different laws of physics or altering our own timelines are not possible even within the parallel universes in the 5th dimension you would need higher dimensions to achieve these
I absolutely love your videos. I have a question about travel in the "Time" direction. If Time and Anti-time are directions just as forward, back, up, down, left, and right are directions, then movement in these directions requires force. What force propels us in the Time direction?
There is only one dimension, the dot. Within the dot contains everything. This guy has a new way of looking at it, and it seams more likely. look up " Crossing the Event Horizon - The Search for the Fundamental Pattern"
It would be dangerous if one of those images jumped out of the spectrum trying to elbow its way to the front of the line because it wanted to be "the first" one doing the talking or the moving that you see him doing. Or because it does not to wave its hand in the third position but tries to go back to the fifth position and waves its hand.
and then you are able to see yourself in your innerchild's point of view and are able to hear your parents voice in the past in the present and in the future. And are also able to hear the voice of your grandparents through your parents realm in the past present and future, if your parents upheld their spirit mind and world which is their spirituality. And also your grandparents and great-grandparents..and so on.
because then if they want to produce a clock with you than they can go back and set clocks at each age with you. In your mindframe. Which is your imagination. By way of your influence which links them to your dimension. They have to also create their own clocks so that you can see further into your history and fix what is broken so that you do not walk into broken glass. Or have anything to hide that may harm you or themselves.
The dimensions that he speaks through is the different age years that he has already passed through.
A Good scientific experiment would be to set a clock at each year Or at each image. And let each year create into each clock so that you are able to remember your years and go back into those dimensions and see yourself in those ages and change the way that you lived. Mend what is broken. And better yourself. And grow to become a better being. If your parents are still alive than you are blessed
Video reminds me of how I perceived things on acid/hallucinogens. A series of moments being created and destroyed. Hardly a good explanation. But explaining the overwhelming experience wasnt easy. You got a sense of knowing some truths you couldnt put into words. Language fell short. In fact one insight I had was so profound that when I tried to tell it to a friend (also tripping) he swore I was speaking gibberish like when a record is played backwards. I thought I was making perfect sense!
Would you say there's a relation between the six directions in our 3D perceivable reality and the six degrees of separation theory? When you mentioned that it seemed rather interesting.
A thought: Might evolution be the "conquest" of dimensionality? Our locomotive abilities allow us to "explore" the 3rd dimension. And the unique human trait of applying memory and planning allows us to hypothetically "explore" the 4th dimension. Because, obviously, we only ever exist in the 3rd dimension. There is only the PRESENT NOW. But our brains allow us to extend our awareness beyond that. Maybe evolution(not just biological) is the universe's way of becoming conscious of all that is.
This has me curious. I've never done it, but has anybody ever watched or listened to this particular piece while on weed, crack or LSD? It almost sounds like a person would have to be on that stuff just to figure this out at all well.
Facebook is immersing yourself into the 4th dimension, because you can visualize with pictures peoples lives in the "now" (default pictures) and "before now" (baby pictures) And, if you wanted to you could chat with them right "now" and ask about their future plans-that is if they're willing to tell. Have you noticed how quick you can get to know someone just by looking at their facebook page? (depending if they posted a lot of info or if it's private). But there really is only truly NOW
The idea of a positive and negative direction is intresting but to me it almost contradicts itself... Instead of applying positive and negative values, consider the "positive direction" to be a person's intstinctual path, basically meaning he/she is moving forward in life (or direction/time). But if time is dimentionless, and is considered a direction, then the idea of "negative direction" could be used as a way of controlling the path taken.
I'm sorry, but as a student of physics, I find pseudoscience like this absolutely repulsive when it attempts to elevate itself to the level of real science. Time is not the 4th dimension, nor does it precede any of the subsequent dimensions of M-theory. Higher-order SPATIAL dimensions, which are theorized to be some sort of Calibi-Yao geometry, are independent of the temporal dimension. Probabilistic universes only arise from quantum mechanical effects -- nothing to do with physical dimensions.
@psychehaha Moreover, because you're don't have any formal credentials in the matter of physics or metaphysics, I think it's best that you preface your videos/blogs with a humble admission that what you purport has no scientific backing, but is rather a fanciful exercise of the imagination.
@psychehaha I'm sorry but as a frequent youtube viewer I can tell you no one understands what you just said so i'll leave you with this... IN ENGLISH.
@psychehaha "Probabilistic universes have nothing to do with physical dimensions" - why would you say that? You are spreading disinformation. Everett's Many Worlds Interpretation says that all of the probabilistic outcomes posited by quantum mechanics are equally real to the one we are observing, and this makes much more sense than the magical mumbo jumbo implied by the Copenhagen Interpretation, of observers somehow collapsing the wave function of the entire universe.
@socratesrock Wow, this is old. Anyway, did you even watch the video I was responding to? To begin, The Everett model is far from being widely accepted. Even if it were, you're missing the point. This video claims that alternate universes arise because time is the 4th dimension and because there are higher dimensions on top of that. That's patently false. Alternative universes (if they exist) arise from quantum mechanical effects (like I said), not from the fact that there are higher dimensions
@psychehaha Everett said that the quantum wavefunction's probabilistic outcomes occur in a subspace which is orthogonal to spacetime. What's at right angles to the fourth dimension? The fifth, of course.
@socratesrock Time is not the 4th dimension. M-theory posits 10 spatial dimensions (many of which are believed to be tiny dimensions that wrap around the first) and 1 temporal dimension independent of each spatial dimension. See here that having 11 dimensions does not point to alternate universes. If you want to square the Everett model (which is far more controversial than M-theory) with M-theory, then you'd have to accept that alternate universes are orthogonal to all 11 dimensions.
@socratesrock And, at that point, physicists don't refer to alternate universes as "higher dimensions". There are 11 spatio-temporal dimensions, and if something is orthogonal to that, it's not considered to be a dimension (dimensions are considered to be either spatial and temporal, and alternate universes are neither). Think about alternate dimensions as different possibilities within the same 11 dimensions.
I completely agree, That time itself is not an actually real. Humans invented time to measure certain activities during the day. When you say you measure time, you are actually measuring duration. That is my opinion.
You don't need a formal education to know what you're thinking/talking about. I don't have any formal physics/science education but I'm somewhat of an amateur scientist/science enthusiast. I'm enjoying my slashes tonight. Does this guy have any formal credentials? Maybe I should spend less time judging/posting and more time searching/researching. Have a nice/pleasant day.
Time is present time, time moves forward in any direction as the events progresses or as it happen in that particular period, by imagination time can move backward,forward,up and down in any direction as far as the mind can reach and it ended there this is in human capacity,time continues in its direction unless a super entity that control time stop it(religious point which exist but extemely difficult to experiment and prove)I WILL BE WITH YOU UNTIL THE END OF TIME so time will end,WORD OF GOD
@XWiLDCaRD13X When described that way in classical physics yeah but the whole point of fringe science is to find ways to match up mathematics with intuitive theory.
Russisch ist sehr schwer, aber das, was die Deutsche Sprache ausmacht, ist, dass man in manchen Fällen Wörter GANZ anders schreibt, ob groß, klein, zusammen etc. - und das ist sehr schwer! Zudem haben in der deutschen Sprache viele Wörter unterschiedliche Bedeutungen, weshalb auch viele Literaten sagen, das man die deutsche Sprache, aufgrund der mehrfachen bedeutenden Wörter gut Gedichte verfassen kann,...
Is time spacial, or what? If the fourth dimension represents time acting on the third dimension, then that would mean it would be representing time for everything in the third dimension? Wouldn't that take space? I for one don't believe time is a dimension, rather a human invention to represent actions within space.
When time is the 4th dimension, how would you measure the duration of two 5 dimensional Spheres, where one is rotating around the other... all that happening in the 6th dimension?
Again Time?
Well, the answer is easy. Time has to be dimensionless. Why don't you finally realize that?!?
Direction is a line or a curve in whatever dimension, but not time. You need time to "walk" in that direction, but it really does not matter, how many dimensions are involved. It is true in every dimension.
@ballaststoffel2 Right! As I've said often in this vlog, time for a 5th dimensional observer would be in the 6th dimension, or for a 2D flatlander would be in the 3rd dimension.
The point of saying that time is a direction not a dimension in the video is the same as saying that "up" or "forward" are not dimensions. "Forward" is not in a specific dimension, it's just a label. Could "forward" be thought of as a direction in the 4th spatial dimension? Sure, within a certain frame of reference.
@10thdim OK, maybe I got you wrong at the first 'take'.
Where we agree: 'forward' is in fact a direction, as you said: 'within a certain frame of reference'. I think, where we are different is our understanding of time. What you present is: Taking a 3-D snapshot every 10th of a second and place all those pictures in parallel in (let's say) the 4th dimension. Well, one can say that the result is the direction of the movements initiated by your decisions. Taking one picture, one can say that
@10thdim ... there is a past and a future picture. So, the illusion is born, that time has a direction, but it hasn't. The movement itself has a direction, and of course one can say, that it takes 'time' to do all the movements. If for example, the earth would rotate around her axis, but not around the sun, would we have seasons? No. If the earth would not spin at all, would we have day and night? No. So, how do we experience time? I think, only in movements in relation to other movements. Alex
@10thdim This may be a stupid question, but why can't you just disregard time altogether? Does it have a key role in mathematical calculations, or is it just a logical tool to express something that's unverified?
I can see how the arrow of time is a compelling concept, because we experience time only forwardly and think backwardly, but why can't you just jump straight over to the 6th dimension? Because up till then, everything is ruled by propability and position, isn't it?
we are playing ourselfes in a finished game :) an online finished game we play together and we are all friends trying to find each other O.o i tried lol
i disagree.i dont think time is moving. i think that we would percieve time as moving because every infinitely small change would be a difference from the last, which we may think as time 'moving forward'. Where it is actually a different point in the 'time' plane.
But you cant jump from different points in time then, just like a 3D object is together, not scattered. we are just experiencing a different point in the time plane at every infinitely small increment, just like atoms and subparticle
@TheJustinfernandez I agree! But this is the difficulty of language in these discussions: from our experience, "time" moves inexorably forward only, this is why physicists often count "time" as being separate from the spatial dimensions (for instance M Theory says there are 10 spatial dimensions plus 1 of time). If you say there was no "time" before our universe then you're talking about both time and anti-time, 2 directions which I would say do make a full spatial dimension.
@TheJustinfernandez Well, to go along with this notion, what I wonder is: what set the "vector" or "motion" which carries our perception through dimensions in this seemingly linear and "forward" direction? Would anti-time appear in a similar fashion to inhabitants there? The "dawn" of the universe might be seen as the 0 co-ordinate along the fourth dimensional line we are along...? In the fifth dimension is there anti-probability, though?
@2ndhandsoul ...Is every Now a "reset" to 0 co-ordinates in order for the fourth dimension to remain at right angles to the fifth? That probably makes no sense. It would probably mean there is no movement, but it's easy to confuse direction with how we consider speed. Relativistically we feel stationary and everything moves around us, while we're moving around to everything else, etc.?
@10thdim My idea about the whole 'time' thing is, that it's nothing but the fourth dimension (direction) of SPACE. Line is made of infinite number of points, square is made of infinite number of lines, cube is made of infinite number of squares and our moving reality - motions - events - time (whatever you call it) is made of infinite number of 'frozen' realities.. imagine it like a single pictures of movie.
@Mind3ck The fourth dimension as we experience it has only possible timeline at a time. So if viewing our fourth dimensional selves from the fifth dimension, my original video suggested, we would see a "long undulating snake" of our bodies, created by those planck-length frames, one frame after another. The actual structure would be much more complex than that, but this is a starting point for visualizing. Watch "The Long Undulating Snake" for more:
@DrWinstonRelthford Yeah, don't you hate people who quote from cranks like Stephen Hawking? How dare Hawking tell us that there's an additional "time-like dimension" that's at right angles to our 4D spacetime.
But wait, why are scientists at Oxford giving support to Bryanton's approach to visualizing the dimensions now? Your comment confuses me.
This still doesn't answer the question of how possible outcomes of the present are connected, except to the past and future, which is the 5th dimension. If I could have become a millionaire based on what I did yesterday, it's not connected to the present, only to the past.
And sorry you cant get out off time..Its just as foolish as talking about perciving 2d creatures..Time can alter but there is no motion without, and then no perception..
Cant really understand how you can forget about these facts..And reality is really what you c and feel..RIGHT OR WRONG really doesnt matter..Since full overview is a paradoks and impossible unless you stand outside..And how are you gonna do that?? Hope you get it..Really dont wanna provoke
Hi Rob! Have you ever thought about , iff you knew everything you would have nothing to do? Have you ever thought about wen you say time works backwards ''not only my idea''. You can also say your perception alters the past and present.Perception is really the ultimate goal, and shouldnt b seperated rom fysics. And its also one of the extra dimensions you talk about..Occupying the same space, yet not perciveable to others hehe..Uhh crasy little me, what can i do.Shut up.Sorry but thats darn hard
When thinking about being in a 4 dimensional point traveling in the 5th dimension, this particular question comes up. When a 4 dimensional point goes down a particular probability space in the 5th dimension, do all the other probabilities become nonexistent since you chose that path? or are we, as observers, only able to experience one probability space at a time, and that you are actually experiencing all possible probabilities simultaneously, that you aren't aware of until you die?
oookaaayyy... I think I'm getting your idea and I must say is very interesting and is somehow logically consistent... but I can't stop asking myself... if time is a direction in the fourth space dimension... why is it that we only move in that particular direction? if we apply the same rules to all dimensions then, we should only be able to move forward and not backwards for instance...
is it an undiscovered force maybe??... can you explain this further?
@nachoijp You and I (and the rest of our universe) are, according to string theorists, embedded in a three dimensional brane - a D3 membrane. The chemical reactions which power our bodies obey the laws of entropy, so therefore we as quantum observers living within these bodies made of 3D atoms and molecules follow the "arrow of time" as we change from state to state in the 3rd dimension. Once you get "outside" of spacetime though, the distinction between past present and future is an illusion.
Everything we know as mass and atoms wouldn't work if transported somehow to the next or previous dimension, meaning we are trapped. Impossible to move about the dimensions. I was thinking how all that infinite "space" and "time" could possibly be contained and able to work. My idea was that each dimension is seperated by a thin layer of "nothing" because if there is "nothing" there you can have infinite amount of any dimensions contained in it. or am i just getting creative?
So our 3d universe is composed of infinite, finite 2d universes.
theyre finite in our dimension but infinite in theirs. say we could travel between dimensions if we were in the 2nd dimension it would be infinite because we are in it. but to the dimension above we would appear finite. just like to a 4d universe we are finite "shapes" in time but because we are in their dimension we are also infinite. In our dimension tiem appears finite to us, but space (3d) is infinite.
he does not grasp the very basics of reality and dares lie and pretend IMAGINATION time as real time. It is not! The 5th demension is vibration and we now know it makes the form of Universe and we can predict the form of it way beyond what we see. His crap is useless junk based on theories that have no foundation. We know the answers and he has none of them right.
Touche. Yes, technically everything in our world (at least anything with two points in time) is a fourth dimension example. The plane also exists in dimensions 5-11. Haha jeez this stuff gets pretty confusing pretty quickly.
Well it moves at about the same speed through time as anyone else. Because going faster or slower doesn't change much about our path in time, not at the speed of an airplane anyway. The speed of light would be a different story.
Are schizophrenic individuals hallucinating? Or are they actually on the forefront of human evolution, out of control of their ability to enter and experience a universe where things that aren't happening in our universe Do happen? ..Then return to our universe where the events didn't happen, and have 'poo flung at them' by 'monkeys' that don't understand...?.?.?
We came from apes, was that always true, or is that only our current universe?
Time presented like this = undeniable existance of fate?
If you take a picture or dimension somewhere in the midle the dimension behind it becomes its past and the dimension before it becomes its future. This means that every image or dimension can be seen as a past, a present or a future depending on the relation it has to the image or dimension before or behind it.
One could asume that even if there are unlimited dimensions, they can only exist if they are all identical to each other. Therefore can we imagine that other dimensions or moments before the one we are living in must have ocured some moments before to alow the possibility of the dimension we live in to exist.
Time is no more than matter interacting with itself and creating the illusion we are moving in time. Time becomes a moment of interaction between matter perceived and translated by our brain. We define the past through our memories saved on the moment matter was interacting with itself. Time can only be when matter interacts. The future becomes a sea of probabilities projected and proceeded inside our brain but the only truth is that we are living in an infinite sea of "presentness".
Nice! I agree, with no change there is no time, no existence. I've talked about this in videos like Slices of Reality watch?v=nheaNclVe2Y and The Flipbook Universe watch?v=Rc_VliIuPhQ But I think it's also important to remember that the past is just as much a "sea of possibilities" as the future. Time in Either Direction watch?v=i0j8oYNFFbw What's Before and After? watch?v=YkGZgxeKSCU Thanks for writing! Rob
In the traditional viewpoint, time = increasing entropy.
In this viewpoint time is one of the two possible directions in the fourth spatial dimension, so time/anti-time = change (which will be increasing or decreasing entropy). You might be interested in my blog entry Logic vs Intuition, where I talk about Schrodinger's definition of life - something that creates "pockets of negative entropy".
I was merely questioning on the "matter interaction" idea.
After viewing "Logic v. Intuition" I made a couple of connections regarding your videos. You are in the camp that MWI, and worse, MM interpretation is actually true. You forget Pilot Wave and Bohemian interpretation. It seems you're also discounting Christoff Kochs excellent work in identifying where cness lies in the neuronal network. It's nice to conjecture. But when you say that conjecture is true... You've missed the point.
@10thdim When I read what you have written here, it seems like you're trying to squeeze the 4th dimension into the 3rd. I don't understand what you're getting at.
Please explain what you believe are the two possible directions in the 4th dimension. As I understand it, the 4th dimension merely observes occurence, and what COULD happen and what DOES happen are reconciled as one (?) thing.
@lithjimmy The third dimension is space without time, the fourth dimension is spacetime. You can't have change without adding the fourth dimension, agreed? You and I observe time flowing in one direction because our bodies are made from thermodynamic chemical reactions, but physicists agree that classical variables such as mass, charge, coupling constants, and other physical constants (except those associated with the weak force) do not change upon time reversal.
@10thdim Please explain 'Variables' that occur in the fourth dimension.
The fourth dimension IS what happens. It's not what could happen. Possibilites, variables, or likelyhoods are only 3dimentional estimations of the 4th dimension. And these predictions are limited to the temporal scope of the observer.
Variables never occur in the 4th dimension. Even YOUR video shows that the 4th dimension is a single point. Variables in time either equal, or are located in higher dimensions.
@lithjimmy Sorry, where do I use the word "variables" in this video? Can you give me a time reference?
The fifth dimension is our probability space, where we're twisting and turning in ways similar to the ant on a mobius strip in the animation this project starts with - as we create our 4D "line of time" most of us are unaware of the fact that our line is being defined at the fifth dimension. Have you seen my new video about the mainstream science acceptance of my idea? watch?v=o87TkFOR_Js
i neither found the use of the word "variable" as such,but i think that lithjimmy may be refering to directions, which, at some level, i can agree that those are variables, anyways, i agree that such coordinates in the 4th dimensions would be fixed and not variable
if you've seen doctor who there's a special called the end of time which is weird because according to your video it would be like saying the end of forwards?
I thought the idea of time being the 4th dimension was under a lot of criticism, and that the 4th and 5th dimensions were actual physical dimensions instead
Um, it would be the same time just at a different 5th dimension value.
Think of it as a your position is different in "5th dimension" however your time is at the same spot.
That's what a function is,
For example, if you want to end up at your position in reality 2 seconds ago, your fifth dimension value would be 0. t(x) = x+2
where t is time and x is the fifth dimension value. The only way to be in the same time as what happened 2 seconds ago, your fifth dimension value has to be 0.
a right angle is not necessarily 3d. You can draw a right angle on a 2d paper :).
To illlustrate it, a third dimension(height) is perpendicular to the 2 dimensions(length and width). But the perpendicularity is in the 3d model. Similarly, the fourth dimension will be perpendicular to the 3 dimensions(length,width,height) in a 4 dimensional model.
well the only plausible theory i think is since you shoot someone you can reverse what happened rather then traveling back in so called "time". But you would have to be able to navigate every atom/particle and reverse it because in theory if you drop an egg and it splatters it is possible to shoot the egg backwards and have the egg fix itself. although even a super computer couldnt do the math on that :P
actually I do doorknob. you are an idiot and dont realize that we percieve time as a direction in the fourth dimension not the 3rd which we live in. TOOL
I will just say the faster we travel the slower time goes, its been proven with an airplane and an atomic clock. The closer you get to the speed of light time will ultimately slow to a crawl because to photons, time dont mean shyt. They are frozen in time. So in a way if time can slow and speed up it could be a direction?
The reason we can see into the past is that for the photons of light traveling through space and carrying the picture of stars or galaxies from where it came, time stands still for the photons of light. Since time is frozen, the picture each photon delivers to us is a moment frozen in time, a time that happened long, long ago from when it left where it came from.
Much longer than any time we were ever taught in school. For the photon of light, time goes neither forward nor backwards. It is frozen in the state it began its journey for anyone to see who looks up.
So atoms move slower, the faster something moves around them? So if our planet moved at the speed of light, we wouldn't be able to move? Considering we are made of atoms?
but if they could Remember this is "relativity"! You can only get "near the speed of light" relative to some other frame of reference. If you speed up relative to another frame of reference, people in that frame, watching you would see your clocks, bodily functions, etc. slow down
Mass, length and time all depend on relative motion.
If you move fast your mass, size and measurement of time differ compared to a stationary observer.
If you examine these equations you will find that as an object approaches the speed of light the passage of time approaches zero.
The equations revolve around two observers, one accelerated the other not, both looking at the same beam of light. Since the speed of the beam of light is constant with respect to each observer, then time must run differently because of the relative motion of the two observers.
So in essence even though you are approaching the speed of light (chasing the light beam) while I am standing still.. to both of us, that beam of light is still moving away from both of us at the exact same rate, even though you are almost traveling at the speed of light while i am standing still. ..It has been experimentally verified in a number of ways, unstable particles created in upper atmoshpere reach the surface but cannot live long enough to do that - unless time for them is slowed down.
Wtf why are you people saying "infinity is a concept" as if that has anything to do with what I am saying. Did I say infinity was a number? No. Can concepts be disproved. Duh... are you guys retarded.
This is REALLY off-topic, I apologize for that, but there's something I can't understand.
I'm taking basic calculus this semester, and can't understand why zero over infinity is undefined. Zero is a clear number- it's expressed to show a void of value in that particular area, and regardless of what it is multiplied/divided by, it's still nothing. Why is it, then, that zero over infinity is undefined? I realize infinity is never-ending, but an infinite amount of nothing is still nothing, right?
While I am not 100% sure, I think an infinite amount of nothing is actually something. Think of a line. A line has values along it right? Right. But, mathematically, there are an infinite amount of points along the line. Each of these points has an infinitely small size (basically 0) yet an infinite amount of them makes up whole values alone the line. Its kind of confusing and I just started learning about it in depth like 2 months ago
A point on a line is just that, it has no length. The moment you say that a point on a line has an infinitely small size, you are redifining a point as a line segment. Almost zero is not zero. If I try to split an imaginary cake in two, I can't, because there is nothing to cut. If I tried to split an imaginary cake into an infinite number of peices, there will still be nothing to cut. The cake will not simply appear in front of me, nor would I have the time or patience to cut thin air forever.
Well now you are just missing the point. A point on a line doesnt "just have" zero length. To just say that is to make a statement without giving any reason behind the statement. As for the imaginary cake thing... yea we aren't in second grade anymore. A point on a line is the limit as you approach that point infinitely from either side. That is why I said basically 0 because you can keep getting closer and closer infinitely toward a number without actually getting to it. Math is fun
And you missed my point entirely. The reason a point has no length, is because it lacks a higher dimension. It is a zero dimensional object, lacking the first dimension. The point is simply undefinable in higher dimensions. You can give it a position, but you can't give it a length. You cannot add nothing an infinite number of times and expect to get something. It's a hard-coded law of the universe. The limit of 0/x as x-> inf. becomes 0. Clearly an infinite nothing is still nothing.
The problem with explaining more than 3 dimensions it that you use the first 3 to try and explain the 4th, 5th and more.
A good start to explaining other dimensions might to be imagine, your imagination as a one of the dimensions. Everyone is hooked up into a dimension that holds all the information about everything, but our bodies can only see so much.
Absolutely, we can't see everything, and if we did see everything that's less interesting than the beautifully detailed cross-sections we are experiencing right here and right now.
But since the extra dimensions physicists are talking about are spatial, that means that every additional spatial dimension is at "right angles" to the one before. If you look up the "point line plane postulate" you'll see that it's an accepted notion to use what we know about the relationships between lower...
...dimensions to help us visualize any number of spatial dimensions. Here's some related videos: Illusions and Reality watch?v=0aSqfZR8v1A Imagining the Omniverse - Addendum watch?v=_MptYznkv14 The Shaman watch?v=pHO2h_NPkE8 What's Before and After? watch?v=YkGZgxeKSCU Thanks for writing! Rob
if i was not moving for say 5 seconds, then i moved around to see myself at those 5 seconds. how would there be a lengthed snake path if i dident move for those 5 seconds?
Our reality is divided into planck-length "slices". Whether you're moving or not, that process is still happening, so what you would see if you didn't move for five seconds is a bunch of 3D "you"s all one after another that were more or less exactly the same. This idea is discussed further in vlogs like
The Flipbook Universe
watch?v=Rc_VliIuPhQ
and Slices of Reality
watch?v=nheaNclVe2Y
and the reason why this "granular nature of spacetime" is important is discussed here:
well, if time is only a direction.... then that means if ur a 2 dimension person u wouldnt die as there isnt a direction of time meaning u wouldnt grow old
For a flatlander, time would be one of the two possible directions in the third spatial dimension. Watch "Slices of Reality" for more about this concept of how time is just a series of planck-length slices in the dimension above the one you're examining - which is the way to change from state to state within the current dimension you're looking at.
the strange thing ive come to realize about time, is that it depends on objects changing, a particle or any other objects must move in order for there to be time, otherwise, there is no recognition that there was any. But another interesting thing is that wherever an object may be, it cannot be truly located at its exact coordinates in space time. Meaning its always an approximation, or a decimal, its never really there
so, how does time flow through objects that dont have finite locations?
In the 8th dimension, the two directions must be a "ray" of possible universes with different but similar initial conditions and another "ray" in the other direction(similar, so that they are attached, and branching, like the 4th dimensions in the 5th dimension). In the 9th dimension, the two directions must be a "ray" of all possible groups of related universes in one direction, and another "ray" in the other(groups of attached universes, like the 6th dimension of attached 5th dimensions.
So, if there are two directions for any dimension, then what would be the two directions for the 5th dimension? For every one possible state for our universe, are there two branching possible states? That's my guess. If that were the case, then the number of possible states for our universe(with its unique initial conditions) increases by a multiple of 2 every Planck second, and every universe would look like a triangle or pyramid when viewed from the 8th dimension.
Here's the argument this project uses: within the fourth dimension, there is only room for a single past and a single future. An individual's memory appears to bear out the single past idea, and that same line of reasoning leads people to assume the hard determinist viewpoint, that there is only one future as well, and our free will is an illusion.
This project says our "now" is really in the fith dimension, and that the two directions are a "ray" of possible futures, and possible pasts.
If you do a search for biocentric tenth dimension you'll find some blogs of mine that don't have youtube videos published yet. These blogs connect to a number of other past discussions that are part of this project, around the mind-blowing idea that the past is just as much a probability space as the future.
Yeah, the "ray" of possible futures and possible pasts makes more sense as the two directions for the 5th dimension. The two directions in the 6th dimension must be the "ray" of possible future timelines and the "ray" of possible "past" timelines. In the 7th dimension, there must be a "ray" of possible instances of our universe in the future and a "ray" of possible instances of our universe in the past.
so if time is a direction, its traveling on an infinate line, subtracting the posibility of time traveling wormholes? and if its a line its a dimension right?
is it true if time wasnt the fourth dimension, or any dimensions for the matter, then time travel would be possible, or impossible?
This is where the word "time" can get us into difficulties. Would you say "forward" is a dimension? I would say it makes more sense to say the opposing directions of forward/backward define a dimension more clearly, in the same way that time/anti-time better defines a dimension.
"Time" is the way you change from state to state: time would be in the 3rd dimension for a 2D flatlander. Any process that allows us to "break out of our line" would be a form of time travel.
I reckon time is measurement of the movement of space. Which includes ageing - ageing is just molecules changing, and DNA not having instructions to keep it renewing the body. eg calenders and clocks here are just describing where the Earth is in relation to the Sun (and other celestial objects), and what point of its rotation on its axis it is on.
Time has been one of the most fascinating concepts to me ever since I was a small child. I will never grow tired of hearing or reading of countless theories and such.
Ya right i dought time is only a momory. I can tell that it starts out with tree dimentions and is fused differently by time. The fifth dimention means that something happened at the same time at the same place but was different but i cant seem to understand the sixth dimention
different laws of physics or altering our own timelines are not possible even within the parallel universes in the 5th dimension you would need higher dimensions to achieve these
truantz91 3 days ago
I'M TO TIRED TO HEAR THE WORDSSSS
dumbchildmusic 2 weeks ago
I absolutely love your videos. I have a question about travel in the "Time" direction. If Time and Anti-time are directions just as forward, back, up, down, left, and right are directions, then movement in these directions requires force. What force propels us in the Time direction?
Sidivan 2 weeks ago
You are in 4d! :O
5up3rp3rs0n 2 weeks ago
There is only one dimension, the dot. Within the dot contains everything. This guy has a new way of looking at it, and it seams more likely. look up " Crossing the Event Horizon - The Search for the Fundamental Pattern"
linkinnark 4 weeks ago
It would be dangerous if one of those images jumped out of the spectrum trying to elbow its way to the front of the line because it wanted to be "the first" one doing the talking or the moving that you see him doing. Or because it does not to wave its hand in the third position but tries to go back to the fifth position and waves its hand.
LavonnieCarter 3 months ago
read my post from the bottom up from the oldest to the newest.
LavonnieCarter 3 months ago
and then you are able to see yourself in your innerchild's point of view and are able to hear your parents voice in the past in the present and in the future. And are also able to hear the voice of your grandparents through your parents realm in the past present and future, if your parents upheld their spirit mind and world which is their spirituality. And also your grandparents and great-grandparents..and so on.
LavonnieCarter 3 months ago
because then if they want to produce a clock with you than they can go back and set clocks at each age with you. In your mindframe. Which is your imagination. By way of your influence which links them to your dimension. They have to also create their own clocks so that you can see further into your history and fix what is broken so that you do not walk into broken glass. Or have anything to hide that may harm you or themselves.
LavonnieCarter 3 months ago
The dimensions that he speaks through is the different age years that he has already passed through.
A Good scientific experiment would be to set a clock at each year Or at each image. And let each year create into each clock so that you are able to remember your years and go back into those dimensions and see yourself in those ages and change the way that you lived. Mend what is broken. And better yourself. And grow to become a better being. If your parents are still alive than you are blessed
LavonnieCarter 3 months ago
Video reminds me of how I perceived things on acid/hallucinogens. A series of moments being created and destroyed. Hardly a good explanation. But explaining the overwhelming experience wasnt easy. You got a sense of knowing some truths you couldnt put into words. Language fell short. In fact one insight I had was so profound that when I tried to tell it to a friend (also tripping) he swore I was speaking gibberish like when a record is played backwards. I thought I was making perfect sense!
outofslumber 6 months ago
so.. our first three dimensions are a point that is the center of the 4-6th dimensions acting as height length and depth from that point????
TheSchneebly 6 months ago
Would you say there's a relation between the six directions in our 3D perceivable reality and the six degrees of separation theory? When you mentioned that it seemed rather interesting.
elchafa 6 months ago
A thought: Might evolution be the "conquest" of dimensionality? Our locomotive abilities allow us to "explore" the 3rd dimension. And the unique human trait of applying memory and planning allows us to hypothetically "explore" the 4th dimension. Because, obviously, we only ever exist in the 3rd dimension. There is only the PRESENT NOW. But our brains allow us to extend our awareness beyond that. Maybe evolution(not just biological) is the universe's way of becoming conscious of all that is.
avedic 7 months ago
This has me curious. I've never done it, but has anybody ever watched or listened to this particular piece while on weed, crack or LSD? It almost sounds like a person would have to be on that stuff just to figure this out at all well.
1958boomergirl 7 months ago
Facebook is immersing yourself into the 4th dimension, because you can visualize with pictures peoples lives in the "now" (default pictures) and "before now" (baby pictures) And, if you wanted to you could chat with them right "now" and ask about their future plans-that is if they're willing to tell. Have you noticed how quick you can get to know someone just by looking at their facebook page? (depending if they posted a lot of info or if it's private). But there really is only truly NOW
SwedishviKingohnoes 8 months ago
@SwedishviKingohnoes your high arn't you...
gameman201 6 months ago
@gameman201 what makes you ask that?
SwedishviKingohnoes 3 months ago
A bit confusing and hard to follow. But in general thanks for the upload.
alsk123654 8 months ago
i wonder.. how would anti-time display itself? maybe as an gigantic flashback to the beholder.
or maybe even percieved as forward which could link to dejavu effects.
TheJustinfernandez 8 months ago
The idea of a positive and negative direction is intresting but to me it almost contradicts itself... Instead of applying positive and negative values, consider the "positive direction" to be a person's intstinctual path, basically meaning he/she is moving forward in life (or direction/time). But if time is dimentionless, and is considered a direction, then the idea of "negative direction" could be used as a way of controlling the path taken.
rennager1 8 months ago
Gravity distorts the 4th dimension.
supergsx 9 months ago
I'm sorry, but as a student of physics, I find pseudoscience like this absolutely repulsive when it attempts to elevate itself to the level of real science. Time is not the 4th dimension, nor does it precede any of the subsequent dimensions of M-theory. Higher-order SPATIAL dimensions, which are theorized to be some sort of Calibi-Yao geometry, are independent of the temporal dimension. Probabilistic universes only arise from quantum mechanical effects -- nothing to do with physical dimensions.
psychehaha 10 months ago
@psychehaha Moreover, because you're don't have any formal credentials in the matter of physics or metaphysics, I think it's best that you preface your videos/blogs with a humble admission that what you purport has no scientific backing, but is rather a fanciful exercise of the imagination.
psychehaha 10 months ago
@psychehaha I'm sorry but as a frequent youtube viewer I can tell you no one understands what you just said so i'll leave you with this... IN ENGLISH.
MrGeassR2 2 months ago
@psychehaha "Probabilistic universes have nothing to do with physical dimensions" - why would you say that? You are spreading disinformation. Everett's Many Worlds Interpretation says that all of the probabilistic outcomes posited by quantum mechanics are equally real to the one we are observing, and this makes much more sense than the magical mumbo jumbo implied by the Copenhagen Interpretation, of observers somehow collapsing the wave function of the entire universe.
socratesrock 2 months ago
@socratesrock Wow, this is old. Anyway, did you even watch the video I was responding to? To begin, The Everett model is far from being widely accepted. Even if it were, you're missing the point. This video claims that alternate universes arise because time is the 4th dimension and because there are higher dimensions on top of that. That's patently false. Alternative universes (if they exist) arise from quantum mechanical effects (like I said), not from the fact that there are higher dimensions
psychehaha 2 months ago
@psychehaha Everett said that the quantum wavefunction's probabilistic outcomes occur in a subspace which is orthogonal to spacetime. What's at right angles to the fourth dimension? The fifth, of course.
socratesrock 2 months ago
@socratesrock Time is not the 4th dimension. M-theory posits 10 spatial dimensions (many of which are believed to be tiny dimensions that wrap around the first) and 1 temporal dimension independent of each spatial dimension. See here that having 11 dimensions does not point to alternate universes. If you want to square the Everett model (which is far more controversial than M-theory) with M-theory, then you'd have to accept that alternate universes are orthogonal to all 11 dimensions.
psychehaha 2 months ago
@socratesrock And, at that point, physicists don't refer to alternate universes as "higher dimensions". There are 11 spatio-temporal dimensions, and if something is orthogonal to that, it's not considered to be a dimension (dimensions are considered to be either spatial and temporal, and alternate universes are neither). Think about alternate dimensions as different possibilities within the same 11 dimensions.
psychehaha 2 months ago
I completely agree, That time itself is not an actually real. Humans invented time to measure certain activities during the day. When you say you measure time, you are actually measuring duration. That is my opinion.
StandardVideoTech 10 months ago
You don't need a formal education to know what you're thinking/talking about. I don't have any formal physics/science education but I'm somewhat of an amateur scientist/science enthusiast. I'm enjoying my slashes tonight. Does this guy have any formal credentials? Maybe I should spend less time judging/posting and more time searching/researching. Have a nice/pleasant day.
Cosmodot256 10 months ago
there are 3 deminsions... the rest are irrelevent to us.
PeacefulParadox 1 year ago
Time is present time, time moves forward in any direction as the events progresses or as it happen in that particular period, by imagination time can move backward,forward,up and down in any direction as far as the mind can reach and it ended there this is in human capacity,time continues in its direction unless a super entity that control time stop it(religious point which exist but extemely difficult to experiment and prove)I WILL BE WITH YOU UNTIL THE END OF TIME so time will end,WORD OF GOD
ceboym 1 year ago
THE HUMAN CENTIPEDE
AreaQNH870 1 year ago
Time is a scalar quantity. Not a vector. It only has magnitude, not direction.
XWiLDCaRD13X 1 year ago
@XWiLDCaRD13X When described that way in classical physics yeah but the whole point of fringe science is to find ways to match up mathematics with intuitive theory.
PopeOnArope123 11 months ago
WRONG time is a human perception. Direction is time AND SPACE.
NebunLaCap 1 year ago
What time is it?
kalitexnis10 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Russisch ist sehr schwer, aber das, was die Deutsche Sprache ausmacht, ist, dass man in manchen Fällen Wörter GANZ anders schreibt, ob groß, klein, zusammen etc. - und das ist sehr schwer! Zudem haben in der deutschen Sprache viele Wörter unterschiedliche Bedeutungen, weshalb auch viele Literaten sagen, das man die deutsche Sprache, aufgrund der mehrfachen bedeutenden Wörter gut Gedichte verfassen kann,...
oitor 1 year ago
Is time spacial, or what? If the fourth dimension represents time acting on the third dimension, then that would mean it would be representing time for everything in the third dimension? Wouldn't that take space? I for one don't believe time is a dimension, rather a human invention to represent actions within space.
MetalShreader 1 year ago
When time is the 4th dimension, how would you measure the duration of two 5 dimensional Spheres, where one is rotating around the other... all that happening in the 6th dimension?
Again Time?
Well, the answer is easy. Time has to be dimensionless. Why don't you finally realize that?!?
Direction is a line or a curve in whatever dimension, but not time. You need time to "walk" in that direction, but it really does not matter, how many dimensions are involved. It is true in every dimension.
ballaststoffel2 1 year ago
@ballaststoffel2 Right! As I've said often in this vlog, time for a 5th dimensional observer would be in the 6th dimension, or for a 2D flatlander would be in the 3rd dimension.
The point of saying that time is a direction not a dimension in the video is the same as saying that "up" or "forward" are not dimensions. "Forward" is not in a specific dimension, it's just a label. Could "forward" be thought of as a direction in the 4th spatial dimension? Sure, within a certain frame of reference.
Rob
10thdim 1 year ago 4
@10thdim OK, maybe I got you wrong at the first 'take'.
Where we agree: 'forward' is in fact a direction, as you said: 'within a certain frame of reference'. I think, where we are different is our understanding of time. What you present is: Taking a 3-D snapshot every 10th of a second and place all those pictures in parallel in (let's say) the 4th dimension. Well, one can say that the result is the direction of the movements initiated by your decisions. Taking one picture, one can say that
ballaststoffel2 1 year ago
@10thdim ... there is a past and a future picture. So, the illusion is born, that time has a direction, but it hasn't. The movement itself has a direction, and of course one can say, that it takes 'time' to do all the movements. If for example, the earth would rotate around her axis, but not around the sun, would we have seasons? No. If the earth would not spin at all, would we have day and night? No. So, how do we experience time? I think, only in movements in relation to other movements. Alex
ballaststoffel2 1 year ago
@10thdim This may be a stupid question, but why can't you just disregard time altogether? Does it have a key role in mathematical calculations, or is it just a logical tool to express something that's unverified?
I can see how the arrow of time is a compelling concept, because we experience time only forwardly and think backwardly, but why can't you just jump straight over to the 6th dimension? Because up till then, everything is ruled by propability and position, isn't it?
gannen33 11 months ago
we are playing ourselfes in a finished game :) an online finished game we play together and we are all friends trying to find each other O.o i tried lol
RASAlexander 1 year ago
i disagree.i dont think time is moving. i think that we would percieve time as moving because every infinitely small change would be a difference from the last, which we may think as time 'moving forward'. Where it is actually a different point in the 'time' plane.
But you cant jump from different points in time then, just like a 3D object is together, not scattered. we are just experiencing a different point in the time plane at every infinitely small increment, just like atoms and subparticle
agmarkis 1 year ago
you make time to a direction. But time itself is NO direction, just moving.
ballaststoffel2 1 year ago
@10thdim
you are welcome
TheJustinfernandez 1 year ago
i dunno.. if the absolute is infinite and there was no concept of time before the creation of the universe.
Then shouldn't it be more than just mere a direction.
TheJustinfernandez 1 year ago
@TheJustinfernandez I agree! But this is the difficulty of language in these discussions: from our experience, "time" moves inexorably forward only, this is why physicists often count "time" as being separate from the spatial dimensions (for instance M Theory says there are 10 spatial dimensions plus 1 of time). If you say there was no "time" before our universe then you're talking about both time and anti-time, 2 directions which I would say do make a full spatial dimension.
Thanks!
Rob
10thdim 1 year ago
@TheJustinfernandez Well, to go along with this notion, what I wonder is: what set the "vector" or "motion" which carries our perception through dimensions in this seemingly linear and "forward" direction? Would anti-time appear in a similar fashion to inhabitants there? The "dawn" of the universe might be seen as the 0 co-ordinate along the fourth dimensional line we are along...? In the fifth dimension is there anti-probability, though?
2ndhandsoul 1 month ago
@2ndhandsoul ...Is every Now a "reset" to 0 co-ordinates in order for the fourth dimension to remain at right angles to the fifth? That probably makes no sense. It would probably mean there is no movement, but it's easy to confuse direction with how we consider speed. Relativistically we feel stationary and everything moves around us, while we're moving around to everything else, etc.?
2ndhandsoul 1 month ago
i've been thinking about the same thing,
but if,
infinite 1d lines make a 2d plane,
infinite 2d planes make 3d world,
and a set of such infinite 3d universe is 4th d i.e. time+anti-time,
theory leads to nowhere but a bunch of infinite dimensions.
then why string theory requires only 22 dimension.
andy1166948 1 year ago
Godd job, Rob - always enjoy your submissions.
DrDeist 1 year ago
@10thdim My idea about the whole 'time' thing is, that it's nothing but the fourth dimension (direction) of SPACE. Line is made of infinite number of points, square is made of infinite number of lines, cube is made of infinite number of squares and our moving reality - motions - events - time (whatever you call it) is made of infinite number of 'frozen' realities.. imagine it like a single pictures of movie.
Just my idea... Correct me if I'm wrong.
Mind3ck 1 year ago
@Mind3ck Yes, that's what we're saying in this video and with this project.
Thanks for writing!
Rob
10thdim 1 year ago
@10thdim Then I wonder how does our 'time-space' space look like for a observer who is beyond time.. Or how does light look..
According to this it should all look like a mess of matter.
Can you imagine that?
Mind3ck 1 year ago
@Mind3ck The fourth dimension as we experience it has only possible timeline at a time. So if viewing our fourth dimensional selves from the fifth dimension, my original video suggested, we would see a "long undulating snake" of our bodies, created by those planck-length frames, one frame after another. The actual structure would be much more complex than that, but this is a starting point for visualizing. Watch "The Long Undulating Snake" for more:
watch?v=ZKNJmrdA0Fg
Thanks for writing!
Rob
10thdim 1 year ago
This dude's a crank.
DrWinstonRelthford 1 year ago
@DrWinstonRelthford Yeah, don't you hate people who quote from cranks like Stephen Hawking? How dare Hawking tell us that there's an additional "time-like dimension" that's at right angles to our 4D spacetime.
But wait, why are scientists at Oxford giving support to Bryanton's approach to visualizing the dimensions now? Your comment confuses me.
watch?v=o87TkFOR_Js
socratesrock 1 year ago
A agree. But in the wikipedia it says that you're wrong and that time is not the 4th dimension. :<
MrNitt 1 year ago
This still doesn't answer the question of how possible outcomes of the present are connected, except to the past and future, which is the 5th dimension. If I could have become a millionaire based on what I did yesterday, it's not connected to the present, only to the past.
1ibertaire 1 year ago
And sorry you cant get out off time..Its just as foolish as talking about perciving 2d creatures..Time can alter but there is no motion without, and then no perception..
Cant really understand how you can forget about these facts..And reality is really what you c and feel..RIGHT OR WRONG really doesnt matter..Since full overview is a paradoks and impossible unless you stand outside..And how are you gonna do that?? Hope you get it..Really dont wanna provoke
ppedalen 1 year ago
Hi Rob! Have you ever thought about , iff you knew everything you would have nothing to do? Have you ever thought about wen you say time works backwards ''not only my idea''. You can also say your perception alters the past and present.Perception is really the ultimate goal, and shouldnt b seperated rom fysics. And its also one of the extra dimensions you talk about..Occupying the same space, yet not perciveable to others hehe..Uhh crasy little me, what can i do.Shut up.Sorry but thats darn hard
ppedalen 1 year ago
conscious reference to location = time
sidebander 1 year ago
When thinking about being in a 4 dimensional point traveling in the 5th dimension, this particular question comes up. When a 4 dimensional point goes down a particular probability space in the 5th dimension, do all the other probabilities become nonexistent since you chose that path? or are we, as observers, only able to experience one probability space at a time, and that you are actually experiencing all possible probabilities simultaneously, that you aren't aware of until you die?
Kasu1917 1 year ago
oookaaayyy... I think I'm getting your idea and I must say is very interesting and is somehow logically consistent... but I can't stop asking myself... if time is a direction in the fourth space dimension... why is it that we only move in that particular direction? if we apply the same rules to all dimensions then, we should only be able to move forward and not backwards for instance...
is it an undiscovered force maybe??... can you explain this further?
nachoijp 1 year ago
@nachoijp You and I (and the rest of our universe) are, according to string theorists, embedded in a three dimensional brane - a D3 membrane. The chemical reactions which power our bodies obey the laws of entropy, so therefore we as quantum observers living within these bodies made of 3D atoms and molecules follow the "arrow of time" as we change from state to state in the 3rd dimension. Once you get "outside" of spacetime though, the distinction between past present and future is an illusion.
10thdim 1 year ago
@nachoijp Our universe is bound by the second law of thermodynamics. Don't know if that's the correct answer but I tried.
DbaBro1 1 year ago
Entertaining and informative.
Good work.
Awesomenessincarnate 1 year ago
i'm sorry but the whole worm time thing was too distracting. i couldn't pay attention
terra61 1 year ago
kabbalah
fahrigonzo 1 year ago
Everything we know as mass and atoms wouldn't work if transported somehow to the next or previous dimension, meaning we are trapped. Impossible to move about the dimensions. I was thinking how all that infinite "space" and "time" could possibly be contained and able to work. My idea was that each dimension is seperated by a thin layer of "nothing" because if there is "nothing" there you can have infinite amount of any dimensions contained in it. or am i just getting creative?
RainbowsixOperator 1 year ago
So our 3d universe is composed of infinite, finite 2d universes.
theyre finite in our dimension but infinite in theirs. say we could travel between dimensions if we were in the 2nd dimension it would be infinite because we are in it. but to the dimension above we would appear finite. just like to a 4d universe we are finite "shapes" in time but because we are in their dimension we are also infinite. In our dimension tiem appears finite to us, but space (3d) is infinite.
RainbowsixOperator 1 year ago
Ive been thinking about the dimensions. So our matter is composed of finite 2d universes?
RainbowsixOperator 1 year ago
he does not grasp the very basics of reality and dares lie and pretend IMAGINATION time as real time. It is not! The 5th demension is vibration and we now know it makes the form of Universe and we can predict the form of it way beyond what we see. His crap is useless junk based on theories that have no foundation. We know the answers and he has none of them right.
Peterwhitlock 1 year ago
Question: An airplane (or other thing), isn`t an example os a 4 dimension world? He can go
up - down
left - right
front - back (i know he cant fly backwards)
and he can also go faster or slower (time)
ricardot82 1 year ago
Touche. Yes, technically everything in our world (at least anything with two points in time) is a fourth dimension example. The plane also exists in dimensions 5-11. Haha jeez this stuff gets pretty confusing pretty quickly.
fromallsides 1 year ago
Well it moves at about the same speed through time as anyone else. Because going faster or slower doesn't change much about our path in time, not at the speed of an airplane anyway. The speed of light would be a different story.
SirPinguin 1 year ago
i smoke weed !
NecrotiKmax 2 years ago 34
Does a person's 'spime' body begin at conception?
Are schizophrenic individuals hallucinating? Or are they actually on the forefront of human evolution, out of control of their ability to enter and experience a universe where things that aren't happening in our universe Do happen? ..Then return to our universe where the events didn't happen, and have 'poo flung at them' by 'monkeys' that don't understand...?.?.?
We came from apes, was that always true, or is that only our current universe?
VegetoStevieD 2 years ago 3
I can't help but laugh at the beginning song...
it says....
pussy pussy pussy tits tits tits tits.....
ThEGrEaTGiG735 2 years ago 50
lolz
VegetoStevieD 2 years ago
You're so right!! I never noticed it until you pointed it out.
kryzian 2 years ago
@ThEGrEaTGiG735 Rolf i recorded Rolf
belley669 1 year ago
@ThEGrEaTGiG735 HAHA IT DOES
bajs47m16 1 year ago
@ThEGrEaTGiG735 OMG LMAOOO you are such a dirty mind!
strawberry5999 11 months ago
@ThEGrEaTGiG735 OMG LMAOOO you are such a dirty mind! I didn't notice that before reading your comment
strawberry5999 11 months ago
@ThEGrEaTGiG735 LOL never actually realized it sound this way, hahah
Morr1992 11 months ago
I can't help but laugh from 1:47 to 1:57.
lnstrumentalist 2 years ago
I can't help it, but I laugh from beginning to end!
StrumstickJoe 2 years ago
Time presented like this = undeniable existance of fate?
If you take a picture or dimension somewhere in the midle the dimension behind it becomes its past and the dimension before it becomes its future. This means that every image or dimension can be seen as a past, a present or a future depending on the relation it has to the image or dimension before or behind it.
Fapsamup 2 years ago
One could asume that even if there are unlimited dimensions, they can only exist if they are all identical to each other. Therefore can we imagine that other dimensions or moments before the one we are living in must have ocured some moments before to alow the possibility of the dimension we live in to exist.
Fapsamup 2 years ago
Time is no more than matter interacting with itself and creating the illusion we are moving in time. Time becomes a moment of interaction between matter perceived and translated by our brain. We define the past through our memories saved on the moment matter was interacting with itself. Time can only be when matter interacts. The future becomes a sea of probabilities projected and proceeded inside our brain but the only truth is that we are living in an infinite sea of "presentness".
Fapsamup 2 years ago 4
10thdim 2 years ago
Matter interacts only when energized. This is called heat. Are you saying that Time = Heat?
Exmech2 2 years ago
In the traditional viewpoint, time = increasing entropy.
In this viewpoint time is one of the two possible directions in the fourth spatial dimension, so time/anti-time = change (which will be increasing or decreasing entropy). You might be interested in my blog entry Logic vs Intuition, where I talk about Schrodinger's definition of life - something that creates "pockets of negative entropy".
watch?v=GrReVlTUpLA
I like that thought.
Thanks for writing,
Rob
10thdim 2 years ago
I was merely questioning on the "matter interaction" idea.
After viewing "Logic v. Intuition" I made a couple of connections regarding your videos. You are in the camp that MWI, and worse, MM interpretation is actually true. You forget Pilot Wave and Bohemian interpretation. It seems you're also discounting Christoff Kochs excellent work in identifying where cness lies in the neuronal network. It's nice to conjecture. But when you say that conjecture is true... You've missed the point.
Exmech2 2 years ago
@10thdim When I read what you have written here, it seems like you're trying to squeeze the 4th dimension into the 3rd. I don't understand what you're getting at.
Please explain what you believe are the two possible directions in the 4th dimension. As I understand it, the 4th dimension merely observes occurence, and what COULD happen and what DOES happen are reconciled as one (?) thing.
lithjimmy 1 year ago
@lithjimmy The third dimension is space without time, the fourth dimension is spacetime. You can't have change without adding the fourth dimension, agreed? You and I observe time flowing in one direction because our bodies are made from thermodynamic chemical reactions, but physicists agree that classical variables such as mass, charge, coupling constants, and other physical constants (except those associated with the weak force) do not change upon time reversal.
Thanks for writing,
Rob
10thdim 1 year ago
@10thdim Please explain 'Variables' that occur in the fourth dimension.
The fourth dimension IS what happens. It's not what could happen. Possibilites, variables, or likelyhoods are only 3dimentional estimations of the 4th dimension. And these predictions are limited to the temporal scope of the observer.
Variables never occur in the 4th dimension. Even YOUR video shows that the 4th dimension is a single point. Variables in time either equal, or are located in higher dimensions.
lithjimmy 1 year ago
@lithjimmy Sorry, where do I use the word "variables" in this video? Can you give me a time reference?
The fifth dimension is our probability space, where we're twisting and turning in ways similar to the ant on a mobius strip in the animation this project starts with - as we create our 4D "line of time" most of us are unaware of the fact that our line is being defined at the fifth dimension. Have you seen my new video about the mainstream science acceptance of my idea? watch?v=o87TkFOR_Js
Rob
10thdim 1 year ago
i neither found the use of the word "variable" as such,but i think that lithjimmy may be refering to directions, which, at some level, i can agree that those are variables, anyways, i agree that such coordinates in the 4th dimensions would be fixed and not variable
renelielwero 1 year ago
@Fapsamup This is simply your awarenees of an physical world
belley669 1 year ago
if you've seen doctor who there's a special called the end of time which is weird because according to your video it would be like saying the end of forwards?
curiositygun93 2 years ago
I thought the idea of time being the 4th dimension was under a lot of criticism, and that the 4th and 5th dimensions were actual physical dimensions instead
quuaa1 2 years ago
Um, it would be the same time just at a different 5th dimension value.
Think of it as a your position is different in "5th dimension" however your time is at the same spot.
That's what a function is,
For example, if you want to end up at your position in reality 2 seconds ago, your fifth dimension value would be 0. t(x) = x+2
where t is time and x is the fifth dimension value. The only way to be in the same time as what happened 2 seconds ago, your fifth dimension value has to be 0.
O0oSorousho0O 2 years ago
0:20 you did the wave :P
O0oSorousho0O 2 years ago
Duration.
10thdim 2 years ago
a right angle is not necessarily 3d. You can draw a right angle on a 2d paper :).
To illlustrate it, a third dimension(height) is perpendicular to the 2 dimensions(length and width). But the perpendicularity is in the 3d model. Similarly, the fourth dimension will be perpendicular to the 3 dimensions(length,width,height) in a 4 dimensional model.
vetiarvind 2 years ago
well the only plausible theory i think is since you shoot someone you can reverse what happened rather then traveling back in so called "time". But you would have to be able to navigate every atom/particle and reverse it because in theory if you drop an egg and it splatters it is possible to shoot the egg backwards and have the egg fix itself. although even a super computer couldnt do the math on that :P
viktorj85 2 years ago
because 1 egg has a bazzilion particles ;p
viktorj85 2 years ago
You folks are really bsing yourselves. Time is not a direction.
Time is NOT the percived reality that we see through the travel of light, at very high speeds.
If something happens a million lightyears away that thing has happend there.
It doesn't matter that it takes us many many years to see that with a telescope of some sort.
It has still happend, its reflection just took some time to travel.
Damn, the more I'm reading about this stuff the more I fear a new dark age.
omfg4000 2 years ago
lol wow good for you, you just stated a tree does make a sound even though nobody is there to hear it. clap clap
viktorj85 2 years ago
You don't even know what sound is.
omfg4000 2 years ago
actually I do doorknob. you are an idiot and dont realize that we percieve time as a direction in the fourth dimension not the 3rd which we live in. TOOL
viktorj85 2 years ago
Comment removed
viktorj85 2 years ago
Stop calling people dummy because you'll end up being one. Only a fool turns to insults.
Time does not stop because all light is extinguished. Sound is made impossible if all air is removed.
Let's hope this doesn't blow your mind.
omfg4000 2 years ago
Comment removed
viktorj85 2 years ago
So do you mean to say that sound-waves that DO require a medium aren't a dimension, but time that doesn't require one is?
omfg4000 2 years ago
I will just say the faster we travel the slower time goes, its been proven with an airplane and an atomic clock. The closer you get to the speed of light time will ultimately slow to a crawl because to photons, time dont mean shyt. They are frozen in time. So in a way if time can slow and speed up it could be a direction?
viktorj85 2 years ago
Oh and light does not distinguish my buddy photons live forever traveling at the speed of light.
viktorj85 2 years ago
The reason we can see into the past is that for the photons of light traveling through space and carrying the picture of stars or galaxies from where it came, time stands still for the photons of light. Since time is frozen, the picture each photon delivers to us is a moment frozen in time, a time that happened long, long ago from when it left where it came from.
viktorj85 2 years ago
Much longer than any time we were ever taught in school. For the photon of light, time goes neither forward nor backwards. It is frozen in the state it began its journey for anyone to see who looks up.
viktorj85 2 years ago
<hmm! Interesting.
So atoms move slower, the faster something moves around them? So if our planet moved at the speed of light, we wouldn't be able to move? Considering we are made of atoms?
omfg4000 2 years ago
atoms cannot exist at the speed of light ;p
but if they could Remember this is "relativity"! You can only get "near the speed of light" relative to some other frame of reference. If you speed up relative to another frame of reference, people in that frame, watching you would see your clocks, bodily functions, etc. slow down
Mass, length and time all depend on relative motion.
If you move fast your mass, size and measurement of time differ compared to a stationary observer.
viktorj85 2 years ago
If you examine these equations you will find that as an object approaches the speed of light the passage of time approaches zero.
The equations revolve around two observers, one accelerated the other not, both looking at the same beam of light. Since the speed of the beam of light is constant with respect to each observer, then time must run differently because of the relative motion of the two observers.
viktorj85 2 years ago
So in essence even though you are approaching the speed of light (chasing the light beam) while I am standing still.. to both of us, that beam of light is still moving away from both of us at the exact same rate, even though you are almost traveling at the speed of light while i am standing still. ..It has been experimentally verified in a number of ways, unstable particles created in upper atmoshpere reach the surface but cannot live long enough to do that - unless time for them is slowed down.
viktorj85 2 years ago
time is percieved to be a direction in THE FOURTH DIMENTION
viktorj85 2 years ago
Your English is perfect. Your voice is so nice, and clear. I will watch all of your videos. I like the topic anyway.
bosommaster 2 years ago
I reckon a proof disproving infinity would be devastating to these kind of ideas.
OntologicalQuandary 2 years ago
Good thing you can;t disprove a concept.
kuzuboshii 2 years ago
Infinity is a concept, not a number.
sweYoda 2 years ago
Wtf why are you people saying "infinity is a concept" as if that has anything to do with what I am saying. Did I say infinity was a number? No. Can concepts be disproved. Duh... are you guys retarded.
OntologicalQuandary 2 years ago
This is REALLY off-topic, I apologize for that, but there's something I can't understand.
I'm taking basic calculus this semester, and can't understand why zero over infinity is undefined. Zero is a clear number- it's expressed to show a void of value in that particular area, and regardless of what it is multiplied/divided by, it's still nothing. Why is it, then, that zero over infinity is undefined? I realize infinity is never-ending, but an infinite amount of nothing is still nothing, right?
PeterDivine 2 years ago
While I am not 100% sure, I think an infinite amount of nothing is actually something. Think of a line. A line has values along it right? Right. But, mathematically, there are an infinite amount of points along the line. Each of these points has an infinitely small size (basically 0) yet an infinite amount of them makes up whole values alone the line. Its kind of confusing and I just started learning about it in depth like 2 months ago
OntologicalQuandary 2 years ago
A point on a line is just that, it has no length. The moment you say that a point on a line has an infinitely small size, you are redifining a point as a line segment. Almost zero is not zero. If I try to split an imaginary cake in two, I can't, because there is nothing to cut. If I tried to split an imaginary cake into an infinite number of peices, there will still be nothing to cut. The cake will not simply appear in front of me, nor would I have the time or patience to cut thin air forever.
Dratelgen 2 years ago
Well now you are just missing the point. A point on a line doesnt "just have" zero length. To just say that is to make a statement without giving any reason behind the statement. As for the imaginary cake thing... yea we aren't in second grade anymore. A point on a line is the limit as you approach that point infinitely from either side. That is why I said basically 0 because you can keep getting closer and closer infinitely toward a number without actually getting to it. Math is fun
OntologicalQuandary 2 years ago
And you missed my point entirely. The reason a point has no length, is because it lacks a higher dimension. It is a zero dimensional object, lacking the first dimension. The point is simply undefinable in higher dimensions. You can give it a position, but you can't give it a length. You cannot add nothing an infinite number of times and expect to get something. It's a hard-coded law of the universe. The limit of 0/x as x-> inf. becomes 0. Clearly an infinite nothing is still nothing.
Dratelgen 2 years ago
The problem with explaining more than 3 dimensions it that you use the first 3 to try and explain the 4th, 5th and more.
A good start to explaining other dimensions might to be imagine, your imagination as a one of the dimensions. Everyone is hooked up into a dimension that holds all the information about everything, but our bodies can only see so much.
KennTollens 2 years ago
Absolutely, we can't see everything, and if we did see everything that's less interesting than the beautifully detailed cross-sections we are experiencing right here and right now.
But since the extra dimensions physicists are talking about are spatial, that means that every additional spatial dimension is at "right angles" to the one before. If you look up the "point line plane postulate" you'll see that it's an accepted notion to use what we know about the relationships between lower...
10thdim 2 years ago
10thdim 2 years ago
all thought is creative dammit! yeahhhh! hooray! everything that I think is real ^^
naturecollision 2 years ago
(in your so called snake path)
if i was not moving for say 5 seconds, then i moved around to see myself at those 5 seconds. how would there be a lengthed snake path if i dident move for those 5 seconds?
cooungry 2 years ago
Our reality is divided into planck-length "slices". Whether you're moving or not, that process is still happening, so what you would see if you didn't move for five seconds is a bunch of 3D "you"s all one after another that were more or less exactly the same. This idea is discussed further in vlogs like
The Flipbook Universe
watch?v=Rc_VliIuPhQ
and Slices of Reality
watch?v=nheaNclVe2Y
and the reason why this "granular nature of spacetime" is important is discussed here:
watch?v=hMLVjFrtq6Q
Rob
10thdim 2 years ago
so time is not analog. i wonder how long we remain in any given frame of time. would it be the plank-time?
detibry 2 years ago
ahhh i c
thats a prety good way of lookin at it, does make sence.
its crazy to think of all the things humans have discovered.. a very curious race xD
toptreeman 2 years ago
the multiple you's in this video keep distracting me from concentrating on what you're saying lol
GeorgeRulesAll 2 years ago
well, if time is only a direction.... then that means if ur a 2 dimension person u wouldnt die as there isnt a direction of time meaning u wouldnt grow old
toptreeman 2 years ago
For a flatlander, time would be one of the two possible directions in the third spatial dimension. Watch "Slices of Reality" for more about this concept of how time is just a series of planck-length slices in the dimension above the one you're examining - which is the way to change from state to state within the current dimension you're looking at.
watch?v=nheaNclVe2Y
Thanks for writing,
Rob
10thdim 2 years ago
the strange thing ive come to realize about time, is that it depends on objects changing, a particle or any other objects must move in order for there to be time, otherwise, there is no recognition that there was any. But another interesting thing is that wherever an object may be, it cannot be truly located at its exact coordinates in space time. Meaning its always an approximation, or a decimal, its never really there
so, how does time flow through objects that dont have finite locations?
Igneous01 2 years ago
That's how it looks when you point a camera at the screen!
cryora 2 years ago
In the 10th dimension, the two directions must be a "ray" of all possible universes in one direction, and a "ray" in the other.
UNIT301092203 2 years ago
In the 8th dimension, the two directions must be a "ray" of possible universes with different but similar initial conditions and another "ray" in the other direction(similar, so that they are attached, and branching, like the 4th dimensions in the 5th dimension). In the 9th dimension, the two directions must be a "ray" of all possible groups of related universes in one direction, and another "ray" in the other(groups of attached universes, like the 6th dimension of attached 5th dimensions.
UNIT301092203 2 years ago
So, if there are two directions for any dimension, then what would be the two directions for the 5th dimension? For every one possible state for our universe, are there two branching possible states? That's my guess. If that were the case, then the number of possible states for our universe(with its unique initial conditions) increases by a multiple of 2 every Planck second, and every universe would look like a triangle or pyramid when viewed from the 8th dimension.
UNIT301092203 2 years ago
Here's the argument this project uses: within the fourth dimension, there is only room for a single past and a single future. An individual's memory appears to bear out the single past idea, and that same line of reasoning leads people to assume the hard determinist viewpoint, that there is only one future as well, and our free will is an illusion.
This project says our "now" is really in the fith dimension, and that the two directions are a "ray" of possible futures, and possible pasts.
10thdim 2 years ago
If you do a search for biocentric tenth dimension you'll find some blogs of mine that don't have youtube videos published yet. These blogs connect to a number of other past discussions that are part of this project, around the mind-blowing idea that the past is just as much a probability space as the future.
Some other vlogs about this:
A Point Within the Omniverse
watch?v=X_Oq-bVkyQc
Scrambled Eggs
watch?v=CFZVd_Ez23g
The Spacetime Tree
watch?v=0L-BfvDYYWg
Thanks for writing!
Rob
10thdim 2 years ago
Yeah, the "ray" of possible futures and possible pasts makes more sense as the two directions for the 5th dimension. The two directions in the 6th dimension must be the "ray" of possible future timelines and the "ray" of possible "past" timelines. In the 7th dimension, there must be a "ray" of possible instances of our universe in the future and a "ray" of possible instances of our universe in the past.
UNIT301092203 2 years ago
so if time is a direction, its traveling on an infinate line, subtracting the posibility of time traveling wormholes? and if its a line its a dimension right?
is it true if time wasnt the fourth dimension, or any dimensions for the matter, then time travel would be possible, or impossible?
Userwastaken 2 years ago
This is where the word "time" can get us into difficulties. Would you say "forward" is a dimension? I would say it makes more sense to say the opposing directions of forward/backward define a dimension more clearly, in the same way that time/anti-time better defines a dimension.
"Time" is the way you change from state to state: time would be in the 3rd dimension for a 2D flatlander. Any process that allows us to "break out of our line" would be a form of time travel.
watch?v=mi2Nh_C8Pzk
Rob
10thdim 2 years ago
what about inward and outward?
angie4josh 2 years ago
Sure. Those are two opposing directions as well, and can be imagined within any spatial dimension.
10thdim 2 years ago
I reckon time is measurement of the movement of space. Which includes ageing - ageing is just molecules changing, and DNA not having instructions to keep it renewing the body. eg calenders and clocks here are just describing where the Earth is in relation to the Sun (and other celestial objects), and what point of its rotation on its axis it is on.
randomlaughingman 2 years ago
so wtf will the 10th demension look like?
FunkyFreshLondonboy 2 years ago
As interesting the video is, I cant help but being so much distracted by the videoeffects :P
Devilsnightforlife 2 years ago
Time has been one of the most fascinating concepts to me ever since I was a small child. I will never grow tired of hearing or reading of countless theories and such.
I love this subject. Thank you Rob!! :)
deezvids 2 years ago
If there are really ten dimensions, then why do I still gotta pay taxes?
Gaowyim 2 years ago 2
hee hee i know, right? :-D
deezvids 2 years ago
Ya right i dought time is only a momory. I can tell that it starts out with tree dimentions and is fused differently by time. The fifth dimention means that something happened at the same time at the same place but was different but i cant seem to understand the sixth dimention
pokemonkiller20 2 years ago
time is nothing more than a memory
spaff61 2 years ago