Mitt Romney top 3 donors: Goldman Sachs - $521,180 / JPMorgan Chase & Co - $356,400 / Morgan Stanley - $297,550
Ron Paul Top 3 Donors: US Army - $81,423 / US Air Force - $60,739 / US Navy - $58,267 (these are all actual donations from the individual soldiers).
Ron Paul gets more military donations that all other republican candidates combined. I will support our troops - Ron Paul 2012. Source: opensecrets COPY AND PASTE THIS!
My Gaydar may not be very good, but Mitt looks homosexual to me. It's pretty easy to picture him dancing in a glitter thong and a white-feathered Indian-chief headdress in a St Patrick's Day parade
I'm sure he's lying but to hear a politician say "religion doesnt belong in politics" is amazing. They should all be like him. If you want to hate people, thats fine but dont be pushing it into politics and trying to make it law like Santorum does.
Ok, devils advocate for one second here; Why would a gay person wan't to get married anyway? Marriage is a religious promise to God. I know people have changed its meaning and such with civil partnerships and atheist wording but that's simply stupid. Would an atheist wan't to become or copy a priest? Equal rights are one thing (which I agree with 100%) but religions condemn homosexuality (unless you look at all the new age crystal waving ones made up by hippies trying to please everyone).
@MrEnterthehole So why would Gay people wan't to adopt a practice of an institute which doesn't like their actions? -Devils advocate- Don't go flaming me with sparkly hate ;P
@MrEnterthehole:"So why would Gay people wan't to adopt a practice of an institute which doesn't like their actions?"
-- Legal marriage is an "institute" of our government, which has no business liking or not liking its citizens' actions. Its only job is to assure all citizens have equal rights under the law. That includes marriage.
If you are trying to make some sort of broad point about religious marriage, then my pastor thinks you don't know what you're talking about. So does his husband.
@MrEnterthehole I think it's more the legal recognition and benefits offered to legally married couples. Gay marriage and legalization of marijuana are the two hurdles that will probably be green lighted just for the sake of focusing on more the important things.
@MrEnterthehole I agree that Marriage is a religious institution - being as such, the government should not recognize ANY marriage (but rather only 'Civil Unions'). But, that is never going to happen. Over the years, the term "Marriage" has developed two distinctly different meanings: 1) A union/promise to God, 2) A Union which is recognized by the government and is given tax/insurance benefits. This is why many gay people advocate for gay "Marriage" - using definition 2 above.
@MrEnterthehole Haven't you picked up on how important marriage is socially & culturally? Being "married" grants the pinnacle of recognition and respect for your relationship; it is the last, biggest, and final step, above dating and engagement. That's what it's about, in addition to legal benefits and rights. Try having your "partner" of many years be admitted to the ER and a nurse tell you that you must be immediate family or a spouse to make decisions & get to stay with them.
marriage is something between a man and a woman! gay people then come around and say hey i want to take part in that!! i say they should just call it something else not marriage!!!!!!!!
As an adult, I "get" it. But the Republican party is so fucked up if you look at it objectively. We send a message to kids saying things like "It gets better" and then you see people in power supporting ideas like this. Don't these Republicans see the opportunity to win the hearts of millions of people by creating unity between people? That's a power money can't buy, you know.
@lalaland13ish The purpose of marriage is to define the responsibilities and obligations of a couple with respect to procreation. Our legislature does not ban you from procreating, your creator does (God, Darwin or what/whomever else that may be). When you discover a means of procreating with a member of your own sex we should take up the issue of gay marriage as, perhaps, then it would apply to homosexuals.
@1975sld The purpose of marriage is to define the responsibilities and obligations of a couple with respect to procreation. Our legislature does not ban you from procreating, your creator does (God, Darwin or what/whomever else that may be). When you discover a means of procreating with a member of your own sex we should take up the issue of gay marriage as, perhaps, then it would apply to homosexuals.
@disposablefreedom (contd)... (c) it'll raise polygamous & incest marriage protests (d) since it's a psychiatric illness and perversion, it will justify for instance any marriage protest between a mother and her blood son with whom she is sexually in love, or between a man and a pussy cat that he loves and it loves him back.
@disposablefreedom "As far as not being able to be around someone with a compromised immune system.That..." Now who needs to further their learning (on punctuation)? "The real reason gay marriage makes so many social conservatives uncomfortable? Because it forces them to admit that marriage..." Blah blah blah 1. I'm not a social conservative 2. The actual reason gay "marriage" is a no-no is because (a) it's not marriage (b) gays suffer higher rates of S.T.D.'s (to be continued)
@disposablefreedom "As far as redefining the word marriage..I see nothing wrong in doing so..." You wouldn't see anything wrong because gays or gay supporters are confounded to be highly selfish and mostly ignorant. Marriage was founded and named by heterosexuals so it's about them, so homosexuals don't need to interfere as in changing it for themselves. However, homos haven't changed the real definition, instead they expanded it, attaching their own agenda.
Even though I don't fully agree with his opinion about gay marriage, I must take his side. That British guy was definetly influencing and manipulationg the conversation by interrupting him and asking annoying questions regarding his religious views. I felt like punching him in the face!
So let me get this straight. He opposes gay marriage because religion says so...but he says he wants to keep religion separate from his judgement as a leader. If it didnt know any better i would say that this notion IS A FUCKING PARADOX. You need to be really stupid or really evil to think any of this makes sense.
"Civil Union" is not equality. Marriage is. I don't want to force any priest or church to marry us if they don't want to. There are churches in America that do marry gay people, and that's fine by us. I wouldn't want to get married in a church by anybody who doesn't think they want to. But once again, "Civil Union" is not marriage...and that is our Right. And we won't force you to believe in it, force your priests & pastors & rabbi s to perform the ceremony. It is time for EQUAL RIGHTS!
The only thing President Obama has to do to be elected to a second tern is SHOW UP ON ELECTION DAY. Any Republican contenders have already self-destructed.
The probem with gay marriage is there is no problem. The probloem with Romny is that he has all positions on all issus. He's a well-oiled weather vane.
Politicians could not give a fuck less who marries who, they just hold these views to appeal to the homophobic vast majority of Americans. Politicians can only thrive if they mirror what the people want, and this is one of the problems with democracy... it doesn't matter at this point though, when the old generation dies and our generation is the vast majority of voters we wont give a fuck if gay people marry so it will past in time.
I don't understand why gays tenaciously seek marriage? What is wrong with civil institutions? Seriously marriage these days is such a failed and dying institution.
@gplus46: "I don't understand why gays tenaciously seek marriage?"
-- For the same reasons other people seek it, I imagine: legal protections for their families, a way to affirm to anyone they meet that they are a couple who are legally and socially responsible for one another in good times and bad, tens of thousands of dollars in government tax breaks over their lifetime. None of these are available through "civil institutions".
@gplus46:"why don't they fight for them to be acceptable in civil unions?"
-- Maybe for the same reasons black kids didn't "fight" to get better books and fewer roof leaks in their "colored" schools in the 1950's.
Parliaments and legislatures have been trying to make civil unions "equal" for over a decade and every one has failed. Why? Because "separate but equal" has NEVER been truly equal. And it never can be. The mere act of segregating people into a different class makes them unequal.
@juanjoseantoniopedro: "You devalue the Civil Rights movement every time you make the comparison."
-- If so, then I am in very good company:
"Marriage is one of the 'basic civil rights of man'" - U.S. Supreme Court, 1967
"The right to marry is not properly viewed simply as a benefit or privilege that a government may establish or abolish as it sees fit, but rather constitutes a basic civil or human right of all people." -- CA Supreme Court, 2008
@juanjoseantoniopedro Oh,but it is.It is exactly the same thing in comparison to treatment.As a psychologist, I have learned to look at this subject from an un bias view point.The only difference is the Civil Rights movement was won..The only difference in treatment is the black community could not hide (inherent color), The Gay community can,(sexuality) to an extent.To hide is to feel shame, to feel shame in being who you are,is the inability to be all you were meant to be.Sound familiar?
-- People get married for all sorts of reasons. Money and love are two of them. Tradition, parental or religious pressure, and a desire to be "exalted" in a "celestial" arrangement that will make them become gods and rule over alien planets.
But LEGAL marriage--the thing Mitt Romney is speaking about in the viedo--has none of these requirements.
what a coward. He knows that the mormon church considers homosexuality a sin but he doesnt want to look bad in front of the gay community. Fucking coward, lying piece of...
"I am not a spokesman for the Church." Funny, that isn't what the doctrine of the Mormon church says. I mean every member a missionary and missionaries are representatives of the Mormon church so as a member you are a representative of the Mormon church.
@rafaelg45 How? I was a Mormon missionary at one point in my life. I was told I represented the church and I was told by the church that I would be expected to answer peoples questions regarding the church. What is the difference between representative of the church and a spokesman? As a missionary I spoke for the church. Missionaries, for any religion speak for their religions and are thus spokesman. Saying that they are two different things doesn't accomplish anything.
@fabaum22 Yeah, the Greeks actually agreed that 'feeling' something should be embraced. And a 'marriage' back then was about property and not embarrassing each other, it didn't matter what sex you married. Shouldn't matter today either, it's like they don't affect your lives! And more important issues should be addressed, like global warming and the 3000 homeless children just in Indianapolis. OR the 26,000 that die a day from starvation. Gays getting married shouldn't even be an issue.
@XCyclonusX Actually that's incorrect. Even so, it doesn't mention anything about marriage in that story. IMO believing that the bible is legitimate history is foolish. I went to a Catholic private high school and a nun told me that the old testament is most definitely a concoction of bed time stories to get the kids to go to sleep and that taking the bible literally isn't what it's all about. People couldn't live to 900 yrs in the Bronze age, and they can't now.
@XCyclonusX Also, if you are a Christian, you believe that Jesus established the religion, and therefore happened thousands of years after the actual beginning of mankind. So that argument is null.
@duckcluck123 haha, yeah... but they're so close minded (well most of them; I don't wanna stereotype them into something that some of them aren't) and they don't listen to facts. It's kinda sad and it hinders our ability to make progress.
@crobexplosion Hahaha, of course they don't listen to facts. I was once a 11 years old sort of religious child who 'listened to Darwin', and then I was a 11 years old atheist. If you ignore logic in such a trivial thing, you might as well ignore everywhere else. And isn't Romney a mormon? If so, that's even worse.
Look, It's all stupid, who needs a peice of paper saying their married. If you love each other it shouldn't really matter. Also, marriage is a Christian event, its their right to deny gays to get married because it goes against what they believe. What society needs to do is make a new type of marriage called it a "Union" that is like a wedding, but doesn't come froma religious background.
-- There are about 2 billion Christians in the world, Kyle. Do you really think none of the other 5 billion ever get married?
Who needs a "stupid piece of paper"? Anyone who must make emergency medical decisions for a sick spouse. A veteran who wants to be buried next to his spouse like all other veterans. A widow who doesn't want to lose her family home just to pay the inheritance that married widows are exempt from. Your ignorance is astounding.
@hanohanonacowboy I didn't say the other 5 billion don't get married. And all the things you said you "need a piece of paper for" you can do without being married. Its simple, you have one group of people who in a sense "own" a ceremony with beliefs that directly conflict with gays participating in that ceremony. You can't tell jews how to have bar mitzvah's. Same concept applys here. I'm neither Christian, or oppose gay rights. It's just the truth.
@KyleMPulley : " I didn't say the other 5 billion don't get married."
-- Then you were just flat out wrong when you claimed that "marriage is a Christian event".
-- And no, a Massachusetts veteran couldn't be buried last year next to his husband in a Veteran's cemetery. It violates the Defense of Marriage Act. And no, a California widow is NOT exempt from inheritance tax when her wife dies, like any other widow is, for the same reason.
Try reading a paper before shooting off yer mouth.
@KyleMPulley: "you have one group of people who in a sense "own" a ceremony "
-- Christians do not "own" marriage in the same way that only Jews have bar mitzvahs. Jews marry. Muslims do, too. So do Hindus and people of no religious faith at all. Nor do all Christians deny marriage to same-sex couples.
You are either too proud or too ignorant to admit you simply don't know what you are talking about.
@hanohanonacowboy Your making a common mistake, yes Jews marry's but there religion is very similar to straight Christian. But lots of culture do not marry...They have ceremonies that represent the same thing, the joining of 2 people...but its not "marriage" that's just a term people use to summarize the type of ceremony. Marriage is a Christian ceremony. Christians don't believe in same sex partnerships, so it would be considered a disgrace to them and their traditions to have it happen.
@KyleMPulley Kyle, you are embarrassing yourself with your ignorance. The majority of world cultures marry. ALL countries on earth have laws regulating marriage. Not "ceremonies that represent the same thing". Marriage.
Marriage existed for thousands of years before Christianity existed. Many of the laws in the Old Testament have to do with regulating marriage; they were written at least 1500 years B.C. Jesus himself attended a wedding; the bride and groom were very definitely NOT Christian.
@hanohanonacowboy Not going to argue with you on bible facts...(ie horse shit) I really don't care what your paster, you, or anyone of faith thinks...because your all delusional
@KyleMPulley: "I'm neither Christian, or oppose gay rights.", "I really don't care what your paster, you, or anyone of faith thinks"
-- And you feel the need to post your expert opinions about marriage being a "Christian" ceremony and about what Christians do and don't believe. Pretty much the definition of talkin out yer ass.
@KyleMPulley Divorce just slides right on by unnoticed I guess? If tradition and Gods word is so important too these "Christians" then why allow divorce after a marriage? How does it go? "Therefore they are no more two, but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let not man put asunder." I guess it can be changed when it's beneficial to the majority..Hmmmm?
Hey, Prop 8 is unconstitutional..Period..The majority can not vote on a minority..To do so is bias and unethical. If this was the case, slavery would have been popular for a lot longer than it was.. :/
Dislike this comment all you want, but I believe that marriage is when a man and a woman comes together in legal and/ or holy unity. To me, if gay people want to get "married", then they should call it something else. That simple. In my opinion, homosexual "marriage" would be like trying to use Football rules in a Basketball games. It just doesn't make sense to me. Oh well. I'm ready for the bombardment of disagreeing comments.
Gays can't win. It's like the witch hunt in Old Salem. If they swim, they're witches and will be executed; if they sink, they were innocent, but now they're dead. Oh, well!
Gays are decried for living in promiscuity, but when they want to live in a monogamous marriage to a consenting adult to whom they are mutually attracted to, they are forbidden to marry.
You can't throw stink bombs and then complain about the smell.Anti-gay oppression stinks, and YOU are the cause of it!
(Stupid Journalist) All Romney know is that he needs there votes and his tax returns better be what he calculated and his chef is serving meat loaf, mush potatoes, corn, green beans and lemonade. (OK)
Using the argument that gay marriage would break the institution's tradition is a worthless one due to the fact that the definition of marriage has changed so many countless times over the centuries that it cannot actually be viewed as a consistent tradition.
Also, even if it was a tradition for a man and woman, that doesnt mean it is correct. With that logic someone could use an argument from tradition in the 60s to maintian racism.
I used to worry about Obama being re-elected, but now I think it's a very high probability since the two republican candidates are so extreme. Any sane person would still vote for Obama over crazy Romney and weirdo Santorum. God it's a freak show this year.
The only possible reason to oppose gay marriage is one of religious contention. So it's completely disingenuous to talk about 'separating personal faith from matters of leadership'.
What's really pathetic is that Romney says he wants to use a Constitutional amendment to remove the right to marry from citizens of his own state--the state where was governor for 4 years. He wants to pass a law to take Massachusetts couples who've been married for 7 years now and have them forcibly divorced against their will.
If this is the way this shameless hypocrite stands up for the citizens of his own state, how could anyone ever expect him to stand up for all Americans?
@Renagade1325 - yes, I travel all over the world for work ... parts of America are just as religiously fanatical as the most Muslim countries I have been to ... it is just another dogma that those parts of America are into ...
US ECONOMY COLLAPSED COS EUROPE CREATED EUROS. EUROS CREATED EUROS COS REPUBLICANS WERE FOCUSING ON LEWINSKI DRESS. POPULATION OF CHINA IS 1.4B, CHINA MADE THE WHOLE WORLD UNEMPLOYED. PALESTINE MUST MOVE TO HONG KONG. HONG KONG PEOPLE MUST MOVE TO MAIN LAND BY 2015. CHINA HAD A GOOD AGRICULTURE AND THEY BREED BOYS , THEY SEND GIRLS TO BE WHORES IN USA, UK, CANADA, AUSTRALIA, ETC. CHINA IS # 1 IN HUMAN TRAFFICKING. POPULATION OF USA IS ONLY 310 MLN,POPULATION OF CHINA IS 1.4B READ MY CHANNEL PLZ
We need to turn a corner in this country and get over this aversion to gay people. Romney & Santorum are religious kooks who work backwards from their ancient bibles. These are dangerous men.
@Sweence Id' rather have men that hold morals and actually attempt to serve a righteous god with fear and respect rather than a atheist leader who is lawless and doesn't believe in a god at all. By the way, if anyone is dangerous, it is surely Obama with all his corruption, scandals and socialist agenda that is putting America in debt for decades to come.
@cobra3385 Atheists are "Lawless"? Atheists have been the greatest contributors to scientific advancements and are the most philanthropic. Look at Warren Buffet, Bill Gates & George Clooney who donate billions to African charities with NO religious agenda. Also, an Atheist will NEVER fly a plane into a building or bomb an abortion clinic. Please take your head out of your ass.
@Sweence Don't forget Albert Einstein, Andrew Carnegie(also a philantropist), Pavlov, Sigmund Freud, Warren Buffet, Carl Sagan, George Carlin, Jesse Ventura, Steven Hawking, and Mark Zuckerberg(Facebook lol).
@Sweence Funny how they donate to Africa but yet won't donate a damn dime to the hard working middle class in America who actually deserve a real donation. Those men you mentioned are classic socialists thinkers who want too redistribute our wealth to foreign people that don't even deserve it, as ALL of them are Obama contributors. It's easy for them to get on camera and appear righteous with their phony donations but when the cameras off, see if you'll get a damn dime little American
@cobra3385 You're shifting the subject but allow me to straighten you out anyway. None of these men are socialist thinkers. Just good charitable human beings who earned their money because of capitalism. The situation in Darfur is more dire than anything in this country where lazy, spoiled shitheads play with their gadgets and pray to an imaginary man rather than getting off their asses and innovating.
@cobra3385 "Funny how they donate to Africa but yet won't donate a damn dime to the hard working middle class in America who actually deserve a real donation"
You know what's not funny at all, how you believe starving children don't deserve aid from the wealthy. You are what's wrong with this world. That is the complete opposite of what REAL Christians believe. If you're going to talk the talk, man up and walk the walk you coward. You are a disgrace to the Christian faith. You worship your flag
@Stefandurrr Putting a gun to people's heads and forcing them to cough up cash for your beliefs is not Christian either. Nor an act of freedom. It's tyranny. And there is no such thing as 'just tyranny'.
@Stefandurrr So now your a Christian all the sudden? Make up your mind. Well first of all I'm not Christian, I am a Jew. And second of all, your twisting my words to make it seem like it's a crime to donate to the poor as you completely missed the point. Religious institutions have done more for the poor than any self-serving athiest that puts on a act (most of them) for their charities. Just look at Bill Clinton and his Haitian fund as the haitians over there never saw the money.
@cobra3385 Look at what atheism has done to China and Russia and other countries. Atheist ran countries are always violating human rights with their abortions, redistribution of people's hard earned wealth to people that don't work (which is stealing) and robbing peopleof their freedoms and god-given liberties
@cobra3385 You're saying that Atheism caused China & Russia's problems? Are you kidding? Atheism isn't a religion any more than abstinence is a sexual position. Maniacal dictators who are also non-religious never killed anyone in the name of Atheism. They also happen to have mustaches but you wouldn't say that people with mustaches are prone to killing. It's an erroneous association commonly made by religious idiots.
@cobra3385 You're saying that Atheism caused China & Russia's problems? Are you kidding? Atheism isn't a religion any more than abstinence is a sexual position. Maniacal dictators who are also non-religious never killed anyone in the name of Atheism. They also happen to have mustaches but you wouldn't say that people with mustaches are prone to killing. It's an erroneous association commonly made by religious idiots.
@cobra3385 You're saying that Atheism caused China & Russia's problems? Are you kidding? Atheism isn't a religion any more than abstinence is a sexual position. Maniacal dictators who are also non-religious never killed anyone in the name of Atheism. They also happen to have mustaches but you wouldn't say that people with mustaches are prone to killing. It's an erroneous association commonly made by religious idiots.
He is such a shithead. anyone who morally controls you or me has no right to LIVE much less lead us. Stick to issues, not morals. fuck your stupid-ass religion.... almost nobody believes ANY of that shit anymore. Santa Claus and Jesus... same damn thing.
Mitt Romney needs to rely on his magic underwear, and leave the Presidency to someone who doesn't let thier religious views overshadow thier decisions for the majority, given the fact that me, and many, many, others like me don't have magic underwear to protect us..
@juanjoseantoniopedro THey're=They are, Their shows ownership, and there is a reference to place or position.. If I have made mistakes, and probably have with these terms, what can I say? I am only human, and I don't have time to be precise.. Maybe you should pay attention to punctuation in the future, just as I need to pay attention to propper termanology.. Just saying.. O_o
@juanjoseantoniopedro Last time I checked, we weren't in a spelling bee, or an English class..Youtube has become one huge debate.. Ethics, is where it pays off in the long run..
Is anyone still under the impression that the Republicans don't hate gay people? Is anyone still buying the cover story of "protecting the sanctity of marriage" or whatever elitist, racist, Christianist, homophobic propaganda they're spewing forth like sheer, concentrated stupid?
@JakobiaP If you truly are willing to look at Christianity with an open mind if provided with evidence, I encourage you to read "The Case for Christ." It's a book written about the experience of an atheistic journalist from Chicago that literally searched for evidence that there was (or wasn't) a God for 2 years. He came to a pretty interesting conclusion.
@MoonShoesPotter07 You shouldn't base Christians on people like this moron. To me, it sounds more like a troll that's trying to make Christians look stupid. While I don't agree with gay marriage, I don't believe marriage should be a part of government. Marriage started in religion and grew from there so it should stay there. Gay people should have the same legal rights as a married couple, but shouldn't get married.
I tend to not make sense sometimes, understand what I'm trying to say?
Actually, marriage existed long before Christianity. Just to let you know. :) Marriage is a legal contract more than anything, and if two consenting adults want to enter into that contract, by all means. Let them.
@DrewLandcaster Actually, The Bible begins at the creation of man, so the only thing before Chrstianity is God. Besides, people get married in church, seperate it from the state; that's all I'm saying.
Romney is a man of Morals and Character who will bring good morals to D.C. unlike BHO.
Romney 2012
LesterManio 6 hours ago
@LesterManio
Right on. Aren't you going to be excited when he is pres and we put all our money into finding planet Kolob? Only the great Kolob can save us now!
bosshog7169 5 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Mitt Romney top 3 donors: Goldman Sachs - $521,180 / JPMorgan Chase & Co - $356,400 / Morgan Stanley - $297,550
Ron Paul Top 3 Donors: US Army - $81,423 / US Air Force - $60,739 / US Navy - $58,267 (these are all actual donations from the individual soldiers).
Ron Paul gets more military donations that all other republican candidates combined. I will support our troops - Ron Paul 2012. Source: opensecrets COPY AND PASTE THIS!
TheFr3sh1 17 hours ago
My Gaydar may not be very good, but Mitt looks homosexual to me. It's pretty easy to picture him dancing in a glitter thong and a white-feathered Indian-chief headdress in a St Patrick's Day parade
dougcapehart 18 hours ago
rom's a dueche bag. equal employment opportunity but no equal marriage opportunity. weak sauce
TaylorNaomiMarie 23 hours ago
666 DISLIKES!
VhUgGz 1 day ago
I'm sure he's lying but to hear a politician say "religion doesnt belong in politics" is amazing. They should all be like him. If you want to hate people, thats fine but dont be pushing it into politics and trying to make it law like Santorum does.
iBoy2G 1 day ago
RELIGION conflicts with Logic. how can anyone govern a people when they have religious views on what is right & wrong?
What is more important for the advancement of a society-- religious beleif or pure logic?
masonTganes 1 day ago
RON PAUL 2012
yoitsdaman 1 day ago
what a scared little prick,
rosiewardd96 1 day ago
Lmao what a scared little bitch. Whats the matter Romney? Afraid your religious views might screw you out of votes?
Darkeyez86 2 days ago
Ok, devils advocate for one second here; Why would a gay person wan't to get married anyway? Marriage is a religious promise to God. I know people have changed its meaning and such with civil partnerships and atheist wording but that's simply stupid. Would an atheist wan't to become or copy a priest? Equal rights are one thing (which I agree with 100%) but religions condemn homosexuality (unless you look at all the new age crystal waving ones made up by hippies trying to please everyone).
MrEnterthehole 2 days ago
@MrEnterthehole So why would Gay people wan't to adopt a practice of an institute which doesn't like their actions? -Devils advocate- Don't go flaming me with sparkly hate ;P
MrEnterthehole 2 days ago
@MrEnterthehole "flaming on me with sparkly hate" - lol. That is awesome (coming from a gay guy)
MTUboi86 2 days ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrEnterthehole:"So why would Gay people wan't to adopt a practice of an institute which doesn't like their actions?"
-- Legal marriage is an "institute" of our government, which has no business liking or not liking its citizens' actions. Its only job is to assure all citizens have equal rights under the law. That includes marriage.
If you are trying to make some sort of broad point about religious marriage, then my pastor thinks you don't know what you're talking about. So does his husband.
hanohanonacowboy 1 day ago
@MrEnterthehole HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAhAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
UnadvisableCloud 21 hours ago
@MrEnterthehole I think it's more the legal recognition and benefits offered to legally married couples. Gay marriage and legalization of marijuana are the two hurdles that will probably be green lighted just for the sake of focusing on more the important things.
bkeels002 2 days ago
@bkeels002 Yup, you're most likely right.
MrEnterthehole 2 days ago
@MrEnterthehole I agree that Marriage is a religious institution - being as such, the government should not recognize ANY marriage (but rather only 'Civil Unions'). But, that is never going to happen. Over the years, the term "Marriage" has developed two distinctly different meanings: 1) A union/promise to God, 2) A Union which is recognized by the government and is given tax/insurance benefits. This is why many gay people advocate for gay "Marriage" - using definition 2 above.
MTUboi86 2 days ago
@MTUboi86 Sounds perfectly reasonable to me. :)
MrEnterthehole 2 days ago
@MrEnterthehole Haven't you picked up on how important marriage is socially & culturally? Being "married" grants the pinnacle of recognition and respect for your relationship; it is the last, biggest, and final step, above dating and engagement. That's what it's about, in addition to legal benefits and rights. Try having your "partner" of many years be admitted to the ER and a nurse tell you that you must be immediate family or a spouse to make decisions & get to stay with them.
AWickedMind 1 day ago
Ron Paul says it's not government business to have anything at all whatsoever with marriage. And that's the way it SHOULD be.
TexDad1971 2 days ago
marriage is something between a man and a woman! gay people then come around and say hey i want to take part in that!! i say they should just call it something else not marriage!!!!!!!!
milepaasi 2 days ago
As an adult, I "get" it. But the Republican party is so fucked up if you look at it objectively. We send a message to kids saying things like "It gets better" and then you see people in power supporting ideas like this. Don't these Republicans see the opportunity to win the hearts of millions of people by creating unity between people? That's a power money can't buy, you know.
Water4Jeremiah 3 days ago
so... banning gay marraige, preventing gays from having the same rights as everyone else... isnt discrimination??
i hate when homophobics pretend to not be homophobics
lalaland13ish 3 days ago 5
@lalaland13ish The purpose of marriage is to define the responsibilities and obligations of a couple with respect to procreation. Our legislature does not ban you from procreating, your creator does (God, Darwin or what/whomever else that may be). When you discover a means of procreating with a member of your own sex we should take up the issue of gay marriage as, perhaps, then it would apply to homosexuals.
camba063 2 days ago
So if his political views are separate from his faith..what exactly is his objection to same sex marriage?
1975sld 3 days ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@1975sld The purpose of marriage is to define the responsibilities and obligations of a couple with respect to procreation. Our legislature does not ban you from procreating, your creator does (God, Darwin or what/whomever else that may be). When you discover a means of procreating with a member of your own sex we should take up the issue of gay marriage as, perhaps, then it would apply to homosexuals.
camba063 2 days ago
Gay marriage is an issue!!!??? It is a shame that state founded on very noble principles was hijacked by wackos.
milekrizman 3 days ago
0:52 riiiiiiiggggghhhhttttt
Ferbguy101 3 days ago
@disposablefreedom (contd)... (c) it'll raise polygamous & incest marriage protests (d) since it's a psychiatric illness and perversion, it will justify for instance any marriage protest between a mother and her blood son with whom she is sexually in love, or between a man and a pussy cat that he loves and it loves him back.
uweretellingthetruth 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@disposablefreedom "As far as not being able to be around someone with a compromised immune system.That..." Now who needs to further their learning (on punctuation)? "The real reason gay marriage makes so many social conservatives uncomfortable? Because it forces them to admit that marriage..." Blah blah blah 1. I'm not a social conservative 2. The actual reason gay "marriage" is a no-no is because (a) it's not marriage (b) gays suffer higher rates of S.T.D.'s (to be continued)
uweretellingthetruth 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@disposablefreedom "As far as redefining the word marriage..I see nothing wrong in doing so..." You wouldn't see anything wrong because gays or gay supporters are confounded to be highly selfish and mostly ignorant. Marriage was founded and named by heterosexuals so it's about them, so homosexuals don't need to interfere as in changing it for themselves. However, homos haven't changed the real definition, instead they expanded it, attaching their own agenda.
uweretellingthetruth 3 days ago
Comment removed
uweretellingthetruth 3 days ago
Comment removed
uweretellingthetruth 3 days ago
@Briannegirl I appreciate your respect towards Romney. :)
mjacobson7 4 days ago
Mitt didn't realize that Pierce Morgan is gay. LOL
exbf22 4 days ago
Even though I don't fully agree with his opinion about gay marriage, I must take his side. That British guy was definetly influencing and manipulationg the conversation by interrupting him and asking annoying questions regarding his religious views. I felt like punching him in the face!
slim240293 4 days ago
@slim240293 I with you on this.
TheodoreMcFail 4 days ago
leftist claptrap. the socialists are doing everything to make Romney look bad
TheSteeletube 4 days ago
@TheSteeletube No... he does that himself!
nilsen93 4 days ago
So let me get this straight. He opposes gay marriage because religion says so...but he says he wants to keep religion separate from his judgement as a leader. If it didnt know any better i would say that this notion IS A FUCKING PARADOX. You need to be really stupid or really evil to think any of this makes sense.
xPurpleDrinkx9001 4 days ago
equal rights but not in marriage
PianoManiac321 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Why doesn't he flash his magic underwear?
saamohod 4 days ago
Comment removed
saamohod 4 days ago
Coward.
endofscene 4 days ago
"Civil Union" is not equality. Marriage is. I don't want to force any priest or church to marry us if they don't want to. There are churches in America that do marry gay people, and that's fine by us. I wouldn't want to get married in a church by anybody who doesn't think they want to. But once again, "Civil Union" is not marriage...and that is our Right. And we won't force you to believe in it, force your priests & pastors & rabbi s to perform the ceremony. It is time for EQUAL RIGHTS!
YosupMofo 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The only thing President Obama has to do to be elected to a second tern is SHOW UP ON ELECTION DAY. Any Republican contenders have already self-destructed.
The probem with gay marriage is there is no problem. The probloem with Romny is that he has all positions on all issus. He's a well-oiled weather vane.
zerogullibility 6 days ago
Politicians could not give a fuck less who marries who, they just hold these views to appeal to the homophobic vast majority of Americans. Politicians can only thrive if they mirror what the people want, and this is one of the problems with democracy... it doesn't matter at this point though, when the old generation dies and our generation is the vast majority of voters we wont give a fuck if gay people marry so it will past in time.
thelifeofbrian1 6 days ago
@thelifeofbrian1 that's why we don't live in a democracy
illahham 4 days ago
what a fucking tool!
dieselsoured 6 days ago
I wonder when he chose to be heterosexual....
xlonglostlotrelf 6 days ago
@xlonglostlotrelf LOL! When he was inducted into the church of Wackos.
KwellingtonK 6 days ago
I don't understand why gays tenaciously seek marriage? What is wrong with civil institutions? Seriously marriage these days is such a failed and dying institution.
gplus46 6 days ago
@gplus46: "I don't understand why gays tenaciously seek marriage?"
-- For the same reasons other people seek it, I imagine: legal protections for their families, a way to affirm to anyone they meet that they are a couple who are legally and socially responsible for one another in good times and bad, tens of thousands of dollars in government tax breaks over their lifetime. None of these are available through "civil institutions".
hanohanonacowboy 6 days ago
@hanohanonacowboy
why don't they fight for them to be acceptable in civil unions?
gplus46 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gplus46:"why don't they fight for them to be acceptable in civil unions?"
-- Maybe for the same reasons black kids didn't "fight" to get better books and fewer roof leaks in their "colored" schools in the 1950's.
Parliaments and legislatures have been trying to make civil unions "equal" for over a decade and every one has failed. Why? Because "separate but equal" has NEVER been truly equal. And it never can be. The mere act of segregating people into a different class makes them unequal.
hanohanonacowboy 6 days ago
@hanohanonacowboy You devalue the Civil Rights movement every time you make the comparison. It's not the same thing.
juanjoseantoniopedro 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@juanjoseantoniopedro: "You devalue the Civil Rights movement every time you make the comparison."
-- If so, then I am in very good company:
"Marriage is one of the 'basic civil rights of man'" - U.S. Supreme Court, 1967
"The right to marry is not properly viewed simply as a benefit or privilege that a government may establish or abolish as it sees fit, but rather constitutes a basic civil or human right of all people." -- CA Supreme Court, 2008
You are NOT better than your neighbors, juan.
hanohanonacowboy 5 days ago
Comment removed
disposablefreedom 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@juanjoseantoniopedro Oh,but it is.It is exactly the same thing in comparison to treatment.As a psychologist, I have learned to look at this subject from an un bias view point.The only difference is the Civil Rights movement was won..The only difference in treatment is the black community could not hide (inherent color), The Gay community can,(sexuality) to an extent.To hide is to feel shame, to feel shame in being who you are,is the inability to be all you were meant to be.Sound familiar?
disposablefreedom 5 days ago
@hanohanonacowboy So it's about money, and not love?
juanjoseantoniopedro 5 days ago
@juanjoseantoniopedro: "So it's about money, and not love?"
-- People get married for all sorts of reasons. Money and love are two of them. Tradition, parental or religious pressure, and a desire to be "exalted" in a "celestial" arrangement that will make them become gods and rule over alien planets.
But LEGAL marriage--the thing Mitt Romney is speaking about in the viedo--has none of these requirements.
Please quit lying, juan.
hanohanonacowboy 5 days ago
what a coward. He knows that the mormon church considers homosexuality a sin but he doesnt want to look bad in front of the gay community. Fucking coward, lying piece of...
lSomeRandomGuyl 6 days ago
KEEP CHURCH AND STATE SEPERATE!!!
NO Religion in Politics!!!
AngeliqueEU 6 days ago 17
weasel
2wilburc 1 week ago
"I am not a spokesman for the Church." Funny, that isn't what the doctrine of the Mormon church says. I mean every member a missionary and missionaries are representatives of the Mormon church so as a member you are a representative of the Mormon church.
trueinar 1 week ago 2
@trueinar Being a spokesman of the church and a missionary of the church are entirely two different things.
rafaelg45 6 days ago
@rafaelg45 How? I was a Mormon missionary at one point in my life. I was told I represented the church and I was told by the church that I would be expected to answer peoples questions regarding the church. What is the difference between representative of the church and a spokesman? As a missionary I spoke for the church. Missionaries, for any religion speak for their religions and are thus spokesman. Saying that they are two different things doesn't accomplish anything.
trueinar 6 days ago
@trueinar mormonism isn't a religion. It's a scam.
illahham 4 days ago
@illahham touche. That was something I realized as a missionary. My family won't listen but whatever.
trueinar 4 days ago
Mitt Romney on being a douche lol. i crack myself up
TheSoaDShreds 1 week ago
Marriage has been around longer than Christianity. Just sayin.
crobexplosion 1 week ago 18
@crobexplosion Homosexuality too! Just saying.
fabaum22 4 days ago
@fabaum22 Yeah, the Greeks actually agreed that 'feeling' something should be embraced. And a 'marriage' back then was about property and not embarrassing each other, it didn't matter what sex you married. Shouldn't matter today either, it's like they don't affect your lives! And more important issues should be addressed, like global warming and the 3000 homeless children just in Indianapolis. OR the 26,000 that die a day from starvation. Gays getting married shouldn't even be an issue.
crobexplosion 2 days ago
@crobexplosion Not if you believe in Adam and Eve
XCyclonusX 3 days ago
@XCyclonusX Actually that's incorrect. Even so, it doesn't mention anything about marriage in that story. IMO believing that the bible is legitimate history is foolish. I went to a Catholic private high school and a nun told me that the old testament is most definitely a concoction of bed time stories to get the kids to go to sleep and that taking the bible literally isn't what it's all about. People couldn't live to 900 yrs in the Bronze age, and they can't now.
crobexplosion 2 days ago
@XCyclonusX Also, if you are a Christian, you believe that Jesus established the religion, and therefore happened thousands of years after the actual beginning of mankind. So that argument is null.
crobexplosion 2 days ago
@crobexplosion oh my god. that's the reason all creationists need to hear. bravo my friend, bravo
duckcluck123 3 days ago
@duckcluck123 haha, yeah... but they're so close minded (well most of them; I don't wanna stereotype them into something that some of them aren't) and they don't listen to facts. It's kinda sad and it hinders our ability to make progress.
crobexplosion 2 days ago
@crobexplosion Hahaha, of course they don't listen to facts. I was once a 11 years old sort of religious child who 'listened to Darwin', and then I was a 11 years old atheist. If you ignore logic in such a trivial thing, you might as well ignore everywhere else. And isn't Romney a mormon? If so, that's even worse.
fabaum22 20 hours ago
"I oppose same-sex marriage, but I'm making efforts not to discriminate against gays."
yeah, Mitt, that makes sense.
9992103 1 week ago
Look, It's all stupid, who needs a peice of paper saying their married. If you love each other it shouldn't really matter. Also, marriage is a Christian event, its their right to deny gays to get married because it goes against what they believe. What society needs to do is make a new type of marriage called it a "Union" that is like a wedding, but doesn't come froma religious background.
KyleMPulley 1 week ago
@KyleMPulley: "marriage is a Christian event"
-- There are about 2 billion Christians in the world, Kyle. Do you really think none of the other 5 billion ever get married?
Who needs a "stupid piece of paper"? Anyone who must make emergency medical decisions for a sick spouse. A veteran who wants to be buried next to his spouse like all other veterans. A widow who doesn't want to lose her family home just to pay the inheritance that married widows are exempt from. Your ignorance is astounding.
hanohanonacowboy 1 week ago
@hanohanonacowboy I didn't say the other 5 billion don't get married. And all the things you said you "need a piece of paper for" you can do without being married. Its simple, you have one group of people who in a sense "own" a ceremony with beliefs that directly conflict with gays participating in that ceremony. You can't tell jews how to have bar mitzvah's. Same concept applys here. I'm neither Christian, or oppose gay rights. It's just the truth.
KyleMPulley 1 week ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@KyleMPulley : " I didn't say the other 5 billion don't get married."
-- Then you were just flat out wrong when you claimed that "marriage is a Christian event".
-- And no, a Massachusetts veteran couldn't be buried last year next to his husband in a Veteran's cemetery. It violates the Defense of Marriage Act. And no, a California widow is NOT exempt from inheritance tax when her wife dies, like any other widow is, for the same reason.
Try reading a paper before shooting off yer mouth.
hanohanonacowboy 1 week ago
@KyleMPulley: "you have one group of people who in a sense "own" a ceremony "
-- Christians do not "own" marriage in the same way that only Jews have bar mitzvahs. Jews marry. Muslims do, too. So do Hindus and people of no religious faith at all. Nor do all Christians deny marriage to same-sex couples.
You are either too proud or too ignorant to admit you simply don't know what you are talking about.
hanohanonacowboy 1 week ago
@hanohanonacowboy Your making a common mistake, yes Jews marry's but there religion is very similar to straight Christian. But lots of culture do not marry...They have ceremonies that represent the same thing, the joining of 2 people...but its not "marriage" that's just a term people use to summarize the type of ceremony. Marriage is a Christian ceremony. Christians don't believe in same sex partnerships, so it would be considered a disgrace to them and their traditions to have it happen.
KyleMPulley 1 week ago 2
@KyleMPulley Kyle, you are embarrassing yourself with your ignorance. The majority of world cultures marry. ALL countries on earth have laws regulating marriage. Not "ceremonies that represent the same thing". Marriage.
Marriage existed for thousands of years before Christianity existed. Many of the laws in the Old Testament have to do with regulating marriage; they were written at least 1500 years B.C. Jesus himself attended a wedding; the bride and groom were very definitely NOT Christian.
hanohanonacowboy 1 week ago
@KyleMPulley: "Marriage is a Christian ceremony. Christians don't believe in same sex partnerships"
-- My pastor thinks you have no clue what you're talking about, Kyle. So does his husband.
hanohanonacowboy 1 week ago
@hanohanonacowboy Not going to argue with you on bible facts...(ie horse shit) I really don't care what your paster, you, or anyone of faith thinks...because your all delusional
KyleMPulley 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@KyleMPulley: "I'm neither Christian, or oppose gay rights.", "I really don't care what your paster, you, or anyone of faith thinks"
-- And you feel the need to post your expert opinions about marriage being a "Christian" ceremony and about what Christians do and don't believe. Pretty much the definition of talkin out yer ass.
hanohanonacowboy 1 week ago
@KyleMPulley Divorce just slides right on by unnoticed I guess? If tradition and Gods word is so important too these "Christians" then why allow divorce after a marriage? How does it go? "Therefore they are no more two, but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let not man put asunder." I guess it can be changed when it's beneficial to the majority..Hmmmm?
disposablefreedom 5 days ago
@KyleMPulley have you ever heard of the separation of church and state?
christians arnt the only people who are legally allowed to marry
jews, muslims, atheists all legally marry the same way christians do
gays dont want to marry in the biblical sense, they want to be legally married and have the same rights and benefits that hetero married couples have
FarhanC99 4 days ago
one the only things I liked coming out of this guys mouth
EsotericSanity 1 week ago
Human rights should never be put to a vote, especially when it is a minority!
disposablefreedom 1 week ago
Hey, Prop 8 is unconstitutional..Period..The majority can not vote on a minority..To do so is bias and unethical. If this was the case, slavery would have been popular for a lot longer than it was.. :/
disposablefreedom 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Don't worry, if you don't like Mitt's position on gay marriage, Romney will be saying he's for it.
mysterypolice 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RON PAUL - RON PAUL
RON PAUL - RON PAUL
LEGALIZE FREEDOM
OBAMA, MITT, NEWT, FOX, CNN and MSNBC ALL WORK FOR THE GLOBAL BANKS
vote up and repost
NWOsupportersRdbags 1 week ago
Dislike this comment all you want, but I believe that marriage is when a man and a woman comes together in legal and/ or holy unity. To me, if gay people want to get "married", then they should call it something else. That simple. In my opinion, homosexual "marriage" would be like trying to use Football rules in a Basketball games. It just doesn't make sense to me. Oh well. I'm ready for the bombardment of disagreeing comments.
riverbendtwain 1 week ago
faggot's babbling
appleseedxt 1 week ago
all these candidates are such clowns, they just say what is convenient to win election.
roger8654 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Gays can't win. It's like the witch hunt in Old Salem. If they swim, they're witches and will be executed; if they sink, they were innocent, but now they're dead. Oh, well!
Gays are decried for living in promiscuity, but when they want to live in a monogamous marriage to a consenting adult to whom they are mutually attracted to, they are forbidden to marry.
You can't throw stink bombs and then complain about the smell.Anti-gay oppression stinks, and YOU are the cause of it!
Hypocrites!
zerogullibility 1 week ago
He actually doesn't seem that bad in this. Obviously gay marriage should be allowed, but he's taking a fairly mild stance in this video. Wow
lovelybeastification 1 week ago
@lovelybeastification obviously it should in no wise even be considered, much less allowed, you dam fool.
tomcat624u 1 week ago
@tomcat624u why not?
lovelybeastification 1 week ago
@lovelybeastification BECAUSE YOUR A FKN COMPLETE, INCOMPETENT AZZWIPE!!!! THATS WHY.
tomcat624u 1 week ago
@tomcat624u You are a fucking idiot. If you really think we should outlaw gay marriage you're flat out stupid.
lovelybeastification 1 week ago
What a sleaze. "Which response would get me elected? Ill pick that one"
buffalomattarsenal 1 week ago
(Stupid Journalist) All Romney know is that he needs there votes and his tax returns better be what he calculated and his chef is serving meat loaf, mush potatoes, corn, green beans and lemonade. (OK)
SuperPolo990 1 week ago
Typical politician. Always avoids the question.
oxiate 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Using the argument that gay marriage would break the institution's tradition is a worthless one due to the fact that the definition of marriage has changed so many countless times over the centuries that it cannot actually be viewed as a consistent tradition.
Also, even if it was a tradition for a man and woman, that doesnt mean it is correct. With that logic someone could use an argument from tradition in the 60s to maintian racism.
Worthless argument
moroney1 1 week ago
he looks like a President but there's just something about him that is not genuine....anybody else think so?
amici43 1 week ago
@amici43 yeah, the fact that he wants to be president
MilesBennettDysonZ 1 week ago
hypocritical faggot
JaCkMiChEaLs0n 1 week ago
I used to worry about Obama being re-elected, but now I think it's a very high probability since the two republican candidates are so extreme. Any sane person would still vote for Obama over crazy Romney and weirdo Santorum. God it's a freak show this year.
ShihTzusShit 1 week ago
@ShihTzusShit RON PAUL IS THE ONLY CLEAR CHOICE, YOU DAYUM FOOL!!!!
tomcat624u 1 week ago
The only possible reason to oppose gay marriage is one of religious contention. So it's completely disingenuous to talk about 'separating personal faith from matters of leadership'.
ZelenoffFanClub 1 week ago
What's really pathetic is that Romney says he wants to use a Constitutional amendment to remove the right to marry from citizens of his own state--the state where was governor for 4 years. He wants to pass a law to take Massachusetts couples who've been married for 7 years now and have them forcibly divorced against their will.
If this is the way this shameless hypocrite stands up for the citizens of his own state, how could anyone ever expect him to stand up for all Americans?
hanohanonacowboy 1 week ago
@hanohanonacowboy Not forcibly divorced, the "marriages" are just void.
juanjoseantoniopedro 1 week ago
@Renagade1325 - yes, I travel all over the world for work ... parts of America are just as religiously fanatical as the most Muslim countries I have been to ... it is just another dogma that those parts of America are into ...
jmu11a 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
US ECONOMY COLLAPSED COS EUROPE CREATED EUROS. EUROS CREATED EUROS COS REPUBLICANS WERE FOCUSING ON LEWINSKI DRESS. POPULATION OF CHINA IS 1.4B, CHINA MADE THE WHOLE WORLD UNEMPLOYED. PALESTINE MUST MOVE TO HONG KONG. HONG KONG PEOPLE MUST MOVE TO MAIN LAND BY 2015. CHINA HAD A GOOD AGRICULTURE AND THEY BREED BOYS , THEY SEND GIRLS TO BE WHORES IN USA, UK, CANADA, AUSTRALIA, ETC. CHINA IS # 1 IN HUMAN TRAFFICKING. POPULATION OF USA IS ONLY 310 MLN,POPULATION OF CHINA IS 1.4B READ MY CHANNEL PLZ
democratsaresmart 1 week ago
Good for Him! He doesn't have to be a use his religion to defend his political stand points. Score one for Romney.
YouHaveWonAFreeiPad 1 week ago 2
1:17 At least he concludes with this. I don't agree with him but at least this shows some integrity.
Beschaulichkeit 1 week ago
Obama 2012 cause hes not a bigot
007wrestlingking 1 week ago
@007wrestlingking FK U 2
tomcat624u 1 week ago
FUCK him honestly this pisses me off so much, damn i wish i was old enough to vote.
46JacobyGirl 1 week ago
You got to be an ASSHOLE to vote for this IRRATIONAL LUNATIC.
America is DOOMED.
ray180597 1 week ago
We need to turn a corner in this country and get over this aversion to gay people. Romney & Santorum are religious kooks who work backwards from their ancient bibles. These are dangerous men.
Sweence 1 week ago 8
@Sweence Id' rather have men that hold morals and actually attempt to serve a righteous god with fear and respect rather than a atheist leader who is lawless and doesn't believe in a god at all. By the way, if anyone is dangerous, it is surely Obama with all his corruption, scandals and socialist agenda that is putting America in debt for decades to come.
cobra3385 1 week ago
@cobra3385 Atheists are "Lawless"? Atheists have been the greatest contributors to scientific advancements and are the most philanthropic. Look at Warren Buffet, Bill Gates & George Clooney who donate billions to African charities with NO religious agenda. Also, an Atheist will NEVER fly a plane into a building or bomb an abortion clinic. Please take your head out of your ass.
Sweence 1 week ago
@Sweence Don't forget Albert Einstein, Andrew Carnegie(also a philantropist), Pavlov, Sigmund Freud, Warren Buffet, Carl Sagan, George Carlin, Jesse Ventura, Steven Hawking, and Mark Zuckerberg(Facebook lol).
pittsburghsports16 1 week ago
@Sweence Funny how they donate to Africa but yet won't donate a damn dime to the hard working middle class in America who actually deserve a real donation. Those men you mentioned are classic socialists thinkers who want too redistribute our wealth to foreign people that don't even deserve it, as ALL of them are Obama contributors. It's easy for them to get on camera and appear righteous with their phony donations but when the cameras off, see if you'll get a damn dime little American
cobra3385 1 week ago
@cobra3385 You're shifting the subject but allow me to straighten you out anyway. None of these men are socialist thinkers. Just good charitable human beings who earned their money because of capitalism. The situation in Darfur is more dire than anything in this country where lazy, spoiled shitheads play with their gadgets and pray to an imaginary man rather than getting off their asses and innovating.
Sweence 1 week ago
@cobra3385 "Funny how they donate to Africa but yet won't donate a damn dime to the hard working middle class in America who actually deserve a real donation"
You know what's not funny at all, how you believe starving children don't deserve aid from the wealthy. You are what's wrong with this world. That is the complete opposite of what REAL Christians believe. If you're going to talk the talk, man up and walk the walk you coward. You are a disgrace to the Christian faith. You worship your flag
Stefandurrr 1 week ago 10
@Stefandurrr Putting a gun to people's heads and forcing them to cough up cash for your beliefs is not Christian either. Nor an act of freedom. It's tyranny. And there is no such thing as 'just tyranny'.
dbsommers1 1 week ago
@dbsommers1 What? When did I say anything about supporting robbery?
Stefandurrr 1 week ago
@Stefandurrr So now your a Christian all the sudden? Make up your mind. Well first of all I'm not Christian, I am a Jew. And second of all, your twisting my words to make it seem like it's a crime to donate to the poor as you completely missed the point. Religious institutions have done more for the poor than any self-serving athiest that puts on a act (most of them) for their charities. Just look at Bill Clinton and his Haitian fund as the haitians over there never saw the money.
cobra3385 1 week ago
@cobra3385 Look at what atheism has done to China and Russia and other countries. Atheist ran countries are always violating human rights with their abortions, redistribution of people's hard earned wealth to people that don't work (which is stealing) and robbing peopleof their freedoms and god-given liberties
cobra3385 1 week ago
@cobra3385 You're saying that Atheism caused China & Russia's problems? Are you kidding? Atheism isn't a religion any more than abstinence is a sexual position. Maniacal dictators who are also non-religious never killed anyone in the name of Atheism. They also happen to have mustaches but you wouldn't say that people with mustaches are prone to killing. It's an erroneous association commonly made by religious idiots.
Sweence 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@cobra3385 You're saying that Atheism caused China & Russia's problems? Are you kidding? Atheism isn't a religion any more than abstinence is a sexual position. Maniacal dictators who are also non-religious never killed anyone in the name of Atheism. They also happen to have mustaches but you wouldn't say that people with mustaches are prone to killing. It's an erroneous association commonly made by religious idiots.
Sweence 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@cobra3385 You're saying that Atheism caused China & Russia's problems? Are you kidding? Atheism isn't a religion any more than abstinence is a sexual position. Maniacal dictators who are also non-religious never killed anyone in the name of Atheism. They also happen to have mustaches but you wouldn't say that people with mustaches are prone to killing. It's an erroneous association commonly made by religious idiots.
Sweence 1 week ago
@Sweence be\cause they think different from you.... he's allowed to believe what he believes
TheSteeletube 1 week ago
@TheSteeletube Huh? Please try and form a coherent response so that I may retort properly.
Sweence 1 week ago
He is such a shithead. anyone who morally controls you or me has no right to LIVE much less lead us. Stick to issues, not morals. fuck your stupid-ass religion.... almost nobody believes ANY of that shit anymore. Santa Claus and Jesus... same damn thing.
BoudicaSlade 1 week ago
@BoudicaSlade People thought the same thing about Kennedy. But the Vatican wasn't pulling the strings behind his presidency.
juanjoseantoniopedro 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Mitt Romney needs to rely on his magic underwear, and leave the Presidency to someone who doesn't let thier religious views overshadow thier decisions for the majority, given the fact that me, and many, many, others like me don't have magic underwear to protect us..
disposablefreedom 1 week ago
@disposablefreedom YOU need to learn the difference between there, their, and they're.
juanjoseantoniopedro 1 week ago
@juanjoseantoniopedro THey're=They are, Their shows ownership, and there is a reference to place or position.. If I have made mistakes, and probably have with these terms, what can I say? I am only human, and I don't have time to be precise.. Maybe you should pay attention to punctuation in the future, just as I need to pay attention to propper termanology.. Just saying.. O_o
disposablefreedom 1 week ago
@juanjoseantoniopedro Last time I checked, we weren't in a spelling bee, or an English class..Youtube has become one huge debate.. Ethics, is where it pays off in the long run..
disposablefreedom 1 week ago
Mitt handled that well. Im not for him. Im for Dr. Paul. But I think he handled that better than that rat fuck Santorium would have.
EricLynchSucks 1 week ago
Is anyone still under the impression that the Republicans don't hate gay people? Is anyone still buying the cover story of "protecting the sanctity of marriage" or whatever elitist, racist, Christianist, homophobic propaganda they're spewing forth like sheer, concentrated stupid?
TheIlluminaughty1 1 week ago
Mitt Romney is like the govenor from south park.
"You will be called... BUTT BUDDIES"
"Instead of man and woman you will be Buutt Buuuudies."
Evolutionofhell 1 week ago
RON PAUL 2012!!!!!!
tomcat624u 1 week ago 28
@tomcat624u fuck you
puckle3 1 week ago
@puckle3 YO MAMMY DID!!!!!!
tomcat624u 1 week ago
@tomcat624u oh wait i thought you said romney :O <3
puckle3 1 week ago
@tomcat624u Obama 2012.
AScearce2332 1 week ago
@AScearce2332 NO WAY , PUNK!!!!!
tomcat624u 1 week ago
@JakobiaP If you truly are willing to look at Christianity with an open mind if provided with evidence, I encourage you to read "The Case for Christ." It's a book written about the experience of an atheistic journalist from Chicago that literally searched for evidence that there was (or wasn't) a God for 2 years. He came to a pretty interesting conclusion.
P.S. "Metal Illness" lol.
tgurau 2 weeks ago
@MoonShoesPotter07 You shouldn't base Christians on people like this moron. To me, it sounds more like a troll that's trying to make Christians look stupid. While I don't agree with gay marriage, I don't believe marriage should be a part of government. Marriage started in religion and grew from there so it should stay there. Gay people should have the same legal rights as a married couple, but shouldn't get married.
I tend to not make sense sometimes, understand what I'm trying to say?
tgurau 2 weeks ago
@tgurau
Actually, marriage existed long before Christianity. Just to let you know. :) Marriage is a legal contract more than anything, and if two consenting adults want to enter into that contract, by all means. Let them.
DrewLandcaster 2 weeks ago
@DrewLandcaster JESUS GAVE MARRIAGE TO A MAN A WOMAN, YOU DAYUM INCOMPETENT , FOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL!!!!!!!
tomcat624u 1 week ago 4
@DrewLandcaster Actually, The Bible begins at the creation of man, so the only thing before Chrstianity is God. Besides, people get married in church, seperate it from the state; that's all I'm saying.
tgurau 6 days ago