Added: 5 years ago
From: obteene
Views: 397,381
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (310)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I know I shouldn't, but its so easy....Okay here I go.....Yourrrr Out!!!!!!!

  • @tendersl21, really.

  • He wanted to be just like bin laden

  • I’ve only been to one Major League Baseball game as an adult and that was a 2002 Texas Rangers @ Baltimore Orioles game. You can imagine, I never met Cory Fulton Lidle(555-15-8840)or his flight instructor, Tyler STANGer (607-09-2700), who were both killed 10/11/06 when their small plane flew into a New York City highrise. Nevertheless, at :09, the building they flew into shows tiered architecture resembling a staircase. Unrelated: watch?v=YsJyfJ0b-WA or Elnora Whitaker (223-03-5423)dying 8/15/88

  • how come the building didn't collapse?

  • 10/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, IT WAS AN UNMANNED DRONE PLANE, THE TRUTH FOLKS!

  • @Dekabricks dumbass it was a yankee pitcher who crashed his plane in the building he was drunk or something. you're a fucking nut.

  • @67tr876

    Actually he wasn't drunk.

  • 1) ow

    2) omg ufo on the left from 0:04 0;13

  • Any video depicting a plane crash = 9/11 arguments.

  • he probably didn't want to pay the IRS.

  • Not even a fireman like Mariano Rivera could help with that.

  • osama is going cheap now?

  • wow al qeada really hates skyscrapers so they blow them up with planes i bet the plane that crashed into the empire state building was also hjacked and was al qeada i will never spell there name with a capital A

  • @soldier2975: Apparently you will never spell "their" properly either.

  • @XSDarkMoonZX their

  • @soldier2975

    a plane crashed into the empire state?

  • @oto24680 i learned it was not al qeada and it was just an accident during WW1 or WW2 a plane going over seas didnt get high enough and it couldnt slow down to pull up and crashed

  • @soldier2975

    Oh wasnt that in 1945 WWII?

  • @oto24680 i dont know but i think it was around that time

  • I suppose Bush was responsible for this, too? Lol, truthers make me laugh. XD

  • @hotdogman67 no, a dumb, dumbass and his dumbass flight instructor are responsible for this.

  • Cory Lidle plane crash into NY skyscraper.

    I like how it clearly says on the bottom "Plane crashes into Manhattan skyscraper.

  • it was an attack by creatonist radicals but your government tells you lies about an accident or something

  • watch the movie "remember me" fucking sad...wont spoil it but it goes with ths\is

  • @xXCoBH8CreWXx the ending was so sad. :(

  • inside job lol

  • not cool.

  • more like demograph apathy of the usa ..not exclusive to utube ..donno what thorazine is & it does stand to reason the drug infested would be those who are privy to things such as ..so u lay back into yer apathy while i look forward to the day of horror on the faces especially to those who rendered themself vulnerable by scattering their larvae. okie doke..alrighty then , bye now & thanx for sharpenin the validity of the point i praddled on about mr example ..& i hate THEE best ..always.

  • 100th rator!!!!!

  • thats wat we call 9/11

  • what happened to that last cmmt..the 2nd sentence has outta place or 4 extra letters at the begginning..? just wanted to let whom-ever may read to know i was aware of that ..left it posted without correction cause its readable ..

  • Well, after your four paragraph tirade here, we are all set straight now, and we have you to thank for it. Congratulations. Now take your Thorazine, and go back to bed. No one cares about any point you have to make. Welcome to the apathy of Youtube!

  • oh and god-double-damned righto..foe show ..<--i come up with those and watch them manifest on tv and the web ...i am the original trapped in this blood sack bone frame torsoe walkin round with provoked rash thoughts ..least i can admit this most are in denial of. huh..duhhherr whaaa? sleepytown i am gone once again

     depending ... baitin - waitin

  • at least the spoken word will be something as reality "becomes" onbe all thats left ly then..the last laugh will have to be sufficient. watch the denial morons freek out silently..no-where to be found commenting so bodly on youtube etc... wheeeew..well, theres my 3 "red negative mark comments" if'n there allowed to remain visible. well, dec 25th 09 doin the family thing..online saw this & unloaded some stress...buh bye,,,taanx for the vid.

  • by now most shouldve heard the questions posed ..looked into it ..been suckered by the alex jones disinfo artists scattered about, jews, zionists, freemasons etc...finally snapping from that waking slumber finally digging to the vatican infiltration & why kenned was hushed ..being versed on the jesuits & 2-300 yr durations of plans carried out ultimately to manifest to some twisted unioned world order ..& when the "smarties" finally see it'll be ..well it was gonna happen either way..hu! gosh!

  • ive read a bit of comments below ..& it seems there are still people out there who {when hearing the 911 spill - in this present climate} reluctant to be concerned..especially with the seeming caliber of responses in support of those "attacks ,,ive never witnessed this level of apathy . guess there were people even an hour after the titanic was sinkin ..water splashin on there shoes who order another drink & request a song from the band "the bands still playing..my drink is cold" idiots!

  • Bush was behind it. I just know it. I even bet it was a hologram plane!

  • shut up

  • DEMO DEMO DEMOLITION !

  • you're responsible for it as well as bush and you again. that kind of thinking caused HUGE problems you shouldn't be so blind to history.

  • Racist

  • No, they are responsible for corned beef and pastrami. You should thank them, you little cocksucker.

  • i'd bet people was thinking oh shit another attack.

  • "what does 'conservation of momentum' have to do with anything?"

    let me jog your crippled memory

    " the weight of falling slabs successively falling on the slabs below"

    If you need further explanation, find it somewhere else.

    Your didactic approach doesn't work on me. I've the sophists, written numerous papers on the rhetoric and it's use in modern society.

    In other words, your shit don't work anymore.

    Or maybe your just to fucking dumb to know what you're doing.

    I'm not.

  • So what does 'conservation of momentum' have to do with disproving the 'falling slab theory'. If you don't understand the Physics you shouldn't band the termology about.

    Didactic??? Is this your new favourite word?

    And WTF are the Sophists??

  • "If you don't understand the Physics"

    If I didn't understand it, how would I know about the 2nd law of Newtonian physics?

    Good job sport.

    I quite clearly understand what I'm speaking of.

    Didactic? Guess you don't what that emans huh? Well it perfectly describes your entry above.

    Sophists? It's called a dictionary, look it up.

    Though I'll give you a hint, it's where the term "sophisticated" comes from and it concerns rhetoric.

    LOL

  • Anyway, enlighten us with your theory of why the towers fell down?

  • I don't have one.

    Why, should I?

    Better yet, why should I?

    Quit trying to build a strawman argument just to attack me ad hominem, it get's really fucking tedious fending of your ilk here.

    So nothing else about "falling slabs"? Please, I'd be more than glad to debate your defense of this theory.

    I thought you and your profession had it all sussed out? AM I wrong?

  • Everyone knows who they are, who at least have a graduation...

  • "who at least have a graduation"

    Learn the language before you attempt to criticize somone else's education.

    Why would 99.9% of people know, or even care, about ancient Greek Philosophy.

  • Comment removed

  • i feel bad for the flight instructor who goes "unnamed" in the video's description. goes down in a plane crash in which he was trained to fly planes and isnt even remembered. RIP unnamed flight instructor.

  • even the smallest crash is tragic,

    its sad these things happen.

  • aside from a few experts with some wacky ideas, almost ALL of us in the design, architecture, engineering and construction fields understood immediately why the towers collapsed after being struck. It has to do with the tensile strength of steel under extreme heat, the weight of falling slabs successively falling on the slabs below and the design of a building designed to absorb the punturing impact of a relatively smaller, lighter aircraft but not the fully fueled impact of a jumbo jet.

  • How incredibly didactic and transparent.

    All you say? How would you know? Did you poll every "expert" in the fields of design, architecture, engineering and construction to come to this conclusion?

    If not, what was the size of your sample group?

    Or are you just assuming.

    "the tensile strength of steel under extreme heat,"

    So your idea of extreme heat would be an office fire for less than an hour?

    "falling slabs successively falling on the slabs below "

    Conservation of momentum anyone?

  • You call 50 000 litres of burning jet fuel an 'office fire'...Get real you WUM.

    Conservation of momentum???? What's 2nd grade physics got to do with anything?

  • Which tower was that? The first hit or second?

    How long does it take to burn of aspirated kerosene? Minutes my friend, as in 5-10. Or are you infereing that the entire inside of BOTH towers were raging infernos from impact to collpase?

    And it was fueled by jet fuel?

    LOL

    As to 2nd grade physics, I wasn't aware that the laws of Newtonian Laws of Motion could be divided up for use in different grades.

    Are there different laws in University?

    LOL

    It appplies, as do the 1rst and 3rd law.

    LOL

  • Who cares which tower. Both were hit by big planes with lots of fuel on board, travelling at high speeds. The results are the same.

    Who cares how long it takes the fuel to burn. Why don't you calculate the total energy contained within 50 Tons of jet fuel. While you're at it, you can use your extensive knowledge of Physics to calculate the Kinetic energies of the planes as they hit the Towers.

    And what does 'conservation of momentum' have to do with anything?

  • Um, who cares? The second tower hit was the first to fall. It was also the one with the least amount of fuel in it. Recall that the vast majority burned off outside the building on impact. It also was the one where there was the least amount of damage to the core.

    Now how does that one fail first?

    And it matters how long fuel burns, becuase your asumption is, it was a blast furnace inside. Kerosene has a fairly quick burn rate, as compared to gasoline or say deisel.

    read my next entry;

  • "Recall that the vast majority burned off outside the building on impact. It also was the one where there was the least amount of damage to the core."

    How incredibly didactic and transparent.

    How would you know? Did you poll every "expert" in the fields of design, architecture, engineering and construction to come to this conclusion?

    If not, what was the size of your sample group?

    Or are you just WUMMING.

  • No asswipe, like the rest of the world, I watched it happen live.

    Apparently you know nothing about rhetoric, it's use or it's history and you look like a fool ttrying to turn this around on me, mainly becuase there are no grounds.

    Where's the rhetoric in my statement? there isn't any.

    Yours?

    "almost ALL of us in the design, architecture, engineering and construction fields"

    Rhetoric, pure and simple.

    You want me to point out the rest of your fallacies?

  • "asswipe", "LOL"

    You should stick to using words like these as I'm pretty sure you understand what they mean. Leave the big words and scientific theory to the big boys who actually know what they mean.

  • Oh, so from watching on TV you KNOW that most of the jet fuel burned off outside of the buildings, and the extent of the damage to the towers cores.

    WOW.....chump.

  • WTC was designed to sustain many plane impacts as described by the designer

  • The towers were designed to withstand a hit from a 707 at 250 MPH, not a 737/767 at 500+ MPH.

  • Do you think, say 100 floors down the core melted there. I dont

  • Not from the impact. The lower floors collapsed because of the floors above collapsing onto them. Internal fires in the rubble could then have melted steel etc.

    If the planes had hit the top of the Towers then I doubt they'd have fallen.

  • Conspiracy majority verdict

  • Conspiracy...lol

    Next thing you'll be telling me the X-Files were real.

  • Ok, now put your head back in the sand

  • Ok Mulder.

  • Do you think i give a shit if the us government wants to kill its own, because alot of americans dont

  • "The US government wants to kill its own"???? What are you talking about?

  • Who cares, piss off

  • You piss off.

    This is a genuine video, not a hang out place for conspiracy nuts to post thier rubbish.

  • You piss off.

    This is a genuine video, not a hang out place for conspiracy nuts to post thier rubbish

    ok the towers fell at free fall speed???why did they not tip over if the planes hit them??? and the fact that NORAD didn't shoot those planes down.NORAD makes interceptions in less than 10 minutes,4 planes should have been shot down that day,but you can go ahead and try to argue with that.

  • the buildings didnt fall over because of the support beams that failed overloaded the rest of the beans, causeing it to fall straight down. And if you notice as the buildings fell, thaey leaned towards teh impact zone. And NORAD has a BIG decision on whether to kill hundreds of lives

  • 1) i am engineer and actually qualified

    2) the plane was less than 10min from the a major airport so it wasn't seen as a threat

    3) you are an idiot

    4) if you knew anything about structural mechanics (too much to teach an idiot) you would know exactly what happened in the structure

    5) if you think they should fall over from a plane hitting them you should realize the wind sheer forces exerted on an area that large are much bigger than anything the plane could have done..ITS CALLED ENGINEERING

  • hmm i really don't see the buildings falling over from 2 planes hitting them OR falling into it self....but you can go ahead and keep lieing to ur self,and about how your "qualified" and your 5 points to counter what i said just makes you look like a 12 year old with acne

  • you have that backwards....If you put a 10 pound weight on your head, you would be fine. If I drop that same 10 lbs from 30 ft over your head you would fall to the ground and possibly die. This is exactly why the towers fell. It is the difference between a STATIC and DYNAMIC load. You are an idiot, you are getting your reasoning from a movie that was made as a joke.

  • @mcpeepson

    Failed.

  • @mcpeepson

    That's your problem.

  • lol

  • @SucceedsAtWill you go tell him man~

  • @SucceedsAtWill It's wind shear, not "sheer."  You're a structural engineer? Jeez.

  • Comment removed

  • @SucceedsAtWill You obviously shouldn't build ANYTHING in your life!

  • @SucceedsAtWill SucceeedsAtWill's account has been terminated due to repeated or severe violations of youtubes Community Guidelines and/or claims of copyright infringement. So, how could he get to be one of the top comments for this video?

  • @SucceedsAtWill you my friend are a badass

  • "Internal fires in the rubble could "

    So not did, but could?

    Conversly, they could not have melted the steel, and based on the information available, probably didn't. Unless those building became the worlds largest blast furnaces.

    As to the "Pancaking" you describe, FEMA and NIST have both rejected that explanation. There is no basis for it.

    You're obviously not familiar with the design of those towers.

    Falling "floor slabs" aren't possible. Check the blue prints, or construction photos.

  • So tell me what did 'melt' the steel, and why the Towers really fell.

  • Yes it is simple. The building didn't go down because it didn't have explosives planted in it like the twin towers.

  • You're a dumb fuck, how's that for simple?

  • Yeh you're pretty simple alright. Another brave youtuber behind his keyboard who no damn clue about anything, so he has to talk shit to try to make himself feel big and impress other dumbasses like himself. When you actually get something intelligent to say, then make a comment. Til then stop wasting people's time talking out of your ass.

  • Lol you are comparing this to 9/11 and asking why didnt the building go down? Simple to me:

    The planes were bigger, faster, and had more fuel.

    Also, because WTC towers were very high their center of gravity was very weak, which means that they were fragile

  • Also there were explosives rigged from what I heard and read

  • @LordParkour

    Actually no.

  • people thought this was another 9/11. my dad was in NYC when it happend. he said that all Manhattan was silent. it was wicked wicked uiet.

  • hmmmm i do wonder...

  • Hmm, maybe because this tiny little heli that can barely carry 4 people and a fraction of the weight of a commercial jet simply bounced off the building like a fly being swatted off your abnormally large, neanderthal forehead? Seriously, go get some common sense. Or stop trolling the interwebs. There are better things to do with your life.

  • Yes it is simple. The building didn't go down because it didn't have explosives planted in it like the twin towers.

    WTC was designed to sustain many plane impacts as described by the designer

  • Damn, what a way to go! Terrible. How can that happen? Must have been careless and inexperienced or something. Unfortunate.

  • the WTC shouldnt have collapsed in the first place..especialy not the way it did..yes..im one on them -.-

  • don't worry, your not alone, im one of them too...

  • mee too

  • Same ... :(

  • Idiots...

  • lol, did you honestly believe me?

  • Its like hey were playing 'Cause you had a bady day' in the radio

  • how come that building did not crumble like the twin towers? hmmmm

  • The plane's a Cirrus, not a Boeing.

  • Yesterday I saw a bird slam into a building and the building did not crumble like the twin towers. Hmmmmmm...

  • For one, the plane that downed the towers were a hell of a lot bigger

  • And goin a HELL of alot faster.

  • And had a lot more fuel.

  • why cant they fly into their own fucking buildings

  • And I bet that building didn't collapse.

  • ...

  • if i was pres id fucking atomic bomb there ass...

  • his control of a plane was just as bas as the control of his fastball

  • what....dont say that ur just jelus ive bet u never even meet him and today is a very sad day for mi fam cuz cory lidle died 2 years ago today and 1-3 oclock and mostly becuz were sad is...he WAS in my family

  • nah we got God

  • RIP Cory Lidle

  • oh go shuv it up your cunt u bastard!

  • Tyler Chase Stanger was the the flight instructor of the New York plane crash with Cory Lidle.

    It deeply dissappointed me when I typed in "Cory Lidle" and hundreds of tribute dedication videos came up. Yet when I typed in "Tyler Stanger", my search beared no results. :(

    Tyler Stanger was my sisters husband. please watch his tribute video.

    watch?v=OYPDhQfdPZQ

  • no...

  • no, just no. Go die somewhere.

  • I was being sarcastic you assholes. It's the very same logic conspiracy theorists use.

  • or maybe ur just a dumbass

  • Have A Nice Day! :)

  • I believe I was joking. You're the dumbass for not noticing the blatant use of sarcasm in my comment. Could you please go back to watching SpongeBob?

  • i beleive you are the biggest retard on earth.

  • How so? Your comebacks are retarded.

  • go cry to your mom oh and tell her thanks for last night.

  • How old are you? I don't need your juvenile, grade school rhetoric.

  • ok im sorry i was having a bad week. we cool now?

  • i fucking love spongebob, asshole.

  • I do too.

  • hell yeah son.

  • wow. I've never seen this video.

  • was lidle a muslim?

  • And I bet that building didn't collapse.

  • of course the building didnt collapse it was only a cessna.... i think haha i was home sick when this happened so i watched it all day long, got boring tho meh

  • wasnt a cessna, it was a cirrus.

  • haha beerad i love where your getting too :) investigate 9/11 !

  • Meh. No. I was in a bad mood. O-o

    Anyway, someone below was saying that the explosion was a bomb. Dunno how it turned out as a normal comment. Oh well.

  • lol get fcking nre camrea and make itmore realistic

  • yankees rock

  • GO RED SOXS!!! no just kidd'n

  • All around a ridiculous idea. RIP and all but damn that was stupid.

  • he was in a no fly zone.... he was stupid to be flying there....

  • Dude, I hate the Yankees too, but this is not the place for comments like that.

  • I didn't mean it like that. I have nothing against Cory.

  • oi shut it, the lot of ye!!

  • Comment removed

  • Giving your extremely harsh comments I'd really love to hear your theories.

    Of course, once you've calmed down.

  • Comment removed

  • Unlike you I keep my opinions to myself. And I don't believe in aliens or any other invasion by other beings, although I do like the Alien vs Predator movies, escapism and all that.

    I don't care what happened at 9/11, I think it is sad for those involved. That's all. I await your next friendly comment, you're swell!!!

  • Comment removed

  • I gave you my opinion? 'it's sad' isn't much of an opinion, last time I checked it was a feeling.

    I actually like to use the Turkey foil as It has more yardage, makes a much bigger hat protecting me from much bigger forces, should It not get zapped in an attack I can still use it at Xmas on my roast. Think James Bond was a bit jealous of it, has Q working on a travel version that he an pull out from the back of his watch.

    "lol" How old are you? 10.

  • Comment removed

  • I said "I AGREE WITH MOST OF THE COMMENTS HERE" meaning here, this video you incompetent child.The quotes about the steel structure etc. Now you're boring me."I think" is more commonly used than you are daily.Get over yourself.And you're right,I'm commenting on behalf of the marketing team.Are you reading what you're writing you fool?

    2 attempts at a reply and that's the best you can come up with?You should be embarrassed.

  • Comment removed

  • This isn't even worthy and even you know that. I thought I had a player on my hands, obviously not. GO play with your scalextric. How come you have so much time on your hands? Should you be gluing little soldiers together. Geek.

  • Comment removed