>>>> WARNING: Don't waste your time debating with --------> "RetSquid."
He's either a paid dis-info agent of the government and/or the central banking cartel, or he's simply a jack-off cheerleader for Slavery Inc.
Scroll through the old comments from this video and MANY others like it, and you'll see he's been trolling them for up to 4 YEARS. He only trolls sovereignty and tax protestor videos. Strange, don't you think?
"We combined CBD and THC in culture dishes, aggressive Brain Cancer cells. Found a Synergistic improvement in the ability to THC not only to inhibit the growth but cause programmed cell death. We found specific Molecular Mechanisms that might explain why combining the 2 compounds makes a more efficient treatment. Data suggests compounds to be active you must use a high concentration (Rick Simpson's Cancer Cure ALL Hemp Oil) you WON'T be able by smoking it."
Here's how I see it. Those who desire freedom are a class. The government's anti-Sovereign'Freeman rhetoric slandering in the media, we who want to hold THEM accountable, by labeling us as "anti-government extremists, right-wing wackos and fringe lunatics" is nothing short of a hate crime. We should seek an attorney (with balls) who can co-counsel a class (Sovereigns) action lawsuit or file hate crime charges against the U.S. GOVERNMENT. We are the injured party. Spread the word. Let's go!
IT would seem that these EXECUTIVE ORDERS ARE in repugnency of the Constitution of The United States Republic. Can we say Constitutional Law and American Jurisprudence? Lets' consider EXECIVE ORDER 11110 NOW THAT ORDER IS IN ORDER AND in line with American Jurispridence and non repugnent.
Vatican- NAZIS- SocialistsCFR (luciferian jews) run the world. The Globalist, the international bankers, secret societies, organized religions ruled by an elite bloodline, same bloodline ruling from Egypt 2 Rome 2 British (European) Empire 2 now American Empire (1913 Fed Reserve). Presidents & Kings stand at whim of the real power which is the priest hood (Priests - Bishops - Cardinals - Pope) standing behind the throne - trying to form it's one world luciferian gov't
I am not a true believer of the Redemption approach to having no 'debt' by using my 'strawman' account to pay for anything. I am a true common law freeman, where I am responsible in every way for myself and pay my debts with my labor. Without comprehension of what the attorneys have crafted in their deceit and trickery, one cannot have any appreciation for why the situation is what it is, and how it got this way.Without the fraud of the Bankers, life would be incredibly better.No IRS nuff said
If you don't believe in the Redemption approach to pay off your debts, please tell me what practical applications are possible with this knowledge. Thanks.
@justiceformen That there is no money, everything is fictional. I am a common law freeman and the Bank can't prove it lent me any money, they can't by law lend their own credit, so what value did they give me?? I don't owe any debt if no value was received. The judges will never allow this info to come out under testimony in court or they will 'seal the case'. I can't prove I have a treasury account to pay off debts, but I can prove they didn't give constitutional lawful tender Art.1,8&10
@justiceformen Yes in a credit card matter against my daughter. Atty couldn;'t produce a power of atty,; license to practice law, written contract, evidence of money had, or an acct stated. Judge couldn't produce evidence of the form of law being adjudicated, evidence of no conflict of interest, represented the Bank by denying a NOTICE AND DEMAND to DISMISS with no oppositon from the Bank, so I swore a complaint for mainaining a fraudulent suit. Atty didn't answer discovery, or a Subpeona
I studied this constantly for a couple of years. I have been fortunate enough to meet true leaders in comprehension of this material and thru their wisdom and my intuition came to my understanding of it. I try and provide actual evidence to support my allegations as I don't want anyone to take my "opinion" as truth, but instead research it on their own. Without your own study, you will have no true faith in your knowledge.
Wow. Managed to bear minutes 2-5, and am now seriously regretting it. They should put you in the Supreme Court, it might help the world to see just how retarded some Americans are. What are your legal qualifications? Do you have any peer reviewed journal articles? Where did you do your study that made you such an authority on land and tax law? Blackstone and Locke would be turning in their grave.
I couldn't make it past 2 minutes without wanting to kill myself. I think England needs to reclaim our common law system from you, you clearly can't handle it. I cannot even begin to believe the level of legal ignorance displayed even within the first 2 minutes. It physically makes my brain hurt.
@pascalyuiop I always enjoy a good comment with points and authorities to back up the opinions shared by noble men? like you. Thank you for being interested an engaging in comment. I like common law and dont like the Bills of Attainder and Pains and Penalties that pass for law today.
@RetSquid According to you? That must be why they refuse to address anything to you in your uppercase/lowercase name when dealing with any government or corporate agency right? That screwy IRS just refuses to address my in the name I go by, even after being corrected. The courts refuse to change the name of the defendant to upper and lower case even after you notice them that you are not that name JOHN DOE and it is a misnomer to use it.
"...because the manner in which plaintiff’s name is spelled, printed, or punctuated on filings in this case does not, in the court’s view, impact on the substance of the pleadings, the court denies plaintiff’s motions to strike as meritless.”
Hillman v. Secretary of Treasury
"The difference between the fully capitalized and the first-letter capitalized versions of the Defendants’ names is immaterial, and provides no defense to the claims asserted by the Government.”
>>>> WARNING: Don't waste your time debating with --------> "RetSquid."
He's either a paid dis-info agent of the government and/or the central banking cartel, or he's simply a jack-off cheerleader for Slavery Inc.
Scroll through the old comments from this video and MANY others like it, and you'll see he's been trolling them for up to 4 YEARS. He only trolls sovereignty and tax protestor videos. Strange, don't you think?
BRYAN351 1 month ago
Bob Marley 101
"We combined CBD and THC in culture dishes, aggressive Brain Cancer cells. Found a Synergistic improvement in the ability to THC not only to inhibit the growth but cause programmed cell death. We found specific Molecular Mechanisms that might explain why combining the 2 compounds makes a more efficient treatment. Data suggests compounds to be active you must use a high concentration (Rick Simpson's Cancer Cure ALL Hemp Oil) you WON'T be able by smoking it."
Dr. McAllister
EssiacHempLaetrile 2 months ago
After FDR, Banned gold in 33. . . .didn't the wizard of OZ come out in 39?? Makes u think
Kbsantangelo 2 months ago
@Kbsantangelo the movie was based on the book written well before 1933
cdimmm 2 months ago
Here's how I see it. Those who desire freedom are a class. The government's anti-Sovereign'Freeman rhetoric slandering in the media, we who want to hold THEM accountable, by labeling us as "anti-government extremists, right-wing wackos and fringe lunatics" is nothing short of a hate crime. We should seek an attorney (with balls) who can co-counsel a class (Sovereigns) action lawsuit or file hate crime charges against the U.S. GOVERNMENT. We are the injured party. Spread the word. Let's go!
AceOfHeart2012 6 months ago 2
IT would seem that these EXECUTIVE ORDERS ARE in repugnency of the Constitution of The United States Republic. Can we say Constitutional Law and American Jurisprudence? Lets' consider EXECIVE ORDER 11110 NOW THAT ORDER IS IN ORDER AND in line with American Jurispridence and non repugnent.
firefox8192 7 months ago
Vatican- NAZIS- SocialistsCFR (luciferian jews) run the world. The Globalist, the international bankers, secret societies, organized religions ruled by an elite bloodline, same bloodline ruling from Egypt 2 Rome 2 British (European) Empire 2 now American Empire (1913 Fed Reserve). Presidents & Kings stand at whim of the real power which is the priest hood (Priests - Bishops - Cardinals - Pope) standing behind the throne - trying to form it's one world luciferian gov't
truthknowledge. Com
MopDMTBARTL 11 months ago
I am not a true believer of the Redemption approach to having no 'debt' by using my 'strawman' account to pay for anything. I am a true common law freeman, where I am responsible in every way for myself and pay my debts with my labor. Without comprehension of what the attorneys have crafted in their deceit and trickery, one cannot have any appreciation for why the situation is what it is, and how it got this way.Without the fraud of the Bankers, life would be incredibly better.No IRS nuff said
immafreemann 1 year ago 8
@immafreemann
Slightly off topic here, but how would I get hold of Bill Thornton's 9 hour video program?
justiceformen 9 months ago
@immafreemann
If you don't believe in the Redemption approach to pay off your debts, please tell me what practical applications are possible with this knowledge. Thanks.
justiceformen 3 months ago
@justiceformen That there is no money, everything is fictional. I am a common law freeman and the Bank can't prove it lent me any money, they can't by law lend their own credit, so what value did they give me?? I don't owe any debt if no value was received. The judges will never allow this info to come out under testimony in court or they will 'seal the case'. I can't prove I have a treasury account to pay off debts, but I can prove they didn't give constitutional lawful tender Art.1,8&10
immafreemann 3 months ago
@immafreemann
Thanks! Have you ever done exactly that?
Thanks again,
Earl
justiceformen 3 months ago
@justiceformen Yes in a credit card matter against my daughter. Atty couldn;'t produce a power of atty,; license to practice law, written contract, evidence of money had, or an acct stated. Judge couldn't produce evidence of the form of law being adjudicated, evidence of no conflict of interest, represented the Bank by denying a NOTICE AND DEMAND to DISMISS with no oppositon from the Bank, so I swore a complaint for mainaining a fraudulent suit. Atty didn't answer discovery, or a Subpeona
immafreemann 3 months ago
I studied this constantly for a couple of years. I have been fortunate enough to meet true leaders in comprehension of this material and thru their wisdom and my intuition came to my understanding of it. I try and provide actual evidence to support my allegations as I don't want anyone to take my "opinion" as truth, but instead research it on their own. Without your own study, you will have no true faith in your knowledge.
immafreemann 1 year ago 2
@immafreemann you are an excellent inspiration to others.. thank you..
SovereignBeing 11 months ago
Thanks... How did you find / figure this out?
OCSnowBoarder 1 year ago
@pascalyuiop, the manner in which you commented has in fact made me ascertain this information even more relevant. Thank you.
lannlann 1 year ago
Wow. Managed to bear minutes 2-5, and am now seriously regretting it. They should put you in the Supreme Court, it might help the world to see just how retarded some Americans are. What are your legal qualifications? Do you have any peer reviewed journal articles? Where did you do your study that made you such an authority on land and tax law? Blackstone and Locke would be turning in their grave.
pascalyuiop 1 year ago
I couldn't make it past 2 minutes without wanting to kill myself. I think England needs to reclaim our common law system from you, you clearly can't handle it. I cannot even begin to believe the level of legal ignorance displayed even within the first 2 minutes. It physically makes my brain hurt.
pascalyuiop 1 year ago
@pascalyuiop I always enjoy a good comment with points and authorities to back up the opinions shared by noble men? like you. Thank you for being interested an engaging in comment. I like common law and dont like the Bills of Attainder and Pains and Penalties that pass for law today.
immafreemann 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I see that many of you have questions, or information to share like this, and a lot of those question can be answered at:
. w w w (dot) SovereignFilings (dot) c o m
. This is also a place that you can share your ideas as well.
zujilin2 1 year ago
great video. thank you
benlowreyhimself 1 year ago
@RetSquid According to you? That must be why they refuse to address anything to you in your uppercase/lowercase name when dealing with any government or corporate agency right? That screwy IRS just refuses to address my in the name I go by, even after being corrected. The courts refuse to change the name of the defendant to upper and lower case even after you notice them that you are not that name JOHN DOE and it is a misnomer to use it.
immafreemann 1 year ago
"...because the manner in which plaintiff’s name is spelled, printed, or punctuated on filings in this case does not, in the court’s view, impact on the substance of the pleadings, the court denies plaintiff’s motions to strike as meritless.”
Hillman v. Secretary of Treasury
"The difference between the fully capitalized and the first-letter capitalized versions of the Defendants’ names is immaterial, and provides no defense to the claims asserted by the Government.”
US v. Glen H. Stinson
RetSquid 1 year ago
So far, so good! On to Part 2...
nameofthepen 1 year ago 2
@nameofthepen i have to agree :)
lovinit19791 1 year ago