Added: 3 years ago
From: WarCrime911
Views: 72,254
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (853)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Do not knock NIST. They had a chemistry set from a hobby shop, and a Timex Sinclair 16k computer to work with. I am sure they did a borax bead test or something that came back negative. I understand that they did Gram stain tests on each others skid marks in their shorts in a blind test, is that not enough.And they gave the official Porky Pig," Ablee ablee a that's all folks" so Americans would know it was over and a job well done. All above board. What more could you want?

  • You are so boari

  • man you're wasting your breath. A zombie class has been created. This isn't about one's level of intelligence its about how able someone is to resist their programming, its about individuality. There aren't many individuals anymore, just roving zombies absorbed by a hive mind. I'm scared to death of people today, its only a matter of time before they smell something that's "different" about me.

  • Very nice videos, very informative. I believe it. Be suprised what people do for money, and to save their ass

  • Anyone who says your stupid if you beleive your own government would kill thousands of inosent people, tell them to look up operation Northwoods then see whos stupid.

  • I think New York City was chosen because of it's popularity. What better place to get the entire world's (or at least North America's) attention than one of the most popular spots of the U.S.? Think about it.

    "Hey, now that everyone's looking, let's say it was terrorists and start a war that'll make aging white motherfuckers rich(er)!"

    If I wanted attention, I'd go dance naked in Times Square, not (for instance), Connecticut. Just saying. More people, more eyes.

  • I'm just wondering... who would actually agree to rigging the towers for demolition?

  • @jawsflounderace Sheeple who were paid a fuck-load of money to do as they're told. Think of the military. Soldiers are to NEVER questions orders, nor to ever allow personal judgement to cloud their thinking. Sheeple. They follow by choice, and that's the worst kind of weakling there is.

  • Yes, the Government has pulled all sorts of stunts on its own people. They come to light pretty quick. The CIA guinea pig tests took 10 years and those were conducted on a small, select group of people, not an entire city under the watch of thousands of cameras and witnesses. Sure, there's scientific evidence, but that isn't hard to come by. There just isn't any logic whatsoever to support the 911 conspiracy.

  • @StapleGunMS,

    Not true! It took 40 years for Tuskeegee to come out. All the witnesses to the JFK Assassanation and many of the people with knowledge of it died within 5 years of it happening. Things this large are never admitted to. Cameras and witnesses confirm explosives in the buildings, etc.

    There's plenty of logic and scientific evidence to support a 9/11 conspiracy theory, just think "Problem, Reaction, Solution" and ask why NORAD stood down that day?

  • What this man say is straight facts. I've did the same research & it took me 3 weeks to make sure I completed everything that I asked & that others did. This guy is spot on in this video & the last. Just ask yourself the same questions & see if you come up with logical answers. not stupid ones

  • @Dootey1 "What this man say is straight facts" - Unfortunately, not all of them

    110 floors sliding down 50 steel columns produce microspheres too

    More to the point - where's the alumina?

  • @beachcomber2008 Well if our government says the fire was past 1000 degrees then it would have melted. But the steel is made of a much stronger product. Example: Your stove is made of of 2-3 types of metal. If you leave it on all day none of your stove would melt because the fire is only a certain temp.

  • @Dootey1 You seem confused. Iron melts at 1535 deg C and no-one is saying the fires reached that temperature

    But steel can CREEP under load and fire at 400 deg C and has only half its strength at 600 deg C

    As the tower columns were 15% crippled and there were fires under way for at least an hour without insulation to resist them, it isn't so surprising that the already distorted towers collapsed

    No uninsulated steel structures have ever survived sustained FIRES

    They never have and never will.

  • @Dootey1 Stoves are usually made of cast iron. They are carefully designed so that their highest loading points are air-cooled to less than 400 deg C. Steel stoves are subject to warping and are generally less reliable and more sensitive to abuse

    "steel is made of a much stronger product" - Only at room temperature. Once heated it loses its special (strong) properties and becomes JUST IRON, which is like toffee when it's at 1000 deg C

    Blacksmithing should have been part of your education

  • This was not an "inside job" it was a coordnated attack by KSM and Bin Laden. This fake science is bull shit, the conspiracy theorys lack one thing...FACTS. Not to mention the fact that a conspiracy of this size would need thousands of people to plan. The science in the theories is fake too, get a life and accept the fact that we were attacked by terrorists not our goverment.

  • @Chmmjeezy There are plenty of FACTS that prove the official theory of 911 is utter bullshit. If you want to refute them why don't you bring some evidence instead of just ignorantly screaming BULLSHIT! People like you will accept any old explanation no matter how ludicrous as long as it allows you to say "Well that explains it. So what's on TV...". Some of us require an explanation to make sense and not violate the laws of physics. Others simply have their heads up their own asses.

  • Comment removed

  • @veritasEtjusticia Don't bother responding as this person would rather believe in the simple less complicated version (the government version) rather than look at science as it seems too much for this individual. Many people would rather believe the "official" version of 9/11 because in reality they are afraid. Fear and ignorance is the primary motivation behind it.

  • All. So. True. Well done.

  • I usually don't agree with any conspiracys but this whole incident doesn't add up. Not like you can "believe" everything that the government tells us anyways. One thing i really didn't get was when they dumped his body because they respected his religion. If he "allegedly" killed thousands of people, would you give a damn about his religion? This is opinion based, but if you kill a thousand people, idgaf if your white/black/muslim/baptist, your a bad person.

  • what about the plane headed to the white house

  • In both parts of the movie he keeps talking about 'that a fire can't bring a steel skycraper down'. Has he forgotten that there also was a major plane involved?! The structures were definitely fractured.

    Still I want to make clear that I do believe this conspiracy theory, but the argument on the steel structure isn't solide, but there are still plenty of facts!

    Interested in more?

    Compare the murders on president Abraham Lincoln and president John F. Kennedy!

  • @bramvanbreda91 reality check. the building is made of very strong steel. a commecial airliner is made of aluminium. yes a plane would do some damage. did any part of the plane make it the entire way through the building? why is that you think? the tops of the buildings should have fallen off at the most.

    comparing this to Lincoln or JFK shows a lack of understanding. please read before you prove beyond doubt you are a fool.

  • @deathrite01

    I wasn't comparing this to the Lincoln vs JFK thing.

    I was just suggesting some interesting conspiracy theories that somebody might want to check out!

    Further this has nothing to do with 9/11 and I never said it did, so...

  • I think it was definitely possible for there to be bombs planted in the core-structures of the towers. BUT I still don't think they could do it so secretly and I don't think the government is behind this. Why would they kill people and destroy buildings of their own country?

  • @ZzDOMINATIONzZ easily. here is an empire facing bankruptcy and demise. desperate times call for desperate action. they needed an excuse to go and rob ill-prepared countries around the world of their resources and wealth. easy and simple. this is capitalism at its finest. the best way to manipulate a game of monopoly is to rig it. america is in heavy debt all over the world. the way the monetary system works forces drastic actions like 911. they needed to pay their bills, thats all. the end

  • Im not big on conspiracys but some things dont add up

  • In the 50 years it will take for the rest of "Americans" to realize what happened, we will finally be able to all admit it and laugh about it. Sad isn't it?

    /watch?v=11Fl9ZVJ7B8

  • A perfect test , Have another tower built ,or find one of the same design ,lets not get crazy here guys just follow me on this , ,,and fly another plane ,same kind into it and see what happens, there are thousands of things that could make this kind of test not work ,but the idea is there . I don't buy into very many things, but living in Colorado before and after 9/11 if any plane or thing flew lower than it should be ,, its on the tv, radio and papers before there ever is a question of WHY.

  • he keeps refering to "steel structures have never collasped due to fire" in all of his haste to get this crap out of his mouth has he mentioned 2 of the towers were devastated by 2 commercial jetliners ? NO ! its just common sense that he should throw that in. now as far as wtc 7 is concerned THATS were he should be focusing his attention. and as far as sparks falling form the tower has anyone thought of it could possible be arching from say a shorted 220 electric cable ? hmmmm..

  • @restlessbreed10 Watch part one.

  • this to me is just a bunch of mumbo jumbo force fed to us by a nervous and jittery commentator. yeah i could come up with the same calculations that this joker did if i had the ways and means that he has. he claims to be a scientist but from where ? the clown college of new york ?

  • @restlessbreed10 yea dude, lets not specifically dispute anything he said and just call it mumbo jumbo. pass me the mcdonalds and koolaid brother.

  • I would like to asks the sceptics ( non-truthers ) if they would support a full and free investigation into 9/11 events ( given that the 9/11 commission report has been compromised by none other that 2 senior members of that commission ) ?

    People are allowed to disagree but we would all benefit from a truly open and subpoena-driven investigation. This would satisfy the families and may help to prevent building collapses in the future if it was determined that explosives were not responsible.

  • Nicely Done !

    Good Job as they say on your side of the pond.

  • There is no way any terrorists in a cave, even ones we created during the afghan war could pass stand down orders as cheney in our gov - and then have cheney make sure the stand down process was followed allowing the plane to hit the pentagon. The same way, the only people who can remove our liberties with the patriot act is our own government. There is no way for terrorists to pass DOD bill and have top ups enforce it.

    Also, I have sources for all this and would be more than happy to share.

  • Furthermore,

    I have the official Cheney 9/11 Stand down orders, that were passed in June 2001. It is public record from the 9/11 hearings that Cheney was informed 3 times while in the bunker of a "plane" on a direct impact course with the Pentagon. It is public record he was informed that the plane was 50 miles away, then 30, then 10. On record cheney was asked if the orders still stood - he said of course have you heard otherwise. The only way shootdown procedures could be broken.

  • 100+ Mainstream Testimonies of Explosives on 911:

    Live Footage of Over 100+ Firefighters, Police Officers, 1st Responders and Mainstream Newscasters reporting Secondary Explosions! It even has the Head of Safety for the NY Fire Department saying “We need to get out. There appears to be secondary explosives planted through out the building. They kept going off and we had to get our men out”

    Mainstream TV footage from 9/11 of everyone talking about the explosives @ watch?v=8n-nT-luFIw

  • DID YOU KNOW? Out of the 6 supposed hijackers, who weren’t found alive in other countries. 4 of them were given their Visas by top US Gov Officials. There is an interview with Michael Springman - 'Chief of Visa Selection at US General Consulate in Jeddah 87-89' who gave the "terrorists" their visas. He admits how they did not meet standard protocol, but the US gov pushed them through anyways to get the terrorists in to the US for air training. His Interview @ watch?v=IvCqIA1a84k (at 6:45)

  • Notice how to uneducated imbecile below me shut his yap when I brought up the fact that a member from the commission report wrote an entire book exposing the official story as based on lies.

    911nside Job,

    Case Closed.

  • 220+ US Intelligence Agents and Counter-Terrorism Veterans Challenge the Official Account of 9/11: "a Cover-up," "a Joke" "Terribly Flawed," "Laced with Contradictions,"

    Gov SOURCES: PatriotsQuestion911.(com)

    Please watch - Zero (A Nobel Prize Winner's 9/11 Documentary) @ watch?v=8XRMrMdn0NQ

    *****

    84% of New Yorker's Say there is a Cover Up and Reject the Official 9/11 Story -

    In 2006 the NY Times and CBS ran an extensive poll with these results @ tiny(DOT)cc/ny911poll

  • Further more Dan Baumbach testiment to what happened inside the building is untrue. Anyone in their right mind did not stay in both those buildings. They were not told to go back to their desks. they were told to evacuate down the stairs in a calm and orderly fashion.  Also who in their right mind would stay in the tower? Not I, maybe you but certainly not I. The people who died that day were above the impact zones and the brave police and fire crews trying to save lives. POS conspiratard

  • Members of the 911 Commission said it was a cover up. They were not allowed to look at a large amount of the evidence, and they had higher ups choosing what evidence they could see or not. Over 220+ US counter terrorism veterans agree that it is a cover up and inside job. PatriotsQuestion911com

    Senator, Max Cleland openly complains about how he was stopped from seeing much of the evidence used to make the official story. He is outraged in the video.

    Source of CNN interview @ watch?v=LWE58Z5evgw

  • @Bi0hazardOpeth LOL what the fuck crack? Members of the 911 comission said it was a cover up? Man you conspiratards are full on with your tin foil hat theories

  • Comment removed

  • @Salsuscanis Hardly a "tin foil hat theory" if it is documented fact hahaha

  • @EvilIntentions01 Documented by who? Oh thats right some credible source. You conspirtards make me laugh

  • @Salsuscanis "The Ground Truth: The Story Behind America’s Defense on 9/11?" was written by the Senior council of the 911 commission report John Farmer, and openly admits that the official version of 9/11 was based on false testimony and documents and is almost entirely untrue. Doesn't really get much more credible than that, an entire book saying 911 was a lie written by a member of the commission report.

    LMAO, why this STILL has to be "debated" I will never know.

  • @EvilIntentions01

    The Farmer book does not make the case for an "inside" job..it does critique intelligence failures and bureaucratic cover-ups..intuitions protecting their turf. Whatever happened that day, you don't strengthen the "inside job" theory by misrepresentation. Counterproductive.

  • @MrArtstacks

    Misrepresentation is a big issue, and can hurt the efficiency of solid hardcore evidence. However, re-read his post. He never said that Farmer said it was an "inside job" - he said farmer explained that it was based on many lies. Which is true. There is much other evidence that clearly proves without a shadow of a doubt US Government complicity. However, farmer admitting to the lies is a first step towards looking at what the significance of those lies means to the events that day

  • @Bi0hazardOpeth

    He clearly implied that is was further proof of an "inside job'. And that is what I find as a big problem with much of the "Truth" movement. So many adherents make apriori assumptions..then interpret the "facts" to match their beliefs. Not to say that some "debunkers" don't do the same damn thing. I simply think that to label anyone who gives credence to the "official story" as being "shills", or 'sheeple", or "paid disinfo agents" is intellectually suspect.

  • @MrArtstacks Anyone who stereotypes or takes a psychic approach of making conclusions based on speculation is intellectually subject. This also goes to the people who just read the official story and debunkers articles without looking at the actual hard evidence of the truth movement. There is a lot of dis-info (the BS no planes distraction for instance) that muddies the water of the hard fact and arguments. Speculation is making a conclusion without looking at both sides of the 'real' evidence.

  • For Instance,

    * Undeniable - 100% Proof of Molten Steel and Explosives. @ watch?v=8YaFGSPErKU

    ^ A straight forward video of NIST discussing this, and the irrefutable evidence of Molten Steel. For instance 2 WTC steel beams completely melted together into a cross.

    Neither fires nor a collapse could create molten steel. Even NIST admitted that the temperatures needed to create molten metal and merge steel together - could not have happened due to the official explanation of the collapse

  • @Bi0hazardOpeth

    Re my previous comment. I am not saying that you are doing that(calling "shills"..etc etc). You seem even-minded and well spoken.

    I simply think a lot of hyperbole, innuendo and really poor reasoning and investigatory practice surrounds 9/11 .....from people on all sides of the issue.

    As with all social problems, it seems that sober reason takes a backseat to louder foolishness.

  • Comment removed

  • @MrArtstacks The book ALSO goes in to detail about how information was restricted and off limits to them and even reveals that "the public had been seriously mislead" and how “at some level of the government, at some point in time…there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened.” Direct quotes from the book. It wasn't just stating the deliberate lack of care by the government, it also goes on to reveal that information was disclosed and off limits.

    Think before you comment.

  • @EvilIntentions01 Calm down...I do think. Quit assuming. My statement stands. I think a big problem, by nearly all that claim to know the "truth" about 9/11(I include "debunkers" and adherents of the official line) is the degree of assumptions they make. That's it..that's all. I have "Truthers" calling me a shill, and "debunkers" calling me a conspiratard.

    Go ahead call me a name too..............

    It's entertaining!

  • @MrArtstacks I wouldn't go around calling people "shills" or "cia agents" because this is no better than going around calling people "conspiratards". I don't believe in no planes or "tv fakery" nor do I even own tinfoil, but I do believe in propaganda, which has been around for hundreds of years now. "How to destroy the 911 truth movement" is a great video and helped me understand how easy fooling a large audience really is. I never call people names though, because name calling is for children.

  • @EvilIntentions01

    Agreed. What did Lincoln say?.."You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.".............

    All our "knowledge" is in essence a leap of faith. Belief in the reality of materiality. Past that, usually an appeal to and trust in "authority". Therein lies the rub..'cause which "authority" is valid?

    That's where propaganda draws it's power.

  • @MrArtstacks Well with Americans, you can fool most of the people, most of the time. But the same principle still applies. Eventually, the masses will realize whats going on and won't be swayed by deluded, and processed fear anymore. I'd estimate about 1/3rd of all Americans now know it was an inside job.

    All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

    ~ Arthur Schopenhauer

    Were at the end of stage 1.

  • @Salsuscanis ok, where are your credible sources? what UNBIASED research have you done? Again, no facts, just

    opinions.

  • @Ignitey24 LOL where are your credible sources? And what unbiased research do you have to present? Again no facts just striaght opinions. Also the amount of thermite you need it tons not pounds. Look at mythbusters and see how much thermite it took to cut through a shitty car not foot thick steel. Moron conspiratards

  • @Salsuscanis

    220+ US Intelligence Agents and Counter-Terrorism Veterans Challenge the Official Account of 9/11: "a Cover-up," "a Joke" "Terribly Flawed," "Laced with Contradictions,"

    Gov SOURCES: PatriotsQuestion911.(com)

    Please watch - Zero (A Nobel Prize Winner's 9/11 Documentary) @ watch?v=8XRMrMdn0NQ

    *****

    84% of New Yorker's Say there is a Cover Up and Reject the Official 9/11 Story -

    In 2006 the NY Times and CBS ran an extensive poll with these results @ tiny(DOT)cc/ny911poll

  • @Bi0hazardOpeth I can come up with the same percent by going to a non liberal function and asking the same question. Also your Zero is a farce. Keep living in the dream world and let the government continue to rule your lives. The government wants you conspirtards out there as distraction to the real issues going on.

  • @Salsuscanis

    What a strong argument you have there. That 220+ CIA, FBI and US Counter Terrorism officials who are openly whistle-blowing the cover up and inside job of 9/11 are just "conspirtards". What a great problem solver you are, you love your country so much - you don't care to do any research into what top CIA and FBI member are saying. I'm sure you supported the Iran Contras too, and told people to ignore CIA, FBI whistle-blowers. Your blind devotion is an principle totalitarian quality

  • @Salsuscanis wow, just like all people who believe the official story, you 1. state no facts to back up your OPINION

    and then two 2. discredit any hard FACTS anyone brings up by labeling them as a nutty conspiracy lunatic. Good job, keep up the good work.

  • LOL they are not spectographically similar. They are completely different

  • Do you really think everyone who disagrees with you isn't using "science?" People get shifted around all the time in office buildings, and office buildings undergo continuous renovation and maintenance. I used to work in several office buildings. When you claim that the buildings collapsed from fire, you forgot to mention that huge planes had crashed into them. If thermite was used, large sections of steel would been found that were cleanly cut in half in the wreckage.

  • @TimothyRaymond1 your correct, large sections of steel would'v been found that where cleanly cut...

    thank god you had AMEC, Bovis Lend Lease, Turner Construction and Tully Construction to cleanup the mess after the "terorist attack" quite fast, 4 privatly owned companies that made it clear no public where allowed on scene or even allowed to see what was going on...

    all good now yea?

    and i'm not even an american.

  • @TimothyRaymond1

    I don't know if it is true but I heard that the towers were designed to withstand a crash from a commercial plane

  • NATGEO SPEWING LIES ABOUT 9/11...

    NATGEO (science vs. conspiracy) "pretended" to investigate 9/11.

    The NATGEO channel presented a show (science vs. conspiracy) that was in the end to cleverly mock and make look foolish (calling them truther's) those who are educated that SIMPLY question the official 9/11 story. The goal is to continue baffle viewers with BS, so they ignore their OWN lying eyes & ears.

    This rebutal video link goes where NATGEO NEVER INTENDED.

    /watch?v=VvXGnbsaRN0

  • your a fucking mastert mind i never would have new this! dude ur awsome idk how u got so smart but it wasnt this fucking country thats for sure u must have lived in like eurpoe or some shit

  • Members of the 911 Commission said it was a cover up. They were not allowed to look at a large amount of the evidence, and they had higher ups choosing what evidence they could see or not. Over 220+ US counter terrorism veterans agree that it is a cover up and inside job. PatriotsQuestion911com

    Senator, Max Cleland openly complains about how he was stopped from seeing much of the evidence used to make the official story. He is outraged in the video.

    Source of CNN interview @ watch?v=LWE58Z5evgw

  • 220+ US Intelligence Agents and Counter-Terrorism Veterans Challenge the Official Account of 9/11: "a Cover-up," "a Joke" "Terribly Flawed," "Laced with Contradictions,"

    Gov SOURCES: PatriotsQuestion911.(com)

    Please watch - Zero (A Nobel Prize Winner's 9/11 Documentary) @ watch?v=ofXKiXNDDYA

    *****

    84% of New Yorker's Say there is a Cover Up and Reject the Official 9/11 Story -

    In 2006 the NY Times and CBS and ran an extensive poll with these results @ tiny(DOT)cc/ny911poll

  • so FUCK you people who are saying this wasent an government cover up

  • has the owner of the video ever seen the video of arron russo? hel even tell u the govenrment was behind 9/11.sense i watched htis video...owner of the video: i suggest u watch the video ID like u to see.

  • i guess the owner of this video thinks the government loves us

    W/E

  • Great video., but do you believe the planes identified by the government flew into the towers? What about the scientific evidence that the planse and the identified pilots could not possibly have performed the maneuvers necessary to make the turns with the g forces and the plane limits?

  • did you know that george bush passed pushed a bill through that indemnifies him and his staff from prosecution of war crimes????????????????????????­?? I WONDER WHY. 

  • Please like this comment so that it stays at the top.

    LAWYERS - IF YOURE WATCHING THIS THEN YOU ALSO BELIEVE THAT YOUR GOVERNMENT IS CROOKED AND VERY EVIL. YOU HAVE THE ABILITY TO CHANGE THINGS (peacefully..) IN YOUR COUNTRY. APPROACH THE UN AND SHOW THEM SOMETHING LIKE THIS.. BUT BETTER.

    change the world.. dont just watch it and nod.

  • thumbs up if u want answers about 9/11 now.

  • Thank you very much man for a detailed informative video thats very interesting and insightful into 9/11

  • i love learning about this stuff, it's just that i cry thinking about it.

  • @ToysNoiz I know what u mean...the thought that this was on purpose just breaks my heart..all those people died because of oil? It's happened in the past,the USA had planned attacks on Cuba,blaming the Cubans..just to start something..Bush and Bin Laden Family? OIL!!!!!!

  • I remember spending weeks after looking at much of the evidence, saying "if this is true"?

    But then I realized the truthers were just asking "how the laws of physics" were broken on 911. Which is pretty sane, opposed to the people who use personal attacks against those simply asking valid scientific questions.

    If you are stuck on the amount of civilians killed on 911 for geo-political reasons. Think about the number of civilians who have died in the illegal Iraq war, fighting for complete lies

  • Thank You for a great video!!!!

  • And it`s not just America that deserves the truth. This 911 fraud has brought untold pain to the entire world. Millions of innocent people murdered in bullshit wars ... rights and freedoms trampled on world wide by means of their never ending war on terrorism`` fraud ... it goes on & on & on.

    Keep up the fight!

  • I find the Video very interesting. thanks for sharing.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @fp2015 Everything you said is blatantly false ... nonsense. And I`m not trying to be rude, just to the point.

    Try doing a little research. Have you even seen a floor plan of these towers ... the sheer number and size of the vertical columns? or talked to someone who understands structural design... These buildings could NEVER have fallen at near freefall speed in a "domino effect" as you say ... without the aid of explosives. IMPOSSIBLE!!!

  • @AIVIBITION first of all I'm not a coward and second(@ warcrime911)there always have to be in everything so don't say that no steel structure has never came down in a fire. remember it was hit by jet planes going at 500-600 mph.

  • @fp2015 These structures were designed to withstand the impact of a plane without collapsing--and furthermore, the "official" report says they came down due to fire (from the jet fuel), not as a result of being hit by an aircraft. The towers collapsed because of internal implosion--it was clearly a controlled demolition. Just because you can't or won't handle that fact does not make it any less true.

  • @fp2015 These towers were designed to be hit by MULTIPLE airliners!

  • The 9/11 Commission NOW reveals that the official version of 9/11 was based on false testimony and documents and is almost entirely untrue. The sources and details of this massive cover-up are carefully outlined in a book by John Farmer, who was the Senior Counsel for the 9/11 Commission.

    Farmer, Dean of Rutger Universities' School of Law and former Attorney General of New Jersey, was responsible for drafting the original flawed 9/11 report.

  • Comment removed

  • @fp2015, If all of this was total bullshit, then surely you can make a response video showing with facts sources and evidence how and why everything was total bullshit...

    That is if you are speaking from a position of information intellectualism and not stubborn ignorance.

  • @WarCrime911 ok first i can't make a video because i don't have the software and my computer is less than shitty and second i was a wittness to the attacks myself and lastly i have seen the facts for myself all the theories of an inside job and demo of the building is just total bullshit! but i have to say the only thing that bothers me is what caused WTC 7 to colapse

  • * Undeniable - 100% Proof of Molten Steel and Explosives. @ watch?v=8YaFGSPErKU

    Neither fires nor a collapse could create molten steel. Even NIST admitted that the temperatures needed to create molten metal and merge steel together - could not have happened due to the official explanation of the collapse

    Debunkers skip what they cannot explain:

    A straight forward video of NIST discussing this, and the irrefutable evidence of Molten Steel. I hope you actually check into both sides of the debate

  • @WarCrime911 They should not allow prison inmates to have the internet.

  • @WarCrime911

    The funny part is is that as this is exposed, no one DARED to challenge it!!

  • @WarCrime911 video one? 

  • @fp2015 haha

  • @fp2015 - *fingers in ears* lalalalallaaalalallaaaaaaaa I'm not listening - all the best scholars, professional people, laws of physics etc are wrong and what my clever president and Fox news are telling me is right - lalalalllalaaaaaaaa - I'm nice n cosy in my home - lalallalalalalaaaaaa

  • @fp2015 How can you call pure science bullshit?

  • so building 7 was not hit by a plane.. 7 of the hijackers are still alive.... um OK then.

  • FBI Admits No Evidence on Bin Laden

    On Jun 5-2006 author Ed Haas contacted the Federal Bureau of Investigation headquarters to ask why, while claiming that bin Laden is wanted for multiple events, but not 9/11!

    Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI responded, The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Osama bin Ladens Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11. Tomb continued, Bin Laden has not been formally charged in connection to 9/11

  • "The FBI's counterterrorism division concluded that the evidence presented by the [Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth] deserves FBI scrutiny. In a letter, Deputy Director Michael J. Heimbach assessed that the group's analysis is "backed by thorough research and analysis."

    Please watch - Zero (A Nobel Prize Winner's 9/11 Documentary) @ watch?v=ofXKiXNDDYA

    and AE911Truth's Blueprint for Truth @ watch?v=b74naeawdCs

  • do you know how retarded you sound?

  • why isn't something being done to bring justice for all the victims? I do not believe what they told us, I just don't know what I can do about it?

  • Your video keeps making the false claim that no building has fallen from fire! You fail to mention the structural damage to each building. Your making the same type of argument that creationist make.

  • @TheNightwing01 1930's Empire state buliding was hit by a B52 bomber. Big fire, explosions etc. no fall! Is that like for like enough?

  • @Updehill B52 is not even close to the same size so no it is not.

  • @TheNightwing01 its in relation to the size of the building it hit!

  • @TheNightwing01 No there really not and it is factually inaccurate to say so. This conversation does not really matter because you already have a personal schema about the issue.

  • @Updehill B25 actually. If the US had B52s in the 1930s WW2 would have lasted about six weeks. A B25 is a rather dinky thing compared to most aircraft today and travelled at rather slower speeds.

  • Looks like someone needs to go to jail.

  • I'm with you brother all the way even if we do know what happened that day

    What are we going to do

  • NIST's assertion that "thermite burns slowly" is highly misleading, because it igores the existence of fast-reacting forms of thermite such as nano-thermites, which are just as explosive as conventional high explosives, and pack about three times as much energy into a given volume. NIST's misdirection here appears particularly disingenuous, since the institute has extensive involvement in research into energetic nano-thermites.

    Just one of many 100's of highly-irregular, suspicious 'lapses'.

  • Hopefully Assange will shed some light on this.

  • @dakr2

    I felt let down by Assange. He openly said he thinks "911 truthers are a waste of time". Which is so backwards, given all the physics and scientifically verifiable evidence proving the conspiracy. Also many of the other atrocities he is reporting on, like the wars and loss of civil liberties are allowed to happen because of the false flag event of 9/11. 911 is the foundation holding up these others lies and agendas, if you take down the 911 lie, they fall too. Why doesn't he get this?

  • @Bi0hazardx Double Agent.

  • List of those publicly in support of a new 9/11 investigation:

    220+ Senior Military, Intelligence Service, Law Enforcement, and Government Officials

    1196+ Engineers and Architects

    250+ Pilots and Aviation Professionals

    400+ Professors Question 9/11

    230+ 9/11 Survivors and Family Members

    Patriots Question 911 . com

    AE911truth . org

    1196+ architectural and engineering pros have signed the petition demanding of Congress a truly independent investigation.

  • lol what?! for a second I thought you were going to argue AGAINST these theories! Wackos! Seriously!!

  • @suchafool990 wackos, youve been provided with 20 min of information and you just call names. Provide alternatives please if you disagree.

  • Comment removed

  • The evidence of US Government Complicity in 9/11 is publicly available and verifiable. Here are the 4 Best videos on the subject. They together will prove without a doubt US government complicity.

    1) Zero - Nobel Prize Winner's Doc (Start here) @ watch?v=ofXKiXNDDYA

    2) 911 Connect the Dots is a great 18 min video @ watch?v=HfmliaqIRBE

    3) Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth - All Science and Physics @ watch?v=b74naeawdCs

    4) 911 Press for Truth (By 911 Victim families) @ watch?v=PSVgnsIJH4Y

  • @Bi0hazardx Cheers for the links mate. I hadn't seen a couple of those.

  • 100+ Mainstream Testimonies of Explosives on 911:

    Live Footage of Over 100+ Firefighters, Police Officers, 1st Responders and Mainstream Newscasters reporting Secondary Explosions? It even has the Head of Safety for the NY Fire Department saying “We need to get out. There appears to be secondary explosives planted through out the building. They kept going off and we had to get our men out”

    Mainstream TV footage from 9/11 of everyone talking about the explosives @ watch?v=8n-nT-luFIw

  • "People can't see explosives that are hidden behind the walls."

    Actually, they couldn't even hide all of those explosions, but withhelding tapes for years that show them does help the cause of keeping them secret, of course:

    watch?v=vSmvq8xOCyY

  • @qwertygecko They were let through and onto the planes to make it look like they were taken down by terrorists, in turn allowing u-ass-of-a's puppet masters into Iraq and afghanistan with the backing of the American population. It also allows them to pass all the new laws taking away your civil liberties and change your constitution without joe public asking questions by way of fear and scaremongering.. why were army jets not scrambled and the planes not taken out before they got to the towers?

  • @qwertygecko Yeah the planes hit the twin towers but not tower 7 Like I said why did tower 7 collapse at freefall speed? nothing hit this tower. it is not possible for a building to fall like this unless it is a controlled demolition. If you can find anywhere in the world a building which has collapsed like this from fire alone then you would have a point,unfortunately it has never happened and never will because it is not possible.

  • @allymltn not only that, what where the causes of the fire in WTC7? The fire was not hot enough to melt steel, even if it was at a tempreture able to to that it would'nt of collapsed at freefall speed, it wouldnt have collapsed the whole building, it would have made part of the building that was on fire to collapse.

  • "jesus conspiracy" lol

  • New JESUS Conspirisy !!! watch video at jagball22

  • OUR GOVT IS CORRUPT AND SHOULD BE TAKEN DOWN!!!

  • hundreds of firemen, police, and workers at the scene reported explosions just before the towers collapsed. They were told to shut up about it

  • The evidence of US Government Complicity in 9/11 is publicly available and verifiable. Here are the 4 Best videos on the subject. They together will prove without a doubt US government complicity.

    1) Zero - Nobel Prize Winner's Doc (Start here) @ watch?v=ofXKiXNDDYA

    2) 911 Connect the Dots is a great 18 min video @ watch?v=HfmliaqIRBE

    3) Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth - All Science and Physics @ watch?v=b74naeawdCs

    4) 911 Press for Truth (By 911 Victim families) @ watch?v=PSVgnsIJH4Y

  • A large number of the 9/11 victim’s family members publicly stated that 70% of their questions were never answered. They have been petitioning for the past 7 years and got a private investigation of 9/11 being brought up on the NYC ballot this upcoming year. They signed away their ability to publicly speak out about 9/11 in order to get their relief funds and treatment for asbestos poising. 80% of 1st responders are dead.

    They are one of the main backbones of 911 Truth.

    NYCCAN org

  • Let's look at this as realistic as it gets. Does anyone actually think that the truth about the whole thing, WILL finally come out by anyone involved? Seriously, if it was this big Government controlled situation, do you honestly think that it will be allowed to be brought into public knowledge? We are talking about the highest elected officials in America. Not just someone off the street. We may think we know the truth, but in all reality it will never ACTUALLY be brought out.

  • @Metalman0189

    220+ US Counter-Terrorism and Intelligence Agent Veterans Challenge the Official Account of 9/11: "a Cover-up," "Terribly Flawed," "a Joke" "Laced with Contradictions,"

    Gov SOURCES: PatriotsQuestion911(DOT)com – (DOT) = “.”

    Please watch - Zero (A Nobel Prize Winner's 9/11 Documentary) @ watch?v=ofXKiXNDDYA

    9/11 victim's families claiming "9/11 was an inside job"

    watch?v=UtU69oWVNJY

    Thermite Scientifically Confirmed @ watch?v=Vy1oPmuZZ98&

    Click Primary Article in description

  • this is why i hate fucken goverment bullshit omfg becuase there to much of puzzyes to say the truth they rated live in silence and not talk about anything why r they hiding this from us we deserved to know wat happen here all im asking is why ! why?

  • The WTC exhibited the following characteristics of destruction by Explosives:

    1. Destruction proceeds through the path of greatest resistance at nearly free-fall acceleration

    2. Improbable symmetry of debris distribution

    3. Extremely rapid onset of destruction

    4. Over 100 first responders reported explosions and flashes

    5. Multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally 600 ft at 60 mph

    6. Mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete & metal decking

  • 7. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds

    8. 1200-foot-dia. debris field: no "pancaked" floors found

    9. Isolated explosive ejections 20 40 stories below demolition front

    10. Total building destruction: dismemberment of steel frame

    11. Several tons of molten metal found under all 3 high-rises

    12. Evidence of activated and unactivated thermite incendiaries found in steel & dust samples: The Smoking Gun.

    13. FEMA steel analysis: sulfidation, oxidation & intergranular melting

  • A large number of the 9/11 victim’s family members publicly stated that 70% of their questions were never answered. They have been petitioning for the past 7 years and got a private investigation of 9/11 being brought up on the NYC ballot this upcoming year. They signed away their ability to publicly speak out about 9/11 in order to get their relief funds and treatment for asbestos poising. 80% of 1st responders are dead.

    They are one of the main backbones of 911 Truth.

    NYCCAN org

  • holy shit you know what your talking about =)

  • @qwertygecko but your jenga example was better was it?

    All I am saying is that people need to learn to question the tripe that governments feed to their populace, as more often than not, it is lies. There are far too many inconsistencies on that day to not question any of them

    I sincerely hope by "read the report" you are not talking about the 9/11 commission report.....that has to be the worst enquiry ever made into any event, it doesn't even address half of the inconsistencies of that day.