04:37... if what you say is right then why having the master fader at all? I`m using Reason and if my master volume is in the red I bring it down because it requires the least effort and does the same thing...
@SkeletinProductions Using lossless codecs in between the mixing and mastering stages is simply not the way it is done in the professional world. Most professional mastering engineers would much prefer a wave file as there has typically been no conversion done on it (ie: data compression), plus wave files have the ability to be saved at high bit depths (24bit, 32bit float), and high sample rates (96kHz, 192kHz), meaning that you are loosing very little quality from the mix.
@CuddleOscar In Ableton for example, you select the first channel, hold shift and then select the last channel. Or alternatively, you select one channel, hold Ctrl and select other individual channels.
@ Area593Studio Hi mate, I do a lot of stuff with samples, particularly layering drum loops, I produce really very complex tracks. I throw in lots of glitchy sounds & spot fx. I use literally 100's of tracks in a recording, so mastering gets hectic. I was just hoping you might have some tips on mastering tracks like this, or could point me to a tutorial that deals with mastering parts that are made with multiple sounds.. Cheers!
@jericho667 Yes it is OK to compress individual channels. Just bear in mind that typically a mastering engineer can do a better job on a track if the overall dynamic range of the track is still there (note "overall"), allowing them to use higher quality tools to bring up the final levels with less chance of introducing artifacts.
@sitcomsidekick It would make much more sense to just lower all of the individual channels / busses that are feeding into the master channel, although if that proves too difficult then using the return could be a work around.
I would seriously avoid using limiting in that situation however, as you will be removing dynamic range that can then make the mastering process more difficult and you may also introduce artifacts into the sound, which can't always be removed during mastering.
@Area593Studio can i ask a question, how loud should my overall mix be if its going to be mastered..... ????? like -3db or -5db. how much head room i should leave basically?
@AppA iZotope Ozone provides an analyzer and EQ in one screen. As for panning I'd recommend using a combination of your DAWs panning controls with a phase analyser like the one in Waves' Paz, or Ozone.
The last thing is dithering. Limiting should never be used in the mastering process, typically multi-band compression or maximisation will yield much better results than limiting.
thanks!
ThyraiMedia 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Did you bought ALL the VST Plug Ins?? :O Or just downloaded it?
6196Ruben 2 months ago
i had to sub you dude, your vids are very professional! good stuff, keep it up
wrathallll 2 months ago
I buy softwear for do this for me, why think too much yeah? Only enjoy my sound!
MRHDOTCOM1 2 months ago
you helped alot with that master fader part, some one told me to pull it down if its clipping and pull it up if its not enough.....
lowedv 3 months ago
thanks mate!
djbigdk 3 months ago
04:37... if what you say is right then why having the master fader at all? I`m using Reason and if my master volume is in the red I bring it down because it requires the least effort and does the same thing...
5m1nutes 4 months ago
What mis wrong with lossless compression on files. Since they are lossless.
SkeletinProductions 5 months ago
@SkeletinProductions Using lossless codecs in between the mixing and mastering stages is simply not the way it is done in the professional world. Most professional mastering engineers would much prefer a wave file as there has typically been no conversion done on it (ie: data compression), plus wave files have the ability to be saved at high bit depths (24bit, 32bit float), and high sample rates (96kHz, 192kHz), meaning that you are loosing very little quality from the mix.
Area593Studio 5 months ago
@FingerstyleTV No. Its only temp compression and ZIP files can't even compress WAV files that much.
rainbowbowserpow9999 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If anyone need mastering hit me shaung310@aol.com i only charge $15 a song also check out my site scholacreations com
TheSchola3000 5 months ago
@FingerstyleTV No, not at all; as the engineer or whoever will use the track has to de-compress (unzip) it first.
thenamesdave 6 months ago
How do you grab all the channels at once???
CuddleOscar 6 months ago
@CuddleOscar In Ableton for example, you select the first channel, hold shift and then select the last channel. Or alternatively, you select one channel, hold Ctrl and select other individual channels.
Area593Studio 5 months ago
@ Area593Studio Hi mate, I do a lot of stuff with samples, particularly layering drum loops, I produce really very complex tracks. I throw in lots of glitchy sounds & spot fx. I use literally 100's of tracks in a recording, so mastering gets hectic. I was just hoping you might have some tips on mastering tracks like this, or could point me to a tutorial that deals with mastering parts that are made with multiple sounds.. Cheers!
MrLittletomdj 11 months ago
Superb tutorial man, a real help.
MrDarkBliss 1 year ago
@MrDarkBliss Thanks
Area593Studio 5 months ago
Great Tutorial! I'm a new wanna be Eddie Kramer. Youtube has been such a wonderful tool for learning.
NicroticSouls 1 year ago
@NicroticSouls Thanks! Keep practicing and you'll be as good as Eddie some day!
Area593Studio 5 months ago
nice and concise... thank you and keep them coming ;)
multisonus 1 year ago
it's ok if I use compression/limiting just on the single tracks before mastering?
jericho667 1 year ago
@jericho667 Yes it is OK to compress individual channels. Just bear in mind that typically a mastering engineer can do a better job on a track if the overall dynamic range of the track is still there (note "overall"), allowing them to use higher quality tools to bring up the final levels with less chance of introducing artifacts.
Area593Studio 5 months ago
@sitcomsidekick It would make much more sense to just lower all of the individual channels / busses that are feeding into the master channel, although if that proves too difficult then using the return could be a work around.
I would seriously avoid using limiting in that situation however, as you will be removing dynamic range that can then make the mastering process more difficult and you may also introduce artifacts into the sound, which can't always be removed during mastering.
Area593Studio 1 year ago
Good video, very in depth. Thank you so much!
zerosoma33 2 years ago
@zerosoma33 Thanks for your comment!
Area593Studio 5 months ago
@Area593Studio can i ask a question, how loud should my overall mix be if its going to be mastered..... ????? like -3db or -5db. how much head room i should leave basically?
lowedv 3 months ago
Thanks for making dithering clearer.
(Benson and Tonic)
nblfyb 2 years ago
@nblfyb No worries, glad to help!
Area593Studio 5 months ago
That PAZ Analyzer seems to be just what I need!
Is there also plugin which has a combination of analyzer and equalizer (with regards to panning as well) ?
AppA 2 years ago
@AppA iZotope Ozone provides an analyzer and EQ in one screen. As for panning I'd recommend using a combination of your DAWs panning controls with a phase analyser like the one in Waves' Paz, or Ozone.
Area593Studio 5 months ago
Many tnxs for this one.......learned a lot, this is a great tutorial......
0rquesm 2 years ago
@0rquesm Thanks for the comment!
Area593Studio 5 months ago
Thanks
joesimmons90 2 years ago
The last thing is dithering. Limiting should never be used in the mastering process, typically multi-band compression or maximisation will yield much better results than limiting.
Area593Studio 2 years ago
A good tutorial for the beginners mate :)
What's the last thing, limiting or dithering ? Thanks.
AnskeOfficial 2 years ago