Just because a guy has a difference of opinion on how old the earth is he is crazy? Sound like sheep being head to the slaughter house...Always most always a person that has a difference of opinion is always going to be ridiculed...You guys prove that theory.....
The sun has 1.5 x 10^30 kg of hydrogen gas in it. Now one mole of hydrogen atoms weighs 1.00794 grams. So that's 1.488 x 10^33 moles of hydrogen in the sun. That's 8.96 x 10 ^56 atoms of hydrogen !!!!!!!! The sun converts aproximatly 8.9×10^37 atoms of hydrogen a second to helium. That means that the sun has fuel for about 1.01 x 10^16 seconds. That number equal 3.19 x 10^11 years!
Some scientists say blah, blah, blah....BUT I BELIEVE so that MUST BE TRUE....and every one who dont believe in what i believe will burn in hell->Sounds familiar?
Oh Shuttup and get a Life! Go back to your Flat Earth Society and preach to the Choir there. No serious person believes that the Earth is only 6000 years old. If you believe that; you'd believe anything,
You get on peoples' nerves, Pal. especially mine.
Along with your Bible studies you ought to read Dale Carnegie's "How to Win Friends & Influence People." There is a time to sow and a time to reap. You should realize there is also a time to speak and a time to shut your hole.
@BastardfromtheBush Why are you so hostile at another persons opinion? It make him less serious because of his belief....? Oh that's right the earth is billions of years old because scientist said so...
@hule1186 I really don't have anything against anyone who holds any sort of opinion even if it's patently absurd. like VenomX. It's just that I'm appalled by the guy's arrogance and it's made worse by the fact that he's a Bible-Bashing Jesus Freak using pseudo-scientific jargon to justify his spurious position.He's worse than a Jesuit Priest or a Talmudic Scholar Rabbi the way he does this. However, you're right! I can just ignore him and I will!
this tool reeeally likes the word impossible....really, 6k? there is proof let alone fossils and whatnot from more then six thousand years ago....so ummmmm history and science does not exist?
@zideffil you offered nothing of substance just emotional opinion, and with respect to your comment against ZaeemIslamSoldier, while I too disagree with him, you offered nothing but a blatant ad hominem fallacy. @blackarawak83 how would explain that it is? what reasons would you offer that don't already ASSUME the conclusion--cosmic evolution occurred? Again, typically evolutionists dont like to go into details with earth-age-dating for the obvious reason that it only reveals circular reasoning.
This liittle asshole of a Shawn is SO irritating. His conceit is something to see. I just hope that soon he will have something smarten him up and help him to see how far from reality he has strayed. Religion is such a horrid affair for the weak-minded among us such as Shawn and it has totally screwed him up. Even his parents have distanced themselves from him. What a pitifull situation.
Allah has provided a great reward for his servants in paradise, you will have all what your souls desire and when you convert you will become sinless like a baby. Dont let the devil deceive you by the love of this world. Know that the great disasters are a test from Allah. Also know that ALLAH's wrath is severe, mostly to the heedless. The people lie about God to deceive and the Christians say Jesus is the Son of God. Know that our Lord is one, Our God is one, worship and serve him ONLY.
@ZaeemIslamSoldier Please tell me that you're kidding. I don't believe anyone could be as fucked up as you seem to be. Muhammed was a whore-mongering thief, a pedophile, and an outright asshole in every sense of the word. Anyone who would follow his teachings is an idiot - end of story.
@zideffil So your saying if someone believes in one god and him as a prophet. Prays 5 times a day, give charity to the poor, go to Hajj if affordable, Fasting for 30 days, is an idiot? Because all these things you only have to do to be in the religion of Islam, our prophet taught us the 5 pillars of Islam and whoever does them then they are Muslims in Islam. You are the idiot insulting such a purifying religion. I bet you love this world and follow its desires that is why uare arrogant
@ZaeemIslamSoldier You're goddamned right I love this world and I can't stand ignorant fools and assholes who would try and destroy it, whether they are Christians, muslims, or whatever their foolishness is. I live for the day that there will be no more stupid religions and people will be able to join the 21st century and THINK WITH THEIR MINDS!!! Only then will mankind be free and will be able to realise his or her full potential.
@zideffil If only you could realise that you were born free and you don't owe anything at all to any fictitious 'god'. All you have to do is to be a good person and be guided by your own conscience. That is why we have a conscience - it's there to guide us and if we listen to it, which isn't very hard to do at all, we will KNOW if we are doing right or wrong. End of story. No need for prayer. It doesn't do one bit of good anyway.
. . . a claim of his own personal belief, per se. In other words: ASSUMING that "X had been operating at [constant] rate Y . . .". This is why evolutionists were so eager to teach evolution as though it was foundational to Biology and the other sciences, so as to keep ppl from thinking critically about their origins on Earth. They wanted critical thinking here, only so long as it is kept within the porous membrane of the theory of Evolution. What a shame, you put constraints on your thinking.
Every evoltionist knows this, that's why they were eager for radiometric dating (absolute dating). Not that r-dating IS absolute, but that it is thought to date things absolutely between such and such a range. There are common sense problems with both techniques that a Creationist can readily admit. And JMC didn't actually offer an argument just two SEPARATE assertions. The first is opinion which rings of emotional bias, and the second says "if", making it hypothetical and not actually . . .
@Scott19seventy5 and @JMUDoc you offered noting to this page that is not easily shot down even from evolutionists or highlights fallacious argumentative thinking. Scott your post is not reflective well of you your thining because obviously if God (considering His NECESSARY Nature) would likely have built ppl with an long enduring life-span in the day He created them without haveing to jump in and tamper with them constantly. Canyon? Relative dating again, the weakest dating method? Poor Scott.
When rational people want to know something about the natural world, they examine the natural world; when Christians want to know something about the natural world, they look in their storybook.
"The credibility of the Bible hinges on the age of the Earth..."
Wow - he just killed the Bible.
Kent Hovind uses the same nonsense about "if X had been operating at rate Y...", which assumes CONSTANCY.
Now all we have to do is believe that people in the Bible lived to be 900 years old, with no vaccines, no health care system, and oh yea, SIN. The Earth is BILLIONS of years old. Give it up kid. Take a trip to the Grand Canyon and have a look for your self.
Also, so there is no confusion with what I am saying. I already know that many geologists were clziming the earth to be millions of years old back then. The problem, however, was that it was just a weakly supported theory at best or a still to be substantiated hypothesis at worst. An honest observer could not through their relative dating techniques, assume the earth to necessarily be really old or not. They essentially just postulated an alternative explanation for the age of the earth.
It's been a while so I decided to see what ppl were saying on here. But once again as I stated earlier, the two comments rated up up at the top are indicative more so to the point that gregrutz is largely preaching to the choir on this Youtube page. His comment that r-dating ALWAYS gives old earth dates serves my point even better. I was being generous by saying "more often than not." The geologist comments by him that received thumbs-up, again, only reflects the ignorance of his supporters...
@TruthUnadulterated ...I have kept up with science and the history of it quite well thanks. But please, since gregrutz, you seem to know a lot more, tell how geologists KNEW the earth was so old, and why much of their methods before and after the advent of r-dating are considered "relative dating" as opposed to r-dating being considered "absolute dating." I eagerly wait for your response, since you erroneously claim these things with "science" to back you up.
This has to be a joke, right??? His account name is exchristian! So, Do I detect an overload of sarcasm? Or is this guy retarded? That serious face leaves me at a loss! Is my sarcasm detector broken?
This is amazingly crazy. I mean, the first agricultural revolution was undisputedly over 8000 yrs ago. His position is based on the linage of Jesus? The most unoriginal mythical figure. He doesn't even have an original birthday for a male deity, born to a virgin/young woman, that died at 33, and was resurrected 3 days later. That story was told before. . . for another god.
So if someone wrote the life story of santa clause 2000 years ago you would think it was true too. Tell me this then. In Genesis 11- 1And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech.
That was after the "great flood". There are from 6800 to 6900 distinct languages in the modern world today. Where did they all come from? Did people just decide to make up some new language that many times? I think that disproves the bible pretty well. There is no god.
@mikefulcher03AUG2000 look at the simple differences between british english and american english. English in the northern usa vs southern usa. in less than 300 years the language has more than 5 dialects alone. 100- years from now language should be nearly unrecognizable from today. I think that disproves your assessment.
@curtis12375 If you read my comment it says "distinct languages". Japanese, russian, german, french, english, spanish, tagalog, farsi, hadza, armenian, basque, and many more. Some are so distinct that they have nothing in common with other languages which means they did not have the same origin, which in turn means that a god did not greate us.
All those languages are real by the way, and it disproves the fiction that we were created by a god. If the life story of Santa Clause was written 1800 years ago, would you believe that too?
@mikefulcher03AUG2000 Well, we can read the history of Santa Claus presently. Verifiable and even know when the man walked the Earth. It's a shame so many of you try to equate the possibility of a Creator to the overblown fiction of Santa Claus, even though the stories may have more in common than you think, assuming, of course that the stories of a Creator outgrew the truth via years of story telling.
@curtis12375 The modern sants Claus is a mix of other like creations. One of those bieng the Dutch Sinterklaas and another being Nikolaos of Myra (Saint Nicholas). If you believe in one man created fiction then why not all of them?
The bible even calls the Earth a circle, which means flat, thus proving it was man made. If god knew it was a sphere don't you think the bible would say so?
@mikefulcher03AUG2000 You are asserting that I believe the Bible to be true or to at least be beyond error. I actually think there's good reason to think the Earth is more than 6000 years old. I can see evidence that supports this. HOWEVER that same evidence ALSO does support the damages capable of being caused by drastic earthquakes, which could cause drastic flooding and yes, a flood does move large amounts of soil, so a large flood could easily move even more.
@mikefulcher03AUG2000 IF the water did cover the earth, the sheer weight of that much water would compact the soil as it was being moved, replicating some of the damages and conditions we observe today. I actually DO know a lot about geology, too. I know enough to tell you that while the evidence appears to support billions of years, it ALSO can be used to support a great flood just the same. The aging system is flawed at present. IT isn't proven, but theorized.
@mikefulcher03AUG2000 We presently are aware of the origins of some of these languages as off shoots of the root Latin. Japanese and parts of Chinese share some words due to the traveling and interaction of their nations over the years. I demonstrated the morphology of languages in the localized sense showing how they can change in small ways in large nations of a single language. This goes to the pattern that it could have happened in the past, too. I don't know "greate".
@curtis12375 What about the 3 main races of humans? You can't make an asian from two whites or a black from two asians. If we assume that Noah was white where did the other races come from? He didn't have black or asian kids because that is geneticly impossible.
@mikefulcher03AUG2000 I'm curious where you theorize different races originate from. If we know that it is impossible, what isn't impossible that it COULD come from?
@mikefulcher03AUG2000 And I THOUGHT you might have meant create, but I don't like to assume knowledge. That's how these kinds of things all happen in the first place; people assuming they know something they don't actually know. We don't know the starting amounts of radioactive materials to verify the rate of radioactive decay. We don't know that radioactive decay actually is constant for certain, even though we have good reason to think it is. Not knowing means unproven.
The moon is in an orbit around the earth - this means it is in free fall toward the earth. It is accelerating toward us. The tangential motions prevent the two bodies from approaching each other. To total mechanical energy of the system is decreasing causing the radius of the system to increase over time - a very long time. Also there is PLENTY of water in space - ever heard of the Oort cloud? The ignorance it burns!
The most important factor for concluding that the earth is 6,000 years old is called "the silliness factor". Ok let's give it a try. Using the silliness factor I have concluded the American Revolution was about an hour ago.
thank you for taking us back the scientific beliefs of the 1400's you insecure asswipe, go do your scientific oppresion at the Vatican...oh right they dont believe in creationism either and try growing a real mustache cuz you are embarassing yourself with more than just speaking about your incorrect beliefs
You have no references for your scientific claims and they are all wrong. The moon does accumulate dust but it also loses dust due to other impacts knocking it off because of the low gravity. DUH!
@7:10comets come from the Oort Cloud which is made up of billions of icy bodies in orbit around the sun.Comets CAN be billions of years old because they get knocked out of the Oort Cloud occasionally and enter a new orbit and are then considered "comets" rather than Oort Cloud bodies.You really need to take an Astronomy class!
Heres a comment for you. And it only....2 words....ready for them...?
EXPLAIN DINOSAURS
.....I'll give you some time....wait....no i shouldnt cuz your DUMB BRAINWASHED FOOL OF AN ASS will just try and dispprove. So in the words of every scientist.....Fossil....
He gets off on people attacking him. Playing with fire, someone one day will do something horrible to him. Not me, not you, but you cannot live like that without attracting people who would do something horrible.
His 'understanding' of science keeps us laughing, though.
Venomfuckhead is an arrogant, obnoxious, ignorant little prick whom I would love to meet. He should be taken to a logging camp for a year and learn to work and deal with real men. May his 'god' help him if he is ever convicted of a crime, a thing which will most likely happen if he keeps on being so evil and lazy, because he would become someone's little girlfriend on the first day. That would surely shut him up for awhile.
I love how VenomFangX disables his comments on his channel. This guy is hilarious. The best part is he is SO arrogant and smug even though he's 100% wrong in almost everything he says.
Atheists don't think your grandparents were chimpanzees. Maybe a really stupid atheist says something like that. BTW, If your grandparents were chimpanzees it would disprove evolution.
@RageAddiction It is very revealing , VERY, how it is only the Christians who say that our ancestors were monkeys. An intelligent, thinking, informed person doesn't say any such thing but says that apes and humans had a common ancestor. There is a HUGE difference in that statement that dumb-ass Christians just don't have the capability of seeing. Very revealing also how they will purposly lie every time in order to try to prove a point.
@RageAddiction They would have been something else millions of years ago called neanderthals. Chimps are a branch of the same family we come from. DUH, it's science
Don't worry if you can't explain your way around this. I already know from years of dealing with this that there is no evolutionist who can adequtely deal with it--expert or not. It always ends up in either circular reasoning or saying things like, "even if we can't conclusively show long ages, it doesn't mean that we should just appeal to a 'God of the Gaps'." Sometimes other explations are given as well suggesting that life began to evolve somewhere else and came to earth on a meteorite, etc.
@gregrutz Just plain wrong! Wrong about carbon dating and wrong about knowing how much was there from the start--whether lead in crystals or not. For each substance one can do no more than guess as to how much was there from the start and there is no logical way that anyone can say they knew the exact number from the start. As I pointed out already and you did NOT refute because you can't, all isotope counts are effected by environmental factors such as flood waters and magma/lava flows, etc ...
@gregrutz ... and we know that! In such cases isotope renderings are always larger as has been demonstrated numerous times when we already knew the age of the formation of a rock ahead of time. Therefore, for the earth to be billions of years old with the cosmic evolutionary story given for the earth, it means that the dates of the oldest rocks especially are most certainly wrong by a tremendous amount. Infact all are off but we can be sure with common logic/sense and science that they're wrong
...and we don't know how much of the parent isotope was in the sample from the start at the moment of its creation, nor can we ever know. Furthermore, if the planet is old as I already stated then the ages would necessarily appear MUCH OLDER given the HUGE environmental changes AT the creation of the earth given cosmic evolution. And only continue to appear older over the BILLIONS of years time that passes on this dynamic planet called Earth. One just can't get around this!
@TruthUnadulterated ''we don't know how much of the parent isotope was in the sample from the start '' YES we do. Lead does not fit easily into the structure of some crystals, so when they form there is no lead in them. So they count the U and the Pb atoms and can estimate the age of rocks. Ash layers are usually dated above and below a fossil to get a range.
The oldest rock dated is 4,545 million years old + or - 2 million years.
@gregrutz I find it interesting that gregrutz response to me is part of the top comments when he did not succeed at refuting my posts. Perhaps, truth just doesn't matter to evolutionists who already made up in their mind that they will not let go of their old earth unscientifically verifiable beliefs. So sad. Let's face it, belief in a young earth via science has no advantage nor disadvantage to old earth believers using verifiable science. Clearly there are few truthful ppl in this world.
@TruthUnadulterated Geologists found out the earth was millions of years old over 200 years ago, try and keep up with science. My comment is rated up because I have science to back up my claims.
@gregrutz sigh. Geologists think that's true. It COULD be but is NOT proven. It is not proven because other, even if less likely but still possible options exist to explain the rock formations.Radiometric dating isn't proving much about super old anything, because the equation requires 2 unknown variables and 1 possible variable, where 1 unknown is being assumed (the starting amount of radioactivity), another assumes the rate of decay is constant even though unverified. Basic algebra.
@gregrutz How would you like to back up your claim? Or does your claim have the same lack of validity that you guys seem convinced his claim does? I don't have a theory of the age of the Earth, nor universe. I can work a math problem like nobody's business, though. So what supports your assessment of the age of the Earth?
@curtis12375 GEOLOGY ! The ‘Super Group’ of rocks in the Grand Canyon is below the level layers at the east end. These layers were laid down level, block faulted into mountains [tilted], worn flat, and then the Teapeats Sandstone was laid down over the basement layers. Then another 5000 feet of sediments was laid down, some wind blown desert sands, some corals. Then the whole area got raised to 8000 feet above sea level. Finally water flowing down hill cut the canyon. How long did this take
@gregrutz Did you observe this occurring? Do you know how it happened? Could.. I don't know... a large Flood, have caused large amounts of land to be moved, carrying distant soils and then the sheer weight of that much water over the moved/ moving soil caused a type of compacting that results in similar structures of the Earth? Could a HUGE Earthquake have forced up mountain ranges and caused a huge flood that all together caused these results with a false positive of sorts?
@gregrutz Do you say these things do not do as such because they lack the traits capable of causing such OR because ou have never witnessed them occurring?
@TruthUnadulterated It does not matter the amount of parent isotope becasue the calulate the age based on the ratio of parent to daughter atom.
In Carbon 14 dating they count the radioactive atoms left. It has a short enough time frame that it can be tested against known ages like the Egyptians over 4000 years ago. The oldest city dug up so far is 20,000 years old, dated with C14 method.
''irrelevent comments rather than demonstrating the evidence ''
But as I pointed out most ppl on here give ad hominem attacks and other irrelevent comments rather than demonstrating the evidence and the logic behind it for yielding a long age. The fact is this. We all (creationist and evolutionist) agree on this: Radiometric dating more often than not provides large ages on rocks. They are contaminated by the environment. Collaboration methods are therefore used. These methods are derived from radiometric dating things that need collaboration, and so on...
physically looks smart but only smart ass... he is just completely brian washed by his book... smart enough to remove the rating because even he knows his video will be rated full red XD
And the guy is not even a moon hoaxer, he accepts that we landed on the moon. It makes it even crazier. How can you accept that scientists know enough to make men walk on the moon yet at the same time they're so wrong about basic things like the age of the earth? It baffles me. If you really believe the earth is 6000 years old you have to be so batshit crazy that you shouldn't believe any goddamn thing about science, that aspirin doesn't work and planes don't fly.
@Knr911 To be honest the evidence for landing on the moon is more conclusive than for determining the age of the earth--whether you're an evolutionist or not, that should be obvious. There are many who see a kind of circular reasoning with respect to dating the earth. The idea is this: for evolution to be true on earth, we NEED long ages. the dating methods are all effected by the environment and usually provide larger ages if something is wrong. Now here's the logical issue . . .
@TruthUnadulterated ... evryon agrees the earth is dynamic. If the earth was billions of years old and formed through accretion, including molten lava flows, etc, then right from the getgo the ages would appear larger than they are. Given billions of years and they DEFFINITELY will appear larger through decay rates with all environmental changes. That leaves no adequate collaborative methods that can be scarcely relied upon. If we get any short ages at all, then, the whole earth must be young.
@TruthUnadulterated One last thing to note. It means that even if we dont get young ages. If we can be nearly certain about anything, we can reasonably assume scientifically that the earth is considerably younger than the oldest dated rock on earth, NOT the same or older. How much younger would be up for debate.
@gregrutz Thanks for proving my point! 10,000 years is very young compared to evolutionist accounts of life on earth. Tell me, what exactly would be a sign of a flood on a tree? It seems to me that there are examples of trees that have been effected by some kind of flood and yet the evidence for it would not be accepted if not for the fact that it was observed. What's your evidence?
@TruthUnadulterated Dendrochronology or tree-ring dating is the scientific method of dating based on the analysis of patterns of tree-rings. Dendrochronology can date the time at which tree rings were formed, in many types of wood, to the exact calendar year. By overlapping tree rings going back in time you get an uniteruped 10,300 years of histoy of tree growing. So the earth is AT LEAST 10,300 years old and there hasn't been a global flood for at least 10,300 years. Get it now?
It's seems that YouTube is the hub for those who don't major in reasoning. Whether the commentors below agree with Venom or not, I've noticed that all the comments are either wrong, bad reasoning, or meaningless with respect to the arguments provided by Venomfangx. And to top it off, many succumb to name calling rather than providing evidence that can be critiqued. The Near Eastern accounts would suggest the age of the Earth to be still only a few thousand years, certainly not billions.
This person drastically cherry picks, turns facts around, and misinterprets things to contradict scientific claims that are well documented and proved beyond any doubt. What a moron with a nerve!
think about it like this, God created evolution and science followed after. evolution has A LOT of credible evidence. when you said the sun takes up too much hydrogen, all i have to say is it's called gravity dumbass.
you're a fundamentalist and are still a monkey. humans have branched off of them due to EVOLUTION! we didn't come from monkeys. we evolved from them. damn fundamentalists can't even interpret the true meanings of the books in the bible. you're not supposed to take it all literally! making christianity look bad man. Jesus forgives you.
Niether the Roman Catholics nor the Eastern Orthodox believe in Creationism or a 6000 year earht. Both ancient Churches accept evolution So 3/4 of christianity, that 1.5 Billion christians say this vemonfangx is a heretic and that's not including the Protestant that disagree with him. This Boy does not represent and majority or even large minority of christians. To use him to attack Christiany is a straw man. I am not accusing the uploader of doing this.What this Venom says is antichristian
Augustine Jr. There are too many problems in Exodus and Joshua where the chronology drops off. 40 years is a sacred number and Hebrew idiom. Which Old Testament? Jewish or Samaritan? hahaha. The older accounts of Sumer and Egypt refute you buddy, so do the Hindus. All older religions.
"The Christian religion is a parody on the worship of the sun, in which they put a man called Christ in the place of the sun, and pay him the adoration originally payed to the sun". -Thomas Paine-
If there is no resistance/ friction, how would a comet lose it mass? Isn't friction an opposing force against the forward movement of mass? I thought space was frictionless? And isnt the tail of a comet always pointing toward the sun?
perhaps Moses could have written , the world shall be 4004 years old when Jeus of nazerath is born in Bethleham. How hard would that have been for an omnipotent God to have dictated ?
I think we need to make reaction vids to Venomfangx's videos (like two girls one cup), its that bad. Here's a written script of my reaction:
hmm...oh hai its taht kid...ok he got that wrong, no big...hmm that's wrong too, ok...da fuuu? Ok, woow, and he says he knows science...*facepalm, *facepalm, *facepalm...omg, the fucks wrong with this kid?!...shut up shut up shut up! MY BRAIN!!!
Creationism is a bad theory. It takes into paganism. Because it tells us that God created this world. This means that he is God of nature, which is wrong. God is the God of the people, not nature. This is false teaching. You are distanced yourself from the doctrine of Christian teachings. Your God is the essential shadow, not the strong personality of religious doctrine. Because traits that you give him any reasonable man can destroy with logic. God is inscrutable, and you expose it.
lol some pretty mixed up maths (get a calculator n dont use the fingers..)
on one side he uses science to 'proove' that science is wrong? its like i proove that i have 11 fingers by counting down my left hand fingers from 10-9-8-7-6 then adding 5 to the 6 =11.
Fundamentalism is so easy to create - sad.
And sad thing is, that this ppl are allowed to vote some day..:(
Here's an antidote to this bullshit: /watch?v=iGDrq8rikJc
If you put your preferred beliefs first, and try to retrofit science to it you're going to end up saying stupid things like this creationist. The proper way to go is to find out FIRST how the world is, and THEN formulate beliefs. It's how science works. You know, the stuff that gave us navigation, transistors, immunosupressants, the Haber-Bosch process, and the computers you're all reading this comment on. Science, not religion. Please.
@Meresortsitar yeah i know- makes us all look bad, but i assure you, most kids in the U S are not raised to babble this sort of stuff...we do teach evolution in public schools
Adam to Jesus was about 4000 years? There's about 5000 years just to go from Adam to Enoch 7 generations. Then enoch was the father of Methuselah who was about 996. There's 6k already. In the year that methuselah died came noah's flood. Then they had to repopulate the earth
if i ever meet this freak i'd punch him right in his smug fucking face. he has no clue about anything. my 11 yr old niece knows more than this fucktard
@clickidyclack yeah he is serious....this is shaun....aka venomfangx. he is a creationist youtuber you by the way was caught scamming donations and had to make a public apology on youtube for stealing donations. he still makes videos and hes still a moronic idiot.
His kung fu is soooo much better than his science!! He is an indictment of the education system. How many scientific errors can you make in 10 minutes?
its funny this guy tries to disprove science by using science lmao, and is arrogant enough to believe that his virtually no understanding of the subject qualifies him to claim that scientists that have spent their live proving their idea/theories or disproving others is incorrect. And then he claims religion makes you humble. The sheer irony!
Is that Kirk Cameron's son? I'm just curious. He looks/sounds a lot like him. But if it is Cameron's kid, it's funny because the kid looks the same age as his old man.
I believe in a giant brain living inside Mars. If you need proof I will tell you that you just need to believe it to understand it. It is behind all creation and The MarsBrain has never written a book because it wants us people to believe by faith and not by words. You have to feel it like I do. Try to disprove me. You cant disprove it, but I can prove it to you... all you have to do is to take a leap of faith. LOL
I dont think people with a low iq can comprehend basic physics like this. Like when distance is measured in light years (the distance light travels in one year) and a star is more than 6000 lightyears away, we wouldn be able to see the star if the light from it was created after 6000 years ago.. The reason why (smart) people only THINK the universe is 13,7 billion years is because thats how far out we can observe. Also how would you explain trees that have turned to stone in 6000 years?
Just because a guy has a difference of opinion on how old the earth is he is crazy? Sound like sheep being head to the slaughter house...Always most always a person that has a difference of opinion is always going to be ridiculed...You guys prove that theory.....
hule1186 3 hours ago
kids say the darndest things....
benradio2612 1 day ago
The sun has 1.5 x 10^30 kg of hydrogen gas in it. Now one mole of hydrogen atoms weighs 1.00794 grams. So that's 1.488 x 10^33 moles of hydrogen in the sun. That's 8.96 x 10 ^56 atoms of hydrogen !!!!!!!! The sun converts aproximatly 8.9×10^37 atoms of hydrogen a second to helium. That means that the sun has fuel for about 1.01 x 10^16 seconds. That number equal 3.19 x 10^11 years!
lyricaltesting 3 days ago
keanu reevs matrix
prettyboiJustin 4 days ago
Some scientists say blah, blah, blah....BUT I BELIEVE so that MUST BE TRUE....and every one who dont believe in what i believe will burn in hell->Sounds familiar?
EvilMrDark 6 days ago
LOOL! This is just TOO FUNNY...make another video...PLEASE...i used this video to show my friends how christians can be IDIOTIC...thx :)
EvilMrDark 6 days ago
Oh Shuttup and get a Life! Go back to your Flat Earth Society and preach to the Choir there. No serious person believes that the Earth is only 6000 years old. If you believe that; you'd believe anything,
You get on peoples' nerves, Pal. especially mine.
Along with your Bible studies you ought to read Dale Carnegie's "How to Win Friends & Influence People." There is a time to sow and a time to reap. You should realize there is also a time to speak and a time to shut your hole.
BastardfromtheBush 1 week ago
@BastardfromtheBush Why are you so hostile at another persons opinion? It make him less serious because of his belief....? Oh that's right the earth is billions of years old because scientist said so...
hule1186 3 hours ago
@hule1186 I really don't have anything against anyone who holds any sort of opinion even if it's patently absurd. like VenomX. It's just that I'm appalled by the guy's arrogance and it's made worse by the fact that he's a Bible-Bashing Jesus Freak using pseudo-scientific jargon to justify his spurious position.He's worse than a Jesuit Priest or a Talmudic Scholar Rabbi the way he does this. However, you're right! I can just ignore him and I will!
BastardfromtheBush 2 hours ago
this tool reeeally likes the word impossible....really, 6k? there is proof let alone fossils and whatnot from more then six thousand years ago....so ummmmm history and science does not exist?
sujonight 1 week ago
This guy is such a fucking ldiot.
jedi88ful 1 week ago
yeessss you are.... i bet your a god lover too??
Countryboy27ish 1 week ago
fucking retard... 6k? really??
Countryboy27ish 1 week ago
@Countryboy27ish u are an idiot
ps3gamer386 1 week ago
@ps3gamer386 im the idiot? your an asshole..
Countryboy27ish 1 week ago
@Countryboy27ish lmaooooo so im an ass hole ?
ps3gamer386 1 week ago
Wow! 6,000 years. I have nothing productive to say about that.
paramattic70 1 week ago
at least he is clever enough not to allow as to vote like or not like his video as he knew that it would all turn RED!!!!
oandrikos 1 week ago
Must be a Republican.
mikeamburg 1 week ago
@zideffil you offered nothing of substance just emotional opinion, and with respect to your comment against ZaeemIslamSoldier, while I too disagree with him, you offered nothing but a blatant ad hominem fallacy. @blackarawak83 how would explain that it is? what reasons would you offer that don't already ASSUME the conclusion--cosmic evolution occurred? Again, typically evolutionists dont like to go into details with earth-age-dating for the obvious reason that it only reveals circular reasoning.
TruthUnadulterated 1 week ago
this clown wouldn't even know that sun in our solar system is even older than our Earth....how would he explain its existance?
blackarawak83 1 week ago
This liittle asshole of a Shawn is SO irritating. His conceit is something to see. I just hope that soon he will have something smarten him up and help him to see how far from reality he has strayed. Religion is such a horrid affair for the weak-minded among us such as Shawn and it has totally screwed him up. Even his parents have distanced themselves from him. What a pitifull situation.
zideffil 1 week ago
Allah has provided a great reward for his servants in paradise, you will have all what your souls desire and when you convert you will become sinless like a baby. Dont let the devil deceive you by the love of this world. Know that the great disasters are a test from Allah. Also know that ALLAH's wrath is severe, mostly to the heedless. The people lie about God to deceive and the Christians say Jesus is the Son of God. Know that our Lord is one, Our God is one, worship and serve him ONLY.
ZaeemIslamSoldier 1 week ago
@ZaeemIslamSoldier Please tell me that you're kidding. I don't believe anyone could be as fucked up as you seem to be. Muhammed was a whore-mongering thief, a pedophile, and an outright asshole in every sense of the word. Anyone who would follow his teachings is an idiot - end of story.
zideffil 1 week ago
@zideffil So your saying if someone believes in one god and him as a prophet. Prays 5 times a day, give charity to the poor, go to Hajj if affordable, Fasting for 30 days, is an idiot? Because all these things you only have to do to be in the religion of Islam, our prophet taught us the 5 pillars of Islam and whoever does them then they are Muslims in Islam. You are the idiot insulting such a purifying religion. I bet you love this world and follow its desires that is why uare arrogant
ZaeemIslamSoldier 1 week ago
@ZaeemIslamSoldier You're goddamned right I love this world and I can't stand ignorant fools and assholes who would try and destroy it, whether they are Christians, muslims, or whatever their foolishness is. I live for the day that there will be no more stupid religions and people will be able to join the 21st century and THINK WITH THEIR MINDS!!! Only then will mankind be free and will be able to realise his or her full potential.
zideffil 1 week ago
@zideffil If only you could realise that you were born free and you don't owe anything at all to any fictitious 'god'. All you have to do is to be a good person and be guided by your own conscience. That is why we have a conscience - it's there to guide us and if we listen to it, which isn't very hard to do at all, we will KNOW if we are doing right or wrong. End of story. No need for prayer. It doesn't do one bit of good anyway.
zideffil 1 week ago
Comment removed
hule1186 3 hours ago
@zideffil lol.....really!!!!!!!!
hule1186 3 hours ago
. . . a claim of his own personal belief, per se. In other words: ASSUMING that "X had been operating at [constant] rate Y . . .". This is why evolutionists were so eager to teach evolution as though it was foundational to Biology and the other sciences, so as to keep ppl from thinking critically about their origins on Earth. They wanted critical thinking here, only so long as it is kept within the porous membrane of the theory of Evolution. What a shame, you put constraints on your thinking.
TruthUnadulterated 1 week ago
Every evoltionist knows this, that's why they were eager for radiometric dating (absolute dating). Not that r-dating IS absolute, but that it is thought to date things absolutely between such and such a range. There are common sense problems with both techniques that a Creationist can readily admit. And JMC didn't actually offer an argument just two SEPARATE assertions. The first is opinion which rings of emotional bias, and the second says "if", making it hypothetical and not actually . . .
TruthUnadulterated 1 week ago
@Scott19seventy5 and @JMUDoc you offered noting to this page that is not easily shot down even from evolutionists or highlights fallacious argumentative thinking. Scott your post is not reflective well of you your thining because obviously if God (considering His NECESSARY Nature) would likely have built ppl with an long enduring life-span in the day He created them without haveing to jump in and tamper with them constantly. Canyon? Relative dating again, the weakest dating method? Poor Scott.
TruthUnadulterated 1 week ago
When rational people want to know something about the natural world, they examine the natural world; when Christians want to know something about the natural world, they look in their storybook.
"The credibility of the Bible hinges on the age of the Earth..."
Wow - he just killed the Bible.
Kent Hovind uses the same nonsense about "if X had been operating at rate Y...", which assumes CONSTANCY.
JMUDoc 1 week ago
Now all we have to do is believe that people in the Bible lived to be 900 years old, with no vaccines, no health care system, and oh yea, SIN. The Earth is BILLIONS of years old. Give it up kid. Take a trip to the Grand Canyon and have a look for your self.
Scott19seventy5 1 week ago
Also, so there is no confusion with what I am saying. I already know that many geologists were clziming the earth to be millions of years old back then. The problem, however, was that it was just a weakly supported theory at best or a still to be substantiated hypothesis at worst. An honest observer could not through their relative dating techniques, assume the earth to necessarily be really old or not. They essentially just postulated an alternative explanation for the age of the earth.
TruthUnadulterated 2 weeks ago
It's been a while so I decided to see what ppl were saying on here. But once again as I stated earlier, the two comments rated up up at the top are indicative more so to the point that gregrutz is largely preaching to the choir on this Youtube page. His comment that r-dating ALWAYS gives old earth dates serves my point even better. I was being generous by saying "more often than not." The geologist comments by him that received thumbs-up, again, only reflects the ignorance of his supporters...
TruthUnadulterated 2 weeks ago
@TruthUnadulterated ...I have kept up with science and the history of it quite well thanks. But please, since gregrutz, you seem to know a lot more, tell how geologists KNEW the earth was so old, and why much of their methods before and after the advent of r-dating are considered "relative dating" as opposed to r-dating being considered "absolute dating." I eagerly wait for your response, since you erroneously claim these things with "science" to back you up.
TruthUnadulterated 2 weeks ago
This has to be a joke, right??? His account name is exchristian! So, Do I detect an overload of sarcasm? Or is this guy retarded? That serious face leaves me at a loss! Is my sarcasm detector broken?
Greendragon420able 2 weeks ago 2
@Greendragon420able this guy in video call him self venomfangx gus he likes to poison peoples mind.the exchristian has re uploaded the vdeo
imewompa 3 days ago
What a stupid dickhead!
etch8989 2 weeks ago
This is amazingly crazy. I mean, the first agricultural revolution was undisputedly over 8000 yrs ago. His position is based on the linage of Jesus? The most unoriginal mythical figure. He doesn't even have an original birthday for a male deity, born to a virgin/young woman, that died at 33, and was resurrected 3 days later. That story was told before. . . for another god.
jldii195 2 weeks ago
Read a Geology book.
gregrutz 2 weeks ago
So if someone wrote the life story of santa clause 2000 years ago you would think it was true too. Tell me this then. In Genesis 11- 1And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech.
That was after the "great flood". There are from 6800 to 6900 distinct languages in the modern world today. Where did they all come from? Did people just decide to make up some new language that many times? I think that disproves the bible pretty well. There is no god.
mikefulcher03AUG2000 2 weeks ago
@mikefulcher03AUG2000 look at the simple differences between british english and american english. English in the northern usa vs southern usa. in less than 300 years the language has more than 5 dialects alone. 100- years from now language should be nearly unrecognizable from today. I think that disproves your assessment.
curtis12375 2 weeks ago
@curtis12375 If you read my comment it says "distinct languages". Japanese, russian, german, french, english, spanish, tagalog, farsi, hadza, armenian, basque, and many more. Some are so distinct that they have nothing in common with other languages which means they did not have the same origin, which in turn means that a god did not greate us.
mikefulcher03AUG2000 2 weeks ago
All those languages are real by the way, and it disproves the fiction that we were created by a god. If the life story of Santa Clause was written 1800 years ago, would you believe that too?
mikefulcher03AUG2000 2 weeks ago
And 300 years ago the world was nowhere near as diverse as it is today.
mikefulcher03AUG2000 2 weeks ago
@mikefulcher03AUG2000 Well, we can read the history of Santa Claus presently. Verifiable and even know when the man walked the Earth. It's a shame so many of you try to equate the possibility of a Creator to the overblown fiction of Santa Claus, even though the stories may have more in common than you think, assuming, of course that the stories of a Creator outgrew the truth via years of story telling.
curtis12375 2 weeks ago
@curtis12375 The modern sants Claus is a mix of other like creations. One of those bieng the Dutch Sinterklaas and another being Nikolaos of Myra (Saint Nicholas). If you believe in one man created fiction then why not all of them?
The bible even calls the Earth a circle, which means flat, thus proving it was man made. If god knew it was a sphere don't you think the bible would say so?
mikefulcher03AUG2000 2 weeks ago
@mikefulcher03AUG2000 You are asserting that I believe the Bible to be true or to at least be beyond error. I actually think there's good reason to think the Earth is more than 6000 years old. I can see evidence that supports this. HOWEVER that same evidence ALSO does support the damages capable of being caused by drastic earthquakes, which could cause drastic flooding and yes, a flood does move large amounts of soil, so a large flood could easily move even more.
curtis12375 2 weeks ago
@mikefulcher03AUG2000 IF the water did cover the earth, the sheer weight of that much water would compact the soil as it was being moved, replicating some of the damages and conditions we observe today. I actually DO know a lot about geology, too. I know enough to tell you that while the evidence appears to support billions of years, it ALSO can be used to support a great flood just the same. The aging system is flawed at present. IT isn't proven, but theorized.
curtis12375 2 weeks ago
@mikefulcher03AUG2000 We presently are aware of the origins of some of these languages as off shoots of the root Latin. Japanese and parts of Chinese share some words due to the traveling and interaction of their nations over the years. I demonstrated the morphology of languages in the localized sense showing how they can change in small ways in large nations of a single language. This goes to the pattern that it could have happened in the past, too. I don't know "greate".
curtis12375 2 weeks ago
@curtis12375 What about the 3 main races of humans? You can't make an asian from two whites or a black from two asians. If we assume that Noah was white where did the other races come from? He didn't have black or asian kids because that is geneticly impossible.
And you know I ment create.
mikefulcher03AUG2000 2 weeks ago
@mikefulcher03AUG2000 I'm curious where you theorize different races originate from. If we know that it is impossible, what isn't impossible that it COULD come from?
curtis12375 2 weeks ago
@mikefulcher03AUG2000 And I THOUGHT you might have meant create, but I don't like to assume knowledge. That's how these kinds of things all happen in the first place; people assuming they know something they don't actually know. We don't know the starting amounts of radioactive materials to verify the rate of radioactive decay. We don't know that radioactive decay actually is constant for certain, even though we have good reason to think it is. Not knowing means unproven.
curtis12375 2 weeks ago
willful ignorance
TheLevifrancisco 2 weeks ago
Not sure if trolling, or just very ignorant to scientific fact.
Spraynwipex 2 weeks ago
The moon is in an orbit around the earth - this means it is in free fall toward the earth. It is accelerating toward us. The tangential motions prevent the two bodies from approaching each other. To total mechanical energy of the system is decreasing causing the radius of the system to increase over time - a very long time. Also there is PLENTY of water in space - ever heard of the Oort cloud? The ignorance it burns!
aden302000 2 weeks ago
the moon dust argument has been shown to be wrong - sorry.
mica410 2 weeks ago
The most important factor for concluding that the earth is 6,000 years old is called "the silliness factor". Ok let's give it a try. Using the silliness factor I have concluded the American Revolution was about an hour ago.
phlewis86 2 weeks ago
thank you for taking us back the scientific beliefs of the 1400's you insecure asswipe, go do your scientific oppresion at the Vatican...oh right they dont believe in creationism either and try growing a real mustache cuz you are embarassing yourself with more than just speaking about your incorrect beliefs
yodirty33 3 weeks ago
You have no references for your scientific claims and they are all wrong. The moon does accumulate dust but it also loses dust due to other impacts knocking it off because of the low gravity. DUH!
yodirty33 3 weeks ago
@7:10comets come from the Oort Cloud which is made up of billions of icy bodies in orbit around the sun.Comets CAN be billions of years old because they get knocked out of the Oort Cloud occasionally and enter a new orbit and are then considered "comets" rather than Oort Cloud bodies.You really need to take an Astronomy class!
yodirty33 3 weeks ago
this is what young pedophiles look like
yodirty33 3 weeks ago
this sheltered inbred should really shave his pubic mustache too.....
yodirty33 3 weeks ago
this is another idiot trying to sound smart
yodirty33 3 weeks ago
There aren't enough facepalms to describe this video.
filip8546 3 weeks ago 6
does anyone knwo who this kid is??? whats his SN on here? pleez!
guineapiggyman 3 weeks ago
Heres a comment for you. And it only....2 words....ready for them...?
EXPLAIN DINOSAURS
.....I'll give you some time....wait....no i shouldnt cuz your DUMB BRAINWASHED FOOL OF AN ASS will just try and dispprove. So in the words of every scientist.....Fossil....
NOW SHUT UP.
XemnasDaSuperior 3 weeks ago
This moon dust argument VFX comes out with is absolute bolllocks, even Answers in Magic admits it.
LordDoomable 3 weeks ago
He gets off on people attacking him. Playing with fire, someone one day will do something horrible to him. Not me, not you, but you cannot live like that without attracting people who would do something horrible.
His 'understanding' of science keeps us laughing, though.
gateshead1000 3 weeks ago
I am amazed at how brainwashed people are in this advanced world.
PutmyDevilinUrHell 3 weeks ago
@PutmyDevilinUrHell He is only brainwashed because his parents made him worship church like it was suppose to spoonfeed him. LMAO
XemnasDaSuperior 3 weeks ago
Venomfuckhead is an arrogant, obnoxious, ignorant little prick whom I would love to meet. He should be taken to a logging camp for a year and learn to work and deal with real men. May his 'god' help him if he is ever convicted of a crime, a thing which will most likely happen if he keeps on being so evil and lazy, because he would become someone's little girlfriend on the first day. That would surely shut him up for awhile.
zideffil 3 weeks ago
I love how VenomFangX disables his comments on his channel. This guy is hilarious. The best part is he is SO arrogant and smug even though he's 100% wrong in almost everything he says.
jisaid08 3 weeks ago 4
I hate his smug little smirk.
brmadman4455 1 month ago
I find it weird that atheists actually believe atheism. I know my grand parents weren't chimpanzees.
RageAddiction 1 month ago
@RageAddiction
Atheists don't think your grandparents were chimpanzees. Maybe a really stupid atheist says something like that. BTW, If your grandparents were chimpanzees it would disprove evolution.
supersoulfly 1 month ago 2
@RageAddiction It is very revealing , VERY, how it is only the Christians who say that our ancestors were monkeys. An intelligent, thinking, informed person doesn't say any such thing but says that apes and humans had a common ancestor. There is a HUGE difference in that statement that dumb-ass Christians just don't have the capability of seeing. Very revealing also how they will purposly lie every time in order to try to prove a point.
zideffil 3 weeks ago
@RageAddiction They would have been something else millions of years ago called neanderthals. Chimps are a branch of the same family we come from. DUH, it's science
mikefulcher03AUG2000 2 weeks ago
HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAH
JoshCohenBassPlayer 1 month ago
Don't worry if you can't explain your way around this. I already know from years of dealing with this that there is no evolutionist who can adequtely deal with it--expert or not. It always ends up in either circular reasoning or saying things like, "even if we can't conclusively show long ages, it doesn't mean that we should just appeal to a 'God of the Gaps'." Sometimes other explations are given as well suggesting that life began to evolve somewhere else and came to earth on a meteorite, etc.
TruthUnadulterated 1 month ago
BTW Carbon 14 dating only goes back 60,000 years and does not work on fossils.
gregrutz 1 month ago
@gregrutz Just plain wrong! Wrong about carbon dating and wrong about knowing how much was there from the start--whether lead in crystals or not. For each substance one can do no more than guess as to how much was there from the start and there is no logical way that anyone can say they knew the exact number from the start. As I pointed out already and you did NOT refute because you can't, all isotope counts are effected by environmental factors such as flood waters and magma/lava flows, etc ...
TruthUnadulterated 1 month ago
@gregrutz ... and we know that! In such cases isotope renderings are always larger as has been demonstrated numerous times when we already knew the age of the formation of a rock ahead of time. Therefore, for the earth to be billions of years old with the cosmic evolutionary story given for the earth, it means that the dates of the oldest rocks especially are most certainly wrong by a tremendous amount. Infact all are off but we can be sure with common logic/sense and science that they're wrong
TruthUnadulterated 1 month ago
@gregrutz Merry Christmas!
TruthUnadulterated 1 month ago
...and we don't know how much of the parent isotope was in the sample from the start at the moment of its creation, nor can we ever know. Furthermore, if the planet is old as I already stated then the ages would necessarily appear MUCH OLDER given the HUGE environmental changes AT the creation of the earth given cosmic evolution. And only continue to appear older over the BILLIONS of years time that passes on this dynamic planet called Earth. One just can't get around this!
TruthUnadulterated 1 month ago
@TruthUnadulterated ''we don't know how much of the parent isotope was in the sample from the start '' YES we do. Lead does not fit easily into the structure of some crystals, so when they form there is no lead in them. So they count the U and the Pb atoms and can estimate the age of rocks. Ash layers are usually dated above and below a fossil to get a range.
The oldest rock dated is 4,545 million years old + or - 2 million years.
Any questions?
gregrutz 1 month ago
@gregrutz I find it interesting that gregrutz response to me is part of the top comments when he did not succeed at refuting my posts. Perhaps, truth just doesn't matter to evolutionists who already made up in their mind that they will not let go of their old earth unscientifically verifiable beliefs. So sad. Let's face it, belief in a young earth via science has no advantage nor disadvantage to old earth believers using verifiable science. Clearly there are few truthful ppl in this world.
TruthUnadulterated 1 month ago
@TruthUnadulterated Geologists found out the earth was millions of years old over 200 years ago, try and keep up with science. My comment is rated up because I have science to back up my claims.
gregrutz 1 month ago 16
@gregrutz sigh. Geologists think that's true. It COULD be but is NOT proven. It is not proven because other, even if less likely but still possible options exist to explain the rock formations.Radiometric dating isn't proving much about super old anything, because the equation requires 2 unknown variables and 1 possible variable, where 1 unknown is being assumed (the starting amount of radioactivity), another assumes the rate of decay is constant even though unverified. Basic algebra.
curtis12375 2 weeks ago
@curtis12375 Everyone knows the earth is old except fuddymentalists.
gregrutz 2 weeks ago
@gregrutz 6000 or so years is pretty old, isn't it?
curtis12375 2 weeks ago
@curtis12375 The earth is 4,545,000,000 years old. 6000 is not even close.
gregrutz 2 weeks ago
@gregrutz How would you like to back up your claim? Or does your claim have the same lack of validity that you guys seem convinced his claim does? I don't have a theory of the age of the Earth, nor universe. I can work a math problem like nobody's business, though. So what supports your assessment of the age of the Earth?
curtis12375 2 weeks ago
@curtis12375 GEOLOGY ! The ‘Super Group’ of rocks in the Grand Canyon is below the level layers at the east end. These layers were laid down level, block faulted into mountains [tilted], worn flat, and then the Teapeats Sandstone was laid down over the basement layers. Then another 5000 feet of sediments was laid down, some wind blown desert sands, some corals. Then the whole area got raised to 8000 feet above sea level. Finally water flowing down hill cut the canyon. How long did this take
gregrutz 2 weeks ago
@gregrutz Did you observe this occurring? Do you know how it happened? Could.. I don't know... a large Flood, have caused large amounts of land to be moved, carrying distant soils and then the sheer weight of that much water over the moved/ moving soil caused a type of compacting that results in similar structures of the Earth? Could a HUGE Earthquake have forced up mountain ranges and caused a huge flood that all together caused these results with a false positive of sorts?
curtis12375 2 weeks ago
@curtis12375 No, floods don't move land. No, earthquakes don't move mountains that fast. No, water does not just appear and then 'recede'.
A flood would have left some evidence. There is none.
gregrutz 2 weeks ago
@gregrutz Do you say these things do not do as such because they lack the traits capable of causing such OR because ou have never witnessed them occurring?
curtis12375 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TruthUnadulterated It does not matter the amount of parent isotope becasue the calulate the age based on the ratio of parent to daughter atom.
In Carbon 14 dating they count the radioactive atoms left. It has a short enough time frame that it can be tested against known ages like the Egyptians over 4000 years ago. The oldest city dug up so far is 20,000 years old, dated with C14 method.
''irrelevent comments rather than demonstrating the evidence ''
NEED MORE EVIDENCE?
gregrutz 1 month ago
But as I pointed out most ppl on here give ad hominem attacks and other irrelevent comments rather than demonstrating the evidence and the logic behind it for yielding a long age. The fact is this. We all (creationist and evolutionist) agree on this: Radiometric dating more often than not provides large ages on rocks. They are contaminated by the environment. Collaboration methods are therefore used. These methods are derived from radiometric dating things that need collaboration, and so on...
TruthUnadulterated 1 month ago
@TruthUnadulterated ''Radiometric dating more often than not provides large ages on rocks. ''
Wrong, radiometric dating ALWAYS gives a date for an old earth.
BTW geologists knew the earth was millions of years old before nuclear chemists told them it was billions of years old.
gregrutz 1 month ago 7
Open the gate ! More lion food here !!
LionFoodFinder 1 month ago
physically looks smart but only smart ass... he is just completely brian washed by his book... smart enough to remove the rating because even he knows his video will be rated full red XD
Uranium1972 1 month ago
And the guy is not even a moon hoaxer, he accepts that we landed on the moon. It makes it even crazier. How can you accept that scientists know enough to make men walk on the moon yet at the same time they're so wrong about basic things like the age of the earth? It baffles me. If you really believe the earth is 6000 years old you have to be so batshit crazy that you shouldn't believe any goddamn thing about science, that aspirin doesn't work and planes don't fly.
Knr911 1 month ago
@Knr911 To be honest the evidence for landing on the moon is more conclusive than for determining the age of the earth--whether you're an evolutionist or not, that should be obvious. There are many who see a kind of circular reasoning with respect to dating the earth. The idea is this: for evolution to be true on earth, we NEED long ages. the dating methods are all effected by the environment and usually provide larger ages if something is wrong. Now here's the logical issue . . .
TruthUnadulterated 1 month ago
@TruthUnadulterated ... evryon agrees the earth is dynamic. If the earth was billions of years old and formed through accretion, including molten lava flows, etc, then right from the getgo the ages would appear larger than they are. Given billions of years and they DEFFINITELY will appear larger through decay rates with all environmental changes. That leaves no adequate collaborative methods that can be scarcely relied upon. If we get any short ages at all, then, the whole earth must be young.
TruthUnadulterated 1 month ago
@TruthUnadulterated One last thing to note. It means that even if we dont get young ages. If we can be nearly certain about anything, we can reasonably assume scientifically that the earth is considerably younger than the oldest dated rock on earth, NOT the same or older. How much younger would be up for debate.
TruthUnadulterated 1 month ago
@TruthUnadulterated If we get any short ages at all, then, the whole earth must be young. WHAT?
Ever dating method ever invented shows the earth is old. Tree rings go back 10,000 years with no sign of a flood.
gregrutz 1 month ago
@gregrutz Thanks for proving my point! 10,000 years is very young compared to evolutionist accounts of life on earth. Tell me, what exactly would be a sign of a flood on a tree? It seems to me that there are examples of trees that have been effected by some kind of flood and yet the evidence for it would not be accepted if not for the fact that it was observed. What's your evidence?
TruthUnadulterated 1 month ago
@TruthUnadulterated Dendrochronology or tree-ring dating is the scientific method of dating based on the analysis of patterns of tree-rings. Dendrochronology can date the time at which tree rings were formed, in many types of wood, to the exact calendar year. By overlapping tree rings going back in time you get an uniteruped 10,300 years of histoy of tree growing. So the earth is AT LEAST 10,300 years old and there hasn't been a global flood for at least 10,300 years. Get it now?
gregrutz 1 month ago
It's seems that YouTube is the hub for those who don't major in reasoning. Whether the commentors below agree with Venom or not, I've noticed that all the comments are either wrong, bad reasoning, or meaningless with respect to the arguments provided by Venomfangx. And to top it off, many succumb to name calling rather than providing evidence that can be critiqued. The Near Eastern accounts would suggest the age of the Earth to be still only a few thousand years, certainly not billions.
TruthUnadulterated 1 month ago
i dont wana go the fuck to outer space when i die!! shiiiiiiiit
xpvrx 1 month ago
This person drastically cherry picks, turns facts around, and misinterprets things to contradict scientific claims that are well documented and proved beyond any doubt. What a moron with a nerve!
Deadlyseriousmonkey 1 month ago
think about it like this, God created evolution and science followed after. evolution has A LOT of credible evidence. when you said the sun takes up too much hydrogen, all i have to say is it's called gravity dumbass.
brandeezy108 1 month ago
you're a fundamentalist and are still a monkey. humans have branched off of them due to EVOLUTION! we didn't come from monkeys. we evolved from them. damn fundamentalists can't even interpret the true meanings of the books in the bible. you're not supposed to take it all literally! making christianity look bad man. Jesus forgives you.
brandeezy108 1 month ago
Niether the Roman Catholics nor the Eastern Orthodox believe in Creationism or a 6000 year earht. Both ancient Churches accept evolution So 3/4 of christianity, that 1.5 Billion christians say this vemonfangx is a heretic and that's not including the Protestant that disagree with him. This Boy does not represent and majority or even large minority of christians. To use him to attack Christiany is a straw man. I am not accusing the uploader of doing this.What this Venom says is antichristian
JohnTheHutDweller 1 month ago
We have comets because stars explode
pandirasbox 1 month ago
2000 years of Sumerian history never happened?
pandirasbox 1 month ago
So the Sahara was never under water, the ice age never happened, and there was no flood of Noah. Makes sense.
pandirasbox 1 month ago
Augustine Jr. There are too many problems in Exodus and Joshua where the chronology drops off. 40 years is a sacred number and Hebrew idiom. Which Old Testament? Jewish or Samaritan? hahaha. The older accounts of Sumer and Egypt refute you buddy, so do the Hindus. All older religions.
pandirasbox 1 month ago
uh.
crimsoneternity 1 month ago
"The Christian religion is a parody on the worship of the sun, in which they put a man called Christ in the place of the sun, and pay him the adoration originally payed to the sun". -Thomas Paine-
rodhill25 1 month ago
Why weren't dinosaurs on the Ark?
rodhill25 1 month ago
If there is no resistance/ friction, how would a comet lose it mass? Isn't friction an opposing force against the forward movement of mass? I thought space was frictionless? And isnt the tail of a comet always pointing toward the sun?
rodhill25 1 month ago
perhaps Moses could have written , the world shall be 4004 years old when Jeus of nazerath is born in Bethleham. How hard would that have been for an omnipotent God to have dictated ?
Or even just a date on the 10 commandments.
SqueakerAlpha 1 month ago
I think we need to make reaction vids to Venomfangx's videos (like two girls one cup), its that bad. Here's a written script of my reaction:
hmm...oh hai its taht kid...ok he got that wrong, no big...hmm that's wrong too, ok...da fuuu? Ok, woow, and he says he knows science...*facepalm, *facepalm, *facepalm...omg, the fucks wrong with this kid?!...shut up shut up shut up! MY BRAIN!!!
njintau 1 month ago
At 5:40 this guy has totally forgotten any effects of the gravity! seriously..
makemesmile89 1 month ago
Open the gate ! Lion food here !!
LionFoodFinder 1 month ago
Creationism is a bad theory. It takes into paganism. Because it tells us that God created this world. This means that he is God of nature, which is wrong. God is the God of the people, not nature. This is false teaching. You are distanced yourself from the doctrine of Christian teachings. Your God is the essential shadow, not the strong personality of religious doctrine. Because traits that you give him any reasonable man can destroy with logic. God is inscrutable, and you expose it.
marusha16 1 month ago
lol some pretty mixed up maths (get a calculator n dont use the fingers..)
on one side he uses science to 'proove' that science is wrong? its like i proove that i have 11 fingers by counting down my left hand fingers from 10-9-8-7-6 then adding 5 to the 6 =11.
Fundamentalism is so easy to create - sad.
And sad thing is, that this ppl are allowed to vote some day..:(
WaterPipeGhost 1 month ago
ok let me start with a question, whats stupid+ignerant x retarded?...=''venomfangx'' or whatever the fuck hes colling himself.
ilike2wach 1 month ago
98% say it's 4.5 billion years old.
TheNutjar 1 month ago
This is a joke video right ???
If your serious, you are really fucked up
podoau 1 month ago
Here's an antidote to this bullshit: /watch?v=iGDrq8rikJc
If you put your preferred beliefs first, and try to retrofit science to it you're going to end up saying stupid things like this creationist. The proper way to go is to find out FIRST how the world is, and THEN formulate beliefs. It's how science works. You know, the stuff that gave us navigation, transistors, immunosupressants, the Haber-Bosch process, and the computers you're all reading this comment on. Science, not religion. Please.
LukeScientiae 2 months ago
What do they teach to kids in the US?!
Meresortsitar 2 months ago
@Meresortsitar yeah i know- makes us all look bad, but i assure you, most kids in the U S are not raised to babble this sort of stuff...we do teach evolution in public schools
Lily2U1515 1 month ago
This guy is fucking loopy
Spindry96 2 months ago
Adam to Jesus was about 4000 years? There's about 5000 years just to go from Adam to Enoch 7 generations. Then enoch was the father of Methuselah who was about 996. There's 6k already. In the year that methuselah died came noah's flood. Then they had to repopulate the earth
chopppacalamari 2 months ago
if i ever meet this freak i'd punch him right in his smug fucking face. he has no clue about anything. my 11 yr old niece knows more than this fucktard
84smokey 2 months ago
is this some sort of ironic art project?
frilansspion 2 months ago
Just confussed by religion
jpgleiden 2 months ago
^ ^ Worlds biggest troll ^ ^
MrArcadius7 2 months ago
this guy is robin!
Sanimangas 2 months ago
Fuck you faggot smoke some more Crack
MrKrazybudz 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
if the universe is less than 10000 years old, how can astrological objects be found over 10000 lightyears away from us?
sindre101 2 months ago
I dont think he's being serious guys...
clickidyclack 2 months ago
@clickidyclack yeah he is serious....this is shaun....aka venomfangx. he is a creationist youtuber you by the way was caught scamming donations and had to make a public apology on youtube for stealing donations. he still makes videos and hes still a moronic idiot.
420simpson 2 months ago
@420simpson "yeah he is serious....this is shaun....aka venomfangx"
That explains it.. I thought he left YT in disgrace..
I guess there is no keeping a good loony down
podoau 1 month ago
His kung fu is soooo much better than his science!! He is an indictment of the education system. How many scientific errors can you make in 10 minutes?
aden302000 2 months ago
Comment removed
aden302000 2 months ago
Smart man... Everyone needs to kill their tv
adam3176 2 months ago
Nasa is a lie.. media is a lie.. evolution is a lie..
adam3176 2 months ago
The sun also uses it's own energy to re-energize itself... did you think about that?
CyborgSmurf 2 months ago
its funny this guy tries to disprove science by using science lmao, and is arrogant enough to believe that his virtually no understanding of the subject qualifies him to claim that scientists that have spent their live proving their idea/theories or disproving others is incorrect. And then he claims religion makes you humble. The sheer irony!
JKTProductionzIncNCo 2 months ago
If evolution is wrong then evolution is wrong, it does not mean that god created us...
ebm93nor 2 months ago
good trolling, you can't be that strupid
metal395 2 months ago
He's not very bright, so don't be too hard on him. He's kind of cute though. Perhaps he'll get some new intuition when he finally gets laid? ....
glutinousmaximus 2 months ago
Is he a retard?
fhsoder 2 months ago 30
@fhsoder that's the wrong question. What you should be asking is why didn't his parents get an abortion? oh wait...
JKTProductionzIncNCo 2 months ago
@fhsoder nah, poor guy just brainwashed :-/
CyborgSmurf 2 months ago 28
@CyborgSmurf then what does that make you????
Atman179 1 month ago
@Atman179 It makes me not being ignorant.
CyborgSmurf 1 month ago
@fhsoder
Yes. Without a doubt.
TheLogicStick 1 month ago
@fhsoder yes he is
wanafly12 1 month ago
lmao..
TheJDorian 2 months ago
Is that Kirk Cameron's son? I'm just curious. He looks/sounds a lot like him. But if it is Cameron's kid, it's funny because the kid looks the same age as his old man.
Noromongrel 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
you're great. ^.^ thanks for this =)
SirenNmermaid 2 months ago
I believe in a giant brain living inside Mars. If you need proof I will tell you that you just need to believe it to understand it. It is behind all creation and The MarsBrain has never written a book because it wants us people to believe by faith and not by words. You have to feel it like I do. Try to disprove me. You cant disprove it, but I can prove it to you... all you have to do is to take a leap of faith. LOL
CyborgSmurf 2 months ago
@CyborgSmurf nah man the flying spaghetti monster
JKTProductionzIncNCo 2 months ago
so Noah became like 900 years old?
CyborgSmurf 2 months ago
I dont think people with a low iq can comprehend basic physics like this. Like when distance is measured in light years (the distance light travels in one year) and a star is more than 6000 lightyears away, we wouldn be able to see the star if the light from it was created after 6000 years ago.. The reason why (smart) people only THINK the universe is 13,7 billion years is because thats how far out we can observe. Also how would you explain trees that have turned to stone in 6000 years?
normate 2 months ago
l like this boy he tells the truth of where we came from and who created us.
that is cool.
lovesack 2 months ago