These guys are Phonies and this video only proves you can find any number of phony witnesses who want to pretend they were a part of the action when in fact they were sitting on the Lav,
I'm sorry. I struggle to understand the video title - 'Undeniable proof a plane did NOT hit the pentagon'......Is it just me or have you actually given credence to the fact but just not the offical line?
alright you guys are going to give me hell for saying this and i know you are but if you go back and look at the first video of this series it shows the flight path going towards the pentagon circling around and going back to hit the pentagon from the SOUTH side this is obvious to me that the eye witness's saw the first path towards the pentagon before the path to the contact
Holy hell a prosecuting attorney would have a field day with this interviewer. Leading the witnesses through the interviews five years after the fact, priceless.
here is what gets me: another vid on youtube states that there was a cloud of smoke at and EXTREMELY fast speed, and it can only be seen for 1 frame, so he zoomed in. it looked like a missle.
OMG! At 3:45 i would have sooo seen the plane hit. That shit was sooo not a plane! wtff! it was too small and fast. i woulda seen the plane smoosh into the building!
So if the plane didn't hit the pentagon, where the fuck did it go? Did it fly into a hole in the spacetime continuum? Maybe it flew into a wormhole and reappeared at Area 51!! Yeah!! That's it! Maybe the plane was a hologram projected by Capt Jean Luc Pickard from the starship Enterprise!! You bunch of fucking morons...
Is that how your intellectual curiosity ends? There are a few alternative possibilities, but instead you're ready to lash out in anger instead of looking for an answer to your own question. there's video evidence of a large plane flying near the pentagon just after the explosion, and it could have landed at a nearby airport or military base. Most people would fixate on the explosion caused by a missile or drone and not see a plane fly over the pentagon. That's one theory.
Wouldn't Mr. Turcios' vantage point be #3? And if he was standing right there, watching the plane, did he see where the plane went? Where there witnesses that saw it on the other side of the Pentagon?
before i clicked on this video, after part 2 ended, it said this video (part 3) had 697 views, but when i clicked on it, it says that there have been 2,789 views.... weird. why the difference?
Wouldn't the officers need to get permission from their employer "The Pentagon" before speaking to to these independent investigators?? Unless these guys are PIOs they would likely not be allowed to speak to anyone from the media which includes these interviewers. I find it suspicious that they are in uniform first of all. If in uniform they would have to be on the payroll unless they did these interviews before going on-shift or after punching out of their shift. Somthing to think about
These guys are Phonies and this video only proves you can find any number of phony witnesses who want to pretend they were a part of the action when in fact they were sitting on the Lav,
GuitarGearProReview 1 week ago
I'm sorry. I struggle to understand the video title - 'Undeniable proof a plane did NOT hit the pentagon'......Is it just me or have you actually given credence to the fact but just not the offical line?
Knowledgeboy100 1 month ago
@TruthIsNever The countless witnesses saw a missile and just thought it was a plane.
ToyRail 1 month ago
alright you guys are going to give me hell for saying this and i know you are but if you go back and look at the first video of this series it shows the flight path going towards the pentagon circling around and going back to hit the pentagon from the SOUTH side this is obvious to me that the eye witness's saw the first path towards the pentagon before the path to the contact
SNIPEZEES 1 month ago
@SNIPEZEES nope because later on, the police mention that it was low, and he saw an explosion shortly after. This guy even said he saw the "fireball"
thumm99 2 weeks ago
Holy hell a prosecuting attorney would have a field day with this interviewer. Leading the witnesses through the interviews five years after the fact, priceless.
CerebrumPedere 1 month ago
Looks like you proved it was a plane.
TheEodtch 2 months ago
All the witness reports are the same because our corrupt government told them what to say
xXJyoungXx 2 months ago
So where did N644AA go? What happened to the crew and passangers?
FreedomsQB 3 months ago 4
@FreedomsQB Lined up and shot in head.
KBendix 1 month ago
@FreedomsQB *spoiler alert* magic happened
ChildrenOfBodom07 1 month ago
@FreedomsQB just like Bermuda Triangle unexplained! Goverment cover up, It has been along.
AngelsAndAirwaves100 1 month ago
here is what gets me: another vid on youtube states that there was a cloud of smoke at and EXTREMELY fast speed, and it can only be seen for 1 frame, so he zoomed in. it looked like a missle.
shilze1 3 months ago
OMG! At 3:45 i would have sooo seen the plane hit. That shit was sooo not a plane! wtff! it was too small and fast. i woulda seen the plane smoosh into the building!
MyBeibiiGifted90 3 months ago
brilliant work , this should have more views
bentotheclarke 3 months ago
So if the plane didn't hit the pentagon, where the fuck did it go? Did it fly into a hole in the spacetime continuum? Maybe it flew into a wormhole and reappeared at Area 51!! Yeah!! That's it! Maybe the plane was a hologram projected by Capt Jean Luc Pickard from the starship Enterprise!! You bunch of fucking morons...
crazydiamond63 4 months ago
@crazydiamond63
Is that how your intellectual curiosity ends? There are a few alternative possibilities, but instead you're ready to lash out in anger instead of looking for an answer to your own question. there's video evidence of a large plane flying near the pentagon just after the explosion, and it could have landed at a nearby airport or military base. Most people would fixate on the explosion caused by a missile or drone and not see a plane fly over the pentagon. That's one theory.
radicalsquare 4 months ago
@2gragari every witness say they saw a plane... so how does that make it an inside job...
TheArsenal1900 4 months ago
@TheArsenal1900 by putting bombs in the petagon
THEPROTOTYPE51 4 months ago
@THEPROTOTYPE51 they all said they saw a plane crash into the pentagon...
TheArsenal1900 4 months ago
My dad was in the pentagon when the explosion happened. He will never talk about it even 10 years later.
Pianoasis 5 months ago
Wouldn't Mr. Turcios' vantage point be #3? And if he was standing right there, watching the plane, did he see where the plane went? Where there witnesses that saw it on the other side of the Pentagon?
405manda 5 months ago
before i clicked on this video, after part 2 ended, it said this video (part 3) had 697 views, but when i clicked on it, it says that there have been 2,789 views.... weird. why the difference?
ImTheGreatestBLikeMe 5 months ago
So if the plane lifted up over the pentagon. Where did it go and why didn't anyone else see it "leaving" the scene?
Shorty20122012 5 months ago
Wouldn't the officers need to get permission from their employer "The Pentagon" before speaking to to these independent investigators?? Unless these guys are PIOs they would likely not be allowed to speak to anyone from the media which includes these interviewers. I find it suspicious that they are in uniform first of all. If in uniform they would have to be on the payroll unless they did these interviews before going on-shift or after punching out of their shift. Somthing to think about
fxyeti 5 months ago
i really like this series. good job
mitchbos9 6 months ago 14
9:39 making a porn?
Dfloops 1 year ago