Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition [10/26]

[anthonyharris2009]

If the foundations were completely destroyed, how are the foundations still there today? The only thing that I don't understand about September 11th 2001, is how 'Terrorists' managed to fly into New York... TWICE. Forget all of the rubbish about bombs and controlled demolition. Tell me how two planes flew straight into these towers with no interception at all. If I had been in control of the fighter jets, they would have been deployed to bring them down. The first I can probably excuse, but two?

[VIDARMATHISEN]

@anthonyharris2009 - controlled demolitions happend even in building nr 7

[JeppeHagh]

Anyways, no more responses from me in here now. Completly a waste of time

[JeppeHagh]

Link is:

fbi.gov/wanted/topten/usama-bi­n-laden

[mujaku]

There is no seismic evidence for such a hypothesis. If fact 9/11 seismic evidence is hardly above background.

[JeppeHagh]

everything can put together to form some sort of conspiracy theory. Ever seen that movie "the number 23" .. lol..

You guys are lame

[JeppeHagh]

why did i end here, and why do you stupid people dedicate your lives to seeking out and yapping about all kinds of insane conspiracy theories? Everything from Elvis and tupac being alive, to judgementday is near. And now this... Its just ridicolous! Get a life instead man!

[mujaku]

@JeppeHagh The government's own "conspiracy theory" (Muslims did it) is the most implausible. Not even the FBI wanted Osama bin Landen for 9/11.

[JeppeHagh]

@mujaku Do you even do the research before you belive bulls**t like that?

"Bin Laden became the 456th person listed on the FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitives list, when he was added to the list on June 7, 1999, following his indictment along with others for capital crimes in the 1998 embassy attacks."

Try to google: FBI Osama Bin Laden

The first site that comes up is his "wanted profile" at fbi.gov

[mujaku]

@JeppeHagh I have been to the FBI site off and on for years. Usama, the name they use, is NOT wanted for 9/11. Duh.

[JeppeHagh]

@mujaku He was already added to the list in 1999, thats the reason why it does not say "wanted for attacks on WTC" it thats what you want to hear?

It says: "Usama Bin Laden is wanted in connection with the August 7, 1998, bombings (...) In addition, Bin Laden is a suspect in other terrorist attacks throughout the world"

The last part was added November 2001

[mujaku]

@JeppeHagh Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI responded, “The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Osama bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11.”

[2009korte]

what about the planes?

[Emin7]

He fuckin knows ! great post tyvm

[wheelmanstan]

The government does this type of stuff all the time, check out operation northwoods. And look at the media, "pearl harbor" even came out only a few months before 9/11 to get everybody conditioned. But none of that matters because there were explosions, thre are witnesses to large explosions in the basement and lobbies, and they have found nano-thermite and molten steel.

[dominic150]

ummm, am i the only person that thinks this is the worst explaination for the collapse of the towers ever? The foundation was intact, thats why the Hudson river didnt spill in and fill up the basements. The slurry walls were damaged, but only slightly. The ground foundation was intact. His explaination makes no sense because the ground foundation was intact, there was no gaping hole.

[Tupasc]

@dominic150 actually those weren't ground foundations, that what was left of the roof... If you think about it this explains so much, like why after 3 months there was still MOLTEN STEEL under the remains of WTC!!!

[dominic150]

@Tupasc His numbers are way off. I sent you some links since i cant seem to be able to post them here directly. Example, for a 100kt nuke, the optimal underground depth is 192 meters. He is talking about a 150kt nuke. The blast cavity of a single 150kt nuke wouls encompass the entire WTC complex, given this, then the first nuke would destroy the other 2. The desired effects would be impossible.

[o0urbad0o]

i agree with this 100% it makes perfect sence.. i always knew 911 was done by the us government.. but dint know bout this untill now, but it makes 100% sence, who ever say it is a lie is a fucking tool.

[amidopur]

For me it is still unbelievable, to push a red button and then pulverise at least

1500 Human Beings per tower. Who is able to do that?

Anyway, thank you very much for Your Explanations, on a physical Level,

so that every child , may be from the Third Schoolyear on, is capible to

understand this.

[Vengrence]

@amidopur Some people would push a button to kill millions, what is 1500 compared to that?

[1yummster1]

No the ground is not shaking at all. There are literally over 50 Cameras filming the building none of which show any other shaking just your stupid camera was shaking the building was not. Film from INSIDE the building does not show any shaking either your a COMPLETE FAKE

[tsbaurzhan]

@1yummster1 can you explain what means "ground zero" termin?

[1yummster1]

Also how did all the Gold and Silver survive the so called nuclear explosion ?? Those pictures your showing don't even come close to the depth of where the gold was stored. Being that the gold was stored closer to the Nuc the gold would have been liquid. Nice try Dimitri wrong answer.  Gold and Silver came out just fine.

[Massaricossudo]

@1yummster1

Do u hv any proof of what u r saying? Not all the underground was exploded on 911. And Dimitri Khalezov explains why the buildings were dustified...

[d0lli2k]

@1yummster1 who says that the gold was found in the ruins of the towers? Some say it was found under WTC 5...

[1yummster1]

LOL THATS NOT THE TOWER SHAKING its the f in g camera. What is wrong with you people. You can tell me the bomb exploded and caused the camera to shake but the building is not shaking.

[Massaricossudo]

@1yummster1

The ground is shaking.... 150 kilotons....

[ed11561]

5:39 PULVERIZATION WAVE of an ATOMIC BOMB TOOK 12 SECONDS TO GO UP THE 110 FLOORS? HORSESHIT.

[anthonyc31]

@ed11561 no, it was actually instantaneous shithead. But like i said, and as it's becoming obvious to everyone that's following your comments, you're really just too stupid to understand any of this. I've come to the conclusion that you may actually be too stupid to work as a disinfo agent too.

[ed11561]

77 METERS below the surface would have been BEDROCK or WATER SATURATED land that if any tunnel were ever built IT WOULD BE FULL OF WATER FROM THE HUDSON RIVER. That part of NYC was a build out into the hudson. The WTC sat in a CONCRETE BATHTUB to keep the water out. After 911 the BATHTUB was STILL INTACT. BYE BYE TO THIS "THEORY."

[anthonyc31]

@ed11561 again, google "Workers Rush To Repair Huge Hole In WTC Bathtub" and you'll find an interesting article on NY1 (dot) com. But don't let facts and evidence get in the way of your moronic rants fuckball .... keep digging holes with unfounded comments ... the only thing you should say goodbye to is your c r e d i b i l i t y and to your former "9/11 researcher" title. But, hey, at least you can say hello to your new and more apt title of fuckball. Well, at least you're a great fuckball.

[ed11561]

ALSO don't forget there were explosions all morning & they were NOT ATOMIC explosions.

[anthonyc31]

@ed11561 is that all you got? Wow. You're pathetic.

[ed11561]

Dr. Rokke says the culprit for cancer diagnosis of 9/11 workers is, "A combination of toxic compounds from combustion and explosions and uranium ballast." He explained, "Depleted Uranium [DU] is used as ballast in commercial aircraft. And they [the airlines] are privy to that information."

[anthonyc31]

@ed11561 awww, how convenient that Dr. Rokke says something that keeps the truth hidden. Wow. I guess that's it everyone ... stop researching ... Dr. Rokke and Mr. Ed have solved the 9/11 mystery. Nice try you shill scumbag.

[NDoraku]

Sounds credible...but there is 1 problem:

If the scenario was like described at 8:30 to 9:30 and anything became to microscopic dust, how could firemen Richard Picciotto and Jay Jonas survived it?

They were both about the 10th floor when the North Tower collapsed, and both men survived, including other 5-6 people which where close to them.

How can people survived a zone which was transformed to "microscophic dust"?

[Sadik0gungor91]

@NDoraku

They wear like characters in fallout...

[anthonyc31]

@NDoraku there were many claims of survivors during the collapses ... the ones i looked into were disinfo (i.e. paid actors) ... you can google that and see that various researchers have proven this out. However that's not to say there are some open questions.I think it's fair to investigate this further. Note that the "shock" wave traveling up the buildings would be destructive to anything it touched. IMO (completely up for debate), there may have been a slight opportunity to avoid the wave.

[realistromeo]

Problem with his theory is that "as he stated" a blast would follow least resistance, the lobbies were already blown out windows gone, thus the "blast' would escape out the sides of the building first, i never saw huge granite chunks or dust debris expulged from the lobby or the other floors near ground level, his nuclear reaction didnt even have enought power to reveal itself out the sides of the building, look at 8:35 of his "movies" why would the blast climb the walls? and not escape outward

[iam1inamil]

@realistromeo ....i think the answer to why the blast did not exit the lower floors is INERTIA........take a 2 inch pipe for example 2 ft long with a few holes in it blow compressed air thru it and feel how much air comes out at the end of the pipe verses the side holes....hardly any because the air is traveling so fast it shoots mostly out the end of the pipe

[realistromeo]

@iam1inamil do 2 inch pipes have 70+ concrete floors? i think it's easier to get through windows than 4 inch thick concrete. I wouldnt rule out some kind of Nuke blast though at least when the banana peel ejections covered the last 1/3rd of the building... i dunno. But i guess what you mean is that the blast was forced upwards by least resistance underground... still i just dont see it. Elements of radiation should still be detectable all around the city and in the fresh kills landfill.

[iam1inamil]

@realistromeo ...underground nukes dont give of the radiation much...besides if i remember fro a differant video there was a gasous cloud eminating from the rubble for days afterwards ,and seems like i remember they were tested for radiation....dont quote me on that but i think it was the dr judy woods info.....another thing i am not sure about that i stated a question earlier was ...are there even any VIDEOS of the exact moment in question?

[anthonyc31]

@iam1inamil The underground blast does produce radiation, but it goes off in all directions. The radiation headed for ground level is the real safety concern. As Dimitri explains, the rock absorbs the vast majority of the radiation .. but some radiation will be present. That's why over 10% of 9/11 Rescue Workers now suffer from radiation related illnesses.

[anthonyc31]

@iam1inamil ... also, remember that the NYC firefighters used powreful "ultra-violet absorbers" to help contain the underground fires many weeks after the collapses. Google "Ground Zero's fires still burning" and you'll find an article that details this on newscientist (dot) com. "Ultra-violet light" is another term for X-Rays and Gamma Rays, which is exactly what is produced from a nuclear detonation. That's a very compelling piece of evidence that fully supports Dimitri's explanation.

[anthonyc31]

@iam1inamil there is no such thing as "exiting" in this shock wave. The wave travailed along solid materials, not air. The building was one unit connected to a foundation. Once the shock waves from the 3 individual detonations hit each respective foundation of WTC 1,2 & 7, all materials resting on that foundation were affected. The wave actually skipped the holes which is why the top part of WTC 2 fell at such an angle.

[anthonyc31]

@iam1inamil (Part 2) .... watch this video watch?v=cFz9TZUyIZk ... watch how the top 100-150' of the WTC falls at a 30+ degree angle down through the rest of the pulverized building. The explosives that were set off on those floors (it was not planes) created holes in the building, which distorted the shock wave, hence creating an imbalanced structural section. That in-tact top section fell through the rest of the building, which was pulverized, to create the massive dust storm we saw.

[iam1inamil]

@realistromeo .....and dont forget there is disintigration of everything, reducing resistance.....besides is there any video of the ground floors at the precise time the towers started disintegrating ?....this would have to be quite precise timing with the supposed nuke dtonation to be able to hypothosize logically

[anthonyc31]

@iam1inamil Exactly, nobody talks about the incredible precision required do execute a traditional "floor-by-floor" demolition on two 1,400' towers. That's 2,800' of steel building to demolish, without a single problem. That is, the towers fell perfectly into their own footprint. If that's the case, where is the enormous pile of debris??? Nowhere. But we do see an utterly incredible dust storm, which supports Dimitri's explanation perfectly. Good point guy.

[anthonyc31]

@realistromeo the nuclear blast wave doesn't "explode" things ... it pulverizes materials into dust. However, as Dimitri carefully explains, the pulverized object does not crumble .. it retains it's shape and color and actually appears to be 100% fine. Disturbing the object would crumble it. If you watch the last 10 minutes of Part 1 (and first 10 minutes of Part 2) of Dimitri's interview on my channel, he explains how the in-tact top part of the WTC fell through the pulverized building.

[realistromeo]

@anthonyc31 i just cannot buy it, i am not in the least bit learned in the nuke biz, but when something is pulverized why would it retain it's shape? it would already be disturbed by the 1)blast wave 2) the intense molecular disturbance... and it could not retain it's weight holding ability. the foundation would have been compromised first and fall into the hole created bottom up , this is a poorly thought out theory, just my 2 cents. standard demo is a given, exotic weapons are a possibility

[anthonyc31]

@realistromeo well, i'm not here to sell you anything, you have to do your own research to find answers. I suggest googling "Gasbuggy" and "Plowshare" and read the articles that explain the 1967 underground nuclear experiment. The results of that blast are inline with what Dimitri explains. Also watch watch?v=ZGXS_Qgfqno. Note "molecular disturbance" is not Dimitri's claim -- pulverization is. Watch Part 1 to learn the difference. And, Dimitri does not propose a "theory", he provides testimony.

[happosai27]

its very compelling but one part i dont get. why dont we see windows, glass or other stuff flying out of the tower from the bottom up when its blown up from below?

[anthonyc31]

@happosai27 the building doesn't "blow up" as with TNT .. it's reduced to dust (pulverized). The blast wave turned the first 300m of WTC 1 & 2 into dust, and turned the next 50 meters into "crushed material" (very small pieces of rubble). The remaining top ~50 meters remained undamaged because the 150kt charge was not enough to pulverize the entire 1400 feet. WTC 7 was completely pulverized and the rubble we see was from a false wall built later, not attached to the foundation.

[happosai27]

@anthonyc31 i see i see.. i try to understand it. its the most reasonable explaination so far i have to admit. even if it still sounds crazy ^^ but the nuclear demolitionthing cant be denied

[anthonyc31]

@happosai27 I suggest just watching Part 1 of the Dimitri interview on my channel ... I merged all 26 parts to create just 2 videos and sped up the playback by 20% so it's easier to follow. In Part 1, Dimitri explains the WTC demolition in very good detail -- you will learn a lot. After watching Part 1, you will know exactly how WTC 1 & 2 were demolished. The first section of Part 2 explains what happened to WTC 7 and the missile that hit the Pentagon. Good luck.

[destructOzap]

i don`t wanna discuss,for i´m not an expert,like the most of you.but it is the only theorie,that explains all that dust and that " funny " way ,they came down. every house,i did see colaps, looked totaly different to me.that looked like...well..you know...

you `ve seen it by yourself

[ed11561]

5:08 The camera shakes before the towers come down is 100% correct but that was from the demolition EXPLOSIVES that were in the basement levels & also thruout the buildings.

NOT nuclear bombs or devices.

The elevators were being "SERVICED" for 2 YEARS-so there was plenty of time to install all explosives in the towers.Service was even shut down the weekend b4 911 in alot of the elevators.Radio receivers turned on-ELECTRICITY shut off-COMPLETE POWER DOWN the weekend b4 911-BOMB dogs removed.

[anthonyc31]

@ed11561 Explain to the world how two 1400' towers were fitted with "explosives" and nobody working in the buildings saw anything to suggest? Then explain, how commercial "planes" flown by Muslim "terrorist" no less, fit into this picture? So was at an "inside job" + "crazy terrorists"? The logic of 9/11 "truth hiders" is beyond flawed ... 10 years of chasing your fucking tales around like morons -- thermite, inside job, planes .. all BS. The truth is Dimitri's explanation. Wake the fuck up.

[ed11561]

Dimitri is a DISINFO FOOL who was put on the internet with his "theory" to make 911 TRUTHERS look like total morons.Put him with No-Planers & they really make 911 truthers look like nut jobs.

[anthonyc31]

@ed11561 surely you realize by now how stupid you look trying to argue with the truth. Or maybe you're too stupid to realize that.

[luvmyctd]

So, the way I see it .... anyone with at least a grade 5 or 6 education should be able to finally understand what happened to the Towers at least, on 9/11 ... after watching this video series.

Fuck ... finally, something that explains precisely what happened!!

[ed11561]

@luvmyctd Come on ATOMIC BOMBS planted underneath the towers from 1970? GET THE FUCK OUTTA HERE. LOL AHAHAHAH

[luvmyctd]

@ed11561 He never said the bombs were placed there in the 70s.

Watch the 26 part interview with Dimitri here on YT if interested ... you may be able to understand what he's saying more clearly. Good luck

[ed11561]

@luvmyctd He never said the bombs were placed there in the 70s.BULLSHIT You go watch the interview-I saw it 3 times-talked to Dimitri numerous times until i told him he was insane&he blocked me.lol

He told me the builders of the WTC had to have DEMOLITION PLANS in place b4 they would be allowed to build.They placed ATOMIC DEVICES(bombs)under the towers B4 THEY BUILT THE BUILDINGS.so they could destroy them later on-total fucking horseshit.You might try watching it again& QUESTIONING HIM.Havefun

[luvmyctd]

@ed11561 No, it has been stated that the devices were stored and maintained under Building 7 ... transferred by remote tunnels. Precisely why the Towers had to be imploded in the order they were ... so the other tunnel would not be damaged by the first explosion. Clearly stated ... as usual you are mistaken.

[ed11561]

@luvmyctd "it has been stated that the devices were stored and maintained under Building 7" ...NO SHIT SHERLOCK=WHAT PART OF NUCLEAR BOMBS UNDER THE WTC "PROPERTY" DON'T YOU GET GENIUS?

hahahahah TOTAL FUCKING HORSESHIT. If you're moronic enough to believe that ANY NUCLEAR DEVICES were planted under the towers at all,then you're as fucking NUTS as he is.

You as usual are ridiculously gullible to his horseshit.hahahaha

[anthonyc31]

@ed11561 "hahahaha" you sure do know a lot about horseshit Mr. Ed. I see that you spend a lot of time shoveling it on these forums.

[ed11561]

@luvmyctd 1:08 "Undergound nuclear explosion 500 METERS DEEP." is 1640 FEET

The WTC towers were built IN A TUB-that kept out the water of the Hudson River. They were built partly on BEDROCK which if this fool is correct would have been blown to kingdom come.The concrete which the subbasements were built were COMPLETELY UNDISTURBED and they only went down about 70 to 100 FEET NOT 1640'.

If that happened that entire section of NYC would be UNDERWATER. HAHAHA Fucking RIDICULOUS.

THINK it helps!

[anthonyc31]

@ed11561 yes, thinking does help ... try it.

[ed11561]

@luvmyctd "transferred by remote tunnels." BUILT INTO GRANITE BEDROCK 1640 FEET DEEP? LOL LMFAO HAHAHA. With not 1 area under the towers destroyed by any kind of explosion-the WTC TUB FLOOR was not penetrated by anything. The EXPLOSIVES-whatever kind they used, were attached to the steel in the various sub-basements-most likely in all the elevator shafts-which was the main supporting structure in the center of the buildings.

Totally PULLED DOWN by the destruction of the insanely thicksteelbeams

[luvmyctd]

@ed11561 Look bud, you had your FACTS wrong so I corrected you. I don't know how exactly they imploded the Towers & neither do you or any of the rest of us. Thermate or whatever version of it you want to refer to does not turn steel and concrete to dust the way we can SEE it in the videos. As far as "nukes", it is the ONLY thing that makes sense unless it was some technoogy we are unaware of. The atomic/nuclear plan for demolition is TRUE. Do you research ... it is FACT! Google & get reading ..

[ed11561]

@luvmyctd Look bud STEEL didn't turn to dust genius-the concrete did. You don't SEE stell turn to dust you see it FALL very quickly straight down.LEAVING A TRAIL OF DUST. Get it?

The atomic/nuclear plan for demolition is TRUE.-HORSE-FUCKING SHIT. Show me the PROOF-show me the SOURCE show me the PLANS. There were NEVER any nuclear plan for demolition-SHOW ME THE SOURCE.

This is old horseshit from YEARS AGO that i already investigated.Shit i just showed u it was IMPOSSIBLE.The TUB was not broken

[ed11561]

@luvmyctd How the fuck are you going to build 500 Meter(1640FEET) under the towers IN BEDROCK(GRANITE) & IGNITE these Nuclear Bombs(devices) WITHOUT destroying the concrete floor of the WTC FOUNDATION? You can't

The TUB that was made so water from the hudson could not get in was undisturbed by any of the demolitions.

Military DEMOLITIONS makes perfect sense-they have many many powerful explosives they use.AND they have used Thermate/thermite FOR YEARS.SHOW ME PROOF GENIUS.there is none.hahaha

[ed11561]

@luvmyctd BTW all your facts are bullshit.Google doesn't have shit on nuclear devices under the WTC COMPLEX that wasn't STARTED BY THIS MORON -DIMITRI.

If you want to believe that fucking rubbish go right ahead-i don't give a fuck.But all he is is a disinfo asshole who is full of shit.You don't even know if this asshole is russian.And it took him YEARS to come out with this horseshit.

watch?v=u5IgqJXyLbg&feature=ch­annel_video_title

Try listening to a REAL DEMO GUY who worked for CDI hahaha

[anthonyc31]

@ed11561 sorry mate, if you are REALLY interested in the truth, you will need to watch the Dimitri interview with an open mind. Google "911 rescue workers radiation sickness" for starters.

[ed11561]

@anthonyc31 I've watched this guy a few times-all the way thru-at different times and i don't believe any of the more ridiculous horseshit that he spews. First off he says before the CITY of NY would give them a permit to build, they had to have proof of being about to demolish the towers without destroying any other nearby buildings.TOTAL HORSESHIT.Then he said they had NUCLEAR BOMBS stored in 1 area-probably WTC 7 & they has RAILROADS under the towers to deliver the bombs-SHEER NONSENSE. haha

[ed11561]

@anthonyc31 911 was definitely a CONTROLLED DEMOLITION using whatever materials but i doubt it was an actual Hydrogen Bomb Or Atomic weapon PREPLANTED there for 25 Plus years.That is way beyond what even i believe & i do believe it was definitely done by the government shadow warriors(cia)&parts of the Pentagon along with help from israel& possibly pakistan.The military probably have very advanced destructive chemicals besides the thermite & they were totally involved in 911.

[anthonyc31]

@ed11561 if you watched his explanation in full (as you say you did) i have nothing more to add. The vast majority of people that actually watch Dimitri's explanation realize that he is speaking truthfully. The remaining skeptics either 1) did not watch him in full, 2) did not understand the explanation, 3) are unwilling to reevaluate their current 9/11 theories of what happened (e.g Thermite, planes etc.), 4) or are being paid to bash him. I suspect you may be in camp #3, which is fair.

[ed11561]

@anthonyc31 Also most of those 911 rescue workers radiation sickness websites weren't even up until this guy Dimitri started posting his "theory." As a matter of fact,a couple look like his sites-complete with all his bad english.

I think he's more of a DIS-INFO AGENT than anything else.

[anthonyc31]

@ed11561 ... as for the radiation sickness "websites", just google the numerous articles from independent sources. Never rely on just a few sites for evidence, you have to dig. Google "wtc ice age glaciers" to see the melted rock under WTC. Google "Workers Rush To Repair Huge Hole In WTC 'Bathtub' - NY1.com to read about the giant 90' hole in NY's "bathtub" retaining wall. Spend some time on Dimitri's explanation with an open mind and you'll realize he's telling the truth.

[ed11561]

@anthonyc31 Bullshit he's still full of shit

[anthonyc31]

@ed11561 you are unwilling, unable, too stupid or simply too stubborn to realize that Dimitri's explanation is the truth. You spew nonsense rebuttals that hold zero validity (yet you try to come off as some authority on 9/11 because you "read" some books and "watched" some videos). You are a moron. Do i have to remind you that you are in fact not arguing with me or my ideas about 9/11, fuckball, you are trying (that's a generous word) to argue with an FBI MATERIAL WITNESS TO 9/11.

[ed11561]

@anthonyc31 you are unwilling, unable, too stupid or simply too stubborn to realize that Dimitri's explanation is the dumbest fucking thing ever heard. hahaha

SHOW PROOF ASSHOLE....YOU HAVE NONE.

to argue with an FBI MATERIAL WITNESS TO 9/11.-WHO-WHAT-WHEN-WHERE-WHY-­HOW-SHOW PROOF ASSHOLE- SOURCE INFORMATION SALLY. just to say it MEANS NOTHING STUPID. Especially coming from an idiot asshole like you. hahahaha

[anthonyc31]

@ed11561 what a shame, i beat you up already ... like a simple minded child you've resorted to using my comments as part of your replies because you have, as i already explained, no originality. That actually stems from you trying to argue with the truth from a position of weakness. Your desperation is growing. Give it up fuckball .. you add nothing to this conversation other than cries of stupidity.

[ed11561]

@anthonyc31 The CITY OF NY would not give permission to build WITHOUT DEMOLITION PLANS IN PLACE???Are you out of your fucking mind?? You BELIEVE this horseshit?? LOL Boy there are suckers born every minute.

His "theory" is fucking laughable.

And that giant hole is SIX MONTHS AFTER 911. -How fucking GIANT could it be? It's not.

The collapse of the south tower tore the large gash in the wall September 11. A LARGE GASH IN THE SIDE-NOT THE BOTTOM- good luck with that bullshit theory.Dimitri lies

[anthonyc31]

@ed11561 the only horseshit i see is in your comments Mr. Ed.. You realize that Dimitri is an FBI material witness, right? You realize that everything that Dimitri presents actually checks out in spades? So the remaining debate is are you a) just another paid shill slinging your BS to hide the truth or b) a sloppy researcher-wanna-be or worse yet c) just a digital big mouth fuckball that has no clue about about what he's saying. Pick one.

[ed11561]

@anthonyc31 You realize that everything that Dimitri presents actually checks out in spades?OH REALLY? Other than your worship of this fraud,show me ANYTHING that proves this claim....ANYTHING.

Show me the PERMITS TO PLACE ATOMIC WEAPONS underneath the towers. Show me PROOF that they had to plant ATOMIC BOMBS under the towers b4 they could be built. YOU MY STUPID FRIEND ARE A DELUSIONAL ASSHOLE DOUCHEBAG. hahaha DUMB AS A FUCKING DOORKNOB to believe this trash.

PROVE your shit or FUCK OFF jerk

[anthonyc31]

@ed11561 ahh, upper case screams of frustration ... when all else fails, post louder. You're a total fucking moron. I warned you ... you're in over your head and now you're drowning. You may be able to hold your own with other bullshit artists 'cause you guys exchange, well, bullshit. You've been swimming in it for so long, it seems normal to you. Dimitri exposes the truth of 9/11 which threatens your bullshit comfort level so now you cry and scream. Too bad but your bullshit stops here.

[ed11561]

@anthonyc31 For anyone to believe that ATOMIC DEMOLITION BOMBS were planted under the Towers for 30 YEARS has to be a complete moronic asshole retard. lol Note-EMPHASIS- on atomic demolition bombs? Not screaming asshole. EMPHASIS of your stupidity. lol

Show me the PLANS(again emphasis stupid) requiring Demolition b4 permission to build the towers could proceed. WHERE ARE THEY ASSHOLE?(that's yelling schmuck.-lmfao) You are dumb as a donut to believe nuclear devices were planted for 30 years.

[anthonyc31]

@ed11561 The proof and evidence are the 4 hours of video fuckball. To others following along, it was a nuclear demolition device which is the same technology used to create hermetically sealed underground chambers used for holding liquids and gas. The nuclear detonation disintegrates the rock to create a sealed cavity. Crushed zone and damaged zones follow which deliver additional destruction. Radiation (X-Rays) are mainly absorbed by the ground. There is no blast wave and no ionizing radiation.

[anthonyc31]

@ed11561 i almost forgot fuckface .... the ball is in your court, shit-for-brains, to disprove the explanation .... this should be interesting. Please show the world your inabilities and crazy mad uppercase-typin' skillz fuckball. I've dismantled many shitheads and disinfo agents (at least they have the sense to stop as they realize their psy-ops playbook is not good enough to spin this topic) ... but onward into stupidville you march. Don't forget that shovel of yours shithead.

[ed11561]

@anthonyc31 I've done more research on 911 than you have ever even looked at.Read dozens of books on the subject & watched this trash through 3 times-IT'S FULL OF HOLES SCHMUCK.

bESIDES AN atomic blast COULD NOT BE CONTAINED or directed stupid. The whole bathtub would have blown to smithereens dummy. This guy is a FRAUD-meant to make the 911 Truth movement look like fucking nuts.

But you're too stupid to see it.Undeground Bomb railroads?? HAHAHAHAHA In solid bedrock. hahahaha Show me the PROOF

[anthonyc31]

@ed11561 The more you post the more obvious it becomes to everyone what a fuckball you really are. To make a claim like that requires a level of retardation reserved for underachieving children. I'm confident that you are supremely unqualified to discuss "atomic blasts" in any capacity or to postulate the validity of Dimitri's explanation, which is by the way, FBI testimony, but feel free to ignore reality. The proof, jackass, is the 4 hour documentary interview that you claim to have watched.

[anthonyc31]

@ed11561 furthermore ... "HAHAHAHAHA" is the hallmark signature of a disinfo scumbag fuckball. I really hope you're just a regular fuckball that doesn't know jack shit, and not a paid shill. Either way, save the lame ridicule for own jackass comments as it seems you have a nack for creating wonderful opportunities for self-abuse. It should be clear to people reading that you're in over your head with this topic fuckball.

[ed11561]

@anthonyc31 furthermore ... "HAHAHAHAHA" is the hallmark signature of a disinfo scumbag fuckball."

THAT'S RIDICULOUS. hahahahahaha I've forgotten more about 911 than you'll ever know asshole. And not horseshit "THEORIES"either.

[anthonyc31]

@ed11561 Hey shit-for-brains.... realize that you have blown your cover and have shown yourself to be exactly what i suspected ... a fucking loser shill. Keep it up jackass. "Ridiculous", "hahaha" .... sooo original. How are you going to ever get promoted to head cocksucking shill with those lame ass remarks? You lack substance and originality ... i'm here to expose ALL shills and i've just busted you fuckball. The "hahaha" is truly on in your face. Enjoy.

[ed11561]

@anthonyc31 Hey shit-for-brains.... realize that you have blown your cover and have shown yourself to be exactly what i suspected ... a fucking loser shill.HEY MORON WITH HALF A BRAIN(i'm being generous) I firmly believe 911 was an inside job by PARTS of the US government-CIA-Pentagon&inside­rs with a little help from Israel&possibly Pakistan-ISI head Gen.Mahmoud Ahmed who gave Mohammed Atta $100,000 right b4 911.So if i'm a SHILL asshole then YOU ARE MARY POPPINS SCHMUCK. HAHAHAHA fucking loser

[anthonyc31]

@ed11561 the only horseshit here is in the comments you and your lacky wanna-be-researchers spew. Your commentary on this topic is without basis and you simply try to participate by typing in upper case ... like a child. I need no luck in supporting Dimitri's testimony, you on the other hand, need a mountain of imagination and a bigger shovel as you continue your fruitless efforts to spew bullshit. I warned you fuckhead, this topic is for serious researchers not fuckballs like you.

[ed11561]

@luvmyctd  911research.wtc7 . net/wtc/analysis/theories/nucl­ear.html

watch?v=u5IgqJXyLbg&feature=ch­annel_video_title

I've FORGOTTEN more research than you will ever know.

READ- 911LIES, Crossing the Rubicon, Debunking 911 debunking, 911Commission Report(lol) Debunking 911 Myths, The New Pearl Harbor, INside Job, Painful Questions, Do some REAL research.Get busy.lol hahahaha

MY facts aren't wrong at all.Open your eyes&ears.

[anthonyc31]

@ed11561 so do you share the "ed11561" account with other disinfo fuckballs, or are is this your own special fuckball account?

[titytit]

you CAN actually see that the tower is swaying and shaking about after the camera shakes....thats actually quite interesting.

[titytit]

i think what makes this hold the most water is this guy is a specialist and knows a lot about this subject....

[anthonyc31]

@titytit i agree. I discovered Dimitri's interview last year and was amazed at the level of detail in the answers he provided. I got stuck on his claim of "no planes" for about a week while researched it in-depth. I hadn't heard about that before and thought it was over-the-top at first. I watched the NOSED OUT video and that really opened my eyes. I already knew that no plane hit the Pentagon (that was beyond obvious) which helped in realizing that maybe planes hitting the WTC was a lie too.

[Massaricossudo]

@anthonyc31

911 was an outside job...

[anthonyc31]

@Massaricossudo it was a complicated job that was both inside and outside. Learning the truth about 9/11 requires people to really think about what they are told and what they find. People must throw out virtually everything they know (or think they know) about the events on 9/11, and work backwards from the aftermath to what happened to cause it.

[Massaricossudo]

@anthonyc31

I am Brazilian... And where I come from... government conspiracies r a rule of thumb, they just don't care. However, when I immigrated to the US, I thought things here were a little different... and it is, but assuming the truth actually hurts a lot even for a foreigner like me.

[TheGralswaechter]

@ hablerz: That´s a misunderstanding! I don´t want to suggest that the russians did 9/11! It was for sure a plot by the CIA and parts of the US-Government. But we have to ask in what way they´ve made this controlled domition. Did they use only thermite? (Prof. Steven Jones) or was the WTC additionaly to this explosives nuked? Khalezov thinks they had to install nuclear-devices (50m above the basement) to get the permission to build such a tall steel-framed building. We have to research this!

[anthonyc31]

@TheGralswaechter Minor correction, the claim was not "50m above the basement", the claim is 77 meters below ground, which was ~50 meters below the foundation of WTC 1 and 2.

[TheGralswaechter]

@anthonyc31 : Yes, you are right! I works only this way....

[mikefan09]

it was certainly an israali-jewish american sayanim traitor job, or basically a jewish job, maybe some gentile freemasons with no soul involved but key jew military andintel agents betraying the nation and ordering all others to act in ways that allow the attack, probably without them realising it, since they prob didnt know wot was coming, kgb might be behind israel in this since there is speculation kgb runs mossad. there is motive in that russia still fights america, read anatoly golitsyn

[mikefan09]

he exposes truths others have never said, nuclear details, russian involvement, at least in tech, the granit missile used on pentagram etc. very interesting, yes possbile intel mindfuck, but not lies i dont think, possible actual intel truth job by kgb, though i suspect there is a deeper level, of russian participation, possbily perpetrators of the attack to distract america into the middle east, a new cold war strategy along with the fake collapse of soviet union. read gen ivashov

[hablerz]

@mikefan09 The cold war was fake in of itself , it was propagated to keep both sides buying arms and to provide an enemy for the US government. This guy is a fake if you ask me.

[mikefan09]

@hablerz theres clearly a russian angle, hes still working for gru or kgb i think, hes argument holds water i believe because it would certainly make the demolition easier, conventionals could do it but this guarantees the full elimination of the tower and makes clean up so much easier, conventionals couldnt turn the building into dust. if u look at the videos of the tower before collapse, i notice a sort of shudder in the tower, then it collapses, i think thats the blast wave.

[TheGralswaechter]

Follow the evidences by watching all parts und you willl see that Dimitri Khalezzov is right! A lot of absolutely serios and scientific informations, I think! Take a big step back and see the whole and entire picture! Ok, maybe he doesn´t mentioned a view political backgrounds... and failed in any detail, but all in all the theory of a "nuclear contolled demolition" of the WTC seems logical!

[hablerz]

@TheGralswaechter The idea that the Russians did 911 is just ridiculous to me.

[iceisnice61]

Hey its back, YT has been yanking it for the longest time, wonder why? "buzz'? When I originally saw it when first posted, I thought 'there is something to this", and does explain ALOT (like what happened to most of the interior of the buildings) but Gen. Khalezov, for me, reeks of "Intel Mindfuck". But he more I see and think about it, the more it makes sense. Saving certain "stuctures" (rail) would be no problem, and would have be considered in the design phase.

This ones crazy.

[neckhardt]

The camera was a lot more than a "few meters" away from the bomb, and if there was truly an nuclear explosion under the twin towers, the bottom floors would have collapsed first due to the pressure and heat and collapsed from the bottom, not from the top.

If the camera was truly a "few meters" from the building, you would only be able to see one window, not the top 10-20 stories of the building.

[neckhardt]

I call BS on this one. In the video when the building "shakes" (about 5:49 in) the smoke shakes too. This would not happen in the real world. This video looks manufactured to me.

[mjeramusicpro]

@neckhardt This is a normal camera shake when the bomb exploded a few meters from the camera.

[cassius969]

Path station which runs below the wtc would have been turned into plasma by an underground nuclear explosion, debunked.

[facebookprogrammer]

@cassius969 , but he explains that this is why they positioned the zero-box on the opposite sides of the buildings. Maybe you're right. I really wish more nuclear scientists would come out and put this to sleep for me. I'm no expert and many different theories seem to fit the scientific reason for the demolition of the towers, perhaps much of it is actual dis-info, unfortunately. One thing is for sure and that is that kerosene is out of the question and that is the most important thing to know.