Added: 4 years ago
From: GlendaGreen
Views: 2,910
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (9)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Neat vid!

    I am an artist trying to promote my theory on the dynamics of light and time.

    This theory is based on two postulates

    1. Is that the quantum wave particle function Ψ represents the forward passage of time ∆E ∆t ≥ h/2π itself

    2. Is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆p×≥h/4π that is formed by the w- function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event.

    This process of continuous change we see and feel as the flow of time itself!

  • Quantum mechanics are an interest so we seem to be coming at this from different angles which is fine. Keeping an open mind and evaluating the totality of what is being presented is in essence what I would call the modern quantum model.

  • Indeed, a model would be an appropriate way of putting it. I can not however agree that quantum mechanics should be disregarded which it appears Glenda was suggesting, I will have to check out that book you suggested earlier to make sure, but for now she is not on my good list.

  • regardless of the videos context, she took Albert Einstein quotes out of context, and called Niels Bohr the king of quantum mechanics, mind you yes he was quite important, but dwarfed by work of modern physicists. To say the quantum theory should be rethought is ridiculous, we do not understand it, it is being rethought every day, we know it exists else our solar system would have collapsed long ago, and we would not have interference patterns. You may want to take a look @ quantum mechanics!!

  • Wow, you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about!!! Albert Einstein made those comments in frustration because of the complexity of the problem. The fact that you gave that man and his vacuum question any credit at all is the simplest way to prove your ignorance, go take a paper bag and put it in a vacuum chamber, I dare you. I bet you a trillion dollars it does not blow up and paint me Starry Night!!!!

  • From a casual study of string theory and M theory, I feel hesitant to believe anything other than structural models of the gross universe are absolutely known and conclusive. Inside of those gross forms, a vacuum probably does not and cannot exist. But who is to say that there is only one dimension to reality and that the gross forms we call the universe are the complete explanation of the multiverse and its full potential?

  • In case you are having a hard time picturing... It implodes, becomes as small as possible, tries not to exist, kinda like what happens when something gets sucked into a black hole and all of its "physical DNA" brakes down, at which time quantum theory becomes VERY IMPORTANT. Oh by the way, they did not stick the word theory behind quantum because they wanted to!

  • This video is one of several on such topics... taken out of context you won't have enough information to assess what Glenda is addressing. Another point of reference would be to read her book, Love Without End. There are unique aspects of physics within the book that may open your mind in the pursuit of your interests of study.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more