parameters to make it that short: low temp, near sea level field elevation ,headwind, low weight, full t/o thrust,and ofcourse the static t/o thrust he applied with brakes on, as shown by the nose oleo reaction....good practice
I lived in the white house just behind the winglet, so this is what I heard for many years. , But I love this ,take off , seem's so unreal , but probably empty, even though I have been told by it's pilot that they are very powerful.
It must have been completely empty - including fuel tanks! Skinny pilots, etc. Climb rate is amazing! What is it 20 degrees? 25?! Did he (she) land on the same runaway?! Because I would love to see that!!!!
Not only that I think there was heavy wind that helped built artificial airspeed. The camera clearly has wind hitting hte mic. If you look at the dirt from the back of the plane it seems to go away from the camera. When he takes off he tips his left wing up into the direction of the camera, where the wind would be from. There might be a slight headwind too. I think the main component of the wind is crosswind. Plane also may be little tail heavy at zcog. Plane front lifted easy...
The 75’ is an exceptional performance machine. In the 90’s, I regularly rode United’s 75’s in and out of Monterey CA. While runway 28L at 7600’ was enough for the lightly loaded old girl, I still remember the excitement of the Carmel visual. An approach off the Pacific, through a canyon, toward a close in mountain range, tight 180, and immediately on the deck. Plenty of go arounds and “terrain pull up” warnings. But, I always felt safe knowing the capabilities of this aircraft and crew.
I didn't recognize this at first because I only thought there was one airport near Reykjavik --- Keflavik.. and its out in the middle of nowhere, not near any buildings. I flew in there last year. I guess there is two?
@tchgeek20 When you fly with Icelandair, you land at Keflavík / BIKF. This was shot at Reykjavík / BIRK which is the domestic airport and located in downtown Reykjavík
2) It's LIGHTLY loaded (i.e. no pax and not a ton of fuel)
3) And yes, if there is any wind, it IS into the wind
As for Renton, I'll check with my uncle; he test flew for Boeing for 30 years, but I doubt they ever took a 757 out of there; not that it couldn't, I just don't think they ever did.
@clovis86 - Ahhh...I thought only the 737s were made at Renton. Thanks for catching this.
Something truly remarkable my Uncle told me. I asked him, "How quickly could you stop a 757 on landing?" His reply, "Lightly loaded with full autobrake....touchdown to full-stop about 5-7 seconds, but, everyone would be smashing their faces into the seatbacks in front of them."
@mcgeechan6600 ... lol my calculated TOD with a PA44 Seminole (MTOW 3800 lbs) is about 1400 feet :D ... maybe they just made it cause of water or methanol injection :D *just kidding*
the reason why it took off so fast was that it had very little weight, instead of thousand of pounds, had maybe a max of 400 total :D excluding weight of fuel, oil, etc
I have flown out of gatwick on one of these the acceleration pushed me back in the seat .Also ihave flown an A300 out of adelaide with 3 people on board it was not as fast
You're close.. What you described is a SOFT field takeoff, used when the runway is in, let's call it, less than optimal conditions. Both are very cool however, especially this video
The spectacular TO performance of the 757 is well known. But what most people don't know is that in normal operations, at less than max landing weight the 757 will typically have a slower approach speed and shorter landing rollout than 737's or 320's. Amazing airplane!
Very nice, but I thought that Short Field Take by the book Off is when you rotate prematurally and then flatten the airplane with gear pulling up and pressing it against the ground (it wants to climb) to keep it in heigts smalller than wing span - the ground effect - until you reach the proper take off speed. I'm not the pilot, so I might be wrong... Am I? BTW I've seen only 1 video on YT with AIRLINER doing SFTO, and it was *impressive*.
this plane was empty and performing at an airshow, with the powerful RR engines and an empty plane this is more than possible. Every pilot could do this.
Actually shortly after the cameras stopped rolling this 757 activated its over booster engines (hidden in the tail, of course) and busted through the atmosphere and continued sailing on up to the International Space Station. To this day that 757 remains docked up there. NASA refuses to comment.
By holding on the brakes and putting the throttle fully forward must put a bit of stress on the old crate. My father used to do it with his Bentley turbo at the traffic lights if there was a Porsche alongside.
Take a legend of an overpowered airliner. Avoid loading it up with unecessary things like passengers, a cabin crew, their luggage, water, food or beverage carts. Pump just enough fuel into the tank for the performance and you've got yourself an amazing short takeoff roll.
@egillalmar theoretically.. it also depends on how much lift it's wings are producing and how draggy the plane is.. so... there are so many factors there
@Aviationnation10 The bigger the plane the more lift it develops? So if it has higher thrust to weight ratio that should mean it will take off faster.
@Aviationnation10 Exactly, so the A319 won't in theory take off quicker because it is smaller, it is because of the thrust to weight ratio, size has nothing to do with the matter.
@egillalmar Actually, it also depends on the aerodynamics of the plane. For example, the A380 can takeoff really quickly because of the size of the wings and amount of thrust.
Wow! I've actually flown in TF-FIO before. I remember the last time because I was nervous to hop aboard after reading the same plane was involved in a serious incident in Oslo.
i have an uncle that works for iceland air, he'll be flying the jet that will take me to iceland from boston in a week, i might be able to go to the cockpit too.
When did they start putting winglets on 757s? It does make the '57 look sleeker. And that was a pretty sick takeoff. I thought A320s could do that. I guess it proves what BOEING can do. BTW is this what they do on foreign airlines when they get no bookings? Buzz the airport?
I don't see how you got me "underestimating Boeing." Read it again, get a clue, and when you realize how wrong your comment is I'll accept your apology.
0 payload + minimun fuel onboard + strong headwind = 13 secs take off.
QNH1013 1 day ago
wtf?
SalvageMuzikk 1 week ago
Air show. Plane had low weight and good conditions i guess...
czasamitrudno 2 weeks ago
parameters to make it that short: low temp, near sea level field elevation ,headwind, low weight, full t/o thrust,and ofcourse the static t/o thrust he applied with brakes on, as shown by the nose oleo reaction....good practice
flyingxk 2 weeks ago
Wooooow!
willettgarrett2 2 weeks ago
it's a Boeing : )
Chris84Redfield 3 weeks ago
757s.....kickin ass since 1982.
TheLn14 3 weeks ago 3
Empty plane, no fuel, heavy winds.
Or BIG engines.
athox 4 weeks ago
insane
AX5Z 1 month ago
Must have had a significant headwind on the runway for that take off!
timber733 1 month ago
Fuck that was quick!!
Jungele 1 month ago
Iceland, one of the most loved countries on the planet.
squizzoo 1 month ago
Miss Iceland air was like KTHXBYE :)
kevinric7 1 month ago 2
Uauuuuuuuuuuuu
deltaflayer 1 month ago
truly an impressive flight machine! :o)
drbrandvoll 1 month ago
the fuel is RED BULL- it gives you wings
GtaCd321 2 months ago 18
@GtaCd321 that'll be redundant tho.. Its a plane.
SalvageMuzikk 1 week ago
I lived in the white house just behind the winglet, so this is what I heard for many years. , But I love this ,take off , seem's so unreal , but probably empty, even though I have been told by it's pilot that they are very powerful.
mrkongsimr 2 months ago
OMG!!!!!!
Wyatt277 3 months ago
It must have been completely empty - including fuel tanks! Skinny pilots, etc. Climb rate is amazing! What is it 20 degrees? 25?! Did he (she) land on the same runaway?! Because I would love to see that!!!!
XYZAerial 3 months ago
Not only that I think there was heavy wind that helped built artificial airspeed. The camera clearly has wind hitting hte mic. If you look at the dirt from the back of the plane it seems to go away from the camera. When he takes off he tips his left wing up into the direction of the camera, where the wind would be from. There might be a slight headwind too. I think the main component of the wind is crosswind. Plane also may be little tail heavy at zcog. Plane front lifted easy...
wkr4k4r 2 months ago
@wkr4k4r Absolutely wind component - empty plane.
XYZAerial 2 months ago
wow!
1daleym 3 months ago
The takeoff was unbelievable....wow.
kray97 4 months ago
15'' roll !! woww!!!
deedx 4 months ago
Amazing, and did you see Bjork waving from the window ?
TheSecurdisc 4 months ago
Longest runway in Reykjavik: 1567m. This takeoff is definitely serious sh*t.
ElessarDunedain 4 months ago
Ummmmmm....that was fucking incredible! I wonder how heavy it war
MrGeneralKenobi 5 months ago
@MrGeneralKenobi *Was*
MrGeneralKenobi 5 months ago
No wonder they chose this to ram into the buildings
mathewjohn5174 5 months ago
That's it, big boys with toys!!! :D Those '57s are really beautiful. She's gotta be a joy to fly! :'D
NA734 5 months ago
HOLY FUCK! Was that plane like empty??
FsxCaptainLukas 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FsxCaptainLukas It was not, althoug I don't know exactly how many were aboard.
DanniV8 5 months ago
@FsxCaptainLukas yeah.. I'm pretty sure it was. Was for a show, so I think it was only crew on board, no passengers or cargo
geonosis 4 months ago
3 airbus
UberDome 5 months ago
The 75’ is an exceptional performance machine. In the 90’s, I regularly rode United’s 75’s in and out of Monterey CA. While runway 28L at 7600’ was enough for the lightly loaded old girl, I still remember the excitement of the Carmel visual. An approach off the Pacific, through a canyon, toward a close in mountain range, tight 180, and immediately on the deck. Plenty of go arounds and “terrain pull up” warnings. But, I always felt safe knowing the capabilities of this aircraft and crew.
cc40003 5 months ago
I'm an armchair aviation expert and thanks to my detailed investigation, I can conclude that this airplane is a Boeing 757.
How good am I?
ashatbracks 6 months ago
It starts at 20 seconds, and lifts off at 34!!! 14 seconds... incredible.
mjdronrijp 6 months ago
Rocket Start ...Only 757 !
Hail to 757 one of the Best Airplanes ever built !
TheChefKev 7 months ago
Holy cow! is there a fighter pilot flying that thing?! thats awesome!
BLACKDDRAGON1082 7 months ago
Icelandair WOOT
qour200 7 months ago
WHAT IS THAT? that is crazy!
4500intelx 8 months ago
Since it's doing fly bys, I assume there's no pax or bags/cargo. Really quick takeoff!
BermudaGreenNox 8 months ago
that looks like a lot of fun
neillypilot 9 months ago
on my sight its took about 750m - 800m runway only!!! maybe support by wind....
cta1boy 9 months ago
Cool video - love the 757 - my favorite Airliner...
mpzflightvideo 9 months ago
Woah, it went up WAY before i expected.
Euugor 9 months ago
Do a barrel roll ^_^ !!
Kenny93bv 10 months ago
Ooh god! Iceland was so nice, everybody speak so good English and the products so nice and clean! No hussle.
And the stewardes's of Icelandair are so wonderful.
I had a time of my life in Iceland.
Gosh, I love Iceland, and I love Icelandair.
Cousin of a Icelander.
Zoonjse 11 months ago 5
I didn't recognize this at first because I only thought there was one airport near Reykjavik --- Keflavik.. and its out in the middle of nowhere, not near any buildings. I flew in there last year. I guess there is two?
tchgeek20 11 months ago
@tchgeek20 When you fly with Icelandair, you land at Keflavík / BIKF. This was shot at Reykjavík / BIRK which is the domestic airport and located in downtown Reykjavík
geonosis 4 months ago
i bet that pilots wife had some kinky lingerie on and he couldnt wait to get home
dionsanchez24 11 months ago 2
Reasons why the 757 can do this...
1) It's a 757
2) It's LIGHTLY loaded (i.e. no pax and not a ton of fuel)
3) And yes, if there is any wind, it IS into the wind
As for Renton, I'll check with my uncle; he test flew for Boeing for 30 years, but I doubt they ever took a 757 out of there; not that it couldn't, I just don't think they ever did.
tonyb22 11 months ago
@tonyb22 given that every single 757 was made AT Renton, I'm pretty sure they did
clovis86 11 months ago
@clovis86 - Ahhh...I thought only the 737s were made at Renton. Thanks for catching this.
Something truly remarkable my Uncle told me. I asked him, "How quickly could you stop a 757 on landing?" His reply, "Lightly loaded with full autobrake....touchdown to full-stop about 5-7 seconds, but, everyone would be smashing their faces into the seatbacks in front of them."
tonyb22 11 months ago
Comment removed
mcgeechan6600 1 year ago
That was 1350 Feet (not yards) of ground roll mesured via Goggle earth
mcgeechan6600 1 year ago
@mcgeechan6600 ... lol my calculated TOD with a PA44 Seminole (MTOW 3800 lbs) is about 1400 feet :D ... maybe they just made it cause of water or methanol injection :D *just kidding*
eTaGoSS 11 months ago
Using headwinds is a generally accepted piloting practice. Unless you like running out of runway.
aknorm76 1 year ago
i take it that there were no passengers on board...? lol
1993GOS 1 year ago 17
I would love to see on of these T/O from Renton(where the 737 is built).
yoyoyoyoshua 1 year ago
TOP!WOOOW!!!I love Icelandair!
myczek1 1 year ago
WOW...how..and ehhhhh....AMAZING
yeaom 1 year ago
took the crap out of those engines...
puftepos 1 year ago
The pilots were using headwinds to help takeoff in a short distance
YouReadMyMind 1 year ago
757 is sick it can take of @ 1200 yars haha
Myggomag 1 year ago
The Boeing 757, the sexiest plane of all time
nhra76 1 year ago
wow 13 seconds?!!
tcsurvivor03 1 year ago
Now that is a "green" take off....
Aasmundar 1 year ago
the reason why it took off so fast was that it had very little weight, instead of thousand of pounds, had maybe a max of 400 total :D excluding weight of fuel, oil, etc
fighter512 1 year ago
Back when Iceland had money to blow on such stunts!
johnsdsl 1 year ago 2
Always awesome to see what airliners can really do!
WC3POchannel10A 1 year ago 2
That is just INSANE.
WreckonizeYM 1 year ago
afhverju var hún þarna o.O?
birkirvool 1 year ago
Ok the tiny Cessnas flying out and around this airport use just the same runway lenght for takeoff (approx)...What the cock! haha
Andribakari 1 year ago
thats the most in-efficient way to take off, but looks good
1littlelee 1 year ago
Charged takeoffs are the best. That's why SNA is amazing.
scaremenga 1 year ago
The B757 is overpowered, which means that in standard config, the pilots never use 100% of take off thrust.
MartiniB87 1 year ago
the flaps also play important role on takeoff
:)
zurinok 1 year ago
15 seconds from brakes off to wheels off - not bad :-)
ckyliu 1 year ago
that was short!
airberlin160 1 year ago
I have flown out of gatwick on one of these the acceleration pushed me back in the seat .Also ihave flown an A300 out of adelaide with 3 people on board it was not as fast
bmwnasher 1 year ago
nice performance xD
FSim4ever 1 year ago
wtf.. is that a complete empty plane?
pavcon 1 year ago
@pavcon no, it's loaded. they just want their passengers to get a good bang for their buck.
roatking 1 year ago
wie geil :-O
HENKAir1895 1 year ago
air show nise min take off speed
sertox12345 1 year ago
Keflavik has much better capacity than Reykjavik, which is why most carriers prefer it.
AmfleetII 1 year ago
I'm A Firi'n My Boeing 757!
90lazor 1 year ago
@oakld
You're close.. What you described is a SOFT field takeoff, used when the runway is in, let's call it, less than optimal conditions. Both are very cool however, especially this video
wingnut316 1 year ago
The spectacular TO performance of the 757 is well known. But what most people don't know is that in normal operations, at less than max landing weight the 757 will typically have a slower approach speed and shorter landing rollout than 737's or 320's. Amazing airplane!
nthom1956 1 year ago
i had no idea a 757 could do that :o
Zlin0035 1 year ago
Very nice, but I thought that Short Field Take by the book Off is when you rotate prematurally and then flatten the airplane with gear pulling up and pressing it against the ground (it wants to climb) to keep it in heigts smalller than wing span - the ground effect - until you reach the proper take off speed. I'm not the pilot, so I might be wrong... Am I? BTW I've seen only 1 video on YT with AIRLINER doing SFTO, and it was *impressive*.
oakld 1 year ago
Bloody hell. That's the fastest take-off I've ever seen! I would have shat my pants if I'd been on it.
withnail555 1 year ago
holy shit was that deliberit
TheMarkBarrettShow2 1 year ago
I have flown on a Iceland air 757 out of Keflavik. I did not think that Reykjavik handled 757s
badgerattoadhall 2 years ago
i love 757 its the best!
ararapoly 2 years ago 42
Definitely one of the best looking 757's !!
Excellent capture! 5/5
ArcticEwi 2 years ago 10
wow he hardly made it past the PAPI lights
plasmavor1 2 years ago
thats sick!
VEE1r0tate 2 years ago
757 looks great in this pass!
bladeere14 2 years ago 6
chuja prawda
zenekpiotr 2 years ago
There must have been a strong headwind, as well as high air pressure.
LoopholemanIII 2 years ago
Not necessarily, the RR engines, with an empty aircraft, and not much fuel is VERY schieveable in the very streamlined B757-200 or -300 :)
msezza 2 years ago 5
Jup, with this configuration it climbs like a rocket.
shemish 1 year ago
Wow this is short!!!!!^^
FSXSuperboy 2 years ago
@FSXSuperboy Well all I have to say is I'm not suprised since the 757 was originally built at renton
yoyoyoyoshua 1 year ago
this plane was empty and performing at an airshow, with the powerful RR engines and an empty plane this is more than possible. Every pilot could do this.
ediandpen 2 years ago 3
actually the pratts for the 757 produce more thrust.
d0rkiishchris 2 years ago
no, the RR RB211-535C's, not B's produce more thrust
msezza 2 years ago 3
full flaps !
I gauss !
and he might run the engine then lunch
19BlackLord91 2 years ago
prooves that icelandair pilots are the best
birgir94 2 years ago
@birgir94 You know that the 757 was originally built at the Renton plant so it had to beable to do short takeoffs, so it wasn't really skill
yoyoyoyoshua 1 year ago
i love 757's with winglets...
greengoblin200 2 years ago 7
me too
chadvader93 2 years ago
wow....nicely done...how did he land the plane there afterwards??? Did he???!!!
superfestiva 2 years ago
Actually shortly after the cameras stopped rolling this 757 activated its over booster engines (hidden in the tail, of course) and busted through the atmosphere and continued sailing on up to the International Space Station. To this day that 757 remains docked up there. NASA refuses to comment.
GIRrocks24 2 years ago 99
LOL funny comment
Great video btw Iceland is beautiful I hope to visit it one day, and the 757 too quite a powerful machine :D
imaginelab 2 years ago
@GIRrocks24 - LOL good one.
AeroNevin 11 months ago
wow nicely done!
JanniPink 2 years ago 2
One hell of a kick from those old RB211's
By holding on the brakes and putting the throttle fully forward must put a bit of stress on the old crate. My father used to do it with his Bentley turbo at the traffic lights if there was a Porsche alongside.
viceroytennis 2 years ago
this type of B 757 has the RB211 engines which are way overpowered for this type of aircraft.
This is the best plane as it incorporates state of the art navigation but no fly-by-wire commands. A pilot's plane
( some passengers hate it as it is long and it is being used in some transatlantic markets)
lacuadra70 2 years ago
Take a legend of an overpowered airliner. Avoid loading it up with unecessary things like passengers, a cabin crew, their luggage, water, food or beverage carts. Pump just enough fuel into the tank for the performance and you've got yourself an amazing short takeoff roll.
type2mike 2 years ago
impressive yes...
how strong was the headwind i wonder...
well being iceland its only strong and stronger i guess;)...
jderumeu 2 years ago
Love the 757 sorry they are not in production. Would of love to have seen the proto type -100 series...to see the performance
bktodc 2 years ago
how the hell can it take off in like 5 seconds.....plus reykjavik airport is only roughly 5000m/ft long..........
Mahoney8T7 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dumb pilots! But on another note, here is something I learned today...
Websters Dictionary "Pinch a Loaf"...
Using your sphincter muscle to "pinch" a loaf of shit that is hanging halfway out your ass and won't drop of its own accord. Example:
"Hurry up and finish taking a shit, we're already late! Pinch the loaf if you must!"
joepatroni77 2 years ago
Just stick a rocket on it like they do cargo planes and you can get them airborne in about 5 seconds. Landing is the problem.
dkw12002 2 years ago
The Airbus A319 has a higher thrust to weight ratio meaning that it will theoretically be able to takeoff faster.
egillalmar 2 years ago
@egillalmar i can vouch for that :)
bazman85 1 year ago
@egillalmar theoretically.. it also depends on how much lift it's wings are producing and how draggy the plane is.. so... there are so many factors there
pavcon 1 year ago
@pavcon Basically the 757 is massively over powered, ive seen an empty DHL 757 do exactly the same!
Sterlingjob 1 year ago
@Sterlingjob I like comparing the 757 to a chevette with a v8 when it comes to power. She is definately one magnificent bird.
biggare1980 1 year ago
@biggare1980 If it has RB211's I think comparing it to an Aston Martin V12 would be more fitting, don't you?
scaremenga 1 year ago
@egillalmar nope incorect
Aviationnation10 1 year ago
@egillalmar nope thats because its smaller
Aviationnation10 1 year ago
@Aviationnation10 The bigger the plane the more lift it develops? So if it has higher thrust to weight ratio that should mean it will take off faster.
slaneyboi 1 year ago
@slaneyboi yes bigger planes create more lift as they need more
Aviationnation10 1 year ago
@Aviationnation10 Exactly, so the A319 won't in theory take off quicker because it is smaller, it is because of the thrust to weight ratio, size has nothing to do with the matter.
slaneyboi 1 year ago
@slaneyboi nope it does i know that from living near an airport with a short runway a319 has a shorter takeoff distance as its much smaler
Aviationnation10 1 year ago
@Aviationnation10 I know it has a shorter take-off distance for christ sake, i'm saying the reason is not because it is smaller.
slaneyboi 1 year ago
@egillalmar yeah, of cours it will take off faster, its much smaller than the 757
elyasf 1 year ago
@egillalmar well a A319 and a 757 are completely different planes.
yoyoyoyoshua 1 year ago
@egillalmar not more then the 757-200..
inbound1000 11 months ago
@egillalmar Actually, it also depends on the aerodynamics of the plane. For example, the A380 can takeoff really quickly because of the size of the wings and amount of thrust.
IloveSPIDERZ 11 months ago
wow that is a really short take-off distance! i don't think an Airbus can do that...could it?
JJanho 2 years ago
It's obviously very light due to less fuel for an airshow.
757 is pound for pound the strongest commercial airliner in service and fully fueled can make a 70 degree climb.
MikeMoneyMiami 2 years ago 4
you are very correct. Too bad they stopped manufacturing them
grassroot3 2 years ago
Right, tis a shame
MikeMoneyMiami 2 years ago
oh thats some wicked shit
anil30395 2 years ago
Hard head wind, empty aircraft, hold it hard on the brakes before rolling, impressive non the less.
wafflingdwarf 2 years ago
Crazy bastards. They know how to rollercoaster those 57's Iceland Air do.
hhhvvim 2 years ago 4
wow that was quick
kyleg1471 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
This is so cool
Atli23 2 years ago
wow......a STOL 757 XD
janrusgo 2 years ago
I love the Icelanders. They've got a good secret up there.
wankersaweigh 2 years ago 2
It's a hard wind, so the ground speed is lower and the airplane si capable to fly earlier.
Nitraat154 2 years ago 2
vo nice
otriflugmadur 3 years ago
Impressive! Not extremely challenging takeoff but still good!
NTprductions 3 years ago
And yeah....rock it, Valdis!
Thanks for sharing this!
karriew 3 years ago
Wow! I've actually flown in TF-FIO before. I remember the last time because I was nervous to hop aboard after reading the same plane was involved in a serious incident in Oslo.
karriew 3 years ago
RB211 535 two off please...
I saw a similar, perhaps even more impressive climb at Boeing field many years ago I was gobsmacked.
HunterG1000 3 years ago
God Almighty that was the shortest takeoff run i have ever observed!!!
type2mike 3 years ago
im going to try that with a 737 on fsx witch is the closest to the 757
yournameiswrong 3 years ago
Actually, their are closer aircraft, a 767 for instance.
Airportchris2 3 years ago
Carlovingjosh-I think break release is at the 20-21 second mark. Unbelievable amount of power. The 757 is basically a longer, wider fighter jet!
zaf511 3 years ago 2
that birds got some power!
stejensen 3 years ago 2
the last clip is pretty cool. Its really doing narrow flying.
Gunnar125 3 years ago
wow im flying them to stockholm and my least favorite part of flying is takeoff so I hope I take off that fast
bigplaneboeing 3 years ago
Impressive.
billmaghan 3 years ago
i have an uncle that works for iceland air, he'll be flying the jet that will take me to iceland from boston in a week, i might be able to go to the cockpit too.
dzikiewicz 3 years ago
im 12 so i always get to go into the cockpit
lol
bigplaneboeing 3 years ago 2
Not bad
bmwman87 3 years ago
Takeoff in 12.61 seconds.
Stefnir94 3 years ago 2
at the begining when it took off it jumped.
that was beacause they had the throttle up but were holding the brakes
right?
vrol106 3 years ago
Yeah
egillalmar 3 years ago
Can you pinpoint the second it jumped? I can't see that....
Carlovingjosh 3 years ago
I was on a 7575 last year with thomas cook it didn't have wing lets.
jonno867095 4 years ago
When did they start putting winglets on 757s? It does make the '57 look sleeker. And that was a pretty sick takeoff. I thought A320s could do that. I guess it proves what BOEING can do. BTW is this what they do on foreign airlines when they get no bookings? Buzz the airport?
KINGDOMoftheORION 4 years ago
They are accesory, designed for saving fuel.
zooologist 3 years ago
It was an airshow, the winglets increases the fuel efficiency of the plane, and you are underestimating Boeing.
Stefnir94 3 years ago
I don't see how you got me "underestimating Boeing." Read it again, get a clue, and when you realize how wrong your comment is I'll accept your apology.
KINGDOMoftheORION 3 years ago