Why are Americans (of all people) trying to take away people's PERSONAL life choices? Maybe they would have enjoyed life in the Soviet Union? I guess some people don't know how good they have it until their freedoms are taken away.
That was a really horrible choice of people who go to UNC asheville. I know as a biology student at UNCA, that those pictures were inaccurate along with all pictures that make a fetus look like a smaller version of an adult. As far as choice goes, my personal opinion is that abortion is better than a child being raised in an abusive household, or where they turn to gang violence or prostitution, because they live without any money or any support to get a good education. That's the real issue.
"if everyone else can come and give there opinion why shouldn't we?" .........is everyone showing graphic photos of dead people? no? well i think you found your answer.
I think the issue of the story became whether the pictures were obscene themselves, posted in a public space to students who didn't expect it, not the underlying, larger issue of whether abortion is right or wrong nor the silly assertion that abortion is genocide.
@LastUnicornEver XD cornrows, i believe those are called dreadlocks. Also, dead bodies are TOO MUCH for some people, and have even been know to cause panic attacks, vomiting etc. They belong outside federal buildings and abortion clinics not where children or those with health issues to see. and the only reason i say outside abortion clinics is because that is your aim, your goal, and is your target audience and unfortunately is your right. and i wont comment on the last, it would be futile.
They don't know how one can compare planned abortionhood to nazis or the kkk.
They really are idiots, PPs founder was an admitted nazi supporter. You should listen to some of the interviews with her, here on youtube. PP was created to get rid of the undesirables as uegenicists see them.
The girl that said "I have done enough reasearch for myself I don't need people putting it in my face."
I guess you really haven't done that much research to see the "Reality" of abortion and still hold your opinion. If you look at these images and say that they are offensive to you and continue to hold your position of PRO-Death...Well...there is nothing on earth that can help you.
Individually, one can be against having abortions themselves, and they can find those pictures offensive, whilst at the same time agree that it isnt their right to push their personal beliefs on others.
Pro-lifers dont understand that nobody cares if you are pro-life! Just dont tell my girl friend/wife/sister/etc. what to do with her body, just worry about your own.
I guess I cant expect intellect from someone who says pro-choice is pro-death.
So your saying it was wrong when people"pushed their personal beliefs"on hitler when he was killing the Jews?
"I am personally against it but it is ok if they choose to do it"
So we should have done nothing when Hitler was killing the Jews because to him Jews were not human being either?
No we do not push are own personal beliefs on anyone-We only stand for the dignity of all human life from conception to natural death. We are only stating the facts of what an abortion is-Killing a child
I'm assuming you didn't read anything past the first half of my comment. I said, don't tell my girl friend/wife/sister/etc. what to do with THEIR BODIES.
Read carefully please. The Jews were not part of Hitlers body. Hither had no right to do what he did.
If you're against abortion fine, that is your CHOICE. Make sure that you or your lover doesn't have an abortion. Quit trying to tell your neighbor what they should be doing with their body--it's none of your buisness.
No the life is connected to the mother, it is part of the mothers body. It is a group of cells that have no thoughts, no emotions, doesn't even feel pain until the 28th week after conception.
And see, here is the dilemma. I think it's part of the mother, and you think it's separate. So, who should get their way? Both of us.
-You choose to think it's a completely different person, and don't have an abortion.
-My girlfriend will do what she wants to her body.
No its not part of the mother even prior to the 28th week. There is no debate on when life begins. It is fact it begins at contraception. look it up. A brain does not define being a human or not. It is a human and therefore it is a homicide through an abortion that kills it. It is sharing her body but it is not part of her's. Its the same for Siamese twins. Two individuals attached to each other.
Life begins with sperm cells, let's call masturbation murder too, shall we? I never said life didn't begin at conception. I would agree.
However, that 'life' is still a part of the mothers body. Don't believe me, search "umbilical cord". You might find out something that blows your mind.
Now, the question lies on whose rights are more important. The child's 'right to live' or the mothers 'right to choose', I say it's the mothers. If you disagree, that's fine with me, that's why I'm pro choice.
Also, so you just acknowledged it is killing and the only thing that justifies it is a women's right to choose. So on that, would you say a woman should be able to kill her child post nately up until a certain age if she "chooses" to?
I don't know many children that are still connected to their mothers body post nately.
I think the current laws are fine, women have the right to do as they wish with their own body. Once the baby is born, the women still has the right to do what she wants with her own body but that doesn't affect the new born because the new born isn't a part of the mothers body. Thus, the mother no longer has rights on the child's life. At that point, adoption or raising the kid is the only options.
Yes, but like two Siamese twins, they're still two individuals. The fetus is not part of the mother's body. It is its own body. They are just attached, there is no debate on that in science. The argument is the mother came first and therefore she should have the right to kill the fetus. Even though it is a living individual of it's own.
"It is only if human life is respected from conception to death that the ethics of peace is also possible and credible," concluded the Pope. "It is only then that non-violence can express itself in every direction; only then that we truly welcome creation, and only then that we can arrive at true justice." Pope Benedict XVI
Why are Americans (of all people) trying to take away people's PERSONAL life choices? Maybe they would have enjoyed life in the Soviet Union? I guess some people don't know how good they have it until their freedoms are taken away.
Safia1117 8 months ago
That was a really horrible choice of people who go to UNC asheville. I know as a biology student at UNCA, that those pictures were inaccurate along with all pictures that make a fetus look like a smaller version of an adult. As far as choice goes, my personal opinion is that abortion is better than a child being raised in an abusive household, or where they turn to gang violence or prostitution, because they live without any money or any support to get a good education. That's the real issue.
fireofinfinity 10 months ago
@fireofinfinity So you're saying hardship justifies homicide?
SuperfaithMinistries 8 months ago
thank you, genocide awareness project, and all serving in it!!!
Phrasester 1 year ago
"if everyone else can come and give there opinion why shouldn't we?" .........is everyone showing graphic photos of dead people? no? well i think you found your answer.
lambchopclmt 1 year ago
I think the issue of the story became whether the pictures were obscene themselves, posted in a public space to students who didn't expect it, not the underlying, larger issue of whether abortion is right or wrong nor the silly assertion that abortion is genocide.
arhillberry 1 year ago
I am less than impressed by cornrows & pierced lip blonde girl. "At noon, when I first wake up ..." > revealing.
Why not reason from A to B that "ABORTION is a bit too much" instead of saying, "The PICTURES are a bit much for me."?
The rightness or wrongness of a person's actions is "completely relative"?
Whoa! Please don't go to grad school.
LastUnicornEver 1 year ago
@LastUnicornEver XD cornrows, i believe those are called dreadlocks. Also, dead bodies are TOO MUCH for some people, and have even been know to cause panic attacks, vomiting etc. They belong outside federal buildings and abortion clinics not where children or those with health issues to see. and the only reason i say outside abortion clinics is because that is your aim, your goal, and is your target audience and unfortunately is your right. and i wont comment on the last, it would be futile.
lambchopclmt 1 year ago
The pro aborts in this video are typical. Idiots.
They don't know how one can compare planned abortionhood to nazis or the kkk.
They really are idiots, PPs founder was an admitted nazi supporter. You should listen to some of the interviews with her, here on youtube. PP was created to get rid of the undesirables as uegenicists see them.
ThomasJS1 1 year ago
"at noon when i first wake up and go to class"
kendall cramer.
FAIL
tootergray34 2 years ago
LOVE LIFE YOUR MOTHER DID !!!!!
preachertom1 2 years ago
Let's err on the side of caution and NOT kill babies.
anarqist 2 years ago
Abortion is legalized murder...I seriously don't see a difference between the two.
HarryLeTroisieme 3 years ago
Can't people see that...
The PRO-Life side is so peacefull and
The PRO-Death side has so much confusion.
The girl that said "I have done enough reasearch for myself I don't need people putting it in my face."
I guess you really haven't done that much research to see the "Reality" of abortion and still hold your opinion. If you look at these images and say that they are offensive to you and continue to hold your position of PRO-Death...Well...there is nothing on earth that can help you.
matthewbrianlawrence 3 years ago
See and this is where 'pro-lifers' are confused.
Individually, one can be against having abortions themselves, and they can find those pictures offensive, whilst at the same time agree that it isnt their right to push their personal beliefs on others.
Pro-lifers dont understand that nobody cares if you are pro-life! Just dont tell my girl friend/wife/sister/etc. what to do with her body, just worry about your own.
I guess I cant expect intellect from someone who says pro-choice is pro-death.
garveya1 2 years ago
So your saying it was wrong when people"pushed their personal beliefs"on hitler when he was killing the Jews?
"I am personally against it but it is ok if they choose to do it"
So we should have done nothing when Hitler was killing the Jews because to him Jews were not human being either?
No we do not push are own personal beliefs on anyone-We only stand for the dignity of all human life from conception to natural death. We are only stating the facts of what an abortion is-Killing a child
matthewbrianlawrence 2 years ago
I'm assuming you didn't read anything past the first half of my comment. I said, don't tell my girl friend/wife/sister/etc. what to do with THEIR BODIES.
Read carefully please. The Jews were not part of Hitlers body. Hither had no right to do what he did.
If you're against abortion fine, that is your CHOICE. Make sure that you or your lover doesn't have an abortion. Quit trying to tell your neighbor what they should be doing with their body--it's none of your buisness.
garveya1 2 years ago
Yes, I did in fact read past the first half of your comment. I was just showing you that we should be concerned about what other people are doing.
As for your main concern" Quit telling your neighbor what they should be doing with their body"
It is our business-And please tell me if it is THEIR BODY how can they have 4 arms 4 legs 2 noses and 4 eyes?
It is not just THEIR BODY-There is another human being that is being formed.
YOUR RIGHTS END AS SOON AS ANOTHER PERSONS RIGHTS BEGIN!
matthewbrianlawrence 2 years ago
No the life is connected to the mother, it is part of the mothers body. It is a group of cells that have no thoughts, no emotions, doesn't even feel pain until the 28th week after conception.
And see, here is the dilemma. I think it's part of the mother, and you think it's separate. So, who should get their way? Both of us.
-You choose to think it's a completely different person, and don't have an abortion.
-My girlfriend will do what she wants to her body.
This is what we call pro-choice.
garveya1 2 years ago
No its not part of the mother even prior to the 28th week. There is no debate on when life begins. It is fact it begins at contraception. look it up. A brain does not define being a human or not. It is a human and therefore it is a homicide through an abortion that kills it. It is sharing her body but it is not part of her's. Its the same for Siamese twins. Two individuals attached to each other.
bcmasta1returns 2 years ago
Life begins with sperm cells, let's call masturbation murder too, shall we? I never said life didn't begin at conception. I would agree.
However, that 'life' is still a part of the mothers body. Don't believe me, search "umbilical cord". You might find out something that blows your mind.
Now, the question lies on whose rights are more important. The child's 'right to live' or the mothers 'right to choose', I say it's the mothers. If you disagree, that's fine with me, that's why I'm pro choice.
garveya1 2 years ago
Comment removed
bcmasta1returns 2 years ago
Sorry, I meant to say, would you say the same for a Siamese twin that kills another?
bcmasta1returns 2 years ago
Also, so you just acknowledged it is killing and the only thing that justifies it is a women's right to choose. So on that, would you say a woman should be able to kill her child post nately up until a certain age if she "chooses" to?
bcmasta1returns 2 years ago
I don't know many children that are still connected to their mothers body post nately.
I think the current laws are fine, women have the right to do as they wish with their own body. Once the baby is born, the women still has the right to do what she wants with her own body but that doesn't affect the new born because the new born isn't a part of the mothers body. Thus, the mother no longer has rights on the child's life. At that point, adoption or raising the kid is the only options.
garveya1 2 years ago
Yes, but like two Siamese twins, they're still two individuals. The fetus is not part of the mother's body. It is its own body. They are just attached, there is no debate on that in science. The argument is the mother came first and therefore she should have the right to kill the fetus. Even though it is a living individual of it's own.
bcmasta1returns 2 years ago
Okay so you were an aborted fetus who knows that it doesn't hurt?
Notababykiller 2 years ago
Okay so you were shot in the head by a serial killer who knows that it doesn't hurt?
bcmasta1returns 2 years ago
fuck* prolife!
genalithium 3 years ago
WOW THANK YOU I NEVER KNEW THAT ABORTION WAS THE KILLING OF A BABBY UNTIL YOU SHOWED ME THOSE PICTURES EVERY YEAR ON THE QUAD.
WAY TO GO SHOCK VALUE 2008
ps your message is stupid and the way you went about it is immature and pathetic.
FUCKING DOUCHEBAGS HOORAY WE'RE ALL GREAT
Silverweed 3 years ago
"It is only if human life is respected from conception to death that the ethics of peace is also possible and credible," concluded the Pope. "It is only then that non-violence can express itself in every direction; only then that we truly welcome creation, and only then that we can arrive at true justice." Pope Benedict XVI
teton99 3 years ago
Thank You for posting this!!!
ThunderPigBlog 3 years ago