Added: 2 years ago
From: FreeRangeStudios
Views: 5,114
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (30)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • There is a big difference between being considerate with your planet, being eco-friendly, and saving resources, and being a green fanatic whose goal is to take control of the economy in order to aim it towards an environmental policy that will supposedly make life better instead of things that really matter such as education, crime, and poverty. PS: The hockey stick graph and many other statistics have been debunked. I also noted they had the guts to use India as an example. Fucking Pricks.

  • Comment removed

  • I wish the USA will force people to ride bicycles.It helps the environment and reduces obesity. WE also need to stop buying stuff from china!!!.That is one reason we are in debt.The second is the unnecessary Iraq war.Third is BUSH'S Addiction to oil.While the US is trying to solve its debt bush is riding his horses and making money while most other people are losing.

    Did anyone notice that before bush we ACTUALLY had money!!! It's BUSH's FAULT. He got us into this problem.He should be paying US!

  • why is the focus ALWAYS on citizens and polluting cars? the real source of the pollution problems are with international corporations that dump millions of tons of pollution into the atmosphere, land and water.

    the other MAJOR polluter is the United States Military. it's funny the US Military & polluting corporations are (successfully) trying to convince everyone to step up, help out, and share the blame with them.

    if those institutions stopped polluting, we wouldn't have a problem.

  • Smooth transitions, easy to understand and visually appealing. 5/5

  • Also cell phones are more of a danger then CO2 as they are wiping out bees and if bees die so does 1/3 of our food supply! The scientific study that involved 22 years of research says CO2 is irrellevent.

  • The majority talks about CO2, while methane hydrate will spiral global warming out of control.

    Methane is 20 times more potent than carbon dioxide as a greenhouse gas

  • @sarcophyllus Cattle is an essential part of human nutrition, and the production of methane is not even that high. Regarding CO2, I must say that, while not only the earth has been through worse (The rise of surface during the dark ages and a couple of glacial periods), there is no way to stop the emission of CO2, for most of the percentage of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere is not man made! And what are we supposed to do about methane? Kill all cows? Please!

  • I would love to see some research on that...could u post a link??

  • lol when i got here there were 350 views <3

  • heh, the music sound like something from The Sims

  • i would advise everybody to read about peak oil and the energy restrictions we are likely to experience in the near future. Of course CO2 emissions are a serious problem that we must solve, but there are more immediate problems that have been killing millions for decades and very little has been done. The big powers are trying to make covert energy policy disguised as environmental policy, there's little genuine concern about the planet.

  • I wouldn't expect this kinda crap from the FRS...

  • So you are saying that we should just continue the destruction of the planet? Pollution is a lie? Destruction of forests, the factories of oxygen we cold not survive without, is a lie? Pollution of air, water & food that are also essential in the survival of humankind is a lie?

  • No, pollution is ofcourse not a lie. But the fearmongering that's been going on is not quite scientific either. On the other hand, it's probably the best way to get the attention of the general public to instigate a change in attitude to work toward a cleaner future.

  • The People that are doing the destruction are the same ones instituting a global change. They're intentions are not to change anything- Do you really think Exxon Mobile will risk profits because of "the environment" DON'T ever fool yourself... A few greedy corporations put this world in this state. The general population is not the problem, Capitalism is...

    Carbon Footprint My Ass! Freaking Fear tactics built to keep you away from reality. Do your research gearzone2611 is right...

  • ALL of the people are doing the destruction! It just differs in scale and impact to the environment.

    And you are right about capitalism and the corporations, but it's no excuse for any of us to destroy and pollute our home.

    We must remember that we do not own this planet, we are just borrowing it from future generations.

  • People are doing the destruction? Like the need of depopulating the earth, and privatize the wealth and the rights of the people. It differs because globalization is at hands thru so called climate change. The destruction of the environment is nothing but an elite agenda, to obscure the truth from the people. With this, the need of a new law to erode everyone's right for the sake of "protectionism" of the environment. They'll waste money to taxed the people to fund such any inter.organizations!!

  • Theres so many destruction of the planet. This climate change is one of the few. Science always and has proved it that our climate does change. Why would I say pollution is a lie, its a fact that we have it. Destruction of forests is a lie, because every time when they cut down a trees, they replace it with 3/5 plants/trees. Who ever beleive that we do not need air, water and food? What are you trying to say to support that climate change is a global destruction and it need global-elite agenda?!

  • destruction =/=  pollution

    lie= global warm

    truth = pollution exists in those eco friendly CFL bulbs

  • @jellofast I never did say that destruction is the same as pollution. But both are bad and will eventually make life on the planet impossible. Because when you keep destroying habitat and polluting the air/water/food what do you have left?

  • Retard ...

    Somebody has there milta ready

  • Real science says otherwise.

  • the science of exxon and other oil companies say that the Arctic ice is going to melt. And they are very happy about it, so they will not need icebreakers to get the oil and gas out of there.

  • care to elaborate?

  • Sure. Type in this title and watch the presentation: "Updated with Slides - Lord Christopher Monckton Speaking in St. Paul"

    Very informative.

  • use google and search for: oil companies and Arctic ice.

  • bs?

    what does lord monckton say?

  • WINNER!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more