For complex multiplications this should be the easier method because it's easier to double, halve and add than it is to successive row multiplications with carrying and then adding them all together.
It's also a cool challenge to program this algorithm.
@gpardhu yeah, they designed it so that peasants would do worse and take longer, which is much more clever than damaging the masses. They dumb down the material in the midwest as well compared to the east coast. It's amazing. With us, they don't teach us methods. They give us plain information. Unfortunately, that has caused some of us to creatively make links.
Some people don't realize that the whole point is it's doing multiplication without a times table, just using addition. "Doubling" can be done without multiplication just by adding a number to itself.
If you'd never learned your times tables, how would you find 17 * 22? Not as fast as this, I'd bet.
Neat. But, watching all these math videos and different methods, ultimatly I ask myself one question: can you use this method to do algebra and higher level math. If the answer is no, then you'll have to learn the old method anyway.
In soviet russia multiplication, number multiply you!
RaNd0mPiXeLs 1 week ago
For complex multiplications this should be the easier method because it's easier to double, halve and add than it is to successive row multiplications with carrying and then adding them all together.
It's also a cool challenge to program this algorithm.
kray97 4 months ago
Because someone is more likely to remember this method than to remember to carry a calculator
SnowofLight 7 months ago
This is the old babylonian method of multipling, there are some tables proving that...
raduborza 8 months ago
This is like the Egyptian method.
returnoftheramble3 1 year ago
They taught me to make grids in math, and I have a bunch of methods for simple things. I could make everyone retarded.
returnoftheramble3 1 year ago
hum multiply cheyyan ithra kashtapedandallo..!
vere pani onnumillaa
theNijool 1 year ago
just look at where I pulled the digits. Like, 6X2=12 then this 1+2=3 then +2 blah blah
returnoftheramble3 1 year ago
1622=352 6X2=12 3+2 =5 2+1=3 352
1722=374 7X2=14 5+2=7 2+1=3 374
1822=396 8X2=16 7+2=9 2+1=3 396
blah, blah
20X22 484 10X2=20 2+2=4 2+2=4 440
You can make it as annoying as you want to.
returnoftheramble3 1 year ago
brilliant video!!!
dominicrules1 2 years ago
ah need better subtitles! good though
DomFinn 2 years ago
how do you do it the three numbers
burnedPaper 2 years ago
Its too bad you can hardly hear him. He should put the audio through a noise filter and re-post it.
ArcaneInquisitor 2 years ago
I guess it's just the way you think about it and what you were using it for.
forgotmypassword3 2 years ago
that's what ALU is doing, non EECS ppl are just so @@.
eligao 2 years ago
amazing
Vybertastic 3 years ago
mumble mumble mumble mumble mumble mumble
nullclean 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
math is a butthole
enetick 3 years ago
usual multiplication takes lesser time
gpardhu 3 years ago
@gpardhu yeah, they designed it so that peasants would do worse and take longer, which is much more clever than damaging the masses. They dumb down the material in the midwest as well compared to the east coast. It's amazing. With us, they don't teach us methods. They give us plain information. Unfortunately, that has caused some of us to creatively make links.
returnoftheramble3 1 year ago
this is mean video. this video helped meh heaps!!
74jockj6 3 years ago
Some people don't realize that the whole point is it's doing multiplication without a times table, just using addition. "Doubling" can be done without multiplication just by adding a number to itself.
If you'd never learned your times tables, how would you find 17 * 22? Not as fast as this, I'd bet.
Cosmologicon 3 years ago
What the heck? Wow they sure took the long way...
supergsx 3 years ago 2
Otchen Xopocho
opheric333 3 years ago
Neat. But, watching all these math videos and different methods, ultimatly I ask myself one question: can you use this method to do algebra and higher level math. If the answer is no, then you'll have to learn the old method anyway.
hack451 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
so useless.
arcaninetyyt 4 years ago
JUST AWSOME
berkut2006 4 years ago 2
and now you know why they were peasants, they used an ass backwards algorithm to do basic mathematics. Neat trick but not very functional.
FA2A 4 years ago
It's a binary computer way to do a multiplication with integer numbers.
22 is 16 + 4 + 2 = 2^4 + 2^2 + 2^1 = (bin) 10110
17 is 16 + 1 = 2^4 + 2^1 = (bin) 10001
Try using 17 instead of 22 to divide by 2, you will get a sum of 2 numbers (22 + 22*16), not 3 (17*2 + 17*4 + 17*16).
newcoleco 4 years ago 6
lol i never knew that... thats cool
teegrinsays 4 years ago