The stupidity of the supporters of those laws is beyond any possible imagination. In EVERY debate about the gun laws the gun supporter shows to have zero brains on the matter and usually ignore the crime facts. If you watch the debate between Larry w/e and Maarten van Rossem or the discussions in Bowling Columbine you can easily notice how clueless the gun supporters actually are. Luckily there are quite a few US intellectuals who can make up for the huge amount of idiots in the US. gl Obama
One only has to study the grammer of english to understand that a dependent clause like "a well regulated militia being necesary to a free state" cannot govern (cannot be an in then condition) to the independent clause that follows "the right of the people...shall not be infringed."
The James Madison quote at 1:00 is a hoax. Here's what he ACTUALLY said in Federalist 46:
"....the existence of subordinate GOVERNMENTS, to which the people are attached, and BY WHICH THE MILITIA OFFICERS ARE APPOINTED, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition..."
The idea of using firearms to stand up to this government is, frankly, absurd. Nobody can afford the technology that the government has, and even if they did it would be illegal. So, I believe in setting yourself up for total breakdown of society, and guns are crucial in protecting your property and hunting. Meaning, although it is a good argument in historical theory, I don't think it is a viable one. Our military may not attack us, but an imported one, or perhaps the Obama youth, will.
Exactly, the military could not control Texas, Admiral Yamamoto even once said: "You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be rifle behind each blade of grass."
Don't forget the VC. We bombed the crap out of that nation and just gave up after a few years. All they had were small arms.
People don't seem to realize how expensive it is to maintain an armored division or a flight of aircraft, or a fleet of ships. We only have 22 B-2 stealth bombers in existence because they each cost 1 billion each!
Yes you are right but what would happen IF I say IF another Entity took over our Government through subversion or say USA goes totally Bankrupt IE happening as we speak and foreign Govts buy our country and then RUN it????
The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.
This is what needs to be taught in schools so kids know the true history of this country and realize how important our constitution is!Especially the 2nd amendment!Excellent video!
The stupidity of the supporters of those laws is beyond any possible imagination. In EVERY debate about the gun laws the gun supporter shows to have zero brains on the matter and usually ignore the crime facts. If you watch the debate between Larry w/e and Maarten van Rossem or the discussions in Bowling Columbine you can easily notice how clueless the gun supporters actually are. Luckily there are quite a few US intellectuals who can make up for the huge amount of idiots in the US. gl Obama
Yetze 1 year ago
One only has to study the grammer of english to understand that a dependent clause like "a well regulated militia being necesary to a free state" cannot govern (cannot be an in then condition) to the independent clause that follows "the right of the people...shall not be infringed."
kronosgyros 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The James Madison quote at 1:00 is a hoax. Here's what he ACTUALLY said in Federalist 46:
"....the existence of subordinate GOVERNMENTS, to which the people are attached, and BY WHICH THE MILITIA OFFICERS ARE APPOINTED, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition..."
freatork1 1 year ago
federal troops are not the militia. they are the government. this clause was to protect us from the government troops.
Rico8458 2 years ago 5
today if you try to form a citizen militia the FBI will put you in prison. no president will back you up here today.
Rico8458 2 years ago
The idea of using firearms to stand up to this government is, frankly, absurd. Nobody can afford the technology that the government has, and even if they did it would be illegal. So, I believe in setting yourself up for total breakdown of society, and guns are crucial in protecting your property and hunting. Meaning, although it is a good argument in historical theory, I don't think it is a viable one. Our military may not attack us, but an imported one, or perhaps the Obama youth, will.
Iregretmostofmyposts 2 years ago
"The idea of using firearms to stand up to this government is, frankly, absurd"
The military can't even control Iraq, which is about the size of Texas. Imagine trying to control all 50 states.
strongbadXCP 2 years ago 6
They'd have no problem in NYC. I know because i live here and damn near EVERYONE is more than ready to bow down. Damn shame.
LamontDaGrizzly 2 years ago
Agreed. People would bow down and all of our neighbors would sell us out if we showed any signs of dissent.
Iregretmostofmyposts 2 years ago
Exactly, the military could not control Texas, Admiral Yamamoto even once said: "You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be rifle behind each blade of grass."
molanlabexm15 2 years ago 2
Don't forget the VC. We bombed the crap out of that nation and just gave up after a few years. All they had were small arms.
People don't seem to realize how expensive it is to maintain an armored division or a flight of aircraft, or a fleet of ships. We only have 22 B-2 stealth bombers in existence because they each cost 1 billion each!
CrystalHunter1989 2 years ago
I see what you mean, but look at our revolution! A bunch of farmers took on the whole british army!
JustinBaker2567 2 years ago 2
Yes you are right but what would happen IF I say IF another Entity took over our Government through subversion or say USA goes totally Bankrupt IE happening as we speak and foreign Govts buy our country and then RUN it????
Time to take up Arms.
deltaalpha21074 2 years ago
I'm not a Jew, but where the hell do I sign up?
johnandersonii 2 years ago 10
@johnandersonii What do Jews have to do with Militias?
synn1980 1 year ago
The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.
Thomas Jefferson
gotwake474 2 years ago 8
They meant like the greek.
StoneWallD 2 years ago
Long rifle baby.
StoneWallD 2 years ago 3
"brainwashed TV watchers " words of truth and a understated..
jaxxfat 3 years ago 3
must watch, especially for all those brain washed tv watchers
Siriusluv 3 years ago 10
god bless the 2nd amendment. Show this video in schools!!! and not that U.N. gun hater emotional retarded nonsense that passes for education.
ugotpimp 3 years ago 9
This is what needs to be taught in schools so kids know the true history of this country and realize how important our constitution is!Especially the 2nd amendment!Excellent video!
RavenSpear1 3 years ago 5
excellent!
sonypsx101111 3 years ago 5
Very enlightening!
777DLS777 3 years ago 4
Outstanding
sylop729 3 years ago 3