What you Need is s small meckanical device which is powered by the turning magnets and doing the exactly oposit of what is showing right now....I DO THINK that you got something there....GOOD LUCK...Inform people about Free Energi so that they wake up to all the HIDDEN tecknologies.....
Say No to Gen. Eradiated. Chemically poisening of our children, and weather wars...Before its to late....Gen. Food are poisenes...Thank you for this Video
So the magnets are on top of a Isolation Board which is a varied type of Listerine correct? and the ring in the center, is it magnetic or non-magnetic?
at 8:20 we see you spin the wheel, and then at 8:40, we see it has slowed down because it has been giving energy to your "impulse giving" thing. if you connected the 2 up so that the energy from the spinning wheel went into strengthening the impulse, the wheel would still slow down because no extra energy is going into the wheel. your wheel is creating no extra energy, just using up the energy you gave it with your hand.
And if I may suggest a quantumsynthesis system. That is to say a form of an alchemechanical construction. However, I would not conclude this is to be a form of intelligence, say nothing like a flower. Far less than a concious living perpetuate such as Earth. But I would conclude a harmonic reasoning extraction that involves the capacity to warp electrons. . Is Science Ready? If you search, you will find.
The silver rod you used in your pulse mechanism is called a wind chime in English. Just for your info. Good work so far. I know it can be done. Keep it up.
Ben zelf ook bezig met een experiment waarbij de feedback weer terug wordt gegeven in het apparaat zelf op een andere manier kom graag in contact met je een keer en zou heel graag het apparaat willen zien.
Yes, that is good news. Coler's overunity has been proven under controlled conditions, but somehow never got developed further. There are always replication problems in this branch of science. We do not really know what all the parameters are of this quantummechanical conversion process called overunity.
It's not if someone likes it or not, it is that they do not believe your assumptions.
They try and correct your incorrect conclusions, and you delete them? If you cannot take constructive criticism, then turn the commenting off. Otherwise all you get is agreement by neophites, not a true measure of your experiment.
@JRBeaman As you say it is a matter of belief in your hypothesis. Like and dislike I do not care about. I have no conclusions before there is proof. I experiment. And don't patronize me.
Just because your hand moves a little and the wheel moves more doesn't make it over-unity. Your hand is providing more force and the power you put in with your hand is greater than what you will get out of the wheel.
You guys are repeating yourselves, The point here is to define the concept of energy properly in such a way that we have a formula for coverting vacuum energy into kinetic energy. What you see here is just the rotor principle, not the engagement in a overuniy setup. I explore all of that in my later video's. This is just the beginning. So first check my account and then tell me what you think.
"'look, I can spin a magnet. It should go on spinning forever, but for some strange reason that is beyond my comprehension it stops spinning. I have a concept that the laws of physics can be somehow broken, so that conclusion is sufficient to prove my theory. Unfortunately, these darn magnets just won't get with the program".
The weaker lay says: I cannot do it, therefore it is not possible. The real scientist says: I cannot do it, therefore I do not know how as yet, but I can give it a try another way. Maybe I;ve overlooked something, etc... So I give it a try. I persevere and do not give up. Quantum mechanics and other modern physics theories support this kind of thinking. It is unusual, but it is not foolish. So are you the weaker lay or the real scientist? That is the question of character here.
So what exactly are you trying to figure out? There is 6000 years of experimenting with magnets, what new and improved method are you going to come up with? If you aren't trying for perpetual motion what is it you think will happen?
I am testing a hierarichal particle theory in which all of creation meterial and spiritual sprouts from a single basic entity. The material half develops from the ether. The spiritual half from its counterpart: consciousness. The physical element of space energy is the relative of time which in quatummechanical form is what I try to convert. with magnetism and inertia. That should be possible because that is the way the universe manifests. I am simply testing this theory of a relative ether.
this is not overunity...... you are certainly not getting more energy than the energy you spend by moving your hand (because you ARE moving your hand...) If the magnet was completely still, nothing would move...
Certainly, and that's why I try to create a loop to catch the vibration that will define the time energy of space. That is a theory, I know, and this is an experiment into the possibility of overunity you should know. I just demonstarte the rotor that is most efficient in reponding in such a setup, okay?
You are not getting overunity, as you claim. Calculate your forces.
I'd love to see your proof of concept. I will bet that it won't work.
You are not doing anything with gravitons, you are dealing with magnetic fields. You are mixing up your terms. Gravitons refers to gravity, not magnetism.
Your idea won't work, but continue trying if you wish. I'd love to see the working mechanism, but I won't hold my breath waiting.
have you found a way to mount it in a way so it doesnt equalize? I think thats the hardest thing to figure out. alot of things can slow it down, like drag and friction
perdi 9 minutos de mi vida viendo esta mugre.....esto no funciona, se mueve solo por un desbalance de los campos magneticos, si el iman de arriba no se mueve el sistema llega a un estado de equilibrio y se detiene.
Translation: 9 minutes of my life seeing this dirt ..... this does not work, only moves by imbalance of the magnetic fields, if the magnet of above does not move the system arrives at an equilibrium state and it pauses.
Answer: that is why I call this thing IPMM: intelligence is needed to make a feedback system of pulsing the stator with gravity or inertia, s that there is a self-runner. This thus is an experiment. Success is not guaranteed. Sorry. No illusions today...
and i thank when people say oh this does not exzist well that because thay have been tout convintional seaince we know the insider part of it that is not in the books because money motivation how thank if everyone had one of thease things how would the power companeys make money this technolgey exists it just where to find the infromation if i knew if the excat information i would broad cast it all over the internet show videos oh you name it
there are 2 types of scieance conventional scieance and insider scieance stuff that is eather suppresed insiderley or just not put in books by money motive there is a exact formela that has to be faced if the formela is not right the motor will not work as someone has not fugured the relistics and broad cased them yet
Correct. There is more knowledge and science about this than is formally admitted. But instead of telling us how clumsy we really are with this, we are all controlled with the poltics of standard time manipulation to believe in working for the money. That is how the powers operate. Bad for science and difficult to progress with. Thus I put my clock to the sundial and the rest is bullshit. see my site theorderoftime.
We expect the conversion of vacuum energy into kinetic energy with the help of magnets. That's it. The know how is confounded though in replicating Johnson, Finsrud and other inventors.
So how much energy is in a vacuum? There is no vacuum on earth, unless extreme energy is spent to create it. What happens when the magnetic energy is at equilibrium and no more vacuum energy is able to be removed from the system? Are there any diagrams to show how this is going to work?
There is air and there is space. You want to separate space with its energtic properties from the air. Think man! Both co-exist at the same place in the atmosphere. There is no air without space, How can you think like that? You cannot suck away space, but may engage with its energy like every heavenly body does. .... Diagrams.... take a telescope and see everything running on that time energy of space. Are you convinced now or do you need psychopharmaca? Drugs is the carreer of people in denial
First of all, the presence of air has nothing to do with anything but friction.
Second, "everything running on that time energy of space" only has energy because it *starts* with a HUGE amount of potential energy (such as a star) and, in fact, eventually burns out. Entropy is a fact of physics. Your chakra engine cannot exist in the same fashion because it does not *currently* contain vast amounts of potential energy.
Really? free energy? Why hasn't obama demanded free energy magnets be set up everywhere and we can shut down the power plants? Where can I get free energy magnets? How much power will they put out? Can I run my house off them? Tell me more.
Well, the problem is that we have several cases, examples, that show magnets doing work. Look for Mylow, Johnson, Bedini, Finsrud and Konzen (see my videos and others). The problem is that replications as yet have not lead to an unequivocal formulation of the operating principle. Therefore science sticks to the old paradigm and nothing happens. I push that envelope and try to arrive at the proper logic for a working device. This is the edge of science, I investigate it to find closure in this.
Actually, magnets by themselves can not do work. All they do is attract or repel similar charges or attract certain metals. Work is defined as a force times a distance so a magnet would have to be approached by something foreign to it to have it apply force, but the foreign object has to be moved close to the magnet or the magnet brought close to the object.
You reason from what you learned in school, not from what is found in individual cases of research. As I said, there are numerous examples of inventors finding all kinds of overunity effects dealing with magnets. Do research and then speak again here. I am not your teacher, am I? Be your own. Think of gravity or inertia pulses to keep magnets in action. It has against odds been done but the problem is in the replication. We do not exactly know all the conditions. There ar too many unknowns.
Let's see.... gravity or inertia pulses are adding energy to the system and so it's not really over unity, right? Add friction and it's under unity, right?
The idea is that a combination of fundamental conservative forces leads to a dynamic setup catching time energy. Space energy is defined as consisting of forward (outward) and backward (inward) time energy. We try to catch this energy with a magnetic setup.
BWAHAHA!!! I never get tired of watching this crap. You put in your energy, from your hand. It will turn for longer, if you just leave it alone and let it run down.
haha very true just like when poeple say "Free energy" when they use magnets brought from a shop, concidering the amout of voltage through iron ore to create the magents is more than they will get out of the magents, and repelling 2 magnets minimixed the life of a magnet to 4-5 years. If you want real free energy look into earth poles, and have 1 km3 peice of land LOL
Gentlemen, the problem is that we have examples of devices that do work in this line of research. I know very well that my hand must stop deliverig input and that the magnetic setup must be selfsustaining. I'm not crazy. Remember I do an experiment here into the possibility of overunity of magnets , I never said I achieved.
Have you ever thought of using lasers and magnets? How limited is your budget? With the US government's billions spent every year on research you think they might have stumbled onto free energy from magnets. But keep trying.
No, but an Interesting idea. But If you have an original idea, why don't you have your own original experiment instead of asking me? The bystander knows it all, but the real one does the work. Cynicism is a mental condition, or a form of laziness, or a depression. You have to believe in a theory in order to test. Experiment is the way to progress with physics, not just theory and complacency. And yes, progress is difficult with the ether we cannot prove but by the success of such an experiment.
So applying the 3 laws of thermodynamics is 'lazy or depression'? Say you do the impossible and actually invent a perpetual motion machine, wouldn't the power grow exponentially and destroy the machine, then the earth itself? How big would this machine have to be to be able to siphon off enough 'overunity' energy' to produce usable energy? Seems like it takes forever to make the magnets spin to begin with.
I have not achieved this, but others have. So i keep trying until we have something that is easily replicable for all. A schoolboy design so to say. Acelleration in this kind of setup usually meets a limit defined by the distance of the magnets relative to their strength and the inertial mass. The law of conservation does not apply when we are converting one form of energy (space energy) into another (kinetic energy). Next we can power a load and generate electricity from the kinetic energy.
["The law of conservation does not apply when we are converting one form of energy (space energy) into another (kinetic energy)."
Please elaborate. I assume you have misspoken because the law of conservation *always* applies.]
Wrong, the conservation of energy always applies between forms of energy. Re-read the basic laws that govern our universe and the interaction of energy.
"The law of conservation does not apply when we are converting one form of energy (space energy) into another (kinetic energy)."
mahammadabba said: "... the conservation of energy always applies between forms of energy." (hey, I just said that)
You got it! Here we have a magnetic energy form converted to kinetic. In the simplest terms, the total amount of ALL forms of energy in the universe is constant. You don't get to pick and choose.
"Re-read the basic laws that govern our universe and the interaction of energy" Oh sorry where are these written down God obviously forgot to tell me where he put those .
There is more to it than just that the 'overunity' device won't work. Imagine a universe that allows the interaction of magnetic poles to produce energy. There are lots and lots of random interactions in the universe. Some fraction of these would be of the magical kind than makes energy. This would lead to a universe in which no matter could clump together, the temperature would be extremely high and obviously we wouldn't exist. It is a darn good thing they don't work.
you made so many mistakes "explaining" this i wounldn't know where to start. This is not "overunity". You spin the rotor by your HAND and THAT energy is transfered to the "pulse" thing you hold via the magnetic field. HANDenergy=ROTORenergy+PULSEUNITenergy+heat(friction).
You just bounce energy between rotor and pulse thingy
I have better ones with a real story script. This video is more for people who are tired of beautiful movies that add nothing to our knowledge. See the rest of my video's!
thankyou this is a great video and i am very intrested in your work, also i would just like to help you out as the 'sound staff' you mentioned comes from what in english we call a wind-chime
This is all prototype development until we have a self-runner. Till then you have to wait for commercial offers. This is open source, anyone may offer you a spinner like this to experiment with. No patents are claimed. But of course you can do what I do and follow with the risk of going astray with me. Science is trial and error. From errors we learn, It takes courage to face that. Some even get angry about scientific procedures. But they are not real scientists of course. Doubt is a lead.
Fast spinning will only deliver energy if you manage to 'pinch the magnetic flask' as Bedini calls it, or when you manage to draw vacuum energy. Only then is a fast spin productive. To raise this effect is a matter of engaging gravity and feedback as we learn from Finsrud. But he has a slow spinner. So two things need to be done: improve on the Finsrud concept so that it spins faster, Second to implement an effective gravity feedback. I am engaged in this process now and will keep you posted.
I am going to try to make this, except with an electric motor, and maybe a motor running the neodynium magnet and see what happens? What if I were to off center the neodynium magnet in its spin, do you think it would work?
Great! That would be interesting indeed. Yes the stator needs to spin in a small circle - at the inner rim of the magnet disc - to drive the rotor optimally. The question is: does the disc deliver enough energy to make that little circle? That was my question from the beginning! It would be great if you give it a try. Keep me posted!
how much each do these things cost, I have a small amount of magnets on a device i made however i am only able to acheive spin when i spin it off center with my hand, when i try to replicate it with a motor it does not work as well, I haven't given it much time but I think I prefer your design.
Yes the minimum i did was with six arms with each moon consisting of eleven magnets But seven or eight gives a better coverage and smoother respons. Remember to tape the moons asymmetrical with 5 to the left and six to the right coming down. Such moons make the best fit. Also six to seven extra magnets to cover the distances between the moons at the edge make a smoother respons from a feedbackstator possible. There will be vibrations otherwise. Maybe you can get them for a dollar each. Tops100$.
O yeah, mind to get the thick ones (6x23x10mm), there are also kitchen cabinet locks that offer flat ones with a hole in them, They are less suitable. Tell them apart not to waste your money on stuff you can't use. Maybe you can also mass order them with a magnet seller you can find on the internet. Never tried that. Could be cheaper. I slowly built my collection.
One thing that I liked about this. The magnets are setup different than other peoples. I think its worth wild to work on. Try adding a pendulum swing off the side from the magnet you use in your hand to off set the force. Like you said stay away from electronics for your build. Study the mechanical parts and function of a Stirling engine to off set the system.
I've been testing these things and am now in the process of engaging the pendulum. It is design number 7 i work on now. Number six was insufficient to produce much effect. Gravity is a wealk force, so that requires more skill and balancing. See for IPMM 6: watch?v=E9GucVwc36Q
well, make it happen, then we talk. "Even if.." is not a starting point. What i saw in the video is: you apply a pulse with your hand to your wheel, than another, aso.. and of course the wheel speeds up, but you use your hand to bring more energy to your wheel..
The drive works alright, but to build it into a force control setup that will prove overunity is somethig else. Magnetism on itself does not deliver energy, the pulse needs to be controlled by a second force. The question is : can that be another natural force like gravity for instance? Can we catch the time of the living universe with a machine at the level of magnetism and gravity?
The problem is that quantum mechanics have refuted some of Newtons basic impossiblities. The point with a magnet motor is that is disproves the Newtonian perspective as ignorant. Space is energetic so quantummechanics concert, they call it 'quantum foam'. A sea of energy that can be addressed with a smart setup. There is a known QM effect relating to closed magnetic loops: the Aharonov-bohm effect (see wikipedia). Really, science does not understand everything about this matter, they still look.
Don't judge too quickly, this cakra-drive can be part of a loop that does work. On itself clearly my pulsing hand is needed. But together with a controller managing another basic force of nature there are ways as others before me have proven. (see my other vids)
This is very real, and similar to mine. Mine disintegrated because I didn't control the rpm's. It was made of Aluminum and Styrofoam. The next one will work. PRO
You have totally butchered the meaning of the term "over-unity". Unity means that you get out exactly the same amount that you put in. Over-unity means that you get out more than you put in. The fact that the wheel stops means that you have LESS than unity. If over-unity were possible, people would be driving around with propellers mounted on their cars and would shut down the engine after they got it going because the propeller would keep it going. Why don't we see these? The don't work!!
That is why this is called an experiment, i never said that the definite proof of OU is delivered yet, please study the other files if you care really.
you also dont see electric and hydrogen powered cars everywhere do you? its because the oil companies know that if free energy was released onto the public, they would loose all of the power they possess.
I believe you are referring to the amazing sprawl and huge expanse we call the USA where it's literally a pain in the ass to travel thousands of miles in a miniature car.
Also, "giant jeep?" That's practically an oxymoron.
Yeah, this is over-thought, I think. As I say, why not create the wheel itself, the plate upon which the magnets rest, a little lopsided. That way it will pulse an arm holding a magnet for you.
In an advanced system you could ratchet it in such a way so that, with speed, it adjusts properly to pulse and desired location.
my intuition is telling me that is you create a second disk without the opposite yellow magnet so simply a gap, make it a fixed disk place the spining disk (which you already have) ontop of this fixed disk with the gap and spin it, it would go on forever...
yes two discs double the effect. Something like that could very well work. The gate control is essential in that endeavor. I allways say: follow your intuition, viz, try it yourself, and I will keep this option in mind also.
Then the thing arrests, yes, The art of this design is to catch the unrest inherent to the universe. To create such a balance that the universe answers with: impossible. That is the overunity limit beyond which there is selfrunning capacity and it requires some kind of balancing and tuning mechanical and magnetic that is advanced engineering, a type of engineering humanity has neglected for long.
I run some round cheap magnets in thar form, but the neodimium magnet ruin the other magnets when is so close... what kind of mag did you use 4 the chakra weel?
For the wheel I use, as I exolain in vid nr 1, snapper magnets from kitchen cabinets (avaiabe in any goor hardware store). Eleven per moon. Shielding is not necessary. The neodumium rod (a round one) must not be larger than the inner center. It must be placed on the rim to have an optimal run.
there is somebody in there backyard shed now powering the home with overunity.they would never show it to the world....and that is ashame regards neil
Dear anandaadhar why dont you try to position the moons one sount and one north and see what happenes
salvinod 8 months ago
@salvinod I tried all that, this is the best way to have an easily pulsable rotor.
anandaadhar 8 months ago
keep it up!! very good stuff
wisecollector 9 months ago
What you Need is s small meckanical device which is powered by the turning magnets and doing the exactly oposit of what is showing right now....I DO THINK that you got something there....GOOD LUCK...Inform people about Free Energi so that they wake up to all the HIDDEN tecknologies.....
Say No to Gen. Eradiated. Chemically poisening of our children, and weather wars...Before its to late....Gen. Food are poisenes...Thank you for this Video
Ebdan88 1 year ago
So the magnets are on top of a Isolation Board which is a varied type of Listerine correct? and the ring in the center, is it magnetic or non-magnetic?
Aeonwarrior9520 1 year ago
@Aeonwarrior9520 See my later vids I don't use that ri9ng anymore. I use another type of plate material too.
anandaadhar 8 months ago
at 8:20 we see you spin the wheel, and then at 8:40, we see it has slowed down because it has been giving energy to your "impulse giving" thing. if you connected the 2 up so that the energy from the spinning wheel went into strengthening the impulse, the wheel would still slow down because no extra energy is going into the wheel. your wheel is creating no extra energy, just using up the energy you gave it with your hand.
Leolmlr 1 year ago
And if I may suggest a quantumsynthesis system. That is to say a form of an alchemechanical construction. However, I would not conclude this is to be a form of intelligence, say nothing like a flower. Far less than a concious living perpetuate such as Earth. But I would conclude a harmonic reasoning extraction that involves the capacity to warp electrons. . Is Science Ready? If you search, you will find.
Kimble275 1 year ago
If I may suggest over unity to be as inverting the mirror of God.
Kimble275 1 year ago
@ greenlivingitup . com it shows how to build a free energy device with magnets
DieTheDeath 2 years ago
Blah Blah Blah...You don't know the difference between force and work.
iamauen 2 years ago
Comment removed
iamauen 2 years ago
The silver rod you used in your pulse mechanism is called a wind chime in English. Just for your info. Good work so far. I know it can be done. Keep it up.
Niache34 2 years ago
Ben zelf ook bezig met een experiment waarbij de feedback weer terug wordt gegeven in het apparaat zelf op een andere manier kom graag in contact met je een keer en zou heel graag het apparaat willen zien.
Ray
RayJoel2007 2 years ago
Je bent welkom.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
Good
alcadio78 2 years ago
leex))
pcf1ru 2 years ago
i guess what you're trying to do is a "coler" device.
the british government released plans to build it a few month ago including etailed plans for the electric circuits.
maybe you like it, since it has a solution to bridge this overunity gap, and best of all, it's proven.
ICgraFX 2 years ago
Yes, that is good news. Coler's overunity has been proven under controlled conditions, but somehow never got developed further. There are always replication problems in this branch of science. We do not really know what all the parameters are of this quantummechanical conversion process called overunity.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
really interesting, ncie, keep it up.
Elgansayer 2 years ago
(continuation of first comment below)throw in words like... autoeroticexfixiation, antidisestablishmentarianism &
Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious! Then, at least people may laugh at your BS
ItchynScratchy123 2 years ago
Insuts will be deleted, if you don't like it, then why bother?
anandaadhar 2 years ago
@anandaadhar
It's not if someone likes it or not, it is that they do not believe your assumptions.
They try and correct your incorrect conclusions, and you delete them? If you cannot take constructive criticism, then turn the commenting off. Otherwise all you get is agreement by neophites, not a true measure of your experiment.
JRBeaman 1 year ago
@JRBeaman As you say it is a matter of belief in your hypothesis. Like and dislike I do not care about. I have no conclusions before there is proof. I experiment. And don't patronize me.
anandaadhar 1 year ago
Just because your hand moves a little and the wheel moves more doesn't make it over-unity. Your hand is providing more force and the power you put in with your hand is greater than what you will get out of the wheel.
The word you were looking for is 'wind chime'.
sjh7132 2 years ago
You guys are repeating yourselves, The point here is to define the concept of energy properly in such a way that we have a formula for coverting vacuum energy into kinetic energy. What you see here is just the rotor principle, not the engagement in a overuniy setup. I explore all of that in my later video's. This is just the beginning. So first check my account and then tell me what you think.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
"'look, I can spin a magnet. It should go on spinning forever, but for some strange reason that is beyond my comprehension it stops spinning. I have a concept that the laws of physics can be somehow broken, so that conclusion is sufficient to prove my theory. Unfortunately, these darn magnets just won't get with the program".
mahammadabba 2 years ago
The weaker lay says: I cannot do it, therefore it is not possible. The real scientist says: I cannot do it, therefore I do not know how as yet, but I can give it a try another way. Maybe I;ve overlooked something, etc... So I give it a try. I persevere and do not give up. Quantum mechanics and other modern physics theories support this kind of thinking. It is unusual, but it is not foolish. So are you the weaker lay or the real scientist? That is the question of character here.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
So what exactly are you trying to figure out? There is 6000 years of experimenting with magnets, what new and improved method are you going to come up with? If you aren't trying for perpetual motion what is it you think will happen?
mahammadabba 2 years ago
I am testing a hierarichal particle theory in which all of creation meterial and spiritual sprouts from a single basic entity. The material half develops from the ether. The spiritual half from its counterpart: consciousness. The physical element of space energy is the relative of time which in quatummechanical form is what I try to convert. with magnetism and inertia. That should be possible because that is the way the universe manifests. I am simply testing this theory of a relative ether.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
hmmm.....
good luck with that.
mahammadabba 2 years ago
this is not overunity...... you are certainly not getting more energy than the energy you spend by moving your hand (because you ARE moving your hand...) If the magnet was completely still, nothing would move...
rouketos 2 years ago
Certainly, and that's why I try to create a loop to catch the vibration that will define the time energy of space. That is a theory, I know, and this is an experiment into the possibility of overunity you should know. I just demonstarte the rotor that is most efficient in reponding in such a setup, okay?
anandaadhar 2 years ago
You are not getting overunity, as you claim. Calculate your forces.
I'd love to see your proof of concept. I will bet that it won't work.
You are not doing anything with gravitons, you are dealing with magnetic fields. You are mixing up your terms. Gravitons refers to gravity, not magnetism.
Your idea won't work, but continue trying if you wish. I'd love to see the working mechanism, but I won't hold my breath waiting.
UnderManiac 2 years ago 2
pulse
AndersonRacing44 2 years ago
this is the future dude! gz!
zreticoli 2 years ago
have you found a way to mount it in a way so it doesnt equalize? I think thats the hardest thing to figure out. alot of things can slow it down, like drag and friction
tagaEskinita 2 years ago
No success yet, but I keep trying to find a way to harness this effect. Subscribe please, I post what I have found.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
The biggest problem is that the average torque is zero. This means that even a very tiny drag will stop the rotor over time.
knowledgemonger 2 years ago
perdi 9 minutos de mi vida viendo esta mugre.....esto no funciona, se mueve solo por un desbalance de los campos magneticos, si el iman de arriba no se mueve el sistema llega a un estado de equilibrio y se detiene.
rsalas2006 2 years ago
Translation: 9 minutes of my life seeing this dirt ..... this does not work, only moves by imbalance of the magnetic fields, if the magnet of above does not move the system arrives at an equilibrium state and it pauses.
Answer: that is why I call this thing IPMM: intelligence is needed to make a feedback system of pulsing the stator with gravity or inertia, s that there is a self-runner. This thus is an experiment. Success is not guaranteed. Sorry. No illusions today...
anandaadhar 2 years ago
and i thank when people say oh this does not exzist well that because thay have been tout convintional seaince we know the insider part of it that is not in the books because money motivation how thank if everyone had one of thease things how would the power companeys make money this technolgey exists it just where to find the infromation if i knew if the excat information i would broad cast it all over the internet show videos oh you name it
stingray300m 2 years ago
Study my pages on this subject at theorderoftime
anandaadhar 2 years ago
there are 2 types of scieance conventional scieance and insider scieance stuff that is eather suppresed insiderley or just not put in books by money motive there is a exact formela that has to be faced if the formela is not right the motor will not work as someone has not fugured the relistics and broad cased them yet
stingray300m 2 years ago
Correct. There is more knowledge and science about this than is formally admitted. But instead of telling us how clumsy we really are with this, we are all controlled with the poltics of standard time manipulation to believe in working for the money. That is how the powers operate. Bad for science and difficult to progress with. Thus I put my clock to the sundial and the rest is bullshit. see my site theorderoftime.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
This won't really be a true scam until Dennis Lee adds it to his hho/perpetual motion ripoffs.
mahammadabba 2 years ago
He won't, this is honest and no make belief, just 'make- experiment' until we have our theory confirmed...
anandaadhar 2 years ago
What would confirm your theory? What ultimate goal is expected? Is it power derived from this system without any power input?
mahammadabba 2 years ago
We expect the conversion of vacuum energy into kinetic energy with the help of magnets. That's it. The know how is confounded though in replicating Johnson, Finsrud and other inventors.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
So how much energy is in a vacuum? There is no vacuum on earth, unless extreme energy is spent to create it. What happens when the magnetic energy is at equilibrium and no more vacuum energy is able to be removed from the system? Are there any diagrams to show how this is going to work?
mahammadabba 2 years ago
There is air and there is space. You want to separate space with its energtic properties from the air. Think man! Both co-exist at the same place in the atmosphere. There is no air without space, How can you think like that? You cannot suck away space, but may engage with its energy like every heavenly body does. .... Diagrams.... take a telescope and see everything running on that time energy of space. Are you convinced now or do you need psychopharmaca? Drugs is the carreer of people in denial
anandaadhar 2 years ago
First of all, the presence of air has nothing to do with anything but friction.
Second, "everything running on that time energy of space" only has energy because it *starts* with a HUGE amount of potential energy (such as a star) and, in fact, eventually burns out. Entropy is a fact of physics. Your chakra engine cannot exist in the same fashion because it does not *currently* contain vast amounts of potential energy.
crookedtool 2 years ago
Really? free energy? Why hasn't obama demanded free energy magnets be set up everywhere and we can shut down the power plants? Where can I get free energy magnets? How much power will they put out? Can I run my house off them? Tell me more.
mahammadabba 2 years ago
Well, the problem is that we have several cases, examples, that show magnets doing work. Look for Mylow, Johnson, Bedini, Finsrud and Konzen (see my videos and others). The problem is that replications as yet have not lead to an unequivocal formulation of the operating principle. Therefore science sticks to the old paradigm and nothing happens. I push that envelope and try to arrive at the proper logic for a working device. This is the edge of science, I investigate it to find closure in this.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
Actually, magnets by themselves can not do work. All they do is attract or repel similar charges or attract certain metals. Work is defined as a force times a distance so a magnet would have to be approached by something foreign to it to have it apply force, but the foreign object has to be moved close to the magnet or the magnet brought close to the object.
mahammadabba 2 years ago
You reason from what you learned in school, not from what is found in individual cases of research. As I said, there are numerous examples of inventors finding all kinds of overunity effects dealing with magnets. Do research and then speak again here. I am not your teacher, am I? Be your own. Think of gravity or inertia pulses to keep magnets in action. It has against odds been done but the problem is in the replication. We do not exactly know all the conditions. There ar too many unknowns.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
Let's see.... gravity or inertia pulses are adding energy to the system and so it's not really over unity, right? Add friction and it's under unity, right?
mahammadabba 2 years ago
The idea is that a combination of fundamental conservative forces leads to a dynamic setup catching time energy. Space energy is defined as consisting of forward (outward) and backward (inward) time energy. We try to catch this energy with a magnetic setup.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
BWAHAHA!!! I never get tired of watching this crap. You put in your energy, from your hand. It will turn for longer, if you just leave it alone and let it run down.
The word "dumbass" just doesn't do it justice.
dbuschhorn 2 years ago
haha very true just like when poeple say "Free energy" when they use magnets brought from a shop, concidering the amout of voltage through iron ore to create the magents is more than they will get out of the magents, and repelling 2 magnets minimixed the life of a magnet to 4-5 years. If you want real free energy look into earth poles, and have 1 km3 peice of land LOL
ggohdin 2 years ago
Gentlemen, the problem is that we have examples of devices that do work in this line of research. I know very well that my hand must stop deliverig input and that the magnetic setup must be selfsustaining. I'm not crazy. Remember I do an experiment here into the possibility of overunity of magnets , I never said I achieved.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
Have you ever thought of using lasers and magnets? How limited is your budget? With the US government's billions spent every year on research you think they might have stumbled onto free energy from magnets. But keep trying.
mahammadabba 2 years ago
No, but an Interesting idea. But If you have an original idea, why don't you have your own original experiment instead of asking me? The bystander knows it all, but the real one does the work. Cynicism is a mental condition, or a form of laziness, or a depression. You have to believe in a theory in order to test. Experiment is the way to progress with physics, not just theory and complacency. And yes, progress is difficult with the ether we cannot prove but by the success of such an experiment.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
So applying the 3 laws of thermodynamics is 'lazy or depression'? Say you do the impossible and actually invent a perpetual motion machine, wouldn't the power grow exponentially and destroy the machine, then the earth itself? How big would this machine have to be to be able to siphon off enough 'overunity' energy' to produce usable energy? Seems like it takes forever to make the magnets spin to begin with.
mahammadabba 2 years ago
I have not achieved this, but others have. So i keep trying until we have something that is easily replicable for all. A schoolboy design so to say. Acelleration in this kind of setup usually meets a limit defined by the distance of the magnets relative to their strength and the inertial mass. The law of conservation does not apply when we are converting one form of energy (space energy) into another (kinetic energy). Next we can power a load and generate electricity from the kinetic energy.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
"The law of conservation does not apply when we are converting one form of energy (space energy) into another (kinetic energy)."
Please elaborate. I assume you have misspoken because the law of conservation *always* applies.
crookedtool 2 years ago
["The law of conservation does not apply when we are converting one form of energy (space energy) into another (kinetic energy)."
Please elaborate. I assume you have misspoken because the law of conservation *always* applies.]
Wrong, the conservation of energy always applies between forms of energy. Re-read the basic laws that govern our universe and the interaction of energy.
mahammadabba 2 years ago
"The law of conservation does not apply when we are converting one form of energy (space energy) into another (kinetic energy)."
mahammadabba said: "... the conservation of energy always applies between forms of energy." (hey, I just said that)
You got it! Here we have a magnetic energy form converted to kinetic. In the simplest terms, the total amount of ALL forms of energy in the universe is constant. You don't get to pick and choose.
crookedtool 2 years ago
"Re-read the basic laws that govern our universe and the interaction of energy" Oh sorry where are these written down God obviously forgot to tell me where he put those .
Akzimo 2 years ago
God injected knowledge into Newton and he wrote it down. Now you know.
mahammadabba 2 years ago
Yes, that's a good point. Any amount of
'overunity' could theoretically create
exponentially more energy ultimately
destroying the universe, which leads me to
believe that this method is impractical.
crookedtool 2 years ago
There is more to it than just that the 'overunity' device won't work. Imagine a universe that allows the interaction of magnetic poles to produce energy. There are lots and lots of random interactions in the universe. Some fraction of these would be of the magical kind than makes energy. This would lead to a universe in which no matter could clump together, the temperature would be extremely high and obviously we wouldn't exist. It is a darn good thing they don't work.
knowledgemonger 2 years ago
ang panget ng gawa mu
jamacas 2 years ago
you made so many mistakes "explaining" this i wounldn't know where to start. This is not "overunity". You spin the rotor by your HAND and THAT energy is transfered to the "pulse" thing you hold via the magnetic field. HANDenergy=ROTORenergy+PULSEUNITenergy+heat(friction).
You just bounce energy between rotor and pulse thingy
xaris106 2 years ago
I know al that, please read the comments to this and my other vids.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
i am happy not to watch the holle movie,
very bed.
tesla1961 2 years ago
I have better ones with a real story script. This video is more for people who are tired of beautiful movies that add nothing to our knowledge. See the rest of my video's!
anandaadhar 2 years ago
thankyou this is a great video and i am very intrested in your work, also i would just like to help you out as the 'sound staff' you mentioned comes from what in english we call a wind-chime
00jams00 2 years ago
Hereby I officially appoint you my third sound chime advisor!
anandaadhar 2 years ago
This is all prototype development until we have a self-runner. Till then you have to wait for commercial offers. This is open source, anyone may offer you a spinner like this to experiment with. No patents are claimed. But of course you can do what I do and follow with the risk of going astray with me. Science is trial and error. From errors we learn, It takes courage to face that. Some even get angry about scientific procedures. But they are not real scientists of course. Doubt is a lead.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
Fast spinning will only deliver energy if you manage to 'pinch the magnetic flask' as Bedini calls it, or when you manage to draw vacuum energy. Only then is a fast spin productive. To raise this effect is a matter of engaging gravity and feedback as we learn from Finsrud. But he has a slow spinner. So two things need to be done: improve on the Finsrud concept so that it spins faster, Second to implement an effective gravity feedback. I am engaged in this process now and will keep you posted.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
turn the whole thing upside down to get improved results
soapshouse 2 years ago
Yes, sometime turning things around leads to improvements. I have no illusions about a quick success though.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
I am going to try to make this, except with an electric motor, and maybe a motor running the neodynium magnet and see what happens? What if I were to off center the neodynium magnet in its spin, do you think it would work?
Krawnikal 3 years ago
Great! That would be interesting indeed. Yes the stator needs to spin in a small circle - at the inner rim of the magnet disc - to drive the rotor optimally. The question is: does the disc deliver enough energy to make that little circle? That was my question from the beginning! It would be great if you give it a try. Keep me posted!
anandaadhar 3 years ago
I would need about 70 magnets right?
how much each do these things cost, I have a small amount of magnets on a device i made however i am only able to acheive spin when i spin it off center with my hand, when i try to replicate it with a motor it does not work as well, I haven't given it much time but I think I prefer your design.
Krawnikal 2 years ago
Yes the minimum i did was with six arms with each moon consisting of eleven magnets But seven or eight gives a better coverage and smoother respons. Remember to tape the moons asymmetrical with 5 to the left and six to the right coming down. Such moons make the best fit. Also six to seven extra magnets to cover the distances between the moons at the edge make a smoother respons from a feedbackstator possible. There will be vibrations otherwise. Maybe you can get them for a dollar each. Tops100$.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
O yeah, mind to get the thick ones (6x23x10mm), there are also kitchen cabinet locks that offer flat ones with a hole in them, They are less suitable. Tell them apart not to waste your money on stuff you can't use. Maybe you can also mass order them with a magnet seller you can find on the internet. Never tried that. Could be cheaper. I slowly built my collection.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
One thing that I liked about this. The magnets are setup different than other peoples. I think its worth wild to work on. Try adding a pendulum swing off the side from the magnet you use in your hand to off set the force. Like you said stay away from electronics for your build. Study the mechanical parts and function of a Stirling engine to off set the system.
johnstarr2001 3 years ago
I've been testing these things and am now in the process of engaging the pendulum. It is design number 7 i work on now. Number six was insufficient to produce much effect. Gravity is a wealk force, so that requires more skill and balancing. See for IPMM 6: watch?v=E9GucVwc36Q
anandaadhar 3 years ago
actualy i m kneen to see the real working thing, same as a real anti-gravity device, but i doubt it will happend in my lifetime.
gmankl 3 years ago
We'll never see it if we don't try....what did you dopractically for this matter by the way?
anandaadhar 3 years ago
well, make it happen, then we talk. "Even if.." is not a starting point. What i saw in the video is: you apply a pulse with your hand to your wheel, than another, aso.. and of course the wheel speeds up, but you use your hand to bring more energy to your wheel..
gmankl 3 years ago
'If' is the basic nature of scientific endeavor.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
why and, more importantly, why not is the basic nature of scientific endeavor. If is the stuff of fiction.
dagda825 3 years ago
Also, yes. Popper insisted on conjecture and refutation. We have science theories too. I say explore and discover where we are not certain.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
so far there is nothing that can't be explained, on the "free energy" matter, with newtons laws.
Anyway, good one: "..the drive works, but to make it work as a system is a different matter..".
gmankl 3 years ago
Even if we happen to make a working magnet motor, we can explain it...
anandaadhar 3 years ago
well, thats mechanic here and it doesnt work as claimed. I saw your other vids, they proof my point, anyway good luck with your "foam motor".
gmankl 3 years ago
The drive works alright, but to build it into a force control setup that will prove overunity is somethig else. Magnetism on itself does not deliver energy, the pulse needs to be controlled by a second force. The question is : can that be another natural force like gravity for instance? Can we catch the time of the living universe with a machine at the level of magnetism and gravity?
anandaadhar 3 years ago
@PROOLson, i would be surprised to see a working "magic motor", so far 100% failure!
Newton didn't "invent" the laws of physics, he just put his observation into words.
gmankl 3 years ago
The problem is that quantum mechanics have refuted some of Newtons basic impossiblities. The point with a magnet motor is that is disproves the Newtonian perspective as ignorant. Space is energetic so quantummechanics concert, they call it 'quantum foam'. A sea of energy that can be addressed with a smart setup. There is a known QM effect relating to closed magnetic loops: the Aharonov-bohm effect (see wikipedia). Really, science does not understand everything about this matter, they still look.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
museum of unworkable invention!
gmankl 3 years ago
Don't judge too quickly, this cakra-drive can be part of a loop that does work. On itself clearly my pulsing hand is needed. But together with a controller managing another basic force of nature there are ways as others before me have proven. (see my other vids)
anandaadhar 3 years ago
This is very real, and similar to mine. Mine disintegrated because I didn't control the rpm's. It was made of Aluminum and Styrofoam. The next one will work. PRO
PROOlson 3 years ago
Wind Chimes mate, and thankyou
aaronjenkinson 3 years ago
yes I know that by know, thanks....
anandaadhar 3 years ago
The word that your looking for from the shaft that you mentioned, is a wind chime.
phillipah7 3 years ago
You have totally butchered the meaning of the term "over-unity". Unity means that you get out exactly the same amount that you put in. Over-unity means that you get out more than you put in. The fact that the wheel stops means that you have LESS than unity. If over-unity were possible, people would be driving around with propellers mounted on their cars and would shut down the engine after they got it going because the propeller would keep it going. Why don't we see these? The don't work!!
cncguy05 3 years ago
That is why this is called an experiment, i never said that the definite proof of OU is delivered yet, please study the other files if you care really.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
you also dont see electric and hydrogen powered cars everywhere do you? its because the oil companies know that if free energy was released onto the public, they would loose all of the power they possess.
CondemnedPatriot 3 years ago
I see such cars all the time.
Simply Americans prefer their giant clumsy jeeps rather than normal cars. But .. what can I say - some people just see city roads as mountains.
TheMacrohardCorp 3 years ago
I believe you are referring to the amazing sprawl and huge expanse we call the USA where it's literally a pain in the ass to travel thousands of miles in a miniature car.
Also, "giant jeep?" That's practically an oxymoron.
crookedtool 2 years ago
Yeah, this is over-thought, I think. As I say, why not create the wheel itself, the plate upon which the magnets rest, a little lopsided. That way it will pulse an arm holding a magnet for you.
In an advanced system you could ratchet it in such a way so that, with speed, it adjusts properly to pulse and desired location.
Then the wheel can turn and generate electricity.
DaveDReynolds 3 years ago
see my response at part 2
anandaadhar 3 years ago
my intuition is telling me that is you create a second disk without the opposite yellow magnet so simply a gap, make it a fixed disk place the spining disk (which you already have) ontop of this fixed disk with the gap and spin it, it would go on forever...
Danster82 3 years ago
yes two discs double the effect. Something like that could very well work. The gate control is essential in that endeavor. I allways say: follow your intuition, viz, try it yourself, and I will keep this option in mind also.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
The device in your hand still needs to be firmly mounted. The wheel rotates due do the movements from our hand. Once firmly affixed ........
shubus 4 years ago
Then the thing arrests, yes, The art of this design is to catch the unrest inherent to the universe. To create such a balance that the universe answers with: impossible. That is the overunity limit beyond which there is selfrunning capacity and it requires some kind of balancing and tuning mechanical and magnetic that is advanced engineering, a type of engineering humanity has neglected for long.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
I run some round cheap magnets in thar form, but the neodimium magnet ruin the other magnets when is so close... what kind of mag did you use 4 the chakra weel?
Shielding the undesire MF is a good option
alex681219 4 years ago
For the wheel I use, as I exolain in vid nr 1, snapper magnets from kitchen cabinets (avaiabe in any goor hardware store). Eleven per moon. Shielding is not necessary. The neodumium rod (a round one) must not be larger than the inner center. It must be placed on the rim to have an optimal run.
anandaadhar 4 years ago
The air tinkling word you are looking for is called a "wind chime"!
iain9876 4 years ago
you rock! my friend and i are using this idea show the world how to save itself... all through our science fair. thank you!
dahreeus 4 years ago
Wind chime. :P
DSmith28 4 years ago
there is somebody in there backyard shed now powering the home with overunity.they would never show it to the world....and that is ashame regards neil
MADHELINELLY 4 years ago