How can you base a thesis on something that hasn't been definitively proven.While it's great to have an open mind and speculate, but it's offense to relay conjectures in attempts to sway the public.Cohesion exemplified through a great many models and ties into natural selection which accounts for prevailing state of the human species(for example) Until sufficiently proven, the conclusion or thesis of this talk is balderdash. Outcomes of all types are predicated or based upon biological origins.
How can you base a thesis on something that hasn't been definitively proven.While it's great to have an open mind and speculate, but it's offense to relay conjectures in attempts to sway the public.Cohesion exemplified through a great many models and ties into natural selection which accounts for prevailing state of the human species(for example) Until sufficiently proven, the conclusion or thesis of this talk is balderdash. Outcomes of all types are predicated or based upon biological origins.
How can you base a thesis on something that hasn't been definitively proven.While it's great to have an open mind and speculate, but it's offense to relay conjectures in attempts to sway the public.Cohesion exemplified through a great many models and ties into natural selection which accounts for prevailing state of the human species(for example) Until sufficiently proven, the conclusion or thesis of this talk is balderdash. Outcomes of all types are predicated or based upon biological origins.
How can you base a thesis on something that hasn't been definitively proven.While it's great to have an open mind and speculate, but it's offense to relay conjectures in attempts to sway the public.Cohesion exemplified through a great many models and ties into natural selection which accounts for prevailing state of the human species(for example) Until sufficiently proven, the conclusion or thesis of this talk is balderdash. Outcomes of all types are predicated or based upon biological origins.
I think he jumps to a big conclusion from trust to: 'Belief in God is physically built in' . People who are very trusting are easier to influence. They are more likely to believe in the religion they were raised to follow by their society.
@Lubziw perhaps trusting people are less corrupt - and those less trusting have lost their "innocence" due to negative life experiences (a cup half empty or half full theory). You have a point; but it's quite vague and generalising. There are many trusting carefree individuals who give the benefit of the doubt - and perhaps don't allow the "doubt" part to negatively imprint their life......
his anecdote about paris was totally about charity, this is the problem with construct validity, if you definition is too vague you research says almost nothing. Two important statements "this is speculative so no the slides are not available, my co-authors would kill me" LOL! and "I should have said this when the room was full" AHAHAHAHAH w/e I respect this guy for trying, he must write really good grant proposals...
"Give oxytocin to make them trust more" -- this could make a person "more of a pushover" OR perhaps "a sociopath" -- it seems if there's something you want people to TRUST you on, maybe you could find more, less bodily intrusive ways of delivering that message?
I know its 1 year late, BUT, well, if you WANT to trust someone, then there is prolly oxytocin or other features making you inclined to think so, i guess thats the problem around it, when people would have much better outcomes IF they were inclined to trust vs the postulated state of non-trust.
THis explains a certain type of religious abuse. If one child in a religious family is abused, they probably have trouble with trust. If they then don't follow the family religious ethics and beliefs they are very likely to be ostracized. Oxytocin has to do with mother/child bonding during nursing and increases the likelihood of abuse and lack of trust.
Neuroeconomics? As in: "you have neurons and you're an economist?" :) also, following this logic, if I'm a tax lawyer and I do a fellowship in neurology does that make me a neurotaxlawyer?
Neuroeconomics combines neuroscience,economics and psychology to study how people make decisions. It looks of the role of the brain when we evaluate decisions,categorize risks and rewards,and interact with each other. It can be included in the field of social neuroscience. Try to get info before any make comments.
This has been flagged as spam show
How can you base a thesis on something that hasn't been definitively proven.While it's great to have an open mind and speculate, but it's offense to relay conjectures in attempts to sway the public.Cohesion exemplified through a great many models and ties into natural selection which accounts for prevailing state of the human species(for example) Until sufficiently proven, the conclusion or thesis of this talk is balderdash. Outcomes of all types are predicated or based upon biological origins.
drjmiller71 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
How can you base a thesis on something that hasn't been definitively proven.While it's great to have an open mind and speculate, but it's offense to relay conjectures in attempts to sway the public.Cohesion exemplified through a great many models and ties into natural selection which accounts for prevailing state of the human species(for example) Until sufficiently proven, the conclusion or thesis of this talk is balderdash. Outcomes of all types are predicated or based upon biological origins.
drjmiller71 1 month ago
How can you base a thesis on something that hasn't been definitively proven.While it's great to have an open mind and speculate, but it's offense to relay conjectures in attempts to sway the public.Cohesion exemplified through a great many models and ties into natural selection which accounts for prevailing state of the human species(for example) Until sufficiently proven, the conclusion or thesis of this talk is balderdash. Outcomes of all types are predicated or based upon biological origins.
drjmiller71 1 month ago
How can you base a thesis on something that hasn't been definitively proven.While it's great to have an open mind and speculate, but it's offense to relay conjectures in attempts to sway the public.Cohesion exemplified through a great many models and ties into natural selection which accounts for prevailing state of the human species(for example) Until sufficiently proven, the conclusion or thesis of this talk is balderdash. Outcomes of all types are predicated or based upon biological origins.
drjmiller71 1 month ago
Its very interesting video.
ForexReviewsCentral 2 months ago
It is great learning from these video.
MrPEDOCTOR 3 months ago
Comment removed
RipTheJackR 6 months ago
@VinkoRajic u'r a moron
iamsterdam19 7 months ago
I am maybe the only really telepathic person in the world. You should not think that I could be Schizophrenic.
I can exchange voice, video, smell, people can move small move muscles on my body from distance and much more.
Maybe some of Neurologist or scientist
could help me or is maybe interesting to make research on my phenomena.
VinkoRajic 9 months ago
@light4rmLove we can maintain innocence and use good judgement at the same time, can't we. My objection is to the conclusion he jumped to.
Lubziw 10 months ago
great man
flowewritharoma 10 months ago
"I think that men has been testosterone poisoned..." LOL.
texugonervoso 1 year ago
I think he jumps to a big conclusion from trust to: 'Belief in God is physically built in' . People who are very trusting are easier to influence. They are more likely to believe in the religion they were raised to follow by their society.
Lubziw 1 year ago
@Lubziw perhaps trusting people are less corrupt - and those less trusting have lost their "innocence" due to negative life experiences (a cup half empty or half full theory). You have a point; but it's quite vague and generalising. There are many trusting carefree individuals who give the benefit of the doubt - and perhaps don't allow the "doubt" part to negatively imprint their life......
Light4rmLove 10 months ago
Comment removed
Ashitakaandsan 1 year ago
his anecdote about paris was totally about charity, this is the problem with construct validity, if you definition is too vague you research says almost nothing. Two important statements "this is speculative so no the slides are not available, my co-authors would kill me" LOL! and "I should have said this when the room was full" AHAHAHAHAH w/e I respect this guy for trying, he must write really good grant proposals...
Xenophanes21 1 year ago
"Give oxytocin to make them trust more" -- this could make a person "more of a pushover" OR perhaps "a sociopath" -- it seems if there's something you want people to TRUST you on, maybe you could find more, less bodily intrusive ways of delivering that message?
conzatorium 1 year ago
@conzatorium
I know its 1 year late, BUT, well, if you WANT to trust someone, then there is prolly oxytocin or other features making you inclined to think so, i guess thats the problem around it, when people would have much better outcomes IF they were inclined to trust vs the postulated state of non-trust.
RipTheJackR 6 months ago
Comment removed
AntEyeTheist 2 years ago
excellent worker!
1888junkteam 2 years ago
THis explains a certain type of religious abuse. If one child in a religious family is abused, they probably have trouble with trust. If they then don't follow the family religious ethics and beliefs they are very likely to be ostracized. Oxytocin has to do with mother/child bonding during nursing and increases the likelihood of abuse and lack of trust.
DadsBlueAngel 2 years ago
Publish A Book! This is good stuff,you have talent.
If you want to do a book, contact gurdonboybooks@yahoo
We seek good book ideas, we finance, our staff can write it
if you don't have time too, we do all publishing related work
to have YOUR IDEA on the market selling in 4 weeks.
MrRancher02 2 years ago
I thought it quite funny!
didakoimama 3 years ago
Neuroeconomics? As in: "you have neurons and you're an economist?" :) also, following this logic, if I'm a tax lawyer and I do a fellowship in neurology does that make me a neurotaxlawyer?
LittleKamikadze 3 years ago
dumbest question ever.
wkdzairi 3 years ago
Neuroeconomics combines neuroscience,economics and psychology to study how people make decisions. It looks of the role of the brain when we evaluate decisions,categorize risks and rewards,and interact with each other. It can be included in the field of social neuroscience. Try to get info before any make comments.
lluviamusyckrave 2 years ago 2
@lluviamusyckrave Let me tell you what's missing from that: SOCIOLOGY.
conzatorium 1 year ago