages, once a soldier realizes that he shoots a mirror he becomes useless, this is the notion that training erases from his mind...

[TheSamaell]

@flamezealous i would have loved to become a pilot but sadly i was born with a defect in my right eye , corrected with surgery but i dont have 20 20 vision to become a pilot so im going in the army as a psychologist

[TheSamaell]

still look up the KA-50 compare it and lets assume that its maintained ( russians tend to let them fall apart of fix them with duck-tape thats why they seem ancient after only a few years ... americans and most europeans rebuild the platforms every 3 years , some russian platforms still have the same engine oil from when they came out of the factory )

[flamezealous]

Well, the Americans are business men, superb advertising is their game!

[blackhawk438]

so its an mi24

[marg0330]

the colombian airforce modified a standard uh-60 and installed weapons systems as well, look up "arpia iii"

[oded999191]

THIS IS AN ISRAELI HELICOPTER.YOU CAN SEE THE YELOW "V" IN THE BACK

[mrmakemakkara]

SHALOM VERY NICE VIDEO THANKS !!!!!!

[david204204]

2:07 - 3:04 is israeli 124 chopper

[Wardog687]

It sounds like that undercannon and rotation system was probably incorporated from the AH-64. The Guided Missles sound like thier state of the art. Now the only question being if this is a modification/upgrade. Has it already seen service in Afghanistan?. And what is the likelyhood of sucess in Foriegn Military Sales>

And id what do the trials and field trial results?

[sufa256]

Great!!!

[105thch]

"Hello" from MI24/MI17.

[wailingwarfare]

shit helo

[MasterDiablo]

Russian already did this 50 years ago.

[marek092]

@MasterDiablo right, but Mi-24/35 have more advantages - looks better =)

[Stretedge]

@MasterDiablo don't flatter yourself, we all know russian fire control systems, even the modern ones, couldn't hit the wide side of a carrier from point blank. The systems seen on this and other American choppers are perfectly engineered, deadly accurate, and reliable. find me a Mil 24 that can blast a tank from 8000 meters every shot,

[darkon112]

@Stretedge You base this on what exactly ? And the Mi-35 says hi.

[Stretedge]

@darkon112 do some research igor, look up how in twelve tests of russias Bulava fleet ballistic missile, 7 times it catastrophically failed. Also take note that all of russias helos and planes are made by Mil and Mig, those are government run money pits which have constantly rejected fresh ideas and technological advances. russia cant even keep track of their own satellites in space, and i'm supposed to give props to the Mil 35? nice try.

[darkon112]

@Stretedge What do Bulava issues have to do with fire control systems ..or that stupid rant of yours about Migs and Mil's ? Bulava issue has been solved and it's not like US ever had problems with their ballistic missiles. FYI Sukhoi is the main plain maker this days( and has been for a long while now.) and mil isn't the only one who's making heli's ...there is a bureau called kamov you know.

[luisaviation]

awesome, looks like a joint venture between Sikorsky and rafael maybe a cheaper versions than the apache

[IsraeliXdude]

@luisaviation And Elbit ATK NEXTER Honeywell ALKAN