it actually does also depend in the raquet because each raquet has its different storng points and weaknesses and each speacilize in a different range of shots, say you got a crappy raquet, just because you got the skills dosen't mean your gonna win with it, I myself have used the K Factor K Five and I think its the best out of all the raquets that I have used.
ye im getting that racket as my second racket , i got the pure drive roddick ( old model look i think) not the one he has now .. but nevertheless its awesome !!
i've owned atleast 6 rackets over the last 7 years and have to say that nothing comes anywhere close to the all around, absolute perfection of the kfactor six.one tour. everything else feels shockingly inferior to this. the fed knows what he's doing.
Wilson K six one tour 90 is the best racket i've ever tried. It really provides great control and feeling over the ball. Overall it improved my backhand and forehand. Great racket.
i do prefer the k90 over most rackets, just better for me, however the 90mm makes it more challenging to hit the sweet spot, one of the hardest rackets to use
Listen to all this giberish shite from 2:42 onwards. Nano fibers, sio2 molecules, kontur yolk. Have you ever heard such fuckin' rubbish before? The advert might as well be saying...'Yeah buy this racquet and you will play just like Roger'.. Id like to shoot the cunt that's narrating this.
What is the difference between number 1 and number 2? Nadal kicks Federer's arse, thats what the difference is. Fed may win the odd few but Nadal rules!
Just like that huh? He'd kill him? In other words Nadal may not even bother turning up the way you desribe it. Youre that sure are you? Tell me who will win the French Open this year followed by Wimbledon and the the US Open. If all yur predictions come true then i will remove my comment and reffer to you as the KING! Fair enough?
i said fed would kill nadal on fast courts in his prime which i believe is true as he totally out played him in the 2006 - 2007 masters cup finals and wimby 06... i must admit that nadal is better now then then but fed is not as good now as then.. i think fed will win either us open or no slams this year because its the fastest surface now . the grass at wimby is so slow it plays into the hands of the new bread of tennis players not the likes of fed and doddick ect
i really liked the racket when i first got it but i play on clay all the time, every day. It gets very tiring as for a tennis racket, this is not light. I bought the lite version but that was too light lol. I actually prefer the six-one team. But thats just me
Like I said, a heavy racquet is desirable for those with the requisite technique. Using your body properly, it is not difficult to accelerate a heavier racquet. Of course, if one's technique is poor, they will have trouble with a heavier racquet - this is why beginner's racquets are light. You also have to factor in string tension - fed strings 45-54, which is relatively low for today's frames but just fine for a flexible 90sq inch head like the PS90/K90.
I don't know how RF uses these racquets! They are heavy and don't provide power. They feel horrible! I'm a 4.5-5.0 level player and I play all court and can't imagine using this. I like a little lighter racquet even though I understand the value of having some weight. It looks cool though but I don't know how he competes with it, OR PS using the racquet he did. RF head size is 90 sq in and PS was 85! Crazy. PS was very heavy. Amazing.
You faggot, I'll slap your face if you say that in front of me. Wrong sissy, it is a difficult and heavy racquet to use. I've played for years with heavy, tight strung racquets and I cannot do it anymore. My worst I'm a 4.5 my best a 5.0. Take a hike fool. I've hit with these things and they are tough.
If we meet in person and I underestimate your NTRP rating you'll attack me? Awesome.
I work at a tennis store and have hit with every single non-oversized racquet on the market from Wilson, Prince, Babolat, Head, Yonex, Tecnifibre, and Dunlop.
I work in a tennis shop as well and I teach tennis full-time and do well. I string racquets all the time and I've strung, and played with, almost everything out there. Your comment previously about me was ignorant. Thanks.
hello im 16 and my hight is 1.72. what do you thin about tha ksix one team for me?. or what about the k surge is it confort or heavy?. I wanna learn tennis from zero. Greetings.
it really depends on what u want i a racquet: power, control, feel, or maneuverability. the 6one team is really good 4 control if u like the sweeetspot about the size of a tennis ball. the surge is for a good blend of power y control. odd weight balance tho. i have a kzen con hybrid strings
Don't start with the [K]Six-one because they are really expensive, I would shop around and look for something about 100sq in. because your age and size anything bigger would have too much power and anything smaller because of your skill would cause numerous mis-hits. But most important of all, DEMO DEMO DEMO. You can spent 200$ on Rogers racquet and play like crap. Get what fits you the best.
hola tengo 16 mido 1.72 ... Como creen que me iria con la ksix one team? es muy pesada? O como creen que me iria con la K Surge? que tan pesada o comoda es? ... Quiero empezar en eel tennis desde cero. Saludos.
The K-Six-One-Tour is so fuckin heavy, I would not recommend it to anyone who well advanced in tennis fucking shit its like swinging a tree, which is why im amazed how this guys goes five sets with that thing
I am 14 and I play with that raquet. It's not that heavy when you get used to it. It has much better control and power to me compare to the ncode series raquets
yes my friend bought one and we switched racquets in the middle of the game... so have you noticed the smaller sweetspot? compared to my K-90 Tour is not very manouverable and doesnt have much power at serves...
its just expensive here in the phillipines(the k 6.1 tour) so i cant buy it T_T in america they sell it for $189 but here its 13,500 pesos which is equal to $350+? O_O
I used to use the Pure Drive Roddick which had good power, but was very stiff and it had no feel. Wanted more control, feel, and decent power so I bought the K Factor 6.1 95 and it is way better than the PDR.
lol im the other way around... i switched K-Factor 90 tour to Pure Drive Roddick i mean it wasn´t a bad racquet just that pure control is not my thing it lacked so much power compared to the old wilson hammer titanium and they dont sell those anymore so i found babolat´s pure drive which gave me the POWER i wanted and also the stiffness like a rock!
actually they are selling the same frame with leather grip exactly like federer´s even the bags are exactly like the pros use anti mouisture, but every pro has it´s own way to customize his racquet adding lead tapes to add more weight or balance, increasing grip size, having hybrid strings like polyester as main and natural gut in crosses...
I hav the wilson nCode n4 (Blue one venus won wimbly 05 with) and its great! makes tennis so easy! K factor may be better fr control but ncode is WAYY better for power and demolition of your opponent!!!
And to think that the #1 player in the world would change his racket every time the marketing geniuses decide they need to boost sales? By use two Rodger Federers you know right away that its all smoke and mirrors. There are alledgedly 4 key K "technologies," but in the end your only get K cubed or K^3. So either they are leaving one of the key technologies out, or those advanced "scientists" don't know that cubed means ^3 not ^4.
This video is so funny that Federer himself can barely contain his laughter when he starts talking racket technology/hype, watch his smile. The commercial starts off by asking whats the diff between #1 and #2, even suggesting that the answer has anything to do with your racket is absurd.
Hi supershroom164. I am regentville the guy who posted this video. I actually purchased the the K61 Team and did a review about it on my tennis blog. Type a search on "regentville tennis blog" on google and you'll find my site. Hope this helps.
Well, if your wrist hurts it's probably because of the grip size and the weight of the racket, if you want to buy this, you have to make sure you have a strong wrist. the fram is 4/4 and the weight is a lot heavier than the N6.1, but yes, i like this racket for control and the light frame
I swear, all of these Wilson commercials could be put in movie theaters and make everyone believe for a few seconds it's a movie, not a commercial.
But how the hell do they get 64% more control from 4 cubed when the 4 is "4 key technologies"? I mean, it's 4^3... It doesn't make sense, obviously...
And does anyone else notice that Federer's racket's butt cap looks like the regular nSix.One Tour?
The biggest thing about the ncode series was adding silicon oxide molecules between graphite fibers. K Factor, in addition to adding "karophite" in between other molecules(2:58), seems to put a little more research into noticable design changes.
no he really uses it, although the weigth and balance point might be different and customized. but it is the K-factor. At least, I work in a tennis shop, I watched the Wimbledon, and I actually recognised all the rackets they played with. Even this one.
Thanks for your comment. I wonder do you know what size grip he uses? I heard 4 3/8. And I also heard that he uses an overgrip to increase slightly (as at the 2007 Wimbledon)--so it's closer to 4 1/2. Is this correct?
He uses the K-factor. He tested 87 protocols before he found the one he liked. He's the most involved tennis player ever in the design of his own racket.
There is the debate over whether it's his other racquet painted to look like the (k)factor (Wilson doesn't care which he uses, just what the fans think they see him using). And I think you mean to say "87 protoTYPES"
lol yes i mean prototypes. There can be a debate. But it's definitely a new racket. I mean it's not just the fans, his official information and everything is changed. plus he's known for his honesty...just read his press confrences. it's a new racket, it's a new racket.
actually roger uses a custom original prostaff 6.0 its a bit heavier and stable than the stock. its the same racket hes used through all his career, the only thing that changes is the paint job.
Homens, a diferença é que o nº1 coreia...o nº2 gansa!!! This is the difference!!
FEEL IS ELEMENTAL
PlazaJJF 2 months ago
is NADAL interwienwing NADAL ?!?
STAMINAS1 6 months ago
i got this raquet's replica for 15 bucks :D
lYouJustGotOwneDl 6 months ago
la uso anche io e confermo e grande
9601augusto 8 months ago
Respond to this video... I got this for 30 bucks at 1saleaday. LOVE IT!
flofflethawaffle 9 months ago
sorry i failed
flofflethawaffle 9 months ago
its sad because hes number 3 now
airsoftbuddies50 10 months ago
why didn't you mention the K Factor K5 ?? That is my racket
Chipinjack 1 year ago
Roger interviewing Roger is way better that Jim Courier interviewing Roger.....I mean Courier messed up that Aussie Open interview
Chipinjack 1 year ago
Is he talking to himself... or that guy just looks identical to him..
cookies1and1creme 1 year ago
I want the K Factor K3 and I want it NOW !!
FairwayJack 1 year ago
"they are the best racquets for painting over"
redwonder 1 year ago
Roger should be having an existential meltdown after meeting his clone.
Ignozi 1 year ago
50:0 -->> you know, you know, you know,.....yes i now rog...your one of the best...you know
TmVRCTY 1 year ago
plz subscribe me
mightymazzapotatoes 2 years ago
where can i have a look at that racket selector table???
pedroacp 2 years ago
@pedroacp google images?
adnoosh 7 months ago
The difference isn't the racquet, but Wilson does make good racquets. I always grew up thinking they were crap for some reason.
scaremenga 2 years ago
THE DIFFERENT IS ROGGGGER!
8xWTF 2 years ago
difference : roger federer.
iisoscar 2 years ago
there is such a nice pop from the racquet. anyone know what causes that?
bowen1030 2 years ago
the difference is alone " Roger Federer"
francebros 2 years ago
Wilson neXt is coming!
xinnianhao 2 years ago 2
it actually does also depend in the raquet because each raquet has its different storng points and weaknesses and each speacilize in a different range of shots, say you got a crappy raquet, just because you got the skills dosen't mean your gonna win with it, I myself have used the K Factor K Five and I think its the best out of all the raquets that I have used.
goldeneggable 2 years ago
haha, dont believe the hype. its all about the skills not the racquet.
hurensohnsBruda 2 years ago
I wish it was a cool blue color. The colors look dated and un-inspired. I love the color of the Babolat Roddick GT.
tigercrap 2 years ago
ye im getting that racket as my second racket , i got the pure drive roddick ( old model look i think) not the one he has now .. but nevertheless its awesome !!
toutaaaaaaa 2 years ago
I use the KY sex in one.
tigercrap 2 years ago
i've owned atleast 6 rackets over the last 7 years and have to say that nothing comes anywhere close to the all around, absolute perfection of the kfactor six.one tour. everything else feels shockingly inferior to this. the fed knows what he's doing.
debenny1 2 years ago
main racquet K Blade 98
TennisDownTheLine 2 years ago
i have a 2 wilson k6.1 95 x i love the control and the feel, i can sever and hit almost at a college level
solowingpixy1 2 years ago
im using the k blade team
BjarkiSveins 2 years ago
I use a Wilson K Blade 98 and K blade Tour mainly K blade 98 it has good control good power and good feel i love it
TennisDownTheLine 2 years ago
Masin racquet K Blade 98 Best racquet in my opinion
TennisDownTheLine 2 years ago
kblade tour FTW
TennisEuphoria 2 years ago
i am using the k pro tour
TheFilipmilos 2 years ago
i have the k blade 98 and its pretty good for [k]ontrol.g0 wilson=D
gamenut888 2 years ago
i use the k zen and i love it
garra79 2 years ago
Wilson K six one tour 90 is the best racket i've ever tried. It really provides great control and feeling over the ball. Overall it improved my backhand and forehand. Great racket.
sersempeco 2 years ago
...... you know xD
SRBNovakDjokovicSRB 2 years ago
the best raquet:wilson [k] siz one team
marianitho94 2 years ago
agreed!
hihat7 2 years ago
i love WILSON(L)
roger federer RULES!!:D
Jeroenrecon 2 years ago
i notice roger always says "You Know" like manny pacquiao in boxing...
rrpisti22 2 years ago
Comment removed
debenny1 2 years ago
Comment removed
debenny1 2 years ago
wow- has anyone else noticed how much the interviewer in this video looks like roger federer??
debenny1 2 years ago
lol its him..
fadzy640 2 years ago
i do prefer the k90 over most rackets, just better for me, however the 90mm makes it more challenging to hit the sweet spot, one of the hardest rackets to use
Nightmare200X 2 years ago
do you mean 90 square inch racket face?
polipoli7 2 years ago
the difference of winning is playing against Roddick and losing is Nadal not some racket that makes not much difference at all
jmacnz 2 years ago
Listen to all this giberish shite from 2:42 onwards. Nano fibers, sio2 molecules, kontur yolk. Have you ever heard such fuckin' rubbish before? The advert might as well be saying...'Yeah buy this racquet and you will play just like Roger'.. Id like to shoot the cunt that's narrating this.
doovle 2 years ago
i wouldnt mind playing like federer. shit id even settle for playing like nadal or roddick.
gameplay0 2 years ago
What is the difference between number 1 and number 2? Nadal kicks Federer's arse, thats what the difference is. Fed may win the odd few but Nadal rules!
doovle 2 years ago
because fed is past it nolw in his prime on hard courts he would kill nadal
eddieTHEGREAT999 2 years ago
Just like that huh? He'd kill him? In other words Nadal may not even bother turning up the way you desribe it. Youre that sure are you? Tell me who will win the French Open this year followed by Wimbledon and the the US Open. If all yur predictions come true then i will remove my comment and reffer to you as the KING! Fair enough?
doovle 2 years ago
He's 2/3 the way there. No excuses.
xenero 2 years ago
i said fed would kill nadal on fast courts in his prime which i believe is true as he totally out played him in the 2006 - 2007 masters cup finals and wimby 06... i must admit that nadal is better now then then but fed is not as good now as then.. i think fed will win either us open or no slams this year because its the fastest surface now . the grass at wimby is so slow it plays into the hands of the new bread of tennis players not the likes of fed and doddick ect
eddieTHEGREAT999 2 years ago
@ doovle,
eddie is right! :p
ProudTarjaholic 2 years ago
:) you no were right
eddieTHEGREAT999 2 years ago
i wanna a [K]Factor Six One Tour .__.
Rubinho1993 2 years ago
Then go out and fuckin' get one!
doovle 2 years ago
cooooooooooooooooooooooooool video federer is the best tennis player an i love his raquet 5/5
crgiodiaz 2 years ago
you know... you know..
Jacob2667 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the interview guy looks like roger federer. it's like the same guy asking and answering.
TheLittlestRiceball5 3 years ago
no shit
DylanMakesNoise 2 years ago 3
haha maybe it's the racquet that's masking Federer's full potential
uniquehand 3 years ago
FEDERER AND WILSON THE BEST!!!!!!!!!. Kisses from Spain.
noex89tennis 3 years ago 2
lol roger 3:50
mcode025 3 years ago
lol
"ahh hee hee its crazy"
animaanimaanima 2 years ago
i really liked the racket when i first got it but i play on clay all the time, every day. It gets very tiring as for a tennis racket, this is not light. I bought the lite version but that was too light lol. I actually prefer the six-one team. But thats just me
theXDEXclan 3 years ago
I wil be the new champion of wilson tennis generation
stefanfirst 3 years ago
Like I said, a heavy racquet is desirable for those with the requisite technique. Using your body properly, it is not difficult to accelerate a heavier racquet. Of course, if one's technique is poor, they will have trouble with a heavier racquet - this is why beginner's racquets are light. You also have to factor in string tension - fed strings 45-54, which is relatively low for today's frames but just fine for a flexible 90sq inch head like the PS90/K90.
sukivan27 3 years ago
I don't know how RF uses these racquets! They are heavy and don't provide power. They feel horrible! I'm a 4.5-5.0 level player and I play all court and can't imagine using this. I like a little lighter racquet even though I understand the value of having some weight. It looks cool though but I don't know how he competes with it, OR PS using the racquet he did. RF head size is 90 sq in and PS was 85! Crazy. PS was very heavy. Amazing.
AnthonyGF 3 years ago
you're not a 4.5 or 5.0; if you were, you'd understand and appreciate weight in a racquet (and the k six one 90 is not even that heavy).
you're probably a 2.5 or 3.0 - at most, a weak 3.5 :)
sukivan27 3 years ago
You faggot, I'll slap your face if you say that in front of me. Wrong sissy, it is a difficult and heavy racquet to use. I've played for years with heavy, tight strung racquets and I cannot do it anymore. My worst I'm a 4.5 my best a 5.0. Take a hike fool. I've hit with these things and they are tough.
AnthonyGF 3 years ago
If we meet in person and I underestimate your NTRP rating you'll attack me? Awesome.
I work at a tennis store and have hit with every single non-oversized racquet on the market from Wilson, Prince, Babolat, Head, Yonex, Tecnifibre, and Dunlop.
sukivan27 3 years ago
I work in a tennis shop as well and I teach tennis full-time and do well. I string racquets all the time and I've strung, and played with, almost everything out there. Your comment previously about me was ignorant. Thanks.
AnthonyGF 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
it's a very bad raquet
vladstefan13 3 years ago
you are just too noob to use it
MI6MI5 3 years ago
a noob to use this racquet? it isn't a racquet that hits the ball for you but it does help in other ways. I think it is a really nice racquet
mcode025 3 years ago
It's a really great raquet!!! It makes magic shots!!!
migueljana 3 years ago 2
Hes so Smug but ya got ta love em
JoshyNooney 3 years ago 2
yeah, I have one :))
hodicha 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wait does federer have a twin?.... im confused who is that other guy asking him questions?
k factor k zen is awesome!!!
shazdaman22 3 years ago
Holy Fuck..... I hope your being sarcastic, otherwise you're just stupid
RAFAnadalnumber1 3 years ago
i have a kfactor kblade tour and it`s awesome!!
gen0123II 3 years ago
im 13 and i have a k six one tour
punkrockjunkie9000 3 years ago
tats crazy XD
BoiProduction 3 years ago
lol im like 12 and i have a k six one 95
xerxestron 3 years ago
federer isnt the best....
HE is the best
MafiaBrotherz08 3 years ago 7
hello im 16 and my hight is 1.72. what do you thin about tha ksix one team for me?. or what about the k surge is it confort or heavy?. I wanna learn tennis from zero. Greetings.
DanielCMM 3 years ago
it really depends on what u want i a racquet: power, control, feel, or maneuverability. the 6one team is really good 4 control if u like the sweeetspot about the size of a tennis ball. the surge is for a good blend of power y control. odd weight balance tho. i have a kzen con hybrid strings
justaguy4321 3 years ago
Don't start with the [K]Six-one because they are really expensive, I would shop around and look for something about 100sq in. because your age and size anything bigger would have too much power and anything smaller because of your skill would cause numerous mis-hits. But most important of all, DEMO DEMO DEMO. You can spent 200$ on Rogers racquet and play like crap. Get what fits you the best.
utvolsfan1985 3 years ago 6
your sixteen and your using suck a light racket? omg
aeroprodrive13346 3 years ago
hola tengo 16 mido 1.72 ... Como creen que me iria con la ksix one team? es muy pesada? O como creen que me iria con la K Surge? que tan pesada o comoda es? ... Quiero empezar en eel tennis desde cero. Saludos.
DanielCMM 3 years ago
That was a great video and it really helped me for my choice in what racket i want. Do you know where i can get a Wilson (k)One?
Thanks.
Unzeyz 3 years ago
nadal e il # 1 federer,# 2
ahah
wuaccos 3 years ago
i love [k] factor raquets, i have the [k]zen but i don't like roger federer i like "nole" most
mellamopezzo 3 years ago
Lol, Federer is fucking hilarious at 3:50
spaz9i2 3 years ago
hhaha yea look at his neck
GuyMcpersonLol 3 years ago
The K-Six-One-Tour is so fuckin heavy, I would not recommend it to anyone who well advanced in tennis fucking shit its like swinging a tree, which is why im amazed how this guys goes five sets with that thing
emmi360 3 years ago
I am 14 and I play with that raquet. It's not that heavy when you get used to it. It has much better control and power to me compare to the ncode series raquets
anodizedaluminium 3 years ago
k factor has more control power isnt everything
ryguyispimp 3 years ago
you know the new racket is the (K)Blade. i tested it its a better racket be´cause you have more powererful shots
Tornadofreak2 4 years ago
yes my friend bought one and we switched racquets in the middle of the game... so have you noticed the smaller sweetspot? compared to my K-90 Tour is not very manouverable and doesnt have much power at serves...
Daeron15 3 years ago
does anyone notice federer always saying "you know" in the interview. like Manny Pacquiao lol
polipoli7 4 years ago
federer has a brother!
Leziii 4 years ago
whts a good CHEAP string is good for this racket??!?!?! MUST KNOW! thxs
Magicball321 4 years ago
a good racket must be played with a good string, having a cheap string on a k factor fucks it all up
bloodfangz 4 years ago 3
cuz strings are the soul of the racquet but i´ll recommend Gamma strings they are good and affordable price...
Daeron15 3 years ago
Sure, made in China! I have this racquet and this is just a marketing ploy. Like the Chinese child laborers can produce "k-technology"
BCB113 4 years ago
its just expensive here in the phillipines(the k 6.1 tour) so i cant buy it T_T in america they sell it for $189 but here its 13,500 pesos which is equal to $350+? O_O
polipoli7 4 years ago
I have nCode Six-Two
DIANAROSS4EVER 4 years ago
I customize my racket with electrical tape :)
polipoli7 4 years ago
nice.. o_O
jasonxseo 4 years ago
i bought that k factor one and it was amazing i normaly dont win but i was doing amazing against everyone
menace1011 4 years ago
thats a physocoligal matter.
if you feel like you are the best with your racquet then you probably are goingo to win.
prefagt 4 years ago 2
Roger federer your a gangster
DuckFreak01 4 years ago 6
I used to use the Pure Drive Roddick which had good power, but was very stiff and it had no feel. Wanted more control, feel, and decent power so I bought the K Factor 6.1 95 and it is way better than the PDR.
unstable111111111111 4 years ago
lol im the other way around... i switched K-Factor 90 tour to Pure Drive Roddick i mean it wasn´t a bad racquet just that pure control is not my thing it lacked so much power compared to the old wilson hammer titanium and they dont sell those anymore so i found babolat´s pure drive which gave me the POWER i wanted and also the stiffness like a rock!
Daeron15 3 years ago
Most pros rackets are customized. Federers racket has the K factor paint job, but its way different from what you buy at a tennis shop.
unstable111111111111 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
he doesnt actually use it, none of the pros actually use the rackets they say they do...its just painted to look like it
nyjet12345 4 years ago
No really! Federer uses the (K)Factor racket.Go to the ATP and you will see
frankoslav 4 years ago
hello they customize them its different from what u buy ... so hes rite...
dragonteeth4 4 years ago
actually they are selling the same frame with leather grip exactly like federer´s even the bags are exactly like the pros use anti mouisture, but every pro has it´s own way to customize his racquet adding lead tapes to add more weight or balance, increasing grip size, having hybrid strings like polyester as main and natural gut in crosses...
Daeron15 3 years ago
K for King.
Quakespeare 4 years ago
I hav the wilson nCode n4 (Blue one venus won wimbly 05 with) and its great! makes tennis so easy! K factor may be better fr control but ncode is WAYY better for power and demolition of your opponent!!!
n1ko0 4 years ago
got the ksix one team!
awesome racket!! =D
r0b3rt037 4 years ago
must...buy...wilson...k factor...now
Xasthur1337 4 years ago 2
I swear to god that the host is an exact replica of roger federer.
lol
LOOK AT HIM!
cardtrickz 4 years ago
are you fucking serious?
Tweekurs 4 years ago
And to think that the #1 player in the world would change his racket every time the marketing geniuses decide they need to boost sales? By use two Rodger Federers you know right away that its all smoke and mirrors. There are alledgedly 4 key K "technologies," but in the end your only get K cubed or K^3. So either they are leaving one of the key technologies out, or those advanced "scientists" don't know that cubed means ^3 not ^4.
tennisplayer77a 4 years ago
This video is so funny that Federer himself can barely contain his laughter when he starts talking racket technology/hype, watch his smile. The commercial starts off by asking whats the diff between #1 and #2, even suggesting that the answer has anything to do with your racket is absurd.
tennisplayer77a 4 years ago
I use N6.1..is it worth it buying the k6.1 Team?
my wrist got injured and i have no power..
and i would like control..so i need a light frame..
should i get it?
supershroom164 4 years ago
Hi supershroom164. I am regentville the guy who posted this video. I actually purchased the the K61 Team and did a review about it on my tennis blog. Type a search on "regentville tennis blog" on google and you'll find my site. Hope this helps.
regentville 4 years ago
Well, if your wrist hurts it's probably because of the grip size and the weight of the racket, if you want to buy this, you have to make sure you have a strong wrist. the fram is 4/4 and the weight is a lot heavier than the N6.1, but yes, i like this racket for control and the light frame
bloodfangz 3 years ago
bougth k factor its amezing
biertentietjes 4 years ago
i use a k 6-1 tour and i love it..great control and i love the maneuverability at the net!
npsuxman 4 years ago
i am 4.8 5.1 atm myself and i use ncocde i would like to try the k factor myself 1s
biertentietjes 4 years ago
I'm more of a Babolat person, but oh how I would LOVE to be on that couch with TWO Roger Federers^^
RogersVampireDream 4 years ago
I swear, all of these Wilson commercials could be put in movie theaters and make everyone believe for a few seconds it's a movie, not a commercial.
But how the hell do they get 64% more control from 4 cubed when the 4 is "4 key technologies"? I mean, it's 4^3... It doesn't make sense, obviously...
And does anyone else notice that Federer's racket's butt cap looks like the regular nSix.One Tour?
Oreoclan 4 years ago
its for 5.5 and above dee dee
wolfslasher2 4 years ago
K Factor sucks, cause it only for level 5.0 players
leotom1990 4 years ago
i like the k 95
iloveuTJ 4 years ago
are all the "key technologies" for all the k series, or just the k one??
EddySpagetti7 4 years ago
he's HOT
kurfurstus 4 years ago
What's the difference between the NCODE and the
K Factor
Brian2727233 4 years ago
The biggest thing about the ncode series was adding silicon oxide molecules between graphite fibers. K Factor, in addition to adding "karophite" in between other molecules(2:58), seems to put a little more research into noticable design changes.
tyghr 4 years ago
Lmao this video is a classic. Tennis balls in the fruit bowl and two roger federers...
killeruser 4 years ago 2
This video is pretty funny. I enjoy how it's not really even acknowledged that he's talking to himself. He's just so of...there...twice.
Holygrail2 4 years ago
Anyone gonna comment on how FUNNY this thing is....
it's like HILARIOUS!!
HNCS2006 4 years ago
wtf?
kobe1federer1 5 years ago
I bet you didn't read anything about it then.
Go read it then we'll talk.
myngfx 5 years ago
Go on Tennis-Warehouse message boards and talk to me when you're done reading all the marketing cràp that Wilson has made up to sell more rackets.
myngfx 5 years ago
Its a paintjob most likely
AzN2K6 5 years ago
no he really uses it, although the weigth and balance point might be different and customized. but it is the K-factor. At least, I work in a tennis shop, I watched the Wimbledon, and I actually recognised all the rackets they played with. Even this one.
SharonX 4 years ago 2
Thanks for your comment. I wonder do you know what size grip he uses? I heard 4 3/8. And I also heard that he uses an overgrip to increase slightly (as at the 2007 Wimbledon)--so it's closer to 4 1/2. Is this correct?
baritono81 3 years ago
hmmm, could be, but I don't know, that's not something they told me. But it could be possible, for more control.
SharonX 3 years ago
haha this interview id great..
jsnapple 5 years ago
it is a paintjob dumbàss
myngfx 5 years ago
This is quite funny but its amazing the lengths they'll go to to sell more rackets. Federer doesn't use the k factor himself.
stratomaster 5 years ago
He uses the K-factor. He tested 87 protocols before he found the one he liked. He's the most involved tennis player ever in the design of his own racket.
HNCS2006 4 years ago
There is the debate over whether it's his other racquet painted to look like the (k)factor (Wilson doesn't care which he uses, just what the fans think they see him using). And I think you mean to say "87 protoTYPES"
bnumber8 4 years ago
lol yes i mean prototypes. There can be a debate. But it's definitely a new racket. I mean it's not just the fans, his official information and everything is changed. plus he's known for his honesty...just read his press confrences. it's a new racket, it's a new racket.
HNCS2006 4 years ago
actually roger uses a custom original prostaff 6.0 its a bit heavier and stable than the stock. its the same racket hes used through all his career, the only thing that changes is the paint job.
nalk7 4 years ago
it´s prototypes! wow, roger must be very demanding of his equipment!
reefric 3 years ago