This trial is a sad commentary on plaintiff's counsel who fails here in every respect to've prepped her client for a predictable defense attack. E.g., reactive-answering evoked from plaintiff during deft.counsel's questions & provocations typify deft. tricks to achieve xactly that. A plaintiff's defensive reactions will 'give' the win to defendant since victim is caused to appear to've lied; ergo, seen as 'guilty' for failing to prove her claim. As successfully mislead, Jury finds for defendant.
This trial is a sad commentary on plaintiff's counsel who fails here in every respect to've prepped her client for a predictable defense attack. E.g., reactive-answering evoked from plaintiff during deft.counsel's questions & provocations typify deft. tricks to achieve xactly that. A plaintiff's defensive reactions will 'give' the win to defendant since victim is caused to appear to've lied; ergo, seen as 'guilty' for failing to prove her claim. As successfully mislead, Jury finds for defendant.
evernetherall 2 months ago in playlist BritDram: Great Finds ii.
PART 8 PLEASE!!!! THANK YOU FOR THESE BRILLIANT POSTINGS.
henna696 2 months ago in playlist More videos from callzum2