Tragic Lies in Earth Science Class

[Neosaigo]

The whole idea of Christian school make me cringe.

I hope they are teaching the proper sciences at least.

"Mitochondria have DNA, science said it was parasite in evolutionary symbiosis, but the answer is God made them." O.O

I hope the moderate Christians have some sensibility to not bring ignorance into school. I know there are all types, but since it is the same religion, it is sometimes worrying.

[HimesInu]

@Neosaigo Some are, others aren't. It depends on where they are in the country.

[iamnotatroll1]

Its because of 6th graders like this who are still in earth science who make athiests look stupid

[anthonymagnuson]

there might be some holes in evolution but 99.99 percent of evolution is proven fact that we did evolve from monkeys and aps... im just wondering but the hubble telescope has found more evedence of the big bang then we have that god created humans. if someone can prove to me that god exiset and he did create us 20000 some years ago plz. message me back comment on this... and p.s. sorry for bad spelling

[lolastarsandstripes]

@anthonymagnuson if i'm not wrong, we haven't evolved from apes, but apes and humans (well homo erectus) have a common ancestor....

[njlachap]

@lolastarsandstripes - actually, modern non-human apes and modern humans are all apes, as are our common ancestors.

[SevenRiderAirForce]

Lol Noah's Flood's on.

Damn, it's a rerun.

[landerik22]

I can't believe that they would teach you that in school. Wow.. I am so sorry you have to be educated by people who do not understand science. You seem like a smart kid (although very cocky) and really should have the best education you can.

[DanjoFox]

Sir, you are really smart. A credit to logic lovers everywhere. But you would do yourself and our cause a favor by cutting the cockyness. It's a bit ugly, and un-necessary. Our arguments are strong and our science is tight enough to float without the sarcasm and theatrics. Otherwise, I applaud you and your series of videos! Keep up the good work!

[chosen1atWork]

you say religion is dangerous because of the radicals that kill.. what about the nuts evolution spawns who murder far more than any religion ever thought of doing? Stalin murdered more than the Catholic church did in 1200 years.

[grengd]

Good lad  !!!!!!!

[squirleboy]

just a nut case you dont have aclue, and you have given way to the illushion of science.

[KackeEssender]

big opfer noob

[Utgardchaos]

this is just stupid, you make americans look bad.

oh forgot only 1 of 10 americans are ateists.

maybe thats because there where only low lives and criminals who moved to america?

or maybe its because the iq level in america is about 80 according to tests?

[Utgardchaos]

dinosaurs and humans have never lived togheter, those footprints of dinosaurs where a lot older

[Utgardchaos]

is this a joke?

[TheAmazingCristian]

Oh My Gosh, Kent Hovind really thinks Maths is a religion, I thought that comment on your channel was just a joke.

[robbob1508]

Shahfilms, pascals wager has WAY more holes then evolution

[Shahfilms]

I actually spend my days hanging out with friends, playing sports, and other things involving a social life, how about you?

[Shahfilms]

I don't get you at all kid. Kent Hovind has his theories, and YOU HAVE YOURS. If you have to hate him for having his opinions your just a hypocrite. You respond to videos like you are a god or something. You also think that evolution is some kind of perfect event that causes all organisms to become perfect creatures. Evolution should be your god.

[ATL45]

kent hovind has opinions which are not supported by evidence and data. that's not inherently a problem, but he teaches his ideas like they are SCIENCE and claims EVOLUTION is the real religion.

evolution is a theory of change. there is nothing that mandates "improvement" or a direction towards "perfection".

[Kabane52]

Wtf was that? Kent actively mocks and argues against evolutionists! We defend ourselves. And you don't understand evolution.

[Shahfilms]

You only think you understand it! Who cares if you can go to talk orgins for 5 hours a day. The truth is no one knows for sure. The amount of pride you get in trying to defend evolution is probably mind blowing.

[Cantab3141592654]

And how much pride do you get hiding from real science behind the easy answers of creationism?

[Shahfilms]

I dont hide behind real science. Evolution is not a proven fact, and even Kabane has to admit there are some wide holes in the theory of evolution.

[smgharsha2110]

There are no holes in the theory of evolution. That is there has no evidence that has been found that contradicts evolution. ALL other sciences that have nothing to do with biology also support evolution. Evoluion has been proven over and over again.

[Kabane52]

I'm sure you would love to have a stickam debate with me on the topic, no?

[Shahfilms]

Kid you think your a christian, and its completely pathetic. You defend swearing, you say evangelism needs to be altered, you say we shouldn't act like god loves us, and you believe in evolution, which is not a fact and does not fit at all into what christianity is based on. How many videos have you made defending something about christianity or christianity itself...? You must just love acting like an 8th grade Michael Shermer.

[rockandrock44]

Shahfilms, get an education and learn what proof scientists have for evolution. It is just as much a fact as gravity and atomic theory. Actually learn about the subject, or don't post at all. Ignorance is not an excuse during intellectual discussion.

The Bible does not go against evolution, just your narrow minded interpretation of the Bible.

[Shahfilms]

Wow, I know exactly how the theory of evolution works. Natural selection and "beneficial mutations" allow the organism to change over time you idiot. Considering evolutionists can't even give a rock hard example of a beneficial mutation. Evolution does not fit into the bible, IT SAYS THE EXACT OPPOSITE.

[rockandrock44]

Alright then, tell me, how do bacteria all of a sudden begin eating nylon? Nylon has only been around for about 100 years. Did God give them the information to eat it 6000 years ago? It occured via a beneficial mutation.

The Bible says nothing about how we were created, you idiot. It says God created the heavens and the earth. Show me the verse where it states we got poofed here. You can't.

Get an education. There is to much ignorance in the world.

[rockandrock44]

Shawfilms, search for AronRa's video series called "Foundational Falsehoods of Creationism". They are very good and completley destroy the creationist viewpoint.

It would give you more information than what I could say in 500 words.

[Shahfilms]

How is that a beneficial mutation?

GENESIS 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

Sure sounds like god used evolution! A cell somehow formed out of a primordial soup, that cell evolved and through billions of years of death, suffering, and disease humans miraclously evolved from a unicellular organism. YEP SURE SOUNDS LIKE A POWERFUL GOD! HE CAN SIT BACK AND WATCH THE EVOLUTION SHOW!

[rockandrock44]

Because it allows the bacteria to adapt to an envrionment and eat something that is abundent in the area. Did I really have to explain that to you?

Please look up the word create, and tell me where it says anything about poofing into existence. By the way, if God is not powerful by waiting millions of years for creation, why didn't we do it in six seconds and not six days? Why did he have to wait a week? He must not have been very powerful. Bad logic.

[Shahfilms]

Bad Logic??? Lets see 6 days or 14 billion years???? I'll take the 6 days.

[rockandrock44]

Why not six seconds? Or one second? Is God less powerful because he did not make is in one second? Of Course not.

So, what says he is less powerful just because he makes life gradually?

There is evidence from tons of different sources that show the universe to be older than 6000 years old. If Evolution is wrong, than God is a deciever. Right, the fossil record and genetics are hear just to test our faith and have us believe in Satan and his 'evil' theory? That's rediculous.

[rockandrock44]

And I know you will reject all the evidence for it. Because even if we were to show 110% that evolution is true, even then you would cover your ears and scream "NO, NO! I believe God poofed things and thats that!"

That is besides the fact that if Creationism were right, then we can toss out all of biology, geology, paleontology, physics (radiometric dating), ecosystem dynamics, astronomy, relativity, and alot more. Most likely 80% of modern science that has put Man into the 21st century.

[Shahfilms]

Why do you need a God if we can get here without him???????? All of the evidence does not point towards evolution, answersingenesis is a great sight, check it out.

[rockandrock44]

I never said God did not play a part in evolution, and I don't think we could be here without him. I'm sorry, 99% of evidence, minus the stuff that Creationists either misrepresent or make up all together. (Paluxy River Tracks, anyone?)

Answers in Genesis rejects most modern science, the same thing that got man out of the dark ages. See my above post.

[Shahfilms]

Hey if you ever just wanna talk a bit add me..

MSN=aj_golf_3001@hotmail . com

Aim=Ajohns90

[jraehennes]

If Creationism were right we would not toss out 80% of modern science. Science supports the bible and Creationism. The bible has yet to be disproved.

[charleshasideas]

Noah's ark has been disproved. You cannot fit the millions of species of animals that live on land onto a boat of that size. Also even by today's standards, building a boat of that size and making it out of wood is near impossible. the wood just cannot support itself on that scale and the boat would leak and then sink. That is just one of the stories that the bible has been proved wrong on.

[gorilla199uncensored]

DNA also proves no ark.

and HISTORY, The egyptians for one where at the hight beuilding pyramids during the non existant flood.

World is not flat or the center of the universe or 6000 eyars old.

Bible wrong, its a fail on science!

[Shahfilms]

The fossil record only proves that there is a tremondous lack in transitional forms, it also points to an explosion of complex organisms at the same time period.

[rockandrock44]

There are thousands of transitionals. First, you need to learn how fossils form and understand that not everything that dies becomes fossilized. Only seven full T Rex fossils have been found in the whole world.

Next, even if we had millions, Creationists would still demand more and dismiss all evidence just because they don't want to see the truth.

[Shahfilms]

Dude, it's not my priority to dismiss evidence. I have come to the conclusion that evolution is a good theory, but there are some holes in it. I would rather believe in creationism and be wrong than believe in evolution and be wrong.

[rockandrock44]

Just want to ask, what are the holes that you see in evolution that make you want to believe in Creationism?

Creationism has no scientific evidence for it, so I don't see how you could think scientifically, Creationism would be a better theory.

[jraehennes]

The theory of evolution is not dangerous because it undermines God's power. It is dangerous because it removes most peoples belief in God altogether.

[charleshasideas]

religion is dangerous because it creates radicals that are willing to kill for their god or because religion slows down the pregression of intelligence in the human species

[gorilla199uncensored]

good point!

the thing is evolution is a reality, so it proves the bible a joke alone, let alone all the mistakes in the bible that have been proven false!

So reality wins and bible losses.

If people want to real and accept the truth let them, no point having basless belief in somthing that not true (religion)

[grengd]

so what.

[rockandrock44]

And since when is animal death ever mentioned in the Bible as evil? That's complete speculation and is a very narrow interpretation fo the world.

It's a fallacy to say that just because you don't understand how something happened that means it did not. Let's say I don't understand how exactly a phone works. Does that mean it does not work? Bad Logic.

[rockandrock44]

The Bible states nothing on how we were created. Just that we were.

Evolution is actually a great natural concept that allows life to diversify and survive in even the harshest of situations. If God used evolution, than it just shows how he can create an advanced system to create life on earth. Death is simply the end of life. Big deal. Animal death is not evil. For every animal death there is a new life. If you knew anything about an ecosystem you would know that.

[Shahfilms]

Ok, yep and once humans finally had been created from evolution god pushed a button to give us souls and everlasting life. Is that a good argument? And what species were judged? Just modern day humans?

[rockandrock44]

Who says thats not what he did? Is there anything in the Bible other than a narrow interpretaion of Genesis that contradicts it?

Science has evidence that humans evolved, and the bible does not contradict it, so what is the problem?

[jraehennes]

How can you say that the bible does not contradict evolution?

[Shahfilms]

Primitive humans would have gone through that to smart one.

[jraehennes]

Genesis 1:26-28. How did God give man dominion over the fish and birds if he evolved over millions of years? Did He create us in his image as single celled organisms?

[Rubacant]

@jraehennes You are Right. Ya! Go in the woods and tell a Brown Bear you have dominion over him. See what happens.

[rockandrock44]

Is that because we never saw a single celled organism become a human?

Reality check, we don't have to see things directly to know it happens or that it is there. No one has seen an atom, but it seems that you probably don't have a problem with it. Or do you? Are we made of Jesustrons?

Jesustrons are just as absurd as Creationism.

[SevenRiderAirForce]

@Shahfilms

Evolution is a fact. You're entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts. Sorry to have to peg you on that one.

[h8uall66]

Go to the library Shahfilms. Seriously, go to the library.

[dlepz]

I'm sorry but you aren't smart enough to be an atheist because you're 12 years old

also enjoy hell lol

[Nightbane12]

What?

[Hez1337]

What a crackpot school... unbelievable.

[Desertphile]

Certainly you are well to complain about what the teacher had presented.... but, you also said you go to a "Christian school." Shouldn't you therefore expect to be lied to and deceived by people who have a theological agenda to further? Seriously, how could you have expected better?

[HumbleYankee]

If we find life on other planets, I wonder if Kent Hovind will wanna preach Christianity to them, too. Lol, watch him get blown to pieces!

[HumbleYankee]

The core of the Earth is Hell!  According to SOME people! LMFAO!

[XGralgrathor]

Perhaps historians research historical documents because to know our past is to understand ourselves?

[messiahjonz]

Tommy, why would your parents pay for this "education" you are getting? Their fault, no one elses.

[jergsden]

"How's Tommy going to deal with this one"? They don't realize who they're up against! ;)

[XGralgrathor]

To find out what they can about historical events and life in historical times. Mind you, they do *not* do this by just reading the historical text and assuming anything it says to be true. They actually have to have a lot of knowledge, expertise and do a lot of work to tease some information out of a historical source. That's why it's a science, and not a hobby.

[thrufaithalone]

XGralgrathor-Have you checked out the footbones of A afarensis to see what kind of print it would have made?

[XGralgrathor]

I haven't. other people have. I read here that they aren't sure whether A. afarensis could have made the distinctive arch.

[thrufaithalone]

XGralgrathor-"I read here that they aren't sure whether A. afarensis could have made the distinctive arch"

I have read that as well.

[XGralgrathor]

Which leaves us with three options:

1. The prints were made by an known species of hominid, but we have insufficient information at this time to confirm this.

2. The prints were made by an as yet unknown species of hominid.

3. The dating was wrong, the prints are no more than 600.000 years old, and the prints belong to a species of the genus Homo.

[XGralgrathor]

There is no need to "believe" historical texts. Historians do not "believe" historical texts: they research them, find out what they mean, place them in context.

[boardsnow44]

it's funny watching somsone so ignorant thinking they are so smart.

[eric712]

Mathematics is a religion?

[darris321]

i think your voice is getting deeper. Is it creepy to tell you that? lol

[RustyAHole]

Kabane you OWN.. too bad you dont go to a public school. you would be a hit the teachers would LOVE you.

[skaterasshole1234567]

you told me about this on aim!

[migkillertwo]

they're 3 fucking feet long

[PacERs143]

are you a freshman? cuz earth science is a freshman subject

[Kabane52]

Yes.

[EvanTheAgnostic]

you used so much double think man come on. You believe that the bible is just storys even though it does say that the earth has for corners and on 4 pillars but keep saying that Creationist are stupid but moderates are just as stupid atleast creationist actually believe what there god throws out

[aPaThEiSt]

Oh dear, DrDino.

Hahaha 'Evolutionary Philosophy'.

[Erech01]

lol, evolutionary philosophy,lol when i here idiots lke ken hamm and hovind say things like that, i need to sit downxD it stuns me to think that some people judge it asif its a philosophy, next thing you know....they will be calling quantum theory a philosophy

[DerivedApe]

Geology is not science?!?!

whahahaaaaaaat!?

[DerivedApe]

sheesh...I doubt Kent even knows the basics of dinosaurs. It seems like kent and aig like to use dinos to lure kids in to their fantasy land.

[nailo1]

hmm sounds like creatism is hitting close to home for you maybe my love for movies is to blame but an experienced personed may beable to turn this into a good movie though the heart of the conflict would prolly be overshadowed by movie makers love of CG

[UltimoJ]

I have a friend who's a creationist. Please educate him, because he doesn't deserve to suffer the mental illness called creationism.

[UltimoJ]

To call George Bush a Satan worshiper is an insult to actual Satanist.

[EtherealAntichrist]

Most Satanists do not in fact worship satan. We don't even believe in him.

[UltimoJ]

Yeah...that to.

[nonreligionist]

I'm sorry, I like you, but it's hilariously ironic for a Christian to call fellow Christians (fundie, but still Christian) delusional. You are right, they are delusional, but so are you if you continue to believe in Yahweh purly on faith. Take care.

[sighuponsigh]

Theres nothing delusional about that... Science = Study of the natural world. Science can make no comment on the supernatural. Kabane52 is against creationism.

[aPaThEiSt]

If science cannot make any comment on the supernatural, then you cannot prove supernatural events, which gives us no reason to believe they occur. Unless you had other types of evidence.

Supernatural events are rare, and non-existent.

[Kabane52]

We can use other methods other than science, such as history.

[Kabane52]

Delusional= Believing in something when you have clearly received evidence to the contrary.

My Christianity= Belief based on evidence. See my videos on the definition of faith at my other channel.

[thrufaithalone]

What about the Laetoli tracks? Why is it that the fossils of creatures that still exist today, are found, they identify them for what they are-squirrels, bats, crocodile, alligators, turtles, horseshoe crabs, horse hoofprints, etc, but when they come across what anyone would identify as a human footprint, they dismiss it because the age of the rock doesn't fit their hypothesis?

[michamus]

The Laetoli tracks are dated to have occurred 3.6myo. Hominids existed back then. In contrast, hominids did not exist at the time of dinosaurs. w w w . pbs . o r g / wgbh / evolution / library / 07 / 1 / l_071_03 . h t m l

[thrufaithalone]

You prove my point; the evidence (human footprints) is determined not to be human because it doesn't fit the idea that man didn't exist then; the evidence says they did; either your hypothesis is incorrect or the rock dating methods are inaccurate.

[XGralgrathor]

And because it *can* also be interpreted as something other than a human footprint, *and* because all other evidence points to the likelihood that it is indeed *not* a human footprint, **and** because it has been determined scientifically that it *is* indeed not a human footprint.

[thrufaithalone]

Sorry, let me clarify; "Hominids" apparently meaning not human.

[XGralgrathor]

Compared to the age of the footprints we're talking about, all hominids might be said to live in the same time frame.

[thrufaithalone]

My point is that if you can identify other creatures'footprints for what they are, why not human footprints? We know what they look like. Why make the exception when it comes to human footprints? Only because we assume we came from something else.

[thrufaithalone]

I need to say that I'm talking about the Laetoli prints which do indeed meet all the specifications for human prints.

[XGralgrathor]

Ah, the Laetoli prints. Waitup, I'm still out about those. They are likely hominid indeed.

[XGralgrathor]

Yes, they were in all likelihood hominid prints. However, there's no reason to assume that the makers of those prints were H. sap, as there were some hominid species at the time that could just as well have made the tracks. Indeed, more likely so, as the tracks indicate a length of about 1 m. in height.

[thrufaithalone]

I would say they are in all likelihood human footprints. There are also two sets side by side; one was probably a child. Those footprints meet all the specifications. We don't do that with horseshoe crab fossils, horse hoofprint fossils, or anything else that survives up to this day. We only do this with human footprints.

[XGralgrathor]

If you want to call all upright walking hominids humans, you can. It's not very scientific, but it's your show. Most people however would call the makers of said tracks Australopithecus afarensis. Hominid, but far from H. sap.

[thrufaithalone]

And you would assume it was Australopithecus afarensis because?

[XGralgrathor]

Because of nearby found evidence of populations of afarensis. And because the tracks showed evidence of being made by a being like afarensis.

[thrufaithalone]

You'd better double-check the "nearby" stats. And the tracks are indistinguishable from human footprints.

[XGralgrathor]

If I find 3 my old footprints which could have been made by humans and by A. afarensis, and I have evidence that H. sap. *didn't* exists 3 my ago, but A. afarensis *did* than I'll interpret nearby (say, within a range of 200 km) found fossils of A. afarensis as evidence that the tracks were made by A. afarensis.

[thrufaithalone]

XGralgrathor- you "know" humans didn't exist "3 million years ago" how? By what evidence? Age of the rock the print was in?

Did you google the images of these footprints and can you honestly say it looks any different than modern man's?

Also, does your proximity to a given footprint mean you made it?

[XGralgrathor]

By the ages of hominid fossils found around the globe. By the relation between these fossils and their contemporaries and precursors.

[thrufaithalone]

How do you determin the ages of the "hominid" fossils?

[XGralgrathor]

Usually, by the dating of the layers in which they were found.

[michamus]

In the Laetoli tracks there is no question that they are hominid tracks. On the river bed tracks there is also no question (within the scientific body) that these tracks found alongside dinosaur tracks, are indeed not hominid, let alone human. The weight distribution is wrong. The "foot prints" have the great toe on the outermost part of the foot print (think walking with your legs crossed). They are much larger than human footprints as well.

[thrufaithalone]

There is no question they are human footprints.

[michamus]

Do you not understand what a hominid is?

[thrufaithalone]

According to Webster's dictionary: "any of a family (Hominidae) of erect bipedal primate mammals comprising recent humans together with extinct ancestral and related forms"

I would add that when used in talking about fossil evidence it is often used to imply that the creature in referrence is something other than human.

[michamus]

"imply that the creature in referrence is something other than human."

ROFL! Nice try.

Pwned by your own definition.

[thrufaithalone]

michamus-let me clarify- when used in talking about fossil evidence, it is used - by evolutionists - to imply that the creature in referrence is something other than human.

[XGralgrathor]

Which all evidence does indeed imply. According to the accepted definition, A. afarensis was not human. Furthermore, we know that H. sap. did not exist at the time those tracks were made.

[thrufaithalone]

XGralgrathor-"Which all evidence does indeed imply."

You are disregarding the evidence (human footprints) in favor of an hypothesis. If you saw those prints on a beach or in your yard you would say they are human. Again I ask why is it we identify fossils of animals that survive until today for what they are but are in denial when faced with human footprints?

(A afarensis="Southern Ape" Ape footprints are quite different than human footprints.)

[XGralgrathor]

If I saw these prints on a beach, I would assume they were human because they were recent, and therefore it is possible they were made by humans.

If I find footprints made in a time before humans existed, I would not assume they were human, because that would be logically impossible.

If I then found evidence of a hominid species living nearby capable of making these tracks, I would then assume that they were responsible for making them.

[thrufaithalone]

XGralgrathor-which "hominid" are you referring to in this case? Lucy?

[XGralgrathor]

Australopithecus afarensis: An early australopithecine species that was bipedal; known fossils date between 3.6 and 2.9 mya (for example, Lucy).

The most extensive remains assigned to this species are found in Hadar, Ethiopia, including the famous "Lucy" partial skeleton and the "First Family" found at the A.L. 333 locality. Other localities bearing A. afarensis remains include Omo, Maka, Fejej and Belohdelie in Ethiopia, and Koobi Fora and Lothagam in Kenya.

[thrufaithalone]

XGralgrathor-when faced with hard evidence (human footprint) why do you not question the dating instead?

(If you leave your fingerprints at a given location and a crime takes place later, what is called into question is the time you were there.)

[XGralgrathor]

1. The age of the footprint would make me doubt 2 things: the dating, and the origin of the print.

2. Doubts about the dating could be resolved by independent dating by another party. All parties agree on an age of about 3.6 myo.

3. Doubts about the origin could be independently investigated. There is in all honesty some doubt as to whether A. afarensis or A. anamensis produced these tracks. Humans remain a logical impossibility.

[thrufaithalone]

XGralgrathor-all are not in agreement about the age. Since being uncovered, they have been eroding quickly; even with added protection from the elements. It raises the question as to how could they could have been there for 3.6 million years.

[XGralgrathor]

According to my information they had until recently been covered with volcanic material.

[VictorLaszloLives]

For an interpretation that you claim to be unquestionable, there certainly do seem to be many questions.

By the way, science never claims anything to be unquestionable.

[BryanAJParry]

WTF is up with schools in the US???

[iamaloserandisuck]

Kabane, you should shave your head. That would be soooooo cool.

[ren5311]

You are being cheated out of a proper education. I'd feel sorry for you, but you educate yourself. I feel sorry for your classmates.

But don't let it get to you. The frustration you feel is healthy: it's a natural response from a rational thinker confronted by irrationality. Use that energy to effect change.

[wikimon]

is your whole school against you?

[alexrulz911]

im so glad that i go to public school and im protected by seperation of church and state. if i had to learn about creation in school, id shoot myself in the head

[mikkeld]

Are most days in science class like this for you? I wonder if some of your teachers secretly, or not so secretly, dislike you for refuting or questioning what they say.

[randyhelzerman]

Doesn't your teacher know that Kent Hovind is, like, in jail for lying and stealing????

[XGralgrathor]

If Hovind had been a real scientist with actual valid points, stating that might be regarded as some kind of ad hominem or other logical fallacy.

I think it's safer just to point out why Hovind's claims are utter BS.

[randyhelzerman]

Hi XGraigrathor, you have a good point about the ad hominum thing. The reason I _ad_ed Hovind's _hominum_ was because the particular context---a teacher in a Bible school holding up Hovind as a role model--pointing him to a website of somebody who is, like in jail--is something which parents paying $25k a year for private school would tend to complain about.....seems like the teacher should avoid Hovind if only for ass-covering purposes...

[XGralgrathor]

Very true, and you are of course absolutely right, but it might not be construed as a particularly scientific way of reasoning ;)

[JackSpee]

you should use more sarcasm in your videos!

haha... It doesnt work when your talking to yourself

[chaunceyrodriguez]

you look like an acehole

[mormongod]

chaunceyrodriquez - you look like a peehole.

[cda6590]

If you had the choice, would you go to a public school instead of a Christian school that obviously has a bias towards creationism?

[GruntyAssassin]

Kabane, you are awesome. Have my babies. My girlfriend shouldn't mind.

[hanzo138]

Neptune and Pluto do not go around the sun, it is pure speculation because no one has ever witnessed a full rotation. Wow, that logic is retarded no matter how you look at it.

[FunkyJogaBonito]

Kabane, I admire you so much for your determination to understand the universe as it really is. I shouldn't really have to say that, obviously, but you are a shining light, not just to Christianity, but to all people, and of all world views, many of which do not face reality. There is far too much nonsense in the world today.

[SkepticalZombie]

Well said, kabane.

Sorry your teacher is such a douche -- but obviously there isn't much they can tell you which you already don't know.

[fershizzle01]

Is it possible to date tracks? Because maybe the tracks were made at different times. Did I say maybe? I meant definitely.

[KabaneTheChristian]

The tracks were found under a layer of rock that was ripped off by a very fast moving river. They were made at the same time, though they are both dinosaur tracks.

[skintightpotato]

Christian school or not, I can't believe they would actually be teaching Kent Hovind...

On another note, you are every teachers worst nightmare...lol!

[pyromania152]

I knew it would only be a matter of time before creationists started using that "mummified" dinosaur to support their insane assertions.

[kmc2525]

I am an agnostic and see the worlds scriptures--bible, Vedas, tao te ching, Quran etc as a source of ethics, morals and values, but I would not use their descriptions of the universe to plan a mission to Mars.

[Facecageworshipper]

Oh my. That is very unfortunate. You took the correct actions, spreading the knowledge of the fallacious nature of the site.

[hom3slicez]

lol@christian schools

[TheDude0fLife]

Tell your parents you need tyo attend a proper school. You're not being challenged enough. First!

[Kabane52]

Nah, I like the school in general. I like small schools, and it is very small, plus, these incidents are pretty uncommon.

[Hamandchees3]

Hi.