Aww motherfuckin' haters, you guys hate cause you guys too dumb to do this kind of stuff, you guys don't know how move things with your mind, you guys think telekinesis is childish but it's not, whiter you're young or old, boy or girl, you can do this as long as you develop energy from your brain.
hoy 2012 ya les comento salio el programa el sabado 24 de dic 2011 en canl 4 con Andres Oppenheimer y URIGeller puse cuchara sobre la tv, sali, desafortunadamente me apagaron la tv la prendi, quedaron 3 minutos de programa y el unico efecto que hubo, FUE LA VARIACION DE VOLTAJE CON DURACION DE 10 MINUTOS despues de acabar programa.
ya que la pantalla se modificaba como si le faltara luz o su correspondiente voltaje, en Mx
there was a time when i am stressed out... i walked to the library and while passing through the books fell... until now that thing bugs me... same also with my mother.. when we are in the grocery... products fell after we passed.. then one time we had a disagreement and we are both emotionally escalated... the refrigerator... the cabinet... and the door opened by itself there was no air since we are in a studio type apartment
@cchhaarrlliiie It doesn't matter... First of all how did you find this if you didn't know specifically of the U.S.S.R.'s tests and experiments on those with psychic abilities, and if you did then you should realize all though there is a chance this video is fake, the experiments were formed and have an extent of truth.
@ErieTheUnDead It is not clear though whether these were conducted as bona fide experiments, or theatrical film productions from the outset. These look very much staged and artificial. This was the Cold War, and the U.S.S.R. had a huge interest in intimidating the U.S. by intentionally "leaking" such footage. It is an uncontested fact that they succeeded in it, too.
Clearly james randi this old magician couldn't do everythink wath kulagina did.No Magician could do the presentation of kulagina with the tennis ball in the little plexi glas box not even one of the best magician in germany simon pierro they showed a big doku about kulagina and he wasn't able to do it.
Ugh. Clearly threads and magnets account for all of this fraud's tricks. Scientists are very easy to fool - especially when they are LOOKING for positive results. Any magician would have made short work of her in minutes, In fact, James Randi did.
The objects shown first were moved by a magnet under the table. All the objects were metal, except for the matchbox, which could have something inside it.
The matches and stuff on the glass table were moved using static electricity. You can easily move charged plastic tubes around a table with your hand, try it.
The heart beat video is fake, it's obviously not old (just greyscale) and set up and it's not the same person doing it, i.e an actress.
@trilex1234 Okay, make a video of you doing it on solid concrete ground, not a table. Do not cover your mouth so you can't blow on it and use something that can't be moved using static electricity. If you do that you'll be the first and maybe I'll believe you.
I have read and heard from various sources there is a price for this power if you can get to this level of skill ie heart problems,high blood presure,pains in the spine ,limbs and dizziness
@xCharizardXo Oh wait I am sorry I thought you were talking about the woman in the reenactments. I spoke too soon, before finishing the video. My apologies.
Women who are experts at tantric sex can control their ovulation. There are men who can withstand lethal doses of electricity and charge their bodies like batteries to amounts that would kill a normal human, or melt skin. For this reason, I think there is room in science for people controlling their electro-magnetic output to an extent. I do however believe their needs to be more evidence. Soviet results are not 100% trustworthy, the same way that UFO sightings in the US at that time are not.
@theufohunter123 There is no cited evidence anywhere for use of only 4% or 10%. Not to say we are always wired to use all of our brain potential at a time, of course you can always learn more, or learn to think in different ways, but to put round figures on the%we use is urban fabrication. As far as I can tell anyway, I'd be interested to find any contradictory evidence though. I just googled it for 30 mins, I dont claim to know much... I just dont believe in using the 10% argument for psi-power
@zonex1a Who ever said that she was using "the raw power of her mind"? The entire POINT of studying psychokinetic phenomenon is to determine what causes it. "Raw mind power" is only one possible explanation. Considering the results of studies such as these, it's becoming more and more likely that the acts of using telekinesis have less to do with the mind than is the public interpretation, and much more to do with the muscles and blood flow in the body.
In quantum physics they realised that one's consciousness actually influences matter at an absysmal level.That's why scientists have to step out of the rooms where they do their experiments to get valid data.
If u didn'T know, we only use 4% of our brain. So what does the 96% consist of?
Some say we have forgotten knowledge and that our brains are much more powerful then what we may think.
Although I am a skeptic by nature, I do believe this to be possible
@figthersdreams Quantum physics isn't a complete science, some say that the problem of quantum physics lies in its formalism, others say that we can't understand the subatomic particles because our mind chages everything (as you were saying), and other point of view says that there are some elements of the subatomic universe, that we haven't discover yet, and that make us think that is our mind who changes the results... any way, we can't explain paranormal activities with this sience.
@figthersdreams And about our brain, the true is that we us only 4% at same time, for making actions, thinking and stuff. But we use a big part of our brain, I dare to say that we us more than 50%... but we don't use that 50% at the same time. Anyway, that'd be amazing if we could use all the 50% at the same time...
@Alican17b Why would you not seeing the signs of trickery mean they aren't there? You just repeated what I was saying. I said you may not know what to look for. Of course if you don't see what is there you can't say it is. Just as in if I see the signs of what is there but is not obvious to others. I or anyone else that knows what to look for and catches it can tell you it is indeed there.
Here is an actual critic case. Park maintains that if a coin is flipped enough times, even a slight imperfection can produce more than 50% heads, and that the "tiny statistical edges" PEAR reported are the result of statistical flaws. Bullshit, no matter how many times you flip or spin the coin, the probability of 1/2 or 0.5 or 50% will always remain the same. If it lands on heads more often, then that is due to luck.
@angelsssssssssssss That is not the same or even close to the experiments that we are discussing. Probability and and chance have nothing to do with a psychic test. In this case. when testing if things can be moved with the mind there is nothing left to chance. In correctly done test all the T's and Q's have been crossed. There is no margin no it's are left open. All chances of trickery are taken away in correctly done test. so results can and will be conclusive. With out any doubt.
@RS1963, Yes, testing macro-PK (Which is moving or levitating physical objects by the mind) has nothing to do with chance, but what I am talking about is micro-PK (Which is influencing random events and subatomic particles by the power of the mind). Micro-PK experiments requires statistical analysis to see if the results are statistically significant or not. Yes, experiments needs to eliminate bias such as information bias, but you cannot 100% eliminate them.
@RS1963,The control group may have been placed further into the shade than the experimental group, and so on. This is why any one experiment is only used to provide support for a hypothesis, rather than proof. So, according to my subjective opinion, if James Randi's test has been won, hence I would strongly disagree that is proof of psychic powers.
@angelsssssssssssss I understand where you are coming from but to say science can or can't prove anything is real or not real is just incorrect . The facts remain science has proven or dis proven many things. As for Randi's tests. They would be done by scientists but with Randi guiding them in how to protect from fraud etc. Yes if someone did indeed pass the tests at some point. more test would have to be done. Much tougher ones too in order for conclusive facts to be arrived at.
@RS1963, I didn't say that Science can or can't prove anything is real or not real. I was saying that there is no such thing as proof in Science. Again, scientist gather their information by their own experiments, then once they have support their hypothesis many times, they publish their results. Scientist only support a hypothesis not proof of a hypothesis. You cannot prove a negative. It's simple logic.
@RS1963, Yeah, people who has passed James Randi's test need to replicate their results. If they could replicate their results, then this can give us evidence that psychic phenomena is possible, but that wouldn't be proof of psychic phenomena.
@angelsssssssssssss Exactly. One round of very controlled testing is not going to be conclusive proof. Now if any psychic powers are ever proven, It still does not mean that all things claimed that can be done can be. It could be proven that actual mind reading exists. But not PK. or vise a versa One proven area will not even begin to prove all other areas. Of course there will those that say it would.
@RS1963, Yes, but if Psychic powers has been proven, then there's still a strong possibility that one or more factors were responsible for the result, even if there was a control group. You're right, if one area of psychic phenomena have been shown to exist, then the area of another psychic phenomena has not. There is this sign that says, "Beware of researchers who try to attempt to prove a hypothesis in experiments."
Did you have any proof for thath i mean you wasn't in the Video or is thath false by Uri geller we have seen a Magnet in his Hand so we can say he is a charlatan but by kulagina we didn't see anythink so we can say nothink only over all mind and i believe thath She has this powers
@Alican17b Does a crime expert have to been in a video tape of a robbery to prove that it was done? No. Does a coroner have to be the dead person to determine a cause of death? No. so Does someone that investigates so called psychics have to be involved in a video to know if one is fake or not? Of course not. Your reasoning is very flawed.
@Alican17b Also just because you didn't see that fact that she was using magnets or threads show that you fully understand what to look for. Things can be hidden in the open in some circumstances, and if you don't know what or where to look you will not see it.
When you research you will find some articles where stand that is not true She don't have this Powers but the most of this articles where written from the American Side and in the Cold war it is so you don't can belive thath articles because you don't no it is true or false Nobody no thath i think only her husband or her childrens no thath
@Alican17b Being a magician I know exactly what to look for. I know exactly how she did everything in the videos. It's not hard to discover the how of what she did anyway. Yes everything she did was done by nothing more than magic effects. She was exposed as a fraud while she was doing all these things as well.
Oh really they didnt use anythink of thath for propganda that are the truh Pictures of russian scientests Yes you can contact then they didnt Tell you anythink because they are not allowed to do this .
@SleeplessNinja That is not true. It had been proven over and over again that there is no truth to anything in the video. In fact if you were to contact the Russian government they would tell you this was all made up. Even though at that time they were using it for propaganda.
@RS1963 Are you facts based on your own observations or do you have an article bout this I should read? This film is bizzarre but I just refuse to believe someone has the ability to control objects like that makes, simply makes no sense
@ef6854 There are all kind of reports, articles etc.. That talk about how Nina and others faked all this. Yes I have studied this as well and have found so far no one that can really do these things. I have an open mind about it but so far there has been no proof of this being real. There has never been any conclusive evidence that these things can really be done. I don't have any links at moment but the information is very easy to find.
@RS1963, You are never gonna see proof of psychic phenomena in the scientific community because Science doesn't prove anything. In fact, many scientist believe that it is impossible to prove anything at all. Scientist only gather scientific information from experiments that follow the Scientific Method. Usually, the scientific information comes from the hypothesis of a experiment. So, what's the point of saying "prove it", since you can't prove anything at all?
@angelsssssssssssss That's not quite true. Science has proven many things. Iook at the vaccine for polio. Is medicine not part of science too? Of course it is. The fact that scientists do at times test psychic claims shows that they can indeed prove if it does exist or if it does not. So far scientists have found do proof of such claims. Bt.w. the science experiments are done to see if whatever it is will work or fail. That provides the proof one way or the other.
@RS1963, Ok, since there is proof in Science, then why is it that there are still rumors that there is no such thing as proof in Science? Well, there are actual scientific experiments of psychokinesis, but the experiment does not involve in people who claim to move objects using the power of the mind. The experiment is used to see if people can influence random events such as the fall of the die using the power of the mind. This is called micro-PK. (Continue)
@RS1963, According to the experiment, the results are shown to be statistically significant and the result can be replicated. In a experiment, it is required to use this scientific instrument called, "Statistical Analysis" to see if there is evidence that supports the hypothesis or to see if there is evidence against the hypothesis which is the null-hypothesis. This experiments has also been shown to eliminate bias where it shows the subject cheating, random errors and wrong measurements.
@RS1963, Critics say that this type of experiments are bias because there is more than 50% of chance of a coin landing in H or T and the die landing on 6 more often because of the weight. As a study in statistics and probabilities, this is total horseshit. All the sides of a die have an equal probability of landing on the upper face. Probabilities of all sides cannot change and that's a fact in probability. Same thing goes to the coin.
@RS1963, Again, there is no such thing as proof in Science. Scientist only focus on their hypothesis and try to support their hypothesis by running experiments that follow the Scientific Method. In a experiment, The supporting evidence of a hypothesis is evidence of the possibility of whatever the hypothesis is, but the evidence of a hypothesis itself, is not proof of the hypothesis. In the basis of an experiment, there is no such thing as proof.
@RS1963, Let me make this point more vivid. If the results from the sunflower experiment were taken that the hypothesis was proven 100%, then there would still be a strong possibility that one or more factors were responsible for the result even if there was a control group, For instance, the concentration of the phosphate may have actually been 110mg/L due to lab error, there may have been excess ferilizer landing by chance only on the experimental gropu, but not the control group. (Continue)
RS 1963 Yes but when you look one time she moved only the compass needle and in other time she moved the compass and the needle is not moving and how could you explain one time in a other video you will find it she moved the compass and the compass needle is moving too they both
@Alican17b Same way as I said magnets. If you knew how magicians used them to move compass needles and other objects you would understand how she in fact used magnets perfectly.
RS1963. Yes but When you are looking carefully then you will see that she move not the compass needle she moved the compass and i dont can think that she can move this big compass in such a form because she have too make very scary moves with her body
@Alican17b Actually that is even more clue as to the how of the compass moving. The movements of her body are to misdirecting the movement of the part of her body where the magnet actually is. No it's not on her chest. Watch it closely and you should catch on to where it is. Remember not just the needle of the compass is affected by the magnet. The outer body of the compass is metal. That is why the whole compass moves as well.
@RS1963 a match stick is way too thin for a metal straight pin to go in without splitting it and what i wanna know is y ppl are soo close minded to these things. Our military today is studying up on ppl like this for their reasons.
@mralan9010 Nice try but no they are not. magicians do it all the time. Yes I am a magician. Next time you buy a dress shirt and take out the pins that keep it folded in place. look at the pins. You will see they are not too big. That is a fact. The military is not studying so called psychics. That's what the believers in such things and the frauds would like you to to think Do some research and found out.
@RS1963 Actually sir there are records that were declassified by the CIA involving psychic ability's. Do your research before trying to debunk this as fake. These cases date back to the early 1900's.
@SleeplessNinja Actually those so called documents never were real. They were made to look real and over the years have been re printed in tabloid newspapers such as The National Enquirer etc... So maybe you should do more research?
@Alican17b The magnets of course were not held in her hands. She had then taped or bandaged at her knees (for moving things on the table) On her chest for the movement of the compass. They can be attached anywhere. Go ask a magician.
Nina Kulagina kann die Objekte wegen ihrem starken elektromagnetischen Feld bewegen das bei normaler körperlicher Ruhe 4 bis 6 mal stärker ist als das bei einem normalen Menschen bei ihren psychokinetischen Vorführungen verbraucht ihr körper extrem viel Energie .
Um, you could actually see objects moving and levitating on its own by Electromagnetic fields(EMF). Arrcording to many physicist, these EMFs causing objects to move and levitate is quite feasible. In Youtube, look up, John Hutchinson, Hutchinson Effect. You will see objects behaving very strangly. They behave quite similar to poltergeist and psychokinetic activity.
You concentrate on something so hard that your desires get integrated into your sense of reality. In this state of madness, you have learned telekenesis. Unfortunately, you cannot prove this to anyone else.
If it is factual, why would belief be required? No one has ever proved such abilities. Ever.
There is a million dollars waiting for the first person to do so. What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof.
there is no absolute truths, and yes belief makes things true, even in science certain assumptions without the possibility of scientific evidence were made for certain accepted theories to hold up like for example einstein's special theory of relativity which hinges to the theoretical assumption that light travels at a constant speed point A to point B. If we ever have to make a definite stand on any ideas or phenomenon , we always have to jump into 'a leap of faith' in order to do that.
Well dunno much about details on how the cold war communist scientists conducted their tests on Nina and the others but they certainly bought it and set about planning the diabolical scheme to telepathically assasinate western leaders using telekinesis,and they were serious about this. They pioneered advanced studies of parapsychology to serve their own political ends. Thats why even today psychical research and development are very much advanced in such countries such as Poland and Bulgaria.
Yes people can believe whatever they want. Does belief make it true? No. Don't you think that if it were true most if not all scientists in the world would believe it? Or even care about it? That is a key telling point right there. The ones that have said they think it's real again they have had flawed tests. That is the truth.
Yes there somethings that can't be explained away just as a trick. We have all had things happen that very well maybe more than coincidence. Do they happen all the time? No. Are all such things more than a coincidence? Again no. Is there really a way to tell what in those cases is or isn't a coincidence? More than likely there isn't a for sure way to tell.
You should research more on parapsychology as a whole. I recommend the works of Jaime Licauco specifically his his book "Understanding the Psychic Powers of Man" He is not a psychic himself, but actually a skeptic at first, but his scholarly investigation into parapsychology led him into what he is now as founder of the Inner Mind Development Institute.
Even the great Dr. Carl Jung was fascinated by parapsychology, I bet you know his story about the scarab beetle. But then again...
"Do I know everything about it no. Is it possible to know everything about it? No."
You're spot on about that because there is a universe of things yet to be understood and discovered by science about the human mind, Its not all about telekinesis and mind reading that is somehow connected to your profession but a whole range of phenomena under parapsychology such as OOBE, Hightened Intuition, Premonition, Astral Projection etc. that were all thoroughly scientificallly investigated.
Sadly to say there are magicians who are not honest about what they do, that they ingloriously using the psychic phenomenon to dramatize their magic tricks. Yes, I'm not a magician, but I enjoy magic shows, i happen to be friends with quite a number of street magicians and they have no psychic pretenses, just plain old sleight of hand and I like that and I hope you are in that category too.
I don't do any mental magic but their are some very good ones out there that do and don't claim to be real. Trust me the ones that claim to be real are fake. such as Uri Geller, Sylvia Browne, John Edwards, Ask your magician friends more about these types of things. Unless they probably will say what I have. Check out magicians that do mental magic such as Banacheck. Richard Osterlind, Luke Jermay. None of them claim to be real. But some do believe they are real as well.
I'm not closed minded to something being real psychic wise. But up to this point in time have not found or seen anything that could or should be taken as being real. I don't think you feel this way but to a good many skeptics are those that don't believe in anything and can never be swayed in the other direction. That is so far from the truth. Skeptics are very open. It's just that they demand that very strict test be given to those claiming such powers. So far most testing is not very strict
And to say that these wonderfully gifted individuals withstood these scientific testing over a great period of time and with the advancing technology is a testament of the boundless capacity of the human mind that still baffle scientists up to this day. You magicians are just showmen, this is the real thing.
Well okay, based on your earlier posts, it seems that you are a mr. know-it-all type of a guy so I am quite surprised you aren't familiar with the famous Dr. Richard Dawkins. Psychokinesis and psychic abilities in humans are subjects of serious scientific investigations for decades especially in the former iron curtain countries. Psychics and telekinetics are subjected to the mot rigorous scientific testing and scrutiny that mere conjurer like you could have easily been spotted.
If you were to really look into how scientists test so called psychics you would be in shock to see how easy it is to fool them. Check into project Alpha. Even tho this wasn't in a lab look at the vid of Uri Geller's failed spot on the Tonight show. Everything was protected the way that scientists should protect things but don't. Geller claimed it was do to Carson being a skeptic. That had nothing to do with it. belief or not would not matter if he had been real he would not have failed.
I don't "Know it all" nor do I claim too. Yes there are a very very few subjects I know very well such as this one. That knowledge didn't come over night nor over a short period of time either. More like 37 plus years. Do I know everything about it no. Is it possible to know everything about it? No.
RS1963's reference to fairies and unicorns gave him away as a Dawkins fan. No amount of physical evidence about telekinesis or about anything that contradicts their warped beliefs could ever change their atheist belief based on the scientific method.
Sorry but I have no idea who Dawkins is. That is a fact. I have never heard of him nor do I. B.T.W I'm not an atheist. I do believe in god and always will. So how's that for blowing your theory out of the water? The facts are I know what to look for I have studied these things for years. I do know for a fact when someone is doing something by trick means. How? I'm a magician. You and others on here obviously are not.
Also Scientists have no clue how to test or protect the test items from being tampered with when testing psychic claims. That is a fact. If you do the research you will see why and how it is fact. Again I don't know who Dawkins is. I don't know what he does nor do I want to For all I know he could be a game show host.
Friend, respect your opinion. But I advise you to study about Taoist meditation (chikung) and Hindu meditation - you'll learn that can influence the matter with the mind. Contrary to what you think, there is another reality which you and most known and had been forgotten by the time stifled by technology and the attachment to the physical world. Study and practice my friend.
There is nothing wrong with meditation that's for sure. But no where has it been shown that anything that is shown done but Nina or others can be done from meditation. Again any "tests" that have agreed with the claims, have been flawed tests. The conditions set have been very non secured and open to all kinds of tampering. That is something you learn if you research and really study these things.
i can do telekinesis but not all the time joining hands in a circle is how it can be done s for the women on the glass looking table its static electricity from a plexiglass all can do this
The only minds that are being controlled are the ones that believe in these things. It's fine to enjoy these things for what they are magic tricks. But to try and proclaim that this is done by the mind is ridiculous. We no longer live in the 1600's when warlocks were believed in we matured and learned there are no monsters under the bed. At least those of sound mind did. Dragons do not exist, Nor do Fairies, Unicorns, etc.. People can not move things with their mind it's a trick.
Your going to believe everything said that is in a video that was produced by a Communist country during the cold war? There is not much in the video that is factual.
yeah, like US didnt lie on anything during the cold war... this isnt the only video, and rusians cientists werent the only ones that saw her perform, do some research. im esceptical too but facts ARE facts. btw what has comunism to do with this?? hehe stupid
Of course we did the same things. If you have to ask what that has to do with anything you wouldn't understand anyway. I see this conversation is finished before it even started.
If you want to call a video that is full of false claims and made up "facts" Facts you can but that doesn't mean any of what was said or shown is true. B.t.w. the facts are none of it is true. You need to do the research.
well i dont know how you know those are "false claims" but since you werent there ill just asume you say that becouse you believe that, well i believe otherwise. since you blame comunism and bring political stuff into this i can tell youre not an open minded kinda guy. so yeah youre rigth this conversation is finished, cant talk with a brain on a can. sorry
By researching such things and other ways as well. You have heard of research haven't you? Or are you like all of about two other people in this thread that have no idea what research is or how to do it?
man muss sich nina kulagina nur mal am anfang anschauen sie sitzt auf so einem hocker und in so einem glaskäfig
da ist so ein gegenstand der sich von ihr
wegbewegt sie muss ihre hände nicht einmahl benutzen.Und zu Alla Vinogradowa sage ich sie kann die gegenstände nur mit hilfer der elektrostatichen aufladung der platte bewegen warum bewegt sie den die gegenstände nicht wie kulagina also zu sich und nicht andauernd hin und her rollen wegen dem geringeren wiederstandt
we were all born with this ability. We temporaroly forget iwhen we are taught that there are alleged boundrys on everything in life. This part of our m inds in my opinion is usually destroyed around the time of 3-7 years old. and can be redeveloped
The only time any part of a person's brain is destroyed is if a person has a stroke, or suffers a severe head injury, or oxygen has been cut off from the brain for an extended period. The saying that humans only use ten percent of their brain is false. All humans use 100 percent of the brain unless they have had an injury to the brain.
something's wrong... I dont think that URSS would have spared the life of anyone... I believe Nina Kulagina's case but i dont think it is exactly like that
She may have had one of the magnets hidden on her chest. One place she did for a fact have one hidden was on one of her knees. She may have had one on an ankle at one time as well. Before anyone asked how it was held there. By a bandage or any other means it could be attached to the body and then easily removed later on.
The human mind is more powerful than you think. The Pineal Gland is the key, and the elites know this, which is why they try to block it's power by all the negativity and fluoride in the world. FREE YOUR MIND!!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Nina Kulagina, has been witnessed by Western Parapsychologist, but has never been extensively tested under rigorous laboratory conditions in the West, and her feats have not been scruntinized by professional magican.
Again scientists have no clue as to how to test a proclaimed psychic. She had been investigated by magicians when she was still alive as well as all her videos have been viewed by magicians well versed in the ways of fake psychics after her death. Just because she's dead doesn't mean that her videos can't well examined to determine if trickery was used or not. One doesn't have to be living to be be proven a real or fake psychic.
It's obviously a reenactment. The quality of the video is far too clear and the actors are not exactly professionals. Did you seriously think that both videos were from the 60s?
magnets? that what it looks like. i'm not really a skeptic but i find these hard to believe.
colin9413c 3 days ago
Funny, there are 2 different women in this video. One moving objects, ANOTHER affecting frog.
yesamazing0 1 week ago
Aww motherfuckin' haters, you guys hate cause you guys too dumb to do this kind of stuff, you guys don't know how move things with your mind, you guys think telekinesis is childish but it's not, whiter you're young or old, boy or girl, you can do this as long as you develop energy from your brain.
Theflip009 1 week ago
load of shit
MrJackizilla 2 weeks ago
hoy 2012 ya les comento salio el programa el sabado 24 de dic 2011 en canl 4 con Andres Oppenheimer y URIGeller puse cuchara sobre la tv, sali, desafortunadamente me apagaron la tv la prendi, quedaron 3 minutos de programa y el unico efecto que hubo, FUE LA VARIACION DE VOLTAJE CON DURACION DE 10 MINUTOS despues de acabar programa.
ya que la pantalla se modificaba como si le faltara luz o su correspondiente voltaje, en Mx
ergunacion 1 month ago
+1 By me because i believe that human brain has a lot of secrets to discover
Psych0Noob 1 month ago
0:24 is poutin
xilais 1 month ago
Why every 1 has make up?? omg... fake videos like this has to stop...
gabrgr 1 month ago 2
there was a time when i am stressed out... i walked to the library and while passing through the books fell... until now that thing bugs me... same also with my mother.. when we are in the grocery... products fell after we passed.. then one time we had a disagreement and we are both emotionally escalated... the refrigerator... the cabinet... and the door opened by itself there was no air since we are in a studio type apartment
Robotcobray 1 month ago
Is that Roger Moore voice over?
sisterbrothers 1 month ago
member yan ng RED ARMY
pamfu00000 2 months ago
anyone else find this name from the movie frighteners?
AblonPahdellaJaherst 3 months ago 3
watch?v=pYGjtlgGtY4
cchhaarrlliiie 3 months ago
This is a joke....
(yes....im a magician, and these are all tricks that a 10 year old could do)
cchhaarrlliiie 5 months ago
@cchhaarrlliiie It doesn't matter... First of all how did you find this if you didn't know specifically of the U.S.S.R.'s tests and experiments on those with psychic abilities, and if you did then you should realize all though there is a chance this video is fake, the experiments were formed and have an extent of truth.
ErieTheUnDead 4 months ago
@ErieTheUnDead I knew about the tests from reading, and the reason she stopped, is because the scientists doing the experiment caught her....
cchhaarrlliiie 4 months ago
@ErieTheUnDead It is not clear though whether these were conducted as bona fide experiments, or theatrical film productions from the outset. These look very much staged and artificial. This was the Cold War, and the U.S.S.R. had a huge interest in intimidating the U.S. by intentionally "leaking" such footage. It is an uncontested fact that they succeeded in it, too.
IntoxicCH 4 months ago
@cchhaarrlliiie a ten year old magician can slow a frogs heart down and speed up his pulse to 180 bpm...? No, I don't think so...
markojev 4 months ago
@markojev An 18 year old magician whos knows how to do both smart ass, and preforms one, the other is harsh for the frog, its not ever what it seems.
cchhaarrlliiie 4 months ago
RichRobus
Clearly james randi this old magician couldn't do everythink wath kulagina did.No Magician could do the presentation of kulagina with the tennis ball in the little plexi glas box not even one of the best magician in germany simon pierro they showed a big doku about kulagina and he wasn't able to do it.
Micho22c 5 months ago
Ugh. Clearly threads and magnets account for all of this fraud's tricks. Scientists are very easy to fool - especially when they are LOOKING for positive results. Any magician would have made short work of her in minutes, In fact, James Randi did.
RichRobust 5 months ago
i tried for 20 years on my cell lock
razorlalalala 5 months ago
Thank you Nina.
DBlacklightPhantom 6 months ago
Frog murderer :(
MrEnterthehole 9 months ago 4
this voice looks like the voice of walter in fringe XD
lascabras69 9 months ago
FAKE AND GAY!!!!!!
tolaras6 9 months ago
yep it is this fake but tk exist they didnt do research for fake or nothing....
MegaNikol 9 months ago
I wish I could kill frogs with my mind.
Djsilver64 10 months ago 2
@Djsilver64 why frogs? :S
TheJimakos4 9 months ago
The objects shown first were moved by a magnet under the table. All the objects were metal, except for the matchbox, which could have something inside it.
The matches and stuff on the glass table were moved using static electricity. You can easily move charged plastic tubes around a table with your hand, try it.
The heart beat video is fake, it's obviously not old (just greyscale) and set up and it's not the same person doing it, i.e an actress.
apatheticwretch 10 months ago
it is reality ... i do it @apatheticwretch
trilex1234 6 months ago
@trilex1234 Okay, make a video of you doing it on solid concrete ground, not a table. Do not cover your mouth so you can't blow on it and use something that can't be moved using static electricity. If you do that you'll be the first and maybe I'll believe you.
apatheticwretch 6 months ago
@apatheticwretch How the hell can she blow into that ? huh ==. Theres a scaure glass case covering the cigarette box.
justinlover4ev 6 months ago
@justinlover4ev in my first comment i said the matchbox has a piece of metal inside it and there's a magnet under the table.
apatheticwretch 6 months ago
Frighteners bring me here, anyone else?
vvinblog 1 year ago 2
@vvinblog over her bro :)
zerodevilx 9 months ago
@vvinblog over her bro :)
guilty :D
zerodevilx 9 months ago
I have read and heard from various sources there is a price for this power if you can get to this level of skill ie heart problems,high blood presure,pains in the spine ,limbs and dizziness
n1hmrd 1 year ago
Why do you/they have the video if it's top secret?
dzidzelis 1 year ago 2
Alla Vinagradowa
micho19b 1 year ago
What was the name of the second woman? o_o
xCharizardXo 1 year ago
@xCharizardXo Oh wait I am sorry I thought you were talking about the woman in the reenactments. I spoke too soon, before finishing the video. My apologies.
helloimlulu 6 months ago
Thumbs up if you tried to move the pen sitting on your desk.
moneyquickeasy 1 year ago
@moneyquickeasy
lol yeah. just tried to move an empty cigarette box for like an hour. nothing happened. damn it.
Gonko100 1 year ago 38
@Gonko100 haha you'll get it one day; just keep practicing :)
moneyquickeasy 1 year ago
@Gonko100 Maybe the table is uneven.
BandytaCzasu 11 months ago
@Gonko100
lol. but did you try to actually do anything awesome you've seen someone do? Its like a skill, you either have it from birth and/or develop it. :)
realicee 7 months ago
@Gonko100
Keep trying like 1 year!
Reyneeru 5 months ago
Women who are experts at tantric sex can control their ovulation. There are men who can withstand lethal doses of electricity and charge their bodies like batteries to amounts that would kill a normal human, or melt skin. For this reason, I think there is room in science for people controlling their electro-magnetic output to an extent. I do however believe their needs to be more evidence. Soviet results are not 100% trustworthy, the same way that UFO sightings in the US at that time are not.
metters4lyf 1 year ago
@theufohunter123 There is no cited evidence anywhere for use of only 4% or 10%. Not to say we are always wired to use all of our brain potential at a time, of course you can always learn more, or learn to think in different ways, but to put round figures on the%we use is urban fabrication. As far as I can tell anyway, I'd be interested to find any contradictory evidence though. I just googled it for 30 mins, I dont claim to know much... I just dont believe in using the 10% argument for psi-power
metters4lyf 1 year ago
@zonex1a Who ever said that she was using "the raw power of her mind"? The entire POINT of studying psychokinetic phenomenon is to determine what causes it. "Raw mind power" is only one possible explanation. Considering the results of studies such as these, it's becoming more and more likely that the acts of using telekinesis have less to do with the mind than is the public interpretation, and much more to do with the muscles and blood flow in the body.
Larkill 1 year ago
@theufohunter123 actually 8
XD
tissetatten 1 year ago
@theufohunter123 actualy 8
XD
tissetatten 1 year ago
"like the beating heart" that is the LAST thing I would think of to play with if I could performe telekanisis
tissetatten 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Jajajaa This video is so funny. There are too many clowns:..XD XD
arkhansus 1 year ago
Comment removed
arkhansus 1 year ago
For example, we all have an electromagnetic field around us...Very small but we do.
Yogi's have been tested and the average electricity they convey is 4 times that of a normal human being.
This is was done in labs under the surveillance of doctors and scientists. Now how would you explain that?
figthersdreams 1 year ago 20
In quantum physics they realised that one's consciousness actually influences matter at an absysmal level.That's why scientists have to step out of the rooms where they do their experiments to get valid data.
If u didn'T know, we only use 4% of our brain. So what does the 96% consist of?
Some say we have forgotten knowledge and that our brains are much more powerful then what we may think.
Although I am a skeptic by nature, I do believe this to be possible
figthersdreams 1 year ago 2
@figthersdreams Quantum physics isn't a complete science, some say that the problem of quantum physics lies in its formalism, others say that we can't understand the subatomic particles because our mind chages everything (as you were saying), and other point of view says that there are some elements of the subatomic universe, that we haven't discover yet, and that make us think that is our mind who changes the results... any way, we can't explain paranormal activities with this sience.
macsmenteinmune 1 year ago
@figthersdreams And about our brain, the true is that we us only 4% at same time, for making actions, thinking and stuff. But we use a big part of our brain, I dare to say that we us more than 50%... but we don't use that 50% at the same time. Anyway, that'd be amazing if we could use all the 50% at the same time...
macsmenteinmune 1 year ago
@RS1963
You are relentless.
bonskee310 1 year ago
@bonskee310 Yep only way to be.
RS1963 1 year ago
vraiment j'aimerais y croire, mais ça fait très fraudeur et son epoque... j'aimerais biens qu'elle soi encore vivante pour avoire une certitude :)
dofussadidadofus 1 year ago
its the power of the mind
hasbor 1 year ago
How would you spell her name at 3:34 ??
Skibobdebop 1 year ago
@Skibobdebop Simple Fraud.
RS1963 1 year ago
@RS1963 Lol yup
Skibobdebop 1 year ago
Comment removed
surfshark13 1 year ago
She couldn't fool you, but she could fool the greatest men of science in her time. So here's my question. Who the fuck are you?
surfshark13 1 year ago
@surfshark13 You are rude go away.
RS1963 1 year ago
Why does the deck of cards move faster once they put the box over it? I would think that would be an impediment for whatever energy she's directing.
HotBroodish 1 year ago
RS1963
Of course thinks can be hidden but you don't understand me as long i don't have seen anythink i don't can say she used Trick i will a fackt.
Alican17b 1 year ago
@Alican17b Why would you not seeing the signs of trickery mean they aren't there? You just repeated what I was saying. I said you may not know what to look for. Of course if you don't see what is there you can't say it is. Just as in if I see the signs of what is there but is not obvious to others. I or anyone else that knows what to look for and catches it can tell you it is indeed there.
RS1963 1 year ago
Here is an actual critic case. Park maintains that if a coin is flipped enough times, even a slight imperfection can produce more than 50% heads, and that the "tiny statistical edges" PEAR reported are the result of statistical flaws. Bullshit, no matter how many times you flip or spin the coin, the probability of 1/2 or 0.5 or 50% will always remain the same. If it lands on heads more often, then that is due to luck.
angelsssssssssssss 1 year ago
@angelsssssssssssss That is not the same or even close to the experiments that we are discussing. Probability and and chance have nothing to do with a psychic test. In this case. when testing if things can be moved with the mind there is nothing left to chance. In correctly done test all the T's and Q's have been crossed. There is no margin no it's are left open. All chances of trickery are taken away in correctly done test. so results can and will be conclusive. With out any doubt.
RS1963 1 year ago
@RS1963, Yes, testing macro-PK (Which is moving or levitating physical objects by the mind) has nothing to do with chance, but what I am talking about is micro-PK (Which is influencing random events and subatomic particles by the power of the mind). Micro-PK experiments requires statistical analysis to see if the results are statistically significant or not. Yes, experiments needs to eliminate bias such as information bias, but you cannot 100% eliminate them.
angelsssssssssssss 1 year ago
@RS1963,The control group may have been placed further into the shade than the experimental group, and so on. This is why any one experiment is only used to provide support for a hypothesis, rather than proof. So, according to my subjective opinion, if James Randi's test has been won, hence I would strongly disagree that is proof of psychic powers.
angelsssssssssssss 1 year ago
@angelsssssssssssss I understand where you are coming from but to say science can or can't prove anything is real or not real is just incorrect . The facts remain science has proven or dis proven many things. As for Randi's tests. They would be done by scientists but with Randi guiding them in how to protect from fraud etc. Yes if someone did indeed pass the tests at some point. more test would have to be done. Much tougher ones too in order for conclusive facts to be arrived at.
RS1963 1 year ago
@RS1963, I didn't say that Science can or can't prove anything is real or not real. I was saying that there is no such thing as proof in Science. Again, scientist gather their information by their own experiments, then once they have support their hypothesis many times, they publish their results. Scientist only support a hypothesis not proof of a hypothesis. You cannot prove a negative. It's simple logic.
angelsssssssssssss 1 year ago
@RS1963, Yeah, people who has passed James Randi's test need to replicate their results. If they could replicate their results, then this can give us evidence that psychic phenomena is possible, but that wouldn't be proof of psychic phenomena.
angelsssssssssssss 1 year ago
@angelsssssssssssss Exactly. One round of very controlled testing is not going to be conclusive proof. Now if any psychic powers are ever proven, It still does not mean that all things claimed that can be done can be. It could be proven that actual mind reading exists. But not PK. or vise a versa One proven area will not even begin to prove all other areas. Of course there will those that say it would.
RS1963 1 year ago
@RS1963, Yes, but if Psychic powers has been proven, then there's still a strong possibility that one or more factors were responsible for the result, even if there was a control group. You're right, if one area of psychic phenomena have been shown to exist, then the area of another psychic phenomena has not. There is this sign that says, "Beware of researchers who try to attempt to prove a hypothesis in experiments."
angelsssssssssssss 1 year ago
RS1963
Did you have any proof for thath i mean you wasn't in the Video or is thath false by Uri geller we have seen a Magnet in his Hand so we can say he is a charlatan but by kulagina we didn't see anythink so we can say nothink only over all mind and i believe thath She has this powers
Alican17b 1 year ago
@Alican17b Does a crime expert have to been in a video tape of a robbery to prove that it was done? No. Does a coroner have to be the dead person to determine a cause of death? No. so Does someone that investigates so called psychics have to be involved in a video to know if one is fake or not? Of course not. Your reasoning is very flawed.
RS1963 1 year ago
@Alican17b Also just because you didn't see that fact that she was using magnets or threads show that you fully understand what to look for. Things can be hidden in the open in some circumstances, and if you don't know what or where to look you will not see it.
RS1963 1 year ago
RS1963
When you research you will find some articles where stand that is not true She don't have this Powers but the most of this articles where written from the American Side and in the Cold war it is so you don't can belive thath articles because you don't no it is true or false Nobody no thath i think only her husband or her childrens no thath
Alican17b 1 year ago
@Alican17b Being a magician I know exactly what to look for. I know exactly how she did everything in the videos. It's not hard to discover the how of what she did anyway. Yes everything she did was done by nothing more than magic effects. She was exposed as a fraud while she was doing all these things as well.
RS1963 1 year ago
Oh really they didnt use anythink of thath for propganda that are the truh Pictures of russian scientests Yes you can contact then they didnt Tell you anythink because they are not allowed to do this .
Alican17b 1 year ago
Comment removed
Mannycom420 1 year ago
These were all materials provided by their government. There is no way she was able to add "pins" into the match sticks to control them.
SleeplessNinja 1 year ago
@SleeplessNinja That is not true. It had been proven over and over again that there is no truth to anything in the video. In fact if you were to contact the Russian government they would tell you this was all made up. Even though at that time they were using it for propaganda.
RS1963 1 year ago
@RS1963 Are you facts based on your own observations or do you have an article bout this I should read? This film is bizzarre but I just refuse to believe someone has the ability to control objects like that makes, simply makes no sense
ef6854 1 year ago
@ef6854 There are all kind of reports, articles etc.. That talk about how Nina and others faked all this. Yes I have studied this as well and have found so far no one that can really do these things. I have an open mind about it but so far there has been no proof of this being real. There has never been any conclusive evidence that these things can really be done. I don't have any links at moment but the information is very easy to find.
RS1963 1 year ago
@RS1963, You are never gonna see proof of psychic phenomena in the scientific community because Science doesn't prove anything. In fact, many scientist believe that it is impossible to prove anything at all. Scientist only gather scientific information from experiments that follow the Scientific Method. Usually, the scientific information comes from the hypothesis of a experiment. So, what's the point of saying "prove it", since you can't prove anything at all?
angelsssssssssssss 1 year ago
@angelsssssssssssss That's not quite true. Science has proven many things. Iook at the vaccine for polio. Is medicine not part of science too? Of course it is. The fact that scientists do at times test psychic claims shows that they can indeed prove if it does exist or if it does not. So far scientists have found do proof of such claims. Bt.w. the science experiments are done to see if whatever it is will work or fail. That provides the proof one way or the other.
RS1963 1 year ago
@RS1963, Ok, since there is proof in Science, then why is it that there are still rumors that there is no such thing as proof in Science? Well, there are actual scientific experiments of psychokinesis, but the experiment does not involve in people who claim to move objects using the power of the mind. The experiment is used to see if people can influence random events such as the fall of the die using the power of the mind. This is called micro-PK. (Continue)
angelsssssssssssss 1 year ago
@RS1963, According to the experiment, the results are shown to be statistically significant and the result can be replicated. In a experiment, it is required to use this scientific instrument called, "Statistical Analysis" to see if there is evidence that supports the hypothesis or to see if there is evidence against the hypothesis which is the null-hypothesis. This experiments has also been shown to eliminate bias where it shows the subject cheating, random errors and wrong measurements.
angelsssssssssssss 1 year ago
@RS1963, Critics say that this type of experiments are bias because there is more than 50% of chance of a coin landing in H or T and the die landing on 6 more often because of the weight. As a study in statistics and probabilities, this is total horseshit. All the sides of a die have an equal probability of landing on the upper face. Probabilities of all sides cannot change and that's a fact in probability. Same thing goes to the coin.
angelsssssssssssss 1 year ago
@RS1963, Again, there is no such thing as proof in Science. Scientist only focus on their hypothesis and try to support their hypothesis by running experiments that follow the Scientific Method. In a experiment, The supporting evidence of a hypothesis is evidence of the possibility of whatever the hypothesis is, but the evidence of a hypothesis itself, is not proof of the hypothesis. In the basis of an experiment, there is no such thing as proof.
angelsssssssssssss 1 year ago
@RS1963, Let me make this point more vivid. If the results from the sunflower experiment were taken that the hypothesis was proven 100%, then there would still be a strong possibility that one or more factors were responsible for the result even if there was a control group, For instance, the concentration of the phosphate may have actually been 110mg/L due to lab error, there may have been excess ferilizer landing by chance only on the experimental gropu, but not the control group. (Continue)
angelsssssssssssss 1 year ago
Sorry they both move
Alican17b 1 year ago
RS 1963 Yes but when you look one time she moved only the compass needle and in other time she moved the compass and the needle is not moving and how could you explain one time in a other video you will find it she moved the compass and the compass needle is moving too they both
Alican17b 1 year ago
@Alican17b Same way as I said magnets. If you knew how magicians used them to move compass needles and other objects you would understand how she in fact used magnets perfectly.
RS1963 1 year ago
RS1963. Yes but When you are looking carefully then you will see that she move not the compass needle she moved the compass and i dont can think that she can move this big compass in such a form because she have too make very scary moves with her body
Alican17b 1 year ago
@Alican17b Actually that is even more clue as to the how of the compass moving. The movements of her body are to misdirecting the movement of the part of her body where the magnet actually is. No it's not on her chest. Watch it closely and you should catch on to where it is. Remember not just the needle of the compass is affected by the magnet. The outer body of the compass is metal. That is why the whole compass moves as well.
RS1963 1 year ago
so since when does a magnet move matches?
mralan9010 1 year ago
@mralan9010 Very easily when metal strait pins with the heads cut off have been inserted into the matchsticks. Don't believe it? Try it yourself.
RS1963 1 year ago
@RS1963 a match stick is way too thin for a metal straight pin to go in without splitting it and what i wanna know is y ppl are soo close minded to these things. Our military today is studying up on ppl like this for their reasons.
mralan9010 1 year ago
@mralan9010 Nice try but no they are not. magicians do it all the time. Yes I am a magician. Next time you buy a dress shirt and take out the pins that keep it folded in place. look at the pins. You will see they are not too big. That is a fact. The military is not studying so called psychics. That's what the believers in such things and the frauds would like you to to think Do some research and found out.
RS1963 1 year ago
@RS1963 Actually sir there are records that were declassified by the CIA involving psychic ability's. Do your research before trying to debunk this as fake. These cases date back to the early 1900's.
SleeplessNinja 1 year ago
@SleeplessNinja Actually those so called documents never were real. They were made to look real and over the years have been re printed in tabloid newspapers such as The National Enquirer etc... So maybe you should do more research?
RS1963 1 year ago
Comment removed
RS1963 1 year ago
How can magnets move the objeckts when she is not still move her body or hands
Alican17b 1 year ago
@Alican17b The magnets of course were not held in her hands. She had then taped or bandaged at her knees (for moving things on the table) On her chest for the movement of the compass. They can be attached anywhere. Go ask a magician.
RS1963 1 year ago
Magnetism!
JohnnyGalt1 1 year ago
omg ye I see that glue like material... wierd
annietomo 1 year ago
Nina Kulagina kann die Objekte wegen ihrem starken elektromagnetischen Feld bewegen das bei normaler körperlicher Ruhe 4 bis 6 mal stärker ist als das bei einem normalen Menschen bei ihren psychokinetischen Vorführungen verbraucht ihr körper extrem viel Energie .
Alican17b 1 year ago
Um, you could actually see objects moving and levitating on its own by Electromagnetic fields(EMF). Arrcording to many physicist, these EMFs causing objects to move and levitate is quite feasible. In Youtube, look up, John Hutchinson, Hutchinson Effect. You will see objects behaving very strangly. They behave quite similar to poltergeist and psychokinetic activity.
angelsssssssssssss 1 year ago
google - Princeton Pear
bmsz1234 1 year ago
You concentrate on something so hard that your desires get integrated into your sense of reality. In this state of madness, you have learned telekenesis. Unfortunately, you cannot prove this to anyone else.
If it is factual, why would belief be required? No one has ever proved such abilities. Ever.
There is a million dollars waiting for the first person to do so. What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof.
SunStridar 1 year ago
there is no absolute truths, and yes belief makes things true, even in science certain assumptions without the possibility of scientific evidence were made for certain accepted theories to hold up like for example einstein's special theory of relativity which hinges to the theoretical assumption that light travels at a constant speed point A to point B. If we ever have to make a definite stand on any ideas or phenomenon , we always have to jump into 'a leap of faith' in order to do that.
bonskee310 1 year ago
Well dunno much about details on how the cold war communist scientists conducted their tests on Nina and the others but they certainly bought it and set about planning the diabolical scheme to telepathically assasinate western leaders using telekinesis,and they were serious about this. They pioneered advanced studies of parapsychology to serve their own political ends. Thats why even today psychical research and development are very much advanced in such countries such as Poland and Bulgaria.
bonskee310 1 year ago
Yes people can believe whatever they want. Does belief make it true? No. Don't you think that if it were true most if not all scientists in the world would believe it? Or even care about it? That is a key telling point right there. The ones that have said they think it's real again they have had flawed tests. That is the truth.
RS1963 1 year ago
Yes there somethings that can't be explained away just as a trick. We have all had things happen that very well maybe more than coincidence. Do they happen all the time? No. Are all such things more than a coincidence? Again no. Is there really a way to tell what in those cases is or isn't a coincidence? More than likely there isn't a for sure way to tell.
RS1963 1 year ago
You should research more on parapsychology as a whole. I recommend the works of Jaime Licauco specifically his his book "Understanding the Psychic Powers of Man" He is not a psychic himself, but actually a skeptic at first, but his scholarly investigation into parapsychology led him into what he is now as founder of the Inner Mind Development Institute.
Even the great Dr. Carl Jung was fascinated by parapsychology, I bet you know his story about the scarab beetle. But then again...
bonskee310 1 year ago
"Do I know everything about it no. Is it possible to know everything about it? No."
You're spot on about that because there is a universe of things yet to be understood and discovered by science about the human mind, Its not all about telekinesis and mind reading that is somehow connected to your profession but a whole range of phenomena under parapsychology such as OOBE, Hightened Intuition, Premonition, Astral Projection etc. that were all thoroughly scientificallly investigated.
bonskee310 1 year ago
Sadly to say there are magicians who are not honest about what they do, that they ingloriously using the psychic phenomenon to dramatize their magic tricks. Yes, I'm not a magician, but I enjoy magic shows, i happen to be friends with quite a number of street magicians and they have no psychic pretenses, just plain old sleight of hand and I like that and I hope you are in that category too.
bonskee310 1 year ago
I don't do any mental magic but their are some very good ones out there that do and don't claim to be real. Trust me the ones that claim to be real are fake. such as Uri Geller, Sylvia Browne, John Edwards, Ask your magician friends more about these types of things. Unless they probably will say what I have. Check out magicians that do mental magic such as Banacheck. Richard Osterlind, Luke Jermay. None of them claim to be real. But some do believe they are real as well.
RS1963 1 year ago
I'm not closed minded to something being real psychic wise. But up to this point in time have not found or seen anything that could or should be taken as being real. I don't think you feel this way but to a good many skeptics are those that don't believe in anything and can never be swayed in the other direction. That is so far from the truth. Skeptics are very open. It's just that they demand that very strict test be given to those claiming such powers. So far most testing is not very strict
RS1963 1 year ago
And to say that these wonderfully gifted individuals withstood these scientific testing over a great period of time and with the advancing technology is a testament of the boundless capacity of the human mind that still baffle scientists up to this day. You magicians are just showmen, this is the real thing.
bonskee310 1 year ago
Well okay, based on your earlier posts, it seems that you are a mr. know-it-all type of a guy so I am quite surprised you aren't familiar with the famous Dr. Richard Dawkins. Psychokinesis and psychic abilities in humans are subjects of serious scientific investigations for decades especially in the former iron curtain countries. Psychics and telekinetics are subjected to the mot rigorous scientific testing and scrutiny that mere conjurer like you could have easily been spotted.
bonskee310 1 year ago
If you were to really look into how scientists test so called psychics you would be in shock to see how easy it is to fool them. Check into project Alpha. Even tho this wasn't in a lab look at the vid of Uri Geller's failed spot on the Tonight show. Everything was protected the way that scientists should protect things but don't. Geller claimed it was do to Carson being a skeptic. That had nothing to do with it. belief or not would not matter if he had been real he would not have failed.
RS1963 1 year ago
I don't "Know it all" nor do I claim too. Yes there are a very very few subjects I know very well such as this one. That knowledge didn't come over night nor over a short period of time either. More like 37 plus years. Do I know everything about it no. Is it possible to know everything about it? No.
RS1963 1 year ago
RS1963's reference to fairies and unicorns gave him away as a Dawkins fan. No amount of physical evidence about telekinesis or about anything that contradicts their warped beliefs could ever change their atheist belief based on the scientific method.
bonskee310 1 year ago
Sorry but I have no idea who Dawkins is. That is a fact. I have never heard of him nor do I. B.T.W I'm not an atheist. I do believe in god and always will. So how's that for blowing your theory out of the water? The facts are I know what to look for I have studied these things for years. I do know for a fact when someone is doing something by trick means. How? I'm a magician. You and others on here obviously are not.
RS1963 1 year ago
Also Scientists have no clue how to test or protect the test items from being tampered with when testing psychic claims. That is a fact. If you do the research you will see why and how it is fact. Again I don't know who Dawkins is. I don't know what he does nor do I want to For all I know he could be a game show host.
RS1963 1 year ago
@RS1963
Friend, respect your opinion. But I advise you to study about Taoist meditation (chikung) and Hindu meditation - you'll learn that can influence the matter with the mind. Contrary to what you think, there is another reality which you and most known and had been forgotten by the time stifled by technology and the attachment to the physical world. Study and practice my friend.
andrekorea 1 year ago
There is nothing wrong with meditation that's for sure. But no where has it been shown that anything that is shown done but Nina or others can be done from meditation. Again any "tests" that have agreed with the claims, have been flawed tests. The conditions set have been very non secured and open to all kinds of tampering. That is something you learn if you research and really study these things.
RS1963 1 year ago
i can do telekinesis but not all the time joining hands in a circle is how it can be done s for the women on the glass looking table its static electricity from a plexiglass all can do this
narcovice 1 year ago
The only minds that are being controlled are the ones that believe in these things. It's fine to enjoy these things for what they are magic tricks. But to try and proclaim that this is done by the mind is ridiculous. We no longer live in the 1600's when warlocks were believed in we matured and learned there are no monsters under the bed. At least those of sound mind did. Dragons do not exist, Nor do Fairies, Unicorns, etc.. People can not move things with their mind it's a trick.
RS1963 1 year ago
its real, is not fake! pure mind control
andrekorea 1 year ago
Comment removed
RS1963 1 year ago
The fake is from all skeptic, Randi included, who try to explain us that fraud what proved, without any proof.
Prove without proof, better than believe without logic? The great scam !
Informatisse 1 year ago
well ok, the magnets theory would explain why she raises her heart to 240 bpm and looses like 2 pounds on every sesion ???
plus the 40 cientist group including 2 nobel prices who experienced the fenomenon and have nothing yo say about it ?
cmon, get your facts straigth
bustabo23 1 year ago
Your going to believe everything said that is in a video that was produced by a Communist country during the cold war? There is not much in the video that is factual.
RS1963 1 year ago
yeah, like US didnt lie on anything during the cold war... this isnt the only video, and rusians cientists werent the only ones that saw her perform, do some research. im esceptical too but facts ARE facts. btw what has comunism to do with this?? hehe stupid
bustabo23 1 year ago
Of course we did the same things. If you have to ask what that has to do with anything you wouldn't understand anyway. I see this conversation is finished before it even started.
RS1963 1 year ago
If you want to call a video that is full of false claims and made up "facts" Facts you can but that doesn't mean any of what was said or shown is true. B.t.w. the facts are none of it is true. You need to do the research.
RS1963 1 year ago
well i dont know how you know those are "false claims" but since you werent there ill just asume you say that becouse you believe that, well i believe otherwise. since you blame comunism and bring political stuff into this i can tell youre not an open minded kinda guy. so yeah youre rigth this conversation is finished, cant talk with a brain on a can. sorry
bustabo23 1 year ago
By researching such things and other ways as well. You have heard of research haven't you? Or are you like all of about two other people in this thread that have no idea what research is or how to do it?
RS1963 1 year ago
That should have been everyone one on this thread accept for about two others that know what research is.
RS1963 1 year ago
like i said its over, youre talking non sense.
bye, stop replying this is mi last comment here
bustabo23 1 year ago
the second one move the objeckts with the elektro statik energie
Alican17b 2 years ago
Nope that wouldn't work that well. It's all threads and magnets
RS1963 1 year ago
man muss sich nina kulagina nur mal am anfang anschauen sie sitzt auf so einem hocker und in so einem glaskäfig
da ist so ein gegenstand der sich von ihr
wegbewegt sie muss ihre hände nicht einmahl benutzen.Und zu Alla Vinogradowa sage ich sie kann die gegenstände nur mit hilfer der elektrostatichen aufladung der platte bewegen warum bewegt sie den die gegenstände nicht wie kulagina also zu sich und nicht andauernd hin und her rollen wegen dem geringeren wiederstandt
Alican17b 2 years ago
we were all born with this ability. We temporaroly forget iwhen we are taught that there are alleged boundrys on everything in life. This part of our m inds in my opinion is usually destroyed around the time of 3-7 years old. and can be redeveloped
dikki2010 2 years ago
The ability to do this by fake means sure. For real not a chance.
RS1963 1 year ago
The only time any part of a person's brain is destroyed is if a person has a stroke, or suffers a severe head injury, or oxygen has been cut off from the brain for an extended period. The saying that humans only use ten percent of their brain is false. All humans use 100 percent of the brain unless they have had an injury to the brain.
RS1963 1 year ago
Wow..every post of Rs1963 makes me smile:_) u seem to know alot ,,Sir,,..
at least ur not as boring as the new movies coming out every month.XD get some sex and calm down rofl..
Faststick 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
something's wrong... I dont think that URSS would have spared the life of anyone... I believe Nina Kulagina's case but i dont think it is exactly like that
DivsHeely 2 years ago
Comment removed
DivsHeely 2 years ago
she has a magnet in on her tits.....the first lady all the objects came toward her the second i dont know
Jdub67530 2 years ago
She may have had one of the magnets hidden on her chest. One place she did for a fact have one hidden was on one of her knees. She may have had one on an ankle at one time as well. Before anyone asked how it was held there. By a bandage or any other means it could be attached to the body and then easily removed later on.
RS1963 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The human mind is more powerful than you think. The Pineal Gland is the key, and the elites know this, which is why they try to block it's power by all the negativity and fluoride in the world. FREE YOUR MIND!!
bloodelfpaladin 2 years ago
Comment removed
bloodelfpaladin 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Nina Kulagina, has been witnessed by Western Parapsychologist, but has never been extensively tested under rigorous laboratory conditions in the West, and her feats have not been scruntinized by professional magican.
angelsssssssssssss 2 years ago
Again scientists have no clue as to how to test a proclaimed psychic. She had been investigated by magicians when she was still alive as well as all her videos have been viewed by magicians well versed in the ways of fake psychics after her death. Just because she's dead doesn't mean that her videos can't well examined to determine if trickery was used or not. One doesn't have to be living to be be proven a real or fake psychic.
RS1963 2 years ago
Live long and prosper
ReyesRobby 2 years ago
boll shit
leitol0 2 years ago 2
There are two different Nina Kulaginas in each of the videos...
Either that... or it's just that one's a younger version, and one's an older... :/
ResentfulButtocks 2 years ago
It's obviously a reenactment. The quality of the video is far too clear and the actors are not exactly professionals. Did you seriously think that both videos were from the 60s?
ritter89 2 years ago
lol.... some people....
nicemutant 2 years ago
This isn't french idiot xD
markojev 2 years ago 2
damn i shouldnt have watched this... im studying french! i shouldnt be exposed to this kind of french
grandexandi 2 years ago